Archive for the ‘Biodynamics’ Category

Liquor Industry News 6-18-13

June 18, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday June 18th 2013

No Biodynamic Rating Today

 

Famous Grouse maker in £10m expansion

 

Source: The Scotsman

By PETER RANSCOMBE

17/06/2013

 

FAMOUS Grouse maker Edrington is preparing to follow in the footsteps of larger rivals Diageo and Pernod Ricard by expanding its production as the whisky industry gears up to sate the continuing overseas thirst for Scotch.

 

The group – which also produces Cutty Sark, Highland Park and The Macallan – is running the rules over plans to increase output from its distilleries as it prepares to post its full-year results in a fortnight’s time.

 

Chief executive Ian Curle told The Scotsman that the company is more likely to expand its current sites rather than building another distillery, although all options were still open.

 

“Over the next two or three years we will probably put additional capacity into some of our existing sites,” he said.

 

“Like many of our competitors, we’re seeing a positive outlook for the years to come.

 

“We’re still looking at the numbers but it could well be a significant expansion. We’re evaluating the options but it’s more likely to be around our existing distillation sites.

 

“I don’t think we’d be thinking about greenfield developments.”

 

News of Edrington’s ramp-up of production comes amid a flurry of expansions within the Scotch industry.

 

On Friday, French spirits giant Pernod Ricard – which owns Paisley-based Chivas Brothers, Scotland’s second-largest distiller and the owner of labels including Chivas Regal, The Glenlivet and Royal Salute – signalled its commitment to increasing production in Scotland despite a slowdown in sales growth in the Chinese market.

 

Chivas Brothers is building a facility at Carron, on the banks of the River Spey, at a site previously occupied by the Imperial distillery, having already re-opened its Glen Keith unit and expanded Glenallachie, Glentauchers, Longmorn and Tormore.

 

In April, arch-rival Diageo – the biggest Scotch distiller and maker of Bell’s, Johnnie Walker and Talisker – selected Teaninich near Alness in Easter Ross as the site for its next £50 million “super-distillery”, following on from the opening of Roseisle near Elgin in 2010.

 

Curle’s comments came as Edrington unveiled a £10m expansion of its overseas distribution network, bringing work in-house that was previously contracted out to third parties. Under what Curle described as a “step-change” in its business, Edrington will take control of its own distribution in the Middle East, south-east Asia and the United States. Together, the three markets account for about 26 per cent of total sales at the group, which is owned by the Robertson Trust, a charity that shares its profits with good causes.

 

Curle said: “Today’s announcement marks a step change in Edrington’s business. Worldwide demand for premium and super-premium spirits continues to grow and by expanding our distribution capabilities so significantly we are seizing the opportunity to increase investment in our brands.”

 

Under the plans, Edrington USA will take over distribution across the Pond from Rémy Cointreau USA. In the Middle East, Edrington FIX – a joint venture with FIX Wines & Spirits – will launch on 1 August, while Edrington Singapore will take over from Beam Global Asia.

 

Edrington’s profits in the year to 31 March, 2012, rose by 5.2 per cent to £148.8m, on the back of a 0.5 per cent increase in sales to £556.1m.

 

 

——

India: Your glass of Scotch whisky, French wine may get cheaper soon

 

Source: NDTV

By: Ramarko Sengupta

June 18, 2013

 

So, you like your glass of exquisite Scotch at the end of a hard day’s work but at the same time you can’t help but complain about the spiralling prices of everything including that bottle of imported Scotch you picked up on your way back from work.

 

Your woes may soon have an answer in the government proposing to cut import duty on spirits and wines to 40 per cent.

 

According to reports, Commerce and Industry minister Anand Sharma has made an offer to the European Union (EU) as part of a free trade agreement (FTA) to slash the import duty on spirits and wines to 40 per cent from 150 per cent currently.

 

India also proposed to cut the entry price per bottle of wine to $3.7 (around Rs 217) and whisky to $5.5 (Around Rs 322).

 

So, if you are a connoisseur of French wine or Scotch whisky, this sure will be music to your ears- notes of Scotland’s famous bagpipe if you will.

 

However, with cheaper imports flooding the market, India’s domestic spirits and wines industry is likely to take a hit, as more and more people may move to the imported variety shunning the domestic produce.

 

Indians are ‘high’ on Scotch, with the market for arguably Scotland’s most popular produce growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of over 30 per cent.

 

India imports 16 million litres of scotch whisky annually.

 

The move by the government is seen benefitting companies like Pernord-Ricard and Diageo India.

 

 

——

Royal row for Diageo as top Irish lawyer slams Guinness ‘PR coup’

 

Source: Beverage Daily

Jun 17th

 

The director general (DG) of the Law Society of Ireland has reportedly said that the Irish government should stop foreign dignitaries like Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip from being pictured with a pint of Guinness, branding it the ‘greatest PR coup ever’ for Diageo.

 

http://www.beveragedaily.com/Regulation-Safety/Royal-row-for-Diageo-as-top-Irish-lawyer-slams-Guinness-PR-coup

 

 

——

Heineken Weighs New Brewery for Mexico Comeback in AB InBev Duel

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Brendan Case

Jun 17, 2013

 

Heineken NV (HEIA) may build a new brewery in Mexico as it wins back market share lost after its 2010 purchase of the nation’s second-largest brewer, said Marc Busain, the company’s top executive in the country.

 

The Amsterdam-based brewer, the world’s third-largest, boosted its Mexican market share last year to about 42 percent after a decline in 2011, Busain said last week in an interview in Mexico City.

 

The gain is bolstering Heineken as Anheuser-Busch InBev NV (ABI), the world’s largest brewer, completes a $20.1 billion purchase of Corona maker Grupo Modelo SAB (GMODELOC) and Mexico’s antitrust regulator decides whether to allow more competition in beer. Heineken, with brands including Tecate and Sol, is studying plans to build its seventh brewery in Mexico by 2016, assuming growth continues and the government doesn’t raise beer taxes.

 

“We want to gain a lot of market share here in Mexico,” said Busain, president and chief executive officer of Heineken’s Cuauhtemoc Moctezuma unit. “When you have a combination of the positive demographics and the economic growth and you have every year about 1 million people reaching the drinking age, that’s where you need to be.”

 

While Busain declined to say how much Heineken might spend on a new plant, a brewery of the size being considered typically would cost as much as 400 million euros ($534 million), he said. The company is studying possible locations.

 

Key Market

 

“Given the importance of the country, given the fact that we export a lot to the United States, at a certain moment you might have spare capacity in the south, but it would be pretty expensive to bring it to the U.S.,” Busain said.

 

AB InBev, based in Leuven, Belgium, completed its purchase of the half of Modelo it didn’t already own on June 4, setting up a Mexican showdown with Heineken. The Belgian brewer also sold Modelo’s U.S. business, including a Mexican brewery near the Texas border, as part of an agreement with the U.S. Justice Department.

 

Laura Vallis, a spokeswoman for AB InBev, didn’t immediately respond to e-mailed requests for comment.

 

Modelo, Mexico’s largest brewer, still has three breweries in northern Mexico, which according to Busain is Heineken’s stronghold.

 

“The coming years will be very interesting here,” said Busain, who has been in Mexico since early 2012 following stints in the Netherlands, France, Egypt, Burundi and Congo, the former Zaire.

 

Gaining Ground

 

Heineken has been winning back market share it lost to Modelo in 2011, according to Lauren Torres, an analyst at HSBC Holdings Plc. Modelo’s domestic volume slid 0.3 percent last year after climbing 6.1 percent in 2011.

 

“There were some mishaps in the first couple of years when they did lose some market share,” Torres said in a telephone interview from New York. “But as a result of new initiatives in marketing and distribution, they’ve gained it back.”

 

Marcela Cristo, a spokeswoman for Modelo, declined to comment.

 

Mexico’s Federal Competition Commission extended a deadline to decide whether exclusive beer distribution agreements held by Heineken and Modelo run afoul of the nation’s antitrust rules. A decision is now expected around the end of the month.

 

Antitrust Risk

 

In a worst-case scenario, a finding against the two beer giants could lead to an 8 percent volume decline in Mexico for Heineken and a 12 percent short-term drop in its Mexican earnings before interest and taxes, according to Trevor Stirling, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein in London. That could lead to as much as a 1.5 percent reduction in the Dutch brewer’s total earnings per share, Stirling wrote in a June 10 research report.

 

Heineken has been cooperating with the commission’s investigation, Busain said. He declined to comment on potential outcomes.

 

“If there would be a ruling that would dramatically change the rules of the game, we will be prepared to play the game according to these new rules,” Busain said. “That would be far less impactful to our business than a lot of people might assume.”

 

Heineken may adapt its U.S. marketing icon for Dos Equis, the “Most Interesting Man in the World,” to sell beer in Mexico as well, Busain said.

 

Beer Taxes

 

Busain said Heineken is watching closely whether beer taxes will rise as President Enrique Pena Nieto prepares to propose a tax overhaul in the second half of the year. Mexico temporarily raised excise duties on beer to 26.5 percent from 25 percent in 2010 with a plan to lower them to 26 percent in 2013, according to the Finance Ministry. The ministry said late last year that the rate wouldn’t be lowered this year.

 

An aide with the Finance Ministry’s press office declined to comment.

 

“It’s important for us, and I think it’s also important for the reputation of the Mexican government,” Busain said. “Further investments will absolutely depend on us knowing that we operate in an environment where they will not shoot from the hip.”

 

 

——

Whyte & Mackay Americas engages BBG to represent Scotch whisky portfolio

 

Source: DBR

18 June 2013

 

Whyte & Mackay Americas, a wholly owned subsidiary of Scotland-based alcoholic beverages company Whyte & Mackay, has selected Blackheath Beverage Group (BBG) to represent Whyte & Mackay’s Scotch whiskey portfolio in the US.

 

Formed in August 2012, BBG uses its proprietary sales force and marketing team to help increase the business of spirits brand owners and suppliers.

 

Under the new partnership, BBG will immediately work with Whyte & Mackay team to help drive the growth of the Scotch brands in the country.

 

Whyte & Mackay Americas vice president Jorge Gutierrez said Dalmore and Jura malt whiskies have been on a fast track in an outstanding category.

 

“Cluny Blended Scotch Whisky is also growing strongly despite an overall segment decline,” Gutierrez added.

 

“Blackheath have put together an experienced, energetic team that we believe will help to increase our market penetration and accelerate the development of our brands in the US market.”

 

BBG CEO Jay Harkins said he could not be happier than to have the opportunity to work with the Whyte & Mackay team and represent such outstanding brands in the marketplace.

 

“In combination the Blackheath and Whyte & Mackay sales infrastructures will ensure that Dalmore, Jura, Cluny and John Barr continue to outperform the market,” Harkins added.

 

 

——

Drinking alcohol to shrink?

 

Source: Fox News

By Karen Ansel, R.D.

June 17, 2013

 

Alcohol and your weight have a tricky relationship. So tricky, in fact, that experts have had a tough time nailing down exactly why some women wind up with a beer gut (or butt) while others drink daily and never seem to gain a pound.

 

Here’s what we know: Your average drink-beer, wine, martini, pick your poison-is usually a combination of carbs, sugar and ethanol (pure alcohol). When it goes down the hatch, it makes a pit stop at your stomach, where some of the alcohol is absorbed through the lining and into your bloodstream, giving you that initial buzz. The carbs and sugar go the traditional digestive route, while ethanol, a toxin, is diverted to the liver.

 

This is when that innocent little drink starts messing with your internal fat incinerator. Ethanol has no nutritional value, so your body burns it off first. That means any remaining calories in your stomach-whether they’re from the margarita or the chips and guacamole you had with it-will likely be stored as fat.

 

And the more fattening the foods you eat, the easier the calories are to store. (Bear in mind that research published in Physiology & Behavior found that alcohol makes us focus on immediate pleasure and ignore the consequences, which often results in eating junk food.) Unlike protein and carbs, which require some energy for the body to break down and store, fat can directly deposit itself, so those chips are first in line to be plastered to your thighs.

 

Still, the situation might not be as bleak as it appears, because the real problem may not be drinking itself, but how often and how hard we hit the bottle.

 

A 2010 study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine may be the best news for booze since the 21st Amendment. Researchers found that women who had one or two alcoholic drinks a day were actually less likely to gain weight than those who shunned the sauce. And they did it while consuming more calories overall (from food and drink) than both heavy drinkers and teetotalers.

 

Short of striking a deal with the devil, how did they manage to pull that off? Researchers believe that the bodies of long-term moderate drinkers somehow adapt to metabolize alcohol differently than heavy or occasional drinkers. They use more energy, burning the calories in the drink-or even more than that-while digesting it, Dr. Lu Wang, the lead researcher of the study and an instructor in medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, said.

 

Researchers are still working out the specifics of how and why this happens, but they’ve figured out that for women who drink up to eight ounces of an alcoholic beverage a day, those calories simply don’t end up as extra fat.

 

Of course, there’s a catch. Women who bank their daily drinks for weekends or girls’ nights out don’t qualify for the free-calorie plan (and among the 18-to-25 crowd, this “binge” behavior is on the rise, according to a 2009 Addiction study).

 

“Your body adjusts metabolically to the amount you drink, and when you don’t drink regularly, your body can’t adjust,” Wang said.

 

Instead of learning to disregard those nutritionally empty calories, your body automatically stores them-as fat. It’s akin to tossing old clothes you don’t wear into the back of your closet, only your body doesn’t have the good sense to hide the junk. It tends to store the fat front and center, in your belly.

 

Booze Clues

 

Evidence suggests that moderate drinkers also tend to practice healthier habits than teetotalers. If you’re used to having three or four drinks every week as part of your diet, you’re probably compensating for them with fewer calories elsewhere.

 

“These women know how to moderate how much they drink, so it makes sense that they’d moderate what they eat as well,” Robert Klesges, a professor of preventive medicine at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, said. The Archives study found that these women also exercise more, which knocks off additional calories.

 

Another thing that helped: The women in the Archives study were served no more than two four-ounce glasses of wine or two 1.5-ounce shots of liquor a day. In real life, you’re likely to be handed far more than that by a bartender or waitress-20 to 45 percent more, according to a 2009 study in the journal Alcohol. And we’re not much better when left to our own devices.

 

“Eyeballing the right amount is very difficult,” William C. Kerr, a senior scientist at the Alcohol Research Group in Emeryville, Calif., said. “Most of us don’t even know how much we should be shooting for, so overpouring is typical.”

 

It’s especially easy to overdo it with vino, given that the average wineglass these days looks big enough to hold a school of fish. So a bottle of light beer may be your best bet.

 

“Unlike wine and mixed drinks, it’s portion controlled-the bottle is right there with the calories printed on it,” says Lisa Young, R.D., author of “The Portion Teller Plan.” “It eliminates the guesswork.”

 

 

——

A glass of wine a day while pregnant ‘will not harm your baby’

 

A glass of wine a day will not harm your baby and may actually be good for a child’s development, researchers have found.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Hayley Dixon

17 Jun 2013

 

Moderate drinking of between three and seven glasses of alcohol a week does not harm a child’s foetal neurodevelopment, it is said.

 

In tests on balance, a marker of development, children whose parents’ drank more actually performed better.

 

However, social advantage may have had an influence as more affluent, better educated older women tend to consume more alcohol during pregnancy, the team from Bristol University said.

 

The findings are likely to add to the confusion surrounding alcohol and pregnancy, and directly contradict the advice of the Department of Health, who warn pregnant women to abstain altogether or to limit consumption to a glass of wine a week.

 

Almost 7,000 ten-year-olds underwent a 20 minute assessment which tested dynamic balance, by walking on a beam, and static balance, including standing on one leg with their eyes closed. 70 per cent of the mothers, whose drinking had been monitored at 18 weeks and again after birth at 47 months, had drunk no alcohol while pregnant.

 

One in four mothers-to-be were either low consumers of alcohol, drinking around a glass a week, or moderate consumers, drinking between three and seven glasses.

 

Nearly one in 20 drank more, and around one in seven of these women binge drank four or more glasses at any one time.

 

Four years after the pregnancy, more than 28 per cent of the women were not drinking any alcohol, and over half were drinking the moderate amount.

 

In general, the mothers who drank more, but who were not binge drinkers, were better off and older; the mothers who binge drank were less affluent and younger.

 

More than half of the fathers’ said they drank one or more glasses a week during the pregnancy, and one in five said they drank one or more glasses a day.

 

Higher total alcohol consumption before and after pregnancy, as well as higher consumption by the father during the first three months of pregnancy, were associated with better performance by the children, particularly in static balance.

 

There was no link found between genetic predisposition to low levels of alcohol consumption and the ability to balance.

 

Professor John Macleod, of the School of Social and Community Medicine at Bristol University, said: “Low to moderate alcohol consumption did not seem to interfere with a child’s ability to balance for any of the three components assessed.”

 

But he added that in the women “moderate alcohol intake was a marker for social advantage, which may itself be the key factor in better balance, possibly overriding subtle harmful effects of moderate alcohol use”.

 

Drinking during pregnancy can causes foetal alcohol syndrome, which can leave children with impaired IQ and low birth weight, leading to severe learning difficulties and addiction problems in adulthood, previous studies have shown.

 

Higher than average intake has also been linked to sleep disorders, hyperactivity, attention deficit disorder and poorer co-ordination and balance in long term studies.

 

Whilst the side effects are more common with heavier drinkers, the Government advises women to abstain on the grounds that not enough is known about the effects moderate consumption.

 

 

——

China demands action from France as wine students attacked in Bordeaux

 

An apparently racist attack on six Chinese wine students in Bordeaux threatened to spiral into an international incident yesterday as China demanded France take appropriate measures to protect its citizens.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Henry Samuel, Paris

17 Jun 2013

 

A French minister said the Bordeaux assault, which left one female victim requiring facial surgery after being hit by a flying bottle of champagne, had harmed France’s image abroad.

 

China’s foreign ministry expressed “strong condemnation” over the attack on the students early on Saturday in the southwestern wine-producing region.

 

Hua Chunying, a ministry spokesman said China had urged French authorities to “properly handle the case, bring the perpetrators to justice and take effective measures to protect Chinese citizens’ safety and rights in France”.

 

Three people, aged 19 and 20, remained in police custody, under formal investigation for “acts of violence” with three aggravating factors: using or threatening to use a weapon, being drunk, and discrimination linked to race.

 

One of the victims is the daughter of a retired senior government official, the head of the student’s school said.

 

The assault comes at a sensitive moment for the French wine sector as it seeks to woo new wine lovers in China, now the globe’s fifth-largest wine consumer, Bordeaux’s top export market and the third biggest market for French wines.

 

Up to 2,000 Chinese buyers are currently in Bordeaux to attend the world’s largest wine fair, Vinexpo, which opened a day after the attack.

 

Overshadowing the event is a trade dispute between the EU and China, which has accused Europe of dumping cheap wine and hurting domestic producers. Its threat to impose higher levies on EU wines is an apparent tit-for-tat response to Brussels’ decision to slap tariffs on Chinese solar panel imports.

 

In a bid to defuse tensions over the student attack, agriculture minister Stéphane Le Foll said that it had sullied France’s image.

 

“It’s an unspeakable act,” he said at Vinexpo. “It’s the image of France which has been dented with these xenophobic attitudes.”

 

The students were attacked at their home in Hostens, a small village of 1,300 inhabitants about 30 miles south of Bordeaux.

 

In the Bordeaux region, locals have been dismayed by Chinese investors buying up chateaux. Around 40 are currently in Chinese hands, with one new chateau or merchant reportedly bought every month.

 

Concern has meanwhile grown in China in recent months over a spate of thefts and muggings targeting Chinese nationals in France. In March, a group of 23 Chinese tourists were robbed in a restaurant shortly after they landed at Paris’ Roissy airport.

 

“It’s becoming a scourge. Since last year, we’ve seen attacks almost daily,” said Jena-François Zhou, who runs Ansel Travel, which specialises in welcoming Chinese tourists to Paris.

 

The number of Chinese tourists in France is growing fast – 1.1 million this year with two million expected in 2014, and they spend around 60 per cent on shopping, notably luxury goods.

 

 

——

China Thirsts for More European Wine

 

Distributors Stock Up Amid Fear EU Trade Fight Will Drive Up Import Tariffs; Possible Boon for Other Regions

 

Source: WSJ

By JASON CHOW

Jun 17th

 

Chinese wine distributors are scrambling to secure bottles from Europe, fearing that a trade spat between the European Union and China-the world’s fifth-largest wine market-might lead to significantly higher tariffs on imported European wine.

 

Six Chinese students were attacked in the French wine-making region of Bordeaux at a time when the budding wine trade between China and France is becoming increasingly fraught with tension. The WSJ’s Jason Chow has the story.

 

“Every import company is trying to finish the duty clearance as soon as possible to avoid paying more taxes,” said Jared Liu, chief executive of the online wine retailer Yes My Wine, which sold more than 400 million yuan ($65 million) in wine last year. Mr. Liu said that his company, based in Shanghai, is spending an extra 10 million yuan in the coming weeks to make sure all its wines in bonded warehouses-a secured area for storing dutiable goods-are released.

 

“We don’t have details on how much [the tax] will be raised, but the rumor we hear is that the policy will be deployed within 60 days and [the increase] could be very high.”

 

China earlier this month launched an antidumping probe of European wine in response to the EU’s move to increase tariffs on Chinese-made solar panels.

 

The investigation, wine distributors say, could lead to a substantial increase in duties.

More

 

Tensions Simmer After Attack on Chinese Students in France

 

Wine merchants are taking a wait-and-see approach. But Mr. Liu said people in the government are telling him that taxes are in the pipeline, hence his moves.

 

But extra tariffs on European wine could be a boon for producers from other regions who are ready to fill China’s empty glasses if the trade spat drags on.

 

China has accused Europe of flooding the country with cheap wine. Currently, all imported wines to China are subject to taxes that amount to about 48% of the declared value. A punitive tariff would be charged in addition to that rate if China’s antidumping probe concludes unfavorably for the EU.

 

Ian Park, chief executive of importer Summergate Wines, said that domestic Chinese wine producers have been complaining for months that cheap wine from Europe, especially Spain, has invaded the Chinese market. Only in the past year, he said, have cheap Spanish wines appeared on supermarket shelves at the equivalent of $3 a bottle.

 

“This runs deeper than solar panels,” he said.

 

The big beneficiaries of the trade spat will be Chile and New Zealand, he said, because both countries have bilateral free-trade agreements with China over wine.

 

Mr. Liu of Yes My Wine said he expects a major increase in the tariffs and estimates his current tax payment would double, pushing drinkers to simply switch to other countries’ wines.

 

Expo visitors in Beijing attended a French wine tasting on June 6. Distributors in China are snapping up European bottles of wine, fearing that a China-EU trade dispute could lead to higher import tariffs.

 

“We are looking more into suppliers from other countries like Australia, the U.S. and Chile,” Mr. Liu said. “The market won’t change. People will drink. But the structure of the market would change a lot.”

 

China imported 266 million liters of bottled wine last year, an increase of 10% from the previous year, with more than two-thirds coming from the EU, according to an industry data provider, International Wine and Spirit Research. China has a particular fondness for French wines, which made up 48% of imported bottles.

 

Should extra taxes turn Chinese drinkers away from Europe, that could open the door for California, whose wine industry has been heavily marketing itself to try to break into the China market. The state’s wine industry in April even joined a trade mission to China with Gov. Jerry Brown.

 

“Half of the drinking population in China isn’t even aware that California makes wines, so we’re still building awareness,” said Linsey Gallagher, director of international marketing at Wine Institute, a group that represents California wineries. “If we are cheaper than Old World wines, especially France, then we are poised to benefit.”

 

Meanwhile, fine-wine merchants in Hong Kong who deal in prestigious bottles from France’s Bordeaux and Burgundy regions say the increased duty would be negligible on their business. The bigger problem for them is Beijing’s crackdown on smuggling.

 

Hong Kong has emerged as a regional wine hub, largely because wines are significantly cheaper as the former British colony doesn’t charge import duties. The city’s merchants say a large portion of the wines sold are bought by wealthy mainland Chinese clients who then hire individuals to smuggle them across the border.

 

According to Greg Brossard at wine merchant Goedhuis & Co. in Hong Kong, the mainland Chinese government has been more vigilant during the past six months in checking individuals who cross the border multiple times, and is on the lookout for illegal cargo.

 

The crackdown has damped sales, Mr. Brossard said. “A part of our business is affected by that,” he said.

 

 

——

New twist for traditional bottle stoppers

 

The Helix cork can be unscrewed and, for those not intent on finishing the bottle, replaced

 

Source: The Times

David Sanderson

June 17 2013

 

The vintage way to seal wine bottles may be making a comeback with the development of a cork that does not need a corkscrew.

 

Cork, taken from the bark of a species of oak, was long the only material used by the wine trade, but when it began to be blamed for “cork taint”, winemakers looked for alternatives.

 

Plastic stoppers were developed but the screw top, which was adopted by New World vineyards then many others except the most exclusive, became the most popular choice. There is no taint and, if need be, a bottle can easily be resealed.

 

Now a cork has been developed that offers just the same convenience. The Helix cork and bottle have a thread finish that allows drinkers to twist open and close, without the need for a corkscrew.

 

The Helix, which is to be unveiled today at the International VinExpo wine fair in Bordeaux, could be in shops in four months, according to its creators – a Portuguese cork manufacturer and American bottle maker.

 

They hope that it will revive the popularity of the traditional material, which, they said, drinkers have always preferred.

 

“For centuries cork and glass has been a winning combination in the wine market,” Erik Bouts, a senior executive at American bottle maker O-I said. “Cork is still by far the preferred stopper. It has the highest-quality image in the market and now we have made it easier. And it is still the most sustainable option.”

 

Granulated cork from Portugal has been used, which Mr Bouts said would offer greater elasticity and reliability than standard stoppers. He said wine stored in bottles with Helix corks had shown no alteration to the taste, aroma or colour after 26 months.

 

He said he hoped that distillers, who have mostly abandoned corks, would also see the benefits of the Helix.

 

 

——

Hailstorms decimate Loire vines

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Monday 17 June 2013

A hail storm at in the early hours of Monday morning has caused widespread damage across much of the Loire communes Vouvray and Reugny.

 

The damage has been severe in some areas, particularly around the town of Tours, with 30% to 100% of crops reported destroyed.

 

Up to 1000ha across Vouvray have been affected – somewhat under half the 2,300ha appellation.

 

Hail stones ‘as big as eggs’ were reported by numerous French weather stations.

 

Local fire stations were reporting up to 260 call-outs across 40 communes in the region, to deal with issues ranging from fallen trees to broken roofs and flooded cellars. 13,500 households were without electricity this morning.

 

‘It’s a scene of desolation. There is practically no vegetation left on the vines’, said Philippe Thierry, director of Alliance Loire in Vouvray, a cooperative with 35 producers. Half of Alliance’s members have been affected.

 

Thierry said that although it is a late-flowering season, the damage is not just to leaves and flowers but the vines themselves.

 

While some producers keep stocks from previous years and others have insurance, buy by no means all are proteced. ‘For those that aren’t, this will be very very tough,’ Thierry said.

 

Christian Feray, winemaker at Chateau de Montcontour, the largest winemaker in the appellation, said his crop had been entirely destroyed by the storm.

 

‘And even next year’s harvest will be compromised, as the vines will not be able to recover in time. The storm lasted just 10 minutes but destroyed everything,’ Feray told local reporters.

 

Francois Pinon of Domaine Francois Pinon has also reported all his vineyards have been hit, with near total loss.

 

Hail warnings remain in place for much of northern France.

 

 

——

Q&A: Francis Ford Coppola Explains His Passion For Wine (Excerpt)

 

Source: Forbes

Jun 17th

 

Filmmaker Francis Ford Coppola is still best known for his movies, especially his early successes Patton, Apocalypse Now, and the mega-hits, The Godfather and the Godfather Part II, which have become two of the most lauded and popular films in history. All of these critically acclaimed bombshells were made in the 1970s, and while Coppola has continued to make films ever since, he has significantly turned his attention to a host of other commercial ventures, most notably winemaking. He has also opened a few boutique hotels in which he has been heavily involved, from Central America to Italy, and I wrote about his latest Italian property, Palazzo Margherita, here at Forbes.com.

 

I recently had the pleasure of interviewing Coppola about wine and his passion for it, and today we get to hear from him in his own words.

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/larryolmsted/2013/06/17/qa-francis-ford-coppola-talks-about-his-passion-for-wine/

 

 

——

The Steve Jobs Of Wine: Winemaker Paul Hobbs (Excerpt)

 

Source: Forbes

Jun 17th

 

The Steve Jobs of Wine is an apt metaphor to describe the ardent exactitude of winemaker and consultant Paul Hobbs.  He’s a quality fanatic. Twice named Wine Personality of the Year by Robert Parker, Hobbs was first hired by Robert Mondavi for his expertise in oak aging, he then moved on to Opus One and later Simi Winery.  

 

Hobbs is also credited with recognizing, despite the skeptics, the winemaking potential in Argentina, (while we were all distracted and busy swooning over California). His efforts helped bring that region into global focus. Now he’s busy running Paul Hobbs Winery and Vina Cobos in Argentina. He’s also consulting, sharing his knack for finding good dirt with winemakers across the globe. Given his global perspective I was curious to hear his thoughts on the business of wine today, the role of critics and where he sees new frontiers.

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/katiebell/2013/06/17/the-steve-jobs-of-wine-winemaker-paul-hobbs/

 

 

——

The Pinot Paradise of the Cool Sonoma Coast

 

A visit with David Hirsch, the visionary behind the area’s first vineyard

 

Source: WSJ

By JAY MCINERNEY

Jun 14th

 

YOUR PHONE STOPPED working more than an hour ago; your GPS and Google GOOG +1.26% Maps are useless out here, some 2½ road-hours west of Healdsburg, Calif., the jumping-off point for Sonoma County wine pilgrims. Napa, with its thronged tasting rooms and its trophy architecture, might as well be a thousand miles away. From the coast, the road slaloms up the ridge and eventually turns into a dirt track halfway to your destination. At some point you cross the San Andreas fault. The rolling, camel-colored meadows are punctuated by groves of fir and redwood. The telephone poles alongside the dirt road are the only signs of civilization. Just when you think you’re completely lost, manicured rows of bright green vines appear on the hillside ahead.

 

When I finally found David Hirsch, he was in a field just off the road, struggling with a faulty irrigation valve, sporting a battered straw fedora, a very faded plaid shirt with a prominent hole in the front and faded jeans-an outfit I recognized from several pictures taken in recent years. Since leaving the apparel business some 25 years ago, he doesn’t seem to have spent much time thinking about clothes.

Oenofile: Wines From David Hirsch, and Made With His Grapes

 

When Mr. Hirsch bought this thousand-acre ridgetop ranch in 1978 he was thinking about trees rather than grapes, “about silviculture rather than viticulture,” he said, the cadences of his native Bronx still present after 50 years in California. In case you don’t know what silviculture is, he will tell you, with reference to George W.S. Trow, the late New Yorker cult culture critic, along with a sidebar on the Austrian theosophist Rudolf Steiner and a disquisition on the complex geology of the property. For a man of the soil, Mr. Hirsch’s frame of reference is pretty esoteric. Over lunch in the rustic house designed by his Czech-born wife, Marie, with views of the Pacific framed by redwoods, he waxed poetic about viticulture: “Heat feeds the sugar. Light feeds the acidity. Heat is sex. Light is intelligence. To make good wine you need them in balance.”

 

Mr. Hirsch originally had ambitions to restore the forested landscape that had been badly degraded. Only hints of the redwood forest that had once blanketed the ridges remained. “I called it Appalachia,” Mr. Hirsch said. “First it was clear-cut, then grazed by sheep and seriously eroded. The soil went down the hillsides.” The topsoil was thin to nonexistent, but Mr. Hirsch knew that vines survive and thrive where other crops can’t.

The Off Duty Summer 50

 

The beach is beckoning, but before you hit the shore, consult this guide to 50 seaside essentials-from swank swimsuits to ice-cold canned sake, comfy snorkel fins to video-recording binoculars.

 

Almost on a whim, he planted grapes in 1980, with the help of his friend Jim Beauregard, whose family had pioneered grape growing in the Santa Cruz Mountains, south of San Francisco. Mr. Hirsch was a wine enthusiast who traveled regularly to Burgundy. “Back in 1972, Romanée-Conti was $324 a case,” he recalled. “I almost bought a house in Beaune.” Instead he decided to purchase a ranch on the Sonoma Coast, far closer to his home and his clothing business in San Francisco. But he didn’t forget Burgundy entirely; the first vines he planted were Pinot Noir, the native red grape of the Côte d’Or. (He also planted Riesling but eventually grafted those vines to Pinot.) The former importer and clothing manufacturer discovered his inner farmer and took to grape growing full-time.

 

In the years since, Hirsch Vineyards has become one of the most celebrated sites in Northern California wine lore, a kind of de facto grand cru, and others, including Flowers, Marcassin, Martinelli and Failla have followed Hirsch’s lead in planting Pinot Noir and Chardonnay on the ridges above the fog line of the Sonoma Coast. This may be the best place in Northern California for these cool-climate grapes.

 

Early buyers for Hirsch’s grapes included Kendall-Jackson and Sea Ridge Winery. “It was just a hobby through the ’80s,” Mr. Hirsch said. But in 1994, the three magi came calling: Burt Williams of Williams Selyem, Ted Lemon of Littorai and Steve Kistler of Kistler Vineyards. “Burt and Ted and Steve were in this tasting group,” he said. “They heard about us or tasted some wines from the vineyard, and they came up and liked what they saw.” The three all contracted to buy grapes from Hirsch and went on to make a series of Hirsch-designated wines that garnered very favorable attention and put Hirsch, and the Sonoma Coast, on the map.

 

Meanwhile, Walt and Joan Flowers, who owned a-you can’t make this up-nursery in Pennsylvania, had purchased 321 acres on a ridgetop just to the east and planted vineyards, followed closely by cult winemaker Helen Turley and her husband, John Wetlaufer, who established Marcassin Vineyards, releasing their first vintage in 1996. The surrounding area has clearly become the Gold Coast of a new California Côte d’Or, although the wines vary in style and it’s not easy to characterize a regional flavor profile.

 

“It’s like individuals from the same clan or village,” Mr. Hirsch said. “You have group characteristics: These are areas on the coastal band and we have a strong maritime influence. But the individual characteristics can be just as distinct. We have a commonality with Marcassin and Martinelli. It’s really hard to farm here.”

 

“Right over there,” he said, pointing west down the ridge, “the Pacific and North American plates come into contact and grind away to create an incredible mélange of every kind of soil type, from heavy clay to sand, and all kinds of rock has been thrown up: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.” It’s hard to generalize about Hirsch, or the area, but probably safe to say this geological and meteorological diversity helps account for the wines’ complexity.

 

Last year, the area around Hirsch was recognized as a distinct American Viticultural Area, the Fort Ross-Seaview AVA, although whether any of the wineries within the area will rush to use this name on their label is unclear. It’s not exactly a catchy phrase. What is clear is that the Sonoma Coast AVA, a gerrymandered sprawl of more than 500,000 acres, is far too broadly drawn and includes vineyards nowhere near the ocean.

 

In 2002, David Hirsch decided to start vinifying and bottling some of his own grapes-a task currently presided over by winemaker Ross Cobb, who formerly worked at Williams Selyem and at Flowers and also makes several acclaimed Pinots under his own name. Mr. Hirsch’s daughter, Jasmine, is learning the ropes while handling the winery’s marketing. Mr. Hirsch continues to sell his grapes to Littorai, Williams Selyem, Breggo, Kutch, Failla, Lioco, B. Kosuge and Siduri. Tasting through these bottlings presents a great opportunity to consider the influences of winemaking and terroir. Suffice it to say that Hirsch wines seem to have a more earthy, more savory, less fruit-driven character than most California Pinots, and bright acidity. They’re some of the most distinctive and best in California, which is why finding a bottle of Hirsch is only slightly easier than finding the winery.

 

 

——

New Jersey Wines Get Boost

 

Source: Associated Press

Jun 17th

 

A state Senate panel has unanimously approved a measure that aims to bolster New Jersey’s wine industry.

 

The bill would create the New Jersey Wine Board and make it responsible for facilitating growth in the state’s wine industry through advertisements, research and education. The board also could take part in promoting revenue-producing activities such as growing grapes or producing wine. The measure also increases funds for the board’s efforts to include revenue from sales of alcoholic cider. Revenue from wine, sparkling wine and vermouth to support the efforts will also increase.

 

The Economic Growth Committee approved the measure Monday. It now heads to the Senate’s Budget and Appropriations committee.

 

The bill’s sponsor says New Jersey wines are good enough to compete with those produced around the world.

 

 

——

Fraud charges filed against wine exec Chris Edwards

 

Source: Napa Valley Register

KERANA TODOROV

Jun 17th

 

A 48-year-old Napa man has been indicted for fraud in federal court for stealing $900,000 from an online wine fulfillment company, according to federal prosecutors. He is now considered a fugitive, federal officials said.

 

Martin Christopher Edwards – known as Chris – was the former vice president and general manager of The Wine Tasting Network. He is suspected of creating a fictitious company to provide tax compliance services to the Wine Tasting Network.

 

Prosecutors allege Edwards, who ran unsuccessfully for Napa City Council in 2003 and 2005, created fraudulent invoices and directed The Wine Tasting Network to make payments totaling $900,000 between May 2010 and October 2012 to the fictitious company, Dufrane Compliance Trust, according to federal prosecutors.

 

Edwards allegedly deposited the funds into an account and withdrew the money for his own personal use, including the June 2012 purchase of a 2008 BMW, prosecutors said.

 

Edwards was indicted on May 30 in United States District Court after a two-month investigation. On Monday, he failed to appear in court in San Francisco and is considered a fugitive, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office.

 

The May 30 complaint contains 23 counts, including mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering, according to the filing unsealed Monday.

 

Edwards faces up to 20 years in federal prison for each count of mail and wire fraud and 10 years imprisonment for each count of money laundering.

 

Edwards also faces two fines of $250,000 or twice the gross gain stemming from the offenses, plus restitution, according to the federal officials.

 

 

——

Pernod Ricard USA Appoints Jim Green to Vice President, Commercial and Channel Strategy

 

Source: BusinessWire

June 17, 2013

 

Pernod Ricard USA, the premium spirits and wine company in the U.S., today announced a key appointment designed to further strengthen the company’s powerful Route to Market.

 

Jim Green, an industry veteran who joined Pernod Ricard USA in 2011, has been named Vice President, Commercial and Channel Strategy. In this new position, Green will be responsible for developing the company’s next generation distributor model, sales structure, and overall Route to Market approach for both the spirits and wines business. He also will lead the commercial integration of any new partnerships and acquisitions.

 

“Our Route to Market is a key asset for Pernod Ricard USA, and we must continually enhance the competitive advantage it delivers,” said Bryan Fry, the company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. “Our current distributor contracts were crafted after the company’s acquisition of ABSOLUT Vodka in 2008. Since then, we’ve expanded our portfolio and increased our market share, and I am confident that Jim’s leadership will put our premium spirits and wine business on a path toward even stronger performance in the years ahead.”

 

Prior to this position, Green was Vice President, National Customer Solutions and Activation, working closely with Marty Crane, Senior Vice President, Spirits Sales, Pernod Ricard USA, to transform the company’s sales strategy, capabilities and ways of working with its distributors. Before joining Pernod Ricard, Green held executive positions at Diageo, Marriott and Kodak.

 

Green will report to Stephen O’Neill, Senior Vice President, Communications and Transformation, Pernod Ricard USA.

 

 

——

TGI Fridays Underpaid Workers For Short Days, Suit Says

 

Source: Law 360

By Dan Prochilo

June 17, 2013

 

A former employee of a California TGI Fridays accused her ex-employer of telling employees to go home on days when business was slow but failing to properly compensate them for showing up, in a proposed wage-and-hour class action filed in California state court Friday.

 

Maribel Portillo, an Inglewood, Calif., resident who worked in an unspecified position for the chain’s Los Angeles location, also said in her complaint that workers were obliged to attend meetings that they were either not paid for or paid less than their normal wages for.

 

Portillo says the unlawful acts “represent the official policies of TGIF or those whose edicts or acts may fairly be said to represent said official policies.”

 

The complaint against Carrollton, Texas-based TGI Fridays accused the company of a series of violations of Golden State wage-and-hour laws, including failing to pay former workers “without abatement or reduction” after they left the job or were fired, and failure to pay them in timely manner.

 

Filed on behalf of all workers for TGI Fridays’ California restaurants who were not overtime exempt during the undefined statute of limitations period, the suit estimated there were more than 800 people within the class.

 

Portillo said the chain not only broke multiple California labor codes, but its conduct also qualified as “unfair” and “deceptive” business practices that violated the state’s Business and Professions Code, entitling the workers to further restitution.

 

Portillo, who worked for the company in L.A. from January to mid-July 2012, asked the court to grant an injunction preventing the chain’s California locations from failing to pay employees all the reporting-time compensation they are owed and the additional pay they are due for being made to wait for their final paychecks.

 

The suit likewise requested damages, including interest dating to when the amounts in dispute were first owed, attorneys’ fees and the costs from the suit.

 

A TGI Fridays representative and an attorney for Portillo were not immediately available to comment on Monday.

 

The chain was the defendant in an August 2011 putative class action in California state court filed by a former bartender, who said the company unlawfully made hourly employees add up and distribute their tips while they were off the clock.

 

The ex-bartender filed suit on behalf of more than 3,000 hourly employees – including bartenders, bar backs, grill cooks, prep cooks, bussers, dishwashers, hosts and servers – who were prohibited from counting and doling out tips collected from tip jars while on the clock, in violation of state wage laws.

 

That suit faulted companywide policies that were developed at the company’s Texas headquarters and passed down to each of its restaurants for the “illegal pay practices.”

 

Just weeks ago, a New Jersey-based TGI Fridays franchisee was hit with a proposed class action after investigators with the Garden State’s Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control accused The Briad Restaurant Group of selling customers bottom-shelf vodka and tequila for top-shelf prices.

 

That suit was filed in early June on behalf of customers who ordered drinks at 12 of Briad’s 16 New Jersey TGI Fridays locations, which were targeted by the investigation, dubbed “Operation Swill,” which had focused on a total of 29 bars and restaurants.

 

TGI Fridays’ corporate franchiser said in a statement that those allegations, if true, ran counter to the values of the company, which would not tolerate actions that eroded customers’ trust and the company’s reputation.

 

The workers in Portillo’s California wage-and-hour case are represented by Neal Fialkow and Sahag Majarian.

 

Counsel information for TGI Friday’s was not available.

 

The case is Maribel Portillo et al. v. TGI Fridays Inc., et al., case number BC512119 in state Superior Court in California.

 

 

——

Brewers question Tesco strong alcohol deal

 

Source: the drinks business

by Andy Young

17th June, 2013

 

Some brewers in Scotland have criticised the deal that has reportedly been made between Tesco and West Dumbartonshire Council, that will see the supermarket chain ban the sale of some strong drinks.

 

TescoTesco will apparently stop selling beers, ciders and alcopops with an abv above 5.5% in order to see the new store in West Dumbartonshire granted a licence.

 

But with the sale of wines and spirits unaffected by the deal, some brewers have questioned the validity and the motive behind the deal.

 

Gerald Michaluk, who brews at 6% abv beer at his Arran Brewery, has said it is “nonsensical” that his award-winning beer will be banned from this particular Tesco store.

 

He told the Herald Scotland: “This is absolutely nonsensical. A bottle of wine is has an abv of 12%, and if I was in the area and I wanted to get drunk I would just go and get a bottle of that.

 

“I’m very surprised if this would get past European competition regulations. It hurts Scottish producers and its almost like they are saying ‘go and buy French products – ignore local brewers’.

 

“We produce a Scottish beer which has been voted the best in the country, yet we can’t sell it there. It’s just a mad idea.”

 

A West Dunbartonshire Council spokesman said: “Tesco offered up these concessions. We did not impose them.

 

“We have Scotland’s toughest licensing regulations and Tesco came to the board in the knowledge that there is a robust regulation, and offered up a few unusual solutions that you might not have expected in order to take account of the different environment in West Dunbartonshire.”

 

Last week a Tesco spokesman said: “As a responsible retailer of alcohol, we work closely with local councils and the police to address any concerns raised in the communities where we operate.

 

“Where the local authority or police have concerns over high-strength products, they have added conditions to our licence with which we comply.”

 

 

——

English sparkling wine sales help top up Majestic pre-tax profits

 

Source: FT

By Andrea Felsted, Senior Retail Correspondent

Jun 17th

 

Britons have developed a taste for English sparkling wines, a legacy of last year’s summer of celebrations, Majestic Wine said as its pre-tax profit edged up.

 

“It started with the Royal Wedding two years ago, bolstered by the Jubilee and the Olympics,” said Steve Lewis, chief executive, of the increased demand.

 

Majestic sold more than £1m of English sparkling wine last year, up 2 per cent on the year earlier.

 

“This is not inexpensive wine. This retails at £28-£29 a bottle. It seems to have captured consumers’ imagination,” he said of the wine, mostly produced in West Sussex and Kent. The best seller was Nyetimber, produced in West Sussex, which sells at £28 a bottle.

 

Mr Lewis said sales of fine wines, still wine retailing at more than £20 a bottle, were also up 9.4 per cent year on year, as the trend towards entertaining at home continued.

 

“People are buying at £20 to £30 a bottle to consume at home, and a lot of them are entertaining at home,” he said.

 

Pre-tax profit rose from £23.2m to £23.7m in the year to April 1. Total sales fell 2.1 per cent to £274.4m, as Majestic withdrew from the wholesale market to step up its retail expansion.

 

Underlying sales, excluding wholesale, rose 2.6 per cent to £268.6m, while sales from UK stores open at least a year rose 1 per cent.

 

The number of customers rose 56,000 to 624,000, although average spend per transaction was maintained at £128.

 

Mr Lewis said Majestic was looking to further expand its stores. The chain opened 16 stores in the year to April, taking its estate to 193. Majestic would open a further 16 this year, and saw scope for 330 locations in the UK.

 

“We are that rare thing, a retailer who is expanding,” he said.

 

The final dividend is maintained at 11.8p, making a total for the year of 15.8p, up from 15.6p in the year earlier.

 

Diluted earnings per share rose from 26.1p to 26.6p.

 

Majestic said current trading was “in line with our expectations, though as anticipated the year has started slowly reflecting the timing of Easter and the boost given to last year from the Jubilee celebrations”.

 

However, Mr Lewis noted that June, July and August last year were subdued because of the wet weather and the fact that many consumers had celebrated the diamond jubilee.

 

“We think its all to play for,” he said.

 

Philip Dorgan, analyst at Panmure Gordon said: “The current trading statement is actually reassuring, with sales volatile, but good control of margins and costs.”

 

The shares rose 1.6 per cent to close at 462p.

 

 

——

Ohio: Liquor-treat legalization draws fire

 

Source: Columbus Dispatch

By  Alan Johnson

Jun 18th

 

Alcohol-infused Jell-O has long been popular among college students, but it is currently illegal for Ohio liquor and grocery stores to sell intoxicating prepared-food products.

 

Some alcoholic treats – think Jell-O shots, alcohol-infused chocolates and margarita-flavored Popsicles – are tucked away in the voluminous state budget that lawmakers must complete by July 1.

 

Existing Ohio law doesn’t allow the sale of food and confections containing “intoxicating liquor” of more than one-half of 1 percent alcohol by volume. However, the law is largely overlooked, and some products, such as chocolates made with various liquors, are available.

 

State Sen. Cliff Hite, R-Findlay, concerned that Ohio is falling behind other states that allow the sale of alcohol-infused products, inserted a provision into the budget. It would revise the ” mixed beverages” definition to include solids and confections “obtained by mixing any type of whiskey, neutral spirits, brandy, gin, or other distilled spirits with water, juice, or other flavorings and that contain between one-half percent and 21 percent of alcohol by volume.”

 

A fiscal analysis accompanying the bill said the state could reap undetermined additional tax revenue because more products would fall under the mixed-beverage excise tax of $1.20 per gallon of alcohol purchased.

 

But the Columbus chapter of the Drug-Free Action Alliance opposes the budget provision, arguing that it would “legalize and legitimize” products generally unavailable in Ohio that appeal to young people.

 

The provision would cover products not regulated by state law and put them under oversight of the Division of Liquor Control, said Senate spokesman John McClelland.

 

Some alcohol-infused products, such as Jell-O shots, have long been popular in bars and taverns frequented by college students. But they are not sold commercially in liquor and grocery stores.

 

” When you insert language like this, it opens Pandora’s box for food items that are very enticing to kids and can be confusing to parents,” said Marcie Seidel, the executive director of the Columbus chapter of the Drug-Free Action Alliance. “People think there is money to be made on this.”

 

She cited a 2010 Boston University study that showed drinkers of alcoholic gel shots were more likely to be binge drinkers, in part because “the sugary shots mask the bitter taste of alcohol, making it easier for young alcohol users to ingest larger quantities.”

 

Seidel fought this battle before when she worked for Hope Taft, wife of former Gov. Bob Taft. In 2002, Hope Taft spoke out against a Jell-O-shot-type product called Zippers made by a Toledo company. Resulting enforcement efforts by state liquor agents forced the company to move out of the state.

 

A $10 million lawsuit filed by Brian Pearson, one of Zippers’ founders, alleging that Hope Taft improperly used her influence to put him of business was thrown out by an appeals court.

 

Alcohol-infused products are available in other states. Those products include ones made by a Santa Monica, Calif., company called SnoBar. The company offers margarita Popsicles containing tequila and Cosmopolitan Popsicles with vodka and triple sec with up to 14.6 percent alcohol, along with Pink Squirrel and Brandy Alexander ice creams that are up to 10 percent alcohol.

 

Locally, Le Chocoholique at 601 N. High St. in the Short North sells candies with alcohol, but Monica Barr, co-owner of the business, said she didn’t think the law, if passed, would affect her business much. “There’s so little alcohol in them. And the ones that have some alcohol inside don’t sell very well anyway.”

 

 

——

Texas: Craft beer bills now officially the law

 

Source: Chron

Monday, June 17, 2013

 

Whatever you think of the vetoes or the special session action, this is unequivocally good news.

 

Happy hour started Friday afternoon for Texas brewers.

 

Gov. Rick Perry signed five bills representing the most comprehensive overhaul in two decades of how beer is packaged and sold across the state.

 

Thus, effective immediately, shipping breweries such as Houston’s Saint Arnold can sell a set amount of beer directly to customers, although they must consume it on-site.

 

And brewpubs like San Antonio’s Freetail can package and sell some of their products for distribution in other retail outlets. The latter change gives Texas restaurants that make their own beer the same ability to sell off-site as many out-of-state brewpubs.

 

“This is a great moment for craft brewers in Texas,” Saint Arnold founder Brock Wagner said. “It’s the first real reform we’ve seen in beer law, for craft brewers, since the brewpub bill.” He referred to the 1993 legislation that authorized licensed restaurants to make and sell beer for sale on-site.

 

The Texas Craft Brewers Guild hailed the signings as a “progressive step forward in making Texas the epicenter of craft beer development and growth” and predicted the law changes will mean not just more beer on store shelves but also “more jobs for Texans, increased tourism and greater tax revenue for the state.”

 

In Houston, the law allowing on-site consumption at shipping breweries would have the biggest immediate potential impact. Saint Arnold, for example, plans to begin offering “special and limited edition brews” for sale during its weekday and Saturday tours.

 

The basic tour at Saint Arnold’s won’t change – they’re not going to fool around with something that’s been such a success for them. Saint Arnold may start adding other events at which beer will be sold. I suspect there will be a lot of experimenting, and that’s just fine. The brewers and the brewpubs have been given a lot of new latitude, and it will take them awhile to figure out how best to take advantage of it for themselves.

 

Saint Arnold is the biggest player in the microbrewery space around here, but there are plenty of others now. One of them is Karbach, which hasn’t decided yet what it will do now that it can sell beer on premise. Karbach has been growing like gangbusters lately, so the new freedom they’ve been given comes at a great time for them.

 

Karbach Brewing Co., one of the nation’s fastest-growing craft breweries, has signed a distribution deal that will significantly expand its availability in stores, bars and restaurants from Beaumont to Galveston to Victoria.

 

In a separate deal, the Houston brewery also will begin selling beer in San Antonio next month, co-founder Ken Goodman said Wednesday.

 

To meet the anticipated demand, Karbach is completing a major expansion of its northwest Houston plant that will give it capacity to produce and sell up to 40,000 barrels annually, up from 15,000 barrels.

 

Karbach, which began sales in August 2011, produced more than 8,000 barrels in 2012, well ahead of internal forecasts. Goodman said he expects to sell 18,000 to 20,000 barrels this year.

 

That will include new sales in 17 counties across Southeast Texas through a distribution arrangement announced Wednesday with Del Papa Distributing Co.

 

Karbach had been delivering some beers on its own in a limited area, but the Del Papa deal will put year-round and special-release beers in a wider variety of stores and bars.

 

According to some research done by The New Yorker, based on newly released 2012 data gathered by the Brewers Association, Karbach was the second-fastest growing brewery in the country from 2011 to 2012, with sales increasing by a phenomenal 1112% over that year. You have to start at a pretty low level to grow tenfold, but still, that’s impressive. Overall, craft brewery production increased by 14% in the state, though the total volume of over 770,000 barrels is still peanuts compared to what an Anheuser Busch produces in a year. One reason why there’s been such growth is because there’s plenty of room for it. Texas is only 41st in the country in craft breweries per capita. A whole lot more of these places could open before the market even approaches saturation.

 

One more thing:

 

The brewers guild released new figures Friday showing that craft beer production in Texas was up 42 percent last year compared with 2011. It estimated the industry’s economic impact in the state was $737 million in 2012.

 

“Texas craft beer now accounts for an estimated 0.98 percent of all beer consumed in Texas, but it employs 59.7 percent of the people who work in breweries in the state,” it said.

 

The new figures don’t appear on the Texas Craft Brewers Guild website just yet, though you can still see last year’s study, which put the impact at $608 million. You can be sure that number will be even bigger next year.

 

 

——

Turkey: Turkish alcohol ad ban will encourage illicit booze

 

Source: The Spirits Business

by Becky Paskin

18th June, 2013

 

Turkey’s ban on alcohol advertising will prevent new brands from entering the market, while allowing the illicit market to flourish, a European spirits organisation has said.

 

The country adopted strict legislation on 24 May forbidding the advertising and promotion of alcohol on TV – including scenes that depict drinking, and the sale of alcohol between 10pm and 6am.

 

However Spirits Europe claims the new laws, which are designed to stem the amount of alcohol drunk in the country, will in fact encourage the counterfeit spirits market to grow.

 

“The ban will make it impossible for new comers to enter the market (be they Turkish or foreign brands),” the group said in a statement. “By making legitimate brands less accessible, the new proposal will also provide additional incentives for the illicit market to flourish.

 

“The WTO estimates that as much as 50% of the alcohol consumption in Turkey is already from informal channels. Because illicit products are beyond the reach of tax and public health officials, they represent foregone tax revenues to the government and carry an intrinsic public health risk.”

 

According to a study of Turkish consumers by TNS, 82.4% of the population aged over 18 claim not to drink alcohol.

 

“So if ever advertising would influence the level of consumption – and we believe it does not – there is little to win and even less on harm reduction, yet the decision will have a serious economic effect,” Spirits Europe added.

 

Diageo, which bought the Turkish raki producer Mey Icki two years ago for £1.3bn, saw shares fall 5.3% when Turkey’s parliament passed the alcohol ad ban. It called the legislation “disappointing”, adding that a “collaborative approach among the industry, government, and third parties would lead to a better outcome.”

 

Spirits Europe is now urging the Turkish government to open a consultation with the industry on the law’s implementation.

Find Us Online

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Like Us On Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/FranklinliquorsMA

Follow Us On Twitter

http://www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

 

 

Liquor Industry News 6-5-13

June 5, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Wednesday June 5th 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic FRUIT Day

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine And Watch The Bruins!

 

Anheuser-Busch completes $20.1B Grupo Modelo deal

 

Source: KSDK

Jun 4, 2013   

 

Anheuser-Busch InBev has completed its $20.1 billion purchase of Mexican brewer Grupo Modelo.

 

The world’s largest brewer has been trying for almost a year to buy the half of Modelo that it did not already own. The Department of Justice initially blocked the deal, concerned that it would hurt U.S. beer shoppers’ choices, but signed off on the combination after AB InBev agreed to sell Modelo’s entire U.S. business to a wine maker, Constellation Brands Inc.

 

Constellation will sell Modelo brands including Corona in the U.S., effectively replacing Modelo as a competitor to AB InBev. AB InBev expects that deal to close Friday.

 

AB InBev, based in Belgium, sells Budweiser, Stella Artois and other beers. The combined company will also sell Corona and other Modelo brands outside the U.S

 

 

——

AB InBev Judge Rejects Bid to Block Modelo Buyout

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Joel Rosenblatt & Karen Gullo

Jun 5, 2013

 

A group of consumers who claimed Anheuser-Busch InBev NV (ABI)’s $20 billion acquisition of Grupo Modelo SAB (GPMCF) will lead to higher beer prices lost their bid for a court order blocking the deal.

 

It would be “difficult and awkward at this point to set aside the transaction” completed yesterday morning, U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney said at a hearing yesterday afternoon in San Francisco. She considered a request for a temporary restraining order by Joseph Alioto, attorney for nine consumers who filed an antitrust lawsuit to block the deal on grounds that it will reduce competition.

 

Budweiser-maker AB InBev, the world’s largest beer company, agreed as part of the merger to sell Mexico City-based Modelo’s stake in their joint U.S. distribution venture to Constellation Brands Inc. (STZ) for $1.85 billion. Constellation “will be in no position to maintain lower prices in the face of ABI constant pressure to increase prices,” Alioto said in a June 3 court filing.

 

“The plaintiff would have to show that it is not a legitimate transaction, that it’s a sham,” Chesney said. “I do not find that the plaintiff has made that showing by this time.”

 

The U.S. said its agreement with Leuven, Belgium-based AB InBev to turn Victor, New York-based Constellation into a competing brewer could save beer drinkers almost $1 billion a year because of lower prices.

 

Alioto has sued to block other deals, including the one that created United Continental Holdings Inc. and the merger of Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and AirTran Holdings Inc.

 

The case is Edstrom v. Anheuser-Busch InBev NV, 13-cv-01309, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

 

 

——

Brands by Value: full results (Excerpt)

 

Source: Drinks International

04 June, 2013

 

Brand valuation and marketing company Brand Finance has compiled a ranking of the world’s biggest spirits by  brand value. Here is the top 50.

 

http://www.drinksint.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/3851/Brands_by_Value:_full_results.html

 

This year’s Brands by Value table continues to see a volume shift towards local brands from developing countries. The potential for these brands, especially from China, is immense and opportunities to develop variants to enhance margin – and, in turn, cross borders – remain. Margin growth remains with the global power brands however.

 

 

——

BFb: 4Q13 Earnings Pre-Game Primer

 

Source: CITI

Jun 4th

 

Solid Net Sales Growth Expected – In 4Q13, we expect BFB’s reported sales to increase 5.5% YoY, the result of: (i) a relatively easy comp as sales were up just 1.3% in the year-ago period, (ii) the benefit from the company’s 1Q13 price increases, and (iii) the solid volume trends seen in Nielsen-tracked channels (particularly for the Jack Daniel’s, Gentleman Jack and Woodford Reserve brands). The Street is looking for 7.5% sales growth. We expect that currency movements will act as a 1-pt drag such that underlying net sales will be up 6.5% YoY.

 

Margins Should Contract – We expect that BFB will deliver a 52.5% gross margin (-10 bps YoY), driven primarily by an unfavorable comp (as 4Q12 benefitted from favorable cost variances). We believe that BFB’s operating margin will contract to 18.3% (-40 bps), the result of higher SG&A spending related to reorganizations in Europe and Asia, and also due to increased advertising and promotional investments. We highlight that our operating margin estimate (which is 50 bps ahead of consensus) may be somewhat high given that BFB began a significant ad campaign (including TV spots) for the Gentleman Jack brand in mid-April.

 

EPS Unchanged YoY – In 4Q13, we expect that BFB will deliver pro forma EPS of $0.49, which is essentially unchanged YoY and is three cents above consensus.

 

What We’ll Be Interested in Hearing About – An update on bourbon pricing, including a read into whether BFB will act as a price leader in the category; management’s expectations for the growth of whiskies going forward, including share shifts between brown and white spirits; additional detail regarding the alcohol advertising ban in Turkey and its potential impact on Jack Daniel’s; color on the NTSB proposal to reduce the legal blood alcohol limit for drivers; and BFB’s gross margin expectations for FY14.

 

Conference Call Details – Wednesday, June 5, at 10:00 am ET. Dial-in: 888-624-9285 (domestic) and 706-679-3410 (international). No password is required.

 

 

——

Belvedere revenue falls by 5% y/y in Q1

 

Source: Warsaw Business Journal

3rd June 2013

 

Belvedere, owner of the Sobieski vodka brand, had a revenue of ?188.7 million in the first quarter of 2013, 5 percent less than in the corresponding period of 2012. In Poland, which accounts for 60 percent of Belvedere’s sales, revenue fell by as much as 9.4 percent.

 

The company explains that the situation in the Polish vodka market has worsened, but it managed to maintain its leading position, with Krupnik vodka’s market share at 14 percent. All of Belvedere’s brands have a combined market share of 17.5 percent in Poland.

 

Sales in the US were hit as well, falling by 46.5 percent compared to the same period of last year. The reason behind this could be the fact that Belvedere decided to move Sobieski vodka to the premium category and as a result increased its price.

 

There are markets where Belvedere increased its revenues. In France, sales grew by 8.4 percent, in Denmark they rose by 4.8 percent and in Latvia they grew by 11.1 percent.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Deadline looming, Pa. senator to submit a different plan on privatizing liquor stores

 

Source: Post-Gazette

By Karen Langley

June 5, 2013

 

After a final hearing on privatizing state liquor sales, the chairman of a key Senate committee said Tuesday he will unveil a plan that departs from the House proposal with less than two weeks to negotiate differences before Gov. Tom Corbett’s requested deadline.

 

Sen. Chuck McIlhinney, R-Bucks and chair of the Law & Justice Committee, said he has set aside the bill the House passed in March and will propose his own plan the week of June 17. Mr. Corbett has repeatedly said he wants a privatization bill on his desk by June 30.

 

Mr. McIlhinney said he favors maintaining the current number of retail licenses but allowing businesses to sell more types of alcohol. Where the House plan sells off the wholesale operation, Mr. McIlhinney said the state should wait to see how changing the rules of retail sales affects the worth of a wholesale license.

 

“I’m having a really tough time getting a handle on that value of the wholesale system,” he said. “Selling it right now, outright, isn’t something I think you’re going to see in the bill.”

 

Such a change spells trouble in the House, where Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, said any liquor-privatization bill must be “substantially similar” to the legislation that cleared his chamber.

 

“Wholesale divestiture is a crucial component to make sure there is a competitive market,” he said. “It’s an essential component.”

 

Mr. McIlhinney said he opposes the House bill in large part because it divests the state’s wholesale business through a one-time sale of licenses. He said he would not use the bill, which he described as “rather complicated,” as a starting point.

 

But Mr. Turzai said he expects the House bill to be considered by the Senate.

 

“I believe that the Senate as a whole will ultimately take up House Bill 790 and study it in detail,” he said. “The only bill that gets to the governor’s desk is a serious bill, one that is substantially similar to House Bill 790.”

 

The House bill would create 1,200 licenses for the sale of wine and spirits, first available to beer distributors, with the possibility of up to 600 additional licenses as state liquor stores close. Groceries could buy licenses to sell wine but not beer, except through existing restaurant licenses. State stores would be required to close by county as private retailers opened, and the Liquor Control Board would be required to close all state stores when the number fell below 100.

 

Mr. McIlhinney said he wants to allow holders of alcohol licenses to sell more types of products. Asked what a grocery could sell under this plan, he said: “You’re talking about an alcohol license. Alcohol means wine, spirits and beer.”

 

Mr. Corbett kicked off this year’s attempts at privatization in January with a proposal that, unlike the House bill, would have allowed groceries and convenience stores to sell beer and would have set a deadline for shuttering the state stores. But he hailed the passage of the House version as a momentous step.

 

Testifying before the Senate panel Tuesday, Lt. Gov. Jim Cawley said the administration believes its plan is best suited to achieve its goals. But he said Mr. Corbett has shown he is willing to talk with legislators about how to improve convenience, selection and pricing in liquor sales.

 

“Certainly the governor has indicated his willingness to enter into and continue discussions,” he said.

 

Mr. Corbett’s spokesman, Kevin Harley, declined to say whether the components Mr. McIlhinney described would be acceptable to the governor.

 

“We look forward to seeing Sen. McIlhinney’s bill and working with him and the Senate to provide consumer choice and convenience,” he said. “We’ll wait to see the details of his bill.”

 

The committee meeting featured a sharp exchange between Mr. Cawley and Sen. Jim Ferlo, D-Highland Park, who called the lieutenant governor’s remarks “totally outrageous” — drawing applause from the union members filling the hearing room — and criticized the secretary of health, Michael Wolf, the commissioner of the state police, Frank Noonan, and a deputy secretary of education, Carolyn Dumaresq, for sitting beside him.

 

Afterward, Mr. Noonan and Mr. Wolf said the proposal would bring additional money to liquor enforcement and alcohol education, while Ms. Dumaresq spoke about an education grant program that Mr. Corbett proposed, using the proceeds from his privatization plan.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Boisterous and Tense Moments at Pa. Liquor Store Privatization Hearing

 

Source: CBS Philly

By Tony Romeo

June 4, 2013

 

The chairman of the Pennsylvania state senate committee vetting liquor privatization legislation says he expects to offer his own bill in about two weeks, now that his panel has held the last of three hearings on the issue.

 

The last hearing before the Senate Law and Justice Committee turned raucous when the ranking Democrat on the panel, Jim Ferlo, attacked several members of the Corbett cabinet for supporting liquor privatization as a room packed with state store workers cheered him on.

 

“For the colonel of the state police to even suggest that a proliferation of alcohol around the state is somehow going to be enhanced under privatization I think is just almost laughable on its face,” Ferlo said.

 

But his comments got a stern rebuke from Lt. Governor Jim:

 

“What should be embarrassing to you is the way you just impugned the character of three very excellent public servants!”

 

The Pennsylvania House has already passed a liquor privatization bill.  The chairman of the Senate committee says he expects to offer his own bill that will significantly reduce the number of state-run liquor stores in Pennsylvania.

 

 

——

Oregon: OLCC Commissioners to vote on extending the 50-cent surcharge on distilled spirits and a possible 25-cent increase of the surcharge

 

Source: OLCC

Jun 4th

 

The Commissioners of the Oregon Liquor Control Commission will hold a special Commission meeting Thursday, June 6 at 7:30 a.m. via phone. At the meeting, the Commissioners will vote on whether to continue the 50-cent surcharge on distilled spirits in addition to a separate 25-cent surcharge increase on distilled spirits.

 

The Governor’s Balanced Budget for the Oregon Liquor Control Commission for the 2013-2015 biennium includes an extension of the current 50-cent surcharge on distilled spirits. OLCC Commissioners’ action is required to continue the current surcharge levels.

 

The current 50-cent per bottle (25 cents per mini) surcharge is scheduled to expire June 30, 2013.

 

The proposed 50-cent surcharge is a continuation of the surcharge that was initiated in the 2009-2011 biennium and extended through the 2011-2013 biennium. Should the Commissioners approve an extension, the surcharge could continue.

 

If the 50-cent surcharge is continued, it is expected to generate $32.4 million for the biennium. If the Commissioners approve an additional 25-cent surcharge, it could generate an additional $16.2 million for the biennium.

 

How the revenue is distributed is determined by statute and can only be changed by the legislature.

 

The Commissioners will consider public comment heard at the April Commission meeting as well as written public testimony submitted during the public comment period.

 

Written comments on both proposals were accepted until 5:00 PM, June 3, 2013. No public comment or testimonials will be accepted at the June 6 telephone meeting.

 

 

——

Whiskey Makers Court Jewish Market

 

Source: The New York Times

By ROBERT SIMONSON

June 4, 2013

 

For avid whiskey lovers, few events are more eagerly anticipated than WhiskyFest, an enormous tasting that touches down in several American cities throughout the year. But when sponsors of the New York festival suddenly moved it last year from Tuesday to Friday and Saturday, many regulars were unable to attend.

 

An alternative arrived suddenly in the form of a new one-night event, held on the eve of WhiskyFest. Despite little time to advertise, it drew a crowd of 250 to its unlikely Manhattan location: the West Side Institutional Synagogue.

 

These whiskey devotees, it turned out, were Jews shut out of the big event because they observe the Sabbath. And to drive home the point of the tasting, its founder, the fledgling Jewish Whisky Company, called it Whisky Jewbilee.

 

Whiskey has numerous fan bases, but few are more devoted – and arguably less noticed by the press and public – than Jews, particularly observant Jews. Synagogues are increasingly organizing events around whiskey, and whiskey makers are reaching out to the Jewish market.

 

Retailers have long recognized Jews as valuable customers. “Jewish men are very interested in the selection of whiskey available at a wedding or bar/bat mitzvah,” said Jonathan Goldstein, vice president of Park Avenue Liquor Shop, a Manhattan store known for its whiskey selection. “They very often will pick up a special bottle to offer close friends or relatives.” Of the Friday before the Jewish holiday of Purim, last February, he said, “It was like Christmas in here.”

 

Part of the spirit’s appeal to many Orthodox Jews is that most whiskey is naturally kosher. In contrast, wine, owing to its long connection to Jewish tradition, must satisfy many regulations to earn a hechsher, the symbol of kosher certification.

 

But that hasn’t stopped prominent Scotch producers like Glenrothes, Glenmorangie, Ardbeg, Bowmore and Auchentoshan from courting the Jewish consumer by obtaining official kosher certification for certain bottlings.

 

Bourbon producers have even less to worry about, because by federal law their spirits must be aged in new casks, rather than in the sherry, port or wine barrels that some whiskey distillers use, and that give some kosher drinkers pause because of their exposure to wine. Yet the Buffalo Trace Distillery in Kentucky recently enlisted the help of the Chicago Rabbinical Council in laying down more than 1,000 barrels of three styles of whiskey, all certified kosher and set for release in five or six years.

 

In a smaller-scale but similar enterprise, the Royal Wine Corporation, a New York producer of kosher wine and grape juice, asked Wesley Henderson two years ago if he would be interested in making a kosher-certified version of his boutique bourbon, Angel’s Envy. “We were looking for a bourbon line in general,” said Shlomo S. Blashka, a wine and spirits educator at Royal, also the New York-area distributor of Angel’s Envy. “The Jewish community is a very big bourbon community.”

 

Mr. Henderson did not have to be told. “You’d have to be blind not to notice it,” he said. “I thought, if you had a kosher bourbon, that would be a great thing. It seemed a no-brainer.”

 

For the new whiskey, Angel’s Envy was aged for six months in barrels that had held Kedem kosher port for 20 years. The run sold quickly, Mr. Henderson said, and may become a permanent addition to the bourbon maker’s line.

 

In 2011, Jason Johnstone-Yellin and two partners founded the Jewish Whisky Company, which has bottled barrels from six Scotch distillers. “We had the opportunity to purchase casks, where not everybody would have that opportunity,” said Mr. Johnstone-Yellin, who was born in Scotland and whose American wife is Jewish.

 

During a recent trip to the Victoria Whisky Festival in British Columbia, he said, he buttonholed a representative of a well-known international whiskey distillery and asked if it would let the Jewish Whisky Company bottle one of its casks.

 

“The response was: ‘We’re very protective of our brand. We don’t do that,’ ” said Joshua Hatton, another partner in the business, who also founded a popular blog, Jewish Single Malt Whisky Society – now renamed Jewmalt.

 

Mr. Johnstone-Yellin, not giving up, gave the man his card and pointed to the word “Jewish.” “This is our market,” he said. “These are our customers and members.”

 

The man paused, he said, then agreed to talk to them.

 

The bond with whiskey goes way back. Mr. Blashka said early Jewish immigrants to America, unable to trust the provenance of local wines, turned to certain distilled liquors, including whiskey. “Because the wine was an issue, typically spirits was their avenue for drinking,” he said.

 

As recent decades have ushered in a revival in Scotch, bourbon and other whiskeys, Jews, like many other groups, have moved beyond the usual blends and have developed more sophisticated tastes. “Now we have many whiskeys that we know are kosher,” said Rabbi Aaron Raskin of Congregation B’nai Avraham in Brooklyn Heights, whose preferred whiskey is the smoky Laphroaig, a single malt from Islay. “It is used to add to our joy.”

 

“And it helps attendance at synagogues,” he added.

 

Whiskey-centered events at temples are a lot more common than they used to be, said Joshua London, a lobbyist for the Zionist Organization of America who regularly writes about whiskey for Jewish publications. For the last three years, Mr. London has been asked by his Orthodox synagogue in Potomac, Md., to pull together bottles for an annual pre-Passover whiskey and barbecue night.

 

This year, 350 people attended the sold-out event. One rabbi, Charles Arian, began developing an interest in bourbon 10 years ago, after he married a woman from Kentucky. When he moved from Connecticut to a new post at Kehilat Shalom in Gaithersburg, Md., he began organizing bourbon tastings. “There are two things I am passionate about besides Judaism,” he said. “Bourbon and Georgetown basketball.”

 

For him, a big attraction of whiskey is its handmade origin. “It can only get so technical because of the barrel,” he said. “A barrel is made by a human being, just like a Torah scroll can only be made by a human being. We’re not importing Torah scrolls from China.”

 

The extent of a congregation’s, or congregant’s, embrace of whiskey can vary. “It all depends on what rabbi you hold by,” Rabbi Arian said. Some are content with whiskeys that are kosher by nature; others like the extra insurance of a hechsher. Aging or finishing in wine barrels will disqualify a bottle for one drinker, while another isn’t troubled by the distinction.

 

For years, there was no greater yardstick of Jewish interest in whiskey than New York’s WhiskyFest, sponsored by Whisky Advocate magazine.

 

“If you went years ago, you’d see that close to 50 percent of the people attending were wearing kippot,” Mr. Blashka said, referring to skullcaps. When WhiskyFest became a two-day event in 2012, held during the Sabbath, many Jews who wanted to attend were not pleased. “I wish I could tell you the sheer number of e-mails I received from my readers, distributors, importers, distillers,” Mr. Hatton said.

 

He said an importer and a distributor entreated him to assemble a pop-up festival for the disenfranchised customers and many producers in town for WhiskyFest.

 

Whisky Jewbilee will return this fall, at a larger site, and a second date in Westchester County will be added. “There were a couple distillers that we didn’t reach out to” last fall, Mr. Johnstone-Yellin said. “They said, ‘You will have us be part, won’t you?’ They’re smart people. They know who’s not going to be standing at their table on Friday and Saturday night.”

 

 

——

Return of the Cocktail Culture (Excerpt)

 

A New Film Celebrates Barkeeps and the Cocktails They Serve

 

Source: WSJ

By STEVE DOLLAR

Jun 4th

 

Bow-tied bartenders serving classic Manhattans in coupe glasses for an eclectic clientele may be a familiar scene in New York now-as it was more than a century ago-but it took a long time for the cocktail to come back to its full glory. In his new documentary “Hey Bartender,” which has its premiere Friday at Village East Cinema in the East Village, Douglas Tirola explores that revival, using expert witnesses like the pioneering mixologist Dale DeGroff (aka “King Cocktail”) and an insider’s look at such local cocktail-culture staples as PDT, Milk and Honey, the Flatiron Lounge and Employees Only. Messrs. DeGroff and Tirola annotated a timeline devoted to the cocktail’s rise, fall and return.

 

 

——

China Ups Ante in Trade Spat With EU

 

Source: WSJ

Jun 5th

 

China increased the stakes in its efforts to roll back the threat of European Union tariffs on its solar equipment exports Wednesday by announcing an investigation into what it called unfair EU wine-trade subsidies.

 

In a two-pronged response to what is becoming one of the biggest China-EU trade disputes, Beijing’s commerce ministry said it hoped to find solutions to the solar dispute acceptable to both sides as soon as possible, and reiterated its strong opposition to the tariffs.

 

The moves came hours after EU officials said they would delay for two months the full impact of import tariffs they plan to put on Chinese solar power equipment to allow Chinese manufacturers to negotiate a settlement.

 

“Trade relations are an important foundation for the China-Europe relationship,” commerce ministry spokesman Shen Danyang said. “China is unwilling to see the trade friction in the solar sector have an impact on the overall China-Europe relation.”

 

His remarks were diluted by the simultaneous announcement that the ministry has opened anti-dumping and antisubsidy investigations into wine from the EU.

 

“Wine imports from the EU enter our market via dumping, subsidies and other unfair trade practices, and have hit our wine production,” the ministry said.

 

The EU’s decision Tuesday came after a campaign of intense lobbying by the Chinese government that appeared to help swing the tide of opinion among some of the 27 EU national governments against the tariffs.

 

China is the EU’s second-largest trading partner, though that relationship has been marred by spats over trade in telecommunications, chemicals and seamless pipes.

 

The solar tariffs will come into force Thursday at 11.8%, a quarter of the average level seen in a European Commission plan circulated last month. The tariffs were supposed to average around 47%. They will cover solar panels and their main components-solar cells and silicon wafers-which the commission says Chinese companies are dumping at below fair-market prices.

 

Mr. De Gucht is giving Chinese solar-panel manufacturers until Aug. 6 to propose an acceptable alternative to the tariff plan. All manufacturers will face the same 11.8% tariff for the two-month period. If an agreement isn’t reached by then, the tariffs will come into force at the originally planned level.

 

Solar panels and related equipment make up a large chunk of China’s exports, accounting at their peak in 2011 for 7% of all Chinese sales to the EU.

 

Chinese solar-panel producers are already facing tough economic conditions, as a cyclical downturn has hammered demand and pushed Chinese giants like Suntech Power Holdings into bankruptcy proceedings STP -1.96% . The U.S. government last year slapped antidumping tariffs on Chinese-made solar cells, the devices in panels that convert sunlight into electricity.

 

Likewise, China’s wine market has exploded in recent years, with Europe-France in particular-its main trading partner.

 

China imported 430 million liters of wine last year valued at $2.6 billion, up 8.9% from a year earlier; more than two-thirds of that came from the EU, according to local wine consultancy Ease Scent Wine & Culture Co. Ltd., citing government customs data.

Wine imports from France alone were 170 million liters last year, up 11% on-year and accounting for 40% of China’s total wine imports.

 

Chinese investors have also sought out investments in Europe’s wine industry. Among other examples, Cofco Group, China’s largest state-owned food trading firm, purchased Château de Viaud, a winery in the Bordeaux region in 2011.

 

Wine consumption per capita in China is still a fraction of that in other countries. Chinese drinkers consumed only 1.4 liters of wine per person in 2011, far below the French average of 53.2 liters per person, according to research company International Wine & Spirit Research. It predicts China’s per capita consumption will increase to 2.1 liters per person over the next three years.

 

Share of Chinese winemakers soared in response to Wednesday’s developments. Yantai Changyu Pioneer Wine Co. 000869.SZ +10.00% Ltd., China’s largest listed grape winemaker in terms of market capitalization, was 10% higher at 44.44 yuan Wednesday afternoon.

Gansu Mogao Industrial Development Co. 600543.SH +9.33% shares rose 7.3%, while Tonghua Grape Wine Co. 600365.SH +7.52% Ltd. was 5% higher and Citic Guoan Wine Co. Ltd. increased 7.5%.

 

 

——

George Grant joins Glenfarclas board

 

Source: the drinks business

by Gabriel Savage

4th June, 2013

 

Glenfarclas Distillery owners J&G Grant has announced the appointment of George Grant to its board of directors.

 

The sixth generation of his family to work for Glenfarclas, George joined the company in 1997. Having spent two years working with Fine Vintage to promote the single malt Scotch whisky in Hong Kong, he returned to Speyside in 1999.

 

Since then, George has taken on responsibility for promoting Glenfarclas across North America, Germany and the UK. As sales director, he now oversees the company’s presence in more than 70 markets, overseeing sales growth of over 75% during the last four years.

 

Welcoming his son to the board, chairman John Grant said: “He has done an excellent job in challenging times over the last few years, and we are confident that as sales director he will continue to grow our brand around the world”.

 

Among the recent activities from Glenfarclas was last month’s £14,000 joint release with Hine Cognac of 1953 vintage expressions.

 

 

——

GLAZER’S, INC. APPOINTS DAVID AIKENS VICE PRESIDENT MULTICULTURAL SALES AND MARKETING

 

Source: Glazer’s

June 4, 2013

 

Glazer’s, Inc. today announces the promotion of David Aikens to Vice President, Multicultural Sales and Marketing, effective June 1, 2013. In this position, Aikens will be responsible for marketing efforts across Glazer’s business channels to positively impact sales execution and engagement across multicultural markets, including African-American, Hispanic/Latino-American, Asian-American and GBLT populations.

 

Aikens joined Glazer’s in 2011 and most recently was Director of Multicultural Sales and Marketing, DMH. Aikens led the promotional marketing team that earned Glazer’s Diageo’s “Golden Bar Award” for Multicultural Marketing in 2012. Prior to joining Glazer’s, Aikens held various positions in advertising, distribution, promotions, marketing and new business development working with a diverse portfolio of clients in the beverage alcohol and consumer products industries. His knowledge across multiple marketing avenues, as well as his multicultural market expertise, positions Glazer’s well to continue its lead in this area. Aikens earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Marketing from Rochester Institute of Technology.

 

 

——

Sarah Pearson Appointed Director Of Marketing For The Hess Collection Winery

 

Source: Hess Collection

Jun 4th

 

Sarah Pearson has been appointed Director of Marketing for The Hess Collection winery, reporting to Chief Marketing Officer Derek Bromley.

 

Pearson will primarily focus on The Hess Collection Winery and Hess Family Wine Estates wineries Artezin, MacPhail and Sequana, and will also contribute to domestic marketing efforts for Hess Family wineries Glen Carlou, Peter Lehmann, Colomé and Amalaya.

 

 

——

Frank Soares

 

Source: Premier Beverage

Jun 4th

 

With a heavy heart, we announce that a beloved member of the Premier Beverage family, Frank Soares, passed away on the morning of Saturday, May 25th as the result of a heart attack. Frank joined the Premier team in 2003 as the Senior Manager of Operations for the Jacksonville facility and in 2009 became the Senior Manager of Operations and Distribution for the Miramar house. He was with the Premier Beverage team for 10 years and made a lasting impact on everyone he knew. He had an incredible can-do attitude and a constant quest for continuous improvement. Frank was also a loving husband to his wife of 26 years, Dianna, and a devoted father to their three children Michelle, Nick, and Emily.

 

 

——

Tesco recovery in doubt as sales fall

 

Source: FT

By Andrea Felsted, Senior Retail Correspondent

Jun 5h

 

Tesco said sales from UK stores open at least a year fell by 1 per cent in the past three months.

 

This is a reversal from the 0.5 per cent increase in UK like-for-like sales, excluding petrol and VAT, in the three months to the end of February.

 

The performance raises questions about the momentum behind Tesco’s recovery, after Philip Clarke, chief executive, last year said he would invest £1bn to turn round the UK business after Tesco’s first profit warning in 20 years in January 2012.

 

The first quarter performance also compares with a period a year ago when UK like-for-like sales fell by a similar amount.

 

Mr Clarke said the performance was held back by a revamp of its non-food business in the UK, where it was ditching some lines and going more upmarket in others in an effort to win customers from rivals such as John Lewis.

 

However, he said the group had seen positive like-for-like sales in all food categories, with the exception of chilled convenience and frozen food after the horsemeat scandal.

 

Outside the UK, like-for-like sales in Asia fell by 3.8 per cent, where Tesco has been hit by restrictions on opening hours in South Korea. Like-for-like sales in central Europe fell by 5.5 per cent.

 

“Conditions outside the UK remain challenging and we have broadly maintained our performance from the fourth quarter of last year,” said Mr Clarke.

 

 

——

Ahold: shopping for growth

 

Dutch grocer must spend wisely after disappointing investors with small buyback

 

Source: FT

Jun 4th

 

Even the most adept people-pleasers struggle to meet everyone’s needs equally. Ahold must know how that feels. On Tuesday, alongside first-quarter results, the cash-rich Dutch grocer said that it would return ?2bn to shareholders through a buyback programme over the next two years. Shareholders showed their disappointment that the buyback was not bigger by marking down the shares by 3 per cent. But Ahold made the right compromise.

 

It was the sale of Ahold’s 60 per cent stake in Scandinavian retailer ICA for ?2.5bn that has given it the firepower to increase the share buyback from ?500m. But even after the programme there will be ample room for Ahold to invest in growth. The retailer has net cash of ?1.2bn. Deutsche Bank estimates that, following the ?2bn buyback, Ahold will still have a comfortable net debt position of 1.5 times adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation, well within its 2 times target threshold.

 

After all, Ahold needs to shop for growth. Its exposure to the US and European markets means that same-store sales growth has been slipping. It fell 20 basis points in the first quarter from a year earlier to 1.8 per cent. In 2011 those sales were growing at almost 3 per cent. And top-line growth is becoming more important as margins falter. Operating margins were down from 4.3 per cent a year ago to 4.1 per cent in the first quarter. Much of that came from a one-off pension settlement in the US, but Ahold admitted that the shift to online and pricing pressure played a role.

More video

 

Ahold now trades on 13 times forecast earnings, on a par with the average of its European peers. It is also ahead of its closest rival, Belgium’s Delhaize, on 12 times, but then Ahold has better management and a stronger market position. It will need to spend wisely if it wants to please investors further.

 

 

——

Consumables buoy Dollar General’s record Q1 results

 

Source: RT

June 4, 2013

 

Dollar General reported record sales, operating profit and net income for the first quarter ended May 3, thanks to strong growth in its consumables categories.

 

The company reported net sales of $4.23 billion for the quarter, an increase of 8.5% from $3.9 billion in the prior year’s quarter. Same-store sales increased 2.6%, resulting from increases in both customer traffic and average transaction amount. Total sales increases in consumables significantly outpaced increases in the company’s non-consumable categories, reflecting the impact of continued financial pressures on consumers as well as unfavorable weather conditions in many of the company’s geographic regions.

 

The company’s gross profit, as a percentage of sales, was 31% in the 2013 first quarter, a decrease of 89 basis points from the 2012 first quarter. The gross profit rate was negatively affected by higher markdowns; a higher mix of consumables, which generally have lower gross profit rates; increased inventory shrinkage; and lower initial markups. These factors were partially offset by improved transportation efficiencies and other logistics initiatives, in addition to modestly lower fuel rates.

 

While the company’s gross profit was lower than it anticipated, its operational profit saw record growth. Dollar General’s operating profit for the quarter was $395 million, or 9.3% of sales, a 3% increase from $384 million, or 9.9% of sales, in the prior year’s quarter.

 

“For the quarter, we achieved same-store sales growth of 2.6% reflecting strong growth in our consumables categories offset by softer sales in seasonal and weather-sensitive categories,” said chairman and CEO Rick Dreiling. “We believe the continued strength in consumables is a sign of the underlying health of our business.”

 

The company’s net income was $220 million for the quarter, a 3.5% increase from $213 million in the prior year’s quarter. Adjusted net income – which excludes expenses relating to secondary offerings of the company’s stock in both the 2013 and 2012 periods, losses associated with restructuring the company’s credit facility in 2013, an amendment of the company’s revolving credit facility in 2012 and income tax effect of adjustments – was $232 million for the quarter, an 8% increase from $215 million in the prior year’s quarter.

 

“We have updated our outlook for the year to reflect moderating sales growth and a lower expected gross profit rate than we previously anticipated,” Dreiling added. “We are well positioned for our same-store sales growth to accelerate to 4 to 5% for the year as our key initiatives, such as the roll out of tobacco and Phase 5 planogram changes, continue to gain traction through the year. Sales of non-consumables are expected to remain challenging, and we anticipate a continued shift to lower margin items within consumables and higher inventory shrink. We believe that our customers’ dependence on our everyday low pricing and convenient locations has never been greater.”

 

 

——

Restaurant sales continue to rise in May

 

Black Box Intelligence analyzes the results of the latest Restaurant Industry Snapshot

 

Source: NRN

Jun. 4, 2013

 

Black Box Intelligence and People Report released The Restaurant Industry Snapshot for May this week, reporting a third straight month of positive sales.

 

Same-store sales rose 0.8 percent in May, showing an improvement over April’s 0.4-percent increase. Same-store traffic results declined 1.6 percent, a slight improvement over April.

 

Consumer Edge Research, a partner company to People Report and Black Box Intelligence, released the Restaurant Willingness to Spend Index last week with a value of 88 for May, an increase over the index score of 86 reported for April. Based on historical data gathered through the partnership, an increase in the index score suggests a higher Black Box Intelligence same-stores sales rate in the month of June.

 

“Sales are still weaker than we would like to see, but three straight positive sales months is a result not seen since last June through August, 2012,” said Bill Schaffler, president at Black Box Intelligence and People Report. “Additionally, we are encouraged the consumer continues to indicate they may be turning a bit of a corner, as they indicated an increased desire to spend their money two months running, a result we have not observed since 2011. This is encouraging news as we enter the summer months.”

 

In addition, 104 out of 176 DMAs posted a positive result in May. The New England region performed the best with a 3.5-percent same-store sales increase. The Southwest was the lowest-performing area, with a same-store sales decrease of 1.0 percent.

 

People Report also presents turnover results by position by segment to their member companies each month. In April, results show management and hourly turnover increasing.

 

The most recent job growth reported by People Report is an increase of 1.0 percent, higher than last month’s increase of 0.4 percent. The job growth, although positive, remains slower than reported in most of 2012.

 

The Restaurant Industry Snapshot is a compilation of real sales and traffic results from 170+ DMAs from 100+ restaurant brands and approximately 15,000+ restaurants that are clients of Black Box Intelligence. Currently, data is reported in four distinct segments: casual dining, upscale/fine-dining, fast casual, and family dining. Black Box Intelligence is a sister company to People Report, which tracks one million restaurant employees on workforce analytics. The Restaurant Industry Snapshot also includes the Restaurant Industry Willingness to Spend Index from Consumer Edge Research, which is a monthly household survey of more than 2,500 consumers. Consumer Edge Insights is a marketing partner with Black Box Intelligence and People Report

 

 

——

Landry’s buys Mastro’s Restaurants

 

Plans to expand the steak and seafood concept are already in the works

 

Source: NRN

Ron Ruggless  

Jun. 4, 2013

 

Landry’s Inc. of Houston has confirmed its purchase of Mastro’s Restaurants LLC of Woodland Hills, Calif., and already has plans to expand the 11-unit, upscale brand by three more units during the next 15 months.

 

Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but a Landry’s spokesman said Mastro’s chairman and chief executive Mark Levy would stay with the Landry’s division. “Levy and his management team will remain in place to run day-to-day operations of the concept,” a company spokesperson said.

 

“Mastro’s is the best steak and seafood restaurant concept in America,” Tilman Fertitta, owner, chairman and chief executive of Landry’s Inc., told Nation’s Restaurant News Monday. Landry’s owns and operates a wide variety of restaurant, hospitality and gaming brands, ranging from Landry’s Seafood and Rainforest Café to the Golden Nugget Casinos and Hotels.

 

“[Mastro’s] is the leader in all markets in which it operates,” Fertitta said. “Business will continue as usual without any changes visible to the customer, and I look forward to helping the management team continue to grow the brand with three new planned unit openings over the next 15 months.”

 

Fertitta said that on May 24, Landry’s acquired all of the Mastro’s Restaurants equity interests, which included those of the founding Mastro family. A majority interest in the company was held by Kinderhook Industries LLC and Soros Strategic Partners LP, two New York-based private-equity firms that had grown the company since buying it in 2007. At the time of the 2007 purchase, Mastro’s Restaurants included five Mastro’s Steakhouses and two Mastro’s Ocean Clubs.

 

The original Mastro’s Steakhouse remains in Scottsdale, Ariz., and the company has added Mastro’s City Hall Steakhouse in Scottsdale, as well as steakhouse locations in Chicago and the California communities of Beverly Hills, Costa Mesa, Thousand Oaks and, in the fall of 2012, Palm Desert. Also in fall 2012, the Beverly Hills location opened The Penthouse, an upscale lounge.

 

The Mastro’s division also has upscale seafood Mastro’s Ocean Club units in Las Vegas; Newport Beach, Calif.; and Scottsdale.

 

An industry insider familiar with Mastro’s units speculated that Mastro’s produced earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of about $22 million, and indicated a selling price would be around 10 times EBITDA. The Mastro’s units were likened to Morton’s Steakhouse, which Landry’s acquired for $116.6 million in a deal closed in February 2012.

 

Average Mastro’s Steakhouse checks are estimated around $135, ranking it among the nation’s more expensive steakhouses.

 

Privately-owned Landry’s also owns McCormick & Schmick’s Saltgrass Steak House, Landry’s Seafood House, Claim Jumper, Bubba Gump Shrimp Co. and The Chart House, as well fine-dining restaurants Vic & Anthony’s, Brenner’s Steakhouse, Grotto, LaGriglia, Willie G’s and Oceanaire.

 

Landry’s also owns the Golden Nugget Hotel & Casinos in Atlantic City, N.J., Las Vegas and Laughlin, Nev.; the Isle Casino Hotel in Biloxi, Miss.; the Kemah (Texas) Boardwalk; the Galveston Island (Texas) Historic Pleasure Pier; the San Luis Resort, Inn at the Ballpark; and the Downtown Aquarium in Denver and Houston.

 

Landry’s said in 2012 that its companies were expected to generate about $2.5 billion in revenue.

 

 

——

Conference recap: Strong restaurant fundamentals in the spotlight

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

Jun 4th

 

Four common themes emerged at the conference

We hosted our 2013 Lodging, Gaming, Restaurant and Leisure conference over the past two days. Participating restaurant stocks included: BWLD, CAKE, DNKN, DPZ, EAT, SYY, THI, and YUM. We thought the tone was solidly positive and identified four key themes that emerged:

 

(1) Continued unit growth opportunities abound

Every single restaurant company that presented is planning to build more units – and we found these plans to be credible. For BWLD, DNKN and THI the primary growth is to take place in North America. YUM and DPZ, on the other hand, are primarily expanding overseas – largely in emerging markets. CAKE and EAT represent somewhat of a hybrid, with unit growth both here and abroad. We are most optimistic with respect to DPZ and YUM, as we believe there is more of a natural tailwind in emerging markets where chain restaurant penetration is still in the single digits.

 

(2) Trends may be choppy, but share gainers posting solid results

While industry trends are somewhat choppy, and some companies talked to increased promotional/competitive intensity (i.e. EAT, THI), most of the companies that presented were posting solid SSS results. This includes BWLD, DNKN, DPZ and CAKE – all of whom are gaining market share.

 

(3) Margins may be poised to rise further

There were a few companies that talked to margin pressures from a tough competitive environment. But for the most part, restaurant companies expect to enjoy margin expansion as a result of SSS leverage, cost cutting and benign food inflation. We concur as we are modeling for operating margin expansion for all presenting companies with the exception of YUM (China issues) and BWLD (wing inflation) – but we expect margin expansion for these two exceptions as the discreet issues fade in 2014.

 

(4) FCF deployment and capital structures remains in focus

All of the companies that presented, other than BWLD (which is reinvesting for growth), talked to their capital allocation strategies. Further, some companies (DNKN, THI) indicated a likelihood to take on more debt to enhance returns to shareholders. While not as explicit, comments from SYY and DPZ also suggest the potential for increased debt leverage.

 

 

——

Commentary: EAT Management at the Goldman Sachs Lodging, Gaming and Leisure conference

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

By Michael Kelter and Ivan Holman

4 Jun 2013

 

-Casual dining industry: EAT management noted that it has shifted its focus from unit growth towards driving sustainable EPS growth. The casual dining industry is exhibiting signs of maturity; however, there remain markets where Chili’s has significant opportunities to gain share, particularly from independents. Notably, the competitive environment remains challenging, with a step-up in promotional activity from some key competitors.

 

-Pizza launch: The company was upbeat on its current Pizza and flat bread platform, suggesting it is on pace to reach 8-10% of sales as per its expectation. The product is preferred by consumers once they get a trial, and it carries a higher margin contribution profile.

 

-Kitchen investments: The company continues to make significant investments in the back of house and kitchen. Management indicated that it expects these investments, and the ability to further expand menu innovation, to drive improvements in traffic and margin profile. Units equipped with the new kitchen platform can now roll out baked items via new oven capabilities. EAT is also testing a new fryer that may save money in the future.

 

-Pace of remodels: company-owned remodels are currently 40% completed. Management expects to be able to complete 60+ units per quarter, and by 2014/2015 will have fully rolled out re-images to all of its markets. The company expects franchisees to remodel units in the future as well, but the franchisees are still digesting the expenses associated with the new kitchen equipment at the moment.

 

-Cost cutting: The company expects to achieve a targeted 400bps of cost cutting benefits by the end of next year. There remain opportunities to further build on these gains as the company focuses on waste reduction initiatives and as restaurant employees get more comfortable with the new kitchen equipment.

 

 

——

Commentary: CAKE Management at the Goldman Sachs Lodging, Gaming and Leisure conference

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

By Michael Kelter and Ivan Holman

Jun 4th

 

-Key drivers of profitability: Management highlighted five key levers available to drive long-term earnings growth: 1) SSS momentum, 2) domestic unit growth, 3) international unit growth, 4) operating margin improvement, and 5) capital deployment to shareholders.

 

-High-end exposure: Management indicated that SSS trends have benefited from the company’s exposure to higher-income consumers. This subset of consumers has not seen as pronounced an impact with regard to higher payroll taxes and fluctuations in gas prices. Furthermore, the company has been able to drive top-line growth without relying on significant discounting activity, in stark contrast to many Casual dining peers.

 

-Real estate discipline: The company believes it can achieve 300 Cheesecake Factory units domestically over the long run. Site selection follows a rigorous review process, with new units yielding 10% higher sales per square vs. legacy.

 

-Menu differentiation: CAKE highlighted menu differentiation as a significant driver of sales growth. The company believes this will remain a key driver of comp looking forward.

 

-International strategy: CAKE’s international runway remains intact, with the company seeing significant positive contribution to the P&L from international royalty streams. Management believes that international growth will be a key contributor to operating margin expansion back towards historical high-water levels. CAKE recently signed a license agreement for development in South and Central America, and sees further potential for growth in the Middle East. Management indicated that it is actively pursuing incremental licensing agreements over the coming years.

 

-License vs. Franchise: Management indicate that it is pursuing a licensing strategy vs. a franchise model in international markets. This structure allows tighter control over site selection, as well as processes and best practices in international locations.

 

-Capital allocation: Management indicated it remains committed to deploying excess cash flow to shareholders through both share repurchase activity and future dividend increases. The cadence of share repurchases is structured to offset options creep, as well as provide EPS accretive returns of shareholder capital.

 

 

——

North Carolina: Beer bills hop through committee

 

Source: WRAL

By Laura Leslie

Jun 4th

 

Two House bills that would facilitate beer sales are headed to the Senate floor after a very brief appearance in the Senate Commerce Committee.

 

House Bill 829, the “Growler Bill,” would allow restaurants, retailers and wine shops to sell resealable 64-ounce glass jugs of beer. Growler sales and refills are currently allowed only at the brewery.

 

Sponsor Rep. Chuck McGrady, R-Henderson, was barely two sentences into his presentation when Sen. Clark Jenkins, D-Edgecombe, motioned for a favorable report. The bill passed unanimously with no debate.

 

House Bill 610, In-Stand Beer Sales, also chugged through in record time. It would allow vendors to sell beer in the stands at professional sporting events at venues with a seating capacity of 3,000 or more. Vendors would not be allowed “to verbally shout or hawk the sale of malt beverages.”

 

Current law allows in-stand beer sales only at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte. Patrons at other venues must stand in line at the concession counter to buy beer.

 

Sponsor Rep. Jon Hardister, R-Guilford, called it a “customer service bill.”  

 

Rev. Mark Creech, executive director of the Christian Action League of North Carolina, warned the committee that in-stand sales would lead to more consumption. He cited a 2008 study by the National Institutes of Health that found that in-stand alcohol vendors were more likely than concession workers to sell to intoxicated or underage customers.

 

But Tim Kent, executive director of the North Carolina Beer and Wine Wholesalers Association, said professional sports team owners want the right to provide in-stand sales. He said patrons will be able to spend more time in their seats with their family and friends, instead of standing in long lines at the beer counter.

 

The second measure also passed unanimously with no debate, except a quip from Sen. Jim Davis, R-Macon.

 

“Are all these alcohol bills directly related to being in the House?” he asked Hardister.

 

 

——

United Kingdom: They’re opening a Wetherspoon’s on the motorway? Booze Britain’s addiction is totally out of control

 

I am not against anyone enjoying a drink. But it’s really started to feel like the drinks industry has a grip on almost every aspect of our culture

 

Source: The Independent

Jun 4th

 

The announcement that the Women’s Prize for Fiction is to be sponsored by Baileys has drawn accusations of sexism. Why pair such a saccharine, sickly drink that is so overtly targeted at women with a contest that celebrates the blistering, strident writing of novelists like Zadie Smith and Lionel Shriver?

 

Some suggest instead using Johnnie Walker, which, like Baileys, is also owned by drinks company Diageo. But wouldn’t it be better that alcohol was nowhere near a prize the aims of which surely include encouraging girls and young women into novel-writing?

 

I don’t want to sound like a killjoy. In fact, my twenties and early thirties were effectively sponsored by Sauvignon Blanc (only becoming a parent has driven me away from drink for fear of dealing with both a hangover and a young child at the same time). I am not against anyone enjoying a drink. But it does sometimes feel like the drinks industry has a grip on every aspect of our culture.

 

In what must be the most bizarre of decisions by a council’s licensing committee, the pub chain JD Wetherspoon has been given the go-ahead for a bar at a motorway service station. If you’re driving down the M40 between 8am and 1am, you can peel off at Junction 2 at Beaconsfield for a pint of lager or a glass of white wine. What could possibly go wrong?

 

Of course, there is nothing to stop someone on the M40 leaving at the same junction and finding a country pub a few miles away, but they would have to make the special effort. Now they can just have a swift half in between popping to the loo and filling up the tank. The bar will be open by Christmas – just as the nation’s drink-drive levels soar. The health minister, Dr Dan Poulter, described the move as “extraordinary”. As a former hospital doctor, he should know.

 

Last year, there were more than 1.1 million alcohol-related admissions to hospital – more than double the number 10 years ago. Drink costs the NHS £2.7bn every year, including a £1bn burden on accident and emergency services. Alcohol Concern predicts that this will rise to £3.7bn by 2015. There are many causes of the current crisis in A&E (waiting times are at a nine-year high, it was revealed yesterday), but alcohol is a factor that is growing in significance every year. Nationally, “alcohol admission episodes” for 2010/11 were 1,895 per 100,000 in the population, compared with 1,389 in 2006/07.

 

During my last visit to an A&E department in south London, I sat in the waiting room for an hour watching other patients arrive. One woman was so drunk she rolled off her chair, vomiting on the floor. A man was carted in by paramedics who described him as “completely pissed”. Another woman, only marginally less drunk, had broken her arm. It was 11 o’clock in the morning.

 

In my home city of Liverpool, I have walked down streets where, before midday, it is commonplace to see people already staggering from drink. This may sound hysterical, but is backed up by the depressing statistic that Liverpool has the second-highest level of alcohol-related hospital admissions for men (after Salford) in England and the third-highest for women. It is not just traditionally working-class areas that have a problem. A University of Sunderland study found that 60 per cent of women in high-income postcodes – including Knightsbridge in central London and Esher in Surrey – drink more than three units of alcohol a day.

 

All the evidence is there that we as a nation have a drinking problem, and we cannot handle it. Visiting tourists, including those from the US, gaze open-mouthed at our heavy drinking culture. And yet the Government, for fear of being branded Nanny Statists, has failed to take action. A year ago, David Cameron promised to introduce a minimum price for alcohol, which he said would lead to 900 fewer deaths a year by 2020. It was backed up by a Home Office report saying that minimum pricing would reduce consumption, and, in turn, alcohol-related illness and death. The Prime Minister lamented that beer had become cheaper than water. His words turned out to be cheaper still – earlier this year he dropped the plan. Mr Cameron, it was said, did not want to deny hard-up people a can of lager at the end of the day.

 

This is a mystery because a year ago, when he pledged the minimum price, our economy was hardly booming. But perhaps the mystery is solved when we consider how hard the drinks industry works. The decision to relax licensing hours under Tony Blair’s government in 2004 was the result of some concerted behind-the-scenes lobbying. Is it just a coincidence that, since that year, hospital admissions have risen so dramatically? The Home Office is currently looking at relaxing laws outlawing pubs on publicly owned land at motorway service stations (the Beaconsfield one is on private land).

 

And the latest spotlight on the lobbying industry reveals that the All-Party Parliamentary Beer Group is sponsored by a roll-call of drinks companies, including Molson Coors, Greene King, Carlsberg, Enterprise Inns, M&B plc, Punch Taverns, and Heineken. The group also received £8,227 from Diageo, owners of Baileys. They do get about, don’t they? It’s enough to turn you to drink.

 

 

——

Australia: Independents, brewers protest wine in supermarkets plan

 

Source: TheShout

By James Atkinson

05/06/2013

 

Independent bottleshops, brewers and the health lobby have voiced their objections to a South Australian plan that would allow wine to be sold in supermarkets, which has support from lobbyists for IGA, Foodland, Coles and Woolworths.

 

The proposal for SA supermarkets with a minimum of 400sqm floor space to be able to sell bottled wine attracted a total of 59 published submissions, most of them in opposition.

 

The Australian Liquor Stores Association (ALSA) questioned the need for the new class of liquor licence, given that supermarkets are already able to apply for a liquor licence under existing laws, providing the licensed premises is classed as separate.

 

“It is important that the liquor licensing regime is fair and equitable with all liquor licence applicants treated the same, using the same assessment criteria and taking into account the merits of each application,” said ALSA CEO Terry Mott.

 

Staunchly resisting the proposal was the Australian Hotels Association – which launched the ‘Let’s Draw The Line’ campaign in February – as well as many independent bottleshop operators who made their own submissions, including Wayne Anderson, manager of Glynde Hotel Cellars.

 

Anderson said his Adelaide bottleshop already has nine liquor stores operated by Woolworths and Coles within a five kilometre radius.

 

“If the proposed amendments are passed there will be potentially another 16 licences granted to supermarkets within this same radius, eight of them owned by Woolworths and Coles, the rest trading under the IGA or Foodland banner,” he said.

 

“This is an excessive increase in licences that goes way beyond catering for the demand within the community,” Anderson said.

 

“Wine and grapes over beer and barley”

 

Several health organisations wrote to oppose the plan on the basis that it may cause alcohol-related harm, while the Brewers Association objected on the basis of “product discrimination”.

 

“It seems illogical that a South Australian Government would unfairly favour wine and grapes over beer and barley, yet they all contribute to the economy and its strong cultural heritage,” said CEO Denita Wawn.

 

The Independent Supermarket Retailers Guild of SA, which primarily represents the independently-owned Foodland and IGA stores – which do not have an existing liquor retail footprint and therefore have the most to gain – said it was “delighted” to support the proposal.

 

“Both Foodland and IGA owners have established a policy to stock and sell only branded South Australian wine in their supermarkets,” said CEO Colin Shearing.

 

“They will not introduce a house brand in any wine category and nor will they stock cleanskins.”

 

Proposal gets support from the chains

 

Representing Coles and Woolworths, the Australian National Retailers Association (ANRA) said it was “supportive overall” of the plan, calling for the new supermarket licensing scheme to be transparent and straightforward for applicants.

 

“The current liquor licence application process for retailers in South Australia is cumbersome and our members have experienced extreme difficulty in obtaining new licences,” ANRA said.

 

Woolworths provided its own submission, arguing that SA currently has just 194 retail liquor licences, the lowest density of packaged liquor licences in Australia.

 

“The benefits of the proposal will be particularly evident in rural and regional areas where choice for consumers is limited and communities are underserviced by packaged liquor outlets,” said Andrew Wilsmore, manager – public affairs at Woolworths Liquor Group.

 

Business SA CEO Nigel McBride said that if the state is serious about promoting its wine industry then wine in supermarkets is a “logical decision”.

 

“One cannot imagine visiting Paris and not being able to find Champagne in the supermarket so likewise, Clare Valley Riesling, Barossa Shiraz or Coonawarra Cabernet Sauvignon should also be available in supermarkets in South Australia,” he said.

Find Us Online

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Like Us On Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/franklinliquorsMA

Follow Us On Twitter

http://www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

 

Liquor Industry News 6-4-13

June 4, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday June 4th 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic  LEAF Morning BUT

A FRUIT Night. Great To Taste Or Drink Wine Tonight

 

AB InBev, Constellation Brands Seek Dismissal of Lawsuit

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Karen Gullo

Jun 4, 2013

 

Anheuser-Busch InBev NV (ABI) seeks dismissal of a private antitrust lawsuit alleging its $20 billion acquisition of Grupo Modelo SAB will lead to higher beer prices, while customers who filed the lawsuit asked a judge to postpone the deal.

 

Budweiser-maker AB InBev, the world’s largest beer company, called claims of nine beer customers that the deal will allow it to control Constellation Brands Inc. (STZ) and conspire to raise beer prices “outlandish and completely unsupportable.” Constellation also asked a judge to dismiss the lawsuit.

 

AB InBev is acquiring Grupo Modelo in a deal that calls for Constellation to buy the stake that Modelo holds in their joint U.S. distribution venture for $1.85 billion.

 

In a U.S. Justice Department-supported transaction, AB InBev made binding commitments to turn winemaker Constellation into a competing brewer that will produce and control all Modelo brands in the U.S., including Corona, the country’s biggest import, lawyers for the beermaker said in filings yesterday in federal court in San Francisco.

 

The antitrust complaint “should be seen for what it is: the latest in a line of shakedown attempts by plaintiff’s counsel premised on baseless assertions of fact,” said Allen Ruby, AB InBev’s attorney.

 

Brewery

 

Attorney Joseph Alioto, representing the nine beer consumers in the antitrust lawsuit, said Constellation has been inclined to follow AB InBev’s price increases before the deal, and AB InBev will be running the brewery and suppling the beer production during the first three years of the transaction.

 

He asked U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney to issue a temporary restraining order blocking the companies from finalizing the transaction today and order them to show why the deal shouldn’t be put on hold while the lawsuit proceeds.

 

“The new Constellation is under-capitalized and highly leveraged, having incurred billions of dollars in additional debt in order to make to acquisition,” Alioto said in a court filing yesterday. “As such it will be in no position to maintain lower prices in the face of ABI constant pressure to increase prices.”

 

The U.S. said its agreement with AB InBev to turn Constellation into a competing brewer could save beer drinkers almost $1 billion a year because of lower prices.

 

Alioto has sued to block other deals, including the one that created United Continental Holdings Inc. and the merger of Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and AirTran Holdings Inc.

 

The case is Edstrom v. Anheuser-Busch InBev NV, 13-cv-01309, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

 

 

——

Molson Coors – Buy ahead of investor day

 

Source: Nomura

June 04, 2013

 

European Beverages

Stock Rating: Buy

Target Price: USD 61.00

TAP.N (USD 49.41)

Ian Shackleton – NIplc

 

Investor day a key event

We see the investor day on 12 June as a material catalyst, as we expect firmer indications both on innovation as well as on cost-cutting targets. Our model assumes US 50m pa from cost savings across the business over the next three years. The later timing of the event (June vs usual timing of March) should give confidence that the new CFO has fully worked through the numbers.

 

Trading overall looks in line

Although industry volume momentum in US and Canada still looks sluggish, we see robust price/mix, esp in US, as well as better market share performance in the US, as positives. Although the UK remains tough, price/mix in C Europe looks strong.

 

Scope for further rerating

The investor day should support the thesis in our initiation report (dated 11 January 2013) where we expected rerating of the shares over the next 12 months provided the company delivered against consensus expectations. Further out, as the company delevers into 2014, we see scope for using capital to renew the share buy-back programme.

 

Valuation still low

Although valuation has moved up slightly since our initiation (was at under 10x 2014E P/E, now at c12x but still well below beer average of 16.4x), our target price would still only assume 2014E P/E of under 14x.

 

 

——

CEDC Confirms Effective Date of its Reorganization Plan Expected to Occur within Three Business Days       

 

Source: PR Newswire

May 31st

 

Central European Distribution Corporation (CEDC) confirmed that CEDC’s Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”), which was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on May 13, 2013, is expected to become effective within three business days, by June 5, 2013.

 

Following the effective date, CEDC will make a cash payment to holders of its 2013 Convertible Notes and certain of its 2016 Senior Secured Notes and issue new notes to holders of its 2016 Senior Secured Notes and new shares to Roust Trading Ltd. (“RTL”).  All of the previously issued 2013 Convertible Notes and 2016 Senior Secured Notes and shares of outstanding CEDC common stock will be cancelled. The Plan will result in a reduction of approximately $665.2 million of debt of CEDC. As a result of the cancellation of CEDC’s common stock, as of the effective date CEDC anticipates it will cease to be a public company in Poland and that its common stock will no longer be subject to listing and trading on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. RTL, owned by Mr. Roustam Tariko, will receive 100% of the outstanding stock of the reorganized CEDC in exchange for funding CEDC’s cash payments under the Plan and cancelling CEDC’s existing debt obligations to RTL.

 

In addition, CEDC announced that on Wednesday, May 28, Alfa Bank, one of CEDC’s significant financial partners in Russia, resumed lending to CEDC by providing access to previously established credit lines with the bank. CEDC was able to draw down 1 billion Russian roubles (approximately $30 million U.S. dollars equivalent) under these credit lines, thereby further enhancing the liquidity position of its operations in advance of the effective date.

 

Distributions by CEDC to holders of the 2013 Convertible Notes are expected to be made following the effective date of the Plan. Distributions by CEDC to holders of 2016 Senior Secured Notes are expected to be made as soon as practicable after CEDC confirms elections under the Plan’s cash option. CEDC anticipates that the cash option elections will be confirmed five business days following the effective date and that cash distributions to holders of 2016 Senior Secured Notes will be made on or about five business days following the effective date, and that distribution of new notes to holders of 2016 Senior Secured Notes will be made on or about ten business days following the effective date.

 

CEDC and its U.S. subsidiaries, CEDC Finance Corporation International, Inc. and CEDC Finance Corporation LLC (collectively CEDC FinCo),  commenced voluntary proceedings under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on April 7, 2013.

 

The Chapter 11 filing did not involve CEDC’s operating subsidiaries in Poland, Russia, Ukraine or Hungary. Those operations, which are independently funded and generate their own revenues, have continued normally and without interruption during the U.S. restructuring process.

 

Copies of documents filed by CEDC in its Chapter 11 proceedings before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, including the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order confirming the Second Amended and Restated Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization of Central European Distribution Corporation, ET. al., are available without charge at: http://gcginc.com/cases/cedc

 

 

——

PANACHE BEVERAGES TO ACQUIRE EMPIRE WINERY AND DISTILLERY

 

DISTILLERY OPERATIONS AND SALES VETERAN JACOB CALL NAMED PRESIDENT OF NEW PANACHE DISTILLERY

 

Source: Panache Distillery

Jun 3rd

 

Panache Beverages Inc., a premier alcoholic beverage company that produces Wódka vodka and Alibi American Whiskey, has signed an asset purchase agreement to acquire the Empire Winery and Distillery in Hudson, Florida.  The move deepens Panache’s commitment to the long-term growth and vertical integration of its business.

 

The expected acquisition of the facility, which is anticipated to re-open as Panache Distillery before the end of 2013 includes right, title and interest to all assets including the buildings, machinery, inventory and equipment. The Panache Distillery will offer full integration of domestic distillation, bottling and sales operations.

 

James Dale, CEO of Panache Beverages, Inc. explains, “Moving to manufacturing is a critical step for both Panache and its brands.  The distillery will provide us with means to manage the supply of our own brands while also providing the parent company with new and diverse revenue streams.”

 

Production of top selling national spirits brands, Wódka and Alibi American Whiskey, will transition to the Panache Distillery. The move strengthens Panache’s leadership position within the distilled spirits industry by facilitating control of supply chain and increased margin and cost control.

 

The distillery acquisition will also diversify the Panache business, adding bulk spirits production and turnkey third-party contract distillation and co-packing as ancillary businesses and additional revenue streams.

 

Jacob Call, the former Senior Manager of Distillery and Bulk Sales for the largest distillery and spirits bottler in the Southeast United States, has been appointed as the President of Sales and Operations for Panache Distillery.

 

About Panache Beverages

Panache Beverages, Inc. (OTCQB:WDKA), based in New York, NY is an alcoholic beverage company specializing in the development, global sales and marketing of spirits brands. The Company’s expertise lies in the strategic development and aggressive early growth of its brands establishing its assets as viable and attractive acquisition candidates for the major global spirits companies. Panache intends to build its brands as individual acquisition candidates while continuing to develop its pipeline of new brands in to the Panache portfolio. Panache’s existing portfolio contains three brands: Wódka

Vodka, Alchemia Infused Vodka and Alibi American Whiskey.

 

 

——

Global shock as manufacturing contracts in US and China

 

Manufacturing has begun to contract in the US and China for the first time since the Lehman crisis, raising fears of a synchronized downturn in the world’s two largest economies.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

03 Jun 2013

 

The closely-watched ISM index of US factories tumbled through the “boom-bust line” of 50 to 49, far below expectations. It is the lowest since the depths of the crisis in mid-2009 and a clear sign that US budget cuts are starting to squeeze the economy. New orders plunged 3.5 to 48.8 on weak foreign demand and reduced federal contracts.

 

The news came hours after HSBC said its index for China also fell below 50, a major inflexion point for the world’s industrial workshop.

 

“This is not a good moment for the world economy,” said David Bloom, currency chief at HSBC. “The manufacturing indices came in weaker than expected in China, Korea, India and Russia, and then we got America’s ISM.

 

“We thought we had a clear picture that the US was recovering, Japan was printing money and were we’re back to happy days, and now suddenly a huge spanner has been thrown in the works.”

 

Mr Bloom said a sharp strengthening of the Japanese yen on safe-haven flows and the 16pc fall of the Nikkei index from its peak are disturbing. “People are asking whether the ‘Abenomics’ bubble is bursting.”

 

The OECD says the US is tightening fiscal policy by 3.2pc of GDP this year, the biggest squeeze in half a century. Consumers spent their way through the initial shock in the first quarter by slashing the national savings rate to 2.5pc.

 

“People have been living in a psychological bubble,” said Charles Dumas from Lombard Street Research. “They ignored the cuts but now they are starting to feel it.”

 

The ISM quoted a string of gloomy comments from different sectors, such as “government spending has tightened” (computers), “over the past 20 days we have seen the trend flatten” (furniture), or “downturn in European and Chinese markets is having a negative effect on our business” (machinery).

 

Wall Street reacted calmly to the ISM shock, betting that the US Federal Reserve will delay plans to taper its monthly bond purchases of $85bn (£55.5bn). Stephen Lewis from Monument Securities said this may be a misjudgement. The latest minutes of the Federal Advisor Council, which advises the Fed on markets, are packed with warnings over the side-effects of quantitative easing.

 

The council said it is “not clear” that QE is boosting the economy, and warned that zero rates are pushing pension funds underwater on their liabilities, and may be causing firms to defer investment on the grounds that rates will remain low.

 

They also said Fed purchases of mortgage bonds was depriving banks of “bread and butter” business, pushing them into riskier corporate and emerging market debt, and blowing a “bubble” in fixed income and equity markets.

 

“Normally the council just goes along with the Fed says but it is clear that they have become more alarmed at aspects of Fed policy, so this is significant,” said Mr Lewis.

 

Fed chairman Ben Bernanke has since begun to echo some of the concerns, testifying to Congress on May 22 that “very low interest rates, if maintained too long, could undermine financial stability”.

 

The Boston Fed’s ultra-dovish president Eric Rosengren has also shifted ground, saying the bank may need to start tapering soon. The Fed’s centre of gravity has clearly shifted.

 

The concern is that the Fed has largely made up its mind to turn off the liquidity spigot and will not be deterred unless the economy deteriorates dramatically. Or as one trader commented, the “Bernanke Put” has become the “Bernanke Call”.

 

 

——

Leadership Lessons from Constellation Brands CEO Rob Sands

 

Source: Forbes

Jun 3rd

 

Constellation Brands CEO Rob Sands: He listens to his employees and prioritizes the important stuff.

 

Last June, Constellation Brands STZ +0.75%, the giant wine, beer and spirits producer and marketer based in Victor, N.Y., announced it was buying the 50% of Mexican beer producer and marketer Crown Imports that it didn’t already own, for $1.85 billion, from Anheuser-Busch InBev . The deal grew out of Anheuser-Busch’s takeover of Mexican brewer Grupo Modelo and the Justice Department’s insistence, for anti-trust reasons, that Anheuser-Busch sell some of its U.S. beer interests, including the top-selling Corona brand. Because of the DOJ’s pressure, Anheuser-Busch also agreed to sell Constellation a Mexican brewery and perpetual rights for the Grupo Modelo brands in the U.S., for an additional $2.9 billion, bringing the deal to $4.75 billlion.

 

Constellation is the biggest wine producer in the world, with brands like Robert Mondavi, Clos du Bois and Manischewitz. It also owns spirits brands including Svedka vodka and it has annual sales of some $2.8 billion. The Crown Imports deal is expected to nearly double revenues to $5 billion. The market loves the deal, driving Constellation shares up from $22 when it was first announced, to $52. The transaction is expected to close in the next week.

 

Robert Sands has been President and CEO of Constellation since July of 2007. His father Marvin founded the company in 1945, when the American wine industry consisted mainly of desert wine that shipped in bulk and was bottled like milk. The business has transformed since then, as Constellation acquired wine labels around the world and focused on premium brands. After graduating from law school and practicing for two years, Rob joined the company in 1986 as general counsel. Rob’s older brother Richard became CEO in 1993 and held the top job until 2007, when he became Executive Chairman and Rob became CEO. During his tenure as CEO, Rob sold off 200 brands and focused the company on premium labels.

 

I talked to Rob about what he learned from his father and brother about being the boss, what it was like to step into the CEO’s job just before the Great Recession hit, how he handled the downturn, and his strategy going forward, including how the Crown Imports acquisition plays into Constellation’s plans. Here are excerpts from our interview:

 

What leadership lessons did you learn from your father?

 

He really cared about the people who worked for him and he had an open door policy. Regardless of whether the person worked on the bottling line floor or was a senior executive, he treated everyone the same. He was a strong believer in leadership by example and having people emulate what he did as opposed to telling people what to do. He taught my brother and me that the TV version of how senior executives manage, by sitting around, telling people what to do, was not a successful model. He encouraged people to do their best and enjoy what they do. He accomplished things through collaboration, as opposed to command and control.

 

Can you think of a story about how he collaborated with employees?

 

He spent a lot of time playing bridge with our head of production and our head of sales and he gave them a lot of latitude. It was one of them who came up with our first brand, Richard’s Wild Irish Rose, named for my brother Richard.

 

Did you always think you would wind up running the company?

 

No. In college I was a philosophy major and was considering going to graduate school and getting a Ph.D. But during college I decided that going to law school would be more practical. I practiced law for a couple of years and realized it was a bit of a grind and not very interesting. I thought that being in the family business would be a lot more exciting.

 

Your older brother became CEO seven years after you joined the company. What leadership lessons did you learn from him?

 

Though my father was very smart and very analytical, my brother was super analytical. He was much more interested in specific metrics around the performance of the company and whether it was creating shareholder value. He made sure we understood in great detail what the returns were projected to be on our acquisitions.

 

Tell me about the challenges of becoming CEO.

 

I had been Chief Operating Officer from 2002-2007 so it was an obvious progression for me. My brother is seven years older than me and he stayed on as Executive Chairman. But 2008 and 2009 were interesting times. When I took over the company we had a significant amount of debt, 5.3 times EBITDA. We had acquired a lot of businesses all over the world. We had a far-flung and decentralized business. I had to shift the focus from being in hyper-acquisitive mode to being more of a world-class consumer goods product company and consolidating our operations.

 

How bad was the recession for your business and how did you get through it?

 

It wasn’t particularly severe. We decided to focus on premium products where there was a greater return on capital. We shut off all of our value businesses and centralized the company. We sold our Australian wine business, our Washington state wine business, our U.K. business. We sold off a billion-plus in assets.

 

How did you decide to focus on premium brands?

 

It was a collaborative process with people whose job it is to think about strategy and growth with me. Shortly after I became CEO I brought in Boston Consulting Group to do a portfolio analysis on our whole business. We determined what parts of the business were generating return on invested capital. I have a senior management team who all come from big companies. The CFO is from Pepsi. Our chief legal officer is from TD Bank and First Federal Bank. Our chief human resources officer is from Frito Lay, Pepsi and Prudential. We had a lot of diverse ideas. That’s how you know what to do: you listen to other people.

 

That sounds like the leadership lesson you learned from your father.

 

It’s not about sitting there and telling people what to do and giving top-down direction. It’s really about hiring great people and then listening to them, taking their ideas and figuring out how to put them into action, making sure you have a lot of diverse points of view so you seize on the best course of action, instead of thinking you’re the guy who knows everything.

 

Are there any other leadership lessons you’ve learned as CEO?

 

It’s important to maintain an entrepreneurial spirit throughout the corporation. Also part of leadership is making sure you’ve got a reward system in place so that people want to win and are creating their own wealth through the company’s success. Our people get bonuses, stock options and stock-based long-term incentives. We do that down to the manager and director level. A typical vice president who has been here 12 or 15 years has made $1 million in savings.

 

How is the Crown Imports deal going to affect your company?

 

Our market cap went from $4 billion to over $10 billion as a consequence of this deal.

 

What challenges lie ahead for you?

 

The wine business is fast-growing but it’s highly fragmented so we have the challenge of continuing to grow and build brands in a fragmented category. On the beer side, we’re the third largest player in the U.S. with a premium portfolio of beers that is fast-growing and takes advantage of favorable demographic trends, in particular the growth of the Hispanic population in the U.S. We have to keep that portfolio relevant and premium and we have to continue to innovate.

 

Do you have any time management secrets to share?

 

It’s all about having good people and letting them do what they know how to do so you don’t become overwhelmed with details best left to others. You should really narrow down the things you focus on. We have something called our executive management committee strategic agenda. It’s the six or seven things the senior leadership team needs to focus on. You have to know what’s important and what’s not.

 

 

——

Auction Napa Valley smashes record

 

Source: Decanter

by Courtney Humiston in Napa

Monday 3 June 2013

Auction Napa Valley, the annual charity auction, has raised US$16.9m, far exceeding the previous record of US$10.5m set in 2005.

 

In three-and-a-half hours of intense bidding on Saturday at the Meadowood hotel in St Helena, the 33rd edition of the event raised a record US$14.3m, bringing the total – combined with the online auction and the barrel auction – to US$16.9m.

 

Exclusive experiences, expensive cars and travel-oriented lots dominated the offerings and drove sales skyward.

 

The highest-earning single lot was from Korean-owned Dana Estates. When the bidding, fuelled by fist-pumping and pompom-waving, reached US$500,000 Dana doubled the package-which included three double magnums and a seven-day trip for four to South Korea – bringing the total to over US$1m.

 

Bill and Deborah Harlan, whose lot stayed focused on their wine – a 20-vintage retrospective tasting of Harlan Estate for eight people- came in second at US$800,000 with fellow Napa cult winery Screaming Eagle not far behind, offering a single 12-litre bottle of vintage 2010 that went for US$500k.

 

Friday’s barrel auction of mostly Cabernet Sauvignon from 2011 and 2012, held at Raymond Vineyards in St Helena, was as competitive. Fans of Shafer proved unwavering, paying US$78,000 for a barrel (10 cases) with the highest bidder offering nearly $8,000 for 12 bottles. Realm Cellars (US$61,350) and Tim Mondavi’s Continuum (US$59,200) were not far behind.

 

In April, Garen Staglin of Staglin Family Vineyard, who along with his wife Shari and children Shannon and Brandon are this year’s honorary chairs, told Decanter.com that he wanted to get ‘the right people in the room’ in order to raise the most money in the history of the event – a goal that he achieved.

 

Shari Staglin said, ‘Even after 33 years, Auction Napa Valley still has some surprises up its sleeve. We are grateful to the bidders, the vintners and the 500 community volunteers who, year after year, work together to showcase what makes Napa Valley such a special place – good food, great wine and a community spirit unlike any other.’

 

Auction Napa Valley, which is organised and run by trade association Napa Valley Vintners, has donated US$110m to health, youth and affordable housing non-profit programs. Founded in 1981, the event takes place over four days in June.

 

 

——

Elysee Palace wine sale fetches nearly triple estimate

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Monday 3 June 2013

 

The public auction of Eylsee Palace wines saw frenzied bidding over two sessions, raising ?718,000 (including auction charges) – a sizeable increase on the estimated ?250,000.

 

The auction, which took place at the Hôtel Drouot in Paris, saw the sale of 171 lots in an evening sale beginning at 7.30pm on Thursday 30, then a further 380 lots the following afternoon of Friday 31, so 552 in total, accounting for 1200 bottles of wine from the French government cellars.

 

The highest prices were seen for a Pétrus 1990 for ?7625 (including charges) against an estimate of ?2500. An Angelus 1961, estimated at ?220, sold for ?1100, while a Latour 1982, estimated at ?2200 sold for ?4625. ‘The Elysée Palace effect,’ as the spokesperson for the Drouot auction house confirmed to Decanter.com.

 

As expected the sale, which was overseen by auctioneer Ghislaine Kapandji, attracted large numbers of Asian buyers, as well as those from the US, Europe and France itself.

 

Fan Dongxing, an importer from Shanghai, travelled to France for the auction and bought large amounts of Cognac, as well as the Pétrus. ‘The Chinese like French wine,’ he told assembled media at press conference held after the sale on Thursday night, ‘and it is a great honour that these wines came from the Elysée cellar.’ He added that he would be selling them on to professionals back in China.

 

All bottles had labels stating they came from Elysée Palace cellar with the date of sale. The wines themselves were not present in the room, but displayed on a screen during bidding. They had been available for viewing beforehand.

 

Not everyone was happy at the sale however. Oliver Poels, editor-in-chief of the Revue du Vin de France had called the wines ‘a national treasure’, and Michel-Jack Chasseuil, one of France’s most important private collectors with a cellar of over 40,000 wines, wrote an open letter to president Francois Hollande, denouncing the sale for selling off the best bottles of France to ‘overseas billionaires’ for a ‘few crumbs of bread’.

 

The proceeds from the sale are to be reinvested in buying more modest wines for the government cellar, and to fund social projects.

 

 

——

Full speed ahead at LVMH

 

Source: the drinks business

by Gabriel Savage

3rd June, 2013

 

Jean-Guillaume Prats, the new head of Moët Hennessy’s Estates & Wines division, has outlined an ambitious timetable for its new Indian and Chinese wine projects.

 

July is due to see the official investiture of a new winery for Domaine Chandon’s Chinese outpost, while Domaine Chandon in India is set to unveil its inaugural wine in October. 2013 will also mark Moët Hennessy’s first harvest for its red wine project in China.

 

Turning first to Chandon’s Chinese operation, which is located beside the Yellow River in Ningxia Province, close to the Mongolian border, Prats described this warm, dry area with light, fairly acidic soils as “extremely suitable for our sparkling wine project.”

 

Having produced its first vintage in 2012, the result will “probably” appear on the market in 2014 after further maturation in bottle, Prats told the drinks business.

 

Reminding that “Moët was the first to go to the New World,” he noted that 2013 marks the 40th anniversary of the establishment of Domaine Chandon in Napa Valley, California.

 

Since then, the Chandon name has expanded to wineries in Argentina, Brazil and Australia, with these latest projects in China and India marking the next phase of Moët Hennessy’s pioneering ethos.

 

“Moët has always been a forward thinker,” emphasised Prats, who joined the luxury drinks subsidiary of LVMH in February from his previous role as managing director of Bordeaux second growth Château Cos D’Estournel. “It’s really part of our DNA that is based on two pillars: long established brands and innovation.”

 

Prats described one of his priorities in this new role as being to strengthen the Chandon brand across these various sources and its primarily local distribution markets.

 

“Soon we will have six estates with a common packaging, style and market dedication to feed the young, up and coming consumers who want great bubbles, but maybe don’t want to spend quite the same money as Champagne,” he told db.

 

Although acknowledging the ?500-a-bottle red wine launched this year by Chandon’s Ningxia neighbour Château Hansen, Prats confirmed that, in this location at least, “we will not go into the still wine business.”

 

That’s not to suggest that Moët Hennessy is ignoring the huge popularity of red wines in the Chinese market – this autumn it will harvest the first grapes from its other estate, this time 2,600m up in the Shangri-La mountains of Hunan Province, close to Tibet.

 

Here, at the same latitude at Morocco, on a site founded upon gravel washed down by the Mekong River, the focus is on red wine from Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot grapes.

 

With no winemaking facility or brand name yet in place, Prats will not even confirm whether this year’s harvest will even go on sale. “We will only put something onto the market that we are proud of,” he insists, while adding by way of reassurance: “I think we have something exceptional.”

 

In addition to these two major Chinese projects, construction is already well underway near Nashik, Maharashtra, for Moët Hennessy’s first winery in India.

 

Having produced its first vintage in 2012 at a separate facility, the initial result is due to launch this October in Mumbai as the sixth piece in the Chandon jigsaw.

 

Drawing a diplomatic comparison between the challenges of producing wines in India and China, Prats remarked: “Things take more time in India.” However, with India’s federal and state import duty structure proving prohibitive for many foreign wine brands, he balanced this with the observation that “clearly there is an advantage to being a local producer.”

 

Highlighting a further appeal presented by India for the Chandon brand, Prats noted: “In India today there is a slightly more love for bubbles than there is in China.”

 

From a broader perspective, Prats pointed to the strategic thinking behind this strengthening and expansion of the Chandon brand. “We’re exactly where the market is going,” he emphasised.

 

“The market wants great bubbles of two types: celebration wines like Veuve Clicquot or Moët & Chandon and then with Chandon we are just below that for a young, upcoming people who maybe don’t want to spend quite that much.”

 

A full interview with Jean-Guillaume Prats, including his plans for the rest of the Estates & Wines portfolio, potential gaps to be filled and where Bordeaux is going wrong, will appear in July’s issue of the drinks business.

 

 

——

Shannon Ridge Acquires Historic Lake County Property

 

Source: Balzac

Jun 3rd

 

Shannon Ridge Family of Wines is growing again with the purchase of 100 acres of the historic Ogulin Estate, located in the cool High Valley Appellation of Lake County.

 

Shannon Ridge will be rebuilding and preserving the 1870s-era home and winery on the property. Currently there are 18 acres under vine, and Shannon Ridge plans to plant an additional 62 acres to cabernet sauvignon, zinfandel, petite sirah, and chardonnay in 2014.

 

The property was sold to Shannon Ridge by owners Harold and Grace Ogulin. Harold Ogulin is a third generation descendant of original Lake County pioneers. He and Grace will have a life estate on the property.

 

The portfolio of award-winning Shannon Ridge wines includes the Single Vineyard Collection and High Elevation Collection, as well as affiliated brands Vigilance Vineyards, Dalliance, and Cross Springs. Shannon Ridge’s vineyards are certified sustainable by Farming for Flavors ®, and are known for their woolly compost machines – a flock of 1,000 sheep, complete with shepherd and a team of highly trained sheepdogs. The sheep do an excellent job of canopy management and leaf removal, and pick the vineyard clean after harvest. They also manage the cover crop in the spring and work hard to reduce fire danger in the surrounding hills the remainder of the year.

 

 

——

French wine ‘has Italian origins’

 

Source: BBC News

By Jason Palmer

June 3rd

 

Evidence of the earliest winemaking in France has been described – and it indicates Italian origins.

 

Shaped vessels called amphoras, known to have been imported from the Etruscan people of Italy around 500 BC, have shown chemical evidence of wine.

 

A wine press identified in the same region shows that the beverage quickly gained favour and launched a local industry that would conquer the world.

 

The study appears in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

 

There is also evidence that the wines contained herbal and pine resins, which may have helped preserve them for shipping.

 

The history of wine development is a patchy one, principally because wine leaves behind few chemical markers that archaeologists today can ascribe definitively to wine, rather than other agricultural products.

 

The earliest known examples of wine-making as we know it are in the regions of modern-day Iran, Georgia, and Armenia – and researchers believe that modern winemaking slowly spread westward from there to Europe.

 

In 2004, Patrick McGovern of the University of Pennsylvania Museum led a team whose findings suggested that wine based on rice may have been developed in China at the same time or even before efforts in the Middle East.

 

But details for many parts of the spread from the Middle East, including into France, remained unclear.

 

Dr McGovern and colleagues have now pinned down another part of the story in the new study.

 

“You could argue that it comes [into France from] farther north on the continent,” he told BBC News.

 

“You could have it spreading across Germany, say, from Romania – but this really provides a definite set of evidence that it came from Italy.”

Molecular historians

 

The team was examining what are called amphoras, vessels designed for carrying both liquids and solids and for neat packing into a boat’s hull.

 

The Etruscans, a pre-Roman civilisation in Italy, are thought to have gained wine culture from the Phoenicians – who spread throughout the Mediterranean from the early Iron Age onward – because they used similarly shaped amphoras.

 

Further, it is known that the Etruscans shipped goods to southern France in these amphoras – but until now it remained unclear if they held wine or other goods.

Wine pressing platforms were usually found outside of towns, nearer the vineyards themselves Wine pressing platforms were usually found outside of towns, nearer the vineyards themselves

 

Dr McGovern’s team focused on the coastal site of Lattara, near the town of Lattes south of Montpellier, where the importation of amphoras continued up until the period 525-475 BC.

 

They used a high-precision analytical tool called gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, which provides a list of the molecules absorbed into the pottery of the amphoras. The results showed that they did once contain wine – as well as pine resin and herbal components.

 

But more surprising was the find of a wine-pressing platform, where grapes were ground and liquid drained off.

 

“In a walled town like this, it is unusual to find a wine press from an early period,” Dr McGovern said. “Finding the chemical evidence for the press, that was a surprise.”

 

The find is consistent with a pattern seen elsewhere – that wine is introduced from abroad, but a local culture eventually seeks to transplant the grapes and grow their own, local wine industry.

 

“From there, [winemaking] spread up the Rhone River, the domesticated vine gets transplanted, it crosses with the wild grapes and all sorts of interesting cultivars develop – those are the ones that spread around the world.

 

“Most of the wine we have today is from French cultivars, which ultimately derive from the Near-East cultivar via the Etruscans,” he explained.

 

“There’s still a lot of blanks to fill in, but I find it very exciting.”

 

The methods used in the study have pushed the boundaries of what can be gathered chemically from archaeological remains such as those in Lattara.

 

Regis Gougeon of the University Institute of Vine and Wine at the University of Bourgogne said the work was “undoubtedly a good example of technology and methodology leading the science”.

 

“It was already acknowledged – in particular thanks to Patrick McGovern’s work – that viniculture might have travelled from the Near East to the Mediterranean Sea area about 3000 BC,” Dr Gougeon told BBC News.

 

“However, this Etruscan hypothesis is indeed rather new and sheds an interesting light on the possible input of this educated and art-oriented civilisation.”

 

 

——

Restaurant chains expect to raise menu prices

 

More than 90 percent of respondents to a SpenDifference survey said they plan to hike prices during the remainder of the year

 

Source: NRN

Mark Brandau   

Jun. 3, 2013

 

A vast majority of restaurant chain operators said they expect to raise menu prices during the balance of the year, according to a new survey by SpenDifference.

 

Denver-based SpenDifference found that more than 90 percent of respondents said they plan to hike menu prices this year, projecting an average increase of 1.6 percent. One-third of respondents said they plan to raise menu prices 2 percent or more.

 

The operators’ sentiments contrast with the first quarter of 2013, when restaurant chains largely resisted raising prices. SpenDifference completed the survey the week of May 13 and found that 64 percent of respondents kept prices flat or raised them only 0.5 percent in the first quarter.

 

SpenDifference said respondents were evenly split among full-service and limited-service brands, and that chains represented in the study were as small as fewer than 100 units or as large as more than 800 locations. The company said just under 50 restaurant chains participated in the survey.

 

Chain executives polled for the supply chain consulting firm’s survey also projected an average same-store sales increase of 2.2 percent for 2013, which would mark a 25-percent increase over their collective results from SpenDifference’s survey last year. Respondents predicted that sales gains would come mostly from price increases, with stronger traffic accounting for only about 25 percent of the growth.

 

“From the data and discussions with our members, it appears that they believe consumers may be more willing to accept higher prices, especially with the economy strengthening,” Brad Moore, the firm’s senior vice president, said in a statement. “But even the larger price increases they are planning this year will only cover about 75 percent of expected menu inflation, which they forecast at just under 2 percent.”

 

Through the first-quarter earnings season, chains have addressed whether they will raise menu prices in 2013, but no real consensus has emerged for the industry as a whole.

 

McDonald’s disclosed during a conference call for its first-quarter earnings, in which domestic same-store sales decreased 1.2 percent, that it raised menu prices by about 0.6 percent during the first quarter, replacing about half of a 1.2-percent increase from the prior year that was rolling off.

 

“The reason for that is because consumers are very sensitive to price,” chief executive Don Thompson said during the call. “We don’t have the inflationary environment or the consumer sentiment environment to go out and take the same kind of price increases that historically we did. We do believe that this is not a structural kind of a change; we think that it is based upon the economy at this point.”

 

Buffalo Wild Wings has dealt with commodity pressures due to volatile chicken wing prices over the last several years. The company’s first-quarter same-store sales rose 1.4 percent at company locations and 2.2 percent at franchised units, despite food and labor costs driving a contraction in margins of more than 3 percent.

 

The Minneapolis-based chain’s biggest cost control initiative this year is the forthcoming roll-out of a new pricing system that will price wings per portion rather than by individual wings. The brand has yet to determine whether it will raise prices when the new menu goes systemwide in July. Buffalo Wild Wings’ prices were 4.7 percent higher than last year’s menu prices in the first quarter, and that level will roll off to 2 percent higher and 0.2 percent higher in the third and fourth quarters, respectively.

 

Denver-based Chipotle was similarly noncommittal about raising menu prices this year in its first-quarter earnings call. Higher food costs squeezed Chipotle’s margins more than 1 percent in the first quarter, chief financial officer Jack Hartung said, but commodity costs were stabilizing, and the brand is still considering whether to raise any prices – which would not happen before late summer or fall in any event.

 

In Krispy Kreme Doughnuts’ first quarter, the chain reported an 11.4-percent increase in same-store sales at company-owned locations. Only 3 percent of that gain came from higher menu prices, officials said.

 

The 6.6-percent increase in same-store sales for Ruth’s Chris Steakhouse in the first quarter included a 2-percent menu price hike that occurred during the period, officials for parent company Ruth’s Hospitality Group said. Yet they added that Ruth’s Chris would try to mitigate the need for further menu price increases in the near future.

 

“While we believe we have additional pricing power, we will continue to be thoughtful and prudent, with respect to future increases,” chief executive Michael O’Donnell said. “It is still our strategy to focus on growing sales primarily through traffic to maintain our value orientation.”

 

Ruth’s also said it had contracted 40 percent of its beef needs for the remainder of 2013, at prices that averaged 4 percent to 6 percent above last year’s prices.

 

Nearly three-fourths of respondents to SpenDifference’s survey said renegotiating commodities contracts was their preferred cost control strategy, while 60 percent said they would promote limited-time offers or core menu items with more favorable margins.

 

“To protect or improve their margins, operators need to look beyond menu price increases and contract negotiations and find other ways to save money in their supply chains,” Moore said.

 

 

——

Ahold Remains Cautious For 2013, Ups Share Buyback

 

Source: Dow Jones

Jun 3rd

 

Dutch retailer Royal Ahold NV (AH.AE) Tuesday said first quarter net profit was boosted by the sale of its stake in Swedish retailer ICA and increased its share buyback program, but added it remains cautious about the prospects for the rest of the year.

 

MAIN FACTS:

 

– Sales 10.1 billion euro, up 4.4% at constant exchange rates.

– At constant exchange rates, net sales increased by 4.4%

– Underlying operating income 416 million euro, up 0.4% at constant exchange rates.

– Underlying operating margin 4.1% compared to 4.3% in the first quarter of 2012

– Operating income 345 million euro, down 68 million euro due to a 63 million euro pension settlement

– Net income 1.951 billion euro, of which 1.748 billion euro related to the sale of Ahold’s stake in ICA

– Share buyback program increased to 2 billion euro, to be completed by end of 2014

– Ahold continued to gain market share in its major markets as a result of identical sales growth, the expansion of its store network, and strong growth in the on-line business.

– “We remain cautious in our outlook for 2013 but we are committed to deliver on our Reshaping Retail strategy,” Chief executive Dick Boer said.

– Ahold remains on target to deliver 600 million euro in cost reductions, to be completed in 2014

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Liquor privatization issue down to the wire as Lt. Gov. Jim Cawley to testify

 

Source: Patriot News

Sue Gleiter

June 03, 2013

 

It has been a very long last call in Pennsylvania. For more than two years, lawmakers have debated the pros and cons of scraping the state’s 80-year-old liquor monopoly.

 

Will a sale of the state’s 600 wine and liquor stores generate a financial boost to the state’s budget? How will the 4,000 state workers be compensated? Will cases of drunken driving and underage drinking rise or drop in a free market?

 

So many ‘what if’s” as the clock ticks.

 

On Tuesday, the Senate Law and Justice Committee will host its third and final hearing targeting liquor privatization. The pressure is mounting.

 

Lt. Gov. Jim Cawley is scheduled to testify on behalf of the governor’s administration. Gov. Tom Corbett has said he would like to see a proposal on his desk by the June 30 budget deadline.

 

This is not the first time Pennsylvania has attempted to pass legislation to privatize the state’s liquor stores. Both governors Dick Thornburgh and Tom Ridge unsuccessfully tried.

 

The latest efforts were spearheaded more than two years ago by House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, an Allegheny Republican. He introduced a bill in June 2012 but it failed to pick up momentum.

 

Earlier this year, Gov. Corbett energized the push to privatize during a Pittsburgh press conference. The governor proposed funding educational programs through a potential sale of the state-run system.

 

“Why do we continue to deal with an antiquated liquor system that is 75 years old? The question should be ‘Why don’t we have choice? Why don’t we have convenience like the other 48 states in the union?'” Corbett said.

 

In March, the House of Representatives passed what was deemed a historic bill designed to dismantle the state-run stores in favor of opening up liquor sales to private business.

 

The bill allows beer distributors first shot at 1,200 wine and liquor licenses and would allow supermarkets to sell wine.

 

Turzai called the proposal “A-plus product.” “This is a great opportunity for Pennsylvania. It is a historic opportunity for Pennsylvania,” he said.

 

But not everyone is in agreement. Some of the most outspoken opponents against privatization include the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 who have stood their ground under leader Wendell Young IV.

 

Nicknamed “the yellow shirts” for the bright union shirts, members have crowded into hearings and converged at the Capitol to spread their message. Most recently, the union paid for radio and television advertisements touting Corbett’s push to privatize as a “reckless scheme.”

 

Along with union members, beer distributors have been critical of some elements of the privatization legislation. On one side they would like to sell smaller packages of beer beyond cases but on the other side they say competition from the private sector would create an uneven playing field and hurt business.

 

“Eighty to 90 percent of our income comes from beer sales. How are we going to be making a living if everyone has it?” asked Mark Tanczos, president of the Malt Beverage Distributors Association of Pennsylvania.

 

Their biggest competitors would include grocery stores who applaud the idea of selling alcohol, whether it be wine, beer and liquor.

 

Giant Food Stores, Weis Markets, Target and Walmart have all said they would sell alcohol just as they do in their stores in other states.

 

Already, more than 150 supermarkets in Pennsylvania sell beer via restaurant liquor licenses. Those licenses require supermarkets to have separate cash registers and sit-down cafes.

 

And there is room for growth. David McCorkle, president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Food Merchants Association in Camp Hill, said the bill currently would carve out about 820 grocery licenses, not enough to allow the more than 5,000 grocery outlets throughout the state, to sell wine.

 

The bill also leaves convenience stores out of the equation. McCorkle would like to see more grocery licenses, and licenses for convenience stores.

 

Then there are the consumers. Everyone says they want to be able to buy wine in the supermarket or a six-pack at the local beer distributor.

 

But when you boil down the issue, it’s not at the top of most voters’ agendas.

 

In a recent Franklin & Marshall College poll 47 percent of voters said they support selling off the state-run stores to the private sector, a drop from 53 percent in February. In addition, the number of those who say they strongly oppose privatization is 31 percent, up from 24 percent in February.

 

“I think in the last couple of months there is less support for liquor privatization. There has been a long debate and it centers around a lot of things,” said poll director G. Terry Madonna.

 

So will this be the year Pennsylvania uncorks a privatization deal?

 

Senate Law and Justice Committee chairman Sen. Chuck McIlhinney, a Bucks County Republican, has said he will introduce his own bill this month. But he has left many scratching their heads with his shifting positions and conflicting statements.

 

“Sen. McIlhinney is trying to navigate the turf wars among a variety of interest groups . all while appeasing his own constituents and hanging onto to his seat,” said Ed Uravic, a Harrisburg University of Science and Technology professor who spent 20 years as a GOP legislative aide in Harrisburg and Washington.

 

“He could be dragging his feet, or he could be making a political move,” Uravic added.

 

 

——

Washington: Guest – Legislature should reject Costco’s unfair liquor legislation

 

The Legislature should not support changes to Initiative 1183, proposed by Costco, the main backer of the initiative. The state would lose tens of million dollars in needed revenue.

 

Source: Seattle Times

By John Guadnola and Rick Hicks

Jun 3rd

 

As mandated by Initiative 1183, the state liquor stores and distribution center shut down for good on June 1, 2012. Unfortunately, that has not meant the end of needlessly divisive battles over our state’s liquor policies.

 

After spending more than $20 million to pass I-1183, Costco, in alliance with the restaurant industry and big grocery chains, is now attempting to rewrite the very rules it put in the initiative. The intent is to game the rules of the new system in a way that gives the big retailers an unfair competitive advantage over licensed distributors.

 

Costco and its surrogates are pushing legislation, 2SHB 1161, in the special session that would exempt retailers from paying the 17-percent fee required on retailer-to-restaurant sales. Creating a new tax break costing the state millions in revenue, at the same time the state is scrambling to find funding for tougher drunken-driving laws, makes no sense.

 

The proposed change would allow Costco to act as a liquor distributor, making unlimited sales to bars and restaurants, while exempting it from paying any of the $150 million in fees required of licensed distributors. This would not only unfairly tilt the competitive playing field, it would thwart the voters’ will and cost the state tens of millions in lost revenue.

 

I-1183 clearly states that retailers must pay the 17-percent fee on all their sales. Costco added this requirement to address the public’s concern that taxpayers could lose hundreds of millions in revenue by privatizing the liquor system. In combination with other fees and taxes, this retailer fee ensures taxpayers get more liquor revenue now than they did before privatization.

 

Now, Costco and its allies blame the Liquor Control Board for a fee Costco itself included in the initiative, and their proposed legislation eliminates the 17-percent fee on sales to restaurants. If big chains can make unlimited sales without paying the fee, the state loses revenue. But on most liquor brands, prices for restaurants would remain unchanged because suppliers have made it clear they prefer to go through a distributor rather than sell directly to retailers.

 

Washington’s spirits and wine distributors have been doing business here for many years, and with the imposition of new distributor fees their profit margins here are among the lowest in the country. Nonetheless, they are rooted in communities across the state and they are proud to have built good relationships with their employees.

 

Over the past 18 months they have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in creating a state-of-the-art private distribution system that reaches every corner of Washington, adding 1,000 well-paid jobs, many of them union jobs represented by the Teamsters. All of that will be put at risk if Costco has its way.

 

Backers of the Costco approach claim that a bipartisan group of legislators is supportive [“Repeal liquor fee for retailers to supply restaurants,” Opinion, May, 24]. They fail to mention that another bipartisan group of legislators strongly opposes the Costco approach, and instead favors a better alternative where distributors would voluntarily agree to pay more in fees in order to pay for a substantial tax cut for restaurants and other changes to warehousing and other rules to help smaller liquor retailers and independent grocers compete.

 

The Liquor Control Board is currently initiating a court-mandated small business economic study of the rules implementing I-1183. Legislators should slow down and allow this study to proceed.

 

With time and careful consideration, elected leaders in Olympia can come to an agreement that treats all market players fairly, rather than rushing through special-interest legislation that benefits one group at the expense of others and undermines the expressed will of the voters in the process.

 

John Guadnola is the executive director of the Association of Washington Spirits and Wine Distributors. Rick Hicks is president of Teamsters Joint Council 28.

 

 

——

United Kingdom: Alcohol is killing too many of us

 

It gets ever cheaper and now it’s linked to over a million hospital admissions a year. Minimum unit pricing would be a good start

 

Source: The Guardian

Kieran Moriarty 

Monday 3 June 2013

 

In 2011-12, there were over 1.2m alcohol-related hospital admissions in England, according to figures released last week – more than twice as many as a decade ago. There has been a 500% increase in deaths from liver cirrhosis, mainly due to alcohol, in the past 40 years.

 

Alcohol costs our country £25bn each year, due to its impact on health, crime and society, the workplace and the family. Alcohol exacerbates health and social inequalities. The most socially and economically deprived have up to 10 times greater alcohol-related mortality and admissions to hospital. Approximately a third of all A&E attendances are alcohol-related, reaching up to 80% at weekends. Something has to be done.

 

Traditionally, we associate alcohol-related harm with the middle-aged, and it is true that this age group, especially men, have the highest rates of liver disease. However, liver specialists are now caring for teenagers with cirrhosis, or life-threatening necrosis of the pancreas, after just five years of sustained, heavy binge drinking.

 

Young women are especially vulnerable, since they have less body water than men, resulting in higher blood alcohol concentrations for the same amount of alcohol drunk. I have seen five women in their 20s die from cirrhosis due to alcohol.

 

Alcohol misuse can lead to high blood pressure, strokes and cancers. Doctors are now caring for increasing numbers of young people in their 30s with permanent alcohol-related brain damage. Many of these people require long-term, supervised care, of which there is a major shortage.

 

So what has changed in the last decade to cause such a rapid increase in admissions? Availability of alcohol has multiplied far beyond the local pub – most is sold in off-licences and supermarkets, where it is often deeply discounted as a loss leader to entice customers into the store.

 

Alcohol is often much cheaper than bottled water. It is 45% more affordable than it was in 1980, hence it is the cheap, high-strength lager and cider in particular that is drunk in large quantities – especially by the most socioeconomically deprived, the very people we most need to protect. The government had intended to introduce minimum unit pricing for alcohol, but this now appears to be under threat.

 

The introduction of a 50p minimum unit price in England could bring a nearly 7% reduction in average alcohol consumption and prevent more than 3,000 alcohol-related deaths and 98,000 hospital admissions each year. In addition, it could reduce annual alcohol-related crimes by more than 40,000, including 10,500 violent crimes.

 

In British Columbia in Canada, a 10% increase in alcohol prices led to a 32% reduction in alcohol-related deaths and a 22% fall in the consumption of higher strength beers.

 

The minimum unit price works as it targets the problems caused by cheap, high-strength alcohol but does not adversely impact moderate drinkers, who would spend an average of just 28p extra per week. Its introduction is supported by the medical profession, the police, children’s charities and emergency services. Many parts of the global alcohol production industry are opposed.

 

David Cameron and the coalition committed to minimum pricing in March last year. However, the absence of this policy from last month’s Queen’s speech clearly reflects that corporate interests have got to other members of the cabinet. In 2010, the House of Commons health select committee concluded in its report on alcohol: “It is time the government listened more to the chief medical officer and the president of the Royal College of Physicians and less to the drinks and retail industry.”

 

And further action is needed. Currently, treatment services are not adequately equipped to cope with the nation’s alcohol problem. Only one in 18 dependent drinkers access treatment services per year, compared with one in two dependent drug users.

 

Specialist care can pull people back from the brink of the most devastating consequences of alcohol misuse, especially alcohol-related liver disease, give them back their self-respect and restore them to their families and communities. The development of high-quality, integrated prevention and treatment services for those with alcohol-related disease would be a wise investment for the future health of our nation, especially that of our young people.

Find Us Online

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Like Us On Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/franklinliquors

Follow Us On Twitter

http://www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

Need A Gift Idea For Dad??

Let Us Help!

Gift certificate

fine cigars

Liquor Industry News 6-3-13

June 3, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Monday June 3rd 2013

Biodynamic LEAF Morning BUT A FLOWER Night.

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine And Watch The Bruins

 

Beer: Nielsen C-Store Data Analysis: Beer Dollar Sales Continue to Decline (0.9% YoY) as Pricing Continues to Weigh on Volumes

 

Source: CITI

May 31st

 

Beer C-Store Dollar Sales Decline – In the four-week period ended May 11, 2013, c-store beer dollar sales fell 0.9% YoY (vs. -3.1% last period and +3.0% over the last 52 weeks) on a somewhat challenging YoY compare as dollar sales in the year-ago period were up 5.6%. The dollar sales decline was driven by a 3.5% decrease in volume sales (vs. -5.6% last period and -0.4% over the last 52 weeks) on a +2.3% comp, partially offset by a 2.6 pt contribution from price and mix (vs. +2.6 pts last period and +3.4 pts over the last 52 weeks). We note that across the major manufacturers, price gap management remains a key focus, as the companies that took less pricing than the category average largely posted outsized or improved volume growth.

 

MillerCoors Remains Challenged – TAP’s MillerCoors JV posted a 4.0% volume decline in the period (vs. -5.7% last period and -1.1% over the last 52 weeks), despite an easy comp as volume sales were down 0.7% in the year-ago period. As such, the company’s volume share was down 0.2 pts (after having been flat or up in each of the prior three months). Meanwhile, dollar sales were down 2.5% YoY (vs. -4.2% last period and +1.3% over the last 52 weeks), as the company saw a 1.5 pt benefit from price/mix (vs. 1.5 pts last period and 2.4 pts over the last 52 weeks).

 

Crown Imports Continues to Outperform – STZ’s Crown Imports JV continued its relative outperformance, posting dollar sales growth of 11.9% YoY (vs. +8.7% last period and +12.6% over the last 52 weeks). Volumes were the key driver once again, +12.1% in thee period (vs. +7.3% last period and +11.8% over the last 52 weeks), as Crown saw a modest 0.3 pt drag from price/mix (vs. a 1.4 pt benefit last period and a 0.8 pt benefit over the last 52 weeks). Going forward, we’ll continue to monitor the margins for the Crown Imports business (as we believe growth is primarily being driven by the lower-priced Modelo Especial brand), as well as the company’s price gap management (given our belief that Crown’s falling price gap has been a key driver of market share gains).

 

Boston Beer’s Growth Continues to Accelerate – SAM saw its dollar sales accelerate for the second consecutive period, to +14.0% YoY (vs. +10.3% last period and +14.9% over the last 52 weeks). The company’s dollar sales growth in the period was driven almost entirely by a 13.9% YoY increase in volumes (vs. +9.6% last period and +13.0% over the last 52 weeks), as price/mix acted as a 0.1 pt benefit (vs. 0.7 pts last period and 1.9 pts over the last 52 weeks). Looking ahead, SAM will continue to face challenging dollar sales growth and volume sales growth comps (in the HSD to LDD range) over the remainder of 2013, such that we will be interested to see whether the company can maintain low-double-digit growth.

 

 

——

Nielsen C-store: MNST slows partly on tough comp; TAP still soft

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

May 31st

 

Energy drink category slows to +4.3%; MNST ekes out small share gain

Nielsen convenience store data for the four weeks ended 5/11/13 showed energy drink category sales up 4.3%, a deceleration from 8.9% last period. This was predominantly volume based as price/mix was +0.3% in the month. MNST’s sales growth also slowed, with +5.1% this month versus +10.1% last month. Comps for the category and MNST were tougher this period than last month, but the data was still softer than expected. Recall also that MNST indicated that its sales growth in Nielsen c-store data for the 4-weeks ending 4/27/13 was +6.5%. July comp remains tough at 28% but we still expect MNST’s sales growth to accelerate to double-digits in the back-half of the year as comparisons ease. Red Bull remained the primary share gainer but saw its sales slow to +9.7% from +16.6% last month. Rockstar remained a significant share donor with sales down 3.8%.

 

Beer category still off to a tough start in 2013, but sales improve from last month due to an easier compare

Beer sales were down 0.9% which was an improvement from -3.1% last month, although it appears all of that was due to an easier comparison (+5.6% last year this month vs. +8.2% the prior month). Price/mix remains solid at +2.6% this month, but volumes have been weak and have averaged -2.8% year to date. We continue to see a bi-furcation in growth with premium and sub-premium sales down 4-6% while above premium grows MSD-HSD.

 

TAP sales decline 2.5% as mainstream beer still struggling

It’s been a tough start to 2013 for mainstream beer as TAP and ABI portfolios were down 4% and 4.9%, respectively, in this period. The two big companies continue to take 1-2% pricing while the above premium pricing has remained flat for the most part. Tough compares, the payroll tax impact, poor weather and divergent pricing with the high end all appear to be making for a challenging 2013 so far for TAP and ABI.

 

High end beer continues growth momentum

Both Crown Imports and SAM had their beer portfolio sales up double digits this month with Crown +11.9% and SAM +14%. Each had no price/mix in the period. Both are an acceleration over last month, but are both exactly in line with their 52wk growth rate.

 

 

——

Constellation and Crown Mull Craft Investments

 

Source: Brewbound

by Max Rothman

May 31st

Following the agreement between Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI) and the U.S. Department of Justice, as the dust settled and the components were parceled, Constellation Brands secured a coup of its own.

 

While ABI bought the stake in Grupo Modelo that it didn’t already own for $20.1 billion, Constellation bought the 50 percent of Modelo brands sold in the U.S. by Crown Imports, a leading importer of Corona, that it didn’t already own for $2.9 billion. This also gave Constellation the rights to Modelo’s brewery in Piedras Negras, Mexico.

 

This coup shifted the landscape for Constellation and its subsidiary and venture partner, Crown, enabling the companies to explore and possibly invest in the still-growing craft beer industry.

 

“It opens the horizon,” Crown president Bill Hackett said of the agreement. “We are completely unshackled.”

 

Right on cue, less than one week after the settlement, Jeff Menashe, CEO of the Demeter Group, a San Francisco-based investment bank, assembled a presentation for Constellation titled Why Craft Beer is Next. The presentation explained how the Modelo deal could transform Constellation’s future and lead the company and its investors toward craft beer.

 

Menashe believes that investors have reached a greater level of comfort with the craft beer industry because it’s further proven itself in the marketplace by displaying consistent years of growth.

 

“Craft has become big enough and it’s not looking as though there’s any reason for it to sort of fall from that position,” Menashe said.

 

The presentation noted that over the past year, Constellation’s 123 wine brands and seven spirits brands pulled in $2.8 billion in revenue, while Crown’s four beer brands, highlighted by Corona, pulled in $2.6 billion. This imbalance explains the power of beer’s revenue and the potential need for more beer brands. The presentation also noted that unlike the craft beer industry, the current depth of the wine market leaves little space for growth. Menashe doesn’t see any extra space for premium glass, super premium and ultra premium wine brands.

 

Yet despite their divergent growth rates, Menashe mentioned several similarities between the two segments; both come at a premium price, appeal to millennials, focus on style and depend on a back story. This story can talk about the ingredients, the geographical association or the brand personality, but no matter the details, it steadily aims to give the brand a human dimension.

 

As wine’s growth subsides and craft beer’s growth continues to increase, the similarities between these segments could smooth Constellation’s transition to craft beer, according to Menashe.

 

“I think that the craft and those wine brands I’m referring to are tracking or are trying to speak to the same consumer,” he said.

 

Hackett said that he’s constantly talking with craft brands, and while he hasn’t yet struck a deal, he envisions significant moves in the near future. He also said that Crown’s 15 warehouses across the country and advanced distribution system will allow whatever brand it picks up to reach the right markets at a quick rate.

 

“I think we’re just on the cusp of expanding our business,” Hackett said.

 

 

——

Edrington Group trials flavoured Famous Grouse variants (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just-Drinks

By Ian Buxton

31 May 2013

 

The Edrington Group has completed what it describes as a “research exercise” with flavoured variants of The Famous Grouse blended Scotch whisky.

 

The Famous Grouse Citrus, Vanilla and Spice were tested in 1 litre packages at 35% abv through Swedish retailer Scanbolaget.com, retailing at SEK206 (US$ 31.16), just-drinks understands.

 

 

——

Coming soon? Nutritional labels on alcohol (Additional Coverage)

 

Source: USA Today

Mary Clare Jalonick

June 1, 2013

 

Alcohol beverages soon could have nutritional labels like those on food packaging, but only if the producers want to put them there.

 

The Treasury Department, which regulates alcohol, said this past week that beer, wine and spirits companies can use labels that include serving size, servings per container, calories, carbohydrates, protein and fat per serving. Such package labels have never before been approved.

 

The labels are voluntary, so it will be up to beverage companies to decide whether to use them on their products.

 

The decision is a temporary, first step while the Alcohol and Tobacco Trade and Tax Bureau (TTB) continues to consider final rules on alcohol labels. Rules proposed in 2007 would have made labels mandatory, but the agency never made the rules final.

 

The labeling regulation, issued May 28, comes after a decade of lobbying by hard liquor companies and consumer groups, with clearly different goals.

 

The liquor companies want to advertise low calories and low carbohydrates in their products. Consumer groups want alcoholic drinks to have the same transparency as packaged foods, which are required to be labeled.

 

“This is actually bringing alcoholic beverages into the modern era,” says Guy Smith, an executive vice president at Diageo, the world’s largest distiller and maker of such well-known brands as Johnnie Walker, Smirnoff, Jose Cuervo and Tanqueray.

 

Diageo asked the bureau in 2003 to allow the company to add that information to its products as low-carbohydrate diets were gaining in popularity.

 

Almost 10 years later, Smith said he expects Diageo gradually to put the new labels on all of its products, which include a small number of beer and wine companies.

 

“It’s something consumers have come to expect,” Smith said. “In time, it’s going to be, why isn’t it there?”

 

Not all alcohol companies are expected to use labels. Among those that may take a pass are beer companies, which don’t want consumers counting calories, and winemakers, which don’t want to ruin the sleek look of their bottles.

 

The Wine Institute, which represents more than a thousand California wineries, said in a statement that it supports the ruling but “experience suggests that such information is not a key factor in consumer purchase decisions about wine.”

 

Spokeswoman Gladys Horiuchi said the group knows of no wine companies that plan to use the new labels.

 

The beer industry praised the agency for acknowledging that labels should take into account variations in the concentration of alcohol content in different products.

 

The industry has opposed the idea of defining serving size by fluid ounces of pure alcohol – or as 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine or 1.5 ounces of 80-proof liquor – on the grounds that you may get more than 1.5 ounces of liquor in a cocktail depending on what else is in the drink and the accuracy of the bartender.

 

The ruling would allow the labels to declare alcohol content as a percentage of alcohol by volume, the approach favored by the beer industry.

 

“We applaud the TTB’s conclusion that rules be based on how drinks are actually served and consumed,” said Joe McClain, president of the Beer Institute.

 

McClain said the beer industry is pleased that the ruling provides “substantial flexibility” in terms of the format and placement of the disclosure on packaging.

 

It is unclear whether beer companies will actually use the labels, however.

 

Consumer advocates criticized the regulation.

 

“It doesn’t reflect any concern about public health,” said Michael Jacobson, director of the Center for Science in the Public Interest. He said the rules are too close to what the alcohol companies had sought.

 

Consumer advocates have said that listing alcohol content should be mandatory so consumers know how much they are drinking. Jacobson and others also support having calorie counts on labels, but they said the labels should not include nutrients that make the alcohol seem more like a food.

 

“Including fat and carbohydrates on a label could imply that an alcoholic beverage is positively healthful, especially when the drink’s alcohol content isn’t prominently labeled,” Jacobson said.

 

Current labeling law is complicated.

 

Wines containing 14% or more alcohol by volume must list alcohol content. Wines that are 7% to 14% alcohol by volume may list alcohol content or put “light” or “table” wine on the label. “Light” beers must list calorie and carbohydrate content only. Liquor must list alcohol content by volume and may also list proof, a measure of alcoholic strength.

 

Wine, beer and liquor manufacturers don’t have to list ingredients but must list substances people might be sensitive to, such as sulfites, certain food colorings and aspartame.

 

Tom Hogue of the TTB said the aim of the ruling is to make sure alcohol labeling is more consistent. “The idea here is we are trying to make it easy for the industry to communicate this with consumers if they want to do so, and if their consumers want them to do it,” he said.

 

 

——

United Breweries net profit falls 19.6% in March quarter

 

United Breweries reports a 7% increase in sales, helped by higher demand for its Kingfisher beer

 

Source: Livemint

Mihir Dalal

Thu, May 30 2013

 

United Breweries Ltd (UBL), the beer-making business of Vijay Mallya’s UB group, reported a 7% increase in sales to Rs.1,003.62 crore for the March quarter, helped by higher demand for its Kingfisher beer.

Net profit for the quarter ended 31 March fell 19.6% to Rs.5.85 crore, but the company said that results of the two periods are not directly comparable as some UB businesses were merged into UBL in the 2011-2012 financial year.

 

UBL has led the rebound in beer sales in India after high prices hurt demand in the year ended March 2012. In the last financial year, most brewers including SABMiller and Carlsberg reported strong numbers helped by demand for strong brews-beer with alcohol content of over 5%.

 

UBL shares fell 1.67% to Rs.736 on Thursday on the BSE. The benchmark index rose 0.34% to 20,215.40 points. The results were announced after market hours.

 

“The fourth-quarter results are not comparable but the full-year Ebitda (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and ammortization) margins got a boost from lower bottling costs. They have made investments in bottling and it’s paying off,” said Sunita Sachdev, analyst at UBS Securities.

 

Over the past few years, UBL has been investing on patenting its bottles, which helps the company control bottling costs since only UB can reuse them.

 

 

——

US consumers cut spending 0.2 percent in April after income fails to grow

 

Source: Washington Post

By Associated Press

Published: May 31

 

Americans cut back on spending in April after their income failed to grow, a sign that economic growth may be slowing.

 

Consumer spending dropped a seasonally adjusted 0.2 percent in April, the Commerce Department said Friday. That was the first decline since last May. It followed a 0.1 percent increase in March and a 0.8 percent jump in February.

 

A drop in gas prices likely lowered overall spending. Adjusted for inflation, spending ticked up 0.1 percent last month. Still, that was the smallest gain since October.

 

Consumers also likely spent less to heat their homes last month, which may have reduced spending on utilities. April’s weather was mild after an unusually cold March.

 

Income was unchanged last month, after a 0.3 percent rise in March and 1.2 percent gain in February. Wages and salaries barely grew, while government benefit payments fell.

 

The retrenchment in spending indicates consumers may be starting to feel the impact of higher taxes. But a separate report Friday showed consumer confidence rose to a six-year high in May, suggesting the decline in spending may be temporary.

 

Americans are taking home less pay this year because of a 2 percentage point increase in Social Security taxes. A person earning $50,000 a year has about $1,000 less to spend this year. A household with two high-paid workers has up to $4,500 less.

 

Income taxes on the wealthiest Americans also increased.

 

Consumer spending drives 70 percent of economic activity. It grew at the fastest pace in more than two years from January through March, helping the economy expand at a 2.4 annual rate during that quarter.

 

Economists said the latest spending figures suggest growth may be slowing in the April-June quarter to around a 2 percent rate. But most still expect growth to improve slightly after that as the impact of tax hikes and government spending cuts fades.

 

“Overall, a sobering report for those expecting … growth to accelerate sharply,” said Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics. “There will be some modest pickup in the second half of the year, as the fiscal drag starts to ease, but we expect the improvement to be very gradual rather than dramatic.”

 

Slower growth could lead the Federal Reserve to delay any scaling back in its bond purchases, which are keeping borrowing costs low.

 

Investors had been speculating that the Fed would start to slow its purchases in the next few months. That’s led to a spike in Treasury yields and higher interest rates.

 

Low inflation could also lead the Fed to continue its bond purchases.

 

The Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, which is updated as part of the consumer spending report, showed that prices fell 0.3 percent in April and increased just 0.7 percent in the past 12 months.

 

Still, economists say the Fed’s stimulus is most tied to the health of the job market, which has improved in recent months.

 

Employers have added an average of 208,000 jobs a month since November. That’s well above the monthly average of 138,000 during the previous six months.

 

Greater hiring is among several trends that could partly offset the impact of the tax increases and revive spending later this year.

 

Consumer confidence surged in April to a five-year high, according to the Conference Board, as Americans’ outlook on the job market improved. And on Friday, the University of Michigan’s survey showed consumer sentiment rose this month to its highest level since July 2007.

 

Home prices have surged 11 percent over the past year. Rising home tend to make homeowners feel wealthier and more likely to shop. Some economists estimate that for every dollar increase in home values, consumer spending can rise as much as 10 cents.

 

 

——

Wells Fargo’s Weekly Economic & Financial Commentary

 

Source: Wells Fargo

May 31st

 

U.S.

.         Consumer confidence is at its highest level since the recession, spurred by negligible inflation, a stronger stock market, and continued job growth.

.         However, consumer spending pulled back slightly in April.

.         1Q13 GDP was revised lower, with reductions in government spending subtracting more from headline growth than originally estimated.

.         Consumer spending and business investment were both stronger than initially reported, suggesting ongoing economic expansion.

.         The newest data supports the thesis of a recovering housing market, as both home prices and pending home sales moved higher.

 

International

.         Switzerland and Sweden surprised economists with stronger than expected 1Q13 GDP results.

.         Unfortunately, fixed business investment declined and businesses remain cautious regarding the Eurozone’s economic outlook.

.         While Brazil’s economy continues to struggle, inflation concerns have forced the central bank to increase the policy rate.

.         India’s economic growth has slowed, as the country struggles to generate growth without substantial inflation.

.         Despite expansionary efforts by the BOJ, inflation remains below 1.0% in Japan.

.         However, the economy does seem to be responding, as industrial production in April was stronger than expected.

 

 

——

Handbag war escalates as LVMH accuses Hermès of ‘smear campaign’

 

Source: FT

By Scheherazade Daneshkhu in Paris

May 31st

 

LVMH accused Hermès of waging a relentless “smear campaign” against the world’s largest luxury goods group by sales on Friday, as the handbag war between two of France’s most well-known companies intensified during a public hearing.

 

LVMH, which is headed by Bernard Arnault, France’s richest man, asked for the stock exchange investigation into its 2010 build-up of a 17 per cent stake in Hermès to be nullified, claiming there had been procedural irregularities that did not allow it to mount a fair defence.

 

“The procedure should be dismissed?.?.?.?There are serious violations to the presumption of innocence, in the impartiality of investigators,” Georges Terrier, LVMH’s lawyer, said at Friday’s public hearing by the regulator’s sanctions committee.

 

He was flanked by Pierre Godé, Mr Arnault’s right-hand man and LVMH’s deputy chairman. “We have the greatest respect for the house of Hermès. But its managers have for more than two years led a smear campaign against LVMH and slander that is very detrimental to the image and reputation of LVMH,” Mr Godé said. Hermès denies the allegations.

 

Hermès, which is family controlled but publicly quoted, views LVMH’s stakebuilding as an “attack”. LVMH used equity swaps to amass a 17 per cent stake, which it announced suddenly in October 2010, saying its intentions were friendly.

 

The Autorité des Marchés Financiers, the regulator, dismissed LVMH’s allegations, saying its inquiry had been “scrupulously conducted”. It also said that the lack of transparency was so serious that it called for the maximum ?10m fine against LVMH.

 

The inquiry had found that LVMH violated stock exchange rules on disclosure, a finding the sanctions committee – an independent body – will decide whether to uphold and whether to impose financial penalties.

 

It is the first time that LVMH has been accused of stock market violations. According to the conclusions of the watchdog’s inquiry, the luxury goods group should have declared its speculation on Hermès shares four months earlier than its October 2010 statement.

 

The markets watchdog also alleges that LVMH planned a financial operation against Hermès, which could have affected Hermès’ share price.

 

For its part, LVMH accused the AMF of having shifted the parameters of its inquiry and preventing the luxury company from seeing documents that it said were crucial to its defence.

 

The sanctions committee will give its decision this summer. But whatever the regulatory outcome, the bitter fight between the maker of Louis Vuitton bags and Hermès, creator of the Kelly and Birkin bags, is set to continue in the courts, where Hermès has lodged a separate legal complaint against LVMH.

 

In the complaint, which is being examined by investigating magistrates, Hermès alleges insider trading and manipulation of its share price against LVMH. A counter-complaint has been filed by LVMH for “slander, blackmail and unfair competition”.

 

Patrick Thomas, chief executive of Hermès, has said the silk scarves group wants LVMH to reduce its shareholding or sell out altogether in order to expand the company’s free float – currently less than 5 per cent.

 

The Hermès family owns 72 per cent of the shares and is largely protected from a hostile takeover through its limited partnership structure. Nevertheless, Hermès family members last year took a belt and braces approach to ensure their control, by setting up a holding company that gives family members first right of refusal on share sales.

 

 

——

Large selection boosts wine sales

 

Source: ID Report

May 31st

 

Operators that offer a larger selection of wine brands sell more wine, especially at bars. So found a survey of 2,000 U.S. drinkers over the age of 21, reported by Alcoholic Beverage Demand/Tracker.

 

. Among drinkers who visit restaurants regularly, 31% say they are more likely to drink wine and 23% would order more glasses of wine as a result of being offered a larger selection of wine brands

 

. With more choices, 26% of wine drinkers are more likely to experiment by ordering wine brands they never tried before

 

. Among wine drinkers who visit bars regularly, 38% say they are more likely to drink wine and 31% will order more servings of wine with a wider selection of brands

 

. Only 25% of wine drinkers who visit bars say that a larger selection of brands has no effect on their consumption

 

“Our latest findings confirm the value for on-premise operators to offer a large selection of wine,” said David Decker, president of Consumer Edge Insight, the company that conducted the survey. “For those who enjoy wine, seeing a larger selection of brands at a bar or restaurant is an invitation to consume and experiment.”

 

 

——

Bon Pasteur sold to Goldin Group of Hong Kong

 

Source: Decanter

by Adam Lechmere

Friday 31 May 2013

 

Michel Rolland’s Chateau Le Bon Pasteur in Pomerol and its two sister properties have been sold to the Goldin Group of Hong Kong.

 

The sale, which was decided in December last year but has taken some months to finalise, has just been announced by Vignobles Rolland, the owner of the properties.

 

The CEO of the Goldin Group is Sutong Pan, whose biography details his ‘profound experience infinance and property development [and the] manufacturing of advanced electronicproducts in China, Hong Kong and the United States.

 

Pan Sutong ‘is passionate about wine, well connected in Bordeaux wine circles, and ready to make every effort to valorize the wines, and the name, and to perpetuate the history in accordance with family tradition,’ Rolland Vignobles said.

 

The current technical team will remain in place under the direction of Michel and Dany Rolland, it added.

 

Goldin is also the owner of cult Rutherford, Napa property Sloan Estate, which it bought in 2011 for areported US$40m. Michel Rolland is its consultant.

 

The Bon Pasteur dealincludes two other Rolland estates, Chateau Rolland-Maillet in St Emilion and Chateau Bertineau St Vincent in Lalande-de-Pomerol. The properties’ vineyards amount to some 16ha.

 

 

——

Heavy rains across Europe delay growth ‘by three weeks’

 

Source: Decanter

by Panos Kakaviatos and Jane Anson in Burgundy

Friday 31 May 2013

The heavy rains that have been falling across France and much of Europe for the past few weeks have halted vine growth in many regions, jeopardising flowering at a crucial time of the year.

 

Trouble ahead…clouds over Clos des Lambrays in the Côte de Nuits [pic: Panos Kakaviatos]

 

In Burgundy, almost 400mm of rain has fallen since 27 April on the Cote d’Or – more than double the average. Growers say that the harvest is unlikely to begin before October, which will be three to four weeks late.

 

Surveying the Domaine Marquis d’Angerville Clos des Ducs vineyard in Volnay, owner Guillaume d’Angerville pointed out the noisy and constant flow of water draining from the celebrated vineyard: ‘We’ve only had five days without rain in the last 30 days,’ he said.

 

Over in Beaune, Frederic Barnier, winemaking director of Louis Jadot, pointed to clouds in the sky on 28 May: ‘This is typical, about two hours of sun, and then the rain comes back – we have had more than double normal rainfall since January, and what worries me most is the lack of sun.’

 

Flowering has been delayed and vineyard treatments such as ploughing that would normally have been completed by now have been difficult due to muddy vineyards..

 

Vintners have resorted to ’19th century methods’ of applying preventive anti-mildew treatments by hand-spray, said Frederic Mugnier of Jacques Frederic Mugnier in Chambolle Musigny.

 

Although abnormally low temperatures have minimized the risk of the spread of mildiou and oidium, winemakers worry that an imminent rise in temperatures will result in disease.

 

‘Up to 10 degrees C, mildew will not develop, but temperatures have been close to passing that border,’ Mugnier said.

 

Vintners are facing similar problems in the rest of France. In Bordeaux, new plantings are being put on hold. ‘Everything is behind schedule,’ said Peng Wang of Chateau de Pic in Cotes de Cadillac. Champagne is on high alert for frost risk, while Loire winemakers are reporting rapid spread of vegetation and weeds.

 

Problems are not just limited to France. Axel Heinz of Ornellaia, speaking at a tasting of his wines in Bordeaux last week, said that Tuscany has also had a cold spring, and the vines are about two weeks behind their usual stage at the end of May.

 

 

——

Chile Concha Y Toro 1st-Quarter Net Increases 0.3% To CLP5.25 Billion

 

Source: Dow Jones

May 31st

 

Vina Concha y Toro SA (VCO, CONCHATOR.SN) posted 5.25 billion Chilean pesos ($10.6 million) in first-quarter net profit, an increase of 0.3% from the same period last year, the Chilean wine maker said late Thursday.

 

In the first quarter, export sales increased less than expected as the winemaker couldn’t ship part of its production in March due to labor strikes at several Chilean ports.

 

Revenue for the quarter rose 2.5% year-on-year to CLP91.08 billion, the company said in a statement.

 

Concha y Toro, one of the world’s biggest wine exporters, has been focusing on premium wines to offset a stronger peso and rising production costs.

 

 

——

Bubbling under

 

Source: FT

By Jancis Robinson

May 31st

 

Growers’ champagnes consistently offer so much better value than the heavily marketed grandes marques

 

Is champagne a wine or a brand? This question preoccupied me as I tasted the offerings of five grape growers from the Champagne region in the cellars of Justerini & Brooks in St James’s Street, London. In the heart of clubland, a stone’s throw from Hedgie Central, you can imagine easily, I’m sure, Justerini’s client base and the sort of customers I was tasting with. These champagnes were without a shadow of a doubt wines – each one eloquently individual, the expression of particular growing seasons, personal winemaking philosophies and techniques, different villages and even different plots within the Champagne vignoble. Even the best-known name of the five, Egly Ouriet, enjoys nothing like the brand recognition of one of the grandes marques.

 

Justerini’s prices for these gems range from just £21.58 a bottle, for Forget-Brimont’s bargain non-vintage blend from Premier Cru vineyards, to £82.97 for Egly Ouriet’s magnificent 2002 vintage champagne from Grand Cru vineyards. These growers’ champagnes consistently offer so much better value than the heavily marketed grandes marques that I applaud Justerini’s buyers for taking notice of their increasing importance in the world of wine. But I suspect they may be a tough sell to some of their customers, accustomed as they are to the security of a well-known brand.

 

There are about 20 well-known grandes marques, robustly priced champagnes made in such quantity that they have to blend dozens and often hundreds of ingredients to produce a consistent style. When you serve your guests one of these, they know they are being treated to something with a certain price tag and reputation. But only wine nuts know their Larmandier-Bernier (one of my favourite champagne growers) from their Laurent Perrier (one of the grandes marques). In some circles it would take a certain confidence to serve champagne from a little-known grower, however good, especially since from a distance it can be so difficult to tell a lovingly crafted grower’s champagne from a cheap, mass-market buyer’s own brand.

 

The key is to look at the pair of initials in small print on the label. Growers’ champagnes are denoted “RM” for récoltant-manipulant. A buyer’s own brand is marked “MA” for marque d’acheteur, while someone who buys in wine to make their champagne, as all the grandes marques do, is an “NM” for négociant-manipulant. A co-op wine is marked “CM” for coopérative de manipulation. Checking this at a party would take extremely good eyesight and a certain amount of impudence.

 

I have long thought it odd that the big champagne producers have adapted so little to the increasing sophistication and curiosity of wine-drinkers. I have sought, largely in vain, to learn which years their non-vintage blends are based on, or how long the blend has been in contact with the character-forming sediment from the second fermentation in the bottle and, ideally, when the champagne was separated from it (an operation known as disgorgement). Most grandes marques leave their customers entirely in the dark about this sort of nerdy detail. And of course it is even more infuriating to me that such champagne continues to sell so well despite their brand owners treating their non-vintage blends as though they were branded fizzy drinks – which of course they are, even if rather more expensive than the average cola.

 

Good growers, bless them, are far more likely to deliver such facts on a plate – or at least on back labels. The likes of Bérèche et Fils, Chartogne-Taillet and Pascal Doquet are all excellent at telling their customers which vintages and grapes are in the blend. Egly Ouriet prints exactly how many months the wine was in contact with the lees (106 in the case of that 2002) and when it was disgorged. Isabelle Diebolt of Diebolt-Vallois explained to me, chez Justerini, that they are quite happy to supply informative back labels if their importers ask for them. Justerini’s don’t. The Swedish monopoly insists on them. Please, importers, ask for max facts. Your customers can always ignore them if they are not interested.

 

The most energetic importers of grower champagnes I know are Terry Theise in Washington DC and Vine Trail of Bristol. Terry almost single-handedly ignited American sommeliers’ love affair with these terroir- and vintage-driven wines, while Nick Brookes of Vine Trail can claim to have done the same, a little later, in the UK. The guests at Vine Trail’s recent grower champagne tasting were quite different from the St James’s crowd. Young, casually dressed restaurant staff made up the majority and were clearly set to order enough to warrant a personal appearance from most of the 13 growers whose wines (no, not brands) were on show.

 

There was such individuality evident in this selection, it was thrilling. I didn’t enjoy every single wine but I truly appreciated them – for the individual story each had to tell. They really did taste like quite different drinks from grande marque champagne (which is sometimes exquisite but too often dull and overpriced). Many of Vine Trail’s champagnes are Extra Brut or even Brut Nature with much less added sugar than most champagnes, yet most taste beautifully balanced rather than searingly tart.

 

There are more than 4,650 champagne growers making and selling their own champagne. Some of it is dismal. I should stress that I am not advocating all grower champagne; it has to have been handpicked by someone like Theise, Brookes, Justerini’s or The Sampler in London. Nick Brookes’ last foray in search of new growers to add to the Vine Trail portfolio involved auditioning 41 potential suppliers, of which he chose a single one. Anyone with an intimate knowledge of champagne drinking in France will understand.

 

But if you are seriously interested in wine, as opposed to brands, you ignore this segment of Champagne producers at your peril. As Isabelle Diebolt put it, “these wines are for people looking for something different, something determined by terroir. We look for it in cheese, in coffee, in chocolate. Why not champagne?”

 

 

——

Not Just for Fondue: The Fresh Whites of Savoie

 

The French region is known for its cheeses, but its wines are more obscure. That could change as more people try Savoie’s light, refreshing, affordable white wines, says Lettie Teague.

 

Source: WSJ

By LETTIE TEAGUE

May 31st

 

THE CONNECTION between wine and cheese has been well documented. There are books and seminars and even educational videos explaining the closeness of their relationship. And while the two are often produced in the same places, they’re particularly tight in the Savoie region of France.

 

Located in the picturesque, pricey French Alps, Savoie is home to famous cheeses like Reblochon and Tomme de Savoie, and has even been called the birthplace of fondue. The reputation of its wines, however, is a bit more obscure. Made with grapes such as the unfamiliar Jacquère and Gringet, the wines of Savoie are little-known and can be quite hard to find. But thanks to an appealing combination of high quality and low price, that may soon change.

 

I first tasted a Savoie wine almost 12 years ago, at Artisanal Bistro, the cheese-centric New York restaurant. The wine was the Pierre Boniface Apremont Vin de Savoie, and although that was long ago, I still remember how well it went with my croque monsieur-its bright acidity offering a bracing contrast to the richness of the ham and the cheese. And it was cheap: The retail price was between $10 and $12 a bottle. I saw the Boniface many times over the years, but I never found any more wines from Savoie-and eventually, I stopped looking for them.

 

Then about a year and a half ago, Joe Salamone, a wine buyer at Crush Wine & Spirits in New York, mentioned that he had some particularly good Savoie whites. I bought the bottles he recommended and found them just as good as, if not better than, the Boniface Apremont. They were not only crisp and refreshing but also intensely minerally; some even had a Chablis-like flintiness as well. Others were more opulent and rich, but they were all quite reasonably priced-generally around $20 a bottle.

 

Most of the wines were made from the Jacquère grape, a rather obscure varietal everywhere else in world but common and popular in Savoie. Wines made from Jacquère are quite dry and rather light-bodied, with a Sancerre-style acidity and delicate floral aromas. They’re perfect wines for summer, though in Savoie they’re often consumed après-ski with melted cheese.

 

Some Savoie whites are richer and more viscous; these are the wines made from the Altesse grape, another Savoie-specific varietal, which tastes a bit like a cross between Chardonnay and Roussanne (yet another grape grown in Savoie). In fact, Altesse is frequently blended with Chardonnay in both still and sparkling Savoie wines.

 

There are other grapes grown in Savoie, too, most notably Gringet (a high-acid white said to be related to a grape from Jura, in eastern France) and Mondeuse blanche and noire (the latter is a bit like Syrah), as well as a few others that are yet more obscure.

 

Many of these grapes have alternate names. That’s another hallmark of Savoie wines-in addition to their affinity for cheese, they come with quite a few aliases. For example, Altesse is also known as Anet, Fusette d’Ambérieu and Prin Blanc, while Jacquère’s alternate monikers are Martin-Cot and Cugnette.

 

Jacquère is grown to particularly good effect in Apremont, which means “after the mountain.” Apremont is probably the best-known town in Savoie, as there are quite a few producers based there. In fact, Apremont shows up so often on labels that non-Savoie-savvy drinkers might be excused for thinking it, too, was a grape.

 

There are other well-known Savoie towns, most notably Chignin, where Jacquère is grown; and Frangy, where Roussette (aka Altesse) is grown. Of course, “well-known” is a relative concept when it comes to Savoie. There aren’t many wine drinkers who really know the wines-at least, not yet. According to Mulan Chan-Randel, who buys Savoie wines for K&L Wine Merchants in California, almost all of their Savoie sales are “hand sells” in the store. There are almost no Internet buyers-that is, very few are seeking the wines out. In fact, the only time that customers actually request a Savoie wine is “when they’re making fondue,” said Ms. Chan.

 

Savoie wine importer Russell Herman said that he sometimes describes Savoie as “the upper Rhône Valley,” and that seems to help orient people geographically. Mr. Herman has been importing the wines of Savoie producer Eugène Carrel for six years. The wines have sold well, according to Mr. Herman, who attributes part of their success to a “general movement toward high-elevation whites, with lower alcohol levels, that are fresh and light.”

 

In fact, those last two words were key to my decision to organize tastings of 20 or so Savoie wines recently. “Fresh” and “light” are the defining words of a summer wine, after all. Most of the wines that I bought were made from the Jacquère grape, although I had some Altesse and Gringet wines and a couple of sparkling wines as well. Most cost around $20 a bottle, although a couple cost as much as $44.

 

I tasted the wines alone and with food (including cheese, of course) and tasted them all with friends, none of whom had ever had encountered wines from the region. This last fact was particularly striking, as some of my friends are serious collectors who buy and drink wines from all over the world.

 

But their enthusiasm was nearly as vast as their ignorance. “This is clean like a whistle,” said my friend Sue approvingly of the crisp 2010 Domaine Giachino Apremont. “It’s exactly the kind of low-alcohol wine that I love,” she added, looking at the 11.5% alcohol number on the label of a bottle of 2010. “It’s tingly,” said another friend of the minerally 2011 Domaine Belluard Les Alpes, one of the two wines made from the Gringet grape in the tasting. (The other, also made by Domaine Belluard, was Le Feu, a single-vineyard wine made from the estate’s oldest vines that was even more impressive. At $41, it cost about $12 more than the Les Alpes.)

 

There were very few disappointments among the various bottles-a rare occurrence in any tasting. Even the Pierre Boniface, a wine I hadn’t tasted in years, was still good, if a bit simple compared with some of the others. My friends were also quite pleased by the prices (the 2012 Eugène Carrel Roussette de Savoie, at $18, was deemed a steal). In fact, the only dissenter was a wine collector who seemed alarmed to find that he liked so cheap a wine.

 

A few days later, I decided to check out the Artisanal wine list; there were probably quite a few Savoie wines on it by now. But there were none: Even the Pierre Boniface was gone. What happened? I asked Artisanal’s wine director, Brian Mitchell (who recalled the Boniface favorably from his years in retail). Mr. Mitchell replied that he simply preferred other wines; for example, with the fondue he was featuring a Swiss wine made from the Chasselas grape. Although disappointed, I understood; the Swiss know how to pair wine with cheese, too.

 

 

——

Billionaire buys the neighbour’s chateau

 

Source: Timaru Herald

ALEX FENSOME

01/06/2013

Wine-loving American billionaire Bill Foley has opened his chequebook again to buy a $1.85 million chateau next door to his luxury lodge south of Featherston.

 

Mr Foley, owner of the exclusive Wharekauhau Country Estate, near Lake Wairarapa, received Overseas Investment Office approval in April to buy the house.

 

The OIO announced its decision yesterday. Mr Foley, who is worth more than $1.5 billion, intends to use the house, Chateau Wellington, as his home when he is in the country.

 

He manages a Kiwi wine empire from Te Kairanga winery in Martinborough, which he bought in 2011.

 

The 430-square-metre chateau includes three bedrooms with luxurious en suites, an outdoor swimming pool and sweeping views of Palliser Bay.

 

Its extensive open grounds allow easy access for helicopters to fly guests in from Wellington.

 

When he is not in residence, Mr Foley intends to offer it as additional luxury accommodation for Wharekauhau.

 

He began buying vineyards in Wairarapa and Marlborough in 2009, and his holding company, Foley Family Wines, controls brands including Vavasour, Dashwood, Redwood Pass, Boatshed Bay, Goldwater and Clifford Bay.

 

He has extensive interests in the American wine industry and owns numerous vineyards in California and Washington State, while remaining chairman of the insurance firm Fidelity National Financial, a Fortune 500 company.

 

 

——

China: Call for cheaper wine as economy slows

 

Source: China Daily

By Tang Zhihao in Shanghai and Zhou Siyu in Beijing

June 3, 2013

 

The wine industry in China is paying more attention to less expensive brands as an increasing number of Chinese people seek more affordable imported bottles to enjoy socially rather than for business purposes.

 

The figures from Wine Intelligence, a London-based consulting firm specializing in the wine business, show that in the first quarter of 2013, 69 percent of 1,024 people surveyed aged between 18 and 50 in China said they usually spent less than 200 yuan ($33) on imported wine for a casual occasion. Wine Intelligence did not provide figures for previous years because there was a change to its survey methodology. However, Wine Intelligence said there is growing demand for less expensive wine in China.

 

“There is a growing trend of drinking wine for pleasure rather than buying it primarily as a gift or serving it at banquets as a status symbol and, along with this growth in more casual drinking, there’s also a higher demand for wine at more affordable price points,” said Maria Troein, China country manager of Wine Intelligence.

 

There is no industry definition for entry-level wine or affordable wine. However, industry insiders said wine priced below 200 yuan could be defined as entry-level wine.

 

“The Chinese, as in other mature markets, are showing more interest in wine and getting to know more about it. This has created new market segments of young drinkers who like to drink wine and that fits their lifestyles – whether it is in restaurants, bars or even at home,” said Joao Gago, managing director of Boutique Wine Asia. BwA is an imported-wine trading company in China with annual trading volume of 20 containers of wine from more than 10 countries.

 

Gago said 50 percent of BwA sales are made up of wine priced around 90 yuan, an increase from 25 percent in 2012.

 

“Before it was not common to see a Chinese person order a bottle of wine in a restaurant or buy wine to share with friends at home. Now it is becoming better appreciated. It has become part of daily life, especially in bigger and more sophisticated cities such as Shanghai,” said Gago.

 

“Wine is said to be good for the health and a bottle of wine might provoke more topics to talk about in one’s leisure time,” said Wang Yue, a white-collar worker in Shanghai.

 

The gradually maturing wine market in China has made wine businesses in Bordeaux, France, keen to introduce more affordable varieties to the Chinese market to capture demand from ordinary people. In previous years, Bordeaux wine was considered to be a symbol of social status and only suitable for high-end business banquets. Bordeaux wine traders are trying to change that image.

 

Every year, the Bordeaux Wine Council (Conseil Interprofessionnel du Vin de Bordeaux, or CIVB in French), a French group that represents more than 10,000 Bordeaux wine producers and vine growers, recommends to Chinese wine lovers a selection of 100 Bordeaux wines that are best adapted to the Chinese market and are priced at the entry and medium levels (100 to 350 yuan a bottle).

 

“We want the customers to know that not all Bordeaux wines are expensive. Some of them are but there are also some that are affordable and of good quality,” said Thomas Jullien, Asia Manager of the CIVB.

 

China has become the first export destination for Bordeaux wine. In 2012, China imported a total of 64 million liters of Bordeaux wines, twice the volume sent to Germany, its closest rival, according to CIVB data.

 

Changing market conditions are also pushing Chinese wine makers to develop less expensive brands to better fit market demand.

 

“Our new products will be priced between 50 yuan to 100 yuan a bottle, affordable for ordinary folk. This is in line with the relatively slower economic growth this year,” said Luan Xiuju, managing director of China Foods Ltd, the Hong Kong-listed consumer food arm of the country’s largest State-owned food conglomerate China National Cereals, Oils and Foodstuffs Corp

 

Industry experts believe more affordable wine will help cultivate a wine culture in China and boost market demand in the long run.

 

“China’s market is growing very fast but people are still less familiar with the wine culture than they are in Western countries. The most important thing right now is to bring wine into households as well as people’s daily lives,” said Ma Wenfeng, a senior analyst at Beijing Orient Agribusiness Consultant.

 

 

——

Bill Howell, former CEO of Miller Brewing, dies at 83

 

Source: Washington Post

By John Schmid

June 2

 

When Bill Howell joined Miller Brewing in 1970, the “champagne of beers” ranked as the nation’s No. 7 brew.

 

But Mr. Howell helped widen the appeal to a mass market of blue-collar drinkers and transform the American brewing industry with the introduction of the nation’s first mainstream low-calorie beer. By the time he retired from Miller in 1988, it was the nation’s No. 2 brewery.

 

Mr. Howell died May 25 in Richmond after a long illness. He was 83.

 

“The goal was to take Miller out of the champagne bucket and put it into the lunch bucket without losing that premium image,” said Leonard Goldstein, who replaced Mr. Howell as Miller’s chief executive.

 

He moved to build new breweries to keep up with demand, said Billy Apple, a retired Miller executive who worked for decades with Howell.

 

William K. Howell grew up in rural Virginia and attended the University of Richmond, where he played wide receiver on a football scholarship and studied business. After a stint in the Marine Corps, he took a job at the Philip Morris tobacco company in Richmond.

 

When Philip Morris diversified beyond its cigarette brands with the 1970 acquisition of Miller Brewing, Mr. Howell moved to Milwaukee to become vice president of operations. He became chief executive in 1984.

 

At the time of the Philip Morris acquisition, Miller was best known for its “High Life” brand.

 

Philip Morris wanted to bring a new image to Miller. Mr. Howell helped introduce the “It’s Miller time” advertising slogan, conveying the notion that Miller was the beer of the working man.

 

Miller’s biggest breakthrough was the 1973 introduction of Miller Lite. No other brewery had found the brewing formula or marketing strategy for a successful low-calorie, low-alcohol beer.

 

Mr. Howell worked with the brewmasters on a formula that had 96 calories but tasted like regular lager. The idea was to market Miller Lite to men and dispel the notion that it was a watery women’s drink.

 

Miller created a genre of amusing television advertisements, hiring sports figures such as John Madden, Mike Ditka, Bob Uecker and celebrities such as Rodney Dangerfield.

 

Mr. Howell worked with the marketing team to come up with the slogan, “Great Taste, Less Filling.” Commercials ended with the catchphrase: “Everything you’ve always wanted in a beer. And less.”

 

Miller ignited change across the brewing world. Other breweries followed suit with light beers of their own, including Miller’s main rival, Anheuser-Busch.

 

Since Mr. Howell retired, Miller has had several ownership changes. South African Breweries acquired Miller in 2002, and it now exists in a joint venture with Molson Coors, called MillerCoors. It retains its brewing operations in Milwaukee.

 

Mr. Howell is survived by his wife, two sons and grandchildren.

 

 

——

RPI hits 10-month high as business expectations improve

 

Source: NRA

May 31, 2013

 

Driven by higher same-store sales and an improving outlook among restaurant operators, the National Restaurant Association’s Restaurant Performance Index (RPI) hit a 10-month high in April.  The RPI stood at 101.0 in April, up 0.4 percent from a level of 100.6 in March, and is the third time in the last four months that the RPI topped the 100 level, which signifies expansion in the index of key industry indicators.

 

“Growth in the Restaurant Performance Index was due largely to restaurant operators’ healthier outlook for the business environment in the coming months,” said Hudson Riehle, senior vice president of the Research and Knowledge Group for the Association.  “In particular, there was a dropoff in the proportion of operators who expect conditions to worsen in the months ahead, which suggests a broadening of the perspective that the expansion is firmly entrenched.”

 

The RPI consists of two components – the Current Situation Index (measuring current trends) and the Expectations Index (measuring restaurant operators’ six-month outlook) – and tracks the health of and outlook for the U.S. restaurant industry.

 

The Current Situation Index stood at 100.1 in April – up 0.3 percent from a level of 99.8 in March.  April represented the first time in eight months that the Current Situation Index rose above 100. While overall sales were positive in April, restaurant operators reported a net decline in customer traffic for the fifth consecutive month.

 

The Expectations Index stood at 101.9 in April – up 0.5 percent from March and the highest level in 11 months.  Each of the four expectations indicators stood above 100 for the fourth consecutive month, which indicates a firming of optimism for business conditions in the months ahead.

 

Restaurant operators also reported an uptick in plans for capital spending in the months ahead.  Fifty-nine percent of restaurant operators plan to make a capital expenditure for equipment, expansion or remodeling in the next six months, up from 55 percent who reported similarly last month.

 

Restaurant operators are also somewhat more optimistic about staffing growth in the months ahead.  Twenty-two percent of operators plan to increase staffing levels in six months (compared to the same period in the previous year), while just 10 percent said they plan to cut positions.

 

 

——

United Kingdom: Alcohol trade body to enforce rules outside ASA’s remit

 

Source: Marketing Week

By Sebastian Joseph

Fri, 31 May 2013

 

PR, blogs and any other content beyond the remit of the Advertising Standards Authority will now be regulated by industry body the Portman Group after it expanded its code of practice.

 

The Portman Group will now regulate alcohol marketing laws outside the ASA’s remit.

 

The clamp down on gaps between the remits of both regulatory bodies are part of changes to the industry body’s voluntary code of conduct governing the marketing of alcohol (see box).

 

Producers now being able to make lower-strength of their of their drinks a dominate theme in advertising campaigns. This was prohibited in the past but the group is hoping the shift will spur the industry’s Responsibility Deal with the Government by introducing and promoting new lower-strength alcohol ranges.

 

Alcohol brands will also be required to promote responsible drinking as a key part of any sponsorship campaign. Brewers AB Inbev and Heineken already do this through their work around the FA Cup and Champions League respectively.

 

Henry Ashworth, chief executive of the Portman Group said the updates, some of which were first mooted in 2011 alongside the launch of the Responsibility Deal, aim to strike the “right balance between enabling innovative campaigns and NPD while also curbing “unacceptable” marketing.

 

He adds: “The industry works hard to operate an effective and practical approach to self-regulation which is supported by producers and retailers and I am encouraged that Government has recognised this in its alcohol strategy.

 

The Portman Group, which is funded by the UK’s nine biggest producers and has 140 signatories, is working with the Government to help shape its alcohol strategy. The strategy, due to be announced later this year, could lead to another revision of the laws.

 

It comes a week after UK regulators revealed they are to review whether tougher rules on alcohol brands advertising on TV are needed.

 

Revision of the ‘Code of Practice on Naming Packaging and Promotion of Alcoholic Drinks’:

 

Ensure consistent and seamless self-regulation – the remit of the code has been expanded so that it covers all alcohol marketing not regulated by the ASA or Ofcom. This also extends to online marketing such as user-generated content not claimed by the publisher.

 

Clamp down on inappropriate marketing claims – brands can no longer make direct or indirect links with sexual activity or references to sexual success.

 

Protect under 18s – Images of people who are (or look like they are) under 25 can longer be featured in campaigns drinking or holding alcohol.

 

Promote low and lower alcohol alternatives – Brands can make the lower alcohol content of their drinks a more prominent part of marketing activity.

 

Introduce a UK-wide Sponsorship Code – Drinks makers will be required to promote responsible drinking as an integral part of any sponsorship activity.

 

 

——

Iran: Seven Die in Iran After Drinking Homemade Alcohol

 

Source: NY Times

By THOMAS ERDBRINK

June 3rd

 

A batch of illegally distilled alcohol has killed seven people, sent dozens to the hospital and blinded several others in the southern Iranian city of Rafsanjan, local news media reported Sunday.

 

Hospitals in Rafsanjan started filling up last week with patients who were complaining of a loss of vision and other symptoms consistent with alcohol poisoning. Doctors in the area blame concoctions containing high levels of methanol – a simple alcohol used as an antifreeze and also for biofuels – mixed with energy drinks.

 

Most of the victims were young. “All those who died were men under the age of 27,” said Dr. Hamid Najmedin of the Rafsanjan Medical Science University, the Ebtekarnews Web site reported Sunday.

 

Alcohol is strictly forbidden in Iran, and those caught consuming it can be punished with a lashing according to Iran’s Islamic laws. Persistent use is punishable by death. But large amounts of foreign alcohol is smuggled in, and many Iranians drink a kind of homemade vodka known as arak sagi, or dog sweat.

 

A bottle of smuggled vodka costs the equivalent of $28, while the locally made product sells for about one-third less.

 

Government policies that have stoked inflation, and international economic sanctions have driven up the prices of all products, including smuggled alcohol, forcing many Iranians to buy homemade liquor. In the past seven months the number of deaths related to bad alcohol has more than doubled, the semiofficial Mehr news agency has reported.

 

But some officials in the region cast this most recent episode as part of a political plot to influence the June 14 presidential election or to lower voter turnout as a way to raise doubts about the popularity of Iran’s leaders. The governor of Rafsanjan, which is a relatively wealthy region that is the center of Iran’s pistachio cultivation, said the alcohol distributors were trying to stop people from voting.

 

“We are creating a political epic, but some people are trying to create an atmosphere in which they can achieve their mischievous goals,” the governor, Akbar Pourmohammadi, told the semiofficial Fars news agency, adding that three people had been arrested. It is unclear whether those poisoned by the illegal alcohol will be punished.

 

 

——

Nevada: Wirtz Beverage Nevada Bolsters Craft Segment In the Marketplace

 

Renowned Brands & Industry Experts Join the Distributor

 

Source: Respublica

May 31st

 

Wirtz Beverage Nevada (WBN) announced today strategic investments in the craft category supporting its progressive expansion statewide. Several renowned national and regional artisanal beer and spirit brands along with three industry experts join the company, a leader in the wholesale distribution of beer, wine and spirits.

 

“We see incredible opportunity in the craft business so we forward invest behind great brands and with the right specialization,” said Kevin Roberts, SVP Wirtz Beverage Nevada. “With our continued expansion into the category, our footprint is expected to grow exponentially.  Leveraging the expertise of our specialists, we foresee even more opportunity for growth.”

 

With committed professionals leading the effort, such as Craft Brand Specialist Kent Bearden, the Wirtz Beverage Nevada team is comprised of a talented ensemble of beer, wine and spirits experts with a wide range of abilities and experience. The newly-appointed craft experts will bolster the Wirtz Beverage Nevada team and include:

 

Michael Shetler, Craft Brand Specialist:  Michael Shetler is an industry veteran holding several highly-lauded accreditations including Sommelier, Cicerone Beer Server, BAR and Beer Judge Certifications and is also currently working towards Cicerone ranking. Holding varied senior-level industry positions, most recently, Michael was Director of Beverage for the Aria Hotel where he oversaw all beverage operations. In his role with WBN, Michael will help enhance the programming and performance of its craft portfolio.

 

Jack Kramer, Craft Brand Specialist:  A graduate of the Culinary Institute of America and University of Nevada Las Vegas, Jack holds respective degrees in Culinary Arts Management and Hospitality Management. Career experience includes more than seven years in the wholesale beverage industry. An accredited beverage professional, Jack is a Certified Cicerone and Certified Sommelier. With WBN, His expertise will contribute to building craft brands.

 

Joseph Morandi, Head Draft Technician – Northern Nevada: A student of zymurgy for more than 20 years, Joe is an avid home brewer and winemaker with Cicerone Beer Server and Beer Judge Certifications as well as Micro Matic Advance Draft Training. Currently, Joe is also pursuing a Siebel Institute Associate Brewing Science degree. A renowned expert, Joe owned a quality draft line service company. In his new role, Joe will oversee the quality and service standards of the WBN craft beer portfolio including proper delivery methods and pouring techniques.

 

Together, the specialized team will support the company’s integration of its artisanal brands statewide, now including the Reno/Northern region. Its expansion into the category includes newly-formed partnerships with many illustrious brands some of which include Rogue Brewery, Ballast Point, Green Flash, Sierra Blanca and Santa Fe.

 

Continuing education, training and programming efforts demonstrate Wirtz Beverage Nevada’s commitment to the craft business.  Already, its sales force has undergone extensive training with all members holding Level One Cicerone accreditation.

 

“There is an incredible appreciation, both inside and outside the walls of Wirtz Beverage, for the craft segment,” said Kent Bearden. “The additions to our company complement our ability to service the market’s growing demand for premium beverage offerings with the knowledge and service to match.”

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Corbett – lawmakers need to act now on transportation funding

 

Source: WHTM

By Dennis Owens

May 30th

 

Cars and trucks zipped along Interstate-83 in Cumberland County directly behind Governor Corbett today as he strained his voice to be heard over them.

 

But he delivered a clear message, mostly intended for House Republicans: get me a transportation funding plan and get it to me in time for the June 30 budget deadline.

 

Corbett no doubt senses that transportation funding is in a legislative logjam and he hopes this roadside press conference will help free it from Capitol congestion.

 

The governor wants either his $1.8 billion plan or Senate Bill 1, a $2.5 billion plan, passed. Both the Senate and governor’s plan would increase fees and gasoline taxes to pay for additional funding for roads, bridges and mass transit, which are frequently criticized and widely considered among the worst in the nation.

 

“This is how we get a sustainable long-term solution to having funding for Pennsylvania for transportation,” Corbett said.

 

PennDOT Secretary Barry Schoch gave specific examples of where new money would go. He showed the brand new Lowther Street bridge in the background as an example of the good things that can happen with more cash. He also warned that projects like the widening of Interstate 83 would be scrapped without extra money.

 

“The reason for that is, we’ll go back to basic maintenance,” Schoch said. “Unfortunately, if we don’t take action on funding, this is the last of these type projects you’ll see in the Harrisburg region.”

 

House Transportation Committee Chairman Dick Hess (R-Bedford/Fulton/Huntingdon) agreed and said lawmaker should approve more funding.

 

“We’ve kicked this can down the road for 13 years now,” Hess said at the press conference. “We have to do something. You sent us here to be leaders. I know it’s not the most popular thing to do, but sometimes you have to do what’s right.”

 

But right is wrong to many House Republicans who worry about passing a bill that would raise prices at the gas pump. Majority Leader Mike Turzai (R-Allegheny) was less than enthusiastic about the issue when asked about it Wednesday.

 

“Transportation has always been a Senate priority,” he said. “It has not been a House priority.” Remember, leaders drive the agenda in the General Assembly.

 

What is a priority for the House Republicans is liquor privatization. House Whip Stan Saylor (R-York) is in charge of rounding up votes. He says votes for roads would flow more freely if the Senate would reciprocate on booze.

 

“There’s a chunk of the members in the House Republican caucus and they’re saying, ‘We want the liquor bill.’ That is the tradeoff for getting their vote on transportation.”

 

There’s no official link between liquor and transportation, but based on that comment, there’s a de facto linkage between the two.

 

Saylor smiled and said, “I’m just being honest.”

 

A year ago, also beside a busy road, then-Auditor General Jack Wagner poked a stick at a  crumbling bridge support in Harrisburg. He forcefully asked the legislature to act on a transportation plan.

 

Wagner’s big stick didn’t work but Corbett’s trying the highway-side press conference tactic. It remains to be seen if that will work.

 

Corbett made it clear he wants transportation, and pension reform, and liquor privatization on his desk with the budget, by the deadline that is now 30 days away.

 

But if lawmakers continue to stall on a transportation package, they risk getting run over by the issue.

 

Adams County Representative Dan Moul (R) seems to understand the danger of suggesting that roads and bridges, “aren’t a priority.”

 

“I don’t want to wait until a school bus full of school children goes through a bridge and into a river to do something about it. I want to be proactive.”

 

In federal and state dollars, PennDOT currently spends about $6 billion a year.

Find Us Online

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Like Us On Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/franklinliquorsMA

Follow Us On Twitter

http://www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

 

Liquor Industry News 5-31-13

May 31, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Friday May 31st 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic FLOWER Day.

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

Reminder Saturday June 1st 3:30-5:30

Stop In For A Bud Light Lime-A-Rita Tasting!

 

Don’t lower blood alcohol content to .05%: Our view

 

Source: USA Today

The Editorial Board

May 30, 2013

 

Instead, broaden the use of ignition interlocks.

 

The battle against drunken driving is one of the great success stories of recent years. Over three decades, the number of annual deaths has been cut in half, from more than 20,000 to less than 10,000. Even so, on average one person still dies every hour in a drinking-related traffic accident in the United States, leaving plenty of room to reduce the toll further.

 

That’s what the National Transportation Safety Board had in mind this month when it recommended that all states cut their legal drinking limit from .08% blood alcohol content (BAC) to .05%. You can’t argue with the NTSB’s motives, but you can argue with its logic.

 

A 170-pound man could hit .05 by consuming three beers or glasses of wine in an hour, and a 137-pound woman by consuming just two. So lowering the legal limit would turn a lot of responsible social drinkers into criminals. More important, it probably wouldn’t do much to reduce drunken driving deaths.

 

According to statistics the NTSB cites, drivers with a .05 to .08 BAC represent just 8% of all drivers involved in fatal accidents. And that number doesn’t even reflect whether alcohol-impairment caused the crash.

 

The NTSB also points to reduced fatalities in some European countries with .05 limits. But drivers in these countries also face huge fines or frequent sobriety checkpoints, so it’s impossible to credit the .05 BAC limit for the decline.

 

In any event, there’s no political stomach in the USA for going down to .05%, and even the influential Mothers Against Drunk Driving hasn’t endorsed the NTSB proposal.

 

So how to maintain the progress?

 

One promising option is to expand use of ignition interlocks, alcohol detection devices that drivers must blow into to start their cars.

 

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, interlocks lower the re-arrest rate of drunken drivers by two-thirds. In fact, drivers with ignition interlocks had fewer alcohol-related accidents than those who were punished by having their licenses suspended.

 

Some states have had great success with interlocks. After approving strict interlock laws in 2007, Arizona and Louisiana both cut drunken driving deaths by more than 36% in just four years. This month, Tennessee joined them, becoming the 18th state to mandate interlocks for all convicted drunken drivers, even first offenders.

 

Too many other states, however, have interlock laws that do more to appease convicted drunken drivers than control them. Colorado, for example, mandates them only for drivers convicted with a BAC of .17 or above, more than double the legal limit. Alabama requires any DUI offender with a child under 15 to install an interlock device. So is the message that it’s OK to kill a 15-year-old in a drunken driving accident?

 

The carnage produced by drunken driving will never be eradicated, but the nation can get closer by employing strategies already proven to work.

 

USA TODAY’s editorial opinions are decided by its Editorial Board, separate from the news staff. Most editorials are coupled with an opposing view — a unique USA TODAY feature.

 

 

——

China’s Distilled Liquor Industry, After 10 Years Of Sustained Growth, Suffers Severe Contraction In First Quarter

 

Source: IBT

By Sophie Song

May 30 2013

 

China’s distilled liquor, known as “baijiu,” is experiencing the first industry-wide contraction in the past 10 years, driven by a fall in high-end liquor consumption since President Xi’s austerity measures went into effect in December 2012. In response, high-end brands are now lowering their prices and turning to the Internet to market their products.

 

Baijiu is a term that refers to all Chinese distilled alcoholic beverages, usually made from sorghum but can be made from other grains. It generally contains about 40 percent to 60 percent alcohol by volume. In the past 10 years, the baijiu industry has experienced enormous growth.

 

In 2001, baijiu brought in a total of 49.9 billion yuan ($8.14 billion), according to Jiuwenhua.cn, a Chinese liquor industry news website. In 2012, baijiu sales in China totaled 447 billion yuan, a near tenfold increase. Unfortunately, that expansion came to a screeching halt in the first quarter of 2013.

 

Maotai, which is traditionally considered the best baijiu, saw a 23.8 percent decrease in its first quarter 2013 sales compared to the same period last year, according to Yangtze Evening News, a regional Chinese newspaper. Last year, in the high-spending period just before Chinese New Year, a bottle of Maotai sold for over 2,000 yuan, but now the price has fallen to as low as 700 yuan in some areas.

 

This sharp fall in sales is in large part due to President Xi’s policies which discourage Chinese public officials from entertaining with government funding, also affecting the restaurant business.

 

“Entertaining with public funding is much less common now,” a salesperson for a liquor store in the city of Nanjing said, according to Yangtze. “But now that the price has fallen, some private citizens are buying high-end liquor.”

 

Wuliangye, another high-end brand, saw its price fall from 900 yuan per bottle to just over 600 yuan. Ironically, this price adjustment from Maotai and Wuliangye may not help their sales.

 

“Before, Maotai was too expensive to buy as a gift,” said a shopper identified by his last name, Fang. “But now that the price has fallen, we still can’t buy it as a gift, because everyone knows how much Maotai’s price has declined.”

 

He would rather buy a mid-range brand with a stable price tag, he added. Middle-grade brands, usually priced around 300 to 400 yuan, did not have to adjust their prices even in this market, and grew in popularity. Luzhou Laojiao, a mid-range brand, increased its sales by 22 percent in the first quarter compared to the same period last year.

 

In a suddenly bleak market, luxury baijiu producers are now turning to the Internet to help drive sales, according to Xinhua News, a state-run news agency. Many high-end brands that previously prided themselves on not being sold online are now working with Internet retailers. A few, Maotai included, have also begun selling the liquor on their own website.

 

Internet baijiu sales only make up 3 percent to 4 percent of the total baijiu market currently.

 

“In the next three to four years, Internet sales may rise to comprise 7 percent to 8 percent of the market,” said Lu Zhenwang, an e-retail analyst, according to Xinhua News.

 

 

——

Diageo

 

Source: Nomura

May 31st

 

Buy, Lord Shackleton

 

Following the Pernod Asia investor event in China, Lord Shacks met with the Head of Diageo Asia in Singapore and he confirmed many of the trends discussed by Pernod – slowdown in imported spirits in China likely to continue for calendar 2013, long-term looks positive still but a wider portfolio of spirits will be necessary. Although FY13 and FY14 are seeing slower momentum, this is relatively immaterial for Diageo and is offset by strong growth in other regions (Latam, Africa). We continue to see Diageo as the best investment in spirits.

 

Asia accounts for c.10% of FY13 group EBIT and includes large positions in mature countries like Korea and Australia as well as exposure to emerging Asia. Company still targets double digit revenue growth in the region although headwinds, esp in China as well as Korea, have slowed this in FY13 (our est +6%) and for FY14 (our est +8%). As indicated on the recent Asia division call, company expects some improvement in runrate from H2 FY14. Company has always placed strong weighting on middle class growth for spirits rather than the high net worth individuals, and there is some feeling that the Pernod investor day moved Pernod closer to this approach.

 

China

Co still sees slowdown in Scotch and cal Q1 decline in baiju (-40% at Shui Jing Fang) as temporary, but is not banking on upturn until cal 2014. Wholesaler inventories in line with PY, so no big destocking issue. Co has taken Scotch pricing (+2-6%) but this has not been followed by Pernod yet. Whereas Pernod is seeking to widen its portfolio through wine/champagne in particular, Diageo is focused on other spirits where it sees better profitability (Baileys, Ketel One, Ciroc, Zacapa). Even with a wider portfolio, other competitors will struggle to compete due to lack of critical mass.

 

India

Company still expects to complete on the initial 27% stake in United Spirits by end June; with Mallya’s support for 4 years, this allows the company to take control as it intended. The gameplan remains unchanged here; company sees many US managers (ex big FMCG) as ready to pay more attention to compliance in the business in future. No strong visibility on when import tax on Scotch will be reduced, may well be now after Indian elections; ultimately co still sees enormous upside here.

 

Australia

Although beer is performing better, spirits remains very strong (spirits revenue+8%); however, this is offset by slower RTD to give overall revenue +3%. Wine is now performing less strong here.

 

Korea

Business still splits 80% traditional trade, 20% modern trade, so decline in the traditional trade continues to pull back the business into declines. For FY14 company expects this to improve.

 

Beer

Still important in some markets.  In Indonesia co uses beer distribution for spirits now; in Malaysia it does not as spirits is in a JV with Moet-Hennessy. Beer is still important in several markets; although co is unlikely to make major beer investment, it does not rule out small strategic moves. Relationship with Heineken can also be useful – co could use Heineken for spirits distribution in Myanmar where it has just entered market.

 

 

——

Molson Coors Satisfies Consumer Thirst for Innovative Brews This Summer

 

Source: National Post

May 29, 2013

 

Gearing up for a hot summer, Molson Coors Brewing Company (NYSE: TAP) (TSX: TPX) is showcasing a global lineup of product innovations designed to expand its portfolio and provide consumers with the variety they want while deepening their connections to iconic brands like Coors Light, Carling, Molson Canadian and Staropramen. From the release of Third Shift Amber Lager and Molson Canadian Wheat, to a variety of Carling Zest and Leinenkugel summer brews, consumers will have everything they want to stay cool and refreshed this summer.

 

“At Molson Coors, innovation starts with the consumer, and we have to update constantly. We are in a continuous dialogue with beer drinkers and what we hear is that they like to experiment; they want interesting choices to cover a variety of occasions,” said Peter Swinburn, president and chief executive officer of Molson Coors. “With over 300 years of brewing heritage, we have a unique track record of delivering brands that are loved by generation after generation.”

 

Meeting Consumer Demand for Variety, Cold Refreshment and Natural/Local Products

 

Third Shift Amber Lager marks the first release in a series of award-winning beers brewed by the Band of Brewers – a group of talented brewers across the MillerCoors network in the U.S. This light lager is becoming a favorite among consumers thanks to its mild flavor profile that is perfect for a warm summer day. The Band of Brewers crafted Third Shift Amber Lager into a gold-medal winning, well-balanced, yet complex lager with a sweet maltiness, lightly toasted flavoring and subtle hops.

 

In February, Redd’s Apple Ale became available nationwide, following a select regional launch by MillerCoors in the summer 2012. The new apple flavored golden ale offers a crisp finish that allows the natural apple flavor to come through, making it the perfect drink choice for those looking to try something different.

 

U.S. consumers will also enjoy Blue Moon’s latest limited release, Sunshine Citrus Blonde. Blue Moon brewers crafted this beer to awaken the palates of consumers for the warmer weather of summer. Pairing the light citrus notes of this blonde brew with dishes such as summer salads, grilled pork and fruit-based desserts will create a perfect warm weather evening out on the patio.

 

In Canada, consumers can sample three new refreshing beverages this summer, beginning with the recently launched Molson Canadian Wheat. Made with all-natural ingredients like Canadian spring wheat, it is an unfiltered wheat lager that delivers a hint of malt, balanced by the fruity character of just-ripened bananas.

 

The Canadian market will also see the launch of Rickard’s Shandy, a blend of lager and classic lemonade. Shandies are popular in markets around the world, and Rickard’s looks to captivate Canada with this crisp, refreshing summer drink.

 

Lastly, this summer the Molson trademark will move outside of beer for the first time in its 226-year history with the introduction of Molson Canadian Cider. Made entirely from Canadian apples, its bold crisp flavor will feature a balanced medium sweetness and medium acidity.

 

Consumers in the Central European region are also gravitating towards combined beverages that offer the refreshment of a cider and the thirst-quenching nature of beer. In the Czech Republic, Molson Coors Europe will debut Staropramen Cool Cider Beer Mix, the world’s first low-alcohol cider beer mix that offers a moderate choice for consumers who want to stay refreshed this summer season. An additional moderate choice for Hungary consumers is the non-alcoholic beer mix Borsodi Friss Zero.

 

Another expected favorite comes from Molson Coors’ expansion of its limited edition lager for the U.K. and Ireland, Carling Zest, with a new flavor, Carling Zest with a Hint of Ginger. The latest flavor of Carling Zest offers a refreshingly mild taste of ginger and 2.8 percent alcohol by volume (ABV), making it a great summer beer for a hot day. Beer drinkers in the U.K. will also enjoy several new brews from Sharp’s, beginning with Sharp’s first Connoisseur’s Choice beer of the year, Sharp’s Spiced Red.

 

Bringing Excitement to Beer Occasions

 

Last year’s successful launch of Coors Light Iced T in Canada will take on a new serving method this summer, driven by consumer inspiration and feedback. This summer, Coors Light Iced T will be “Nice with a Slice Over Ice”. Considering that tea and beer are the second and third most consumed beverages in the world after water, Coors Light Iced T adds a new twist to the trend through its unique combinations of the sweet maltiness of Coors Light – Canada’s favorite light beer – with a blend of natural tea and lemon flavors.

 

Positive consumer response has also driven the introduction of two new beer mixes in Central Europe. Capitalizing on the success of 2011 and 2012 beer mixes, such as Lemon and Grapefruit, Molson Coors Europe will introduce Bitter Orange along with Blackcurrant & Lime. Beer mixes have played a significant role in growing the beer category in the region and have been launched as extensions to the local mainstream brands in all nine markets in Central Europe.

 

 

——

Coors Apologizes For Using Puerto Rico’s Flag On Beer Cans, Halts Production

 

Source: Fox News Latino

By Kacy Capobres

May 30, 2013

 

MillerCoors has issued an apology and pulled a product that became a public relations nightmare.

 

Public officials and Puerto Rican groups had expressed outrage after the company used an image of the island’s flag on a specially-made Coors Light beer can made on occasion of New York City’s Puerto Rican Day Parade.

 

MillerCoors is the main sponsor of the parade, which is on Sunday.

 

The company initially stayed mum – but the controversy continued to grow. On Thursday, MillerCoors sent a letter to “Boricuas for a Positive Image,” a group that planned protests against the company over the beer can, and said it was pulling the product from distribution.

 

“We apologize if the graphics on our promotional packaging inadvertently offended you or any other members of the Puerto Rican community,” wrote Nehl Horton, chief public affairs and communications director for MillerCoors, to one of the group’s organizers. “MillerCoors has a strong history of supporting the U.S. Latino community.”

 

He said the company was simply trying “to highlight the cultural strength and vibrancy of the Puerto Rican community.”

 

But that attempt seemed to have badly fumbled.

 

The company said it would cease distribution of the product starting Friday morning.

 

The decision comes just hours before Boricuas for a Positive Image, who started a campaign against the beer giant, was set to begin protesting outside one of the distributor headquarters in New York City. Vincent Torres, a community organizer for the group, said they were planning daily protests until the company met their demands.

 

“The Puerto Rican community and the Latino community have come together on this issue,” Torres said.

 

In a statement released last week, the New York-based community group said: “We believe Coors has insulted the Puerto Rican community by using this promotion before the parade.”

 

Along with contacting Coors directly, the group also sent a letter to Simon Bergson of Manhattan Beer Distributors asking that he “immediately stop manufacturing and/or distributing your offensive promotion.”

 

But The National Institute for Latino Policy said the beer company wasn’t the only one at fault. The group also said blame must be placed on the parade’s board of directors.

 

New York City Councilwoman Melissa Mark-Viverito told the the New York Daily News that the company’s decision to pull the product was a “victory.” But the Puerto Rican politician said she wasn’t entirely satisfied.

 

“I feel strongly at this time that the Board of Directors should resign and make room for new leadership for future parades,” Viverito said in a statement.

 

 

——

McDonnell steps down from Patrón

 

Source: Drinks International

By Christian Davis

31 May, 2013

 

The announcement yesterday of the appointment of Dave Wilson’s appointment as Patrón Spirits’ new president of international operations and global COO, follows the surprise decision by John McDonnell to step down.

 

McDonnell told shocked staff this week that he has been in the industry for 30 years, and has decided he wants a change. He said it is “time to slow down a bit, and maybe pursue something more entrepreneurial”.

 

To most industry observers the meteoric rise of Patrón and particularly its super premium Tequila, has been down to McDonnell’s vision and entrepreneurial verve.

 

McDonnell began at Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, where he worked in domestic and international sales and marketing. McDonnell did well at Seagram with his strategic use of marketing instead of cost-cutting to increase revenue, despite difficult times – as country manager for Taiwan, his leadership is said to have turned the business around in three years from a US$13 million loss to a $21 million profit.

 

He joined Patrón and was appointed chief operating officer in January, 2005. In 2013, he relocated to the company’s headquarters in Switzerland to take on the additional role of president of Patrón’s international operations, monitoring and managing the company’s day-to-day activities both in the US and abroad, reporting to the chief executive officer. He also helped close the company’s acquisition of ultra premium Ultimat vodka and has led the company’s international and duty-free expansion into more than 130 countries and islands worldwide.

 

McDonnell’s responsibilities include overseeing Patrón’s manufacturing, sales, and marketing, including online social media. He was also involved with the company’s leadership in environmental responsibility. Patrón claims to have installed the first reverse osmosis water treatment plant in the history of Tequila in Mexico, has become one of the largest consumers of recycled glass in that country, and has been certified for years with ISO 14001 for environmental performance in reducing waste, cleaning the air, and limiting noise.

 

In February 2012, McDonnell was elected chairman of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS), the national trade association representing America’s leading distillers. Also in 2012, he was named to the board of trustees at Suffolk University in Boston. McDonnell is also co-owner of an entrepreneurial venture, now in its second decade: The Action Group USA, a beverage sales and marketing consulting firm.

 

On behalf of Patrón, McDonnell has been a supporter of numerous philanthropic and charitable organisations. The company works to make a difference on issues ranging from children’s health, to hunger and clean water, to the rebuilding of New Orleans. In addition, he contributes to civic and educational causes in his native Boston.

 

 

——

Maker’s Mark plans ‘rinse process’ to get the last of the bourbon from its barrels

 

Bourbon demand outrunning supply

 

Source: Courier Journal

May 31, 2013   

 

Maker’s Mark plans to rinse its bourbon barrels to get as much liquor out of them as possible in yet another effort to keep up with demand for its signature whiskey.

 

The “state-of-the-art rinse process” would be part of a plan for $8.2 million in upgrades at its Loretto, Ky., distillery.

 

The move comes less than four months after Maker’s Mark, owned by Deerfield, Ill.-based Beam Inc., announced an ill-fated plan to add more water to the bourbon – decreasing its alcohol content, but stretching supply to meet strong demand worldwide. The company quickly walked back from the plan after a backlash from customers.

 

Maker’s Mark now plans to “extract additional gallons” from its barreled bourbon with the process, according to documents filed with Kentucky economic development officials to get tax credits for the upgrades in a new facility at the distillery. The Kentucky Economic Development Finance Authority on Thursday offered Maker’s Mark $100,000 in rebates on construction materials and building fixtures if it moves forward with the plan.

 

Maker’s Mark parent Beam has already developed a process to extract “the rich whiskey trapped inside the barrels’ wood after they’re emptied,” according to Beam’s description of Devil’s Cut, a bourbon that it makes using the extracted liquor.

 

With the years required to age bourbon, distillers have to predict the market far in advance. Buffalo Trace, the Frankfort-based maker of Blanton’s, Buffalo Trace and Pappy Van Winkle, said recently its supply isn’t keeping pace with demand. Rather than take any extraordinary measures, the company said its supplies would simply be tighter. Buffalo Trace bourbons are aged from eight to 23 years.

 

The previous Maker’s Mark effort to extend supplies by adding extra water would have reduced the alcohol content of its signature bourbon to 84 proof from 90 proof, increasing supplies by up to 6 percent.

 

Maker’s Mark, which ages its bourbon at least five years and nine months, also plans a new 50,000-barrel aging warehouse. According to the state, production of Maker’s Mark has increased 10 percent a year for the last 20 years, and “sales volume is expected to grow significantly.”

 

Maker’s Mark CEO Rob Samuels did not return a call to his Louisville office Thursday.

 

 

——

Pernod Ricard Nigeria and CFAO Have Entered into a Distribution Agreement

 

Source: WEBWIRE

Friday, May 24, 2013

 

Pernod Ricard Nigeria, a subsidiary of Pernod Ricard Sub-Saharan Africa established in 2010 entered into a distribution agreement covering Nigeria at the beginning of April 2013 with the CFAO Group, via its subsidiary CFAO Nigeria and its distribution subsidiary. This contract covers the Group’s entire portfolio, and particularly the Martell, ABSOLUT and Chivas Regal brands. Duty Free customers and international supermarket chains are excluded from the terms of this agreement, as these are directly managed by Pernod Ricard Nigeria, which is in charge of importing and the local marketing development for all brands in the Pernod Ricard portfolio.

 

Dariusz Opieriowiec, Managing Director of Pernod Ricard Nigeria, stated: “As is the case for all Group subsidiaries in Africa, Pernod Ricard Nigeria aspires to establish healthy, sustainable positions with our new partner, in strict compliance with local laws and regulations. This distribution contract testifies to our long-term commitment to one of the most promising markets on the continent.”

 

Based in South Africa, where the Group has been firmly established since 1993, the goal of Pernod Ricard Sub-Saharan Africa is to develop the entire premium portfolio of the world’s co-leader in wines and spirits on the African continent. Driven by the middle class boom in the region, during the first half of the year Pernod Ricard reported 12% growth in the area, where the Group intends to roll out its growth model based on a portfolio of international brands, wholly-owned subsidiaries and a premiumisation strategy.

 

In 2012, Pernod Ricard Sub-Saharan Africa incorporated no less than five subsidiaries in the key African markets of Ghana, Angola, Kenya, Namibia and Nigeria since January 2013. Laurent Pillet, Managing Director of Pernod Ricard Sub-Saharan Africa, concluded: “In less than one year, we have managed to open direct subsidiaries in the region’s main markets, which is a condition precedent to laying the foundations for strong and sustainable growth with our local partners.”

 

 

——

United Kingdom: Huge rise in numbers treated for alcoholism

 

The number of drugs prescribed to treat alcoholism has increased by almost 75 per cent in less than a decade, new figures show.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Laura Donnelly, Health Correspondent

30 May 2013

 

Almost 180,000 prescription items were dispensed for such medication last year, a rise of 73 per cent since 2003.

 

During the same period, the number of hospital admissions related to drinking has more than doubled, according to figures from the Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC).

 

Almost £3 million was spent by the NHS last year on drugs to treat such problems, including Antabuse, which causes nausea and vomiting when alcohol is consumed

 

In 2011/12, there were 1,220,300 hospital admissions in England attributed to drinking – a sharp increase from 2002/03, when the figure stood at 510,700.

 

Men accounted for 63 per cent of such cases.

 

The report shows that people in the north West were more than twice as likely to be admitted to hospital because of an alcohol problem than those in the east of England.

 

Emily Robinson, director of campaigns at charity Alcohol Concern, said: “These figures show that the problems caused by alcohol misuse continue to rise, which is putting an increasing strain on our NHS.

 

She said: “The report highlights that the number of admissions to hospital for alcohol-related issues have risen by over 50 per cent in the last 10 years. The Government must get a grip and implement measures that will prevent this urgent situation from getting worse.”

 

The charity said that although increasing numbers of people are now getting drugs to help with alcohol dependency, most did not, with estimates that one in 17 people with alcohol problems receives specialist help.

 

Alan Perkins, chief executive of the HSCIC said: “Today’s report shows a substantial increase in the number of drugs prescribed for alcohol dependency compared to almost a decade ago. Today’s report illustrates the impact of alcohol misuse on hospitals in England, which will be of interest to health professionals, policymakers and the general public.”

 

A Department of Health spokesman said: “It’s encouraging to see that more people are getting help for problems with alcohol. But these figures prove that alcohol is causing harm to the health of hundreds of thousands of people and we must continue to act.

“That is why we are already improving prevention by funding alcohol risk assessments at GPs and encouraging increased access to alcohol liaison nurses in hospitals.

 

 

——

Russia: Alcohol addiction could doom Putin’s dreams

 

Source: Japan Times

by Cesar Chelala

May 31, 2013

 

Russians’ love for vodka has a long history. Legend holds that vodka arrived in Moscow in the 14th century, brought by Genovese merchants to Prince Dmitry Ivanovich.

 

Legend also says that the monk Isidore, of the Chudov Monastery inside the Kremlin, made a recipe for Russian vodka around 1430. He could not have anticipated the devastating effect that alcohol addiction, mainly to vodka, would have on Russians’ health and quality of life, and on the country’s economy and social fabric.

 

When the Bolshevik Party came to power its leaders tried – without much success – to reduce alcohol consumption in the Soviet Union. Josef Stalin re-established the state monopoly to generate revenue.

 

Mikhail Gorbachev, in 1985, increased controls on alcohol consumption and imposed a partial prohibition through a massive anti-alcohol campaign. That campaign, which included severe penalties against public drunkenness and alcohol consumption, as well as restrictions on liquor sales, was temporarily successful. It reduced per capita consumption and improved quality-of-life measures such as life expectancy and reduced hospital admissions. But the population disliked the policy and it had to be abandoned, its consequences felt again soon afterward.

 

Periodically reports surface on the great number of people who die as a result of consuming fake vodka and other alcohol substitutes. It is estimated that more than 40,000 Russians die every year after drinking toxic liquids that include medical disinfectants, after-shave lotions and other dangerous substances.

 

Today, the average Russian drinks the equivalent of 18 liters of pure alcohol a year, mostly as vodka and other black market moonshine called samogon. According to the World Health Organization, this consumption is far above what is considered safe to drink and greater than in any other nation in the world.

 

Russia has now one of the highest rates of alcohol-related illness, including long-term neurological, cardiovascular, psychiatric and liver problems.

 

In the short term, and generally as a result of binge drinking, several kinds of injuries and conditions follow: violence, risky sexual behavior (including unprotected sex), alcohol poisoning as well as miscarriages and stillbirths.

 

The connection between excessive drinking and interpersonal violence cannot be overstated. But due to social tolerance of violent behavior and incomplete or inaccurate information, official statistics record only a small percentage of violence. Some, however, are worrying. Among male perpetrators of spousal homicide, 60 to 75 percent of offenders had been drinking heavily before the incident.

 

Among young men, the risk of suicide is five times higher for heavy drinkers and nine times higher for alcoholics. Although men drink more than women, excessive alcohol consumption during pregnancy can result in the child developing fetal alcohol syndrome or showing fetal alcohol effects that are associated with delinquent and violent behavior later in life.

 

Russians’ poor health status has translated in a short life expectancy. According to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) Population Division, life expectancy for males in Russia is 61.56; for females it is 74.03. These figures are 17 years lower than in the Western European population. By contrast, for Japan the figures are 79.29 and 86.96, respectively.

 

In June 2009, the Public Chamber of Russia estimated 500,000 alcohol-related deaths in the country annually. This figure highlights a very serious situation particularly taking into consideration that the country is going through a severe demographic crisis: It is estimated that its population will drop 20 percent by 2050.

 

Although no precise figures are available, the direct and indirect costs of alcohol abuse in Russia can be considerable. Unless stronger measures are taken soon, Vladimir Putin’s dreams of a greater Russia will not be realized. The situation was aptly described by Oliver Bullough in his book “The Last Man in Russia”: “One man’s alcoholism is his own tragedy. A whole nation’s alcoholism is a tragedy too, but also a symptom of something far larger, of a collective breakdown.”

 

 

——

Scientists suggest beer after a workout

 

Source: The Washington Times

By Jessica Chasmar

May 31st

 

Researchers at Granada University in Spain have found that beer can help the body rehydrate better after a workout than water or Gatorade.

 

Professor Manuel Garzon also claimed the carbonation in beer helps to quench the thirst and that its carbohydrate content can help replace lost calories, The Telegraph reports.

 

The study involved a group of students who were asked to work out until their body temperature reached 104 degrees. Researchers then gave beer to half of the students and water to the other half.

 

Mr. Garzon announced the results at a press conference in Granada, saying the hydration effect in those who drank beer was “slightly better,” The Telegraph reports.

 

A cardiologist with the Real Madrid football team, Dr. Juan Antonio Corbalan, told the paper he long has recommended barley drinks to professional sportsmen after exhausting activities.

 

 

——

American Craft Distillers Association Welcomes Republic National Distributing Company as First Distributing Partner and Founding Sponsor

 

Source: ACDA

May 30th

 

Craft distilling is a powerful new phenomenon that is sweeping the country and Republic National Distributing Company (RNDC), the nation’s second largest premium wine and spirits distributor, sees a vibrant future for the entrepreneurs and artisans that are driving it. To help these distillers achieve their goals, RNDC announced its support of the American Craft Distillers Association (ACDA) through a commitment as a Founding Sponsor – the first distributer to carry the distinction.

 

As “craft” in all its forms continues to evolve and reshape the marketplace, the channels to market will become ever more important. As Penn Jensen, Executive Director of ACDA notes, “the strategic role of a high-profile distributor such as RNDC will be crucial to the sustainable growth of these burgeoning new brands.”

 

“At RNDC, we’re proud to support the entrepreneurs and artisans who are creating a dynamic new market with innovative products,” states Ken Rosenberg, RNDC Vice President of Wine & Craft Spirits. “As a leader in our industry – and the first distributor to join ACDA as a Founding Sponsor – we’re committed to providing critical business knowledge about the distribution tier to help Craft Distillers get their products to market and work within the sophisticated three-tier system of the United States.”

 

Ten years ago there were fewer than 60 craft distillers in the United States. According to current estimates, there may be as many as 1000 licensed distillers in North America by 2015. The range of products crosses a wide array of categories, from absinthe to whiskey and all points in between. The analogy is clear when one compares craft distilling to craft brewing. Craft brewing is one of the strongest beverage categories, growing at 25% per year and now, according to the Brewers’ Association, with total sales soaring above $10 billion annually.

 

ACDA was founded in 2013 by a prestigious group of artisan distillers to create a network of like-minded professionals to promote craft distilling and to seek favorable business environments in which to grow their brands.

 

“Craft distillers need a trade organization,” Jensen states. “And they need a friend in distribution with the knowledge and reach of RNDC to educate about this vital tier. We’re honored to welcome them on board.”

 

As part of the sponsorship, RNDC will also provide valuable information about the distribution tier in ACDA’s “Ask the Expert” section, which is available to members seeking sustainable solutions about a particular topic.

 

For more information about ACDA, visit americancraftdistillersassociation.org.

 

 

——

Angostura: 10 Cane Rum did not bring sufficient returns

 

Source: The Guardian

Raphael John-Lall

Thursday, May 30, 2013

 

Angostura decided not to renew its contract with luxury giant Moet Hennessy to produce 10 Cane Rum in T&T because the premium rum was not generating sufficient business. In a statement yesterday, Angostura said: “After almost a decade working with Moet Hennessey, Angostura decided not to renew the contracts since it did not bring the returns necessary to continue the business.” The company said they had started to close down operations years ago.

 

“Part of the operations for 10 Cane rum was actually closed for a few years because of insufficient demand. We worked with their team on relocation and wish them all the success in the future,” Angostura said. The Paris-based Moet Hennessy, one of the world’s leading wine and spirit groups, moved its production of its 10 Cane rum brand from Trinidad to the Foursquare Rum Distillery in Barbados. This is expected to pour in as much as US $50 million in foreign exchange in the Barbados economy.

 

Sir David Seale, chairman, Foursquare Rum Distillery, in announcing the agreement, described it as “Barbados’ gain over T&T”, Barbados Industry Minister, Donville Inniss said Barbados is not a low-cost location for manufacturing and as a result they have to tap into the niche areas and rum is a product that is synonymous with Barbados and they will have to exploit fully the rum industry.

 

In welcoming the deal earlier this week, Foursquare’s managing Director Richard Seale said the future development of Barbados partly rested on the rum industry. He said the contract with Moet Hennessy could result in many indirect jobs, increased economic activity and between ten per cent and 30 per cent more exports. “This brand has the short potential to sell in the region of two to three hundred thousand cases and to become a major global brand when you want it to sell a million cases,” he added.

 

The rum, launched in T&T in 2005, is made from first press sugar cane juice and it is known as a “rhum agricole,” since it’s distilled from the cane juice instead of the more common molasses. It is called 10 Cane because it supposedly takes ten sugar cane stalks to make one bottle of the rum.

 

 

——

Blavod Wines and Spirits PLC Acquisition of Blackwood’s, Diva and Jago Brands

 

Source: WSJ

May 31st

 

Blavod Wines & Spirits plc (AIM:BES), the AIM quoted owner of premium drinks brands is pleased to announce that it has acquired the Blackwood’s, Jago’s and Diva brands.

 

Background

Blavod acquired licences to distribute these brands in May, July and October 2008 respectively from the vendor, the administrator of Shetland Spirit Company Limited (in Administration).

 

The terms of the Diva and Jago’s brands’ licences provided for four year licence terms, now expired, and following which Blavod has acquired the brands for GBP1 each from the vendor.

 

The terms of the Blackwood’s licence provided for a profit share with the vendor from the third year post acquisition through to the end of the seventh year and also gave Blavod the option to acquire the intellectual property rights at certain pre-specified dates for GBP1. The Company has reached agreement with the vendor for an early exercise of the option for the early acquisition of Blackwood’s Gin and Vodka for a cash consideration of GBP50,000. In the latest period for which audited financial information is available, the year ended 31 March 2012, the Blackwood’s licence was responsible for GBP358k of sales net of duty and GBP102k of contribution.

 

Commenting today, Don Goulding, Executive Chairman of Blavod said:

 

“We continue to focus on shareholder value through the development of owned brands of which Blackwood’s is our number one profit contributor. The acquisition of this brand together with Diva and Jago’s provides us with the platform and incentive to accelerate further growth of these brands in the UK and internationally.”

 

 

——

Christie’s withdraws suspect DRC from New York auction

 

Source: Decanter

by Chris Mercer

Thursday 30 May 2013

 

Domaine de la Romanée-Conti’s co-owner, Aubert de Villaine, has praised Christie’s for withdrawing a magnum of La Tâche 1962 from auction at the eleventh hour, due to concerns it is a fake.

 

Christie’s confirmed to Decanter.com that it has removed the magnum ‘of its own accord’ from its fine and rare wines auction taking place in New York over 30 and 31 May.

 

It is understood to have pulled the wine, which carried a top estimate of US$24,000 excluding buyer’s premium, in the past couple of days.

 

‘The lot in question has been withdrawn from sale to allow time for in-person inspection by additional third-party experts,’ said a Christie’s spokesperson.

 

‘In keeping with our multi-step process for authentication, we have already been in contact with the domaine regarding the variations in labelling that often come with wines of this era.’

 

Aubert de Villaine, co-owner of Domaine de la Romanée-Conti, welcomed the decision. While he has only seen a photo of the magnum in question, he said there were ‘justified doubts’ over some aspects of the labelling and bottle cap.

 

‘It is therefore right that Christie’s has withdrawn [this wine] from sale pending a more complete expert opinion,’ he told Decanter.com.

 

Doubts about the magnum’s authenticity were raised by lawyer and Burgundy collector Don Cornwell, via a forum post on the Wine Berserkers website.

 

Cornwell listed various errors with the label as shown in the Christie’s catalogue, including a circumflex over the ‘a’ in ‘Tâche’, which should not be there on a 1962 vintage.

 

He added that not all of the type on the label aligns, and questioned the wax bottled cap. Magnums of this vintage would normally have a foil cap.

 

He also suggested the magnum may have originated from alleged wine fraudster Rudy Kurniawan, because the defects ‘are identical’ to several of the pre-1978 DRC bottles sourced by Kurniawan – including those withdrawn from a Spectrum Wine Auctions and Vanquish sale in February 2012.

 

Kurniawan is currently awaiting trial in the US and is known as ‘Dr Conti’ for his supposed in-depth knowledge of DRC wines. De Villaine is due to testify at the trial via video-link.

 

 

——

Sonoma producers protest new labelling law

 

Source: Decanter

by Courtney Humiston in Sonoma

Thursday 30 May 2013

 

Small producers in Sonoma County are angered by new legislation requiring them to label their wines Sonoma County even if they are part of specific sub-appellations.

 

Under the new law, which comes into force on 1 January 2014, a Russian River Valley producer will to also have indicate the broader and geographically diverse ‘Sonoma County’, which spans 400,000ha and includes 15 sub-AVAs on the front label.

 

‘The danger of this is very real,’ said Scott Rich of Talisman Wines, who makes single-vineyard-designate Pinot Noir throughout Sonoma County.

 

‘Mandatory conjunctive labeling has the potential to elevate the image of a few large producers of mid-value, mass-produced wines at the expense of many smaller producers of high-value, hand-crafted wines.’

 

Sonoma County Vintners, the group responsible for pushing the legislation through, argues that conjunctive labeling will ‘build brand equity’ and ‘ensure that consumers understand where they are.’ Napa Valley enacted similar legislation in 1990.

 

‘The fact that there are those few of us making excellent appellation-specific wine in Sonoma County is exactly why the county wants to force us into the fold,’ says Jake Hawkes, a multi-generational grower and winemaker in Alexander Valley.

 

‘Our wines are pretty good and pretty expensive and I’d rather not have them associated with the ocean of dross out there.’

 

Then there is the question of redundancy. Ken Freeman of Freeman Vineyard & Winery and board president of West Sonoma Coast Vintners said, ‘We already have Sonoma Coast on the label so adding Sonoma County seems a little redundant.’

 

Rich agreed, explaining that one of his wines will have the word ‘Sonoma’ three times on the label: Sonoma Valley sub-AVA, the County and the city.

 

A recent study reported on Decanter.com found this can cause confusion for consumers.

 

The law came into force in January 2011, with a three-year voluntary ‘phase-in period’ during which wineries could choose whether or not to participate. Any wineries not in compliance after 1 January 2014 could lose their license.

 

 

——

France under fire over presidential wine sale

 

Source: France 24

May 30th

 

President Francois Hollande has been accused of selling off France’s national heritage with an auction of hundreds of bottles of fine wine from the cellars of the Elysee Palace.

 

A total of 1,200 bottles, including some of the world’s most prestigious labels, were due to go under the hammer from Thursday evening in a sale that has become symbolic of the cash-strapped government’s austerity drive.

 

Officially, the purpose of the auction is to liberate funds to rejuvenate the presidential collection but officials have also stressed that the proceeds will be invested in more modest replacements and that any surplus will be ploughed back into government coffers.

 

The conspicuous cost-cutting is in keeping with the tone of Hollande’s presidency, which has been clouded by a gloomy economic backdrop.

 

But it has not gone down well with Michel-Jack Chasseuil, one of France’s most prominent wine collectors.

 

Chasseuil has written to Hollande to express his regret over the decision to allow bottles “that are part of the heritage of our country to be sold off to billionaires from all over the world”.

 

He added: “Even if they go for fantastic sums, it will be a derisory amount in terms of the national budget and when you think about what these wines represent in the eyes of the whole world.”

 

Dealers and private collectors from all over the globe have expressed interest in the sale and high prices are anticipated because of the bottles’ novelty value.

 

The sale includes wines from every major region in France as well as a number of bottles from two of the most prestigious, and expensive, estates in the world — Bordeaux’s Chateau Petrus and Burgundy’s Domaine de la Romanee-Conti.

 

Two bottles of Petrus from the outstanding 1990 vintage have been given a guide price of between 2,200 and 2,500 euros ($2,850-$3,250), based on current valuations in the fine wine world.

 

In practice, they are likely to go for far more because of their unique provenance and because they are guaranteed to have been kept in optimum conditions for ageing in the Elysee cellars.

 

There will also be keen interest in the prices achieved by two bottles of Chateau Latour, a 1936 that is the oldest wine in the sale, and one from 1961, regarded as one of the outstanding Bordeaux vintages of the 20th century.

 

“It is a sale loaded with symbolism and I’m intrigued to see what the outcome will be,” Ghislaine Kapandji, the auctioneer in charge of the sale, told AFP.

 

The sale represents 10 percent of the 12,000 bottles currently held in the Elysee cellar, which has been regularly replenished since it was established in 1947.

 

Each bottle included in the auction has been given a special additional label certifying that they came from the “Palais de l’Elysee” with the date of the sale, which will conclude on Friday.

 

 

——

Lot18 Co-Founder Philip James Departs And Heads On A 12 Month Bike Ride Around The World

 

Source: Business Insider

Alyson Shontell

May 30, 2013

 

Last summer, Kevin Fortuna left the wine sale startup, Lot18, that he and Philip James started. Today, Philip James announced his departure from the New York company as well.

 

For the past few months, James has been helping Lot18’s new CEO, Jay Sung, get up and running. The pair have made a number of strategic decisions about the direction of the company, which have included more lay-offs, acquiring Tasting Room, and shuttering verticals that weren’t working.

 

Lot18 suffered a number of growing pains that stemmed from harsh, state-by-state regulations surrounding alcohol, particularly in New York. And like many e-commerce companies, Lot18 used a discount model to acquire customers, spending an unsustainable amount on marketing.

 

But there’s still money in the bank from the massive $30 million Series C round Lot18 raised, and James feels he’s left Sung in good shape to figure the business model out.

 

“Having hired and worked alongside Jay for the past year, I am pleased to say that the company is in great hands,” James says. “Jay is an excellent executive and I’ve always been a fan of how he thinks. I’m now focused on what’s coming next for me, and for that I’m excited, and a little nervous.”

 

Up next for the three-time entrepreneur: a two-month bike ride throughout Siberia as part of a 12-month bike ride around the world. James is a fan of extreme sports. He has climbed Mount Everest and sailed across the Atlantic.

 

Here’s the email James just sent to his team:

 

Lot18ers:

 

Friday marks my last day as an employee at Lot18. But without spoiling the ending, I’ll still be around, both in my role as a director on the board and as a consultant.

 

Obviously, things have progressed since the original conversation with Kevin when I said, “I have an idea that involves selling wine online,” and it’s been an eventful three years with many highs and lows. But ultimately, I wanted to leave you all with the following.

 

I was taught that it’s a leader’s job to do three things:

 

– Hire and retain talent

 

What can I say here? You guys are the killer team. From Jay on down, I’m proud to be a part of this organization. From our wine expertise to our tech chops to the marketing group that joined a year ago, I’d put us up against any company out there.

 

– Set company strategy

 

Ignoring the overhyped word “pivot,” Lot18 has evolved considerably since it first began offering US wines via flash sale. From centralizing shipping to improving customer service to leveraging an incredibly complex network in order to provide international wines (and to ensure the customer could receive wines from different producers in the same box), we’ve forged new paths, raised hackles and worked hard to delight our members. More recently, the acquisition of Tasting Room and the acquisition of retail licenses prove that we’re thinking on our feet, we’re nimble and we’re ready to adapt to changing regulations and customer demand.  

 

– Ensure the company has money in the bank

 

We did a great job raising money through the A, B and C rounds. But most importantly, when most companies are raising money every year, we’re 18 months out from our last fundraising round and still have plenty of capital in the bank. The recent, difficult but necessary, decisions have further strengthened our position here.

 

Those three things, important as they are, live within an all-encompassing rule many of you know that I tend to work and play by, which is, “Leave something in a better state than you found it.” Not only do I believe this is the case with the company, but it’s the adage that’s guiding the somewhat unusual – yet appropriate – plan I have next.

 

As you know, I spend a lot of time outdoors, and have undertaken some major expeditions in the past. Starting in June, I’ll be riding my motorcycle around the world in order to raise money for Wine to Water (http://winetowater.org/), a charity that supports water projects in 15 countries around the world.

 

The support of water- and famine-focused charities has been in Lot18’s blood since day one. From Kevin’s continued involvement in Concern Worldwide to Lot18’s support of Charity: Water, I, and we, have cared about helping those most in need.   

 

I’ll travel west, first across the United States and into Canada. From there I’ll ship my bike to Russia, ride across Siberia during its brief summer, cross Central Asia and the Celestial Mountains, then enter Eastern Europe. After a brief recovery there, I’ll head south to Tangiers and across the Sahara before I follow the west coast of Africa down to Cape Town. This will be an incredibly hard journey covering close to 50,000 kilometers (or more than 30,000 miles to many of you), covering over 50 countries. I’ll visit some of the most desolate and destitute areas of the world to raise awareness for and assist in providing the aid these places require, but also to inform and inspire me on one or more of the entrepreneurial endeavors I hope to take on after my journey.

 

You’ll be able to follow me at my expedition blog wineandwater.org, and on that page you can donate to Wine to Water as well. 100% of all proceeds raised will go directly to Wine to Water. Please know that as little as $0.10 can provide clean water to one person for a year. It’s easy to make a difference, and I hope that in this way you can share in the excitement of this journey.

 

I have so many friends at Lot18, and I’m ever so keen to see how each of you grows over the coming years.

 

Onward and thank you all,

 

Philip

 

 

——

Bordeaux’s Philosopher Vigneron

 

Source: WSJ

By WILL LYONS

May 30th

 

THE GRAPE ARGUMENT Bordeaux’s François Mitjaville is adamant that making wine is simply farming.

 

TO SPEND A FEW HOURS in the company of Bordeaux winemaker François Mitjaville is to touch on philosophy, the concept of civilization, the language of flavors, the brushwork of Picasso and the simplicity of terroir.

 

His style is like no other. Visitors to his small château, Tertre Rôteboeuf, high above the slopes of Saint-Laurent, just outside of Saint-Émilion, are advised to make it their last visit of the day. If they don’t, they will almost certainly miss their next appointment. A quick, 20-minute visit can easily stretch into the night as Mr. Mitjaville scurries around, pipette in hand, holding court and pouring wines from his many barrels.

 

But those who make the journey almost always return surprised by the man, his wines and their distinctive character.

 

Mr. Mitjaville, 65, wasn’t born into a winemaking dynasty. He grew up in Paris and it wasn’t until he was in his late 20s that he had the opportunity to take over the then-failing Château de Tertre. Before that he worked in his wife’s family’s wine-haulage business-and perhaps it is this foundation that keeps him grounded. For, despite his philosophical bent, Mr. Mitjaville is adamant that making wine is simply farming.

 

Good terroir, he argues, isn’t an intellectual concept-it is simply a place where the flavors of the fruit produced from the vine are better; with wine it is grapes but, he says, we could easily be talking about potatoes. “With wine, we are in front of a natural produce and when we are in front of a natural produce you don’t try and paint Guernica,” he says. “You don’t choose the colors of your painting; you don’t choose the flavor of your fruit. You are stupid if you think I am a creator.”

 

Perhaps so, but anyone who has come across his wines will tell you that they belie their provenance. Although they are made with Merlot and Cabernet Franc, the smell is evocative of red Burgundy-a wine created from Pinot Noir. One scribbles down notes of sweet cherry, spice, dried figs, sometimes a floral element and sometimes tobacco. Texturally, they are very light, easy to digest and-dare I say it-dangerously easy to drink. It isn’t surprising that in wine circles Mr. Mitjaville retains a cult following.

 

“Wine has not to be impressive, it has to be emotional.”

 

A great wine, he says, is something civilized. By this he means a wine that invites you to drink it. He rails against the modern practice of making wine that is big, massively extracted with fruit and high alcohol. For Mr. Mitjaville, a wine should have concentration of flavor but in essence it should be delicate, reflecting the subtleties of the land where it is grown.

 

To talk about the strength, the power, something impressive, is to miss the point. “All these modern words pass by the real beauty of the flavors,” he says. “Wine has not to be impressive, it has to be emotional; it has to make you dream.”

 

Mark Savage, who has been importing Château Tertre Rôteboeuf since the late 1970s, says part of Mr. Mitjaville’s secret is minute attention to detail and a lot of man-hours per vine. This, and an understanding of the land he works. Which means it is a good wine to buy in difficult vintages-as Mr. Mitjaville says: “Good terroir jumps over the difficulties of the climate.”

 

 

——

If Only the Grapes Were the Whole Story

 

Source: New York Times

By ERIC ASIMOV

May 30, 2013

 

Wine has been described as the perfect beverage because the grapes contain all the ingredients necessary to create their transformation. Put grapes in a vat and over time, the yeasts coating the skins set alchemy in motion, converting the sugar in the juice into alcohol.

 

The producers who take part in RAW are required to list any additives and processing techniques they have used in their wines.

 

It was just this sort of unbidden fermentation that inspired humans so long ago to spend the next few millenniums improving their methods of winemaking.

 

A few wines are still made in this way, or at least in approximation, with no other ingredients except the possible addition of sulfur dioxide, which has been used for eons as a stabilizer and preservative. Yet it’s no secret that many wines (most, in fact) include a lot more than grapes, yeast and sulfur. The list in some cases can be staggering.

 

Forget about the often poisonous chemicals used in the vineyards, which can leave residue on the grapes. In the winery alone, before fermentation even begins, enzymes may be added to speed up the removal of solid particles from the juice, to amplify desirable aromas while eliminating disagreeable ones, to intensify the color of red wines and to clarify the color of whites.

 

It doesn’t stop there. Other additives can be used to enhance a wine’s texture, to add or subtract tannins or simply to adjust quality. Winemakers can select specific yeasts and special nutrients to keep those yeasts working. They can add oak extracts for flavor and further tannin adjustment, and compounds derived from grape juice to fix color, texture and body. They can add sugar to lengthen the fermentation, increasing the alcohol content; add acid if it’s lacking, add water if the alcohol level is too high. Or they can send the wine through a reverse osmosis machine or other heavy equipment to diminish the alcohol and eliminate other undesirable traits, like volatile acidity.

 

For all of its natural, pastoral connotations, wine can very much be a manufactured product, processed to achieve a preconceived notion of how it should feel, smell and taste, and then rolled off the assembly line, year after year, as consistent and denatured as a potato chip or fast-food burger.

 

Yet we pay little attention to wine’s added ingredients, even as we have become hyper-conscious about what we eat. Twenty years ago, many Americans may have enjoyed food indiscriminately, but now they weigh the nutritional, environmental, humanitarian, aesthetic and even political consequences of what they cook and consume. Isn’t it time to devote the same careful attention to the wine we drink?

 

It’s no simple task. Unlike processed foods, wine is not required to have its ingredients listed on the label. This contributes to the belief that any wine is elemental, like fruits, vegetables and meats, and can’t be broken down into constituent parts. That’s far from the truth.

 

“It is very surprising how many discerning foodies will drink mass-produced, highly processed wines without batting an eyelid,” Isabelle Legeron, an educator and consultant who holds the rare title master of wine, wrote in an e-mail. “They just haven’t engaged with wine in the same way, yet.”

 

For the last two years, Ms. Legeron has held RAW, a fair in London that brings together producers of artisanal and natural wines with others in the trade and the public. All producers who take part are required to list any additives and processing techniques they have used.

 

“With RAW, we are really trying to raise awareness about transparency,” she said. “We want to prompt people to ask questions.”

 

The first question might be: Why are wineries so reluctant to document what does into their wines? Ingredient labeling is voluntary, and very few wineries have stepped up. Bonny Doon Vineyard, Shinn Estate Vineyards and Ridge Vineyards deserve applause as notable exceptions.

 

Many wineries try to explain away their reluctance by arguing that consumers will be confused by long lists of ingredients, or even a short list of traditional but unexpected substances that have been used in winemaking for centuries. For example, artisanal producers who disdain adding enzymes may still try to clarify their wines with egg whites or isinglass, which is derived from fish bladders. Certainly vegans might want to know that information.

 

The fact is, some consumers make conscious decisions not to buy products when they see what goes into making them. I don’t want added sweeteners pervading the groceries I buy, for example. I love peanut butter, but won’t buy it if it contains anything more than peanuts and salt. Don’t all consumers deserve the same opportunity to make informed, considered judgments about wine?

 

At the same time, other consumers – the vast majority – continue to buy processed foods regardless of mysterious ingredients. They are motivated by costs, convenience and sensory gratification, or maybe they just don’t care. No doubt the same will be true with wine.

 

It’s not apparent whether additives in wine pose public-health risks. Nonetheless, if we want foods that are minimally processed, authentic expressions of what they purport to be (like cheese rather than processed cheese), then we want to be able to distinguish between wines that are relatively unmanipulated and those that are industrial products.

 

Most wineries have no interest in full disclosure. Just as with food manufacturers, they will have to be dragged into some form of honest representation of their product. Sadly, the responsibility is left largely to consumers to monitor what they buy and drink.

 

As a first step, it helps to think of wine as food. Concerns about where food comes from and how it’s grown, processed or raised ought to be extended to wine. If we ourselves don’t set standards for quality and authenticity, who will?

 

 

——

House broker raises concerns over Tesco’s recovery

 

Source: FT

By Andrea Felsted, Senior Retail Correspondent

May 30th

 

Concerns are rising that Tesco’s nascent recovery in the UK is stalling, after its house broker said it expected domestic sales to start falling again.

 

JPMorgan Cazenove, joint broker to Tesco, on Thursday forecast a 0.6 per cent decline in UK sales from stores open at least a year in the three months to May 25. Other analysts with a strong record of forecasting developments at Tesco estimate the decline at up to 1 per cent.

 

In the three months to February 23, Tesco’s like-for-like sales, excluding fuel and VAT rose 0.5 per cent.

 

Shares in Tesco, which in April reported the biggest decline in profits in its history, fell 5 3/4p, or 1.5 per cent, to 367 ¼ p, in a market up 0.5 per cent.

 

The stalling sales growth comes at a delicate time for Tesco, which last year committed £1bn to its operations in the UK – which still accounts for about two-thirds of sales and profits – after its first profit warning in 20 years in January 2012. It also underlines the perilous state of UK consumer demand, with Tesco taking about £1 in every £8 spent on shopping in the UK. Recent retail figures from the CBI were also weak.

 

Jaime Vazquez, analyst at JPMorgan Cazenove, said the conditions in the UK grocery sector “do not bode well for the industry and, as a result, for Tesco”.

 

He said Tesco’s price matching scheme, together with an anticipated pick-up in sales as the horse meat scandal subsided, had been expected to improve sales.

 

As well as the impact of the horsemeat scandal, Tesco has also been grappling with weak sales of non-food items. It is revamping this area, and starting to sell more upmarket products to try to compete more effectively with rivals such as John Lewis.

 

Mr Vazquez said the company was planning a relaunch of its non-food range this summer and autumn.

 

As well as declining sales in the UK, JPMorgan Cazenove is also forecasting a 5 per cent decline in like-or-like sales in central Europe, and a 4 per cent decline in Asia, where Tesco is still suffering from restrictions on opening hours in Korea, and difficult conditions in China.

 

The FT reported earlier this month that Tesco was eyeing a joint venture in China .

 

 

——

Costco reaps solid Q3

 

Source: RT

By Vivian Gomez

May 30, 2013

 

A $62 million tax benefit in the second quarter, alongside a portion of a special cash dividend Costco received in December 2012, helped bolster the company’s net income for the first 36 weeks of fiscal 2013, ended May 12.

 

Costco’s net income for the quarter was $459 million, compared to $386 million for the same period last year. The company reported net sales of $24 billion for the third quarter, an 8% increase from $22 billion for the same period last year. Net sales for the first 36 weeks were $71 billion, likewise up 8% from $66 billion last year.

 

Costco currently operates 627 warehouses, including 449 in the United States and Puerto Rico, 85 in Canada, 33 in Mexico, 24 in the United Kingdom, 15 in Japan, 9 in Taiwan, 9 in Korea and 3 in Australia.

 

The company plans to open up to an additional nine new warehouses prior to the end of its fiscal year on September 1. Costco also operates e-commerce websites in the U.S., U.K. and Canada.

 

 

——

Ex-Microsoft manager plans to create first U.S. marijuana brand

 

Source: Reuters

By Jonathan Kaminsky

Thu, May 30 2013

 

A former Microsoft executive plans to create the first U.S. national marijuana brand, with cannabis he hopes to eventually import legally from Mexico, and said he was kicking off his business by acquiring medical pot dispensaries in three U.S. states.

 

Jamen Shively, a former Microsoft corporate strategy manager, said he envisions his Seattle-based enterprise becoming the leader in both recreational and medical cannabis – much like Starbucks is the dominant name in coffee, he said.

 

Shively, 45, whose six years at Microsoft ended in 2009, said he was soliciting investors for $10 million in start-up money.

 

The use, sale and possession of marijuana remains illegal in the United States under federal law. Two U.S. states have, however, legalized recreational marijuana use and are among 18 states that allow it for medical use.

 

“It’s a giant market in search of a brand,” Shively said of the marijuana industry. “We would be happy if we get 40 percent of it worldwide.”

 

A 2005 United Nations report estimated the global marijuana trade to be valued at $142 billion. here

 

Washington state and Colorado became the first two U.S. states to legalize recreational marijuana when voters approved legalization in November.

 

Shively laid out his plans, along with his vision for a future in which marijuana will be imported from Mexico, at a Thursday news conference in downtown Seattle.

 

Joining him was former Mexican President Vicente Fox, a longtime Shively acquaintance who has been an advocate of decriminalizing marijuana. Fox said he was there to show his support for Shively’s company but has no financial stake in it.

 

“What a difference it makes to have Jamen here sitting at my side instead of Chapo Guzman,” said Fox, referring to the fact he would rather see Shively selling marijuana legally than the Mexican drug kingpin selling it illegally. “This is the story that has begun to be written here.”

 

Shively told Reuters he hoped Fox would serve an advisory role in his enterprise, dubbed Diego Pellicer after Shively’s hemp-producing great grandfather.

 

The sale of cannabis or marijuana remains illegal in much of the world although countries mainly in Europe and the Americas have decriminalized the possession of small quantities of it. A larger number of countries have decriminalized or legalized cannabis for medical use.

 

SKEPTICISM

 

Shively acknowledges that his business plans conflict with U.S. federal law and are complicated by regulations in both Washington state and Colorado. He said he is interested in buying dispensaries that comply with local and state rules and are less likely to attract the scrutiny of authorities.

 

“If they want to come talk to me, I’ll be delighted to meet with them,” he said of federal officials. “I’ll tell them everything that we’re doing and show them all our books.”

 

Washington state’s marijuana consultant, Mark Kleiman, said he was skeptical of Shively’s plans, and feared that the businessman is seeking to profit off others’ addiction.

 

“It’s very hard for me to understand why anybody seriously interested in being in the marijuana business, which after all is against the federal law, would so publicly announce his conspiracy to break that law,” said Kleiman, a professor of public policy at the University of California, Los Angeles.

 

Emily Langlie, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Seattle, referred questions to the Department of Justice headquarters. Department officials did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

 

Washington state Representative Reuven Carlyle, a Seattle Democrat, sees promise in Shively’s initiative. Any industry emerging from the shadows will inevitably undergo consolidation – and thereby simplify the task of regulators, he said.

 

“The fact that an entrepreneur is publicly pushing the envelope around a branding and value-based pricing opportunity, I would say that’s in the water in Seattle,” said Carlyle, chairman of the House Finance Committee. “That’s in our DNA … We could have predicted that as much as the rain.”

 

Shively said he has already acquired the rights to the Northwest Patient Resource Center, a medical marijuana operation that includes two Seattle store fronts. He added that he was close to acquiring another dispensary in Colorado, as well as two more each in Washington state and California, with the owners given the option to retain a stake in their businesses.

 

“We’ve created the first risk-mitigated vehicles for investing directly in this business opportunity,” he said.

 

Shively said he ultimately plans to create separate medical and recreational-use marijuana brands. Shively said he also plans to launch a study of the effectiveness of concentrated cannabis oil in the treatment of cancer and other illnesses.

 

 

——

Texas: High spirits: Texas liquor distillers get OK to sell on site

 

Texas liquor distillers such as Tito’s Handmade Vodka and Ranger Creek Brewing & Distillery will be able to sell their wares on site after the governor signed Senate Bill 905 into law.

 

Source: Austin Business Journal

James Jeffrey

May 30th

 

Liquor distillers in Texas will be able to sell their wares on site thanks to a bill signed into law by the governor.

 

Senate Bill 905 – authored by State Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio – enables a distiller’s and rectifier’s permit holder to sell distilled spirits to consumers for consumption on the permitted premises and off the property.

 

Stakeholders were consulted during work sessions in 2012 to formulate effective legislation and included the likes of Austin’s Tito’s Handmade Vodka and rum-making Treaty Oak Distillery, and San Antonio’s whiskey-making Ranger Creek Brewing & Distillery.

 

Van de Putte, along with other lawmakers, also championed legislation to provide similar opportunities to craft beer brewers.

 

Another bill of Van de Putte’s, SB 642, also signed into law, will permit a distiller’s and rectifier’s permit holder to sell bulk alcohol to holders of industrial permits. Previously, the holder of an industrial permit could only buy distilled spirits at retail establishments for use in food production.

 

SB 652, again by Van de Putte and currently waiting for the governor’s signature, aims to allow the transfer of alcoholic beverages for manufacturing purposes between certain permit and license holders. Under current law, a distillery may only buy bulk distilled spirits from out-of-state distilleries

Our Website

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Try From Your Mobile Phone!

Like Us On Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/franklinliquorsMA

Follow Us On Twitter

http://www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

All Our Social Media

 

Liquor Industry News 5-29-13

May 29, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Wednesday May 29th 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic ROOT Day

 

TTB Issues Guidelines for Voluntary Serving Facts Statements

 

Source: TTB

May 28th

 

On May 28, 2013, the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) issued a ruling (Ruling 2013-2) that allows alcohol beverage industry members to provide consumers with nutritional information about their products and provides guidelines to ensure that the information is presented in a consistent and non-misleading manner.

 

The Federal Alcohol Administration Act provides for regulation of the labeling and advertising of distilled spirits, wine, and malt beverages to prevent consumer deception, to provide consumers with adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product, and to prohibit false or misleading statements.

 

The ruling allows “Serving Facts” statements that include the serving size, the number of servings per container, the number of calories, and the number of grams of carbohydrates, protein, and fat per serving. Additionally, Serving Facts statements may include information about the alcohol content of the product as a percentage of alcohol by volume and may also include a statement of the fluid ounces of pure ethyl alcohol per serving.

Industry members will not need to apply for new label approval to add a Serving Facts statement if it conforms to the examples contained in the ruling.

 

TTB is providing this interim guidance on the use of optional Serving Facts statements on labels and in advertisements pending the completion of rulemaking on this matter.

 

The Ruling can be found at http://www.ttb.gov/rulings/2013-2.pdf

 

For more information regarding alcohol beverage labeling requirements, please visit our website at www.ttb.gov.

 

 

——

Drunk in a puff of smoke: Worrying new trend sees diet-conscious drinkers INHALE alcohol to avoid empty calories

 

Source: Daily Mail

By Sadie Whitelocks

28 May 2013

 

Diet-conscious drinkers who want to get drunk without consuming empty calories are turning to a dangerous method that involves pouring alcohol over dry ice so the vapors can be inhaled.

 

Broderic Allen from North Texas, who lost 80 pounds by ‘smoking’ liquor instead of drinking it, explained to Fox5 that he can have his ‘cake and eat it.’

 

However, doctors warn the technique can have potentially fatal consequences as it sends larger and purer doses of alcohol to the brain by bypassing the liver and other organs.

 

Dr Lawrence Pohl, medical director of the Mission Valley Medical Clinic in San Diego, California, describes it as a ‘crazy’ fad that ‘makes no sense’.

 

‘The concern is it can go to the bloodstream quickly, to the brain quickly, to the lungs,’ he said, highlighting the dangers.

 

‘It’s toxic to the lungs and it could be a real concern and potentially have serious side effects.’

 

‘It can have a toxic effect . . . Just imagine pouring alcohol in your lungs, it’s just horrible’

 

Dr Walter Gaman, who practices family medicine in the Texas area, also notes the negative impact on the body.

 

‘The dry ice is so cold, you’re not going to be able to humidify it,’ he told KCTV5.

 

Research shows that inhaling liquor causes rapid intoxication and impairment and is more likely to lead to substance abuse.

 

Addiction expert, Dr Paul Hokemeyer told MailOnline: ‘Such extreme measures strongly suggest the presence of a serious substance abuse disorder.

 

‘In addition to the obvious physical risks this trend presents, it draws into question their judgment and impulse control.’

 

Despite the health warnings, Mr Allen said he has no plans to stop using the dry ice method. He says he can still taste the liquor and wants to maintain his slim physique.

 

‘I feel like anything in excess is going to be bad for you.’ he said. ‘People are going to take it and turn into something it’s not . . . If you lose the weight you want to keep it off.’

 

Backing the trend for ‘smoking’ alcohol, last December a $35 contraption called the Vaportini, which heats alcohol and allows it to be inhaled, hit the market.

 

Invented by Chicago resident Julie Palmer, the simple glass and metal device is offered as a novelty method to consume drinks at the bar she owns in the Windy City, Red Kiva.

 

Dr Thomas Greenfield, center director at the National Alcohol Research Center in Emeryville, California, said he was most concerned about young people who might feel pressured into to experimenting with different methods of alcohol consumption.

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2332111/Drunk-puff-smoke-Worrying-new-trend-sees-diet-conscious-drinkers-INHALE-alcohol-avoid-calories.html#ixzz2UfK0YYmy

 

 

——

Fewer tobacco products, but not alcohol, in movies

 

Source: Reuters

By Genevra Pittman

Tue, May 28 2013

 

Movie characters smoke less since 1998 regulations that stopped tobacco companies from buying on-screen brand placements, according to a new study.

 

But at the same time, researchers found the number of alcohol brand appearances has increased in popular movies rated PG-13 and below, and the amount of time characters spend drinking hasn’t changed.

 

“These results are of great concern,” said David Jernigan, head of the Center on Alcohol Marketing and Youth at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

 

“In movie reality, it seems like every occasion is right for a drink,” said Jernigan, who wasn’t involved in the new study. And that suggests to young viewers that alcohol is much more common than is actually the case, he said.

 

“This whole conversation is about normalization of alcohol use,” Jernigan told Reuters Health. “Young people are particularly vulnerable to the message that drinking is everywhere.”

 

For the new study, researchers watched the top 100 box office releases of each year between 1996 and 2009 and recorded when a movie character was shown using or handling tobacco or alcohol, and when a particular brand was pictured.

 

In all, Elaina Bergamini from the Norris Cotton Cancer Center in Lebanon, New Hampshire, and her colleagues recorded 500 tobacco and 2,433 alcohol brand placements in all films combined.

 

The number of tobacco brand appearances ranged from 54 to 98 per year before 2000, then declined to 22 per year after 2006. The amount of time characters were shown using tobacco also dropped over time in both youth and adult movies.

 

That suggests the 1998 regulation, part of the Master Settlement Agreement between tobacco companies and U.S. states, successfully stopped the tobacco industry from paying for its products to be shown on screen, the study team wrote in JAMA Pediatrics.

 

On the other hand, alcohol brand appearances in youth-rated movies, in particular, increased from 80 to 145 per year during the study period.

 

Budweiser was the most common alcohol brand shown in films. Parent company Anheuser Busch did not comment before press time.

 

Jernigan said that because there’s unlikely to be a similar settlement for the beverage industry, any regulation on product placement would have to come from the companies themselves or from the movie industry.

 

For example, some organizations have suggested movies showing drinking should automatically be rated R.

 

Concern stems from research tying on-screen smoking and drinking to more of that behavior among youth who watch those movies.

 

“Children who see smoking in the movies are more likely to initiate smoking,” Bergamini told Reuters Health. “I think there is some concern that that may hold true for alcohol as well.”

 

“The notorious thing you find in movies and in TV is heavy drinking without consequences,” Jernigan said. “It leaves it up to parents to tell the consequences story.”

 

 

——

U.S. Economic Confidence Holds Steady at High Level

 

Economic Confidence Index score of -6 on par with previous week’s score of -5

 

Source: Gallup

by Alyssa Brown

May 28th

 

Gallup’s U.S. Economic Confidence Index was -6 last week, staying near the five-year weekly high of -5 from the prior week. The recent level is the most upbeat U.S. consumers have been since Gallup began tracking U.S. economic confidence daily in 2008.

 

Gallup’s Economic Confidence Index is based on Americans’ ratings of current economic conditions in the United States as well as their assessments of whether the economy is getting better or worse. The index has not crossed into positive territory since Gallup began Daily tracking of economic confidence in January 2008. Gallup measured Americans’ confidence in the economy on a monthly basis from 2001 to 2007, and on an occasional basis prior to that, though methodological differences between the tracking and nontracking surveys do not allow for precise comparisons of the results from each. Nonetheless, the last time the index was in net positive territory was from late 2006 through early 2007.

 

Looking at the outlook component of the index, Americans’ net rating of the economy’s direction dipped to -1 last week after crossing into positive territory the prior week — which was the first time Americans’ weekly net economic outlook had been positive in more than five years of Daily tracking. Last week, 47% of Americans said the economy was getting better and 48% said it was getting worse.

 

Americans’ net assessments of current economic conditions, at -11 last week, remain in negative territory, but are as positive as they have been since early 2008. The current reading reflects 21% saying current economic conditions are excellent or good and 32% saying they are poor.

 

Implications

 

Gallup’s Economic Confidence Index has been edging closer to positive territory in recent weeks after residing in negative territory for more than six years. There are multiple factors that may have contributed to this recovery in Americans’ confidence in the economy this year, including surging U.S. stock prices, higher housing prices, lower gas prices, and positive employment news. These positive signs apparently were enough to help Americans’ confidence in the economy rebound quickly after the fiscal cliff and budget sequestration debates.

 

While Americans’ confidence in the economy has been stronger so far this year than in prior years, there are political and economic events in the months ahead that will likely test Americans’ higher levels of confidence. More federal agencies are announcing and implementing their plans to furlough employees in response to automatic sequestration budget cuts, which could negatively affect Americans’ views of their personal finances and the overall U.S. economy. The Federal Reserve may cut back its bond buying program or make other policy changes, which could cause U.S. stock prices to slip. There may also be a contentious debate in Washington this summer or fall over raising the debt limit, with Republicans expected to demand spending cuts as part of a deal to raise the debt ceiling.

 

Additionally, business owners may decrease hiring and let more employees go in anticipation of health insurance requirements as part of the Affordable Care Act, which also could negatively affect Americans’ confidence in the economy.

 

Gallup’s Daily tracking of U.S. economic confidence will show whether Americans’ confidence will be shaken as a result of these challenges or whether the positive momentum will continue.

 

 

——

Pernod Plans to Expand in China Despite Government Crackdown

 

Source: WSJ

By LAURIE BURKITT

May 28th

 

Pernod Ricard SA RI.FR -0.90% executives have a plan to battle a slowing Chinese economy in which high-end spirits are taking a beating: expand anyway.

 

China is Pernod’s second-largest market by profit outside the U.S. Above, a Chivas billboard in Shanghai.

 

The French maker of whiskey brands such as Chivas and cognacs including Martell is opening members-only clubs in China, cozying up to wealthy individuals and hosting gatherings of 10 or fewer VIP customers to win more drinkers of Champagne, cognac, wine, whiskey and vodka, executives said Tuesday at an analysts conference in Beijing.

 

“The goal is to boost our profile as an ultraprestige player,” said Con Constandis, Pernod Ricard’s managing director for China. The company took around 70 VIPs to an annual yachting event last month at southern China’s Hainan Island for tastings and fine dining, he said.

 

Expanding the market for pricey spirits comes as China’s government has scaled back government-sponsored banquets and gift giving, which for years had propelled sales of high-end spirits. The crackdown has taken a toll on domestic makers of China’s white spirit baijiu, with sales falling as much as 30%.

 

Foreign companies have taken a hit, too. Rémy Cointreau SA, RCO.FR -0.79% which makes Rémy Martin cognac, last month reported that Asia sales growth was slower during the Lunar New Year period compared with a year earlier, citing reduced corporate gift giving in China.

 

Overall spirit volume in China is expected to rise an average of 16% a year through 2016, down from 21% growth between 2006 and 2011, according to data tracker Euromonitor International.

 

Mr. Constandis said the government’s efforts are challenging the skyrocketing growth and high profits that many spirits companies had fetched in China. Pernod’s sales of high-end scotch fell during the Lunar New Year, he said on the sideline of the conference.

 

Yet Pernod isn’t pulling back on its effort to sell more ultraprestige spirits, such as the $3,000 cognac L’Or de Jean Martell and Ballantine’s 40-year-old whiskey, which sells for more than $300 a bottle.

 

Mr. Constandis likened the Chinese government’s efforts to scolding loud teenagers at a party. “They’ll settle down for a while, but you’re not going to stop them,” he said. Pernod will continue to focus on high-wealth and other affluent individuals, he said.

 

China is an important component of Pernod’s growth strategy and is the company’s second-largest market by profit outside the U.S. Pernod also is targeting Chinese travelers, opening retail outlets in airports and expanding its presence in duty-free shops. Executives also plan to create more in-flight experiences, such as Pernod’s Korean Air 003490.SE +1.37% Absolut bar, which offers cocktails mixed with the company’s Absolut vodka.

 

To revive scotch sales, Pernod plans to expand marketing and sales channels to increase its presence in restaurants and karaoke bars, which are more casual and visited more frequently by female consumers than where Pernod typically sells the spirit. The distiller sees potential in building its female base in China and throughout Asia, Mr. Constandis said.

 

Some analysts have expressed skepticism about the bullish stance of some luxury companies as other competitors pull back. Yet the thirst for luxury products hasn’t dropped significantly and continues to increase within the middle class, said Aaron Fischer, analyst at brokerage CLSA Asia-Pacific Markets.

 

Pernod is expanding rapidly across Asia, particularly in markets such as Vietnam and India. Premium Western-style spirits and wine, the most aspirational segment, represents only 3% of the market in Asia, according to Pernod.

 

 

——

Brown-Forman Corp. (BF__B): 4Q FY13 Preview: Slightly below consensus on higher reinvestment

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

May 28th

 

INVESTMENT LIST MEMBERSHIP: Americas Sell List

COVERAGE VIEW: NEUTRAL

 

What’s changed

BF_B reports 4Q and FY13 earnings before market open on Wednesday June 5. Our EPS estimate stands at $0.43 for 4Q, $0.03 below consensus of $0.46 that has a wide range ($0.41-$0.52). We are generally in line for sales, but below consensus on EPS due mostly to greater spending expectations and FX. We are raising our estimates 1-2% on better gross margins and a lower tax rate assumption.

 

Implications

We continue to believe BFB will be a relative laggard as it is trading at a peak absolute and relative multiple. We believe our 10-11% EPS growth is very achievable for BFB, but we believe this growth does not justify a 16.5X NTM EV/EBITDA multiple, which is a 20-25% premium to its spirits peers.

 

We are below consensus for 4Q, in part due to reinvestment – We are near the high end of BFB guidance for the year ($2.66 vs. guidance of $2.60-$2.68), but believe consensus at $2.69 may not be reached as BFB invests back into advertising more heavily. We still expect very strong sales growth in 4Q of 9% which is well balanced between 5.5% volume and 3.5% price/mix.

 

Forecasting 10-11% EPS growth in FY14 – Our estimates reflect 10.3% EPS growth in FY14 to an EPS of $2.93 vs. consensus expectations of 11.2% growth to $2.98. We expect another solid year of 6% volume growth and 2% price/mix, but do not expect the same level of pricing and margin step up as we had in FY13. We do not anticipate any major new innovations on Jack Daniels as we believe BFB will remain cautious on not diluting brand equity.

 

Valuation

Our 12-mo $67 EV/EBITDA based price target is unchanged.

 

Key risks

Key risks include better volume/pricing, spirit industry acceleration, margin improvement.

 

 

——

Japan’s Suntory Beverage & Food to List on Tokyo Bourse Jul 3

 

Source: WSJ

By Hiroyuki Kachi

May 29th

 

Suntory Beverage & Food Ltd. has received approval to list on the Tokyo Stock Exchange on July 3, in a $4.7-billion initial public offering aimed at raising funds for outbound M&A activity to power its growth.

 

The Tokyo bourse said Wednesday that the beverage giant, which bottles and distributes PepsiCo Inc. products in Japan, will offer 93 million newly issued shares to the public, comprising 33.5 million shares for domestic investors and 59.5 million shares for overseas investors. Suntory Beverage & Food, a key unit of Suntory Holdings Ltd., racks up more than 50% of Suntory Holdings’ group revenue.

 

Suntory Holdings will also offer 26 million shares it currently holds in Suntory Beverage & Food to the public. The holding company currently owns all the shares of its beverage unit. An additional offering of up to 6.2 million existing shares is expected under an over-allotment arrangement in case of stronger-than-expected demand.

 

The indicative price of Y3,800 tentatively set by Suntory brings the value of the IPO to up to Y475.76 billion ($4.7 billion) and the issue’s market capitalization to Y1.174 trillion.

 

Among other companies in the sector, Kirin Holdings Co. (2503.TO) has a market value of Y1.661 trillion and Asahi Group Holdings Ltd. (2502.TO) a market value of Y1.208 trillion.

 

The Osaka-based Suntory Holdings, about 90%-held by its founding family, has garnered fame for its whiskey brands, but has been diversifying into food- and beverage-related fields to expand its sources of revenue.

 

Suntory beverage and food unit also owns European soft-drinks company Orangina and New Zealand-based Frucor Group.

 

 

——

‘Transcendent spirit’ Bacardi risks losing lead in global rum sales

 

Source: Beverage Daily

May 28th

 

Bacardi is in danger of losing its ‘coveted position’ as the world’s bestselling rum to Philippines rum brand Tanduay, according to a new survey of spirits brands sales in 2012.

 

http://www.beveragedaily.com/Markets/Transcendent-spirit-Bacardi-risks-losing-lead-in-global-rum-sales

 

 

——

USL to sell Scottish whiskey distiller Invergordon

 

Source: DBR

29 May 2013

 

United Spirits Limited (USL), an Indian spirits company, is likely to sell its Scottish grain whiskey distillery Invergordon, which it acquired under $1.18bn Whyte & Mackay acquisition in 2007.

 

Invergordon has an annual production capacity of 40 million liters.

 

However, the Office of Fair Trade in UK, after reviewing the recent acquisition of USL by Diageo, raised concerns that the combined grain whiskey distillation would violate competition laws, reported The Times of India.

 

Diageo already owns Cameronbridge, which has an annual capacity of 140 million liters, besides owning a 50% stake in North British Distillery, which has 60 million-liter capacity.

 

Whyte & Mackay owns five distilleries in Scotland, including Dalmore, Old Fettercairn, Isle of Jura, Tamnavulin and Invergordon.

 

Among these distilleries, only Invergordon is a grain whiskey distillery, while others are malt distilleries.

 

According to drinks industry analysts, Diageo might start divesting Whyte & Mackay brands, which are against the long-term interests of the company.

 

 

——

DOJ Shows Flexibility In Structural Fix For InBev, Modelo

 

Source: Law360

Peter Love

May 28, 2013

 

The U.S. Department of Justice has reached a settlement with Anheuser-Busch InBev and Grupo Modelo SAB de CV, requiring AB InBev to divest Modelo’s entire U.S. business to Constellation Brands Inc. The consent decree provides for a straightforward structural fix. AB InBev has agreed to sell Modelo’s newest Piedras Negras brewery and Modelo’s interest in Crown, its U.S. distribution joint venture with Constellation. AB InBev also will sell to Constellation (or to some other divestiture buyer if the deal with Constellation falls through) perpetual and exclusive licenses to the Modelo brands for distribution and sale in the United States. Coming after the U.S. Department of Justice’s rejection of a softer remedy proposed by AB InBev, the final settlement reflects the DOJ’s continued reliance on structural remedies as the default fix for horizontal mergers that may lessen competition.

 

Background

 

On Jan. 31, the DOJ filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in federal district court in Washington, D.C., challenging AB InBev’s $20 billion proposed acquisition of the remaining 50 percent interest in Modelo, the producer of Corona Extra, the best-selling imported beer in the United States. Shortly after the DOJ filed its lawsuit, AB InBev reached a new $4.75 billion deal that gives Constellation full ownership of Crown, the Piedras Negras brewery in Mexico, and perpetual licenses to Modelo’s brands. The announced settlement is “substantially in line” with this revised agreement.

 

The key elements of the remedy – AB InBev agreeing to sell to Constellation the Piedras Negras brewery, its interest in Crown, and perpetual and exclusive licenses to the Modelo brands in the United States – clearly are both more substantial and more “structural” than the original supply agreement fix that AB InBev proposed.

 

When AB InBev announced the Modelo acquisition back in June 2012, AB InBev simultaneously offered a fix to address U.S. competitive overlaps. But in that remedy, AB InBev planned only to sell Crown to Constellation and to brew Modelo brands for Constellation under a long-term supply agreement, while retaining all of Modelo’s brewing assets. AB InBev also would have had the ability to reacquire Modelo’s U.S. business after 10 years. The settlement filed on April 19 shows that AB InBev’s original fix greatly underestimated the extent to which the DOJ would require a more complete and permanent remedy.

 

In addition to the DOJ’s insistence on a core structural remedy, the settlement is noteworthy in that it includes many elements of a conduct fix that were necessary to make the structural elements work. Constellation is pledging to expand the Piedras Negras brewery over the next three years to at least 20 million hectoliters and must “use its best efforts” to meet specific interim deadlines and targets, such as executing contracts with design and engineering firms within six months and completing construction of the brewhouse within 30 months. Because Constellation needs this time to achieve brewing independence, even under the DOJ settlement ABI will provide transition services to Constellation, including brewing, for a period up to three years.

 

In further recognition that there will need to be some ongoing collaboration between Constellation and ABI, the consent decree also imposes some conduct obligations on ABI with respect to the distribution of Modelo brands over the next three years. Where Modelo brands in the United States are distributed through ABI majority-owned houses, Constellation can direct those distributors to sell their distribution rights for Modelo brands to another distributor. Where Modelo brands go through ABI affiliated (but not owned) houses, ABI cannot change its distributor incentive program to penalize ABI distributors for carrying Modelo brands. These provisions also show that the DOJ is aware of the importance of effective distribution to ensuring the competitiveness of the Modelo brands.

 

The proposed settlement still needs court approval, before which there is a 60-day public comment period. After the public comment period, the settlement will become final if the court determines (as expected) that it serves the public interest.

 

Implications

 

An obvious lesson from the settlement is that the DOJ will require true structural relief to address substantial potential competitive harms. Perhaps more noteworthy is the extent to which the DOJ may be flexible about behavioral provisions in the context of a structural fix. In ABI/Modelo, the DOJ not only accepted pledges by the divestiture buyer to become more competitive, but also a relatively long (three-year) interim supply relationship between competitors. Merging parties therefore should anticipate that remedy proposals should include structural relief, but also that behavioral elements may be acceptable to complement the underlying structural fix.

 

The settlement also illustrates that the DOJ is sensitive to the importance of efficient distribution for any acquirer of new assets. Constellation is protected from unfavorable ABI-owned distributor contracts for the three years, during which it would be reliant on ABI for brewing. Presumably, Constellation can use this time to ensure the long-term competitive distribution of its brands. This is consistent with the DOJ’s more general requirement that any divestiture acquirer be an effective, independent competitor in the market.

 

 

——

LAURENT-PERRIER (=)  FY13 results

 

Source: Exane BNP

May 28th

 

TP: EUR69 . Upside: 8%

Beverages (-) . France . Price (28 May. 13): EUR63.8

 

FY13 sales 3% below ambitious consensus, in line with our forecast

Organic growth of 0.6% resulted from a weaker than expected -0.8% volume effect but price/mix of 1.6% was better than feared. The FY13 results illustrated once again that Laurent-Perrier is outperforming its competitors due to its higher exposure to non-European countries (c.17% of sales) but also that industry fundamentals remain weak.

 

Muted price/mix in non-European markets

With reported sales growth of 2% in non-European markets and volume growth of 8% in FY13 (ahead of the industry at +4.4%), we stress that price/mix outside Europe is likely to have been negative since the group mentioned a positive FX effect.

 

EPS only 9% below ambitious consensus, saved by lower net interest and tax

EBIT came in 8% below consensus. The only reason that the miss vs. consensus at the net income level (9%) was not much more acute was because the group benefited from lower tax and financial charges than anticipated.

 

FY14: more of the same

Overall, the group expects a continuation of the trends seen in FY13 (difficult Europe, weak France), as do we. Despite the slowdown we have noticed outside Europe over the last few months (3-month rolling growth of 1% for champagne houses as of March vs. mid to high single digit previously) management felt ‘rather confident’ in demand from outside Europe. We now expect 6% volume growth for non-Europe in FY14 as investment in the Laurent Perrier brand is likely to result in further market share gains.

 

Estimates fine-tuned, consensus likely to come down by low to mid single-digit

Our FY14 is cut by 1% as lower EBIT is offset by a lower tax rate and financial expenses. However, the miss on FY 13 is likely to result in more pronounced consensus downgrades by low to mid single-digits depending on tax rate and net interest assumptions.

 

 

——

A vineyard’s ambitions for a bouquet from Brazil

 

Source: FT

By Joe Leahy

May 28th

 

When Morgana Miolo started doing business in China two years ago, the Brazilian was struck by the cultural differences of operating in the world’s second-largest economy.

 

“The Chinese close a deal with the most important person at the table raising a glass in toast higher than the others,” says the gaúcha, as people from Brazil’s southern state of Rio Grande do Sul are known. “My first time there, I didn’t know this stuff.”

 

More unusual than the vagaries of doing business in China, however, was the product Ms Miolo was selling. Hailing from a country best known in China for its savvy on the football field, this fourth-generation scion of a family of Brazilian viticulturists was in Shanghai to establish a market for her Miolo wine brands.

 

Now Miolo is achieving a feat many Brazilian companies can only dream of: selling something to the Chinese that is not soyabeans or iron ore. It is part of a wine industry that has been forging new paths into overseas markets in spite of Brazil’s high costs, and with a product not normally associated with Latin America’s largest economy.

 

The push is part of a wider campaign to promote exports of value-added products to try to offset the country’s dependence on unprocessed raw materials and commodities, particularly in commerce with China, its biggest trading partner. “We see analysis come out that there is a complementarity between the Brazilian and Chinese economies, but we want to go beyond complementarity, we don’t just want to sell commodities and import manufactured goods exclusively,” foreign minister Antonio Patriota recently told the Financial Times.

 

The story of Miolo tracks that of Brazil’s wider wine industry. Ms Miolo’s great grandfather, Giuseppe, arrived in Brazil in 1897 like thousands of other Italian immigrants at that time. He went to Bento Gonçalves in the Serra Gaúcha, a mountain range in Rio Grande do Sul, and bought “Lote 43”, some land in what became known as the Vale dos Vinhedos, or Valley of the Vineyards.

 

The family produced grapes for sale to vineyards until the 1980s, when prices collapsed, and Guiseppe’s three grandsons, Antônio, Darcy and Paulo, switched to making wine themselves. They produced their first, the Reserva Miolo Merlot, in 1992. “The family had to make a decision for its survival, so it started producing wine as an alternative source of income.”

 

Today the company claims to have 40 per cent of the fine-wines market in Brazil – wines using the vinifera grape varieties of Europe – and 15 per cent of Brazil’s spumante market. It produces 12m litres of wine from 1,150 hectares of vineyards across Brazil. These include those in Vale do Sao Francisco in tropical Bahia state, which produces three harvests every two years rather than the normal one per year. Miolo exports to 20 countries and revenue has grown from R$1m in 2000 to R$100m by 2010.

 

In the early 2000s, as the eight great-grandchildren of Guiseppe, comprising the fourth generation, assumed day-to-day management of the business, they began to see the limitations of Brazil’s still immature domestic market for fine wines.

 

Among the newer generation, Adriano Miolo, now chief executive, and his brother Fabio, had studied oenology, the science of winemaking, and knew that to be properly recognised inside and outside Brazil, Miolo would have to establish its brand overseas. “The inspiration to export came from our desire to make Miolo an international brand, the reference for Brazilian wine abroad,” says Ms Miolo.

 

The transformation started in 2003, when they contracted Frenchman Michel Rolland – one of the “flying winemakers”, a group of elite international travelling wine consultants who have transformed the industry globally – for 10 years to work on quality at Miolo.

 

Realising, too, that it did not have the financial muscle to create an international brand, Miolo teamed up with other local vineyards and a state industry group to form in 2002 what would become Wines of Brazil.

Learning about Chinese tastes for Brazil’s wines

 

As with Latin American exports in general, there is a temptation to lump Brazilian wines in with their counterparts in Spanish-speaking America. But, as with Latin America in general, this would be wrong. Brazilian wines are generally lighter and less alcoholic than their New World peers and are more like those of the Old World.

 

Now, they seem to be finding a ready audience in that oldest of markets, China. Morgana Miolo says the Chinese are exacting customers. The country’s nouveau riche drink partly as a sign of status, which means they buy wine in restaurants rather than at the supermarket. “What we learnt in Europe had no application, we had to start from zero,” says Ms Miolo, who first visited the country as part of a trade delegation in 2011.

 

Miolo concentrated on building a strong brand, which included opening a store in Shanghai and emphasising its family history, which is a plus point for the Chinese.

 

For advertising, it bought a large outdoor site in Shanghai that featured the puffy white clouds and pure blue sky that are common at Miolo’s vineyards in southern Brazil – again, a plus point for the Shanghainese, who are accustomed to more polluted skies.

 

For years, Brazilian wines had depended on the exotic idea that the country of samba and beaches could produce wine. However, to build a sustainable ex­port industry, the wine producers needed to convince consumers that the wines were not just exotic but also good. The organisation set about creating a more serious image by attending fairs, inviting foreign wine writers to Brazil, and matchmaking Brazilian producers with importers. “We wanted to show that we have quality wines,” says Andreia Gentilini Milan, promotions director of Wines of Brazil.

 

The trade body is now staging international events around Brazil’s hosting of the World Cup next year and the Olympics in 2016, such as the Wine Cup, a series of wine tasting competitions culminating in a final in Brazil next year.

 

Despite the export drives, Brazil and Miolo alike still sell a fraction of their production overseas. The UK is Miolo’s biggest market followed by China, where it sells only 7,000 cases a year (up from almost nothing two years ago).

 

Meanwhile, Brazilian producers struggle with high costs. They pay as much to ship a bottle of wine to the nearest port less than 500km away from Miolo’s vineyard in the Vale dos Vinhedos as to ship it to China. In the domestic market, they pay half the price of a bottle in tax, handing the advantage to producers in neighbouring Chile and Argentina, which can enter Brazil duty-free. Perhaps for this reason, foreign products constitute 80 per cent of the Brazilian wine market.

 

Indeed, the real prize for Brazilian and foreign producers alike is this domestic market. Brazilians consume only 2 litres of wine per capita per year compared with 23 litres for neighbouring Argentina, leaving room for enormous potential growth.

 

This is where being an exporter can help a Brazilian producer’s fortunes at home, Ms Miolo argues. Brazilians value imported products above domestic ones, but they are willing to grant an exception for Brazilian companies that have succeeded abroad.

 

“When consumers see that a Brazilian vineyard exports, they assign their products the status of an imported wine,” says Ms Miolo.

 

Overall, Brazilian wines may not be the cheapest but the fact they are not French or Italian or Chilean or Argentine continues to be their strength because they attract wine connoisseurs who are ever keen to experience something new.

 

Ms Miolo says “we have turned lemons into lemonade”, using the Portuguese expression for creating something good out of something bad, or in this case turning a disadvantage into an advantage.

 

 

——

BLACKHEATH BEVERAGE GROUP TO REPRESENT SLOVENIA VODKA

 

Source: BLACKHEATH BEVERAGE GROUP

May 28th

 

Blackheath Beverage Group is pleased to announce that they will be representing and launching Slovenia Vodka beginning in June in the New York and Connecticut markets.  Slovenia is the brainchild of celebrity chef and ‘Iron Chef’ winner, Peter Xaviar Kelly.  

 

Blackheath will utilize its proprietary sales and marketing platform to introduce Slovenia in key markets throughout the US and coordinate all on-the-ground sales and marketing efforts.

 

 

——

Don Sebastiani & Sons Names Tom Hawkins CFO and General Manager

 

Source: Balzac

May 28th

 

Don Sebastiani & Sons, a family-owned wine company based in Sonoma, California, has promoted 32-year wine and spirits industry veteran Tom Hawkins to Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and General Manager. In his new position, he will oversee the Operations, Winemaking and Human Resources functions of the company.

 

Hawkins has been Chief Financial Officer at Don Sebastiani & Sons since June 2010. He joined the company in July 2009.

 

 

——

Dron leaves William Grant

 

Source: Drinks International

By Christian Davis

28 May, 2013

 

William Grant & Sons has announced that Gordon Dron, its managing director for Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) has decided to leave the company.

 

A company statement says: “Following a restructure of the branded business unit within William Grant & Sons the company is disappointed to announce that Gordon Dron, managing director, EMEA has made the decision to leave the business.”

 

Dron joined Grants in April 2006 as MD, Southern Europe and was soon promoted to the role of MD, Europe and became a member of the executive committee.  He was then promoted to MD, EMEA in November 2010.

 

The company says he was “highly successful in developing a strategy for the region which ‘ignited a new wave of growth’ for WG&S Europe”.

 

He was responsible for establishing and implementing the route to market strategy which Grants says has been essential to its success in recent years and has resulted in a transformation in its strategic partnerships.

 

His leadership is said to have resulted in increased profitability in all core brands including Hendricks in Spain and Grants in France. He also led the integration of Tullamore Dew into all the key routes to market across EMEA.

 

In addition, Grants says Dron built a high performing team that enabled the delivery of the vision and strategy for this key region.

 

 

——

Jacksonville-based Bi-Lo to buy 165 new stores

 

Source: Times Union

By Drew Dixon 

May 28, 2013

 

Bi-Lo Holdings LLC, the parent company of Jacksonville-based Bi-Lo and Winn-Dixie grocery stores, will buy an additional 165 stores.

 

Bi-Lo is paying $265 million in cash to purchase owns all the Sweetbay, Harveys and Reid’s stores throughout the Southeastern United States from the Delhaize Group, the company said in a news release Tuesday. The stores employ about 10,000 workers.

 

The acquisition likely won’t be complete until the fourth quarter of this year, the company said.

 

“We are pleased to announce this transaction, which will build on the strength of our Bi-Lo and Winn-Dixie stores… .” Randall Onstead, Bi-Lo president and CEO said in the news release. “We look forward to welcoming the outstanding associates of all three chains to the Bi-Lo, Winn-Dixie family.

 

Bi-Lo and Winn-Dixie spokesman Brian Wright said the acquisition involves purchasing only the three chains. The Delhaize Group, a company based in Brussels, Belgium is not being acquired and will still operate chains such as Food Lion, Bottom Dollar Food and Hannaford stores.

 

“The scope of this transaction is around the stores,” Wright said. “Our corporate headquarters will remain in Jacksonville.”

 

The stores Bi-Lo is buying from Delhaize are in Florida, Georgia and South Carolina, Wright said. Harveys has several stores in South Georgia. Sweetbay is located more in South Florida with no stores in North Florida our South Georgia. Reids is located mainly in South Carolina. That adds more stores to areas where Bi-Lo and Winn-Dixie already exist in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee.

 

“This [acquisition] does allows us to go into different areas of the Southeast,” Wright said. “It’s going to allow us to extend our products to more customers . . There’s a lot of positives for our company.”

 

Since the acquisition is still pending, Wright said it’s not clear if any of the stores being acquired would be eliminated.

 

“We have a lot more to work through before we get into that information. We’ve just announced this agreement,” he said.

 

The acquisition adds to an already substantial chain of stores under Bi-Lo ownership. After the company, which was originally based in Greenville, S.C., bought out Winn-Dixie over a year ago, it had 686 grocery stores.

 

The company employs about 60,000 workers.

 

 

——

Cerberus or Bain Capital might buy Harris Teeter

 

Source: NewsObserver

May 23, 2013

 

Cerberus Capital Management and Bain Capital are possibly interested in buying Matthews-based Harris Teeter, as the grocer continues to explore a sale, The Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

 

The possible sale of Harris Teeter has been rumored for more than three months, since the company disclosed two hedge funds had inquired about buying the company.

 

Harris Teeter declined to comment on Thursday’s report. A spokeswoman referred questions to the company’s earlier statements, which only confirmed that the company had hired JPMorgan to look into a sale.

 

Earlier this year, Cerberus led an investment group that acquired 850 Albertsons, Jewel-Osco and Shaw’s grocery stores from Supervalu. The investors paid $100 million worth of equity and assumed $3.2 billion of debt to acquire the stores.

 

Bain Capital, which gained prominence last year as Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s old firm, led a $2.4-billion buyout of Dunkin’ Brands, owner of Dunkin’ Donuts, in 2005. That company went public again last year.

 

The Wall Street Journal cited unnamed sources, who cautioned that neither Bain nor Cerberus had yet decided to pursue a serious bid for Harris Teeter.

 

Harris Teeter operates more than 200 grocery stores, about two-thirds of them in North Carolina. The company has a market capitalization of more than $2.2 billion.

 

Analysts have also mentioned rival grocers, such as Publix and Ahold (which operates the Giant supermarkets), as possible acquirers of Harris Teeter.

 

 

——

Affordable Care Act looks affordable for Retail/Restaurants, with a few exceptions

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

May 28th

 

Health reform: Costs likely manageable

Our detailed analysis of the impact of healthcare reform (PPACA) on Retail/Restaurant companies suggests incremental costs will be manageable for the vast majority of firms – despite some headlines to the contrary. The magnitude of the cost increases appears modest and is in fact spread over several years. We assume few households will sign up for newly offered health insurance in 2014 when the penalties to the employee for not taking insurance are nominal ($206 per average household). We expect increased adoption by 2016 when these consumer penalties ramp to a more meaningful level ($1,505 per average household).

 

Three groups of companies more exposed

We highlight three groups of companies that may be more exposed than average: (1) Restaurants which operate company-owned as opposed to franchised business models, (2) Grocers which have relatively low operating margins and may have limited pricing power, and (3) Secularly challenged businesses with depressed margins which will have a hard time absorbing yet another cost of doing business.

 

(1) Restaurants affected, pricing an offset

In the absence of offsetting strategies, restaurants would be highly affected due to low sales per employee and a large number of full-time workers not offered insurance today. The greatest impact will be for company-owned systems including CMG, DRI and CAKE, in our view, whereas franchisors appear to be mostly insulated. Despite some risk, we believe price increases may ultimately serve as an offset for the group.

 

(2) Grocers: low margin, less pricing-power

We highlight SVU and SWY within food retailing as being at risk, as the cost of complying with PPACA amounts to 8-10% of current profits. Price increases could help offset some of the impact, though we believe pricing power is limited for traditional grocers.

 

(3) Secularly challenged businesses at risk

We highlight RSH, BKS, ODP, and OMX where EBIT margins are 2% or less. Given low profitability, the proportional impact as a percent of profits is high for this group. Further, the ability to absorb and/or pass on incremental costs may be limited for these companies.

 

 

——

Turkey: Anti-alcohol bill leaves many Turks dispirited

 

Source: USA Today

Jacob Resneck

May 29, 2013

 

Turkey is about to enact the strictest alcohol laws in the republic’s 89-year history in a move that some Turks complain is part of a creeping Islamist agenda.

 

The bill supported by Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan would prohibit the sale of alcohol from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. and forbid the depiction of alcohol consumption on television, billboards, newspapers, storefronts and at festivals.

 

Liquor sales within 100 yards of a school or mosque would be banned.

 

Erdogan insists the measure is intended to protect public health and not an attempt to legislate morals or force Islamic strictures on a state that has been largely secular for decades until the rise of the dominant Justice and Development Party.

 

“The regulation does not interfere with anyone’s lifestyle,” Erdogan said in a televised address Tuesday. “If you are going to drink, then get your drink and drink at home. We are not against it.”

 

Some Muslims believe alcohol, which has been enjoyed in Turkey and especially in Istanbul for centuries, is a violation of the Islamic faith. Though Turkey has a Muslim majority, its constitution enshrines secular values.

 

Since coming to power a decade ago, Erdogan’s government has increased alcohol taxes more than threefold, removed alcoholic drinks on domestic flights of Turkey’s flagship carrier Turkish Airlines and removed a ban on head scarves.

 

Erdogan lashed out at “tipsy youth” as the reason for some prohibitions. He has said he wants to build a “devout” generation in Turkey.

 

Along that line, more than 17,000 mosques have been built in Turkey at state direction in the past decade that Erdogan has been in power. In many cities, that means the ban on serving alcohol near a mosque may shut down liquor sales in many restaurants, bars and markets in city centers.

 

Even before the parliament has passed the bill, some restaurants had withdrawn alcohol in preparation for the ban.

 

Beer and wine were taken off the menu two weeks ago at a restaurant frequented by tourists between two mosques across from Istanbul’s iconic Galata Tower. The owners of the establishment measured the distance and found it would violate the new boundaries.

Business leaders warn that the rules will damage Turkey’s tourism industry, a major source of revenue for a significant segment of the population. The industry brings in as much as $50 billion in annual revenue.

 

Turkey’s Association of Tourism, Restaurant Investors and Managers released a statement warning of “irreversible damage” to the country’s image. It noted that per capita alcohol consumption is about 1.5 liters a year – a mere fraction of the European average.

 

The government, the association said, has been “conjuring up a fear of alcoholism that does not exist.”

 

The public debate began last month when Erdogan made a speech pronouncing Ayran – a salty mixture of yogurt and water – and not Raki, an aniseed-based liquor similar to Ouzo, as Turkey’s national drink. Weeks later, the sweeping bill against alcohol was introduced into parliament.

 

Debate was limited to two days, and the ruling party forced an early vote, prompting many opposition lawmakers to walk out in protest after a 17-hour debate that stretched into the early morning hours.

turkey alcohol

 

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan defends legislation that would restrict alcohol in Ankara, Turkey, on Friday.(Photo: AP)

 

Yusuf Alatas, a prominent human rights lawyer, says the ruling party has been steamrolling critics and forcing sweeping changes with little debate on issues that split the country and alter its modern history of non-religious rule. He says the passage of the alcohol restrictions is part of an Islamist agenda to establish religious law.

 

“The (ruling party) has more than 51% of the vote – in a democracy, that’s a lot of power,” Alatas told USA TODAY. “They should be respecting minority opinion a lot more than they are right now.”

 

He says there’s a worrying trend of lawmakers attempting to legislate morals.

 

“The state should not decide on how people live their lives,” he said.

 

Erdogan has lashed out at critics and for the first time invoked the Islamic prohibition of alcohol as justification for the measure.

 

“When two drunkards make a law, you respect it. But when we make a law for something that faith orders, you reject it. Why?” he said Tuesday in an address to fellow party members. “If religion orders something, will you object anyway?”

 

 

——

Turkey: Creeping Islamization or pre-emptive politics: what’s behind Turkey’s ‘booze ban’?

 

Source: Albawaba

May 28th, 2013

 

With the new law, alcohol advertising campaigns such as promotions, sponsored activities, festivals and free giveaways have been prohibited. Retailers will no longer be allowed to sell alcoholic beverages between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. In addition all liquor bottles sold will have to display warning signs that indicate the harms of alcohol, similar to those found on cigarette packages.

 

In TV series, films and music videos, images that glorify the consumption of alcohol will not be allowed. Images of alcohol will be blurred, in the same way as cigarettes are being blurred already.

 

Student dormitories, health institutions, sports clubs, all sorts of education institutions and gas stations will be banned from selling alcohol. Already acquired licenses to sell alcohol will remain intact. For new facilities to get a license, they must to be located outside the perimeter of 100 meters of educational and religious centers.

 

The new bill received mixed reactions throughout the country and internationally. The opposition in Turkey argues that these regulations aim to make Turkish society more “Islamist”.

 

Osman Coskunoglu, a former lawmaker from the main opposition Republican People’s Party (CHP), tweeted:

 

“Step by step toward fundamentalist Islamization by the ruling party: Turkey’s new booze law”

 

“This is not a struggle against the ills of alcohol but an attempt to re-design the society according to their beliefs and lifestyle,” Musa Çam, a deputy from the CHP said.

 

The criticism is constructed in a way that discusses the regulations as being an attempt of Islamization of Turkey. This kind of labeling creates the notion that the regulations are affiliated with so-called Islamist extremism rather than a conservative ideology of a government that is religiously motivated. When a certain government in the west or the US promotes a law that is religiously motivated about abortion, alcohol or gay marriage, the words used are conservative rather than “religious” or “Christian.”

 

There is nothing wrong with a government that has a conservative ideology and that is in fact elected by the people of the country. Turkey is not Saudi Arabia where the government consists of a royal family and a king, who has never been elected and who introduce certain laws that they see fit without paying the least attention to the population’s needs or preferences.

 

Also, these restrictions, as the opposition suggests, do not actually limit people’s freedom of choice. This is not a ban on alcohol; it is a regulation for the sales and advertising of alcohol. People can still buy alcohol from retailers at anytime between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., and it is readily available in bars, nightclubs, hotels and restaurants without any time restriction. The biggest loser in all of this is the alcohol producer who will no longer be able to promote or sell their products as easy in Turkey.

 

Government officials argued that the regulations they have proposed are already being implemented in the west, in countries like Sweden, Norway and Finland. A number of US states also have similar regulations. The opposition, on the other hand, argues that the problems that the west suffers from are nonexistent in Turkey and thus such restrictions are irrelevant. Does this mean that a government should wait until the problems appear and then act on it? Whether the problem exists or not should not be a factor in implementing a law.

 

In addition, Turkey is moving towards a lifestyle that resembles the western culture, actually that was the whole point of the secular movement; to get Turkey to become more “western.” That means the country might at some point have to deal with the problems the west is facing now.

 

Foreign companies that might have never considered Turkey for investment 10 years ago are now rushing to acquire successful Turkish companies. Representatives of Diageo, one of the world’s leading spirits company, which acquired Mey Içki for $2.1 billion in 2011, owns the country’s leading raki brand said on May 25:

 

“The alcohol restrictions adopted by the Turkish Parliament May 24 will damage Turkey’s image as a progressive and commercial country.”

 

This is a company that has made a huge investment in Turkey and is planning to recover their $2.1 billion and make double that in profit.The fact that the annual alcohol consumption in Turkey was 1.5 liters per capita in 2010 means that there is a vast potential consumer base in Turkey that a company like Diageo could target and benefit from.

 

A company of such financial capability does not make such an investment without believing that the “Muslim culture” in Turkey will not stand between them and their profits.

 

What does that mean for Turkey?

 

It means that Turkey is as interesting for those companies as the western countries once were. In those countries, societies did not remain stagnant in the face of powerful corporations, who came to increase their profits, but were actually transformed because of them. Those companies target the young emerging generation in a certain market in order to increase sales and profits. And the priority of billion-dollar companies is profit and not the well being of society. Therefore, in a fast growing country like Turkey, the young generation who strives to be modern and western and who is quite familiar with the west through the media will ultimately be affected by those companies’ effective advertising strategies.

 

Turkey is not immune to the problems that have emerged in the west, as a matter of fact it is closer to them than ever. The west and the US started out as conservative societies that opposed gay marriage and abortion and believed firmly in the Church. But a transformation took place; yet these modern and developed entities continue to suffer from social problems. That is the path Turkey is taking. Thus, the Turkish government should be pro-active and act responsibly and not wait for the problems – others have already experienced – to actually arise.

 

 

——

United Kingdom: UK considers cutting amount of TV alcohol adverts

 

Source: The Spirits Business

by Becky Paskin

28th May, 2013

 

British broadcasting watchdog Ofcom has ordered a review into whether to cut the amount of alcohol advertising permitted on UK TV, after a report found children are watching more adult programmes.

 

British TV shows like The X-Factor, which are popular with young children, are allowed to carry alcohol adverts under current rules

 

Television shows including Britain’s got Talent and the X Factor are attracting a large number of underage viewers, but under current rules aren’t exempt from carrying alcohol advertisements.

 

Under the rules, shows that particularly appeal to under-18s are prohibited from airing alcohol advertisements.

 

But since a recent report found that the number of alcohol adverts seen by children rose almost 19% between 2007-2011 to 3.2 per week, Ofcom has ordered a review of current practices.

 

Research conducted by the regulator found that the most popular TV shows for four to nine-year-olds are X Factor and Britain’s Got Talent, but while both may currently carry alcohol ads, neither does.

 

Ofcom has asked the Advertising Standards Authority and the Broadcasting Committee of Advertising Practice to “assess whether the limits placed on children’s exposure to alcohol advertising on TV are effective”.

 

 

——

Ireland: Ireland plans to adopt plain packaging of cigarettes

 

Source: FT

By Jamie Smyth in Dublin

May 28th

 

Ireland plans to become the second country in the world to ban all branding on cigarette packets following a decision on Tuesday to introduce a law forcing tobacco companies to use plain packaging.

 

Health chiefs lauded the move as a vital tool to combat youth smoking, while tobacco companies warned removing all logos, trademarks and colours from packs would benefit criminals involved in illegal smuggling.

 

“While many arguments will be made against such an introduction, I am confident that this legislation will be justified and supported purely by the fact that it will save lives,” said James Reilly, Ireland’s health minister.

 

He said he expected the legislation to be enacted by the Irish parliament early next year.

 

Australia introduced the world’s first plain packaging law in December when it replaced corporate logos on packs with drab olive green coverings decorated with gruesome pictures depicting the health risks of smoking. Earlier this year New Zealand and Scotland also announced plans to phase out branding on cigarette packages, although neither country has set a definitive timeframe for introducing plain packaging yet.

 

The move by Dublin follows an intensification of a global battle between Big Tobacco and health campaigners over several tough new measures designed to curb smoking.

 

British American Tobacco, Britain’s Imperial Tobacco, Philip Morris and Japan Tobacco lost a legal bid to block the introduction of plain packaging legislation in Australia last year.

 

However, a challenge was recently lodged at the World Trade Organisation by four tobacco producing countries – Ukraine, Honduras, Cuba and the Dominican Republic – which allege Canberra’s ban on branding breaches trade rules on international property rights.

 

“Destroying the fabric of trademarks, high-quality brands, and geographical indications, the reputations of which took decades to develop, is not an effective way to reduce smoking,” said the Dominican Republic in a statement this month.

 

Ireland, where almost one in three people smoke, was the first EU state to introduce a ban on smoking in the workplace in 2004. Dublin followed up with bans on packets of 10 cigarettes, in-store tobacco advertising and displays of tobacco products at retail outlets in 2009. Mr Reilly is also considering introducing a ban on smoking in cars which have children as passengers.

 

Tobacco companies said there was no credible evidence to suggest plain packaging would reduce youth smoking rates.

 

“Any proposals to unjustifiably take away our intellectual property will only serve the interests of criminal gangs and counterfeiters,” said John Freda, general manager of JTI, the owner of Benson and Hedges.

 

“Plain packaging will make it easier for the underworld to manufacture fakes, putting money in the pockets of criminals and taking money out of the tills of shopkeepers across Ireland,” he said.

 

Tobacco smuggling is a growing industry in Ireland, with almost one in five cigarettes smoked illegally smuggled into the country.

 

A political controversy erupted in Ireland earlier this month when it was revealed that tobacco company executives met the Irish prime minister, minister for finance and justice minister to lobby privately against the proposed law.

 

Earlier this month the UK abandoned plans to introduce plain packaging law, with the coalition instead deciding to focus on core policies when it outlined its legislative agenda. The decision prompted questions about the role of Conservative party adviser Lynton Crosby, whose consultancy had advised the tobacco industry in Australia on ways to fight off similar regulations.

Our Website

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Like Us On Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/FranklinliquorsMA

Follow Us On Twitter

http://www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

 

 

Liquor Industry News 5-28-13

May 28, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday May 28th

Today Is A Biodynamic FRUIT Day.

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

Diageo boss calls time with £50m ($77 million)

 

Paul Walsh, the departing chief executive, is to receive one of the biggest-ever farewell packages

 

Source: Sunday Times

Matthew Goodman

26 May 2013

 

PAUL WALSH will leave Diageo, the world’s biggest spirits producer, with a farewell package that could be worth close to £50m.

 

The 58-year-old steps down as chief executive of the Johnnie Walker and Smirnoff maker at the end of next month and will remain on the board until September. He is due to retire in June next year after completing a handover to his successor, Ivan Menezes.

 

The “golden goodbye” could be one of the most lucrative in British corporate history. Walsh, who has been Diageo’s chief executive since 2000, holds stock worth £15.5m at today’s share price of £20.19Å. In addition, he is sitting on share options that have a theoretical value of £11.7m. He also has a pension pot worth £19.2m, which will generate an annual payment of £578,000.

 

But Diageo insiders said he may not be entitled to the full amount. They pointed out that the share options, which vest over the next three years, are performance-related. Walsh will also be unable to touch his pension pot until he retires.

 

Last month the outgoing boss sold shares worth about £16m after cashing in some of his options.

 

Walsh has been with Diageo since 1982 and, as chief executive, transformed it from a sprawling consumer goods giant into a drinks specialist. He sold off Burger King restaurants and food brands such as Häagen-Dazs ice cream to focus on drinks including Guinness. Under his 13-year stewardship, the company’s market value has climbed by £30bn.

 

Walsh also presided over a string of deals that have strengthened Diageo’s presence in America and seen it grow in emerging markets such as China and Brazil.

 

The most notable was the $8bn takeover of the Seagram spirits empire in 2000, which Diageo pulled off in partnership with its rival, Pernod Ricard.

 

 

——

Post taste test reveals drinkers can’t tell good from cheap vodka

 

Source: New York Post

By CYNTHIA R. FAGEN

May 26, 2013

 

It’s just a shot in the dark.

 

More than two dozen New Jersey bars caught pouring cheap hooch into top-shelf bottles got away with cheating customers likely because 44 percent of tipplers can’t even taste the difference, a Post survey has found.

 

We enlisted eager volunteers to sample a shot of the $35-a-bottle French-made Grey Goose vodka and a shot of upstate Syracuse’s $8-a-bottle grain vodka Alexis to see whether they could pick the “better” booze.

 

The results were sobering – 22 of the 50 tasters preferred the low-end elixir.

 

“I would just order the cheap one from now on. If you can’t taste the difference, I would go for the low end,” said Emma Taylor, 22, after knocking one back. “I don’t make that much money.”

 

Said Lee Hsieh, 27, “You wouldn’t be able to tell the difference, especially if you had a few drinks.”

 

But Thalita Cudzik, 26, winced after guzzling the Alexis.

 

“Even if you can’t tell the difference, you are paying more, and that’s not right. If it’s bad liquor, then you’re going to have to deal with it in the morning with a hangover,” said Cudzik, a nanny.

 

Christian Joseph, 46, an IT manager from Connecticut, preferred the Grey Goose.

 

“If I had a watered-down drink, that would be just wrong,” he said.

 

Air Force Officer Todd Inouye, 35, called the test a wash, joking, “They both taste like jet fuel.”

 

A yearlong investigation by the New Jersey Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control found one New Jersey drinking establishment used rubbing alcohol and food coloring as a substitute for scotch. Another, it said, poured dirty water into an empty liquor bottle.

 

As part of the probe, called Operation Swill, undercover testers ordered “neat” drinks (no ice or mixers) from 63 establishments. Some had been named in complaints. Others were chosen at random.

 

Using a device called a True Spirit Authenticator, they analyzed 150 samples of supposedly straight premium shots on the spot. The results: 30 were phony.

 

The Post’s tasters called the deception tasteless.

 

“That’s like when we used to water down our parents’ liquor. I guess they thought they wouldn’t get caught,” said one female liquor lover, who chose the Alexis.

 

 

——

India: Spurious liquor claims 4 lives in Sultanpur district

 

Source: Times of India

TNN

May 26, 2013

 

Celebratory drinking claimed four lives in Sultanpur district on Friday as four people from the groom’s side, including his father, died after consuming spurious liquor. In another incident that was reported from a village in Amethi district, ten people had lost their lives after consuming illicit liquor on May 8.

 

Ramnarayan Dhuria, a resident of Shrirampur Lamoli village in Sultanpur had organised his daughter’s wedding at the village on Friday. 55-year-old Mastram Dhuria, father of the groom, along with several others arrived at the Sultanpur village from Ambedkar Nagar district.

 

Ramnarayan served two bottles including a branded whisky bottle to Mastram, Ramchandra Verma (30), Indrajeet Verma (35) and Rajendra (28). The group had consumed one bottle when they started feeling uneasy. The liquor was apparently spiked with some dangerous chemicals locally.

 

The condition of the group started deteriorating and three members were rushed to a nearby hospital. Meanwhile, Indrajeet said he was sick and decided to sleep at the village as he felt dizzy. The three died at the hospital while undergoing treatment while Indrajeet was found dead in the morning.

 

Senior officials from district administration, excise department and Sultanpur police visited the village on Saturday. The officials took the whisky bottles in custody and sent the bodies for autopsy. The incident took place under the jurisdiction of Motipur police station and owner of the store that sold the liquor to Ramnarayan as well as persons responsible for manufacturing of the illicit liquor will be booked, said police. In the Amethi incident, 10 persons died after consuming illicit country liquor during a local event at Miyan Ka Purwa village. Several including the manufacturer and supplier were arrested subsequently.

 

 

——

You May Be Liable For Someone Else’s Overintoxication

 

Source: Law360,

Ashley Watkins

May 24th

 

Recently, the parents of a young man who died of alcohol poisoning filed a wrongful death suit against Phusion Projects Inc., the company behind the Four Loko beverage. This type of lawsuit against the manufacturer of an alcohol beverage is uncommon.

 

The complaint, filed in King County Superior Court, made allegations under the Washington Product Liability Act, claiming that Four Loko is not reasonably safe as designed and that the product was not adequately labeled regarding the dangers of the drink. Dram shop laws facilitate lawsuits against retailers for overserving someone who causes a drunk-driving accident or for serving minors, but courts typically have not found the manufacturer liable for harms to the consumer caused by his own overconsumption.

 

Four Loko in its original form was an innovative product, combining caffeine and malt liquor into a single beverage. While initially very popular, the drink came under attack after a string of incidents in 2011. In Washington, nine college students were hospitalized after consuming Four Lokos at a party, leading the attorney general to push for a national restriction on the sale of the product. In the face of this backlash against the product, the company removed caffeine from its formulation.

 

The complaint filed in Washington parrots two of the major criticisms of the product: first that the 23.5-ounce drink contained the alcohol equivalent of up to four or five beers, rather than the one or two advertised and second that the combination of alcohol and caffeine allegedly prevented the consumer from feeling the effects of the alcohol, leading them to drink more than they otherwise would have.

 

The claims raise a number of case-specific issues when determining liability for over-consumption of alcohol. In Washington, a plaintiff’s claim of defective design requires him or her to show either that the product’s risk outweighs its utility or that the product was “unsafe to an extent beyond that which would be contemplated by the ordinary customer.” RCW 7.72.030(3).

 

Typically, inherently dangerous products fail under the first theory. For example, a Washington court found that given the purpose of a trampoline, there was no alternative design that could have prevented injury from jumping. Anderson v. Weslo Inc., 79 Wash.App. 829, 837 (Wash. App. 1995). The same is true with an alcohol beverage. By its nature, overconsumption of wine, beer or spirits has an intoxicating effect. And removing the alcohol leaves you with something other than an alcohol beverage.

 

The plaintiff’s claim under the second theory also suffers limitations. The ordinary consumer would likely anticipate that overconsumption of a malt liquor could make them inebriated. The Second Restatement of Torts on products liability even uses alcohol as an example of reactions that are contemplated by the ordinary consumer:

 

The article sold must be dangerous to an extent beyond that which would be contemplated by the ordinary consumer who purchases it, with the ordinary knowledge common to the community as its characteristics. Good whiskey is not unreasonably dangerous because it will make some people drunk, and is especially dangerous to alcoholics.

 

In this case, it could be argued that the ordinary consumer may not anticipate the effects of the interaction of caffeine and alcohol. The biological reactions to the competing stimulant and depressant may be presented as a complicating factor, masking the effects of intoxication and making it more difficult to gauge how much could be consumed safely.

 

But bars and restaurants have been safely serving “rum and Cokes” and Irish coffees for many years, without specific liability. A court would be hard-pressed to figure out a way to impose liability for this type of beverage but overlook the combinations of caffeine and alcohol so readily accepted in other situations.

 

A second issue likely to arise is causation. As with the Central Washington University students mentioned above, the decedent in this case consumed Four Loko along with other types of alcohol. Pinpointing his reaction to a single beverage among the group could prevent plaintiffs from being able to prove causation, a mandatory element of a wrongful death tort claim.

 

A third issue will be the interaction between a claim of inadequate warnings for a product whose warnings and labels are heavily regulated under state and federal law. The plaintiffs have not alleged that the product was sold in violation of strict federal production standards or that the labels used on the product were not approved in accordance with federal law.

 

While compliance with federal regulations is not a bar to inadequate warning claims, it most certainly would give the courts pause. Alcohol beverage manufacturers would be put in a tough situation if compliance with production and labeling requirements still left them open to liability based on an improper labeling theory.

 

Perhaps the plaintiff’s strongest claim is for nonconformity to express and implied warranties. Not only is this claim under a strict liability standard, as opposed to the negligence standard applied to the charges above, but the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s review and subsequent pressure on Four Loko to change its formulation could be used as evidence that the product did not conform to implied or express warranties. This would be particularly true if the alcohol or caffeine content was found to be substantially different than what was disclosed on the label.

 

In addition to accuracy in labeling, the packaging of Four Loko proved problematic. Some groups argued that the colorful, bright packaging of the product targeted a younger consumer, making it more appealing to underage drinkers. It could also be argued that the consumer’s reasonable expectation was that they could safely consume all of a seemingly single-serve can. Both of these issues are further wrinkles in any potential lawsuit against beverage manufacturers.

 

A number of lessons can be learned from this representative lawsuit in Washington. While the liability addressed in this case may seemingly be specific to Four Loko’s combination of caffeine and alcohol, pioneers of new alcohol beverage categories often face a similar gauntlet of accusations.

 

As the experience of Black Death Vodka and Sparks proved, image problems can create consequences with regulators and private parties that ultimately make continued business unprofitable. Along with testing, accurate labeling is also critical. The final point, unrelated to the substance of the liability analysis above, is to ensure that liquor liability is included in the company’s insurance policy. This failure may prove to be one of Four Loko’s greatest challenges.

 

In addition to the specific lessons learned, this case raises a number of public policy concerns in light of the possibility that a court may impose liability for overintoxication on alcohol manufacturers. Imposing liability in this instance rejects the “individual responsibility” approach often favored in American society.

 

The pushback from Big Brother-type restrictions on drinking is what led to the repeal of Prohibition and the 21st Amendment (notably, the only amendment actually repealing a prior amendment). As alcohol was ultimately legalized by the 21st Amendment, society has arguably already determined that the benefits of alcohol beverages outweigh the harms.

 

Finally, at risk of relying on the cliche of a slippery slope, the industry as a whole may fear: Once a court finds a manufacturer liable for an individual’s overconsumption, what is to stop that liability from extending to distributors, retailers or even individuals who provide alcohol beverages to their friends?

 

 

——

Australia: Regulator seeks to put big alcohol promos in ‘high-risk’ basket

 

Source: SMH

Kirsty Needham

May 26, 2013

 

Discounts at bottle shops of more than 50 per cent off wine, beer and liquor will be classified as high-risk promotions likely to cause alcohol-related harm under tough draft guidelines by the liquor regulator.

 

The tightening of NSW liquor promotion guidelines to include discounting at bottle shops for the first time comes amid fierce price competition by the liquor retailers, particularly the big supermarkets, who have blitzed the market with two-for-one wine and free beer promotions on grocery receipts. The classification of the promotions could lead to the ban of such offers.

 

The Office of Liquor Gaming and Racing has circulated a draft copy of the contentious new guidelines to the liquor industry for feedback, but has refused to comment until the guidelines are signed off by Hospitality Minister George Souris.

 

The Liquor Stores Association has reacted by calling on the regulator to produce evidence that discounts of more than 50 per cent cause harm to consumers.

 

Public health groups, which have complained they have been locked out of the consultation process, have lodged complaints with the office in recent months about supermarket bottle shop promotions they say are encouraging the bulk purchase and heavy consumption of alcohol among young people, including Woolworths and Coles, pictured, offering two-for-one prices on wine and free beer on grocery receipts. The regulator formed a preliminary view the coupon offers may pose a risk and is deciding what action to take. Coles also offered on the internet to give away free bottles of premium Fifth Leg wine to customers who bring ”bad, unopened wine” into First Choice bottle shops. The promotion was banned last month by the office.

 

Under the Liquor Act, the director-general of NSW Trade and Investment can restrict or ban promotions it believes risk encouraging the misuse of alcohol, but must first publish guidelines for industry that indicate the types of promotions likely to be deemed risky.

 

Under 2009 guidelines, price discounts of ”50 per cent or higher for consumption on premises” were classed as an unacceptable risk. .

 

The liquor industry has bristled at the move to more tightly regulate retail discounting, claiming pensioners and low-income households will be disadvantaged. But the Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education, the Australian Medical Association and the Police Association of NSW jointly wrote to the office last week requesting they be given the opportunity to give feedback on the new guidelines, but have received no response.

 

NSW Greens MP John Kaye said he was concerned the delay in publication of the guidelines was because the industry was being allowed to ”negotiate changes that work for them”.

 

”Once again the O’Farrell government is negotiating an important health policy behind closed doors with the industry that is being regulated,” he said.

 

 

——

Young Drivers and Alcohol: A Deadly Mix

 

Source: New York Times

By HANNAH FAIRFIELD

May 27th

 

It is well known that young drivers are more likely than older ones to have accidents. But a visual analysis of national data on drunken driving puts the disparity into stark relief – and suggests whose lives might be saved by a proposal to lower the legal blood-alcohol limit.

 

The recommendation, by the National Transportation Safety Board, urges the 50 states and the District of Columbia to lower the limit of 0.08 percent to 0.05 percent, the standard in most industrialized countries.

 

Drivers younger than 26 cause the most auto fatalities in the United States, regardless of alcohol consumption. But 21 percent of young drivers involved in a fatal accident have some alcohol in their system – higher than in other age groups. Researchers have shown that even a small amount of alcohol can disrupt a person’s ability to concentrate or do two things at once. For less experienced drivers, one or two drinks can cause the loss of reasoning and reaction time that might result in a fatal crash.

 

“Young drivers have a far greater risk differential in the 0.08 to 0.05 range,” said Deborah A. P. Hersman, the board’s chairwoman. “Lowering the legal limit can make people more thoughtful about having the second, third or fourth drink – because every drink raises a driver’s crash risk level exponentially.”

 

More than 6,600 impaired drivers are involved in fatal accidents every year, causing about 10,000 deaths. About half of those accidents are caused by drivers with blood alcohol levels at or below 0.16 percent.

 

The chart shows that the red “hot spots” start with young drivers at even the lowest blood-alcohol levels, and decline as drivers get older. If the proposed legislation is adopted by the states, young drivers and their passengers may be the biggest winners.

 

 

——

On-premise premiumization of Spirits continues, with most spirits categories seeing accelerated price/mix in 1Q13 relative to 2012 trends

 

Source: GuestMetrics

May 27th

 

According to GuestMetrics, the overall average price for spirits in full service restaurants and bars accelerated during the first quarter of 2013, the result of consumers trading up to more expensive brands in the Bourbon, Scotch, Tequila, and Vodka categories, as well as incremental pricing being taken in the majority of the spirits categories.

 

“While spirits’ price/mix was up +2.5% during 2012 compared to the prior year, that accelerated to +3.2% during 1Q13,” said Bill Pecoriello, CEO of GuestMetrics LLC.  “As we wrote about several months ago, there has been a “hollowing out” taking place in the spirits category, with consumers migrating away from the Premium tier in favor of High End & Super Premium brands, as well as Value brands.  This is likely a reflection of the impact of creative marketing for top tier brands causing trade-up, and simultaneously, a consumer base that continues to be under economic pressure causing trade-down to less expensive brands,” continued Pecoriello.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, Super Premium’s share of spirits sales increased from 32.1% in 2011 to 32.6% in 2012 and has accelerated to 33.8% in 1Q13; High End Premium’s share increased from 52.3% in 2011 to 53.0% in 2012 to 53.8% in 1Q13; and at the other end of the pricing spectrum, the Value segment increased from 21.9% in 2011 to 22.3% in 2012 to 22.5% in 1Q13.  Those gains came at the expense of the Premium segment, which contracted from 25.7% in 2011 to 24.7% in 2012 to 23.7% in 1Q13.

 

“In terms of changes in price/mix across the various spirits categories, eight of the 10 main spirits categories saw an acceleration in their year-over-year price/mix from 2012 to 1Q13, and only Bourbons and Brandy/Cognac saw any deceleration,” said Peter Reidhead, VP of Strategy and Insights at GuestMetrics.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, year-over-year growth in price/mix for Vodka accelerated from +2.0% in 2012 to +3.8% in 1Q13; Tequila accelerated from +2.0% to +3.1%; Scotch accelerated from +4.6% to +5.5%; Rum accelerated from +2.4% to +3.1%; Irish accelerated from +1.2% to +2.6%; Gin accelerated from +3.4% to +3.6%; Cordials accelerated from +3.1% to +3.9%; and Canadian accelerated from +3.2% to +3.5%.  Price/mix for Bourbons and Brandy/Cognac remained in positive year-over-year territory, but both decelerated slightly: Bourbons from +2.1% to +1.5%, and Brandy/Cognac from +1.5% to +0.7%.

 

“Looking at the spirits categories that saw the largest shifts in price segments, Bourbons has seen the most dramatic hollowing out effect.  Super Premium’s share of Bourbon sales increased from 14% in 2011 to 15% in 2012 and reached 16% in 1Q13, while Value’s share increased from 9% in 2011 to 12% in 2012, and is now almost 16% in 1Q13,” said Brian Barrett, President of GuestMetrics. “Super Premium in Scotch saw its sales share increase from about 58.5% in 2011 to 60.5% in 1Q13, and in Tequila, increased from about 14% of sales in 2011 to about 16% in 1Q13.  The largest spirits category, Vodka, has also seen some premiumization take place, with Super Premium and High End brands together gaining about 1.5 points of share from 2011 to 1Q13.”

 

 

——

Pernod Ricard Forecasts Slower China Growth on Weaker Economy

 

Source: Bloomberg

May 28, 2013

 

Pernod Ricard (RI) SA, France’s biggest distiller, forecast weaker growth in China as slower economic growth hurts demand and the government’s austerity campaign weighs on entertainment spending.

 

The maker of Martell Cognac and G.H. Mumm champagne expects “high single digit” growth in China in the year ending June 2013 and “high single digit, low double digit,” growth in the midterm, Pierre Coppere, head of Pernod’s Asian unit, told investors in Beijing today. The company reported a 24 percent sales rise in China last year.

 

Distillers including Paris-based Pernod and Remy Cointreau SA (RCO) are counting on emerging markets to drive sales as a credit crisis crimps consumer spending in Europe. Pernod posted third-quarter revenue which missed estimates on April 25 as consumers in developing markets held back spending.

 

A tougher macroeconomic environment in China and President Xi Jinping’s crackdown on extravagant gift-giving and banquets by government officials have weighed on sales in the nation, Gilles Bogaert, Pernod’s chief financial officer, told investors on April 25. To drive sales in its second-largest market the company is targeting new consumers such as female drinkers and trying to convert beer drinkers to its liquors.

 

Coppere in March reported “softness” over the key Chinese New Year period, when consumers buy high-priced spirits for celebratory gifts. Pernod, which sells its ABSOLUT-brand vodka and Chivas Regal range of Scotch whiskies on the Mainland, expects net sales growth in China to be between 9 to 11 percent this year, Bogaert has said.

 

The world’s second-largest economy grew 7.7 percent, more slowly than expected in the first quarter, with economists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc among those who have cut China growth estimates since April 19.

 

The growth in the cognac market in Asia is decelerating in 2013 and likely to grow low single digits this year by volumes with the slowdown more evident in premium brands, Philippe Guettat, head of the company’s Martell Mumm Perrier-Jouet, business said today.

 

 

——

Quick Note – Pernod Ricard (RI FP, Neutral) – Feedback from presentation in China

 

Source: Nomura

May 28, 2013

 

European Beverages

Stock Rating: Neutral

Target Price: EUR 104.00

PERP.PA (EUR 95.44)

Ian Shackleton – NIplc

 

Long-term story robust, but see short-term concerns in Asia

Although the long-term story in Asia looks robust and the company benefits from its strong position, especially in China, the company has acknowledged short-term challenges still and is guiding for more normalised medium-term revenue growth rates (high single to low double digit revenue growth) after high single digit in FY13. This is in line with our estimates, where we see FY13 revenue +8pc with some recovery in FY14 (+10pc). As a result, we continue to see more subdued group EBIT growth in FY14 (+6-7pc) after +6pc in FY13 before returning to +8pc in FY15. We continue to prefer investment in Diageo (Buy), given the broader geographical spread and M&A opportunities. Valuation calendar 2014 PE 17.3x vs. Diageo 17.0x and spirits sector avg 18.3x.

 

Investor day presentation

Company hosted the presentations at its investor day in Beijing earlier today. Presentations will be released on the website tomorrow, no webcast available. Further breakout sessions are planned later today. Company is also planning an investor event on innovation in H1 FY14 in Paris. We estimate the Asia/ROW division will account for 46pc of EBIT in FY13, with Asia accounting for 83pc of the division’s sales.

 

Key points from the presentations and Q and A.

Group CEO Pringuet highlighted that, even with some slowdown, Asia has the highest growth potential still for the group. Company is targeting high-single to low double-digit revenue growth from the region going forward (with profits growing faster), after high single digit in FY13, with similar growth rates for cognac and Scotch. Company indicates underlying growth rate in China is c 7pc.

 

Head of Asia flagged 3 key priorities:

1. Be the leader in premium western-style spirits 2. Increase value share (sales) from 35pc to 40pc 3. Achieve double-digit growth Premium western-style spirits; Premium western-style spirits only represent 3pc of Asian spirits. Company prestige plus (over USD84 per bottle) represents a third of sales and company has 45pc share; however, in ultrapremium (over USD300 per bottle) share is only 23pc and co aims to become no 1 here. Company does not rule out buying into local wine and spirits to achieve this.

 

Head of Martell indicated 35pc value share of cognac in region and 32pc of volume share. Martell overindexes in highend, XO+, being 40pc of volume v 20pc for others. However, 2013 has seen some slowdown and rebasing of growth with volumes growing low single digit and price in line with inflation. Going forward, company sees growth opportunity across the region from wider geographies and new occasions (esp. converting beer drinkers). Company now sees more normal stock levels in the Chinese market v historically when supply was limited. Company sees cognac and Scotch both growing revenue high single-digit/low double digit going forward. Recent price increases in China were 3-6pc and these are being rolled out into other countries.

 

Key brands for growth

As well as the core cognac and Scotch brands, company aims to grow Absolut vodka, malt whiskies, champagne and wine. On champagne, co is no2 in the region, with 12pc value share. In premium imported wine, co has no 3 position globally and no 2 in Asia; using the spirits distribution co can leverage this position.

 

Key markets in the region are China, India and Korea, which represent two thirds of revenue. Company sees long-term outlook for western-style spirits to grow 12pa in volumes and 10pc in gross profit in Asia.

 

In China, company aims to grow value share of western-style spirits from 47pc to 50pc and to grow revenues double digit. Key battlegrounds remain leadership in cognac and whisky (90pc of profits). Co benefits from a strong distribution network across China, with 7 tier-1 wholesalers, 340 tier-2 and 600 smaller wholesalers. Co remains optimistic about the mid to long-term opportunity, but acknowledges short-term challenges, which began with the 2011 5 year plan and have led more recently to the anti-extravagance campaigns and advertising restrictions on luxury goods.

 

In India, company also aims to grow value share of premium plus whisky (over USD7) from 47pc to 50pc. It sees volumes in premium plus growing 14pc pa and gross margin 17pc.  Although the Diageo/United Spirits deal may create more competition, it should also help to grow the premium plus category. No new news on import tariff reductions – probably now not until after Indian elections next year.

 

 

——

Washington: State revenues grow from liquor privatization

 

A year after liquor privatization, it looks as though state and local governments are getting more revenue, and customers are paying more.

 

Source: Seattle Times

By Melissa Allison

May 25th

 

A year ago, you couldn’t buy liquor at grocery stores in Washington. Now you can, but you probably pay more for it.

 

June 1 will mark the one-year anniversary of the state’s departure from the liquor business, when it turned sales over to private retailers such as Costco Wholesale and Safeway. The conversion happened at the behest of voters, who approved a Costco-written initiative in the fall of 2011.

 

Back then, only 329 stores – all state-run or contracted with the state – sold liquor in Washington.

 

Now more than 1,400 retailers sell slightly more liquor than the state used to – an average of 2.7?million liters a month since privatization, compared with 2.5?million before.

 

Prices spiked sharply last summer, but the rate of increase has steadily declined. In March, prices were 7 percent higher year-over-year, according to the Washington State Department of Revenue.

 

Additional repercussions from Washington’s conversion include hundreds of former Liquor Control Board workers still collecting unemployment benefits, shoplifting concerns among law-enforcement authorities and possibly more liberal attitudes about alcohol among youth.

 

A key concern in privatization efforts, particularly in an earlier attempt turned down in 2010, was the amount of revenue the government would collect after the change. And so far it’s been a pretty good deal for the state.

 

The state Economic and Revenue Forecast Council projects that spirits taxes and fees will generate $425?million in revenue for fiscal 2013, which ends June 30. About $392?million has been collected already, more than the $309?million the liquor business generated for the state and local governments in fiscal 2011.

 

Legal challenges have dogged implementation, as they do many voter initiatives.

 

One change resulting from the litigation involved the Liquor Board’s interpretation of a provision that allowed retailers to sell only 24 liters of liquor and wine in a “single sale” to bars and restaurants. The Liquor Board decided that meant 24 liters a day, but retailers fought and won the right to buy 24 liters per transaction, with no time limit.

 

That puts many locally owned grocery chains at an even greater disadvantage, said Jan Gee, president of the Washington Food Industry Association, which represents most grocers, except national chains.

 

Prices higher

 

High prices are probably the most divisive issue in the new liquor system.

 

Large retailers, who wrote and financially backed the voter initiative, blame distributors, who fought the measure and lost.

 

“Distributors are taking a huge margin in the middle,” Joe Gilliam, president of the Northwest Grocery Association, said, citing what he estimates as a 30 percent markup.

 

“Over time there will be competition, and distillers will complain,” said Gilliam, whose organization counts Costco, Safeway and other big grocers among its members.

 

The distributors disagree.

 

“My understanding is that (distributors’) margins in Washington are as low as anywhere in the country, and suppliers are not very happy about it,” said John Guadnola, executive director of the Washington Spirits & Wine Distributors Association.

 

And distillers do not appear willing to step in.

 

“You started off with the highest level of taxation in the country and to that added two new fees,” said David Osgood, chief economist for the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States.

 

The voter initiatives included those new fees – assessed on retailers and distributors – to ensure the state nets as much money as it used to from the liquor business.

 

The retailer fee is 17 percent. The distributors pay 10 percent for the first two years they do business in Washington, then the amount drops to 5 percent. For most, fees will drop in the spring of 2014.

 

On top of that, the voter measure required distributors to have collectively paid at least $150?million in fees by March 2013. They were expected to miss that target all along, and the Liquor Board recently sent letters telling them how much they owe.

 

Southern Wine & Spirits, which sold 57 percent of the liquor in Washington in 2012, owes $59.5?million, while Young’s Market, which sold 36 percent, owes $37.7?million. (The next largest distributor is Click Wholesale Distributing, with 2 percent.) All payments are due May 31.

 

No one is sure what will happen after distributors pay off the shortfall and see their fee drop to 5 percent next year.

 

David Trone, president of the Total Wine & More chain, says prices on a lot of popular items are lower, particularly at discounters such as his company and Costco.

 

He has a list of 50 popular products, most in the 1.75-liter category, that Total Wine’s analysis shows are $5.72 cheaper on average than state store prices.

 

For example, a 1.75-liter bottle of Absolut vodka at Total Wine in early April cost $40.33, including taxes, compared with $47.95 at state stores just before they closed last year, the chain says.

 

A comprehensive comparison of pricing is not available because the state, with its exit from the liquor business, no longer tracks individual brands.

 

Net job gain

 

Trone also touts job creation, saying his four stores alone have hired 200 people.

 

Southern Wine and Young’s Market have added more than 1,000 jobs to handle the new business, some at Southern’s new 350,000-square-foot distribution facility in Puyallup.

 

That would offset the 902 Liquor Control Board jobs lost because of privatization. The layoffs included people who worked at the state’s liquor-distribution center in Seattle, which is being bought by Panattoni Development Co. for $23.4?million in a sale expected to close in July.

 

Many of the laid-off employees are still out of work. In April, 458 claimed at least one week of unemployment benefits, according to the Washington Employment Security Department.

 

One worker who did find a job is Pat McLaughlin, the Liquor Board’s former head of business enterprise, who also oversaw the sale of the state’s liquor stores before losing his own job.

 

“I consider myself blessed that my transition was surely easier than most,” said McLaughlin, who now runs the solid-waste division of King County’s Department of Natural Resources and Parks.

 

He still lives in Olympia and takes the Sounder from Lakewood to Seattle for work.

 

Concerns about crime

 

A concern among opponents of liquor privatization was the notion that it would make access to booze easier for minors.

 

The Liquor Board monitors that with store-by-store stings to see if retailers are selling to minors, and the numbers have not changed much.

 

Typically, 5 to 6 percent of stores under the state-run system were found to have sold to minors. Under private retailers, the range since last June is 5 to 10 percent.

 

It may be that youth-alcohol consumption hasn’t changed much, but a survey last fall showed changing attitudes among Washington state youth.

 

“Significantly fewer students in eighth, 10th and 12th grades believe their peers think it’s ‘very wrong’ for someone their age to drink alcohol,” said Julia Dilley, an epidemiologist who also teaches at the University of Washington.

 

That attitude change is an early warning signal, said Dilley, who received a grant from a program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to study how privatization changes consumption patterns.

 

She also plans to study whether changes in consumption are associated with more alcohol-related consequences, such as hospitalizations, crime and traffic accidents.

 

Already, the Washington Traffic Safety Commission has found that the number of fatal crashes involving a drunken driver in the second half of 2012 – 53 – was lower than the same six months in the previous five years.

 

One crime that seems to have risen is shoplifting, possibly because retailers are not as careful about security as the state was.

 

“Some (police) chiefs and sheriffs have noted an increase in shoplifting related to spirits,” said Mitch Barker, executive director of the Washington Association of Sheriffs & Police Chiefs. “There’s no question organized crime is involved. Groups are taking large amounts and selling it on the black market.”

 

Evidence so far is anecdotal, but state Rep. Christopher Hurst, D-Enumclaw, has asked retailers to share information about which stores are experiencing liquor losses and how much.

 

He expects to consider those data soon as part of a working group of the House Government Oversight and Accountability Committee, which he chairs and which has jurisdiction over liquor.

 

Hurst is responding to Washington cities, which reported they do not have the resources to litigate all the spirits-shoplifting cases they are getting.

 

“It’s a lot bigger problem than people expected,” Hurst said.

 

 

——

Delaware: 3 cited for bringing alcohol from Del. into Pa.

 

Source: Philly.com

The Associated Press

Friday, May 24, 2013

 

Pa. – Liquor control authorities in southeastern Pennsylvania have cracked down on those trying to buy tax-free alcohol across the state line in Delaware.

 

Police with Pennsylvania’s Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement conducted checkpoints Friday at two stores in Claymont, Del.

 

The Daily Local News reports (http://bit.ly/13QZV3V) three summary citations were issued for illegal transportation of liquor into Pennsylvania.

 

Officers also confiscated more than 400 bottles of beer, nearly 125 bottles of wine and 15 bottles of liquor.

 

 

——

Russia: Liquor production in Russia drops 23 percent

 

Source: New Kerala

May 25th

 

Production of vodka and other spirits in Russia dropped 23.3 percent in the first four months of 2013 year-on-year to 5.7 million decaliters, a report said.

 

The Federal Statistics Service (or Rosstat) said in a report that beer production declined 10.7 percent compared to the same period last year, to 78.2 million decaliters.

 

Production of wine rose 19.1 percent in the reporting period to 3.5 million decaliters.

 

Production of low-alcohol drinks (defined as those containing less than 9 percent alcohol by volume) fell 9.7 percent.

 

 

——

SAB fosters beer brands in Australia

 

Source: FT

By Neil Hume in Sydney

May 26th

 

A bartender pours a pint of Fosters lager at The Knights Templar public house, operated by JD Wetherspoon Plc, in London, U.K., on Wednesday, Sept. 7, 2011. U.K. retail sales dropped in August as consumers remained concerned about their jobs and incomes, the British Retail Consortium said.©Bloomberg

 

When SABMiller launched an $11.8bn cash bid for Australian brewer Foster’s in 2011, analysts and investors were not impressed.

 

Why would a company known for its exposure to fast-growing emerging markets enter a mature beer market and pay a very full price for the privilege?

 

SAB, which owes its existence to mergers and acquisitions, was not put off. Graham Mackay, then chief executive, said he would “sweat the assets” and “make the numbers work”.

 

SAB last week revealed that Foster’s – also known as Carlton United Breweries – had generated $700m of earnings before interest, tax and amortisation in its first full year of ownership. And more importantly, given the declining market, it announced a 3 per cent increase in underlying beer volumes in the three months to the end of March.

 

Speaking before the results, Ari Mervis, the South African executive in charge of integrating CUB, told the Financial Times that he was encouraged by the performance of the Australian unit.

 

“We expect it to take a good few years to turn the business around and put it on a sustainable platform, but we are very encouraged with where we are at the moment,” said Mr Mervis, SAB’s head of Asia-Pacific.

 

Plans to extract $180m in cost savings by March 2015 from better procurement and lower back-office costs, are running ahead of schedule. Meanwhile, Victoria Bitter, one of CUB’s six core brands, has been successfully repositioned.

 

Analysts reckon SAB has already achieved half the targeted cost-cutting and could deliver a further $60m in the year to March 2014. But the performance of VB, which has just recorded a second consecutive quarter of sales growth, is the most eye-catching.

 

When SAB completed the Foster’s acquisition in December 2011, VB was a shadow of its former self. Over 10 years, its market share had plunged from 25 per cent to less than 12 per cent as its core drinkers – Aussie tradesmen in shorts and singlets – deserted the brand. This followed a disastrous decision to lower VB’s alcohol content to 4.6 per cent to save on excise duty and chase a younger demographic.

 

One of the first things Mr Mervis did when he took control of CUB was to launch a project to save VB as part of a broader plan to put “beer back at the centre”.

 

Mr Mervis and his teams decided to return VB to its roots as a beer for blue-collar tradesmen. They revived its iconic packaging and old advertising slogan: “A hard-earned thirst needs a big cold beer.”

 

VB’s original recipe was also revived, using new production processes to remove preservatives and enzymes, and the alcohol content was boosted to 4.9 per cent.

 

Returning VB to its “full flavour and full strength” has been a success. Since the beer was relaunched in October, it has enjoyed two straight quarters of growth, with sales rising 8.6 per cent in the three months to March. It has also regained the mantle of Australia’s biggest-selling beer, just ahead of XXXX Gold.

 

“It’s given an enormous amount of energy and enthusiasm to the organisation,” Mr Mervis says, adding that it “put our sales guys on the front foot”.

 

With VB stabilised, Mr Mervis says the focus is now on the other CUB brands that “deliver the majority of our volume”, as well as lifting sales of SAB’s international brands, which include Peroni and Miller, in Australia.

 

Although beer drinking in Australia has been declining as wine and spirits have become more popular, the country’s A$5bn ($4.8bn) a year brewing industry still boasts some of the highest margins in the world. This is because the market is a duopoly between CUB and Lion, the food and beverage group owned by Japan’s Kirin.

 

Mr Mervis says there was a “lot of opportunity” for beer in Australia as its “share of throat” is about 40 per cent – lower than both the US and the UK.

 

“The climate, the environment and culture of Australia, certainly lends itself to beer consumption,” he says. “So, we’re very optimistic about the long-term growth.”

 

 

——

Brands by Value preview

 

Source: Drinks International

By Drinks International News Desk

24 May, 2013

 

Brand valuation and marketing company Brand Finance has compiled a ranking of the world’s biggest spirits by  brand value.

 

The full results of Brands by Value will be published on Drinksint.com on June 4 and the June edition of Drinks International magazine, but here we present a first look at ranks 26-50.

 

Brand value in brief

 

Brand value is the amount that an independent third party might pay to buy the trademark and associated intellectual property. For example, Jose Cuervo’s brand value represents Brand Finance’s opinion on how much someone should pay to buy the Jose Cuervo trademark.

 

As part of a brand valuation exercise, the strength of a brand is evaluated against its peers across a number of measures, including emotional connection, financial performance and sustainability, among others. This is used to arrive at a brand rating which ranges from D to AAA.

 

This year’s Brands by Value table continues to see a volume shift towards local brands from developing countries. The potential for these brands, especially from China, is immense and opportunities to develop variants to enhance margin – and, in turn, cross borders – remain. Margin growth remains with the global power brands however.

 

Famous Grouse continues to be the goose that laid the golden egg for Edrington Group. Its brand value is up US$69.6 million to US$398 million following an increase in case sales of 400,000, making it the biggest riser in the table’s lower half. Famous Grouse also has the strongest brand rating at AAA-, suggesting the consumer affection and loyalty needed for continued growth.

 

The table is dominated by Diageo and Pernod Ricard with over half of the 25 brands in the lower half of the table owned by these two companies. Diageo’s Ketel One has enjoyed the second largest jump in brand value, US$65.9 million, bringing its total to US$381 million.

 

Despite the success of Famous Grouse, it has been a less successful year for some other whiskies. Glenfiddich has dropped from 27th in 2012 to 35th in this year’s table after losing US$39 million in brand value. Meanwhile J&B has had an even more difficult year. Following a fall in case sales of 200,000 its brand value has fallen US$46.7 million to US$371 million, pushing out of the top half to 30th place in this year’s list.

 

The methodology

 

Brand Finance calculates brand value using the Royalty Relief approach. This involves estimating the likely future sales attributable to a brand and calculating a royalty rate that would be charged for the use of the brand.

 

The steps in this process include:

 

– Calculate brand strength on a scale of 0-100 according to a number of attributes, such as emotional connection, financial performance and sustainability. This score is known as the Brand Strength Index

 

– Determine the royalty rate range for the alcoholic drinks sector by reviewing comparable licensing agreements sourced from Brand Finance’s database of licence agreements and other online databases

 

– Calculate royalty rate – the brand strength score is applied to the royalty rate range to arrive at a royalty rate. For example, if the royalty rate range in a brand’s sector is 1%-5% and a brand has a brand strength score of 80 out of 100, an appropriate royalty rate for the use of this brand in the given sector will be approx 4%

 

– Determine brand-specific forecast revenues using a function of case sales, average prices and equity analyst forecasts to determine the proportion of a parent company’s revenues attributable to a specific brand

 

– Apply the royalty rate to the forecast revenues to derive brand revenues

 

– Brand revenues are discounted post tax to a net present value which equals the brand value

 

Brand ratings

 

These are derived from the Brand Strength Index which benchmarks the strength, risk and future potential of a brand relative to its competitors on a scale ranging from D to AAA. It is conceptually similar to a credit rating

 

AAA – extremely strong, AA – very strong, A – strong, BBB-B – average, CCC-C – weak, DDD-D – failing

 

 

——

After PBR: Will the Next Great Hipster Beer Please Stand Up

 

Source: Time

By Brad Tuttle

May 26, 2013

 

Pabst Blue Ribbon, the so-called “nectar of the hipster gods,” has been hip for longer than anyone could have possibly imagined. Now that PBR’s popularity is mainstream, and the beer has lost some of its authentic, cheap no-frills appeal, the assumption is that another beverage will take its place as the top hipster brew. But there are reasons why the “next PBR” might never come.

 

The research firm Restaurant Sciences recently released data indicating that not only had Pabst Blue Ribbon prices in bars and restaurants risen substantially-up over 10% from April 2012 to April 2013-but that the entire category of cheap “sub-premium” beer had gotten more expensive due to PBR. “I believe the single biggest driver in sub-premium beer price increases is indeed specifically PBR,” Chuck Ellis, Restaurant Sciences president, told the Daily News. “It has become quite fashionable.”

 

Tons of publications jumped on the study and issued hipster-bashing headlines, usually to the effect of how PBR-loving hipsters “ruin everything,” even cheap beer. But wait a sec. PBR didn’t just become hip recently. It’s been years, in fact, since PBR emerged as the beer of choice of the bearded, Brooklyn-focused masses. In the New York Times magazine, Rob Walker wrote of hipsters embracing PBR thanks to its non-marketing marketing back in the early ’00s. Why would PBR prices be only spiking just now?

 

Well, it’s not clear Pabst’s recent price hike is much of an anomaly at all. Restaurant Sciences only has data for a little over a year, so there’s no way of telling if the latest price increase is unusual, or just part of a years-in-the-making trend. The recession gave inexpensive PBR an extra boost with budget-conscious drinkers, and its popularity allowed the company to increase prices in 2009. AdAge noted that in 2011 beer manufacturers raised the prices of several subpremium brands such as Keystone Light mainly in order to help push consumers into trading up to slightly pricier, supposedly tastier brews like Bud and Coors.

 

So there’s nothing particularly new about rising beer prices, even at the subpremium level. Also, while Restaurant Sciences data focus on the price increases as percentages, it’s easy to see that the figures don’t add up to big cash in terms of your bar tab. A 10% price increase sounds like a lot, but when we’re talking about a PBR draft that costs $2.50, that amounts to a bump of just 25¢. That $2.75 PBR is still way cheaper than the typical $5 or $6 craft pint. And none of those prices are as nonsensical as the absurd $10 or $11 charged for Bud Light in certain Manhattan “whale” restaurants.

 

In any event, as PBR has grown incrementally more expensive and increasingly mainstream, it’s been assumed that the beer will inevitably lose its hipster following. “No product stays hip forever, and at 7 years old, the Pabst boomlet is reaching a generational breaking point.” That’s a quote from a Salon.com post-published in 2008. In 2011, the Pabst Brewing Co. and its portfolio of working-class beers was sold and the headquarters shifted from the Midwest to southern California, of all places. Many thought that the people drinking PBR “because it is unsexy, unpretentious and blue-collar Midwest,” in the words of the Chicago Tribune, would turn away from old-school brew now that it was perceived as a sell-out.

 

And yet here we are, in 2013, discussing how PBR’s popularity is responsible for pricing shifts throughout the entire beer industry, even as the craft brewer movement continues to explode-and has changed the beer marketplace far more than Pabst.

 

So why the fascination with PBR? And considering that hipsters shun the mainstream, why haven’t they turned their tastes elsewhere? Some would argue that some hipsters have, in fact, done just that. Several PBR sister brands-Old Style, Lone Star, National Bohemian-are often in the discussion concerning the “next PBR.” So are a few brews from the world’s largest beer companies, including Natural Light, Hamm’s, and Miller High Life. Then there are regional beers such as Genessee, Narragansett, and Yuengling; they’re all relatively cheap brews, and they’ve all been mentioned by beer industry experts as hipster favorites and potential contenders for PBR’s crown.

 

Despite the fact that hipsters seem willing to pay top dollar for things like artisanal mayonnaise, cheap price is essential for any hipster beer, says Rene Reinsberg, the founder and CEO of the menu advisory company Locu. In March, Locu published heat maps of hipster neighborhoods revealing the availability of PBR in bars and restaurants. “Cheap signifies underdog,” Reinsberg says. “The underdog thing is important to this audience. If a beer is expensive, it doesn’t fit the story. Hipsters are into adopting the underdog.”

 

Such criteria would seem to rule out the possibility of a small craft brewer from becoming the next big hipster success story. Don’t count craft out, though, says Restaurant Sciences’ Ellis. “My own theory is that there’s been such intense competition at the high craft end, there is bound to be a fierce battle for the low end,” he says. “There are so many craft brewers out there, and they’re all trying to break through. There could be someone willing to trade volume for price.”

 

Another wholly unscientific factor in a beer’s rise in popularity could be its nickname. It seems to help a beer’s street cred to have a code name or sorts, perhaps so the “in the know” crowd knows how to order at the bar, and how to recognize fellow enthusiasts. Pabst Blue Ribbon, of course, is shortened into PBR. Natty Boh (National Bohemian), UC (Utica Club), Natty Light, Genny, and ‘Gansett are a few of the others.

 

Speaking of ‘Gansett, the Rhode Island beer appears to be one of the most overt in its pursuit of the hipster drinking crowd. The brand had been dead for a decade before new owners took over in 2005, a time that just so happened to coincidence with PBR’s rise. Since then, Narragansett has kept retail prices low-around $4.99 for a six-pack of 16-ouncers in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic-while making other efforts to appeal to hipsters. Last summer, for instance, the company released retro “Crush It Like Quint” cans, named in honor of the memorable character who drank Narragansett (and crushed the can) in “Jaws.” The company website also features a “‘Gansett Girl of the Week,” who, in addition to enjoying the beer, is usually an enthusiast of some hipster activity, such as roller derby.

 

Mark Davidson, one of the founders of the beer price-tracking site SaveOnBrew.com, says that Narragansett’s active targeting of hipsters could backfire. “You can’t set out to be the beer of choice for a counter-culture,” he explained via e-mail. “Just like you can’t set out to make a viral video.”

 

Davidson says it is silly for hipsters to think they are “fighting the power” by drinking PBR, which is actually brewed by one of the world’s largest beer companies, but it’s equally silly for any company to try to advertise in a traditional way to this group of consumers, who in their minds “don’t want to bend to the will of corporate masters telling them what to drink.”

 

Davidson isn’t sold on any current beer as a replacement for PBR, nor even on the concept that there will ever be another success story like Pabst over the last decade. “Maybe it’ll never happen again. Maybe the next wave will really be into whole milk and label the people who drink 2% as ‘slaves to the corporate teat,'” he joked.

 

What he does know is that beer drinkers are a “predominantly male” group that tends to “spend more time indoors, are less physically active, play more video games, spend more time on their smart phones, are enamored with smarts over looks and tend to be more cynical about their future and the future of the planet.” And what beer will most appeal to them? “One that hasn’t been invented yet,” said Davidson. “But I bet a room of savvy marketers somewhere is thinking the exact same thing.”

 

 

——

Diageo closer to control of India’s United Spirits

 

Source: FT

By Louise Lucas, Consumer Industries Editor

May 27th

 

Diageo, the world’s biggest distiller by sales, has moved a step closer to securing control of Indian peer United Spirits after paying some £300m for a 10 per cent slice of the group’s enlarged capitalisation from a preferential share allotment on Monday.

Announcing completion of the allotment to the Indian stock exchange, the companies also said that Gilbert Ghostine, Diageo’s Asia-Pacific president, would join the board of United Spirits with immediate effect.

 

The move is the second part of a three-step deal valued at about Rp57.2bn ($1bn), which Diageo chief executive Paul Walsh spent years negotiating in on-again off-again talks with mercurial liquor baron Vijay Mallya.

 

The acquisition will give Diageo, maker of Johnnie Walker Scotch whisky, access to United Spirits’ unrivalled distribution network in India, where the alcoholic beverage market is estimated at $6bn and is growing 15 per cent a year.

 

Diageo hopes the takeover will help it build the market for its premium Scotch brands among India’s increasingly affluent middle class. United Spirits controls nearly 60 per cent of India’s drinks market.

 

In a somewhat back-to-front process, Diageo first made a mandatory tender offer for shares it was not acquiring from United Spirits, Mr Mallya and related parties.

 

That offer, which closed on May 15, saw Diageo secure a mere 0.04 per cent – unsurprisingly, since it stuck with the Rp1,440-a-share price paid to acquire shares directly from United Breweries. That price represented a 35 per cent premium over the close on September 24, the day before the talks were announced, but was sharply below the Rp1,755 close on the Bombay Stock Exchange ahead of the mandatory takeover offer.

 

Failure to scoop up more shares neither scuppered the deal nor represented a setback for Diageo. The distiller faced a similar situation in China when it acquired a controlling stake in baijiu maker Shui Jing Fang at a price well below where the shares were trading at the time of the mandatory takeover bid.

 

Moreover, Diageo has stressed that the structure of the existing deal gives it power to appoint the top two executives of United Spirits, and it will also control voting rights as Mr Mallya’s United Breweries will vote with Diageo for four years.

 

There now remains just one step before Diageo secures the 27 per cent stake it is initially seeking. This may yet prove the toughest, and may not complete before the end of the financial year on June 30.

 

 

——

Diageo hit by weak demand for vodka in India

 

Source: Business Standard

May 24th

 

Diageo, the global spirits major which is best known for Johnnie Walker scotch whiskies and Smirnoff vodka, has said that its performance in India was held back by Smirnoff which is declining 2% in a weak vodka category. However, Diageo has added that they have strong underlying momentum in scotch with Johnnie Walker Red and Black growing in strong double digits.

 

Diageo, which is in the process of acquiring stake in India’s leading spirits player – United Spirits, relies on Smirnoff vodka for its volumes here and it is the largest selling brand for them here. In addition to Smirnoff, Diageo sells Johnnie Walker and VAT69 in good numbers, besides a range of few other brands which sell in small volumes.

 

According to industry observers, Smirnoff, which is present in the premium vodka segment in India, still controls around 80% of the market, but it has been hit by slow growth in the vodka segment as a whole. “Many people are opting for whiskies and that is one of the reason why the vodka segment is seeing sluggish growth,” an industry analyst noted.

 

Gilbert Ghostine, President, Asia Pacific, Diageo in recent discussion with investors said that  they are gaining share of the scotch category in India.  Diageo has said that they are able to gain good market share in the scotch whisky segment through the Johnnie Walker bouquet, which is a result of its continued F1 sponsorship programme and Step Inside the Circuit campaign.

 

The global spirits major is also hoping that there will be some sort of a breakthrough on the ongoing discussions between the Indian government and the EU over FTA which also involves India reducing the high import duties on scotch. “On the EU FTA negotiation with the Indian Government, we keep hearing that things are moving in the right direction and the conversation is progressing positively. But, unfortunately, I cannot put a timeframe on this one because we have been in this place before, but they seem closer than they were in the past,” he detailed.

 

According to Diageo, VAT69 also saw double digit depletion growth and in aggregate they are gaining share of the scotch category year-to-date. “Our emerging middle class scotch brands such as Rowson’s Reserve, Haig and VAT69 together are growing in double digits,” Ghostine  added.

 

Diageo has been growing at a decent clip in India over the past few years but has not been able to muscle up to a strong position and hence as and when it consummates the transaction with United Spirits, they will be getting to ride on the expansive and sturdy network across India through which their brands can ride on.

 

Diageo, post the $2.1 billion transaction announced during November 2012 in which it was supposed to get a controlling stake of 53.4 per in United Spirits, has so far managed 0.44% in USL and is expecting to get an additional 10% through a preferential allotment before end of May.  

 

Said Ghostine: “Post the MTO settlement, it will allow us to subscribe for the preferential allotment by the end of May. We believe that then it could put us in a position where we could complete the share purchase agreement by the end of the fiscal year – which is end of June 2013,” he added.

 

 

——

Mine’s a double: Private equity could get twice £75m it paid for bottle maker

 

Source: The Independent

Sunday 26 May 2013

 

The Yorkshire-based firm which makes the bottles for Smirnoff vodka and Grant’s whisky could be sold for £150m later this year.

 

Private-equity group Equistone has hired advisers at Rothschild to review options for Allied Glass, which traces its history back to the 1870s, including a possible sale.

 

Allied supplies glass containers to Diageo and the eponymous maker of Napolina cooking oil.

 

The company has benefited from soaring demand for these and other premium brands in emerging markets, including China, India and Russia. This helped the glass-container maker recently smash through the £100m annual sales barrier.

 

It has hired a French-speaking business-development manager and a multi-lingual sales officer to capitalise on growth opportunities overseas.

 

Allied Glass, which employs 650 staff, also completed a multi-million pound investment in its manufacturing site in Knottingley, West Yorkshire, including a furnace rebuild, to step up its production last month.

 

Equistone, which used to be part of Barclays, acquired the glass specialist in a secondary buyout deal worth £75m from CBPE Capital in April 2010. But Allied Glass’s recent meteoric growth means that the private-equity firm now hopes to secure a price tag of around double that amount. CBPE had acquired the company from Associated British Foods, the conglomerate behind fashion chain Primark, in 2002.

 

Allied Glass made operating profit of £11.5m over the year to December 2011. All parties declined to comment.

 

 

——

Champagne Gets Recognition in China

 

Source: WSJ

By NADYA MASIDLOVER and JASON CHOW

May 27th

 

The world’s most famous bubbles have gained new recognition in China.

 

Chinese authorities have registered Champagne as an official label, according to the Champagne trade organization representing the French brands and grape growers. The move limits the use of the name to sparkling wine made in France’s Champagne region.

 

Chinese authorities have registered Champagne as an official label, limiting the use of the name to sparkling wine made in France’s Champagne region.

 

The new recognition could boost protection of the celebratory drink in a country that is essential to its growth. The Champagne industry sells half of its annual production to French consumers, but the bottles attract higher prices-and sales growth-abroad. Yet Chinese consumers have been slow to order the drink, preferring spirits such as whiskey, Cognac and red wine.

 

But Champagne isn’t crying victory yet. Other countries such as the U.S. have dragged their feet on enforcing stringent protection of the name. The Comité Interprofessionnel du Vin de Champagne, the Champagne trade group, has been lobbying for years to prevent other makers of bubbly from using the famous fizz’s name on wine made outside of the Champagne region.

 

China’s decision will allow Champagne producers to ensure that, as their business grows in the country, they don’t suffer the same fate as in the U.S., where weak legal protection has undermined the segment. Between 45% and 50% of sparkling wine volumes in the U.S. are mis-sold as Champagne, according to Sam Heitner, director of the U.S. Champagne Bureau, the industry’s representative in the country.

 

The use of the Champagne name for other types of sparkling wines is limited in the U.S., where labels of sparkling wine registered after 2006 are banned from calling themselves Champagne.

 

The controversy over the Chinese labeling of Champagne and sparkling wine is a particularly vexing issue to those in China’s wine business because of how the two terms have been translated. Champagne is known in China as “xiang bing”-which includes the character for the word “fragrant”-while sparkling wine is classified as “qi pao jiu,” a term loathed by producers as it includes the word “blister.”

 

The battle of the name gained importance as Champagne sales in China soared in recent years. In 2012, Champagne exports to China-excluding Hong Kong-jumped 52% to two million bottles, making the country the twelfth-largest export market for the festive drink.

 

Nonetheless, the market remains nascent compared with sales of Champagne in Europe or the U.S. China makes up a meager 0.6% of total exports of Champagne. With over 10% of exports, the U.S. is the drink’s second-largest export market, behind the U.K.

 

Champagne houses have worked hard to promote the beverage in China in recent years amid growing demand for high-end beverages. China’s top clubs and karaoke bars stock the drink, and the major brands have been promoting heavily through advertising and publicity stunts. In 2011, Moët et Chandon brought Scarlett Johansson, its celebrity spokeswoman, to China to promote the brand and even auctioned off a dinner date with the actress at a Christie’s wine auction in Hong Kong.

 

Until now, only 0.5% of the wine consumed in China is sparkling wine as Chinese consumers far prefer still wines-especially red wine-over bubbly ones, according to International Wine & Spirit Research.

 

The registration of the name will provide a boost to the existing protection in China, said Wang Wei, head of the Champagne Office in Beijing, in a statement. He added that abusive uses of the Champagne name are “few, rapidly detected and severely punished.”

 

 

——

Aging cases of wine under the SEA gives better taste than identical ones left ashore

 

Source: Daily Mail

By James Nye

27 May 2013

 

A Napa Valley firm hopes to revolutionize the wine industry in the United States by aging bottles in the ocean – with stunning implications for taste and the cost of the wine.

 

In February, Mira Winery became the first company to lower four cases of their 2009 Cabernet Sauvignon 60-feet down into the Charleston Harbor and they returned last week to check on the results of their experiment.

 

The conclusion of the independent blind tasting was that the wine was ‘extraordinary’ – outstripping the same wine aged on the shore in categories such as aroma, taste and finish and being priced at $1,000 a bottle.

 

‘It’s the first time we’ve ever done it – anybody’s ever done it in the United States,’ Mira Winemaker, Gustavo Gonzalez told Foxnews.com.

 

The aim of the experiment was to test ocean-aged wine against warehouse aged wine and to note the affect the seawater has on aging through temperature, humidity, pressure, motion, light and the lack of oxygen.

 

‘Wine making is an art and a complicated science,’ said Gonzalez.

 

‘With several factors that impact wine production, aging is traditionally done in a very controlled environment to ensure optimum outcome.

 

‘With our experiment, we’re testing the impact of unpredictable tides, waves and temperature on the wine’s taste.’

 

The wine was lifted from the sea bed on May 21st and Gustavo was ecstatic about the results.

 

‘I think it’s a whole other element for adding diversity to the flavors that already exist within wine,’ said Gustavo.

 

Jim ‘Bear’ Dyke Jr., the Charleston resident who owns the winery, says the wine will now be sampled and chemically analyzed.

 

Later this year, he said, more wine will be submerged in the harbor for twice as long as the winery continues to experiment with ocean aging.

 

Wine has been aged in the ocean before by wineries both in Europe and on the West Coast. Mira wants to do a systematic analysis of the effects of such aging, Dyke said.

 

‘There is no better place than in Charleston to make history and that is what we have done today,’ he said. ‘Charleston is known as a food and wine destination for its innovation and we believe our southern roots and Napa grapes are adding another chapter to this story.’

 

Winemakers have long known that wine recovered from sunken ships has a unique taste. The ocean is thought to have something to do with that.

 

‘There are definite differences in temperature and pressure, motion and light that we don’t see on land,’ said Gustavo Gonzalez, the winemaker for Mira Winery.

 

Part of the initial experiment was to test the steel cages to make sure they would survive being in the ocean and also to protect the wine, he said.

 

In the second phase, wine will be put into the water right at the beginning of the aging process. The wine that was submerged in February had already been aged for some time on land.

 

‘The idea is to have an even better comparison with wine that has never seen shore aging and has only had water aging,’ he said.

 

The winery bottles its wine in August and September. The next batch of ocean-aged wine will be submerged as soon as it is bottled and will likely remain in the harbor until May or June of 2014, he said.

 

Gonzalez said he’s hopeful that the average wine drinker, not just the connoisseur, will be able to tell the difference in ocean-aged wine.

 

‘I’m hoping that anyone will be able to tell the difference because my feeling is the aging process will be a little slower offshore. The differences, hopefully, are a little more obvious than an expert would require,’ he added.

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2331908/Aging-cases-wine-SEA-gives-better-taste-identical-ones-left-ashore-researchers-planning-industry-revolution.html#ixzz2UZj8hxo8

 

 

——

Chianti Classico econonically unviable for most producers, says Antonini

 

Source: Decanter

by Richard Woodard

Friday 24 May 2013

Chianti Classico’s economic model is unsustainable for many wineries because they cannot recoup the high production costs imposed by its strict rules, according to one of the region’s leading winemakers.

 

Alberto Antonini, the former chief winemaker for Antinori, and whose family estate is Poggiotondo, told Decanter.com the Chianti Classico area – 7,200 hectares (18,000 acres) under vine – is too big to be financially viable for all producers.

 

Antonini, who began his career at Frescobaldi in 1986, was in London to publicise Blends, a collection of wineries from Chianti Classico, Argentina, California and Uruguay overseen by Carlos Pulenta, previously the man behind Trapiche, Peñaflor and Salentein.

 

Antonini welcomed recent changes in the Chianti Classico region, including the introduction of a top tier called ‘Gran Selezione’, which is due to come into force later this year.

 

‘I am not against this,’ he said, ‘but it only makes sense if you are a very successful producer.

 

‘Chianti Classico is in trouble at the moment because I think there are 15-20 producers who are really good, but the whole region is not like that.

 

‘Most of it is sold for peanuts, but the production costs are very high . now you can buy Chianti Classico in bulk for the same price as ordinary bulk Chianti.’

 

Chianti Classico vineyards have a minimum vine density of 4,400 plants per hectare and maximum yields of 7.5 tons/hectare, compared to 4,000 plants and 9t/ha respectively for ordinary Chianti.

 

Blends, the brainchild of Pulenta, Antonini and Argentinian businessman Alejandro Bulgheroni, is aiming to bring premium wines with a strong sense of place to international wine markets.

 

So far, the venture has planted vineyards in a new, cooler, coastal area of Uruguay, and has acquired the Argento brand and Dievole, one of the oldest wine estates in Tuscany, over the past year.

 

Pulenta said he was potentially interested in acquiring wineries in a number of areas in the future, particularly in Europe and especially in France.

 

 

——

Red wines may have premature oxidation problems, say Bordeaux researchers

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Friday 24 May 2013

 

Researchers at Bordeaux university’s faculty of oenology have identified a potential issue with premature oxidation affecting red wines.

 

Denis Dubourdieu, professor at the faculty of oenology (ISVV) in Bordeaux and author of a leading study into premature oxidation in white wines, told Decanter.com, ‘Ten years ago, many people were aware of the premature oxidation problem in white wines, but didn’t want to talk about it. For me, it’s a similar situation now with red wines.’

 

Dubourdieu points to the 2003 vintage as the most obvious example, although any very ripe vintages – such as 2009 – could be at risk. ‘And it is not limited to Bordeaux – any region that makes long-living red wines, from Tuscany to Napa, should be aware of the potential issues.’

 

Red wines have greater natural protection against premature oxidation, as the tannins and phenolics are natural buffers against oxygen. ‘But I have seen issues with a number of classified wines that are potentially storing up trouble for later,’ warns Dubourdieu. ‘The Right Bank is the worst affected because Merlot is so vulnerable.’

 

The warnings signs of premox in reds comes through the appearance of certain aroma markers such as prunes, stewed fruits and dried figs, and is often linked to a rapid evolution in colour, as with whites.

 

Dubourdieu, along with Valérie Lavigne and Alexandre Pons at the ISVV, has found two specific molecules – ZO1 giving the prune aroma and ZO2 giving a stewed fruit smell – that develop rapidly in the presence of oxygen.

 

The causes are numerous, Dubourdieu believes: harvesting later in a bid for riper grapes with low acidity, and winemaking practises including too much new oak barrels, or low doses of sulphur dioxide particularly when coupled with a high pH (over a pH of 4, SO2 loses almost all of its effectiveness).

 

‘These are practices that winemakers are doing with the best intentions,’ Dubourdieu said. ‘Riper grapes, new oak, low sulphur use – these are all things intended to improve the wine and to benefit the consumer. But I would prefer to warn winemakers now that it’s possible to go too far, rather than say nothing simply to be politically correct.

 

 

——

How They Won It: Irell Brings Populism To Koch Wine Fight

 

Source: Law360

By Bill Donahue

May 24, 2013

 

After billionaire William Koch bought some allegedly counterfeit wine at auction, Irell & Manella LLP attorneys won him a $12 million fraud verdict by showing jurors that false labeling is a consumer rights issue that can affect anyone – not just wealthy businessmen.

 

Koch won an auction in 2005 for 24 bottles of purportedly rare Bordeaux, which had been consigned to Zachys Wine Auctions by Internet entrepreneur Eric Greenberg. When Koch discovered two years later what he claimed was proof that the bottles were fakes, he sued Greenberg for fraud, deceptive business practices and false advertising.

 

Following a 13-day trial last month, the members of a New York federal jury sided with Koch. They found that Greenberg had willfully advertised and sold wine that he knew to be counterfeit, handing Koch a combined $12 million in punitive, compensatory and statutory damages.

 

But getting there was an uphill battle for Koch’s attorneys from Irell. Proving fraud in New York requires “clear and convincing evidence,” rather than the normal civil standard for a “preponderance of the evidence.” And goods bought at auctions almost always bear a disclaimer that the buyer is getting them “as is” – a warning that can only be overcome if a plaintiff can show the jury that the seller had some “peculiar knowledge” about the products that it withheld from the purchaser.

 

And, according to Irell’s John Hueston, those hurdles were heightened by how Greenberg’s legal team framed the case: an “imperious billionaire” who had purchased expensive wine from a seller who was unaware that it was fake, who now thought he was “above the law” when it came to disclaimers that are intended shield vendors from liability when they unknowingly resell bad goods.

 

“He was almost laughingly confident in his prospects of prevailing,” Hueston said.

 

The key was to flip that theme on its head. Hueston and his team set out to show that rather than an arrogant billionaire, Koch was a man who could afford to fight a court battle out of principal – the wine only cost $300,000 for a man with an estimated $4 billion in assets – on behalf of consumers everywhere.

 

“No consumers should be bound to these types of disclaimers if the sellers are engaged in fraud or if they have knowledge that there are issues with their merchandise and they’re not informing the consumers of that,” Hueston said of Koch’s basic appeal to the jurors.

 

With that groundwork, Hueston’s team painted a picture of an intentional scheme to sell suspect wine. They argued that Greenberg would push wines on auction houses that he at least knew might pose authenticity issues. If the house accepted it, he’d let them resell it; if not, he would quickly move on to the next house, they said.

 

The team then narrowed the case to the single auction at issue, in which Greenberg had personally helped write up the product description – which Hueston’s team argued contained direct fraudulent representations about the wine’s origins.

 

Other courtroom moves helped along the way. Koch’s attorneys were able to show that a key defense witness had misrepresented his credentials as a college professor, and that a blog post he had written years prior directly contradicted his contention that authenticity can only be tested by actually tasting wines.

 

Hueston also pulled the jurors deeper into the case through the use of interactive presentations. At one point, he and his team handed jury members bottles of wine and a blacklight, allowing them to perform the kind of “sleuth work” that Koch had carried out to show the wine was counterfeit.

 

But the Irell attorneys kept circling back to the central narrative, directly tying what is, admittedly, a hobby of the wealthy to the kind of transactions that could affect any consumers – including the eight New York consumers sitting in the court room getting ready to decide the case.

 

“This is no different than you saving up your money and buying a signed Derek Jeter baseball,” Hueston recalled telling the panel. “You can buy it from a few vendors, but one has knowledge that his ball might be counterfeit. Don’t you have a right to know that information?”

 

On April 12, the jurors agreed. Attorneys for the defendants, who did not return a request for comment on the verdict, have yet to file an appeal of the decision, which has not yet been entered as final judgment.

 

Other than Hueston, Koch was represented by Bruce Wessel, Marshall Camp and Moez Kaba of Irell & Manella LLP.

 

Greenberg was represented by Arthur Joel Shartsis and Frank Albert Cialone of Shartsis Friese LLP and Anthony Paul Coles of DLA Piper.

 

The case is Koch v. Greenberg et al., case number 1:07-cv-09600, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

 

 

——

CHRISTIE’S HONG KONG FINE AND RARE WINES SPRING SALE REALISES HK$48,899,796 / US$6,332,524

 

Source: Christie’s

May 25th

 

On Saturday, May 25, Fine & Rare Wines Sale at Christie’s Hong Kong totaled HK$48,899,796 /US$6,332,524, and was sold 95% by lot and by value.

 

Simon Tam, Head of Wine, China, said: “These results illustrate the wine market’s continuing demand for Bordeaux and investible grades of wines from all over the world. Our auction was well-received by providing in-depth knowledge of this dynamic market and appropriate estimates, which resulted in over 96% of the wine selling within and above its estimate range. In addition, wine collectors enjoyed the added appeal of ‘Perfect Pairings’, pairing recommendations that match a broad range of fine wine to Asian cuisine styles.”

 

Please find the Top Ten Results attached. Related images are available here. http://cshk.myftp.org/2013%20Spring%20Christie%27s%20Hong%20Kong%20Auctions/WINE/Wine%20May%20Sale/Results/Images/

 

——

Austerity whites

 

Source: FT

Jancis Robinson

May 24th

 

There is more cheap red wine than cheap white but here are some whites under £10 worth investigating

 

Only once have I been criticised for the subject matter of my columns on this page. Some years ago a member of the traditional British wine trade ticked me off for stooping to mention some of the bargains then available at mass market retailers. At the risk of riling him, I propose to spend this weekend examining relatively inexpensive wine. Many readers of the FT must be all too aware of the prevailing mood of austerity. And even those who don’t need to save pennies must feel at times that they should.

 

I have been quizzing those who buy large quantities of mass market wine professionally and have enjoyed the euphemisms. “Value wine” is a popular one for wines at the bottom end of the price range. (For the record, I firmly believe there is value at just about every price level apart from the stratospheric.)

 

All are agreed that it is much easier to find – oh, let’s be brave – cheap wine that is red than its white counterpart. For a start, white wine is much more transparent. Any winemaking faults or slight taints tend to be all too obvious, and the main ones in cheap white – apart from the classic old-fashioned faults of oxidation and too much sulphur – are an excess of acidity from underripe grapes, a lack of flavour from excessive yields and, nowadays, occasionally heavy-handed use of oak chips that leaves whites (and some reds) tasting oily and of macerated matchsticks. As Marks and Spencer’s wine buyer Belinda Kleinig admits, they have to look at far more lots when buying or blending suitable whites than of reds.

 

And even after the disastrously short 2012 harvest in so many wine regions outside North America, there is much greater availability of cheap red wine than of cheap white. Prices are keener in Iberia than almost anywhere else and Spanish bodegas are still awash with bargain Garnacha and Tempranillo which, as Laura Jewell, Tesco’s in-house Master of Wine, puts it, have “more character than their equivalent, high-yield Airen white counterparts”. After all, the Garnacha that is still Spain’s most planted grape and of which there is no shortage of old bush vines delivering concentrated flavours in a well-matched warm climate, is the highly respected Grenache of Châteauneuf-du-Pape, hardly a workhorse. But in most Spanish wine regions, other than sherry country and the plains of La Mancha – long planted with the characterless Airen grape, historically destined for distillation into brandy – pale-skinned grapes were always in a minority. Only the far, damp northwest is serious white country, and production costs there are too high to be of interest to a supermarket buyer looking for basic white.

 

France has always been a red wine producer too – and old-vine Grenache in Languedoc and especially Roussillon can also offer some of the best red wine value in wines carrying such names as CôtesCatalanes and Pays d’Oc. There was a brief period when the Languedoc white Picpoul de Pinet looked pretty good value but popularity and the shrunken yields of 2012 have put paid to that.

 

Although it has now been joined by tragically underpriced Muscadet, by far the most important hunting ground for seriously inexpensive white French wine – albeit with fairly high acidity thanks to the Armagnac grapes traditionally planted there – has been Gascony. But even here prices have risen over the past couple of years. There was a time not so long ago that wines labelled Gers or Côtes de Gascogne were retailing for under £4. But that general supermarket base price, for wines of all colours, seems rapidly to have risen to closer to £7, thanks partly to routine increases in UK duty on wine in successive budgets. Initially these Gascon wines, typically based on Colombard and/or Ugni Blanc (called Trebbiano in Italy), were piercingly tart and thin but quality has risen considerably recently. I found Gascon wines the best value of all in a recent tasting of whites under £10 that Tesco has to offer, with a St-Mont blend of local, recently revived, indigenous GrosManseng, Arrufiac and Petit Courbu varieties particularly appealing to the ampelographic archivist in me. But the newish blend of GrosManseng with the Sauvignon Blanc of Bordeaux also works well.

 

I have been trying to find the best white wine value available currently in the UK. This generally but by no means exclusively means hunting on supermarket shelves. Even the specialist importer of natural and nearly-natural wines Les Caves de Pyrène, which specialises in supplying restaurants but will sell to consumers from its base in Artington, Surrey, has some bargains to offer, as you can see from my list of favourites on this page. Ditto adventurous independent importing retailers such as Lea & Sandeman. In France, the Loire is generally underpriced and it is even possible to find the odd bargain white from Alsace co-ops.

 

Italy is rather different from France and Spain. It has long grown oceans of Trebbiano and Sicilian white wine grapes such as Catarratto but, since the worldwide craze for Chardonnay transmogrified into one for Pinot Grigio, it has more recently and mysteriously had oceans of Pinot Grigio available, much of it tasting very cheap indeed. Alas the 2012 harvest has provided an excuse to raise Pinot Grigio prices. M&S buyers (called “winemakers”) have put a lot of work recently into revamping their Italian range and I was particularly impressed by the whites, which seemed free of the vaguely dull and industrial character that can dog cheap white. Each was distinctive and so full of fresh fruit that I had to check these were commercial samples ready for the shelf rather than pre-shipping, untreated tank samples.

 

Buying at this level can be as much about currency as about quality, which is partly why Australia and largely why South America do not feature here. But South Africa, with its extensive plantings of Chenin Blanc and Sauvignon Blanc, can be fertile hunting ground for “value” whites – not least because South Africans themselves have long undervalued their whites.

 

 

——

Alex Guarachi Purchases Sun Chase Vineyard

 

Source: WineBusiness.com

May 24th

 

Alex Guarachi, founder and CEO of Guarachi Family Wines and TGIC Importers, Inc., announced Thursday the purchase of 248-acre vineyard Sun Chase located in the Petaluma Wind Gap area of the Sonoma Coast AVA. The purchase of Sun Chase allows an estate designate for Guarachi Family Wines.

 

“We’re absolutely thrilled and excited. Sun Chase will allow us to take Guarachi Family Wines to the next level,” says Guarachi. “It’s an area proven to produce high-end Pinot Noir and will only further the development of our Pinot Project.”

 

Sun Chase is a state-of-the-art, high density vineyard developed in 2007 situated on the southern side of Sonoma Mountain, an area heavily influenced by cool ocean breezes. There are 24 acres planted to Pinot Noir, with four different clones of grapes, and 18 acres of Chardonnay. These two varietals excel in this region and the quality of fruit is an excellent demonstration of what this vineyard produces.

 

Considered one of the preeminent estates of Sonoma Coast, more than a dozen high-end wineries currently buy grapes from Sun Chase, and Guarachi says he intends to continue supplying these loyal producers.

 

In 2007, after a quarter century of importing and wholesaling wines, judging and assisting in the production and marketing of wines for other wineries, Alex Guarachi established Guarachi Family Wines. Sourced from the most premier appellations – Sonoma Coast and Napa Valley – Guarachi Family Wines focuses on two key varietals, Pinot Noir and Cabernet Sauvignon, offering four distinct hand-selected, luxury wines.

 

TGIC Importers was founded by Alex Guarachi in 1985 to fulfill his vision of introducing South American wine to American consumers. Today TGIC Importers is a national importer representing 18 wineries from around the world, and was recognized by Wine Enthusiast magazine in 2010 as Wine Importer of the Year.

 

 

——

Wine industry optimistic despite labor, import concerns

 

Source: THE PRESS DEMOCRAT

By CATHY BUSSEWITZ

May 23, 2013

 

It’s a time of optimism in the wine industry, with vintners buying vineyards to secure supply, and grape growers and brokers easily selling their crop for hearty prices.

 

But there are issues on the horizon, including a dwindling labor pool and an increase in bulk wine imports from overseas that could ease pricing pressures on domestic grapes and wine.

 

These trends were part of wide-ranging discussions Thursday among 200 vineyard, winery and finance executives at the 18th annual Vineyard Economics Seminar in Napa.

 

Nearly 98 percent of growers and vintners were more profitable last year than the previous year, and 87 percent believe that next year will be even better, according to an annual survey of wine executives.

 

“The winery demand seems to continue unabated,” said conference founder David Freed, chairman of the Silverado Group.

 

Growers in some parts of California are experiencing a shortage of agricultural workers. On the Central Coast, some vineyard owners have been accused of stealing farm workers from other crews, said Steve McIntyre, founder of Monterey Pacific, a vineyard management company in the Central Coast.

 

“The reality is we’re not stealing from any crew. It’s just that people are able to shop around for better wages,” McIntyre said. “If they don’t want to stoop to pick strawberries, they can . pick grapes.”

 

The changing dynamics around immigration and health care policy may reduce the advantage of using labor contractors, McIntyre said. As companies are required to provide health care to legal workers, the costs will be passed along to growers, said Craig Ledbetter, vice president of Vino Farms, a vineyard company based in Lodi.

 

“We really need to think about this as an industry,” Ledbetter said.

 

Despite the tight labor market, the California Association of Winegrape Growers is opposing several bills in the Legislature that would improve conditions for farm workers by increasing the minimum wage and mandating some pay during heat or rest breaks.

 

“Labor remains perhaps the most active and frankly troublesome area in Sacramento,” said John Aguirre, president of CAWG.

 

Meanwhile, imports will likely continue to pose a threat to California grapes and wines, especially if domestic prices remain strong, executives said.

 

“As a group, as an industry, as grape growers, we need to focus on how we’re going to protect our brands,” said Bill Pauli, president of Yokayo Wine Co. in Ukiah. “Collectively we have a lot invested.”

 

 

——

Obituary: Greg “Fretzy” Fretz

 

Source: Alliance Beverage Distributing Co.

May 24th

 

I am very sad to announce the passing of Greg “Fretzy” Fretz, our co-founder and sales manager. Fretzy died unexpectedly early Saturday morning after seeming to be recovering well from his battle with cancer. He was working with his old energy and excitement up until the evening before. Phoenix Ale Brewery and the Arizona beer community have lost one of the great natural beer sales guys.

 

He was energetic, gregarious and entertaining, but also a determined competitor. More importantly, we have lost a great friend and we will all miss him greatly. After working for 15 years selling beer for breweries from elsewhere, Fretzy’s dream was to open a brewery in Arizona. I am glad to say that he realized that dream and his name will live on in an industry he so loved. We send our condolences to Fretzy’s wife, Stacie, his young -family, and the rest of his loving family.

 

Please find time in your day to raise a glass for Fretzy.

 

 

—–

Belgian grocer Delhaize looks to sell two U.S. units – sources

 

Source: Reuters

By Olivia Oran

Thu May 23, 2013

 

Belgian grocer Delhaize is looking to sell two of its U.S. businesses as it continues to cut costs in the region, according to two sources familiar with the matter.

 

The Food Lion parent has hired Lazard Ltd to sell its Harveys and Sweetbay supermarket businesses, the sources said.

 

Chief Executive Officer Pierre-Olivier Beckers said the company was looking at options for the units, but declined to comment directly on whether advisors had been appointed to conduct the sale.

 

“This is a question on the table at the moment,” he told Reuters on the sidelines of the company’s annual shareholders meeting.

 

Lazard could not be reached immediately for comment.

 

Delhaize made about 65 percent of its 2012 revenue of 22.7 billion euros ($29.7 billion) in the United States, mainly through its Food Lion and Hannaford chains.

 

Harveys, which operates 73 supermarkets in Georgia, South Carolina and Florida, focuses on selling regional and fresh products.

 

Sweetbay, which had 105 stores in Florida at the end of 2012, caters to the Hispanic market.

 

In January, Delhaize said it would close 34 Sweetbay stores, most of them money-losing.

 

Beckers, who joined the company as CEO in 1999, announced in early May that he was stepping down.

 

Delhaize and other traditional grocery chains have come under pressure recently, with discounters like Costco Wholesale Corp and mass retailers like Wal-Mart Stores Inc gaining footing as shoppers’ budgets have dwindled.

 

 

——

Club Med to be taken over in ?540m deal

 

Source: FT

By Scheherazade Daneshkhu in Paris

May 27th

 

Club Méditerranée is to be taken over by its biggest shareholders in a friendly deal that values the French holiday resort group at ?540m.

 

Paris-based Axa Private Equity and China’s Fosun International said on Monday they would tender ?17 a share – a 23 per cent premium to Friday night’s close of ?13.85.

 

Shares in Club Med jumped 23 per cent on Monday, reaching ?17.02 in early Paris trading.

 

“The board took note of the friendly character of this offer,” Club Med said in a statement. “The board will meet again after the delivery of the report by the independent expert to provide its reasoned opinion on the terms of the tender offer.”

 

Henri Giscard d’Estaing, chief executive, would remain in post, according to the offer. He has sought to modernise the image of Club Med – founded in 1950 – by taking it upmarket and extending its appeal outside Europe. One target is to make Chinese holiday makers its second-largest customer base within three years.

 

Fosun, which owns almost 10 per cent of the company, and Axa, which has 9 per cent, said they made the offer because Club Med needed “to be free from short-term constraints” to implement its strategy given the “difficult trading environment of the tourism market in Europe, in particular France”.

 

 

——

Spain: Zamora takes on Jose Cuervo – report (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just-Drinks

By Andy Morton

24 May 2013

 

Grupo Zamora is to replace Diageo as the distributor of Jose Cuervo Tequila in Spain, according to reports.

 

The Madrid-based spirits and wine brand owner will take over from July, Alimarket said today (24 May). The news portal said Diageo will continue to distribute its “premium” Tequila Don Julio in Spain.

 

 

——

Chile: Chilean Beverage Company CCU Seeks $694 Million Capital Increase

 

Source: Dow Jones

May 27th

 

Chilean beverage company Compania Cervecerias Unidas SA’s (CCU, CCU.SN) seeks to raise some $694 million through the issue of new shares, the company said in a Monday filing with the local securities regulator.

 

CCU will use the proceeds of the issue to finance its organic and inorganic expansion plans while maintaining a solid financial positions, according to the filing.

 

After Sunday board meeting, the company called for a June 18 shareholder meeting to vote on the capital increase.

 

CCU, which has operations in Chile, Argentina and Uruguay, makes and bottles beer, soft drinks, mineral water and fruit juices. It also distills pisco-grape brandy and rum.

 

It has beverage licenses for products from Heineken NV (HINKY, HEIA.AE), Anheuser-Busch InBev NV (BUD, ABI.BT), PepsiCo Inc. (PEP), Paulaner Brauerei AG, Schweppes Holdings Ltd., Guinness Brewing Worldwide Ltd. and Nestle SA (NSRGY, NESN.VX).

 

The beverage company is controlled by the local Luksic family, which also controls London-listed mining company Antofagasta PLC (ANFGY, ANTO.LN), Banco de Chile (BCH, CHILE.SN) and shipping Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA (VAPORES.SN).

Our Website

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Find Us On Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/franklinliquorsMA

Follow Us On Twitter

http://www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

 

Liquor Industry News 5-20-13: Memorial Day Sale

May 20, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Monday May 20th

Biodynamic ROOT Day

Todays Industry News

April, 2013, Control State Results

 

Source: NABCA

May 17th

 

During April, nine-liter spirits case sales in the control states were up 3.3% compared to same month last year sales. Rolling-twelve month reported volumes grew at 3.2%, up from March’s 3.0%. Alabama, Idaho, Iowa, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming reported monthly growth rates exceeding their twelve month trends.

 

Control state spirits shelf dollars were up 5.9% during April while trending at 6.1% during the past twelve months. Alabama, Iowa, Idaho, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming reported growth rates exceeding their twelve month trends.

 

Price/Mix for April slipped to 2.6% from March’s 3.2%.

 

During April, Irish Whiskey, with 0.8% share of the control states spirits market, was the fastest growing category with 18.5% growth reported and a twelve month growth trend of 18.1%. Vodka, with 34% share, grew during the same periods at 2.9% and 4.4%. During April, Canadian Whiskey, Cordials, Domestic Whiskey, Gin, Irish Whiskey, Neutral Grain Spirits, and Tequila grew at rates that exceeded their twelve-month trends.

 

April’s nine-liter wine case sales growth rate fell 1.4%. Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Utah, Mississippi, Montgomery County Maryland, and Wyoming reported -3.9%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 3.2%, -0.1%, and 13.1%, respectively. April’s rolling-twelve month wine volume growth, 5.0%, nearly mirrored March’s 5.1%.

 

 

——

Missouri: Liquor bill blocked at session’s end

 

Source: Post Dispatch

By Elizabeth Crisp

May 18, 2013

 

A contentious liquor bill that had been the topic of intense lobbying at the Capitol this session didn’t make it to a vote before the session’s end today.

 

Lawmakers wrapped up at 6 p.m., with the bill aimed at regulating the link between alcohol suppliers and distributors blocked in the Senate.

 

The proposed legislation would have made it more difficult for alcohol suppliers to sever their relationships with distributors by deeming those relationships as “franchises.”

 

A 2011 federal court ruling overturned a state law that had been governing the relationship between suppliers and distributors since 1975, prompting some of the country’s largest liquor suppliers to file lawsuits to end their contracts with local distributors.

 

Opponents of the legislation, modeled from the pre-2011 system, have argued that attempted to insert government into activities that should be left to the free market.

 

A group of opponents, dubbed Missourians for Fair Competition, praised the bill’s failure today, saying that it would have given the state’s largest liquor distributor “monopoly protections.”

 

“We will continue to fight for legislators who stand for a free market economy because they understand that competition will help create jobs and move this state forward,” Missourians for Fair Competition spokesman Ed Rhode said.

 

Meanwhile, proponents argued the bill would have saved jobs and re-established a system that had been in place since Prohibition.

 

Sue McCollum, CEO of St. Louis-based Major Brands, the state’s largest liquor distributor, said the company, which employs more than 700 people in the state, would now concentrate on rebuilding itself following lawsuits that severed its relationships with its two largest suppliers. The two suppliers – Diageo Americas and Bacardi USA – accounted for 50 percent of its spirits business, she said.

 

“We had enough support and nearly enough momentum. We just ran out of time,” McCollum said. “Major will continue to fight for Missouri jobs, our customers, and consumers.”

 

The liquor franchise legislation – proposed in both the House and Senate earlier this year – had stalled in committee for much of the session but it was revived in the final weeks when the House tied it to an unrelated beer bill.

 

After senators raised objections when the bill hit the floor earlier this week, Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Glendale, said he tried to address some of the concerns, including a provision that would have made the law retroactive.

 

“What I heard was go to conference and deal with the retroactivity and we’ll pass it in a day,” he said. “That’s what I did.”

 

Throughout the session, lawmakers were bombarded with calls and emails from supporters and opponents of the liquor legislation. Online ads urged Missourians to call their local reps and urge action on the bill.

 

Nearly three dozen lobbyists worked the issue in the halls of the state Capitol. St. Louis Mayor Frances Slay also made several trips to the Capitol to lobby in favor of it.

 

 

——

Ohio: AB-InBev Scoops Up Beer Distributor Ahead Of New Law

 

Source: Law360

By Karlee Weinmann

May 17, 2013

 

Beer titan Anheuser-Busch InBev NV will swallow up an Ohio beer distribution company in a deal that is expected to close within the next three months, before a new state law takes effect that would bar brewers from owning booze distributors.

 

Financial terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Neither Anheuser-Busch Cos. Inc., a subsidiary of AB-InBev, nor the family-owned C&G Distributing Co. Inc. offered up a financing breakdown, staying tight-lipped on details except to say the sale would close in the “near future.”

 

C&G, operated by the Cecala and Guagenti families for the past six decades, has sold AB-InBev products across a nine-country swath in western and central Ohio since the 1960s. By absorbing the distributor, the brewer adds to an 800-employee Ohio business that already includes a 40-year-old Columbus brewery and sales across a chunk of the state.

 

“This investment reinforces our commitment to providing local retailers with exemplary service and consumers with a broad portfolio of brands and unique beers,” Anheuser-Busch Sales Vice President Kevin Feehan said in a statement. “We look forward to growing our brands and enhancing competition in this market, which will benefit west-central Ohio retailers and consumers.”

 

But the purchase is opportunistically timed, squeezing in a few months before a deadline imposed by Ohio lawmakers for stemming brewers’ ownership of distributors. Legislators passed a bill earlier this year that bans brewers from buying beer distributors – a provision AB-InBev had fought, including in meetings with Ohio Gov. John Kasich before he signed the bill.

 

The legislation favored smaller craft brewers, which have cropped up with increasing frequency in Ohio and around the U.S. Meant to insulate them from their outsize competitors – such as AB-InBev, whose product arsenal includes the Budweiser, Michelob and other popular names – small breweries mounted an effort to support the law. The Ohio Wholesale Wine and Beer Association was also one of its strongest allies.

 

Representatives for Anheuser-Busch could not immediately be reached for additional comment, but a representative told a local newspaper that the law would not impact the transaction because it would be buttoned up before the law takes effect later this year. Still, the representative said, the provision will stifle business moving forward by blocking off wholesalers from having a distribution business, discouraging new investments.

 

Similar legislation is working its way through several other state capitols. The restrictions are meant to safeguard competition within the beverage industry by keeping distinct its manufacturing, distribution and retail segments.

 

AB-InBev preemptively agreed to divest its minority stake in Chicago beer distributor earlier this year after it became increasingly likely that that state’s House and Senate would approve a new law that prohibits brewers from having any direct interest in distribution outfits, a harder stance than Ohio’s legislation.

 

The Illinois bill cleared the senate earlier this week and is now sitting on the governor’s desk.

 

Counsel information in the latest deal was not immediately available.

 

 

——

Cognac shipments up +7% in April; exports stabilising       

 

Source: Barclays

May 17th

Global Cognac shipments rose +7% in April, an encouraging turnaround from the -7% reported in March, and especially against a tough +10% comparable. Exports rose 8% (-6% in March, +14% in April-12), aided by strong shipments into the US. Domestic shipments also rose strongly, up +19%, but was against an easier -29% comparable. 12-month rolling industry volumes are now up +2.2%.

Asian shipments rose +9%, against a very tough +41% comparable. This is a sharp improvement from the -18% reported last month. Chinese volumes fell -21%, following the -29% drop in March, but was cycling a +79% result given the timing shift of Chinese New Year (CNY) shipments. We note this is the final month of tough comparables in China, with May and June 2012 both up c.20%. Singaporean shipments (the largest Asian market) rose +39% vs. the -9% fall in March, but Hong Kong shipments fell -13% following the -40% drop in March. Both are markets where most of the Cognac product ends up moving into China, and if we take both these into account, then we estimate overall exports into China rose +9%, compared to the -21% drop in March. The 12-month trend is now up +4% for China.

The US, the largest global export cognac market (c.30% of exports), reported shipments up a strong +24% (+1% in March), against a -3% comparable. However, the key European markets remained weak with the UK down -25% (+15% in March) and Germany down -1%. Interestingly, Nigeria has entered the dataset and is currently the 14th largest export market for Cognac. The market is already of similar size to Canada, Russia and Taiwan and reported growth of +202%, albeit of a low base.

While volatility persists within the monthly trends from Asia, given the CNY timing impacts, we believe the focus remains on the extent of the price increases taken by the industry in March/April. Given the robust price/mix dynamics of the category and the attractive industry TSRs, we remain fundamentally positive on the major spirits companies and reiterate our Overweight recommendations on Diageo (PT 2400p) and Pernod (PT EUR107). However, given the recent concerns over the future for gifting/banqueting sales and the underlying level of consumer off-take in the region, we accept Pernod may struggle to make significant headway until greater trading clarity is established. Diageo remains our preferred play for now given its leading position in the growing US market, benefits still to come from the United Spirits acquisition and lower relative forward multiple.

 

——

During first 4 months of 2013, Craft, Premium Plus, and Ciders continued taking share from Premium Light, Imports, and Premium Regular beers

 

Source: GuestMetrics

May 20, 2013

 

According to GuestMetrics, the shifts in consumer preferences that took place in the beer category in full service restaurants and bars during 2012 continued during the first four months of 2013.  

 

“Similar to what we saw take place in 2012, during the first four months of 2013, Craft, Premium Plus, and Ciders continued to take share from Premium Light, Imports, and Premium Regular beers,” said Bill Pecoriello, CEO of GuestMetrics LLC.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, the unit share trends of the main beer segments during 2011, 2012, and the first 16 weeks of the year through 4/21/13 were as follows:  Craft share of beers purchased increased from 13.7% in 2011 to 15.0% in 2012 to 15.6% in 2013 YTD; Premium Plus increased from 11.1% to 11.6% to 12.1%; Ciders/FMB/PAB increased from 0.5% to 0.6% to 0.8%; Premium Light decreased from 32.1% to 31.0% to 30.4%; Import decreased from 25.6% to 24.8% to 24.4%; and Premium Regular decreased from 6.8% in 2011 to 6.5% in 2012, and has remained at 6.5% in 2013 YTD.

 

“To account for any type of seasonality that might take place in the category, especially during the January through April period, we also looked at the unit share trends with respect to year-over-year changes for 2012 vs. 2011, and for the first 16 weeks of 2013 vs. the first 16 weeks of 2012, which told a very similar story,” said Peter Reidhead, VP of Strategy and Insights at GuestMetrics.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, in terms of the y/y change in unit share:  Craft’s gain was +1.3 points both in 2012 and 2013 YTD (we note that in the last 4 weeks Craft share was actually up 1.6% vs year ago April); Premium Plus saw a slight acceleration from +0.6 points to +0.7 points; Cider/FMB/PAB also saw a slight acceleration from +0.2 points to +0.3 points (as we’ve noted before Cider is growing at around a 70% clip in on-premise this year); Premium Light’s share loss accelerated from -1.1 points to -1.5 points; Import saw a slight improvement from -0.8 points to -0.7 points; and Premium Regular was at -0.3 points in both periods.

 

“Looking at the nearly 30 different beer styles we track, the largest share gainers continued to be India Pale Ale, Belgian Wit Ale, and Bitter Pale Ale, coming at the expense of Pale Lagers,” said Pecoriello. “I.P.A. in particular continues to register robust unit growth, which accelerated from 40% in 1Q13 to about 43% during the most recent 4 weeks, so there’s no sign of I.P.A. losing steam.”

 

“As we are seeing across all the alcohol categories, consumer tastes are rapidly evolving, so we believe it is critical for restaurant operators to have detailed knowledge of these trends in order to carry the optimal menu offerings at the right prices,” said Brian Barrett, President of GuestMetrics.  

 

 

——

Mallya readies platform for 10% preferential allotment to Diageo

 

Share purchase agreement to follow soon; Whyte & Mackay issue still hanging fire

 

Source: Business Standard

May 19th

 

Nearly six months after signing a landmark deal with Diageo, liquor baron Vijay Mallya, is preparing the stage to make the 10% preferential allotment in his flagship United Spirits to global spirits major Diageo.

 

This move follows the tepid response to the open offer by Diageo to the public shareholders of United Spirits, in which Diageo managed to get hardly 0.44% of the intended 26%. It is understood that the preferential allotment of 10% will happen before May 26 th , 2013, for which Diageo will be paying Rs 2,094 crore.

 

Post this, Diageo’s move to acquire a further 17.4% stake for Rs 3,632 crore will depend on how the Judge at the Karnataka High Court will deliver his judgement after hearing winding up petitions of UB Holdings, filed by unsecured creditors of Kingfisher Airlines.

 

As part of the multi-pronged Rs 11,165 crore agreement signed between Diageo and Vijay Mallya during early November 2012, Diageo was supposed to get 12.8% stake from UBHL’s holdings in United Spirits and another 6.5% by buying treasury shares in United Spirits.

 

“At the end of all arguments at the Karnataka High Court during last week, the Judge has reserved the judgement. We are hoping that the judgement will not be delayed much,” senior advisors for the UB Group told Business Standard.  “There is a strong opinion in the legal circles that UB Holdings is not a fly-by-night operator,” they added.  The share purchase agreement is understood to be valid till six months, post the open offer which concluded on April 26, 2013.  

 

UB Holdings in an effort to seek Karnataka HC’s nod to sell its shares to Diageo had submitted to furnish a deposit of Rs 100 crore and has said that they will be able to clear the dues towards the unsecured creditors post the transaction with Diageo.

 

As and when Diageo gets to the 27.4% mark in India’s largest spirits company – United Spirits, the board of United Spirits had earlier signed the agreement that they will be voting in favour of the decisions taken by Diageo, even if they (Diageo) do not get the 50.1% control in United Spirits.

 

Even as Diageo is waiting in the wings to take charge of managing United Spirits, they along with Mallya are understood to be actively working on how to address the concerns of Office of Fair Trade in London over owning majority control of Whyte & Mackay, the subsidiary of United Spirits in Scotland which has large reserves of scotch. According to industry observers, Diageo may have to offload majority stake in Whyte & Mackay to clear this hurdle and steps are being taken in this regard. Advisors to UB Group however indicated that they have around six months to address that issue post the closure of the deal of the transaction in India.

 

 

——

India close to Scotland in whisky brand race

 

At the end of calendar 2012, McDowell’s No. 1 from Vijay Mallya’s United Spirits Ltd overtook Johnnie Walker to become the world’s largestselling whisky by volume.

 

Source: Times of India

Anshul Dhamija

May 18, 2013

 

India’s battle with Scotland over whisky supremacy has reached a tipping point with its liquor coming very close to dethroning its highbrow Scottish rivals.

 

A list of 50 millionaire global whisky brands has 19 Scotch blends, 17 of Indian origin and American bourbon coming up a distant third with six millionaire brands. The portfolios of Canada, Japan and Ireland also figure in the list.

 

Industry observers said India might have had just 5-6 millionaire Indian whisky brands six years ago. The Millionaires’ Club 2013 is a report on the emerging giants in the global spirits industry by Drinks International. It says how Indian whiskys, comprising regional brands manufactured by both domestic and international players, are overtaking their Scotch rivals. At the end of calendar 2012, McDowell’s No. 1 from Vijay Mallya’s United Spirits Ltd overtook Johnnie Walker to become the world’s largestselling whisky by volume, clocking sales of 19.5 million (of nine-litre cases) and logging 21% growth over the previous year. Of the top five millionaire alcoholic beverage brands in the world, four are regional brands.

 

South Korea’s soju brand Jinro clocked sales volumes of 65.3 million (of nine-litre cases) in calendar 2012. Smirnoff Vodka, manufactured by the world’s largest spirits manufacturer Diageo, is the only global brand to feature in the top five millionaire list at No. 3 with volumes of 25.8 million (of nine-litre cases).

 

Ginebra San Miguel gin and Emperador brandy, both from the Philippines, are in the top five millionaires’ list with sales volumes of 23.8 million and 31 million (of nine-litre cases), the largest in their categories.

 

“The growth of scotch could not catch up with that of Indian whisky. So the number of Indian whisky millionaire brands will definitely overtake scotch in three years, if not earlier,” says industry veteran Vijay Rekhi. He adds that besides the domestic demand for Indian whiskeys countries in Africa are now taking to them. In the fiscal 2013, India’s spirits market touched sales volumes of 275 million (of nine-litre cases), of which the whisky segment accounted for over 50% with volumes of 150 million clocking annual growth figures of 12% to 14%.

 

Fuelling the growth is an increasing consumption of whisky in India with more youngsters and women taking to drink whisky tall: from 60ml to 120ml of spirit, shaken or stirred.

 

“In India, whisky is now positioned as a contemporary and stylish drink; earlier image was that it’s a drink consumed by 40-plus men sitting beside a fireplace on a leather armchair,” says Sandeep Arora, director of Spiritual Luxury Living, a company that offers whisky experi–ences, apart from dealing in luxury spirits. Last year, in a bid to reach out to the youth Beam Global, makers of the renowned blended Scotch whisky, Teacher’s, had launched a ready-to-drink (RTD) whisky product, a first of its kind in the Indian RTD market- Teacher’s & Cola and Teacher’s & Soda.

 

 

——

NABCA News

 

Source: NABCA

May 17th

 

NABCA recognizes and appreciates Edmund J. Schmidt, director of the Wyoming Department of Revenue and Cassandra Skinner, chair of the Oregon Liquor Commission for their service to the Board of Directors. Both have announced they are leaving their respective posts.

 

Ed was appointed to his position by Governor Dave Freudenthal in February 2003. Prior to joining the Department of Revenue, he served for five years on the State Board of Equalization, a panel of administrative law judges hearing tax appeals from final decisions of the Department of Revenue and county boards of equalization. In 1999 was elected chairman of that board.  He joined the NABCA Board of Directors in 2003 and served as chairman from 2007-2008. Ed was instrumental in forming NABCA’s Public Health Advisory Committee, which counsels the association about various alcohol and public health issues.

 

Cass was appointed by Oregon Governor John Kitzhaber to her position on the Board of Commissioners on July 5, 2011. She had been a member of the OLCC’s Board of Commissioners since June 2009. She is general counsel and health equity officer for Trillium Community Health Plan in Eugene, Oregon. She joined the NABCA Board of Directors in 2011 and served on several committees during her time at the association.

 

 

——

Leaked report points to LVMH secret operation on Hermès

 

Source: FT

By Hugh Carnegy and Scheherazade Daneshkhu in Paris

May 19th

 

LVMH, the luxury goods company headed by Bernard Arnault, undertook a secret operation to build its controversial stake in Hermès, its smaller French rival, according to a leaked report from France’s stock market regulator.

 

The report, “vigorously contested” by LVMH, added an incendiary new twist to an acrimonious battle between the two companies.

 

The dispute erupted when LVMH announced in October 2010 that it held 17.1 per cent of family-controlled Hermès, which floated in 1993, in apparent breach of regulatory thresholds to declare stakes of 5, 10 and 15 per cent.

 

It triggered an inquiry by the regulator AMF and the filing of separate lawsuits by 176-year-old Hermès, famous for its scarves and bags, as it fought to fend off the unwelcome intrusion by LVMH, whose brands include Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior and Dom Pérignon champagne.

 

LVMH, which now owns 22.6 per cent of Hermès, has always maintained that its intentions were friendly and that it had not intended to acquire the stake, saying it opted to take shares instead of cash to avoid paying a big capital gains tax bill on Hermès equity swap derivatives that it held.

 

Mr Arnault, chairman and chief executive, told shareholders at LVMH’s annual meeting last month that the group had ended up with the stake “in an unexpected manner”.

 

But according to a report prepared for the AMF’s sanctions committee, leaked to Le Monde newspaper, LVMH first considered acquiring shares from Hermès family members and on the open market. Instead, it mounted an operation from 2007 under which it used a series of subsidiaries and banks to acquire equity swaps in tranches adding up to 12.2 per cent of Hermès but which did not individually exceed 5 per cent and which were “undetectable by the public”. These were later converted into shares.

 

The report said the earlier acquisition by LVMH of a 4.9 per cent stake in Hermès in 2001-02 was completed via vehicles in Luxembourg, the US state of Delaware and Panama that were not detailed in the group’s consolidated accounts.

 

In a statement, LVMH, which has always maintained that it acted within the law in its use of equity swaps, said it intended “to vigorously contest the conclusions contained in this report” when the group appears before the AMF’s sanctions committee on May 31 to defend its actions. It insisted it would prove “the absence of any wrongdoing by LVMH towards the law and [AMF] rules”.

 

The AMF said in October last year that it had found evidence of “wrongdoing” and asked the sanctions committee to decide whether to impose penalties on LVMH. On Sunday, it said it had “no comment on a file which will shortly be examined by the sanctions committee”. Hermès also declined to comment.

 

Patrick Thomas, Hermès’ chief executive, said last month that the company had discovered “damning” evidence, leading it to take legal action against LVMH. It filed two suits last year that are independent of the AMF inquiry.

 

LVMH filed a countersuit alleging “slander, blackmail and unfair competition”.

 

The Hermès legal action suggests that it does not believe the AMF’s final decision will go far enough in forcing LVMH to give up or slash its shareholding.

 

The AMF has said that France’s rules on stakebuilding were “badly formulated”, and its recommendation to include equity swaps among instruments that count towards shares had been ignored when France tightened its disclosure rules in 2008.

 

The LVMH stake has left a free float of less than 7 per cent in Hermès, since the Hermès family controls the company with a 72 per cent share and a corporate structure that makes it virtually impervious to take over – unless the family itself were to disunite.

 

 

——

ABL Announces Policy Seminar: “Drunk Driving: Where are we and what do we need to do?”

 

Timely Conference Program Will Discuss the Effect of a .05 BAC Change

 

Source: ABL

May 17th

 

American Beverage Licensees (ABL) announced today that it will host Drunk Driving: Where are we and what do we need to do?, a seminar on drunk driving policy as part of the ABL Annual Conference on June 10, 2013.  The seminar will be conducted by Bill Georges, President and CEO of The Georges Group, which advises public and private entities on law enforcement and prevention efforts regarding beverage alcohol.

 

The seminar will take place less than a month after the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recommended that states lower their BAC laws from .08 to .05.  The proposal has been met with tepid support by a number of highway safety groups, but is nonetheless expected to come up in state legislatures in 2014, if not sooner.

 

“As the public, media, legislators and industry consider the implications of this week’s recommendation by the National Transportation Safety Board that states cut BAC limits nearly in half, we’re excited to have Bill share his insights and thoughts,” said ABL Executive Director John D. Bodnovich.   “I am looking forward to hearing from a former law enforcement officer and expert on responsibility issues speak on how we can all work effectively to continue the fight against drunk driving.”

 

ABL has long been involved in the policy discussion over alcohol-related traffic safety measures and drunk driving.  In addition to recent developments in this area, the seminar will include an update on current and emerging technology, including ignition interlocks, and other drunk driving policy trends.

 

Mr. Georges spent nine years as senior vice president of The Century Council, a national, not-for-profit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C., whose mission is to develop programs, strategies and tactics to fight alcohol misuse, drunk driving and underage drinking. He was responsible for overseeing the development, distribution and implementation of the Council’s award-winning programs and was also involved in related government relations and communications efforts.  

 

A retired twenty-five year veteran of the Albany, New York Police Department, he ultimately achieved the rank of Assistant Chief/Chief of Patrol, and was temporarily assigned to the United States Department of Transportation headquarters in Washington, D.C., where he worked on various national law enforcement initiatives.

 

For more information about the 2013 ABL Annual Conference or to register, visit us online at www.ABLUSA.org/Conference.

 

 

——

Blurry Line on Pot-DUI Cases

 

Amid Relaxed Laws, Officials Wrestle With How to Determine Who Is Impaired

 

Source: WSJ

By ZUSHA ELINSON

May 19th

 

As some states relax laws on pot possession, lawmakers are struggling to create rules for how police officers should identify motorists who are driving under the influence of marijuana.

 

The problem: Identifying pot impairment isn’t as clear-cut as testing for alcohol. There is no broad agreement over what blood level of THC-marijuana’s psychoactive ingredient-impairs driving. Breathalyzers can’t detect marijuana levels, and only a small percentage of police officers are trained to authoritatively identify pot-DUI cases.

 

When voters in Washington state legalized recreational pot use last fall, they decreed that drivers with five nanograms or more of THC per milliliter of blood-a level that some studies suggest is associated with increased accident risk-are under the influence. In Colorado, which also last year legalized pot possession, lawmakers passed a bill earlier this month that sets the same limit, but gives drivers a chance to prove that they weren’t impaired. In Montana, where medical marijuana is legal, the governor signed similar legislation last month.

 

But the correlation between THC levels and impairment isn’t scientifically straightforward, said R. Andrew Sewell, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Yale School of Medicine. He said the compound leaves the blood quickly and that regular pot smokers who have built up a tolerance and maintain higher levels may not be impaired at the new legal limits. Setting these limits “is going to cause a lot of impaired drivers to be missed and it’s going to cause a lot of innocent people to get arrested,” he said.

Washington state trooper James Arnold’s experience illustrates the conundrum. In May 2012, he arrested Danny Linh after pulling him over for speeding in Seattle, after which he smelled a “strong odor of marijuana” and observed “bloodshot/watery eyes,” according to his report. The trooper radioed for a drug-recognition expert, but none was available.

 

A judge in March threw out the officer’s field-sobriety tests after Mr. Linh’s lawyer argued that they weren’t reliable, and prosecutors dropped the case last month. Blood tests also showed Mr. Linh was below Washington’s new legal limit for THC, although that didn’t have a bearing on this case because the law went into effect after the arrest.

 

Ian Goodhew, deputy chief of staff for the King County prosecutor’s office, said the case may have turned out differently if a drug-recognition expert had been available, noting that there aren’t “enough to cover every DUI investigation.” Robert Calkins, spokesman for the Washington State Patrol, said troopers are well-equipped to deal with drugged drivers. He declined to make the trooper available for comment.

 

Mr. Linh, now 22 years old, said he wasn’t high and that the sobriety tests were “stupid because they were meant for alcohol.” His lawyer, Blair Russ, said the case shows that “we cannot hastily apply marijuana DUI laws,” because there is a “lack of sufficient research to make a decision about someone’s innocence or guilt, especially given the current tools available to law enforcement.”

 

Sobriety tests have been developed for drugged drivers, but just 6,837, or less than 1%, of the nation’s police officers are fully trained, according to the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which coordinates and manages the training program. Oregon State Patrol Sgt. Michael Iwai, who coordinates training for Oregon and works with the association, said officers using a 12-step evaluation specifically designed to identify drugged drivers-including a so-called walk and turn, balancing on one foot and an eye examination-are able to detect marijuana impairment.

 

In part because of the ambiguities in detecting pot-DUI situations, states like Colorado say they need an analog to the blood-alcohol test. “Without a test a lot turns on everything at the roadside and roadside tests related to marijuana impairment are not as clear-cut as the alcohol tests are,” said Tom Raynes, executive director at the Colorado District Attorneys Council.

 

The Colorado bill on pot DUI passed after six tries and heated debate over setting the appropriate THC limits. White House drug czar Gil Kerlikowske said that “when the science actually catches up with the law, they’re going to find that five nanograms is too high” a limit to be using. He is urging states to adopt laws that ban any trace of drugs, like a bill now being debated in the California Legislature.

 

Meanwhile, states are still sorting out punishments for drivers who are found to be high. In Washington, drivers arrested or convicted of DUI offenses, for alcohol or drugs, must install a device that prevents the car from starting if it detects alcohol on the driver’s breath. But the ignition-interlock device doesn’t detect marijuana or any other drug.

 

Stephen Graham, a Spokane criminal defense attorney, said he was “flabbergasted” when the Washington Department of Licensing wanted a client to install one after an arrest for driving under the influence of marijuana.

 

Brad Benfield, a spokesman for the Washington Department of Licensing, said the department must follow state rules. Part of the rationale for the law is that alcohol and marijuana are often present together in impaired drivers, said Shelly Baldwin of the Washington Traffic Safety Commission. In the future, she said, “we’re going to see technologies that will make testing for marijuana possible.”

 

 

——

Ireland: Irish Alcohol consumption drops by 20% in 12 years

 

Source: NewsTalk

Eoin Brennan

19 May 2013

 

The alcohol consumption in Ireland has fallen by 20% over 12 years, with the idea that all Irish people now drink to excess now believed to be far from the truth.

 

New figures, from the Revenue Commissioners, show a 4.4% drop in the volume of alcohol consumed in Ireland in the past year, with the consumption of both cider and spirits falling over 13%. Levels of teenagers drinking alcohol has also dropped.

 

Kathryn D’Arcy, director of The Alcohol Beverage Federation of Ireland, emphasised that Irish levels of alcohol consumption are no longer the aberration, in wider European terms, which they once were.

 

D’Arcy said: “There is a fall in alcohol consumption and we are fast approaching European norms.

 

“We have seen recent studies by the Department of Children and Youth Affairs and other studies showing that our teens are consuming less alcohol than they were a number of years ago, while other countries are seeing that they are having an increase in the problem of underage drinking.

 

“So I think we are doing some things right and I think we need to focus.”

 

 

——

Joe McClain: Beer drinkers paying an invisible tax

 

Source: LaCrosse Tribune

By Joe McClain

May 19th

 

American beer drinkers know that the same four simple ingredients have been the building blocks of great-tasting beers for generations: grains, hops, yeast and water.

 

But what most Americans don’t know is that there is another, more expensive ingredient in beer: taxes.

 

A recent Beer Institute analysis found that more than 40 percent of what consumers paid for beer went to the tax man. That makes beer one of the most taxed consumer products on the shelf.

 

We applaud the bipartisan legislation recently introduced into the House of Representatives by Rep. Ron Kind, D-La Crosse, in partnership with Rep. Tom Latham, a Republican from Iowa.

 

The Brewers Excise and Economic Relief Act of 2013, known as the BEER Act, would reduce the federal excise taxes that beer drinkers pay and serve to prevent others from trying to close the federal budget gap by hiking already-high taxes on everyday beer drinkers.

 

In talking with beer drinkers across the country, the Beer Institute found that most Americans don’t even know they are paying a federal beer levy called an “excise tax.” You can’t find it on a receipt. It’s invisible and regressive, meaning lower- and middle-income people feel the pinch of these hidden taxes more than those with higher incomes.

 

But the federal excise tax on beer is hitting beer drinkers – and the network of brewers, beer importers, raw materials suppliers, wholesalers and retailers – at twice the historic rate, due to an unprecedented revenue grab by Congress that raised the excise tax on beer, hardly an elitist luxury, on par with excise taxes on yachts, personal airplanes and luxury automobiles.

 

There is no reason why beer drinkers, brewers and the dozens of industries that support brewers and beer importers should have to pay more than their fair share of taxes. That is why the BEER Act serves such an important role, and deserves the support of the people of Wisconsin, as well as other members of Congress.

 

Today’s brewing industry represents an enormous contribution to the nation’s economy. The Beer Institute’s recent analysis of the industry found more than two million Americans are at work today in jobs because of beer – from farmers to factory workers, from brewers to bartenders.

 

All told, the economic contribution from making, importing and selling beer in America comes to more than $246.5 billion in annual activity, stretching from grain farms to bottle- and can-making factories, from warehouses to grocery stores, stadiums and restaurants.

 

In fact, for every one job at the brewery or beer importer, there are another 45 jobs in other industries: agriculture, marketing, engineering, manufacturing, warehousing, transportation, concessions and retail, just to name a few.

 

Here’s what the BEER Act would do: for the vast majority of beer consumed in the United States, it would roll back the federal excise tax from its historic peak of $18 for every 31-gallon barrel to $9 a barrel. For brewers of less than two million barrels annually, the rate would be slashed to $3.50 on the first 60,000 barrels; and for those brewers that produce less than 15,000 barrels, the federal excise tax would be eliminated entirely.

 

The BEER Act is fair, equitable and comprehensive, meaning it serves every part of the industry, from the start-up brewer to the thousands of workers in good-paying jobs at America’s major breweries.

 

We know this is a good policy, and that it can work to encourage expansion, reinvestment and further job creation. In 1977, with the support of major brewers, Congress cut the federal excise tax on brewers of less than 2 million barrels annually.

 

Reducing the federal excise tax was seen as a means of “creating a pathway to the marketplace” for new brewers – and it worked. At the time, there were 49 brewers in business. Today, we count more than 2,700 permitted brewers across the United States.

 

We have another opportunity to continue to foster a great industry, create more jobs here in this country, and protect taxpayers from having to pay even more in hidden taxes for what should be an affordable, everyday pleasure in a cold beer. That opportunity is the BEER Act, and it deserves your support.

 

 

——

Wells Fargo’s Weekly Economic & Financial Commentary

 

Source: Wells Fargo

May 17th

 

U.S.

.         Mixed economic data this week left economists uncertain on the direction of the economy in 2Q13.

.         Consumers have been resilient, with retail sales strengthening on an improved employment picture.

.         Inflation has been nonexistent, as gasoline prices have fallen and weak economic activity in China and Europe have driven commodity prices lower.

.         Limited inflation should allow the Fed to maintain its accommodative policies.

.         Industrial production and manufacturing are suffering from weaker than expected global growth.

.         Housing permits surged, suggesting strong construction activity in the months ahead, and builder confidence improved in May, as inventories dwindled.

 

International

.         The Eurozone continues to struggle, with GDP 3.3% below the 2008 peak.

.         France, Italy, and Spain all experienced declines while Germany expanded a modest 0.1%.

.         Consumer spending and confidence suffered from a weak labor market.

.         Economic indicators suggest business investment also shrank across the continent.

.         Limited monetary involvement and an unlikely probability of fiscal stimulus may keep the Eurozone in contraction for a bit longer.

 

 

——

Chinese investors snapping-up ‘one chateau per month’, say estate agents

 

Source: Decanter

by Adam Lechmere

Friday 17 May 2013

From the beginning of 2011, a leading Bordeaux real estate agent says, an average of one Bordeaux chateau per month has been sold to a Chinese investor.

 

Asian-owned properties in Bordeaux now number 40 to 50 – a figure that, given the size of the region, is a mere ‘blip on the radar’, estate agent Maxwell-Storrie-Baynes says.

 

From 1997, when Taiwanese native Peter Kwok bought Chateau Haut Brisson, there have been some 50 chateaux in the Bordeaux region sold to investors from China, Singapore, Taiwan and Japan.

 

The market for Bordeaux properties is so bullish that auctioneer Christie’s has seen the opportunity and is launching a vineyards service targetted at the Chinese, as part of Christie’s International Real Estate.

 

Maxwell-Storrie-Baynes, which acts as Christie’s Bordeaux affiliate, has compiled a table of purchases since the late 1990s and finds at least 40 chateaux are Chinese-owned.

 

It says the focus has primarily been on Chinese buyers but it is not always possible to discern exactly where buyers are from.

 

‘This is because business addresses or indeed the geographical sources of the purchase funds are not always the same as the owners’ [location].’

 

Some purchasers are building considerable portfolios of property. Cheng Qu, for example, owner of the huge oil-to-real estate Haichang Group, and the driving force behind the Dalian wine festival in northeast China, has just added Chateau L’Enclos in Sainte Foy la Grande, near Bergerac, to his holdings.

 

He is already owner of ten Bordeaux estates including Chateau Baby (also in Sainte Foy), Chateau Chenu-Lafitte and Chateau Branda.

 

The impetus behind buyers like Cheng – and there are many like him – is the desire to supply increasingly sophisticated Chinese consumers with wine. Within the next five to ten years, it is estimated, the middle class in China will number some 300m and constitute a market larger than the United States.

 

‘People who are buying Bordeaux chateaux are looking to service that market,’ Maxwell-Storrie-Baynes partner Michael Baynes told Decanter.com.’Typically, they want to control the supply chain.’

 

An early adopter of this policy – controlling supply from vineyard to end user – was Richard Shen Dongjun, owner of the 400-strong jewellery retail chain Tesiro, who bought the Medoc Cru Bourgeois Chateau Laulan Ducos in 2011.

 

A spokesman for Shen told Decanter.com at the time that the idea was to create a chain of stores under the name of the chateau, in cities with a rising wine-drinking culture, exploiting the existing Tesiro network. They would stop selling the wine in France.

 

There are compelling financial incentives behind such a move. With the cost of production ?2-3 per bottle, and the ability to mark up to ?30-50 per bottle, ‘it is a nice business prospect,’ Baynes says. ‘One of our clients recouped the price of the vineyard in one year.’

 

By and large, the Bordelais welcome this influx of investment, although resentment can bubble to the surface. One prominent owner, on selling her estate to a private French buyer said, ‘We wanted it to go to another family. We didn’t want it to go to a faceless insurance company or to a group of Chinese investors. We’re very happy that it is going to a family that we have known for a long time, and that we know will look after the estate.’

 

In Burgundy, the resentment is palpable: the purchase of Chateau Gevrey-Chambertin by Macau businessman and Burgundy lover Louis Ng last year caused a storm of protest. ‘It is a despoliation. Our heritage is going out of the window,’ Jean-Michel Guillon, president of the union of Gevrey-Chambertin wine producers said, just before the ultra-right Front National added its voice.

 

But Bordeaux is different, Barnes says, pointing out that there are 120,000ha of vines in Bordeaux and 28,000 in Burgundy, of which only 5,000 are of real interest.

 

‘There’s a totally different reaction in Bordeaux,’ Baynes says. ‘We’re delighted to have the Chinese here. They couldn’t have come at a better time. This region has a long history of foreign investment, from the Irish to the Belgians, the English, Australian magnates, Americans, Brazilians, Saudi princes. It’s nothing new.’

 

Baynes also notes that in a region of 8,000 chateaux, Chinese owners represent only 0.5% of ownership. ‘In the grand scheme of things they are a blip on the radar.’

 

 

——

Bordeaux 2012: Montrose, Clinet, Domaine de Chevalier release

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Friday 17 May 2013

 

New price releases are being met by an increasingly small pool of buyers in the Bordeaux 2012 campaign.

 

Among the estates to release yesterday were Chateau Montrose, matching Pichon Comtesse with a 20% price decrease on 2011 to ?57.60 ex-Bordeaux (still above its ?42 ex-Bordeaux in 2008 but significantly down from its ?132 high in 2010). Chateau Tronquoy Lalande, from the same stable, posted a 6.25% drop to ?18 ex-Bordeaux.

 

The widely-praised Chateau Clinet in Pomerol dropped 11.9% to ?44 (this was at ?33 in 2008), and Chateau Carbonnieux brought both its red and white wines down by around 3% to ?15.5 (red) and ?16.5 (white).

 

Also in Pessac Léognan, Domaine de Chevalier, decided to keep both its red and white unchanged from the 2011 vintage, so ?30 ex-Bordeaux for the red, and ?58 for the white (in 2008 you’d have paid ?23.50 for the red, and ?45 for the white).

 

Château Guiraud in Sauternes also kept its 2011 price at ?30 ex-Bordeaux.

 

As the campaign begins to wind down, it now looks as if even drops of 20% are unlikely to attract the attention of buyers.

 

Max Lalondrelle at Berry Bros told Decanter.com the problem was that people simply did not think they were getting a good deal any more.

 

‘En Primeur should be very simple – customers give chateaux cash in advance, and for that they get a deal. They need to be able to look back and think buying in advance was a good thing. That’s not happening any more.’

 

BBR sold 220 bottles of Montrose yesterday, Lalondrelle said, compared to around 2,000 last year and around 5,500 bottles of the 2010.

 

‘There are five other vintages of Montrose available in the market in the UK for a cheaper price, so customers know they can pick up the 2012 once they have tasted it for themselves.’

 

 

——

Golden Equity Investments acquires Goosecross Cellars in California

 

Source: DBR

17 May 2013

 

Golden Equity Investments (GEI), a Colorado-based private equity firm that provides equity capital to privately-held middle market companies, has acquired boutique winery Goosecross Cellars of California for an undisclosed amount.

 

The purchase, which is the first for GEI in wine industry, includes 11-acre estate winery and vineyard property, tasting room and a Tudor-style estate home.

 

Came to existence in 1985, Goosecross uses grapes from on its nine acre vineyard and grapes purchased from local growers to produce luxury-tier Napa Valley wines.

 

The winery’s vineyard is planted with Bordeaux varietals, including Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Cabernet Franc and Petit Verdot.

 

GEI manager Christi Coors Ficeli said the company was attracted by Goosecross’ location, vineyard and winery.

 

“Its direct-to-consumer success and reputation for premium quality wine varietals positions us for ongoing success,” Ficeli added.

 

“Our focus will be to continue the tradition of producing high-quality wines, as well as growing the brand to gain more national recognition. We will continue to promote the current wines and look to grow the portfolio.

 

“I look forward to meeting the winery’s loyal customers and also intend to invest in the tasting room, the winemaking facility, and the estate to enhance the experience for our patrons.”

 

 

——

Haute stuff

 

Source: FT

By Jancis Robinson

May 17th

 

Wine is one of the most sensitive measures of climate change. A rise in temperature during the growing season can easily result – indeed has resulted – in riper grapes and fuller-bodied wines. Drought in areas such as much of Europe, where irrigation is banned, can leave grapes shrivelled and more like raisins, the resulting wine extremely dry and chewy with a distinct shortage of juice. The exceptional heatwave in 2003 provided European wine growers with a wake-up call but, in many regions, 2005 and 2009 were not so dissimilar.

 

Higher temperatures and lower rainfall are having a particularly profound effect on the wine industry of Australia, where the economics of wine production in the vast irrigated inland wine regions that once churned out inexpensive wine labelled South-Eastern Australia make less sense now that water rights cost so much. The total area of Australia under vine has shrunk, from 172,676 hectares in 2008 to 148,509 last year.

 

But climate change can help some wine growers. The quality of wine produced in Canada, England and Germany has improved immeasurably over the past decade. As acid levels plummet to sometimes dangerously low levels in Champagne (tart wine is a prerequisite for fine fizz), in England and Wales they have fallen to just about acceptable levels (although last year was a challenge for many European growers, especially those as far north as the British Isles).

 

Even within established fine wine regions, the rise in temperatures is changing reality and, more slowly, reputations. In Bordeaux, for example, in years as warm as 2009, the supposedly lean, mean Médoc appellations Listrac and Moulis can produce some attractive, almost fleshy wines. And this is with a palette of varieties as sturdy as Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot.

 

The Pinot Noir of Burgundy’s heartland, the Côte d’Or, is even more sensitive, so it is hardly surprising that things have been changing in the rarefied world of red burgundy production. The best (for which read oldest) vines in the most hallowed vineyards (Grand Cru and the best Premiers Crus) have deep enough roots and small enough crops to ensure that in even the driest, hottest of years they can yield top-quality grapes. But some other Pinot vines on the Côte d’Or have suffered in recent hot vintages, and there are few drinks less appetising than soupy Pinot.

 

For decades the pretty wooded hills west of the famous limestone escarpment that is the Côte d’Or were regarded as a fine source of blackcurrants for the cassis needed in a kir – but beyond the pale by fine wine lovers. They were known as the Arrières Côtes until the locals pushed through a smarter-sounding name, the Hautes Côtes, divided into the Hautes Côtes de Nuits in the north, behind the Côte de Nuits, and the Hautes Côtes de Beaune, to the west of the wine town of Beaune.

 

Until recently most of the wine grown in the Hautes Côtes was pretty thin stuff but this is changing – partly because summers are getting warmer, and partly because of people like Olivier Jouan, a vigneron in the village of Arcenant who seems even more determined to make great wine than his counterparts downhill on the Côte d’Or.

 

Arcenant is typical of the villages of the Hautes Côtes. Unlike the prosperous villages of the Côte d’Or, where every ancient stone seems to have been polished and regrouted, Arcenant sprawls in an undisciplined fashion with something even approaching a housing estate above the forbidding church. I’d been warned by the British importer Roy Richards that there was no mobile phone signal in Arcenant and it took me a good 15 minutes and inquiries at several front doors before I found the workmanlike courtyard of Olivier Jouan, who has been making wine here since 1999. The son of a director of Smurfit Kappa packaging, he chose to establish himself in the keenly priced Hautes Côtes on taking over from other family members three hectares of vineyard in the Côte de Nuits, including some excellent vines in La Riotte in Morey-St-Denis planted in 1925. “There is still a Jouan Henri in Morey-St-Denis,” he told me.

 

He took the decision to vinify all his wines in Arcenant and to add 5.5 hectares of rented Hautes Côtes vineyard. He admits that at this altitude his cellar is so cold that it can be difficult to complete the second, softening malolactic fermentations. They were still proceeding at a painfully stately pace on his 2011s when I visited in November last year. He exports eight in every 10 bottles he fills, to the likes of Raeburn in Edinburgh, Jeff Welburn in Los Angeles and various Asian importers, but admits that it is difficult being so far off the established routes for the container lorries that are so familiar in the backstreets of Gevrey-Chambertin and Vosne-Romanée.

 

But he is convinced that the future is rosy. “I really think that some of our Hautes Côtes wines can be confused with Côte d’Or wines blind.” He is encouraged by the fact that many of the vines that were planted here in the 1960s when blackcurrants and raspberries were challenged by cheaper imports from Poland are now fully mature. Set against this is what he sees as a very different mentality in the Hautes Côtes where most vignerons are mixed farmers and, typically, deliver their grapes to the local co-op.

 

He believes that eventually there will be individual village appellations for the likes of Arcenant, Echevronne and Bevy rather than the much less geographically precise Hautes Côtes appellations. He has just one employee on his payroll and does most of the work himself, although he hopes his wife will join him.

 

He is helped by the fact that he picks relatively late so that he can sometimes hire pickers who have already done the vintage elsewhere. To judge from the wines listed, I too am optimistic about the Hautes Côtes, perhaps even more for the lively whites than the reds.

 

 

——

Court told of £4.5m wine fraud

 

Source: the drinks business

by Andy Young

17th May, 2013

 

A court has heard how a group of fraudsters conned hundreds of people out of £4.5 million through bogus wine investments.

 

Southwark Crown CourtSouthwark Crown Court heard that Daniel Snelling, 38, his sister Dina Snelling, 35, and their cousin, Rebecca McDonald, 42, carried out two frauds over the space of three years, often targeting elderly people’s life savings.

 

The trio initially set up Nouveau World Wines, which promised to invest in the best Australian wines. Investors would pay on average thousands of pounds each for wine to be bought and sold, but much of the wine was never purchased. When Nouveau investors found out the company was folded, but the jury was told that a second company, Finbow Wines, was then set up.

 

Prosecutor Julian Christopher QC told the court that Nouveau investors paid an average of £5,000 for 72 bottles of the finest Australian wines. These were due to be stored in Australia for several years to gain in value.

 

Christopher added that Nouveau did buy wine, but while the investments should have bought 39,000 bottles, the company only ever had a maximum of 11,349 bottles.

 

He told the court: “The suggestion was that in two or three years’ time they would sell that wine at a huge profit and they (Nouveau) would make their money by taking 10% of the profit.

 

“Lots of people were attracted by that. Often elderly people investing their savings. After they invested once, they were being targeted again and again.”

 

The court was told that when suspicious investors started asking questions, Nouveau ceased trading and Finbow was set up.

 

Sales staff working for Nouveau were told overnight that they were now working for Finbow, the court heard.

 

Mr Christopher told the court the defendants were in the process of setting up a third firm, M2M, specialising in “fine old world wines” when they were arrested in March 2010.

 

Mr Christopher added: “Whether Nouveau was always intended as a front from the outset or whether, as time went on, the temptation and opportunity became too much to resist is a question you may want to consider.”

 

Daniel Snelling’s girlfriend, Kelly Humphreys was the companies’ training director and she is also due to stand trial over her alleged involvement at a later date. All four currently on trial deny all the charges against them. The trial, which continues, is due to last 10 weeks.

 

 

——

CAROLINE MAY SELECTED TO SERVE AS ASSISTANT CHIEF COUNSEL (FIELD OPERATIONS)

 

Source: TTB

May 17th

 

Caroline May joined TTB Office of Chief Counsel as an attorney-advisor in June 2008, after spending several years doing part time legal work for a law firm in Cincinnati. She currently serves as the Senior Counsel, Field Operations. Among her many duties she has been the primary legal advisor to the criminal enforcement program since October of 2010. During her tenure, Ms. May has gained a wide range of experience in the regulation and enforcement of the laws and regulations under TTB’s jurisdiction.

 

From 1997 to 1999, Ms. May was a trial attorney with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Tax Division. While at DOJ, she represented the United States in federal district and bankruptcy courts in tax refund and collection matters, summons enforcement matters, Freedom of Information and Privacy Act cases, and matters involving the alleged unlawful disclosure of tax return information under 26 U.S.C. § 6103. Before joining DOJ, Ms. May spent three years as a litigation associate at the Washington, D.C. law firm of Patton Boggs, L.L.P.

 

Ms. May holds a B.A., magna cum laude, from the University of Louisville and a J.D. from the University of Virginia. She is a member of the Commonwealth of Virginia Bar, the District of Columbia Bar and the Commonwealth of Kentucky Bar.

 

 

——

UK retailer Sainsbury’s to double sales of low-alcohol wines

 

Source: DBR

17 May 2013

 

Sainsbury’s, a UK-based firm with chain of supermarkets, plans to double the sales of low-alcohol wines in the country by 2020 to meet the growing demand and to follow government’s Responsibility Deal.

 

According to Sainsbury’s beers, wines and spirits head Andy Phelps, the firm aims to increase the current range of low-alcohol wines and also expand the number of its single-serve wines to around 25.

 

The move is to help consumers reduce their alcohol intake levels and make them try new wines, reported Harpers.

 

Currently, the retail chain is selling only its own-label House wines in single-serve packs of 175ml bottles.

 

Phelps was quoted by the website as saying that the company has reported increase in sales of lower-alcohol wines by 14% year on year and attributed it to customers’ growing choice of drinking lower-alcohol wines.

 

The company, therefore, plans to offer new grape varieties such as Gavi and Prosecco in single-serve bottles.

 

These single-serve wine bottles will be sold along with Sainsbury’s bag-in-box range.

 

 

——

Indiana: Overhaul of alcohol laws a must

 

Source: Jounal Gazette

May 19th

 

The latest battle over laws governing Indiana alcohol sales heats ups, coincidentally, just as federal authorities push for a lower threshold for drunken driving. State lawmakers don’t appear to be interested in reducing the legal blood-alcohol level for driving, but they must give a comprehensive review to Indiana’s mishmash of alcohol laws. An overhaul is sorely needed.

 

Laws governing the sale of alcohol that lawmakers have cobbled together over the years have created an uneven field of competition. The debate is a never-ending issue at the Statehouse, consuming an absurd amount of legislators’ time and attention and fueled by about $1 million a year in lobbying dollars.

 

The Indiana Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court over laws restricting convenience shops, grocery stores and pharmacies from selling cold beer. The statewide trade group contends the lawsuit is about fairness.

 

The complaint says Indiana’s alcohol statutes and regulations “create an irrational and discriminatory regulatory regime.” They suggest the state should not be in the business of picking winners and losers in the alcohol market. The convenience store lobbyists are correct.

 

But so is the Indiana Association of Beverage Retailers, the trade group representing liquor stores. It argues that regulations placed on liquor stores that don’t apply to grocery or convenience stores also create an unfair market advantage.

 

Liquor stores are limited to selling only alcohol or alcohol-related products. Liquor store clerks must be at least 21, undergo at least two hours of state certified training, and have a license that costs $45 every three years.

 

“I think there is a lot of money involved in the liquor lobby, and there are a lot of influential people involved,” said Julia Vaughn, director of Common Cause Indiana. “The politics creates gridlock. It’s a good example of what can happen when there is so much money and influence involved. So much of making legislation is not about policy; it’s about how you feel about the person trying to bend your ear on a certain issue. I think it serves to create this crazy quilt of laws we have.”

 

Vaughn reasonably suggests that stricter limits on lobbyists’ wining, dining and gift-giving to lawmakers, as well as greater disclosure, might remove some of the politics from the process.

 

With tighter limits in place, a sound study of Indiana’s current laws is more likely to produce the recommendations needed for a revision yielding less complexity, more fairness and sensible regulation of alcoholic beverages.

 

 

——

Texas: House approves beer bills on second reading

 

Source: Chron

Friday, May 17, 2013

 

The Texas House of Representatives just voted to approve a 5-pack of bills that would make significant changes in the way beer is sold across the state.

 

There was audible applause from the gallery, where Scott Metzger, Rick Donley and other interested parties were watching the proceedings.

 

If approved on third reading – either later today or Monday – and signed into law by Gov. Rick Perry, Texans could soon buy and drink a beer at their local brewery and purchase brewpub beers at the store.

 

The package of bills is considered the most significant legislation affecting the beer industry since 1993, when the state authorized brewpubs that could make and sell their own beer on site.

 

Once formally passed, the bills go to Gov. Rick Perry for his signature or veto. Rick Donley, president of the Beer Alliance of Texas, the state wholesalers group that has supported the bills throughout the session, has said representatives of the governor’s office have attended key meetings during the year-long process of crafting and making compromises on the bills.

 

Saint Arnold owner Brock Wagner said he was “cautiously optimistic” ahead of Friday’s scheduled vote.

 

Highlights of the legislation:

 

Saint Arnold and other breweries that package their beer for off-site sales would be allowed to sell a limited amount of their beer directly to customers for consumption on site. This bill would not allow people to purchase beer to take home, either in packaged form or in growlers.

 

Brewpubs would be allowed to sell some of their beer to other bars, stores and other retail outlets through wholesalers. They also would be allowed to self-distribute a portion of their production. For Houstonians, this means, for example, that fans of San Antonio’s Freetail Brewing would be able to purchase some of its beers at their local liquor stores or pubs that carry them.

 

Small brewers would have new limits on how much beer they could distribute on their own.

 

Some breweries with higher production would be allowed to self-distribute up to this limit.

 

Breweries would be forbidden from receiving cash payment from wholesalers for exclusive distribution rights, although the wholesalers would be allowed to makes some investments in the breweries they represent. This controversial bill was initially blasted by brewers and business groups, but it was included as part of a compromise to secure the support of the Wholesale Beer Distributors of Texas.

 

 

——

Texas Voters March to Polls to Modernize Liquor Laws

 

Voters pass 18 out of 22 alcohol wet-dry elections on Saturday

 

Source: DISCUS

May 17th

 

The trend of Texas communities voting to allow local alcohol sales picked up steam Saturday after 18 out of 22 local alcohol elections passed, according to the Distilled Spirits Council, which attributed the wins to consumer interest in modern convenience and increased revenue without raising taxes.

 

“Consumer attitudes have come a long way since Prohibition,” said Dale Szyndrowksi, Council Vice President, noting that states around the country have modernized 1930s-era alcohol laws to keep pace with today’s economy.  “These elections reflect modern demographics, and we expect the trend will continue as voters and policymakers seek convenience and revenue, respectively.”

 

Szyndrowksi pointed to the Plano election as the most significant victory (65%-35%), noting that Plano is a populous suburb north of Dallas in one of America’s fastest-growing counties.

 

The Texas Trend

According to the Distilled Spirits Council, 18 out of 22 localities voted on Saturday to allow alcohol sales – going from “dry” areas to “wet” areas (beer, wine and/or spirits; on- and/or off-premise).  After 26 out of 28 successful alcohol elections in November 2012, and 15 out of 15 in May 2012, the tally of victorious wet-dry elections in the last year (May-May) comes to 59 out of 65, for a 91% success rate.  Since 2004 Texans have taken to polling stations to pass 509 out of 641 alcohol elections, for a 79% success rate. Click here to see Saturday’s election results.

 

“Prohibition-era laws don’t make sense in today’s economy, and that’s why voters across Texas are striking them down for good,” Szyndrowksi said.

 

Momentum for Sunday Alcohol Sales

Szyndrowksi also noted that wet-dry elections aren’t the only alcohol issue voters care about and pointed to the End Texas Blue Laws social media campaign which has garnered over 20,000 Facebook fans in 2013.  The campaign’s primary goal this year is to pass House Bill 421 – legislation allowing package stores the opportunity to open on Sundays, the second busiest shopping day of the week.  According to Szyndrowksi, 38 states allow Sunday liquor sales, including 16 since 2002.

 

 

——

New York: New York State should lower DWI threshold to a blood alcohol level of .05% from .08%

 

Source: NEW YORK DAILY NEWS

Sunday, May 19, 2013

 

The National Transportation Safety Board is calling on states to cut the legal standard for drunken driving almost in half as a certain way to save lives. We’ll drink to that – with a designated driver.

 

Gov. Cuomo and the Legislature could markedly improve highway safety by reducing the threshold for a criminal charge of driving while intoxicated to a blood alcohol level of .05% from .08%.

 

The change should be the next important step in the transformation of drinking and driving from a common practice to a cultural taboo.

 

After decades of progress in reducing drunken driving deaths, the toll has plateaued. Roughly 10,000 Americans die annually in alcohol-related crashes. New York State counts around 360 deaths every year in accidents where a driver was either intoxicated (.08%) or impaired (.06%).

 

Government statistics show that a person with a .08% blood alcohol level has a 169% greater chance of crashing a car than a sober driver. By comparison, at .05%, drivers are only 38% more likely to crack up a car.

 

That enormous difference is reflected in the death tally. In 2011, New York had 315 DWI-related fatalities and just 67 deaths involving drivers who had consumed only enough alcohol to be categorized as impaired.

 

In Australia, the state of Queensland saw the number of fatal crashes decline 18% after imposing the lower limit the NTSB is suggesting. And the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety estimates that the U.S. would have experienced 6,794 fewer deaths in 2011 if all drivers had stayed below the .08% line.

 

To exceed .05%, a 180-pound man would have to drink on average three glasses of wine or beer in 90 minutes. A 130-pound woman could have two drinks and still be legal, if not safe.

 

Most industrialized nations already use the .05% benchmark. Joining the rest of world in saving lives is something New Yorkers can toast.

 

 

——

Utah: Drinking drivers

 

Lower threshold not best deterrent

 

Source: Salt Lake Tribune

May 18 2013

 

Despite an avowed aversion to anything coming from the federal government, Utah legislators seemed eager this past week to consider adopting the National Transportation Safety Board’s recommendation that states reduce their drunk-driving blood-alcohol thresholds.

 

Sen. John Valentine, R-Orem, who is the Utah Legislature’s leader in setting state liquor policy, said he and his colleagues will closely consider the NTSB’s support for prohibiting driving with a blood-alcohol concentration above 0.05 – more than a third lower than the current standard of 0.08.

 

However, although any policy that further demonizes alcohol consumption is likely to find favor among Utah’s conservative, mostly Mormon, legislators, it would be a mistake for them to believe that simply putting more drivers into the illegal category would reduce the carnage on highways caused by drunken driving.

 

Better enforcement of existing drunk driving laws and stiffer penalties for first-time offenders would have a greater deterrent effect. All too often the trouble is with lenient sentences and crowded jails, not too few DUI arrests.

 

Valentine pointed to European nations that have seen fatalities decline after prohibiting driving with a blood-alcohol concentration above 0.05 – more than a third lower than the U.S. standard of 0.08. But many European nations also enforce stringent penalties, including jail time and confiscation of the drinker’s car, even on the first offense. Europeans are more serious about stopping anyone who has consumed any alcohol from driving, and that has created a culture that does not tolerate such behavior.

 

In its announcement of the new recommendation, the NTSB said people with a blood-alcohol level of 0.05 percent are 38 percent more likely to be involved in a crash than those who have not been drinking. People with a blood-alcohol level of at least 0.08 percent are 169 percent more likely.

 

All 50 states adopted the current 0.08 percent level faced with a 2000 law that withheld highway construction money from states that did not.

 

Utah legislators should adopt a lower standard, but not based only on their inherent distrust of alcohol consumption. Their policy to keep alcohol out of sight at restaurants – not where underage or heavy drinkers get their booze – demonstrates this illogical thinking.

 

A more responsible approach would focus on habitual drunk drivers, those who pose the real danger. Penalties should be tougher for a first offense, swift and unrelenting for a second.

 

 

——

Oklahoma: Oklahoma grocery store wine proposal being renewed

 

Source: AP

By TIM TALLEY

May 19th

 

Supporters of a plan to permit some grocery stores in Oklahoma’s most populous counties to sell wine plan to launch a new petition drive to put the proposal to a statewide vote.

 

The plan is promoted by the advocacy group Oklahomans for Modern Laws. The group’s attorney, former Secretary of State Glenn Coffee, says it plans to resubmit the proposal to voters this summer about a year after it was withdrawn following a Supreme Court challenge.

 

Supporters were forced to withdraw the petition after legal proceedings against the proposed constitutional amendment delayed the start of the 90-day period in which supporters needed to obtain 155,216 signatures to place the issue on the Nov. 6 general election ballot.

 

Supporters are now hoping for a vote in the November 2014 general election.

 

 

——

Canada: Cheers! Ontario Liquor-Store Strike Averted

 

Source: WSJ

By Karen Johnson

May 17th

 

An Ontario liquor-store strike was averted late Thursday,  just in time for the kick off of the Victoria Day long weekend.

 

The Liquor Control Board of Ontario reached a tentative agreement with its nearly 7,000 unionized workers, ending worry among restaurateurs and consumers – at least for now – about service disruptions at the province’s 630 LCBO stores and warehouses.

 

The tentative agreement, reached just ahead of the midnight strike deadline, still needs to be ratified by the union’s members, and approved by the LCBO board and the provincial government. Terms of the deal weren’t disclosed.

 

The LCBO is just about the only place to buy liquor in the province. It’s also by far the biggest seller of wine, though wine – and beer – can be purchased elsewhere.

 

Warren (Smokey) Thomas, president of the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, which represents liquor board employees across the province, said in a statement that the negotiations were “very tough.”

 

“Did we get everything we were asking for? No. Did the LCBO get everything they were demanding of our members? No,” he said. The union has been pushing for better wages and better hours, while the deeply indebted provincial government has been looking to rein in spending.

 

Bob Peter, LCBO president and chief executive, said late Thursday in a statement that the agreement is “fair to employees” and “in the best interest of taxpayers.”

 

Contract talks have been going on since February, but picked up steam in the lead-up to Thursday night’s strike deadline – as did sales at the retailer’s stores.

 

LCBO spokeswoman Heather MacGregor said Thursday that store sales in recent days were “brisk,” as people heeded warnings to stock up in advance of the potential walkout. The stores saw 28 million Canadian dollars ($27.5 million) in combined sales Wednesday, compared with C$17 million on a comparable day last year.

 

That’s still well short of the LCBO’s historic one-day sales record, when the stores had a whopping C$56 million in sales. That was in June 2009 – just ahead of previous strike deadline from the LCBO’s union.

Our Memorial Day Newsletter/Sale

 http://conta.cc/11OMvrf

Our Website

http://www.franklinliquors.com

Our Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/franklinliquorsMA

Our Twitter

http://www.twitter.com

 

 

Liquor Industry News 5-15-13

May 15, 2013

 

www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Wednesday May 15th 2013

Biodynamic FLOWER Day!

Great To Taste OR Drink Wine

 

U.S. Board Urges 0.05 Drunk-Driving Threshold

 

Source: Associated Press

May 14th

 

Federal accident investigators recommended Tuesday that states cut their threshold for drunken driving by nearly half, matching a standard that has substantially reduced highway deaths in other countries.

 

The National Transportation Safety Board said states should shrink the standard from the current .08 blood-alcohol content to .05 as part of a series of recommendations aimed at reducing alcohol-related highway deaths.

 

More than 100 countries have adopted the .05 alcohol-content standard or lower, according to a report by the board’s staff. In Europe, the share of traffic deaths attributable to drunken driving was reduced by more than half within 10 years after the standard was dropped.

 

A woman weighing less than 120 pounds can reach .05 after just one drink, studies show. A man weighing as much as 160 pounds reaches .05 after two drinks.

 

New approaches are needed to combat drunken driving, which claims the lives of more than a third of the 30,000 people killed each year on U.S highways-a level that has remained stubbornly consistent for the past decade and a half, the board said.

 

“Our goal is to get to zero deaths because each alcohol-impaired death is preventable,” NTSB Chairman Deborah Hersman said. “Alcohol-impaired deaths are not accidents, they are crimes. They can and should be prevented. The tools exist. What is needed is the will.”

 

But the recommendation to lowering the alcohol content threshold to .05 is likely to meet strong resistance from states, said Jonathan Adkins, an official with the Governors Highway Safety Association, which represents state highway-safety offices.

 

“It was very difficult to get .08 in most states, so lowering it again won’t be popular,” Mr. Adkins said. “The focus in the states is on high [blood-alcohol-content] offenders as well as repeat offenders. We expect industry will also be very vocal about keeping the limit at .08.”

 

The lower alcohol-content threshold was one of nearly 20 recommendations aimed at reducing drunken driving made by the board, including that states adopt measures to ensure more widespread use of use of ignition devices. Those require a driver to breathe into a tube, much like the breathalyzers police ask suspected drunken drivers to use.

 

The board has previously recommended states to require that all convicted drunken drivers install the interlock devices in their vehicles as a condition to resume driving. Currently, 17 states and two California counties require that all convicted drivers use the devices.

 

However, only about a quarter of drivers ordered to use the devices actually end up doing so, the NTSB said. Drivers use a variety of ways to evade using the devices, including claiming they won’t drive at all or don’t own a vehicle and therefore don’t need the devices, staff said.

 

The board recommended that the National Highway Safety Administration, which makes safety grants to states, develop a program to encourage states to ensure all convicted drivers actually use the devices. The board also recommended that all suspected drunken drivers whose licenses are confiscated by police be required to install interlocks as a condition of getting their licenses reinstated even though they haven’t yet been convicted of a crime.

 

Courts usually require drivers to pay for the devices, which cost about $50 to $100 to buy plus a $50 monthly fee to operate, staff said.

 

Studies show more than four million people a year in the U.S. drive while intoxicated, but about half of the intoxicated drivers stopped by police escape detection, the NTSB report said.

 

Today, drunken driving claims about 10,000 lives a year, down from more than 18,000 in 1982. At that time, alcohol-related fatalities accounted for about 40% of highway deaths.

 

 

——

ABI Responds to NTSB’s Push for 0.05

 

Source: ABI

May 14, 2013

 

Earlier today, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) voted to recommend that all states lower their legal limits for drunk driving from 0.08 to 0.05 percent. The NTSB is pushing the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to use funding incentives to encourage states to lower their BAC limits and adopt interlock mandates for low-BAC, first-time offenders.

 

ABI immediately responded to the NTSB’s decision with the press release below. We’ve also already been quoted in The New York Times, USA Today, CNN, Bloomberg Businessweek, and ABC News.

 

A lower 0.05 legal limit is just the latest threat to on-premise alcohol consumption and responsible social drinking. For more information on the activist campaign to lower the legal limit, contact ABI at 202-463-7110.

 

Restaurant Association Criticizes NTSB Push for Lower Legal Blood Alcohol Limit  

 

American Beverage Institute Opposes Recommendation to Move to 0.05% BAC Per Se Legal Limit

 

Today the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) officially recommended that policymakers lower the legal threshold for drunk driving from 0.08 percent blood alcohol concentration (BAC) to 0.05 percent as part of its “Safety Report on Eliminating Impaired Driving.” The American Beverage Institute (ABI), a restaurant trade association with over 8,000 members, criticized the recommendation for ignoring the science on impairment and targeting moderate drinkers instead of dangerous drunk drivers.

 

The average woman reaches 0.05 percent BAC after the consumption of just one drink. Meanwhile, over 70 percent of drunk driving fatalities are caused by drivers with BACs of 0.15 or higher (consumption of 6-7 drinks), and the average BAC of a drunk driver involved in a fatal crash is 0.16 percent-twice the current legal limit.

 

“This recommendation is ludicrous. Moving from 0.08 to 0.05 would criminalize perfectly responsible behavior,” said Sarah Longwell, Managing Director of ABI. “Further restricting the moderate consumption of alcohol by responsible adults prior to driving does nothing to stop hardcore drunk drivers from getting behind the wheel. It would simply divert valuable public resources that should be used to pursue the most dangerous offenders and instead use them to target drivers engaging in perfectly safe behavior.”

 

Out of the over 32,000 U.S. traffic fatalities in 2011 (the most recent year for data), less than one percent were caused by drivers between 0.05 and 0.08 percent BAC. Lowering the legal limit is unlikely to lower the fatality rate further: A study of South Australia after the state lowered its BAC limit from 0.08 to 0.05 found that the lower limit did not significantly affect the number of alcohol related fatalities. A study of Denmark’s 0.05 law did not find a decrease in alcohol-related crashes in the first year after the law was adopted, but did find an increase in the number of drivers who said they will not consume any alcohol to avoid violating the law.

 

Longwell continued: “This is the latest attempt by traffic safety activist groups to expand the definition of ‘drunk’. A little over a decade ago, we lowered our legal limit from 0.1 percent after groups like Mothers Against Drunk Driving assured the country that, based on all the science, 0.08 BAC was absolutely, unequivocally where the legal threshold should be set for drunk driving. Has the science changed? Or have anti-alcohol activists simply set their sights on a new goal?”

 

 

——

Statement Of John D. Bodnovich Executive Director, American Beverage Licensees (ABL) On NTSB’s recommendation to pursue a national .05 BAC per se limit.

 

Source: ABL

May 14, 2013

 

“Today’s recommendation by the National Transportation Safety Board to arbitrarily redefine drunk driving does not address the problem at its core and would dilute current efforts to stop repeat offenders and those who drive with high BAC.  If implemented, the recommendation would effectively criminalize the activities of law-abiding social drinkers who, by wide majority, are responsible consumers.  This recommendation also goes way beyond what public health groups – including Mothers Against Drunk Driving – call for to fight drunk driving.  

 

Drunk driving is unacceptable.  Despite the great strides we’ve made to change our culture when it comes drunk driving, we all agree that more work needs to be done.  We will continue to work with policymakers, regulators and public officials to support effective drunk driving policies while opposing those that undermine the important efforts already being made in this fight.”

 

 

——

Chinese austerity hits Diageo’s sales

 

Source: FT

By Louise Lucas in London

May 14th

 

Sales of Diageo’s baijiu, a clear grain spirit popular in China, slumped 40 per cent in the first quarter of this year as the world’s biggest distiller became the latest casualty of China’s crackdown on conspicuous consumption.

 

The rapid deterioration in fortunes at Shui Jing Fang, one of the first Chinese household names to be taken over by a foreign company, comes as other makers of high priced spirits have suffered falling sales amid the chill winds of austerity with socialist characteristics. It is a turnround for the drinks industry which, like other purveyors of status symbols, had become accustomed to runaway growth in China comfortably offsetting European weakness.

 

Pernod Ricard, the world’s second-biggest distiller after UK-listed Diageo, is set to report an annual decline in Scotch whisky sales in China, following years of surging growth. This came after flat sales over the Chinese New Year period, when it sold more Cognac but saw Scotch sales fall by double-digits in percentage terms year-on-year.

 

Diageo has so far shrugged off concerns about the crackdown saying it is having little effect on gifting, which makes up 10 to 15 per cent of Scotch and Cognac sales in the country.

 

Kweichow Moutai, China’s largest baijiu maker, reported a halving in year-on-year profit growth in the first quarter. Baijiu, like a host of other food and drinks in China, has also been caught up in food safety concerns.

 

Shui Jing Fang, which Diageo acquired last year after years of protracted and complex negotiations, saw both sales and earnings before interest and tax fall by 40 per cent in the first quarter of the calendar year, Diageo said on an investor call on Tuesday. That followed net sales growth of 10 per cent and operating profit growth of 12 per cent in the previous full year.

 

Although Shui Jing Fang is just a drop of Diageo’s sales at around 1 per cent, baijiu dwarfs sales of international spirits in China and is seen as an attractive sector for multinationals to increase their grip on.

 

Ian Shackleton, analyst at Nomura, said although Diageo expected the baijiu sector to remain soft this year, it anticipated double-digit growth longer term. With the category “going through a rough ride”, it would appear that the company would consider opportunities to add to its position in the Chinese baijiu market, he said.

 

 

——

Quick Note – Diageo (DGE LN, Buy) – Asian investor call

 

Source: Nomura

May 14, 2013

 

European Beverages

Stock Rating: Buy

Target Price: 2400p

DGE.L (2037p)

Ian Shackleton – NIplc

 

Although 3Q had suggested some normalisation of growth in emerging markets, we still have confidence in Diageo meeting consensus EPS estimates, with better price/mix, especially in the core US market, helping margins. We believe that the announcement earlier this month of COO Menezes taking over as CEO at the end of June is likely to lead to more focus on the emerging market businesses, as well as a firm commitment to strong execution in-market. Further M&A, here again most likely in emerging markets, could also provide a catalyst for the shares. Valuation – 2014E PER of 17.0x vs spirits average of 18.2x.

 

Asia – some near-term challenges, but strategy on track

Today, the company hosted one of its regular brunch-time calls on the Asia Pacific division. Asia accounts for c.10% of F13 group EBIT and includes large positions in mature countries such as Australia and South Korea, as well as exposure to emerging Asia. Despite a moderation in top-line run rate in the Asia Pac division in F13 (est organic revenue growth +6% vs F12 +8%, F11 +11%), the Asian strategy and longer-term growth drivers are intact, with focus on increasing share of Scotch and driving premiumisation across the brand range.

 

F14 top line to accelerate

We see a pickup in the top-line run-rate in AsiaPac in F14 to +8% vs F13 +6% as key F13 headwinds show some moderation. In Korea, we would expect a slowdown in the rate of decline in F14 (H1 F13 revenues -14%); in Global Travel Asia the company sees a “rebound” in cal H2 2013 (H1 F14) following the current period of destocking; and for Shui Jing Fang (cal Q1 2013 -40%) the underlying run-rate should improve as the company laps soft comparatives in H2 F13 (Q3 F13 revenues -40%) given the existing anti-extravagance campaign and slower Chinese New Year.

 

Scotch a key focus – continuing to grow leadership position

Diageo is the leader in Scotch, which accounts for nearly 50% of net sales value of international spirits in the region (vs cognac <20%). Over a four-year period, the company has widened its share leadership to 9% ahead its nearest competitor. The company has significantly extended its super-deluxe offerings with innovation and premiumisation contributing to price/mix of 10-19% in Scotch in the region over the past 18 months.

 

Premiumisation – growing the reserve business

The company has doubled the value of its reserve brand portfolio since 2010. Some 30% of the region’s A&P spend is focused against reserve brands. The focus here is predominantly in Scotch with a second Johnnie Walker House in place now, however reserve brand growth is also strong in other categories such as vodka.

 

EBIT margin improvement

On the call, the company indicated that the >100bp organic EBIT margin improvement in H1 will be replicated in H2, given scale efficiencies in A&P spending and overhead reductions. Over the medium term, the company sees sustainable operating margin improvement from economies of scale in A&P and benefits of the premiumisation strategy.

 

China – some short-term slowdown in baijiu.

In China, although Shui Jing Fang is less exposed to institutional government sales, the anti-extravagance campaign and the food safety allegation around baijiu, as well as its premium positioning, have had a negative impact on the run-rate of this business. Following 10% net sales growth and 12% operating profit growth in cal 2012, Shui Jing Fang sales and EBIT declined 40% in cal Q1 (against a tough comparative +51%). Although the company expects the baijiu category to remain soft throughout cal 2013, longer term the category should return to double-digit growth. With the category “going through a rough ride”, it would appear that the company would consider opportunities to add to its position in the Chinese baijiu market.

 

.however, super-deluxe Scotch performing well

Some 24% of Diageo’s Scotch business in China is super-deluxe. We believe that Scotch is less exposed to gifting than baijiu and cognac. Although the overall Scotch category was flat to 9M F13 in value terms, super deluxe grew +18% with Diageo’s business up double digits. Other brands such as Baileys (100k cases today) have been successfully seeded, and the company believes this could be a 1m-case brand in 10 years.

 

SE Asia: solid double-digit top-line growth

SE Asia accounts for c.30% of the region. The company is taking share growth in Scotch across all SE Asian markets, with Scotch growth +20% in Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines. Guinness continues to grow strongly (mid-teens growth).

 

Global Travel Retail

Some 70% of this business is premium and above, with the company focused on capturing the high-net-worth customer. The launch of the Johnnie Walker Explorers’ Club collection (November 2012) exclusive to Global Travel Retail is an important driver of premiumisation. Although there has been some destocking in Q3 F13 as customers have been more cash constrained as well as a reduction in spending by Chinese travellers, the company sees a rebound in H1 F14 in Global Travel Retail.

 

Mature markets – not all bad news

Korea remains a tough market given the structural decline in the traditional on-trade, with Windsor losing share in an increasingly competitive category following price increases (year-to-date sales -19%). Although the company is gaining share in vodka and Guinness, this has a negative impact on mix. The company sees Korea revenues in F14 flat to down low single digits. In Japan, the company grew sales +9% to 9M F13 through share gains; we believe the company is benefiting from the strong distribution power of partner Kirin. In Australia, the company has grown revenues +4% to 9M F13 given route to market and scale advantages.

 

United spirits

In India, the company continues to develop its model aiming for brands selling above USD 10/bottle. This focuses mainly on Scotch, but the company is developing high-end local spirits (Rowsons Reserve and Vat 69 growing double digits). Although Smirnoff has declined 2% in a weak vodka category, the company has strong underlying momentum with Johnnie Walker Red and Black growing double digit year to date. On United Spirits, the company expects the share purchase agreement to be completed by the end of F13. On the reduction of import tariffs on Scotch, discussions are ongoing, with progress appearing “closer than in the past”.

 

 

——

Takeaways from Beam Inc. (BEAM, Neutral) at the GS Consumer Products Symposium  

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

By Judy E. Hong , Michael Luddy and Jacob Feinstein

14 May 2013

 

Overall, Beam’s presentation was upbeat as the company appears well positioned in the attractive bourbon category and is maintaining a high level of innovation activity to drive healthy sales growth.

 

Key Points:

 

US spirits category remains healthy – Management sees sales growth for the US at about 4% with about 1.5pp from volume, 1pp from price, and 1.5pp from mix. In addition, spirits continues to take share from beer and BEAM estimates about 50 bp of spirits growth per year has come from share gains from beer since 2000.

 

Pricing low outside bourbon, but bourbon pricing has successfully stuck – Looking back, BEAM is pleased with its decision to lead on pricing in bourbon as that pricing has stuck despite being one of the few categories taking price. Price remains less attractive in vodka, which remains intensely competitive, as well as tequila, which continues to wade through an agave oversupply.

 

Bourbon growth is robust as it sits in nexus of key industry trends – Bourbon continues to benefit from expansion into the high end, adding flavored line extensions, and because it is a fairly mixable spirit.

 

Growth is concentrated at the higher price points – In BEAM’s bourbon portfolio, the higher the price point, the higher the growth rate the company is seeing. Because the average price of bourbon is about half of scotch and cognac, BEAM is optimistic that this ‘premiumization has ample runway.

 

Pinnacle growth continues and synergies now ramping – Pinnacle’s affordable price, quality brand perception, and constant brand innovation continues to make it a compelling brand.

 

Emerging markets continue to accommodate more international brands – Most emerging markets remain predominantly made up of local spirits, but there is a growing trend of demand for international spirits. This is particularly true for higher end spirits such as single malt scotch and cognac.

 

Re-directing ad spending to video and digital – TV/online video is now 50% of ad investment from 25% while digital marketing has gone to 35% from 10% of ad investment. BEAM considers itself a leader on the digital marketing front in the industry.

 

Rating and pricing information

Beam Inc. (N/N, $67.59)

 

 

——

Campari’s CEO and the ‘mystery’ vodka brand (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just-Drinks

By Andy Morton

13 May 2013

 

Gruppo Campari’s CEO, Bob Kunze-Concewitz, went a little off-piste in a conference call with analysts earlier today (13 May).

 

Asked his thoughts on vodka pricing in the US, bluff Bob bemoaned the lack of stability in the category, caused by “second-tier players” that refused to conform to the pricing strategies of the larger, “more disciplined participants”. Kunze-Concewitz even singled one of these smaller labels out – well, almost. He archly alluded to “a very important imported brand, which will be changing importers and distributing networks by the end of the year”, but stopped short of giving a name. A company spokesperson also refused to be drawn on which brand Kunze-Concewitz was referring to.

 

Which is strange, because he threw out enough clues for an educated guess. In November, SPI Group, which has been making changes around the world to its Stolichnaya distribution network, announced an end to its US agreement with William Grant & Sons. That deal expires at the end of this year, when SPI will set up its own import company.

 

 

——

Indiana: AG says he’ll defend Indiana cold beer sales law

 

Source: WDRB

May 14, 2013

 

Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller says he’ll defend the state’s position on limiting who can sell cold beer against a lawsuit by a trade group representing convenience stores and gas station owners that contend it’s unfair.

 

The Indiana Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association filed a lawsuit Tuesday in federal court in Indianapolis that calls Indiana’s law allowing only liquor stores and bars to sell cold beer arbitrary.

 

The lawsuit contends Indiana is the only state that regulates the temperature beer may be sold at and that there’s no legitimate purpose for the restriction.

 

The lawsuit names the state, the Indiana Alcohol and Tobacco Commission and its chairman as defendants. Spokesman Brandon Thomas said the commission would not comment on pending litigation.

 

 

——

Washington: Garza to head state Liquor Control Board

 

Source: Seattle Times

by Bob Young

May 14th

 

The Washington State Liquor Control Board announced today it has unanimously chosen Rick Garza to serve as its next agency director.

 

Garza, the agency’s deputy director, replaces Pat Kohler, who was recently appointed by Gov. Jay Inslee to lead the Washington State Department of Licensing.

 

According to a press release from the liquor board, Garza has led the agency’s policy, legislation and media relations. He also serves as its legislative and tribal liaison. Garza has been with the Liquor Control Board since 1997.

 

“Rick was a clear and unanimous choice by the board,” said Board Chair Sharon Foster. “Rick’s leadership on policy, legislative and tribal matters has been instrumental to the agency’s successes. He is regarded by stakeholders and legislators as an expert on many issues and is frequently called upon to help find solutions to difficult challenges.”

 

Gov. Jay Inslee lauded the Board’s choice for agency director.

 

“I have known Rick for many years and I’m thrilled the board selected him to lead the agency,” said Inslee. “He is a creative leader and a team player and I have full confidence in his ability to lead the agency during this important time.”

 

The LCB is drafting the rules, along with Colorado, that will govern the world’s only comprehensive systems of growing, processing and retailing marijuana for recreational use. The agency expects to begin accepting license applications in September.

 

Prior to joining the Liquor Control Board, Rick served 13 years as a staff member for the Washington State Legislature, including five years with the Washington State Senate and eight years with the state House. His legislative assignments included policy analyst in the state Senate, House of Representatives staff director, and adviser to House and Senate leadership.

 

 

——

GuestMetrics: On-premise wine prices being entirely driven by trade-up to higher price segments, offset by trade down from bottles to glasses with very little underlying rate

 

Source: GuestMetrics

May 14th

 

According to GuestMetrics, the overall average price for wine in full service restaurants and bars moderated slightly during the first quarter of 2013, the result of consumer trade-down to wine-by-the-glass offsetting the trade-up to higher priced wines taking place in the category. Similar to YTD off premise trends, there is very little in the way of underlying price increases taking place.

 

“While wine’s price/mix was up +1.0% during 2012 compared to the prior year, that moderated to +0.2% during the first quarter of 2013,” said Bill Pecoriello, CEO of GuestMetrics LLC.  “As we wrote about earlier in the year, wine-by-the-glass took share from wine-by-the-bottle in 2012 as consumers remained under economic pressure, and this trend has continued into this year.  While wine-by-the-glass accounted for 56% of wine sales in 2011, it increased to 59% in 2012, and moved up even further to 61% during 1Q13.  However, somewhat paradoxically, while consumers continued to trade down from by-the-bottle to by-the-glass, when they do order bottles or glasses of wine, they are increasingly choosing more expensive wine selections,” continued Pecoriello.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, while by-the-bottle saw year-over-year sales growth decelerate from -4.1% in 2012 to -4.7% in 1Q13, by-the-glass’ sales growth accelerated from +7.8% in 2012 to +8.8%, netting out in the slight acceleration in overall wine sales increasing from +2.6% in 2012 to +2.7% in 1Q13.

 

“During the first quarter of 2013, the average price paid for wine-by-the glass increased by +3% and the average price of wine-by-the-bottle increased by nearly 9%, continuing the premiumization trend we saw take place in 2012,” said Peter Reidhead, VP of Strategy and Insights at GuestMetrics. “The higher price paid was almost entirely due to mix with little to no actual rate increase in most price classes except slightly at the lower end.  The lack of underlying price increases is consistent with YTD trends in the off premise channels.   The Ultra-Premium segment continued to achieve strong share gains both in by-the-glass and by-the-bottle, despite consumers trading down to by-the-glass.  Within by-the-glass, the Ultra Premium’s share of sales increased from 8% in 2011 to 10% in 2012, and reached 13% in 1Q13.  In by-the-bottle, the premiumization was even more dramatic, with Ultra Premium’s share of sales going from 14% in 2011 to 18% in 2012, and reached 21% in 1Q13.  However, despite the premiumization taking place in the category, this was more than offset by the trade-down from bottle to glass, resulting in the slight moderation in the overall price/mix in the category.”

 

“The wine category is displaying dynamics that are rapidly changing in terms of what consumers are buying.  It is critical that restaurant operators have the accurate on-premise facts in to order to make decisions on which wines to offer and how to price them.   While consumers are increasingly migrating from by-the-bottle to by-the-glass due to the differential in the price tag, they nonetheless continue to migrate to more expensive choices within each, which is important for restaurant operators to know when deciding what wines to offer on the menu,” said Brian Barrett, President of GuestMetrics.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, the average price for wine-by-the-bottle was $46 while the average price for wine-by-the glass was slightly under $10 during the first quarter of 2013.         

 

About GuestMetrics LLC

GuestMetrics, LLC is revolutionizing how the hospitality industry operates.  Despite the dawn of the Digital Age having begun more than three decades ago, the hospitality industry essentially functions the same way it did centuries before.  GuestMetrics has cracked the code by collecting billions of  dollars in sales from tens of thousands of restaurants, and turning billions of raw transactions into intelligible data that is fundamentally transforming the business operations of everyone from the independently-owned bar/restaurant on the corner, to multi-national chains, to the food & beverage companies that supply them.  Please visit www.GuestMetrics.com for more information and to arrange for a free demonstration.

 

 

——

Restaurant Sciences’ Data Reveals Low and Mid-Range Beer Prices Climbing in US Restaurants & Bars

 

Super-Premium and Craft Beer Post Only Modest Increases

 

Source: Marketwired

May 14, 2013

 

Restaurant Sciences LLC, an independent firm that closely tracks food and beverage product sales throughout the foodservice industry in North America, unveiled that the high-volume premium and sub-premium beers popular in America — names like Budweiser, Coors Light, Miller Lite, Pabst Blue Ribbon, etc. — have seen a 3.5% to 6.8% price jump in the nation’s eating and drinking establishments over the past seven months (October ’12 thru April ’13). The accompanying chart shows the increases by price segment.

 

“While all the attention has been on Craft (Ultra-Premium) beers, the price of mainstay brands in the mid-price (Premium) tier have risen more dramatically. And traditionally lower-priced beers such as Pabst Blue Ribbon have seen sizeable double-digit price increases in both restaurants and bars & nightclubs. In fact, the only segment of the restaurant industry holding the price line on these beers is the value-conscious Family Dining segment, with average per-party checks under $40,” said Ellis.

 

“Across all restaurant and bar segments, and all beverage alcohol categories, the one constant is rapidly increasing prices in the fine-dining tier,” said Ellis. “This segment had some of the hardest-hit establishments in the last recession, and average drink prices there are increasing with a vengeance.”

 

About Restaurant Sciences

Restaurant Sciences is the premier provider of syndicated data and insights on food and beverage consumption in restaurants, bars, nightclubs and other foodservice establishments. The company delivers market share, market basket, competitive analysis, pricing, promotional, trend, segmentation and custom analytics to food and beverage manufacturers and distributors, as well as the broader industry they serve. Restaurant Sciences transforms over $1 Billion per month in guest check-level sales information into detailed data and insights across all segments of the foodservice landscape in the United States and Canada. Insights are delivered online through their business intelligence tool or through custom analytics. Visit www.restaurantsciences.com.

 

 

——

Asian investors snap up three more Bordeaux properties

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Tuesday 14 May 2013

 

Chateau de Pic in the Cadillac Cotes de Bordeaux, Chateau l’Enclos in Sainte Foy la Grande and Chateau Patarabet in Saint Emilion are the latest Bordeaux estates to reportedly pass into the hands of Asian investors.

 

This follows the recent announcement of the sale of Chateau La Fleur Jonquet in the Graves to Chinese architect Wengcheng Li.

 

Chateau Patarabet’s website has been announcing full sale of its stock ‘following change of owner’ for several months, but the final document has not yet been signed.

 

The 9ha estate has been owned by the Gombeau-Bordas family since 1920, but Madame Bordas was not prepared to comment on the expected date of completion.

 

‘As long as I am still owner, I have no comment to make,’ she told Decanter.com. It is believed, however, that the purchaser is a Singaporean investor who already owns one property in Saint Emilion.

 

Chateau L’Enclos has reportedly been sold to Cheng Qu, owner of the Haichang Group, and the driving force behind the Dalian wine festival in China.

 

He is already owner of numerous Bordeaux estates including Chateau Baby (also in Sainte Foy), Chateau Chenu-Lafitte and Chateau Branda. This 24-ha property has been owned by Isabelle and Eric Bonneville since late 2002, and has Stéphane Derenoncourt as wine consultant.

 

Another recent transaction, a spokesperson at the chateau confirmed, is the 44ha Chateau de Pic in Cadillac. The estate was on the market for at least three years prior to its purchase by Chinese industrialist Mr Wu, whose principal activity is the distribution of baiju alcohol in China. Wu has employed a Chinese manager to live full-time at the property.

 

There are at least two other transactions that are due to go through in the next month, Decanter.com understands, including one large Fronsac property.

 

 

——

Wine Forger’s Handbook warns of dangers of fake wines

 

Source: Decanter

by John Stimpfig

Tuesday 14 May 2013

 

A new eBook warning of the dangers of counterfeit wines has just been published online.

 

The Wine Forger’s Handbook is by wine journalist Stuart George and art crime expert Dr Noah Charney.

 

The slim volume gives a short history of forgery and fraud in the wine world, before going on to detail two short case studies covering two of the best known alleged fine wine fraudsters of recent times: Hardy Rodenstock and Rudy Kurniawan.

 

It also functions as a guide with practical tips and a checklist of actions on how to avoid becoming a victim of counterfeit wine.

 

The book comes at a time when collector awareness and press interest in the subject of fraud has never been higher, after series of high-profile legal cases.

 

In a New York court last month, a jubilant Bill Koch was recently awarded US$12m following counterfeit lawsuit against fellow wine collector Eric Greenberg.

 

Last month, Rudy Kurniawan pleaded not guilty in a Manhattan Federal Court to a two-count indictment of selling counterfeit wines and attempting to defraud a finance company out of US$3m.

 

His trial date has been set for 9 September. Burgundy producer Laurent Ponsot, Aubert de Villaine of Domaine de la Romanée Conti and Christophe Roumier of Domaine Georges Roumier will all give evidence by video link.

 

There are other anti-fraud guides on the market. Six years ago Russell H Frye, another victim of wine fraud, set up the website www.wineauthentication.com, and in 2011 the UK’s Wine and Spirit Trade Association published an investment guide subtitled, ‘Don’t be a victim of wine fraud’.

 

‘Today, there are constant reports of fake wine being produced in Asia, resembling full scale counterfeit manufacturing operations,’ warns Frye. ‘In addition, we believe that there are still individuals operating all over the world as Rudy Kurniawan is alleged to have done. The best advice is to verify whenever possible. Caveat emptor.’

 

 

——

BARON DE LEY (+)  Q1 13 Results: Very strong figures

 

Source: Exane BNP

May 14, 2013

 

TP: EUR66 . Upside: 33%

Beverages (-) . Spain . Price (13 May. 13): EUR49.8

 

Q1 13 results: Strong figures

Q1 13 figures were above our estimates. Sales grew 6% versus 2%e. The main surprise came from the domestic market, which grew 4% versus -2%e. Exports climbed 8%, above our +7%e and well above the guidance for the full year (3%). Domestic demand grew largely on the back of bulk volumes (bottled wine, which grew 2.7%, declined 2.2% domestically). However, margins did not suffer: EBITDA margin was at 42.4%, and EBITDA rose 9% to EUR7.8m. Net profit grew 11% and EPS, which did not include the recent 4% buyback, was 12.6% above last year’s level.

 

Other points of interest

As always, FCF generation was very strong. Baron generated around EUR9m of FCF in Q1 13, or close to 50% of sales. Including long-term financial deposits, net cash came in at EUR70m at the end of the period. These figures are in line with our FCF estimate of EUR33m for FY13.

 

Outlook and estimates

We have maintained our estimates. We forecast 2% sales growth in 2013, with domestic sales flat and exports growing 5%. We think the Q1 trends should not be extrapolated for the whole year. April was a very weak month (probably due to the Easter effect in Q1) and we are comfortable with our FY13 sales estimate. However, we think that consensus has not taken into account the good momentum in EBITDA. The consensus estimate is for an average 3% decrease in EBITDA in FY13 versus our +6%, which leads our EPS to be 11% higher than consensus. We think consensus should catch up with our estimates after these results.

 

Investment case: Outperform reiterated

The strong cash generation underpins our Outperform rating. Sales are flat but margins are improving thanks to declining COGS and better opex, which alongside the stable capex and WC inflow translate into a FCF/sales of more than 40%. Furthermore, the company is trading below 6x EV/EBIT13 and at a discount of more than 50% to champagne companies.

 

 

——

Precept Wine Acquires Yamhela Vineyard in Yamhill, Oregon

 

Ultra-premium Pinot Noir site will realize its full potential as part of this rising Northwest wine company

 

Source: WineBusiness.com

May 13th

 

Underscoring its growth strategy and marking its 10-year anniversary, Precept Wine chief executive officer Andrew Browne announced the company’s purchase of Yamhela vineyard, located in the renowned Yamhill-Carlton American Viticultural Area in Yamhill, Oregon, part of the overarching Willamette Valley AVA. Terms of the sale are undisclosed.

 

“In pursuit of being the vineyard and winery leader over the next decade in the Northwest, we will continue to develop, acquire and grow our business working from a strong foundation of Northwest vineyards and wines with powerful brand names,” Browne said. “We are hunting for world-class sites that support this strategy, and Yamhela is a prime example within our Oregon portfolio.”

 

Originally conceived by its previous ownership as a mixed-use site suited to vineyards, timber, and real estate, Precept Wine vice president of vineyards David J. Minick said the company intends to focus on Yamhela’s premium winegrape-growing potential. Precept will expand the 30 planted acres to a fully realized total of 120 planted acres over five years. The property has a total of 374 gross acres; its vineyard was first planted in 2007. Its neighboring vineyards are held in the highest esteem by local industry peers.

 

“Yamhela is perched on one of the finest sites for Pinot Noir in the Yamhill-Carlton AVA. Its neighbors, including the legendary Shea Vineyard, are among the most sought after vineyards in Oregon,” said Tim Ramey, principal of Zenith Vineyard in Salem. “Precept Wine’s purchase of Yamhela is not its first venture in Oregon, but this will clearly be a cornerstone of the company’s Oregon strategy.”

 

By extension of Precept Wine’s ownership through the Baty family and the family’s Winemakers LLC holdings, its existing Oregon interests include the second largest winery in the state, 12th & Maple Wine Company, in Dundee, Ore., and approximately 570 acres across four vineyards in the Willamette (Howell Prairie, Battle Creek and Waldo Hills) and Ribbon Ridge (Roe) AVAs. In Oregon it produces Battle Creek, Primarius, and Windy Bay brands, all Pinot Noir, the latter sold exclusively to the on-trade. Precept Wine is the only known wine company to have vineyards and wineries in three Northwest states: Oregon, Washington and Idaho.

 

About Precept Wine: Seattle-based Precept Wine is a top 20 North American wine producer that owns and operates vineyards, wineries, and tasting rooms across Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and enjoys a joint venture in the McLaren Vale, Australia. Founded in 2003 by Andrew Browne, the company’s wineries have garnered more than 350 combined best buys and critical scores exceeding 90 points. Learn more at www.preceptwine.com.

 

 

——

GLAZER’S, INC. ANNOUNCES APPOINTMENT OF THOMAS ROWEN TO SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT SALES ARKANSAS

 

Source: Glazer’s

May 14, 2013

 

Glazer’s today announces that Thomas Rowen has been promoted to Senior Vice President of Sales for Arkansas, effective June 1, 2013. Rowen will be responsible for the performance of the Sales organization in the state. Rowen will report to Scott Rawlings, Glazer’s Regional President for Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Tennessee.

 

Rowen started his career with Glazer’s in 2003 as the General Sales Manager for DMH in Iowa. Rowen advanced to the role of State President for Iowa in 2007, which is his current role in the organization. Prior to joining Glazer’s, Rowen held positions of varying responsibility with companies such as The Seagram Beverage Company, Constellation Wine Company, Coca-Cola, and The House of Seagram. Rowen attended Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff, Arizona where he received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and Management.

 

Scott Rawlings states, “I am excited to have Thom join our Arkansas team. His experience and energy will be a great addition for our continued focus on supplier performance in Arkansas.”

 

 

——

Patrón Spirits Appoints Paul Rothenberg to Vice President, On-Premise National Accounts

 

Source: Patron Spirits

May 15th

 

Patrón Spirits, one of the fastest-growing companies in the global beverage alcohol industry, announces that Paul Rothenberg has joined the company as Vice President, On-Premise National Accounts. Reporting to Executive Vice President of Sales, North America Phil Gervasi, Paul will lead Patrón’s national on-premise team and work closely with Patrón’s U.S. distributor partners and national restaurant, bar, hotel and concession accounts.

 

Paul joins Patrón Spirits from the Tampa Bay Buccaneers where he was Chief Sales Ticketing Officer, responsible for all ticket sales and ticket sales channels. Paul’s 24-year career in sales and marketing began at Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, where he spent 11 years in the spirits industry. From there, he joined Universal Orlando where he was Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Universal City Walk, running one of the largest nightlife and entertainment complexes in the country. He was then promoted to Vice President of Park Sales, overseeing major ticket channels and all events at Universal Orlando Resort.

 

“We couldn’t be more thrilled to welcome Paul to our team. Not only does he bring with him a wealth of experience and industry relationships, his proven management skills and professionalism will only help strengthen our growing organization,” says Gervasi.

 

 

——

Enterprise Inns rejects government plans for pub industry

 

Source: FT

By Duncan Robinson

May 14th

 

The chief executive of Enterprise Inns has claimed that the government vastly overstated the number of complaints made against his pub chain in a bid to regulate large pub companies more tightly.

 

The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills said that landlords had made hundreds of complaints to the British Institute of Innkeeping about pub companies such as Enterprise Inns when it announced plans for a statutory code of conduct for the sector in April.

 

But figures from the BII show that while it received 276 calls from Enterprise Inns’ landlords over four years, only four of these were complaints.

 

Ted Tuppen, chief executive at Enterprise Inns, said: “Sorry isn’t a word [BIS] have quite managed to say yet.”

 

He added: “A major plank of their decision to go against major government strategy to reduce bureaucracy has been somewhat damaged by them misunderstanding the data provided by the BII.”

 

A BIS spokesperson acknowledged the mistake, but added: “The data still shows that tenants from larger companies were significantly more likely to contact a helpline than tenants of smaller companies or those who ran free houses.”

 

Pub companies including Punch Taverns and Enterprise Inns have lined up to criticise the government’s plan to introduce a statutory code of conduct for the industry’s larger players. But the Campaign for Real Ale, which lobbies for community pubs and drinkers’ rights, has said that the reforms were “urgently needed”.

 

Enterprise Inns struggled with poor weather in its half-year results, with heavy snow in January and an unseasonably cold March resulting in a 4.2 per cent drop in like-for-like net income for the six months to March 31. Revenues fell 9 per cent year on year to £312m.

 

Mr Tuppen estimated that without the cold weather and the collapse of its wine and spirits supplier, WaverleyTBS, the drop in net income would have been about 1.5 per cent on a like-for-like basis. Enterprise Inns said that it was confident of achieving like-for-like growth in the second half.

 

Profit before tax fell 55 per cent year-on-year to £29m as the group cut the number of pubs in its estate. Enterprise Inns sold 161 pubs over the period, generating £54m in cash. Included in this figure were 10 “top quality” pubs, which were sold after the company received above market rate offers of, on average, 14 times earnings for them.

 

Of the pubs it sold, around half will continue to trade as pubs, while the remainder will be converted into alternative use.

 

Diluted earnings per share halved from 10.6p to 5p. Shares in Enterprise Inns fell 0.9 per cent to 99p.

 

 

——

Ilinois: Illinois passes law to make Busch divest beer distributorship

 

Source: Chicago Tribune

By Emily Bryson York Tribune reporter

May 14, 2013

 

A bill that will require Anheuser-Busch to sell its minority stake in Chicago’s City Beverage has passed the Illinois Senate.

 

Anheuser and the Illinois Liquor Control Commission have been involved in a string of litigation on this issue since the commission blocked the world’s largest brewer from acquiring City Beverage in 2010. The matter was sent to the General Assembly for clarification.

 

Most states regulate alcohol sales through a “three-tier system,” designed to separate manufacturing, distribution and retail sales among distinct business interests.

 

In a statement, Sen. Tony Munoz said the bill “reaffirms Illinois’ policy and the state’s regulatory structure that manufacturers of beer, including out-of-state brewers, are prohibited from holding a distributor’s license, from owning any ownership interest in a distributorship and from exercising vertical integration between a manufacturer of beer and a distributor or importing distributor through any ownership interest or through control of the distributor or importing distributor.”

 

The Illinois House had passed the bill in April. Upon receipt from the General Assembly, Gov. Pat Quinn will have 60 days to sign the bill. Anheuser has until January 2015 to sell its stake in City Beverage, its largest local distributor.

 

BDT Capital, an investment firm owned by Byron Trott, now owns the remainder of City.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Pa. senator sees support to privatize wine, liquor

 

Source: Phillyburbs.com

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

 

A second hearing in front of Pennsylvania state senators Tuesday on the liberalization of Pennsylvania’s wine, beer and liquor laws appeared to solidify support for legislation that would allow private-sector sales of wine and liquor, but would not end every aspect of state control, as Gov. Tom Corbett has sought.

 

Many questions by senators on the Law and Justice Committee probed for whether representatives of groups that make and sell alcoholic beverages could support a plan similar to one favored by the committee chairman.

 

“I heard a lot of reinforcement for moving ahead, changing the system, allowing some private access points for wine and spirits, but I also heard a lot of testimony saying we could live within the current license structure,” Sen. Charles McIlhinney, the Bucks County Republican who chairs the committee, told reporters after the hearing.

 

Still, he said, “I’m still trying to craft a bill though that gets 26 votes, so we’ll see what happens in the next month.”

 

The hearing, the second of three that are planned, was motivated by pressure from Corbett to shut down the Depression-era state-controlled wine and liquor store system and allow the sale of alcoholic beverages by grocery stores, big box stores, convenience stores and other outlets.

 

A bill that passed the House in March would create 1,200 new private wine and liquor store licenses and allow thousands of bars, restaurants and grocery stores to begin selling bottles of wine. Corbett wants a bill on his desk by July 1.

 

McIlhinney is touting a plan that would allow the state’s approximately 12,000 existing private beer licensees _ eateries, bars and distributors, as well as supermarkets or convenience stores with a restaurant-style beer license _ to buy licenses to sell wine and liquor and shatter state control of the goods.

 

That is “10 times the number in the House bill, albeit probably 30,000 less than the governor wanted,” McIlhinney told reporters.

 

However, McIlhinney differs from the House and Corbett in two crucial elements on the subject of privatization, which has motivated the entire debate.

 

McIlhinney wants to allow the state Liquor Control Board to decide when private-sector service, selection and supply of wine and liquor is strong enough to shut down a local state store. Corbett had sought legislation that explicitly shut down the approximately 600 state stores, while the House plan created a set of competitive circumstances that would require the shutdown of state stores.

 

Also, McIlhinney may opt to keep the state-controlled wholesale wine and liquor distribution system, with changes to improve the delivery to licensees like restaurants, instead of shifting to a private system that is an “oligopoly” controlled by a couple companies.

 

“I’m not interested in turning it over to a small number of wholesalers that end up with … a brand-specific monopoly,” McIlhinney said.

 

The House plan and the governor’s plan are effectively dead in the Senate, and McIlhinney stressed that people are more concerned with price and accessibility and less concerned with who owns the store.

 

“The governor announced privatization in January, and I went back to my district and asked my constituents at town hall meetings and they said, `Yeah, I’d love to buy a six-pack in the beer store.’ Well that’s not privatization, McIlhinney said. “It’s evolved in the public opinion that the bigger, comprehensive `how we buy all types of alcohol’ is what’s at stake.”

 

Under McIlhinney’s plan, some beer licensees could switch entirely to wine and liquor or stock none at all.

 

McIlhinney also has suggested that he would be willing to relax the restaurant-style seating, food and space requirements that supermarkets, convenience stores and other retailers must obey if they want to sell alcoholic beverages. Meanwhile, beer licensees would be free to sell in a wider variety of volumes.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Hearing on Pennsylvania liquor privatizations plan focuses on retail sales

 

Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

By Kate Giammarise

May 14, 2013

 

A Pennsylvania Senate committee heard this afternoon from a plethora of retail interests with a stake in alcohol sales — large and small grocery chains, beer distributors, bar owners, wineries — in the second hearing on Gov. Tom Corbett’s liquor privatization plan.

 

“The current system does not work,” said Matt English, chairman of the board of the Pennsylvania Restaurant and Lodging Association.

 

Many retail trade groups have remained formally neutral, saying they would like to see changes to the existing system but not wanting their members to be hurt who had a vested interest in current licenses.

 

At a prior hearing, senators heard from law enforcement, addiction counselors and advocates against drunk driving who warned against social ills that could come with what they believed will be easier access to liquor in a privately-run system.

 

In March, the state House passed a bill that creates 1,200 licenses for the sale of wine and spirits, first available to beer distributors, with the possibility of up to 600 additional licenses as state stores are phased out.

 

Groceries could buy licenses to sell wine but not beer, except through existing restaurant licenses.

 

 

——

Canada: Get the Facts on Privatized Alcohol Sales-MADD Canada Releases Newly-Updated Alcohol Policy Paper

 

Source: Marketwired

May 14, 2013

 

MADD Canada is pleased to share its newly-updated alcohol policy paper, “Provincial Liquor Boards: Meeting the Best Interests of Canadians.” The paper supports the role of provincial liquor boards and outlines the negative health and public safety impacts associated with privatized alcohol sales.

 

In Canada, all provinces except Alberta have provincially-run liquor boards which oversee the distribution and sale of alcohol. Alberta’s alcohol sales are conducted by private retailers. Semi-privatized systems exist in: Quebec, which has provincially-run liquor stores but also allows the sale of beer and wine in corner stores and other retail locations; and in British Columbia where alcohol is sold in both private outlets and government run stores.

 

“There is ongoing pressure in some provinces to privatize alcohol sales and allow beer and wine to be sold in convenience stores and other retail locations,” said MADD Canada Chief Executive Officer Andrew Murie. “There are some who suggest there is no negative impact of selling alcohol alongside pop and milk, but the research and experiences in Canada and other countries tell a very different story. Alcohol is no ordinary commodity and it should not be sold as one.”

 

Alcohol is linked with more than 65 medical conditions and is a contributing factor in injuries and deaths caused by illness, impaired driving, homicides, suicides, falls, drowning, assaults, fires and other adverse events that threaten public safety and community well-being.

 

The policy paper outlines Canadian and international research which clearly and consistently shows that privatized systems result in increased access to alcohol which in turn leads to increased alcohol consumption and alcohol-related problems in society. In British Columbia, for example, researchers found that areas with more private stores than government-run stores had significantly higher rates of alcohol-related deaths involving local residents. There was a 27.5% increase in alcohol-related deaths for every extra private liquor store per 1,000 British Columbians.

 

“MADD Canada strongly supports the provincial liquor corporation model as the best way to regulate sales of alcohol,” Mr. Murie said. “These models are the best choice for protecting the public interest while meeting consumer needs.”

 

Provincial liquor boards regulate access to alcohol through outlet locations, limits on hours of operation, minimum pricing and taxes. Provincial liquor boards have intrinsic controls, comprehensive staff training programs and extensive social responsibility programs to protect the public and prevent the sale of alcohol to minors and intoxicated customers.

 

It is not only MADD Canada which supports the government-controlled model of alcohol sales; the World Health Organization, Canada’s National Alcohol Strategy and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health have stated that government-controlled systems of liquor sales are the best option for controlling alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm in society.

 

“As elected officials are faced with questions about privatizing alcohol sales, we would ask that they consider the impact it would have if the number of alcohol sales outlets in their communities were doubled, tripled or more,” Mr. Murie said. “The focus should not be on deregulation of alcohol sales, but rather on maintaining and building on the current system which protects the safety of Canadians while meeting customer needs.”

 

For more information, please see MADD Canada’s paper, Provincial Liquor Boards: Meeting the Best Interests of Canadians, in the Resource Library on MADD Canada’s web site at www.madd.ca.

Our Webpage

www.franklinliquors.com

Facebook

www.facebook.com/franklinliquorsMA

Twitter

www.twitter.com/franklinliquors

 

 

Liquor Industry News 5-14-13

May 14, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday May 14th 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic FLOWER Day.

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

 

US Spirits – Nielsen Data – Price/mix now consistently strong

 

No sign of any weakening of the trend

 

Source: Nomura

May 13, 2013

 

European Beverages

Sector View: Bearish

Ian Shackleton – NIplc

 

Price/ mix continues to be strong

AC Nielsen released US spirits data for four weeks to 27 April 2013. Pricing was positive at +3.8%, slightly lower than previous month’s +4.3%, but in line with YTD figures (+3.9%). We had noted that NABCA pricing had stepped up since June, as price increases were made early by the control states; now both the Nielsen and NABCA data (March +3.5%) are consistently showing some rebasing upwards of pricing into the +3-4% range.

 

Volume sees some dip in momentum

After adjusting for the reclassification of Washington state (which is now an open state, included in Nielsen data), total industry volumes were negative at -1.6% vs strong comps at +3.8% and softer than the previous month’s +1.3%. Although volume growth was negative, we do not see this as a change in trend and remain upbeat on the US spirits outlook. Certainly there has been no company commentary to suggest any slowdown in the volume dynamic for the industry. Remember that Nielsen only accounts for c10% of US spirit volumes.

 

Diageo outperforms on pricing – remains our preferred investment

As expected, Diageo’s pricing continues to be better than the industry per Nielsen, at +5.2% (vs industry +3.8%), but vs previous month +5.9. However, this continues to be at the expense of volume loss -7.0%. Diageo in its 1H results had indicated that peers are now taking pricing higher across most categories, suggesting a more rationale pricing environment, and also flagged that taking pricing at the 2-3% level every year looks achievable in the US. This appears to be true with the recent Nielsen data showing improvement in price/mix for most companies. Within the spirits space, we continue to prefer Diageo given its substantial exposure to the US (c40% of EBIT) together with further upside potential from M&A. In addition, the slowdown in momentum in China is likely to have a more adverse effect on Remy (Reduce) and Pernod (Neutral) given their high exposure to that region. Estimated profit exposure to China – Remy c30%, Pernod c15% and Diageo c1%.

 

 

——

Nielsen Spirits: April data slows across the board on weak volume

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

May 13th

 

Industry sales grew only +1.6% in April on weaker volume

Spirits data in Nielsen-tracked xAOC (food, drug, mass, WMT) increased +1.6% for the four weeks ended April 27th. Price/mix was healthy at +3.2%, but volume inflected negatively (-1.6%) for the first time since 2010. Sales and volume were well below 52-week trends, while pricing was slightly above. Among major categories, Scotch led growth at +11.5%, followed by bourbon (+8.2%), Canadian whiskey (+7.8%), vodka (+1.7%), gin (-1.9%), rum (-3.1%), and tequila (-3.1%). The white liquor categories, along with brandy/cognac, slowed on a sequential basis. Calendar alignment may have had a slight impact, as pre-Easter purchases (Easter was March 31st this year vs. April 8th last year) would have fallen in last month’s data this year vs. April data in 2012.

 

BEAM sales decelerate to +1.3%

BEAM’s overall company sales grew only +1.3%, driven by +4.4% price/mix and -2.9% volume. This is both a sequential (sales up +6.7%) and y-o-y deceleration (+12.2% last year). Core Jim Beam was strong, up +5.4%, in line with recent mid-single-digit trends. Maker’s Mark decelerated slightly but was still up +14.5%, despite a -1420bp reduction in percent sold on promo. Pinnacle and Skinny Girl both decelerated this period, as the broader vodka slowed meaningfully (+1.7% this period vs. +8.9% year-ago).

 

BF_B sales also decelerate, up +2.5%; JD back to LSD growth

BF_B sales were up +2.5% this period, driven by +2.6% price/mix and -0.1% volume. Sales/volume came in below recent trends, while price/mix was stronger. Core Jack Daniels grew +1.9% this period, a sequential slowdown from last month’s +5.0% print but broadly in line with the 6-month average of +2.3%. SoCo sales grew +1.0% this period, while Woodford Reserve was up +29.3%, reflecting the strength of ultra-premium whiskey. Finlandia sales grew +8.4% this period, lapping a -15.6% year-ago comp.

 

STZ leads the category in this channel; sales up +8.7%

STZ spirit sales grew +8.7% this period, on +10.3% volume and -1.5% price/mix drag. This is a slight sequential deceleration, but a year-over-year improvement and in line with the 52-week average of +9.1% sales growth. SVEDKA continues its impressive double-digit growth, up +13.6% this period despite a weaker vodka category.

 

 

——

Campari First-Quarter Profit Misses Estimates Amid Sales Slump

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Clementine Fletcher

May 13, 2013

 

Davide Campari-Milano SpA (CPR), the maker of Wild Turkey bourbon, reported first-quarter profit that missed estimates as sales fell because of weak shipments to Italian retailers and bad weather in Germany.

 

Earnings before interest and tax dropped 18 percent to 51.5 million euros ($66.9 million) in the three months through March 31, the company said today in a statement. The average estimate of 12 analysts was 60.1 million euros. Sales excluding the effect of acquisitions and disposals slid 9 percent.

 

Milan-based Campari had warned that some sales in Italy recorded in the first quarter of last year would this year be booked in the second and third quarters as a change in the country’s shipment law led retailers to delay new orders. The company got 29 percent of revenue last year from Italy. The new law reduced sales by about 25 million euros in the first quarter, it said, adding that it may not recoup the losses.

 

“The results in the first, and traditionally low-season, quarter of 2013 were poor, due to the one-off impact of destocking in Italy,” Chief Executive Officer Bob Kunze-Concewitz said today in the statement. The company also suffered “continued weakness in Germany” because of bad weather and a commercial dispute that affected the Campari and Aperol brands.

 

Campari fell as much as 3.8 percent in Milan trading and was down 3.2 percent at 5.97 euros as of 1:25 p.m.

 

“We expect the evolution in consumption trends and the potential persistence of poor weather conditions in Italy and in euro-zone markets to be the key challenges to the group’s ability to recover the first-quarter one-off destocking impact over the next quarters,” Kunze-Concewitz said.

 

Revenue rose 13 percent to 315.2 million euros after the company bought Lascelles deMercado & Co. last year to add Jamaican rum Appleton as it pushes into emerging markets and expands in the U.S. and Canada. The inclusion of the business depressed operating profit as a percentage of sales, as did Italian drinkers choosing less pricy drinks, Campari said.

 

Sales improved in the U.S., Latin America and Russia, aided by gains for Skyy vodka, the company said.

 

 

——

Campari: Poor results in small first quarter 2013 mainly due to the ‘one-off’ destocking in Italy

 

Positive perimeter contribution thanks to Lascelles deMercado acquisition

 

Source: Marco Fusco, D’Antona&Partners / Campari

May 13th

 

RESULTS HIGHLIGHTS

.         Sales: ? 315.2 million (+12.9%, organic change -9.0%)

.         Contribution after A&P: ? 115.1 million (-1.6%, organic change -13.8%, 36.5% of sales)

.         EBITDA pre one-offs: ? 57.1 million (-20.0%, organic change -26.6%, 18.1% of sales)

.         EBIT pre one-offs: ? 47.6 million (-25.3%, organic change -23.3%, 15.1% of sales)

.         Group pre-tax profit: ? 39.4 million (-25.4%)

.         Net financial debt at ? 914.1 million as of 31 March 2013 (? 869.7 million as of 31 December 2012)

 

The Board of Directors of Davide Campari-Milano S.p.A. (Reuters CPRI.MI – Bloomberg CPR IM) approved today the consolidated results for the quarter ending 31 March 2013.

 

Bob Kunze-Concewitz, Chief Executive Officer: ‘As anticipated, the results in the first, and traditionally low season, quarter of 2013 were poor, due to the ‘one-off’ impact of destocking in Italy, generated by so called article 62 which introduced a binding time limit to the payment terms, which determined a significant deterioration of the sales mix, and further exacerbated the weak local consumption trends. Results were strong in the Americas, showing continued positive momentum in the US market and improvements in Latin America, and Eastern Europe (particularly Russia), offsetting continued weakness in Germany, exacerbated by very poor weather conditions, and softness in Australia. Moreover, the integration and development activities of the Lascelles deMercado business are progressing in line with plan, and were marked by the transition of the international business into the Group network. Looking forward , the outlook for the current year remains unchanged. In particular, we expect the evolution in consumption trends and the potential persistence of poor weather conditions in Italy and in Eurozone markets to be the key challenges to the Group’s ability to recover the Q1 ‘one-off’ destocking impact over the next quarters.’.

 

In the first quarter of 2013 Group sales totalled ? 315.2 million showing a reported growth of +12.9% and an organic change of -9.0% (? 25.0 million in absolute terms). The exchange rates effect was negative by -1.6%. The perimeter effect was positive at +23.4%, driven by the newly-acquired Jamaican rum company Lascelles deMercado&Co. Ltd. (‘LdM’).

 

It should be noted that, as anticipated, the overall negative sales organic change was mainly attributable to a technical effect of so called article 62  (introducing a binding time limit to the payment terms that can be extended to the clientele) on the summer load program in Italy (a commercial initiative usually implemented in the first months of the year ahead of the summer seasonality consumption peak). The consequence was a ‘one-off’ destocking effect of ? 25 million on sales in the first quarter of 2013, which determined a significant deterioration of the sales mix and, consequently, a negative impact on operating margins. Moreover, the impact of the new LdM business, although in line with plans both in absolute terms and marginality, generated a further dilution in the Group margins driven by the higher concentration of lower margin non-core sugar and merchandise businesses vs. low seasonality spirits&wines in the first quarter.

 

CONSOLIDATED SALES OF THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2013

Looking at sales by region in the first quarter of 2013, the Americas (45.1% of total Group sales) posted an overall growth of +66.7%, with a strong organic increase of +10.8%, thanks to the sustained growth across all markets, a perimeter effect of +60.2% thanks to LdM, and an exchange rate effect of -4.4%. In the U.S. (19.6% of total Group sales) sales registered an organic increase of +7.6%, driven by double digit growth in the Wild Turkey franchise as well as the continued positive performances of the SKYY franchise, Espolón and Cabo Wabo tequilas and Campari, a perimeter effect of +0.4% (due to LdM) and an exchange rate effect of -0.7%. Sales in Brazil (4.0% of total Group sales) registered an organic growth of +22.4%, thanks to accelerating performances of premium brands (SKYY, Campari, and Sagatiba) as well as a partial recovery of local brands (Dreher, Old Eight and Drury’s), also due to an easy comparison base. Sales in the other Americas (21.5% of total Group sales) showed an organic growth of +14.0%, mainly thanks to a strong performance in Argentina (Cinzano, Old Smuggler and Campari). Perimeter change in the Other Americas was +320.4%, driven by the consolidation of LdM (Jamaica reaching 14.8% of Group sales in the first quarter 2013). Exchange rate effect was -9.9%.

 

The Italian market (23.8% of total Group sales) recorded an overall decline of -26.2%, attributable to an organic performance of -26.3% and a positive perimeter effect of +0.1%. The negative organic performance was driven by the expected destocking effect, linked to the introduction of the above mentioned article 62 which has further exacerbated the local weak consumption trend. The organic change excluding the ‘one-off’ destocking effect would have been negative by low/mid single digits. The key brands (Campari, Campari Soda and SKYY Vodka) recorded a strong decline in shipments; the wine portfolio declined, suffering from a slowdown in the restaurant channel. Soft drinks were also heavily affected by the above mentioned trade destocking as well as by the overall slowdown in consumption in the traditional day-bars channel.

Sales in the rest of Europe (19.2% of total Group sales) declined by -2.8%, driven by a negative organic change of -8.8%, a positive perimeter effect of +6.5%, thanks to a new distribution agreement in Germany as well as LdM, and a negative exchange rate effect of -0.5%. The organic performance was driven by continued softness of Aperol and Cinzano sparkling wine in Germany, exacerbated by very poor weather conditions. Russia on the contrary was up +52.9% showing strong results across the key Cinzano and Mondoro brands. Other European markets registered mixed results with Austria and Switzerland positive trends more than offset by decrease in France, Spain and Greece.

 

Sales in the rest of the world (including Global Travel Retail), which accounted for 11.9% of total Group sales, grew by +24.5% overall, with a negative organic change of -6.9% and a negative exchange rate effect of -1.5%. and a perimeter effect of +32.9% thanks to LdM. The organic sales decline was driven by weak shipments of the Wild Turkey franchise and Riccadonna sparkling wines, due to tough comps (+41.7% in 1Q 2012) and heightened competitive pressure on core bourbon and RTD’s in Australia. A positive development was also achieved in the region’s other key markets, including China, Nigeria and GTR.

 

Looking at sales by the key brands, regarding spirits (71.1% of Group sales) Campari declined by -12.4% impacted by weak shipments in Italy, due to so called article 62 introduction, in part offset by a good performance in Brazil and continued traction in international markets, in particular in U.S., Argentina and Nigeria. Aperol registered a negative organic performance of -15.3%, affected by continued weakness in Germany which was exacerbated by bad weather, in part offset by a positive performance in Italy (despite destocking) and other international markets. Overall organic growth excluding Germany was +4.8%. SKYY sales achieved an organic growth of +1.9%, driven by a positive performance in the US thanks to SKYY Infusions’ continued success and positive momentum behind core. Good results continued in key international markets, particularly Brazil. The Wild Turkey franchise registered an organic change of -0.3%, due to the mixed effect of strong growth in US offset by softness in Australia and Japan, as well as a tough comparison base (+24.0% in 1Q 2012). The Tequila portfolio registered a strong organic growth of +35.3%, driven by both Espolón and Cabo Wabo in the key U.S. market. Campari Soda declined by -28.3%, affected by so called article 62 and weak consumption trend and trading conditions in day bars channel and off trade in Italy. The Brazilian brands posted a good recovery in first quarter 2013, up +15.9%, thanks also to easy comps. GlenGrant registered a negative organic performance of-11.8%, as the positive performance in Germany, GTR and Japan was not able to offset weak performance in the core Italian market.

 

In terms of wines, which accounted for 13.1% of total sales, Cinzano vermouths registered an organic growth of +7.8%, driven by positive performances in Russia, Germany and Argentina. Cinzano sparkling wines sales registered a negative organic performance of -10.5%, driven by a strong performance of Russia, which was not able to compensate soft sales in Germany and Italy. Other sparkling wines (including Riccadonna, Odessa and Mondoro) grew organically by +49.9% driven by a strong trend of Mondoro in Russia, whilst still wines (mainly Sella&Mosca, Enrico Serafino and Teruzzi&Puthod) declined due to continued weakness in the Italian on premise channel.

 

In terms of soft drinks (5.3% of total sales), Crodino declined by -45.0% driven by destocking in connection with so called article 62 as well as weak trading conditions and consumption trend.

 

 

——

Davide Campari-Milano SpA: What matters: Growth still lags peers

 

Source: Barclays

May 14th

 

Stock Rating/Industry View: Underweight/Neutral

Price Target: EUR 5.70 (from EUR 6.00)

Price (10-May-2013): EUR 6.17

Potential Upside/Downside: -8%

Tickers: CPR IM / CPRI.MI

 

What to do – retain Underweight, as discount is likely to widen: Campari remains the worst performing Spirits stock in our universe YTD and we expect this trend to continue while trading remains uncertain in its key European markets. Further, cost constraints at the gross margin level and marketing investments to counter its top-line pressures will result in lower earnings generation compared to its peers. We expect Campari to report F13e top-line growth of +2%, with only flat organic earnings; behind its peers which we expect to generate high-single digit top- and bottom-line growth. Subsequently, given the lower relative growth potential and earnings certainty we expect the shares to trade at a discount to its Spirits peers, rather than its current 3% PE premium (C14e PE on 17x).

 

What’s next – short-term outlook remains challenged: With the Q1 delivery impacted by a ?25mn destock in Italy, due to the change in payment terms regulation, and continued competitor pressures for Aperol in Germany, the market’s focus will be on the company’s ability to recover the lost sales in Q2/Q3. However, with tight credit conditions for domestic wholesalers and poor weather impacting underlying consumption trends, management does not expect to recover the destock entirely in Q2. Further, to help recover the lost share in Germany, Campari will lift its marketing spend significantly, reducing any chance of a potential margin over-delivery in Q2.

 

What we learnt – Europe a significant drag: Campari’s Q1 result missed market expectations by 19% at the EBIT level. Organic Group sales fell -9% with large misses in Italy, Germany and Australia. 65% of Campari’s key brand portfolio reported negative sales trends, with Aperol, soft drinks, and surprisingly Wild Turkey, particularly weak. Italian organic sales fell 26%, given the wholesaler destock, with underlying consumption trends still down -4%. German sales fell -20% given the continued pressures on Aperol from cheaper imitation products and poor weather, while sales in Australia fell a disappointing -11% as competitors promoted heavily in the bourbon and RTD categories.

 

What’s changed – weak margin outlook: We have downgraded our F13e and 14e earnings by -8% to account for the soft Q1 result, and weaker full year margins due to a higher-than-expected organic marketing investment and a stronger volume deleverage impact on organic Group margins. We subsequently reduce our price target to ?5.70.

 

 

——

Vodka Maker’s Ch. 11 Plan OK’d Despite Shareholder Protest

 

Source: Law360

By Matt Chiappardi

May 13, 2013

 

A Delaware bankruptcy judge on Monday approved the Chapter 11 plan for vodka distributor Central European Distribution Corp. that slashes debt by $665 million but gives total control of the company to Russian billionaire Roustam Tariko over the objection of an Italian shareholder.

 

CEDC investor Eugenio Rainoldi will see his $3.3 million equity stake in the company wiped out with the confirmation and had argued that the process was somehow tainted with Tariko, who is also CEDC chairman and whose Roust Trading Ltd. already owns a 19.5 percent equity stake in the company, swooping in to take it over.

 

But U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Sontchi rejected that reasoning Monday, ruling that the Russian billionaire’s influence over the prepackaged plan was tempered by the independent committee that negotiated it.

 

“This process was beyond reproach,” Judge Sontchi said in court. “Given the business reality in the case, there is no question Mr. Tariko had some leverage in his negotiations, but the special committee neutralized the power that he had.”

 

The prepackaged plan for the CEDC – a New Jersey-based holding company that encompasses vodka distilleries and alcohol distribution operations in Poland, Russia and other Eastern European countries – slashes the company’s debt by $665 million, per the funding agreement by which Roust would inject $172 million of new money into the company, forgive a previous $50 million loan and get full control over the reorganized company.

 

But all of the shareholders’ equity claims are wiped out in the bankruptcy plan, something that did not sit well with Rainoldi.

 

He accused Tariko, whose firm has interests in premium vodka and spirits distribution, of taking advantage of the bankruptcy process just to assume full control of CEDC.

 

“This is an individual who bought a minority stake and wanted to take over,” Rainoldi’s attorney, Alec P. Ostrow of Becker Glynn Muffly Chassin & Hosinki LLP said in court Monday. “He wanted to get the benefit of an increase in value all for himself.”

 

Ostrow also took issue with the speed of the case, after CEDC filed for Chapter 11 protection on April 7, calling the process, “a rush to get the plan through on unsuspecting shareholders.”

 

Attorneys for CEDC countered Monday that the hurried pace was necessary because the company was set to run out of money for its Russian operations by July and would be forced to begin liquidating.

 

CEDC’s attorney Jay Goffman of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP also argued that after the company pays secured debtors holding bonds scheduled to mature in 2013 and 2016, all of whom will be receiving reduced recoveries, there just wasn’t enough money left over for shareholders.

 

In the plan, creditors holding the outstanding 2013 notes would receive $55 million, recovering only 35.4 percent of their investments. Those holding the $982 million in 2016 notes will see an estimated recovery of at least 83.7 percent, receiving $172 million in cash, $450 million in new secured notes and $200 million in new convertible notes, according to CEDC.

 

All of the restructuring transactions are expected to close by the end of the month, the company said in a statement Monday.

 

CEDC, which has its roots in Poland, fell on hard times almost as soon as it entered the Russian market in 2008, right before the global economic crisis and an initiative by the Russian government to impose excise taxes on alcohol to cut down on consumption.

 

The taxes drove up prices, forcing CEDC to deeply discount its inventory in order to retain customers, the company said.

 

Tariko said Monday that CEDC will emerge from bankruptcy a stronger firm.

 

“The court’s approval of our financial restructuring is a very positive step forward for the company,” he said. “The company’s world-class brands are now able to continue to build on their success locally and globally and perform as category leaders.”

 

CEDC is represented by Scott Simpson, Jay Goffman, Mark McDermott, Mark Chehi and Sarah Pierce of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP.

 

Rainoldi is represented by Alec P. Ostrow of Becker Glynn Muffly Chassin & Hosinski LLP and Joseph H. Huston of Stevens & Lee PC.

 

The case is In re: Central European Distribution Corp., case No. 1:13-bk-10738, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

 

 

——

Why AB InBev and Big Brewers Are Betting on Hard Cider

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Venessa Wong

May 13, 2013

 

For those who can’t get enough of that alcoholic apple juice we call hard cider, here comes more. On May 13, Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD) releases Stella Artois Cidre in the U.S., starting in 26 states. A nationwide rollout is planned for early next year. Cidre, pronounced cee-dra, first launched in the U.K. in 2011 and sold about 291,000 hectoliters (or about 247,980 U.S. barrels) at grocery and liquor stores there in the year ended March 30. The company hopes Americans’ budding love for cider will help Cidre take off in the U.S.

 

Why is cider seeing a revival in the U.S.? IBISWorld estimates that while brewers’ hard cider sales, which were $601.5 million in 2012, represent about 2 percent of total revenue, they’re growing rapidly. Sales increased an average 27.5 percent annually during the last five years. Such numbers don’t go unnoticed by big brewers: C&C Group acquired Vermont Hard Cider, MillerCoors bought Crispin, and Heineken added Strongbow to its portfolio.

 

Brewers say three main groups are driving demand: the young, craft beer crowd; the growing number of consumers avoiding gluten; and women.

 

Charles van Es, senior director of portfolio brands at Heineken USA, says the company’s cider buyers are largely 21- to 29-year-olds who are “adventurous with their beverage selection and drink more craft and upscale beer.” The craft beer boom has stirred up curiosity about life beyond Bud.

 

The perception that cider’s healthier should not be underestimated. Says Agata Kaczanowska, an analyst at IBISWorld: “At the core of the movement toward hard cider is the health consciousness of Americans. It is fruit-based, so people associate it with a more positive nutritional value.” The gluten-free food movement has given cider a boost, too, because the beverage is naturally gluten free. NPD found that 30 percent of adults claimed to cut down on or avoid gluten completely in January.

 

As for female consumers, “just like in the white wine category, they are very important,” says Rick Oleshak, director of Stella Artois in the U.S. “There’s probably more of a female opportunity within the cider category than there is within a high-end European beer.”

 

Rather than being pitched as an alternative to beer, Cidre, which claims to be drier than typical American ciders, will be marketed in the U.S. as an alternative to white wine. AB InBev’s only cider product in the U.S. until now was Michelob Ultra Light Cider, which launched in 2012 and currently represents 6.6 percent of the U.S. cider market. “We’re trying to reshape the category,” says Oleshak. “The opportunity is now.”

 

Cider sales are expected to grow in the next few years, Kaczanowska says, yet it’s difficult to tell if the beverage will be a passing fad. Still, she notes, the distribution power of AB InBev, MillerCoors, and Heineken can only help get it in front of more drinkers.

 

 

——

Vijay Mallya’s United Breweries, United Spirits get Rs 91 crore service tax notice

 

Source: Press Trust of India

May 13 2013

 

Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence (DGCEI) has issued a show-cause-cum-demand notices to Vijay Mallya-owned firms United Breweries and United Spirits Ltd, for allegedly evading service tax of Rs 91 crore.

 

“Both the firms have evaded the service tax on sponsoring various shows and sports events,” a senior DGCEI official said.

 

The notice is pertaining to sponsoring events like the Indian Premier League, East Bengal Football Team, Force India Team, Wills India Fashion Week, Mohan Bagan Team.

 

The notice issued to United Breweries is for the amount of Rs 21.7 crore, while that to United Spirit is of Rs 69.3 crore.

 

According to the officials, a DGCEI team had recently visited the Bangalore offices of both the firms.

 

Officials said that if the amount was not paid within a month, penalty of 25 per cent would be imposed on the total amount.

 

Meanwhile, United Spirits in its statement to PTI said that the DGCEI Mumbai has asked them to furnish the soft copy of the ledger extract of Advertisement & Sales Promotion expenses for the period 2007 – 08 to 2011 – 12.

 

“DGCEI has, without verifying the nature of the expenses accounted for in the ledger extract, considered the entire amount as ‘sponsorship services’ and have served the show cause notice on 23/4/13 for Rs.69.3 crore”, the statement said.

 

The company said that it was in the process of replying to the show cause notices by highlighting the “error”.

 

While United Breweries in its statement to PTI said that, “DGCEI Mumbai has issued show cause cum demand notices on various sponsorship payments like IPL, Force India, United East Bengal Football Team, etc for payments totalling to Rs.21.7 crore covering the period from Oct ’07 to Mar ’12, ignoring payment of service taxes already paid till date”.

 

The statement added that UB has been regular in paying service tax wherever applicable and they are in the process of filing replies and explanations shortly.

 

 

——

GuestMetrics: Beer prices on the rise.though higher Craft beer prices driven by growing popularity of the more expensive Craft brands

 

Source: GuestMetrics

May 13th

 

According to GuestMetrics, the overall average price for beer in full service restaurants and bars accelerated during the first quarter of 2013, though higher average prices in the Craft beer segment was driven by more expensive craft beers becoming increasingly popular among consumers.  

 

“While beer’s price/mix was up +3.2% during 2012 compared to the prior year, that accelerated to +3.6% during the first quarter of 2013,” said Bill Pecoriello, CEO of GuestMetrics LLC.  “Looking specifically at the Craft beer segment, its price/mix was up +3.5% in 2012 and accelerated to +3.8% during the first quarter of 2013.  Additionally, looking at pricing in absolute terms, while Craft and Imports were generally at parity in 2011, the gap widened in 2012 as the price of Craft increased faster than that of Imports, and widened even further during the first quarter of 2013.  However, in analyzing the various price tiers within Craft, our analysis indicates that the increase in average prices was primarily the result of a mix effect as consumers increasingly chose more expensive Craft beers,” continued Pecoriello.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, the average Craft price was $5.42 vs. Import of $5.39 in 2011 for a 3-cent delta, Craft was $5.59 vs. Import of $5.52 in 2012 for a 7-cent delta, and during 1Q13, Craft was $5.72 vs. Import of $5.62 for a 10-cent delta.

 

“As we wrote about earlier in the year, the majority of growth among Craft beers in 2011 and 2012 was driven by the more expensive price tiers within Craft beers, and during 1Q13, this trend continued at an accelerated rate,” said Peter Reidhead, VP of Strategy and Insights at GuestMetrics. “Based on our data, while the most expensive brands within Craft, which we call Tier #1, accounted for 15% of Craft beers sold in 2011, that increased to 22% in 2012, and was 29% during the first quarter of 2013.  However, while there was a fairly dramatic trade-up taking place within Crafts, the average price paid within each of the four price tiers has remained largely unchanged over the past nine quarters.  Therefore, the increase in Craft price from $5.42 in 2011 to $5.59 in 2012 to $5.72 in 1Q13 was due almost exclusively to mix effect as consumers traded up to more expensive brands.”

 

“Given the rapid shifts taking place in on-premise and the beer category in particular, we believe this is a perfect example of why operators and suppliers need to have an up-to-date understanding of the changes taking place in consumer preferences,” said Brian Barrett, President of GuestMetrics.  Based on data from GuestMetrics, looking at the y/y growth of price/mix in 2012 and 1Q13 compared to their respective prior year periods, Premium Light price/mix accelerated from +2.2% to +3.2%, Premium Plus from +2.4% to +3.4%, and Premium Regular from +0.9% to +1.4%.       

 

 

——

SAM: Minding Our Ks and Qs: Our Read of SAM’s Fiscal 1Q13 10-Q

 

Source: CITI

May 13th

 

SAM Tidbits – In their 1Q13 10-Q, published May 1, 2013, SAM provided information and forecasts related to its capital expenditures, purchase commitments, litigious developments, income tax audits, and capital lease requirements.

 

FCF Decreased Owing to Operating Cash Flow Usage – SAM generated negative free cash flow of $34.0 million in 1Q13, vs. the negative $13.2 million in free cash flow generated in 1Q12. The difference is attributable to the usage of operating cash flow in the current year (vs. OCF generation in 1Q12) and also to an increase in capital expenditures in 1Q13.

 

Investing Cash Flow Usage Increased – SAM used $21.1 million on investing activities in 1Q13, compared to the $15.0 million used on investing activities in the year-ago period (owing primarily to increased capital expenditures in the current year).

 

Financing Cash Flow Usage Increased – SAM used $8.2 million on financing activities in 1Q13 vs. $2.0 million generated in the year-ago period, a difference we attribute to an $11.0 million increase in share repurchases in the current year.

 

Conclusion – While we very much like much like SAM’s notable exposure to (and share of) the U.S. craft beer segment as well as the company’s expansion and success in new categories such as cider, we believe the company’s shares are fully-valued given that they are currently trading at roughly 25.5x our FY14 EPS estimate. As such, we maintain our $158 target price and Neutral rating on SAM.

 

 

——

This Map Shows Just How Much Your State Taxes the Beer You Drink

 

Source: Benzinga

Alex Biles, Benzinga Staff Writer

May 13, 2013

 

The Tax Foundation rolled out a new map last week looking at state excise tax rates on beer.

 

High tax rates are likely to affect major brewers like Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD [FREE Stock Trend Analysis]) and Molson Coors (NYSE: TAP) than craft brewers, whose already high prices have drawn in a faithful who are willing to pay a premium.

 

The state with the lowest excise tax rate was Wyoming at $0.02, while Tennessee taxed beer the most at $1.17. How much does your state tax beer? Check out the map below (click to enlarge):

 

Read more: http://www.benzinga.com/general/politics/13/05/3580101/this-map-shows-just-how-much-your-state-taxes-the-beer-you-drink#ixzz2TFuyLya0

 

 

——

Woodford Reserve-themed room planned at Fort Knox

 

Source: Business First

David A. Mann

May 13th

 

Officials at Louisville-based Brown-Forman Corp. plan to celebrate the opening of a Woodford Reserve Room at The Saber and Quill Club at Fort Knox on Wednesday.

 

It will be the first-of-its-kind branded room on a military post, according to a media advisory for the event.

 

The room will feature bourbon barrels around and above a bar as well as images from the Woodford Reserve Distillery, the advisory said. The hope is, with the many troops who come through Fort Knox as a duty station or for training, that they will take away a little piece of bourbon country and the Woodford Reserve brand with them.

 

Joe Bollinger, director of military and transportation for Brown-Forman is among speakers at the event, which will also include a ribbon cutting for the room.

 

 

——

The CDC Goes To War Against Wine (Excerpt)

 

Source: Forbes

May 13th

 

The May 2 editorial in Pennsylvania’s Scranton Times Tribune, said it all: “Perdition just a vote away.” The plan by Governor Tom Corbett to end the state’s monopoly on wine and spirits sales has triggered hellish prognostications from a constellation of groups who argue that the best way to prevent alcohol abuse is to have the government sell it reluctantly.

 

“This reckless scheme will put alcohol on every street corner and increase crime,” said a million-dollar ad campaign paid for by the United Food & Commercial Workers,” a union with 3,000 members at risk of losing their monopoly.

 

“I’m a clinician, not a politician, and I don’t think we should privatize because I think it will work – there will be an increase in alcohol sales,” Deb Beck, the president of the Drug and Alcohol Service Providers of Pennsylvania, ” said at a Senate hearing on the bill (as reported by the Philadelphia Inquirer). “And why in the world,” she continued, “would we want to increase access to something that causes so many problems?

 

http://www.forbes.com/sites/trevorbutterworth/2013/05/13/the-cdc-goes-to-war-against-wine/

 

 

——

LAURENT-PERRIER (=) . VRANKEN POMMERY (-)

 

Source: Exane BNP

May 13th

 

The bubble monitor – Self-inflicted pain?

 

LAURENT-PERRIER (=) TP: EUR69 . Upside: 5%

Beverages (-) . France . Price (09 May. 13): EUR65.6

 

VRANKEN POMMERY (-) TP: EUR18 . Downside: 13%

Beverages (-) . France . Price (09 May. 13): EUR20.7

 

Champagne shipments down 12% in March against a very easy comp

At Q1 sales release, Vranken-Pommery indicated that March had been a weak month for the champagne market. Indeed. Global champagne shipments declined 12% in March, the worst monthly performance since March last year, when volumes already sunk 16%.

 

Unsurprising yet worrying deterioration in France (-17% y/y)

Shipments to France were down 17%, the second worst monthly decline since Feb 2009. Whilst we acknowledge the volatility of monthly data, we cannot help but notice that the volume decline at champagne houses is even worse (-23%, one of the worst performances ever).

 

Self-inflicted pain or competitive pressure from cooperatives?

We believe that part of the volume decline from champagne houses in France is a necessary self-inflicting pain as the likes of Vranken-Pommery end their non-profitable distribution contracts (essentially in the off-trade). It is hard however to disaggregate this voluntary volume loss from the underlying weakness of demand. Our channel checks suggested price rises of 1-2% in March vs. February at the retail level in France for Pommery and Laurent-Perrier. This could potentially explain why cooperatives are gaining share (volumes up 16% in Q1 in France vs. -14% for champagne houses.) We shall know in the coming months.

 

Risk rises with French exposure; stay away from champagne for now

With France accounting for 52% and 23% of Vranken and Laurent-Perrier sales respectively, our relative preference still goes to Laurent-Perrier (Neutral) vs. Vranken-Pommery (Underperform) given its higher exposure to non-European markets. However, we believe a continuation of these very weak trends in France could potentially lead to consensus cuts for both companies. With Vranken-Pommery and Laurent-Perrier trading on 19.4x and 17.4x CY13e earnings, we clearly see better opportunities elsewhere in the sector.

 

 

——

South Africa Wine Exports Setting Records on China Demand

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Guy Collins

May 13, 2013

 

South African wine exports are poised to beat their 2012 record this year following high yields and on demand for premium vintages from North America and Asia, industry executives and growers said.

 

Wine exports rose to 469 million liters (124 million U.S. gallons) in the year ending April 30, up 25 percent from the previous 12 months and more than triple the total shipped in 2000, data from the Wines of South Africa trade body, or WOSA, show. Bulk shipments rose 53 percent while those of bottled and packaged wines fell 5 percent, as large producers bottled more in export markets.

 

Although wine has been grown in South Africa since Dutch settlers arrived in the 17th century, the country was cut off from trade during the apartheid era of racial discrimination, which ended in 1994 with the first all-race elections. Two decades on, exporters are seeking to consolidate in established markets such as the U.K. and Germany while boosting sales in Asia and Africa.

 

“If you think about South Africa’s history, we’ve been making wine for 350 years but it’s only really since 1994 that we’ve actively pursued the export market, that we’ve been welcome and accepted,” Johan Erasmus, general manager of the Glen Carlou winery in the Paarl Valley north east of Cape Town, said at a London tasting in March. “We are much more in touch with consumers worldwide.”

 

A wet winter meant plenty of underground water, helping to boost yields in 2013, according to Su Birch, Chief Executive Officer at WOSA. Yields at the 2012 harvest rose to 14.13 metric tons per hectare (2.471 acres), the highest for at least six years, and probably climbed to about 14.90 tons this year, according to estimates based on preliminary data from WOSA.

Export Outlook

 

WOSA’s September forecast was for wine exports this year of between 430 million and 440 million liters, after a record 409 million in 2012. A combination of high yields, more marketing in the U.S. and elsewhere and global demand for bulk wine means that’s already looking too low. “It depends what the rand does,” Birch said by phone from Stellenbosch last month, predicting full-year exports of about 460 million liters.

 

The currency is near a four-year low against the dollar, helping exporters. It has weakened 7.1 percent this year, the most among 245 major emerging-market currencies tracked by Bloomberg. Leading export brands include First Cape, Kumala and Distell Group Ltd. (DST)’s Fleur du Cap.

 

Premium Market

 

Still, costs in South Africa are rising. The government boosted the minimum wage for farmworkers by 52 percent to 105 rand ($11.51) a day from March 1 after strikes in wine-growing areas in the Western Cape province began in November and turned violent, prompting the police to respond with tear gas, stun grenades and water cannons. Some vineyards were torched.

 

In the premium market, defined by WOSA as wines above $10 a bottle, a shift by growers to more Cabernet Sauvignon, Shiraz and other international grapes following the end of apartheid and to proportionately less Chenin Blanc, a French varietal popular in South Africa, has helped boost brand appeal.

 

The proportion of vineyards planted with Cabernet Sauvignon, a classic Bordeaux grape, tripled to 12 percent in 2011, the latest year for which figures were available, from 4 percent in 1990, according to WOSA.

 

Sauvignon Blanc climbed to 10 percent from 4 percent while Shiraz, also known as Syrah and associated with France’s Rhone Valley, rose to 10 percent from 1 percent and Merlot jumped to 6 percent, also from 1 percent. Pinotage, a hybrid between pinot noir and cinsaut developed locally, has also increased its plantings, although outpaced by Shiraz and Chardonnay.

 

Producers growing international grapes include Glen Carlou, a 28-year-old winery owned by Swiss-based Hess Family Estates, whose range includes Pinot Noir, Shiraz and Cabernet Sauvignon.

 

Bordeaux Varietals

 

Oldenburg Vineyards in Stellenbosch grows Bordeaux varietals Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc and Merlot as well as Syrah, Chardonnay and Chenin Blanc.

 

“It’s not so much a yield game, it’s more a quality game,” said Oldenburg’s owner Adrian Vanderspuy while visiting London in March. “We aim to be at the premium end.”

 

Even as Europe remains South Africa’s biggest export destination, with between 60 percent and 70 percent of sales, Vanderspuy said the market on both sides of the Atlantic is changing amid demand for higher-quality wines.

 

“We’re not necessarily going for the supermarkets” in the U.S., Vanderspuy said. “The whole category of South Africa is growing. Our first shipment of wine has just gone to Shanghai.”

Shelf Space

 

The U.K. took the biggest share of South Africa’s wine exports last year with 22 percent and Germany was second with 19 percent, according to WOSA. While shipments of South African bottled wine to the U.K. and the U.S. fell in the five years to 2011, they rose sixfold to 4.28 million bottles in China and almost tripled to 3.44 million in Nigeria.

 

With exports rising, South Africa is still battling for shelf space. Its share of wines imported into the U.S. was 1.2 percent last year, down from about 8 percent in the 1990s, according to the San Francisco-based Wine Institute and George Monyemangene, South Africa’s consul-general in New York.

 

In August Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, started selling South African wines in the U.S. after spending $1.8 billion in 2011 buying 51 percent of Johannesburg-based Massmart Holdings Ltd. (MSM), Africa’s biggest food and goods wholesaler.

 

Not all wineries plant just classic French grapes, even if they are aiming for foreign markets. At Da Capo Vineyards in Stellenbosch, founded by Milan-born Alberto Bottega in 1998, his son Roberto said Italian varieties Nebbiolo, San Giovese and Barbera grow alongside Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot.

 

“South Africa is in a unique position,” Bottega, who promotes his father’s estate, said at a London tasting. “Our wines are somewhere between the old world and the new.”

 

 

——

Markets respond to ‘stunning’ 2011 Ports

 

Source: the drinks business

by Gabriel Savage

13th May, 2013

 

Port producers are reporting significant demand from markets worldwide in the wake of their superlative-fuelled 2011 vintage declarations.

 

Just two weeks since his company declared its 2011s and with the main US push not due to start until next month, Adrian Bridge, CEO of The Fladgate Partnership, confirmed: “Around the world there is strong interest.”

 

In addition to healthy demand from established markets, Bridge highlighted recent efforts to reach new customers. “Our own company opened up five new markets in South America last year,” he told attendees of a 2011 vintage Port tasting organised in London by the Institute of Masters of Wine.

 

Explaining the reason for this healthy interest in the 2011 declarations, he told the drinks business: “It’s a convergence of factors: a great vintage at a time when Bordeaux is selling 2012 en primeurs that are perhaps not as exciting as previous years. So you’re looking at lacklustre Bordeaux versus something stunning come out of the Douro.”

 

Meanwhile Christian Seely, managing director of AXA Millésimes, who manages both Quinta do Noval – which finally declared yesterday, including the first Nacional declaration since 2003 – and his own property Quinta da Romaneira, stressed the enormous value offered by Vintage Port.

 

“The best ones are equivalent to premier cru Bordeaux,” he told db. “It’s such an absurd steal that it doesn’t matter so much what the rest of the fine market’s like at the moment.”

 

However, Seely predicted that the market could soon wake up to this value. “It could easily be about to change,” he observed. “The sharpest investors don’t always look back but ahead. With the expanding world wine market, the big names like Bordeaux are the first thing to be discovered but eventually people discover more exotic aspects of the wine world.”

 

For Bridge, the quality and accompanying high profile of 2011 looks set to highlight not just the value of this vintage, but also older Ports on the market.

 

“I’d like to think there’ll be some price appreciation on this vintage, but it’s sure to put the spotlight on previous years,” he commented. “People will see that Taylors 2011 is £60 but £75 gets you Taylor’s ’85. We will see a reflection onto previous vintages.”

 

However, with prices for the 2011 vintage only slightly higher than Fladgate’s last declaration of 2009, Bridge stressed a desire to avoid the inflation that has affected Bordeaux in recent years.

 

“Vintage Port is the icing on the cake,” he acknowledged of the category’s relatively minor role in both collectors’ cellars and Fladgate’s own sales figures. “We could charge more but we’re very conscious that our main business is the LBV and other styles.”

 

However, he noted: “We do like to leave something for the consumer – the difficulty for Bordeaux is that it’s sucked out every bit of cash in the system so the end consumer might not see much price appreciation.”

 

 

——

Quinta do Noval latest house to declare 2011 vintage

 

Source: Harpers

Written by Chris Mercer   

Tuesday, 14 May 2013

 

Quinta do Noval has added its name to the plethora of port producers declaring a vintage for 2011.

 

Alongside declaring its 2011 ‘classic’ Noval vintage, Quinta do Noval has also taken the rare step of declaring its Nacional Vintage, something it has not done since 2003.

 

Over the past month, the much-vaunted 2011 vintage has been widely declared by major Port houses, many of which believe the year could be the best for a generation.

 

“Immediately after the foot treading in the lagares that September, we knew we were in the presence of what could be a great vintage year,” said Quinta do Noval managing director Christian Seely.

 

“The 2011 wines – many made from our replanted sites, now well into maturity – showed excellent aromas, with the true deep rich colour we look for in a wine with magnificent ageing potential,” he said.

 

It was not always so clear that 2011 would turn out well, however. The group said erratic weather through spring and summer, including a prolonged dry

spell in the final weeks before harvest, caused uncertainty among the winemaking team until the very last moments.

 

 

——

Chateau La Fleur Jonquet sold to Chinese architect

 

Source: Decanter

by Chris Mercer

Monday 13 May 2013

Chinese architect Wengcheng Li has acquired Chateau La Fleur Jonquet in Graves.

 

La Fleur Jonquet will become Li’s third wine property in Bordeaux, where he already owns Chateau La Dominante, in Saint–Denis de Pile and Chateau Lucas in Castillon-la-Bataille.

 

The deal for the nine-hectare Fleur Jonquet, a family business based in Arbanats and Portets, is another example of Chinese investors moving into Bordeaux wine production.   

 

‘Everything will continue as before,’ Fleur Jonquet cellarmaster Eric Jouin told Decanter.com, adding that he and others will remain in their posts.

 

La Fleur Jonquet’s winemaker and newly ex-owner, Laurence Lataste, could not be immediately reached for comment. However, she was quoted as telling the Sud Ouest newspaper that she decided to sell because none of her three children wanted to take the Chateau on.

 

She added that the chateau exports 75% of its annual production, which is around 50,000 bottles.

 

A third generation winemaker, Lataste founded the chateau in 1986, originally calling it Junquet. It has vines more than 80 years old, some of the oldest in Graves.

 

 

——

Bordeaux 2012: Smith Haut-Lafitte, Pichon Baron drop 10% on 2011

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Monday 13 May 2013

 

Smith Haut-Lafitte and Pichon Baron head a fresh flurry of Bordeaux 2012 wine releases, as this year’s campaign continues to lack vigour.

 

After a pause for French bank holidays, the Bordeaux 2012 campaign has restarted with a few high profile chateaux bringing the total number of released prices to nearly 70% of the expected total.

 

Chateau Smith Haut-Lafitte brought its red wine out at a drop of 10.53% on last year, to ?40.80 ex-Bordeaux, while keeping its white wine unchanged at ?57.50.

 

Chateau Pichon Baron de Longueville and Chateau Clos Fourtet both saw a similar discount, down by 10% to ?65 and ?45 respectively ex-Bordeaux.

 

Chateau Calon Ségur dropped by just 3% to ?38.40, but after a significant fall in 2011 from ?57.60 in 2010. The estate is under new ownership this year, with a small investment from the Moueix family of Pétrus, and is reported to have sold out quickly.

 

‘Calon is always a strong brand,’ one courtier told Decanter.com, ‘and it has been one of the few wines this year that sold through immediately upon release.

 

‘Pichon Baron, in contrast, has not been so well received. It’s more expensive than other comparable vintages on the market, such as the 2006, and almost the same price as the 2011. It’s not helping what is an already difficult campaign.’

 

Several smaller estates have also released at the start of this week, including: Pedesclaux at ?19.20 ex-Bordeaux, down 5.88%; Fayat at ?16.5, down 1.44%; Capbern Gasqueton at ?10.8, down 4.26%; and Clos Puy Arnaud at ?13.50 down 1.74%.

 

 

——

Rupert Murdoch buys Moraga Vineyards estate in Bel Air

 

Source: LA Times

By Meg James

May 10, 2013

 

Rupert Murdoch has just popped the cork on a deal to buy a rare trophy property in Los Angeles: the 16-acre Moraga Vineyards estate, located in the hills above Bel Air.

 

The billionaire media mogul announced his purchase on Twitter on Friday afternoon: “About to celebrate buying beautiful small vineyard right in LA. Great wine, Moraga, owned by great Angelino, Tom Jones, Time cover, 1961!”

 

Murdoch did not reveal the purchase price.

 

The listing price for the Santa Monica Mountains property, which can be glimpsed from the 405 Freeway, was just a tasteful sip below $30 million, according to The Times’ Daily Dish blog.

 

Jim Kline, the listing agent with Surterre Properties of Newport Beach, declined to comment on the sale when reached Friday night. Kline confirmed the listing price was $29.5 million.

 

The Hollywood Reporter first reported in February that Murdoch was sniffing around the property after reading about the vineyard in one of his company’s properties, the Wall Street Journal.

 

A spokesperson for Murdoch declined to comment Friday.

 

According to the winery’s website, Moraga was the first commercial winery to be bonded in the city of Los Angeles after Prohibition ended in 1933.

 

In the 1930s and 1940s, the property was a horse ranch owned by Victor Fleming, the director of such Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer classics as “Gone With the Wind” and “The Wizard of Oz.” Fleming began developing the property in 1937 and completed it in 1940 after finishing “The Wizard of Oz.”

 

Such Hollywood luminaries as Clark Gable, Vivian Leigh, Ingmar Bergman and Spencer Tracy were frequently invited to the estate.

 

Tom Jones, the most recent property owner, is former chief executive of the Northrop Corp., a position he held for 30 years. He was featured on the cover of an issue of Time magazine 52 years ago.

 

Jones and his wife, Ruth, bought the 16-acre property in 1959. They have lived there since then.

 

Elevation of the vineyard, which sits five miles from the Pacific Ocean, is 600 to 900 feet. Annual rainfall is 24 inches, compared with 15 inches in downtown Los Angeles.

 

When Jones learned Moraga Canyon had deep gravel soil, he was intrigued enough to try growing some Bordeaux varietals on his land – Cabernet, Merlot, Petit Verdot, Cabernet Franc and Sauvignon Blanc.

 

Moraga wines are sold in some of Los Angeles’ toniest restaurants, including the Bel Air Country Club, the Beverly Hills Hotel, Patina, Spago, and Morton’s Steakhouse.

 

According to Forbes magazine, Murdoch’s net worth is estimated at $11.2 billion.

 

 

——

Restaurant sales hit record high in April

 

Source: NRA

May 13, 2013

 

In his latest commentary, the National Restaurant Association’s Chief Economist Bruce Grindy reports on April sales and some new consumer survey data.  Restaurant sales bounced back from a dampened first quarter to hit a new record high in April.  Meanwhile, consumers’ pent-up demand for restaurants remains historically high, which suggests they will be ready to ramp up spending even more when their financial situation improves.

 

Restaurant sales hit a new record high in April, according to preliminary figures from the U.S. Census Bureau.  Eating and drinking place sales totaled $45.9 billion in April on a seasonally-adjusted basis, up 0.8 percent from March and approximately $200 million above the previous high registered in December 2012.

 

After totaling nearly $45.7 billion in December, eating and drinking place sales were dampened somewhat during the first three months of 2013, likely due in part to the impact of the payroll tax hike.  On a cumulative basis, eating and drinking place sales in the first quarter were roughly $850 million short of December’s baseline level.

 

While spending appears to have generally bounced back from the first quarter’s downtick, new NRA survey data shows the potential is there for even more improvements in the months ahead.  In a national survey of 1,000 adults conducted April 25-28 for the NRA by ORC International, consumers were asked if they are using restaurants as often as they would like.

 

The answer was a resounding no, with 49 percent of adults reporting they are not eating on the premises of restaurants as frequently as they would like.  This indicator of pent-up demand was even more pronounced among middle-aged consumers, with 59 percent of 35-to-44-year olds and 54 percent of 45-to-54-year olds saying they aren’t eating out as often as they would like.  Women (54 percent) were more likely than men (44 percent) to say they would like to dine out more often.

 

The story is similar for the off-premises market, with 51 percent of adults saying they are not purchasing take-out or delivery as often as they would like.  Like the on-premises responses, women (55 percent) were more likely than men (46 percent) to say they would like to be utilizing take-out and delivery options more frequently.

 

These new survey results suggest that once consumers are feeling more confident about their personal financial situation, they will be primed to burn off some of their accumulated pent-up demand for restaurants.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Pa. senators to hear from beer, liquor sellers

 

Source: ABC 27

Posted: May 14, 2013

 

State senators will continue exploring the liberalization of Pennsylvania’s wine, beer and liquor laws in a second hearing that’ll focus on groups that make and sell alcoholic beverages.

 

The Senate hearing Tuesday afternoon is the second of 3 planned hearings, as Gov. Tom Corbett pushes his fellow Republicans who control the Legislature to expand the sale of alcohol to more outlets.

 

A bill passed the House in March that would create 1,200 new private wine and liquor store licenses and allow thousands of bars, restaurants and grocery stores to begin selling bottles of wine.

 

Among the people testifying in front of the Senate Law and Justice Committee are expected to be representatives of beer distributors, bars, restaurants, wineries and more. Corbett wants a bill on his desk by July 1.

 

 

——

Virginia: Wine distributor uncorks expansion plan

 

Source: Richmond Biz Sense

David Larter

May 10, 2013

 

Hanover County is about to catch a wine buzz.

 

Wine distributor Republic National Distributing Company will build a 200,000-plus-square-foot facility in Ashland off Elletts Crossing Road, near the new Vitamin Shoppe warehouse center.

 

Republic National President Tom Cole confirmed the move Thursday.

 

“We’re very happy to be expanding our presence in Virginia,” Cole said.

 

Gary Archuleta, executive vice president with Republic National, said that the distribution center is in the design phase but that it will be more than 200,000 square feet with room for expansion.

 

“We are acquiring the land, and right now we are in the due diligence process,” he said.

 

The center is being developed by an internal group at the company, Archuleta said.

 

He said he could not give an accurate cost of development because the project has yet to be bid out.

 

Republic National currently occupies a 160,000-square-foot space in Sandston at 5401 Eubank Road. The company has about 300 employees in the area. It does not plan to immediately add jobs related to the move but will as needed over time, Archuleta said.

 

The company primarily distributes wine and sells about 3 million cases per year, Archuleta said. (That’s 36 million bottles of wine)

 

Republic National distributes dozens of brands, including such household names as Sutter Home, Woodbridge, Black Box, Little Penguin and Franzia.

 

“We’ve had several successful years back to back,” Archuleta said. “We’re in a position now where we have to expand in order to maintain the current volume we have.”

 

The 22-acre parcel of land is directly south of the Vitamin Shoppe parcel and is currently owned by Virginia Truck Center of Richmond, according to Hanover County records. BizSense was unable to reach anyone at Virginia Truck Center for comment.

 

The site is near the split of Washington Highway and Elletts Crossing Road and is visible from Interstate 95. It was most recently assessed at about $960,000, according to county records.

 

Hanover County Economic Development Director Edwin Gaskin said via email that he could not comment, citing a confidentiality agreement.

 

According to Archuleta, the company has been in Virginia since March 1997.

 

Its neighbor Vitamin Shoppe’s 300,000-square-foot distribution center, which is under construction and will add 170 jobs to the county.

 

The Republic National news is the latest in a string of big announcements for Hanover County.

 

The state’s Department of Game and Inland Fisheries is building its new headquarters there. And plans are in place for a 392,000-square-foot outlet mall developed by California-based Craig Realty Group.

 

 

——

Turkey: Turkey considers tighter limits on alcohol sale and consumption

 

Source: Reuters

By Humeyra Pamuk

Mon, May 13 2013

 

The Turkish government has prepared a draft law that would ban advertising alcoholic drinks in what officials say is an effort to protect children but could further divide religious and secularist Turks.

 

The bill, which was sent to parliament on Friday, would also ban companies that produce alcohol from sponsoring events, restrict where alcoholic drinks are sold and consumed, and require Turkish producers to place health warnings on packaging.

 

“Our aim is to protect society, particularly children and youth from taking up these habits at an early age, and not to limit an adult’s alcohol consumption,” Yahya Akman, a lawmaker in the ruling AK Party and one of the draft’s signatorees, told Reuters on Monday.

 

The move was made only weeks after the conservative prime minister, Tayyip Erdogan, who is known for his dislike of alcohol, declared ayran, a non-alcoholic, yogurt refreshment as the national drink.

 

It follows a ban on drinks service on several routes flown by state-run Turkish Airlines.

 

Islam prohibits the consumption of alcohol. Although Turkey’s population is 99 percent Muslim, it has a secular constitution. It belongs to NATO and is a candidate for European Union membership.

 

Many secularist-minded Turks fear tighter rules on drinking could undermine the separation of state and religion.

 

The bill, expected to become a law before parliament recesses in July, would bar venues that allow the sale and consumption of alcohol from openly displaying the products to people outside.

 

The government says it is not attempting to interfere in people’s lives and is trying to bring Turkey up to European norms by controlling alcohol sales and protecting the younger generation as it negotiates to enter the EU.

 

“This is to make sure that alcohol consumption is not encouraged among young people. The state has a responsibility to protect the family and the public,” Akman said.

 

Passage of the law would also be another blow to local brewers that are already grappling with taxes that are more than 100 percent on alcohol, one of the highest in the world.

 

Akman said public health is a higher priority than companies’ revenues.

 

“A company’s profit is insignificant when compared with the health of the general public, which is what’s at stake here.”

Fruit Day vs. Root Days: Wine Tasting by the Lunar Calendar

April 17, 2013

http://winefolly.com/update/biodynamic-calendar-fruit-day-wine-tasting/

Great Article On Lunar Calandar And Wine Drinking. Did You Know? We Schedule All Our Wine Tastings Using The Biodynamic Calendar. Today Is A FLOWER Day. Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

April 17, 2013

http://winefolly.com/update/biodynamic-calendar-fruit-day-wine-tasting/

Liquor Industry News 4-17-13

April 17, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Wednesday April 17th 2013

World Malbec Day

Biodynamic FLOWER Day Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

 

Beverages: Keeping an Eye on CPI

 

Source: CITI

Apr 16th

 

Alcoholic Beverage Prices Were Up Again – The CPI for Alcoholic Beverages (Off-Premise) increased 1.1% in March, showing a sequential acceleration compared to the prior month (+0.8%). The CPI for Alcoholic Beverages (On-Premise) increased 2.6% this month, slightly up from the 2.3% increase seen in the previous month. The CPI for Beer (Off-Premise) increased 1.0% this month, in line with the 1.0% increase seen in the prior month. The CPI for Spirits (Off-Premise) was up 1.5% this month, above the 0.3% change seen in February. The CPI for Wine (Off-Premise) increased 0.9% in March, above the 0.7% increase seen in February.

 

 

——

China’s Fake Alcohol

 

Its black market in fake alcohol is a health risk and costly to legitimate restaurants and bars.

 

Source: The National Review

By Jillian Kay Melchior

Apr 16th

 

Two days before Christmas, Chinese authorities led a raid in the capital city. Their findings would be shocking, had it been anywhere but China: 37,000 bottles of counterfeit alcohol, destined for Bar Street in Sanlitun, a popular drinking hub for expats in Beijing.

 

A gang of counterfeiters had apparently been collecting empty bottles of genuine alcohol, refilling them with a cheap substitute from who knows where, and then reselling them to bars. The police arrested a handful of people, but expats suspected the bar owners had been complicit, too – how else could they afford to offer their famously strong “10 kuai drinks” (U.S. $1.61)?

 

China is notorious for forgeries and counterfeits. Earlier this year, the China Bee Products Association claimed that half of all honey sold in the mainland is fake. Kunming in Yunnan Province brims with artificial Apple shops, converted overnight to “Smart Stores” throughout the duration of government campaigns to stamp out intellectual-property violations. Before the final Harry Potter book was released in 2007, J. K. Rowling knockoffs, including Harry Potter and the Crystal Vase and Harry Potter and Leopard Walk Up to Dragon, made their way to Chinese bookstores, as CBS reported.

 

Shops at the Beijing Silk Market hawk everything from fake Adidas to fake Gucci. And near Drum Tower, I once saw a gift shop selling a suitcase full of phony American hundred-dollar bills.

 

Alcohol is yet another item that’s frequently counterfeited. Joe Passanante, an American doctor based in Beijing, tells me that “from what I’ve seen clinically, [counterfeit alcohol] seems to be a widespread problem,” adding that “being a physician, I think it’s personally happened to me.”

 

Like melamine-tainted milk and counterfeit pharmaceuticals, China’s fake alcohol can carry significant health risks. Sometimes, it’s merely an inferior alcohol – think two-buck Chuck – being substituted and sold as a pricier one. But counterfeiters also use chemically distinct alcohol that’s dangerous if consumed. It’s generally made from one of three bases: ethylene glycol, which is essentially antifreeze, attacks the kidneys and heart and is potentially fatal; methanol, which attacks the retinal nerve and can result in blindness; and isopropyl alcohol, more commonly known as rubbing alcohol.

 

Passanante says that from what he’s seen, he suspects most of the counterfeit alcohol in Beijing is isopropyl alcohol – though “we never know. There’s no specific test for it. . . . If it doesn’t kill you the night you drink it, most people will be fine.” The clearest indications are a slightly fruity breath smell and a crippling hangover the next morning, Passanante says.

 

As little as 250 milliliters – just over a cup – of isopropyl alcohol causes heavy intoxication and can reportedly be fatal, though people have survived after drinking much more. Passing out, imbibers can enter a coma. Those who die after drinking isopropyl alcohol generally drown in their own vomit or saliva. And “there are a lot of what appear to be responsible people ending up in a coma,” Passanante says.

 

Jeff Gi, an expert mixologist and the owner of Beijing’s Mai Bar, tells me he’s been approached by vendors who offered him fake liquor at hugely discounted prices. Known for his dedication to cocktail perfection – Gi often takes five minutes to fine-tune even the simple Hendricks and tonic – Mai Bar uses only genuine alcohol.

 

“But a lot of people use fake alcohol because they want to save money, and it’s cheap,” Gi says. “They don’t care about the quality or their customer’s experience . . . and they don’t care if you come back or not.”

 

Like any black-market product, China’s counterfeit alcohol is hard to quantify. Some big liquor producers collect their own statistics on the prevalence of alcohol counterfeiting, but they keep them secret, fearing their brand might become associated with fakery and therefore altogether avoided in China’s huge and emerging consumer-goods market, says Marjana Martinic, the deputy president of the International Center for Alcohol Policies.

 

The few estimates that have emerged are disturbing. George Chen, a restaurateur who specializes in wine, told TimeOut Shanghai that his best guess is that up to 80 percent of the city’s alcohol isn’t genuine – either not meant for consumption or an inferior substitute marketed as a higher-priced brand. The chief executive of Brown-Forman, maker of Jack Daniels, has claimed that one-third of the alcohol consumed globally is produced illicitly. And the World Health Organization has found that in Southeast Asia, homebrew or other illegally procured beverages account for 69 percent of overall alcohol consumption.

 

Even anecdotally, it’s evident that fake alcohol is a big problem in China. Barely a month after the December 23 crackdown, Beijing police busted a bigger ring, arresting 88 suspects and confiscating counterfeit alcohol worth $861,000. The state-run media reported in February that a single public-security officer was responsible for monitoring the alcohol quality in more than 20 Sanlitun bars, and when I was there in March 2013, 10-kuai drinks were still abundantly available.

 

Nor is alcohol counterfeiting limited to Beijing. Last November, authorities in Zhejiang Province discovered 10,000 bottles of fake Château Lafite Rothschild, valued at around $16 million. China’s nouveau riche crave wine as a status symbol, and sometimes the flamboyant display of wealth is more pleasurable than taste; the BBC has reported that around 70 percent of the Château Lafite bottles sold in China aren’t the real thing.

 

Two years ago, Chinese police reported that at least $33,800 in fake booze had been sold around Shanghai before 25 people were caught and arrested. In Huaihua, Hunan Province, police found counterfeit alcohol valued at $675,000 in 2011; and in Shoaxing City, Zhejiang Province, police broke up a $305 million operation that had sold counterfeit alcohol in 97 Chinese cities. The China Daily reported that the suspects “had allegedly poured cheap liquors into real containers . . . that they had bought from liquor vendors and rag pickers.” And those are just a few examples.

 

Counterfeit alcohol is not only dangerous – it’s also harmful to businesses, which are already contending with China’s complicated and often corrupt economic system.

 

“It’s a nightmare. It’s an absolute nightmare,” says Charlie, a veteran bartender in China who works at The Stumble Inn in Sanlitun, who declined to give his last name. “The fake booze hurts. If you poured it in your car, it would probably work. I’ve siphoned petrol out of a car before, and it was a more pleasant taste. But it’s a roaring trade. It’s a 10-kaui mojito, and people are cheap.”

 

Charlie tells me that fake alcohol presents “a massive problem, especially when you’re trying to run a good, clean establishment.” There’s the competition factor – a rum and Coke at Stumble Inn costs about 45 yuan, compared to 10 yuan for a drink of questionable origin across the street. Moreover, customers bar-hop in Sanlitun, starting the night out at Stumble Inn and ending up at a less reputable establishment. The next morning, they show up with a brutal hangover, and they want to blame Charlie for selling them fake booze.

 

Stumble Inn has coped by establishing a reputation for an honest drink. Each bottle of liquor is examined. The latest labeling information from the company is scrutinized, and the liquor is taste- and smell-tested before it’s served. Whenever possible, the bar uses vendors recommended by the liquor companies. When it can’t, it instead consults with other expat bars to find a supplier with a good reputation. Stumble Inn also withholds 40 to 60 percent of suppliers’ payments for at least 30 days, and if even one fake is discovered, “we stop dealing with them immediately, and they will not be paid,” Charlie says. He estimates the bar spends more than $800 a month on quality control for food and drinks.

 

Vouching for the integrity of alcohol can be difficult for suppliers, too, though. Chinese manufacturers expert in forging have been known to produce not only counterfeit bottles and counterfeit liquor – some also counterfeit the customs stamps and certifications that are supposed to mark the real deal.

 

Consequently, China’s bartenders have come up with their own tests. One tells me that Jack Daniels “is the benchmark. If they’re using it, I can smell it and I can taste it. It’s the most unique-smelling alcohol there is.” An additional perk? If it’s real, Jack Daniels will leave a white band around the perimeter of a glass when it’s mixed with Coca-Cola. The fake version doesn’t. Bombay and tonic is also a good test, bartenders tell me, because it has a slightly bluish tint when exposed to light. And seasoned drinkers can often taste the difference, too.

 

Of course, the fact that bartenders and bar owners feel the need to do their own diligence is telling. China’s black market in counterfeit goods challenges not only the health of its people but also its legitimate economy. It’s essentially a short-sighted approach   economics. And like fake alcohol, it can be expected to end in one hell of a hangover.

 

 

——

Cognac shipments down -7% in March, with Asia volatility continuing

 

Source: Barclays

Apr 16th

Global Cognac shipments fell -7% in March, a turnaround from the +10% reported in February, despite a soft comparable of -1%. Exports fell -6% (+5% in February), impacted by weak reported Asian shipments. There was also a meaningful fall in domestic shipments (5% of industry), down -20%. 12-month rolling industry volumes are now up +2.4% vs. the +2.8% rate in February.

Asian shipments were soft again, down -18% following the -11% drop last month. However, the comparable was particularly tough at +28%. Chinese volumes fell -29%, following the -22% drop in February, but was cycling a +78% comparable given the earlier Chinese New Year (CNY). We note next month’s comparable will remain equally tough at +79% given the stock build last year after the CNY celebrations and ahead of price increases. The rolling 12-month shipment trend into China is now +4%, compared to the prior double-digit run-rate (c.+10%). Singaporean shipments (the largest Asian market) fell -9% vs. a -2% decrease in February, while Hong Kong fell -40%; both are markets where most of the product ends up moving into China. Taking both of these markets into account, we estimate overall exports to China fell -21% in March vs. the 12-month trend which is still up +6% (this was +9% in February).

The US, the largest global export cognac market (c.30% of exports), reported shipments up only +1% (+11% in February) while some of the larger European markets also reported weaker trends; Germany -10%, Norway -36% and Russia -27%. However, the UK reported a solid result with shipments up 15%, a continuation of the strength we have seen year to date.

There continues to be volatility in the monthly cognac data with the March dataset still impacted by the shift in Chinese New Year in our view (difficult China comparable). The focus now is on price increases taken by the industry in March/April. LVMH mentioned on its Q1 sales analyst call (April 16th) that it has taken a 4.5% price increase on VSOP brands and slightly more on XO.

Given the favourable price/mix dynamics of brown spirits and attractive industry TSRs, we remain fundamentally positive on the major spirits companies and reiterate our Overweight ratings on Diageo (PT 2400p) and Pernod (PT EUR110). However, given the current uncertainty around consumer off-take in China and concerns over the future for gifting/banqueting in the region following the recent political transition, we accept Pernod may struggle to make significant headway until greater trading clarity is established. Diageo remains our preferred play for now given its leading position in the growing US market, benefits still to come from the United Spirits acquisition in India and favourable FX tailwinds.

 

——

Drinks industry “no role” to play in alcohol policy creation – WHO (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just-Drinks

By Ben Cooper

16 April 2013

 

The alcohol industry has “no role” to play in formulating alcohol policies designed to tackle alcohol-related harm, according to the director-general of the World Health Organization.

 

The claim was made by Dr Margaret Chan in a letter to the British Medical Journal (BMJ) last week. The creation of alcohol policies must be “protected from distortion by commercial or vested interests”, said Dr Chan, who also gave explicit support to the Global Alcohol Policy Alliance (GAPA), a consortium of health NGOs and academics that has voiced its opposition to industry engagement on the issue.

 

 

——

One small glass of wine a week fine during pregnancy, suggests study

 

Pregnant women who consume low levels of alcohol ‘no more likely to have children with cognitive or behavioural problems’

 

Source: The Guardian

17 April 2013

 

Women who drink one small glass of wine a week while pregnant are no more likely to have children with cognitive or behavioural problems as those who do not drink at all during pregnancy, research suggests.

 

Light drinking during pregnancy “is not linked to adverse behavioural or cognitive outcomes in childhood”, the new study found.

 

Previous studies have linked heavy drinking during pregnancy to health and development problems in children. But the authors wanted to examine the effects of low-level consumption.

 

In the new study, published in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, more than 10,000 seven-year-olds took cognitive tests and their parents and teachers interviewed or asked to complete questionnaires.

 

The findings suggest that children born to light drinkers – those who drank two units or less a week – had lower behavioural difficulty scores than children born to mothers who abstained from drinking during pregnancy. Similarly they were found to have higher cognitive test scores for reading, maths and spatial skills tests.

 

When the authors adjusted the score for potential confounding factors, most of the results did not prove to be significant. But boys born to mothers who drank small amounts during pregnancy were found to have significantly better reading and spatial skills.

 

The paper concludes that while children born to light drinkers appeared to have more favourable developmental profiles compared with those born to mothers who did not drink during pregnancy, after statistical adjustment these differences largely disappeared.

 

“In this large, nationally representative study of seven-year-olds, there appeared to be no increased risk of a negative impact of light drinking in pregnancy on behavioural or cognitive development,” the authors wrote.

 

“Prior to statistical adjustment, children born to light drinkers appeared to have more favourable developmental profiles than children whose mothers did not drink during their pregnancies, but, after statistical adjustment, the differences largely disappeared.

 

“Our findings . support the suggestion that low levels of alcohol consumption during pregnancy are not linked to behavioural or cognitive problems during early to mid-childhood.”

 

Prof Yvonne Kelly, co-author of the study from University College London, said: “There appears to be no increased risk of negative impacts of light drinking in pregnancy on behavioural or cognitive development in seven-year-old children.

 

“We need to understand more about how children’s environments influence their behavioural and intellectual development. While we have followed these children for the first seven years of their lives, further research is needed to detect whether any adverse effects of low levels of alcohol consumption in pregnancy emerge later in childhood.”

 

The government’s advice to women who are pregnant or trying to conceive is that they should avoid alcohol altogether.

 

But if they choose to drink they should not consume more than one or two units once or twice a week.

 

 

——

Top 10 biggest US craft brewers

 

Source: the drinks business

by Andy Young

15th April, 2013

 

The Brewers Association, a not-for-profit trade group that collates production statistics for the US brewing industry, has released details of the top craft breweries in the US.

 

Craft beerThe association describes an American craft brewer as “small, independent and traditional”.

 

Small means that the brewer has an annual production of six million barrels of beer or less, “flavoured malt beverages are not considered beer for purposes of this definition”.

 

Independent means that “less than 25% of the craft brewery is owned or controlled by an alcoholic beverage industry member who is not themselves a craft brewer”. And traditional relates to “a brewer who has either an all malt flagship (the beer which represents the greatest volume among that brewers brands) or has at least 50% of its volume in either all malt beers or in beers which use adjuncts to enhance rather than lighten flavour.”

 

The association claims that there are more than 2,000 breweries in the US and 97% of these are “small and independent”, adding that “on average, most Americans live within 10 miles of a brewery, and hundreds of thousands of people have toured or tasted at their local brewery.”

 

Craft beer sales are booming in the US and the association said: “Nielsen research confirmed that beer drinkers are shifting to more robust beer styles and we know from Information Resources that seasonal beer is one of the top selling craft beer categories.”

 

Speaking about these results Paul Gatza, director of the Brewers Association, said: “In 2012, craft surpassed 6% of the total US beer market, with volume and dollar sales reaching record levels. Increasingly, beer lovers are turning to craft brewed beer from small and independent producers to satisfy their thirst for bold, innovative and flavour-forward beers.”

 

Click through the following pages to find the top 10 US craft brewers, based on 2012 beer sales volume.

 

http://www.thedrinksbusiness.com/2013/04/top-10-biggest-us-craft-brewers/

 

 

——

NABCA – Register for the 76th Annual Conference

 

Source: NABCA

Apr 16th

 

Dates:  May 15-19, 2013

Location:  Phoenix, Arizona

 

Please remember to register with NABCA by next Monday, April 22, 2013 before the fees increase!  The Arizona Biltmore room block has sold out, please contact the Meetings Department for an alternate list of hotel options.  We recommend making a reservation with one of these hotels as soon as possible.  Visit www.nabca.org for registration and rooming details.

 

For questions, please contact the Meetings Department at meetings@nabca.org or 703-578-4200.  Thank you!

 

 

——

Direct-to-consumer wine sales outperform overall US wine exports: Report

 

Source: DBR

17 April 2013

 

The US direct-to-consumer wine sales has increased by 10% to $1.46bn in 2012, which is greater than the overall value of wine exports in the US, according to 2013 Direct Shipping Report by ShipCompliant and Wines & Vines.

 

The report was prepared by combining the different transactions processed through ShipCompliant Direct compliance platform and Wines & Vines’ comprehensive database of wineries to find out the consumer shipping channel of a winery.

 

According to the report, the volume of wines shipped directly to consumer increased 7.7% to more than 3.17 million nine-liter cases in 2012, when compared to 2011 figures.

 

Among different region wineries, Napa County wineries topped the sales list with $713m worth of wine shipped in 2012. However, the value was less than the overall wine shipping channel.

 

ShipCompliant CEO Jason Eckenroth said the report will guide wineries emphasizing the importance of direct-to-consumer channel.

 

“The idea is to give wineries not just the systems to help sell to consumers, but also new ideas and insights to apply to wine sales and marketing,” Eckenroth.

 

US-based ShipCompilant provides wine and spirits suppliers and importers with automated alcohol beverage compliance tools.

 

 

——

Moscato drives US wine sales to new heights

 

Source: Decanter

by Chris Mercer in California

Tuesday 16 April 2013

Sales of wine in the US hit a new record in 2012, spurred on by drinkers’ growing thirst for Moscato.

 

Figures released by the California-based Wine Institute show that Moscato sales rose by a third in volume last year in US chain retailers, excluding bars and restaurants.

 

The grape variety, which has been talked up by hip-hop stars such as Lil’ Kim and Kanye West, now commands a 6% share of wine bought in retail chains, where it is more popular than Sauvignon Blanc and only two percentage share points behind Pinot Grigio.

 

Moscato’s rise, based largely on the lower-alcohol, lightly sparkling style, helped overall wine sales in the US to rise by 2% in 2012, to 360.1m cases. Sales rose by 5% in value, to US$34.6bn.

 

‘It is likely that American [wine] consumption will continue to expand over the next decade,’ said wine industry consultant Jon Fredrikson, of Gomberg, Fredrikson & Associates.

 

He cited strong demographics and better distribution, noting too that Facebook Gifts and Amazon have both moved into online wine sales. Direct wine shipping is now allowed in 39 US states.

 

‘Consumers have more access to wine with wine-selling locations expanding by well over 50,000 from five years ago,’ added Danny Brager, vice president of beverage alcohol practice at Nielsen.

 

California accounted for 58% of wine sales by volume and close to 64% of sales by value in the US last year.

 

Other varietals performing well in chain retailers included Malbec, which saw volume sales rise by a fifth in this channel off a low base. Sweet red wine is also considered a style to watch.

 

 

——

Non-sulphur wines ‘a reality’ with natural preservative

 

Source: the drinks business

by Rupert Millar

16th April, 2013

 

Integrapes, a company in Italy, is currently testing an anti-oxidant and anti-bacterial preservative derived from grape pips that it claims is as effective as sulphur.

 

Furthermore, the wine is supposed to retain more of its natural aromas, particularly the more delicate floral aromas that sulphur can cover.

 

Derived from the polyphenols found naturally in grape seeds, the resulting solution is added to the must and wine at various points in the winemaking process.

 

The kits vary only slightly for red, white, rosé and sparkling but essentially involve one litre of the preservative added to every 20 hectolitres of wine at the end of the alcoholic and then malolactic fermentations and then prior to bottling.

 

The resulting wine is then non-sulphur but supposedly with the potential to age, something many “natural” wines are criticised for not doing.

 

Commercial director, Donatello Calaprice, told the drinks business that the company had been experimenting and conducting trials for the past seven years and still had wines from that time which are drinkable.

 

He described the method as a form of “homeopathy”.

 

Integrapes compares four figures regarding levels of sulphur, anti-oxidants (in vitro using both the Folin-Ciocalteu Index and ORAC Unit) and pigmentation (anthocyanins C3GE) in wines using sulphur and those using Integrapes method.

 

In nearly all cases, wines (red, white and sparkling) produced with Integrapes’ solution outperform those produced with sulphur.

 

For example, a 100% Cabernet Sauvignon displayed sulphur levels of 2mg per litre, registered 50.05 on the Folin-Ciocalteu Index, 120.33 C3GE/100ml (anthocyanins equivalent) and 16,665 ORAC Units.

 

By contrast, the Cabernet Sauvignon produced normally displayed equivalent results of: 41mg/L SO2, 35.55 on the Folin-Ciocalteu Index, 32.22 C3GE/100ml and 11,820 ORAC Units.

 

The product has been endorsed by one of Italy’s leading wine writers Luca Maroni, who is also collaborating in the on-going tests.

 

He has stated: “I have tasted hundreds of wines from around the world developed without sulphur dioxide (natural, organic, biodynamic, etc.).

 

“But so far each of these has turned out to be, irreversibly, off, oxidised or stained by oenological processing defects which compromise the integrity of the fruit.

 

“Then I tasted the first white wine produced with the Integrapes method and the fruit was blameless, pure and oxidatively still intact.

 

“The dream of wine without added sulphites in now a reality.”

 

 

——

Parker and Galloni settle dispute

 

Source: Decanter

by Adam Lechmere

Tuesday 16 April 2013

Robert Parker’s Wine Advocate and its former correspondent Antonio Galloni have settled their dispute out of court.

 

Antonio Galloni told Decanter.com he could make no comment on the confidential settlement but he said the dispute had been resolved amicably.

 

On the erobertparker.com bulletin board, Robert Parker said, ‘We are pleased to announce that The Wine Advocate and [Galloni’s company] All Grapes Media have resolved all of our outstanding issues amicably, and The Wine Advocate has withdrawn its lawsuit against Mr Galloni and All Grapes Media.’

 

In March, the Wine Advocate announced it was suing its former California correspondent for breach of contract, fraud and defamation.

 

Galloni, who was contracted by the influential wine journal for a reported US$300,000 a year to cover California wines, resigned earlier this year after a majority share in the Wine Advocate was bought by a group of Singaporean investors.

 

The crux of the Wine Advocate’s suit was a report on Sonoma wines that Galloni was due to deliver, explaining to subscribers on his new website that he would not be able to do justice to the diversity of the region in time for the Wine Advocate’s February issue.

 

Parker said, ‘We expect that Antonio’s Sonoma report will appear in the April issue of The Wine Advocate and that Antonio’s Brunello reviews will be added to our data base sometime in May. We thank our subscribers for their patience during this period.’

 

 

——

20 Individuals From Across the United States Earn Title of Advanced Sommelier

 

Martin Sheehan-Stross of San Francisco Takes Home the Rudd Scholarship

 

Source: WineBusiness.com

Apr 15th

 

Five days of intense examination culminated today with 20 new names being added to the Court of Master Sommeliers, Americas list of distinguished Advanced Sommeliers.

 

Held at Disney’s Grand Californian Resort from April 8-12, 39 candidates sat for the exam, which is the third in a series of four increasingly challenging tests of knowledge and skill offered by the court. At this level, candidates with a superior understanding of wine theory and beverage service, as well as a highly sophisticated tasting ability, are distinguished from the thousands of wine service professionals who attempt the court’s exams on a yearly basis. Of the 20 passers, one rose to the top as the exam’s highest scorer. Martin Sheehan-Stross of San Francisco earned the Rudd Scholarship, offered by the Guild of Sommeliers, which provides funds toward the coursework needed to prepare for the Masters Exam and an invitation to attend the prestigious Rudd Masters Roundtable in Napa Valley, California.

 

By the time candidates reach the Advanced Examination, most have already invested years of study, in addition to significant time working in and around the beverage industry. From here, they’ll set their sights on the Court’s Master Sommelier Diploma Exam, which just 197 individuals worldwide have ever managed to pass.

 

“The dedication and talent needed to pass this portion of the exam and succeed in this field is tremendous,” said Shayn Bjornholm, the examination director for the Court of Master Sommeliers, Americas. “It is a pleasure to see such impressive qualities in these 20 individuals, and their commitment and enthusiasm is an inspiration to the industry.”

 

“I am pleased to welcome these exceptional individuals to the next level in wine education,” said Greg Harrington, dhairman of the Court of Master Sommeliers, Americas. “They should all be, as we are, extremely proud of their achievements.”

 

The complete list of candidates who earned the title of Advanced Sommelier at the recent Anaheim, California exam includes:

 

    Martin Beally (Seattle, WA)

    Caryn Benke (Andina Restaurant, Portland, OR)

    Paul Coker (Stonehill Tavern at St. Regis, Monarch Beach, CA)

    Lauren Collins (L’Espalier, Boston, MA)

   Nicholas Daddona (Boston Harbor Hotel, Boston, MA)

    Michael Dolinski (Restaurant Gordon Ramsay at the London, New York, NY)

    John Filkins (Wit & Wisdom, A Tavern by Michael Mina at Four Seasons, Baltimore, MD)

    Alexander Good (Alloy Dining Ltd., Calgary, Alberta, Canada)

    Sean Isono (Halekulani, Honolulu, HI)

    Carlin Karr (Frasca Food & Wine, Boulder, CO)

    Patrick Miner (Ruth’s Chris Steakhouse, Walnut Creek, CA)

    Jeremiah Morehouse (SPQR, San Francisco, CA)

    Steven Murphey (Mid-State Wine and Liq., Houston, TX)

    Carolyn Peete (Charleston, SC)

    Cameron Porter (Los Olivos Wine Merchant and Café, Los Olivos, CA)

    Benjamin Roberts (Masraff’s Restaurant, Houston, TX)

    Martin Sheehan-Stross (San Francisco, CA)

    Jonathan Sloane (Quince, San Francisco, CA)

    Ryan Stetins (Napa, CA)

    Shane Taylor (Blue Water Café, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada)

 

About the Court of Master Sommeliers

The Court of Master Sommeliers was established in England in 1977 to encourage improved standards of beverage knowledge and service in hotels and restaurants. The first Master Sommelier Diploma Exam to be held in the United States was in 1987. The title Master Sommelier marks the highest recognition of wine and spirits knowledge, beverage service abilities, and professionalism in the hospitality trade. Education was then, and remains today, the Court’s charter. There are four stages involved in attaining the top qualifications of Master Sommelier: 1) Introductory Sommelier Course; 2) Certified Sommelier Exam; 3) Advanced Sommelier Course; and 4) Master Sommelier Diploma. There are 129 professionals who have earned the title of Master Sommelier as part of the Americas chapter since the organization’s inception. Of those, 111 are men and 18 are women. There are 197 professionals worldwide who have received the title of Master Sommelier since the first Master Sommelier Diploma Exam. For more information, visit www.mastersommeliers.org.

 

 

——

William Grant & Sons appoints new US chief (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just-Drinks

By James Wilmore

16 April 2013

 

William Grant & Sons has promoted one of its senior executives to the role of managing director and president of its US division.

 

The appointment of Jonathan Yusen, currently the company’s senior US marketing VP, was announced by the UK-headquartered group today (16 April). Yusen replaces Simon Hunt, who was recently promoted to the newly-created role of the group’s chief commercial officer, the Glenfiddich distiller said.

 

 

——

Mendocino Wine Company Names Verónica E. Portello as Western Division Manager

 

Source: Balzac

Apr 16th

 

Mendocino Wine Company, a family-owned wine company based in Mendocino, California, has named Verónica E. Portello as Western Division Manager, effective April 8, 2013.

 

With over 19 years of experience in the wine and spirits industry, Portello is a proven performer. Prior to joining Mendocino Wine Company, Portello spent time at Freixenet as their West Division Sales Manager, Vice President of National Accounts at Huneeus Vintners, and at Aveniu Brands as Regional Sales Director.

 

“Having called on the entire west at some time or another, I am thrilled to take on the division manager position at Mendocino Wine Company,” said Portello. “Brand building is my strength, and I look forward to working closely with the distributor network in promoting, growing and educating the public on the fantastic wines of MWC. Working alongside the Thornhill family and with industry veterans such as Gary Glass and John Girty will be a great honor for me.”

 

“We are very excited to have Verónica on our team,” stated Chase Thornhill, Senior Brand Manager for Mendocino Wine Company. “With her years of knowledge and experience she’s a perfect fit, and we look forward to growing the brands with her help.”

 

About Mendocino Wine Company

Formed in 2004, the Mendocino Wine Co. (MWC) owns and operates Parducci Wine Cellars, Mendocino’s oldest winery, as well as Paul Dolan Vineyards, Sketchbook and Wines That Rock, among others. The Thornhill family continues the tradition of making award-winning wines using sustainable wine growing and land use practices.

 

 

——

Tesco profits halve as supermarket group confirms US exit

 

Tesco, Britain’s biggest retailer, has reported its first fall in profits since the early 1990s after its decision to pull out of the US cost more than £1bn and a slowdown in sales in the UK also hit the company.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Graham Ruddick

17 Apr 2013

 

Philip Clarke, chief executive, said the results “are natural consequences of the strategic changes we first began over a year ago and which conclude today”.

 

Mr Clarke launched a strategic review of Tesco’s US venture Fresh & Easy last year and has now confirmed that the company will exit the business.

 

Sir Terry Leahy, Mr Clarke’s predecessor, launched Fresh & Easy in 2007 but it is yet to make a profit.

 

In order to exit Fresh & Easy, Mr Clarke has been forced to book a £1bn writedown on the value of Tesco’s assets in the US. On top of £169m of trading losses in the last year, this means the US venture has wiped £1.2bn from profits.

 

In the UK, Tesco has also written off £804m after deciding not to build stores on more than 100 sites that it controls.

 

The company said: “We have reviewed all of the schemes included in the pipeline individually, assessing their viability and potential to deliver an appropriate level of return on capital employed if built out.

 

“As a result, we have identified more than 100 sites – the majority of which were bought between five and ten years ago, at a higher point in the property cycle – which we no longer plan to develop and have therefore written their values down.”

 

Last year, Mr Clarke launched a £1bn investment plan to revitalise Tesco in the UK after it was forced to warn that profits would be lower than expected.

 

This plan included hiring more staff, revamping stores, and relaunching food ranges, such as converting Tesco Value into Everyday Value.

 

Mr Clarke said Tesco is making “real progress” in the UK.

 

However, trading profits in the 52 weeks to February 23 fell 8.3pc to £2.3bn.

 

In total, Tesco reported pre-tax profits of £1.96bn, a 52pc drop on last year. However, this does not include the US writedown, which has been accounted for as a discontinued operation. When this is included, Tesco made just £120m after tax, compared to £2.8bn last year.

 

The company held its final dividend at 10.13p.

 

Mr Clarke said: “The announcements made today are natural consequences of the strategic changes we first began over a year ago and which conclude today.

 

“With profound and rapid change in the way consumers live their lives, our objective is to be the best multichannel retailer for customers.

 

“Our plan to ‘Build a Better Tesco’ is on track and I am pleased with the real progress in the UK. We have already made substantial improvements to our customers’ shopping experience, which are starting to be reflected in a better performance.

 

“We have set the business on the right track to deliver realistic, sustainable and attractive returns and long-term growth for shareholders. The consequences are non-cash write-offs relating to the United States, from which we today confirm our decision to exit, and for UK property investments which we will not pursue because of our fundamentally different approach to space.

 

“We have also faced external challenges which have affected our performance, notably in Europe and Korea.

 

“Our focus now is on disciplined and targeted investment in those markets with significant growth potential and the opportunity to deliver strong returns.”

 

 

——

Target lowers Q1 sales and profit forecast

 

Source: RT

By Mike Troy

April 16, 2013

 

Softer than expected sales trends prompted Target to lower its first quarter earnings outlook Tuesday morning.

 

The company said it now expects first quarter comps to be flat, after previously forecasting a range of flat to 2% growth. The softer than expected sales prompted the company to revise first quarter adjusted profit expectations to an unspecified level of “slightly below” earlier guidance of $1.10 to $1.20.

 

The reduced guidance was offered as part of a financial update connected to the company’s recent settlement of a debt tender offer and credit card portfolio sale. According to the company, factors contributing to the reduction included losses related to the early retirement of debt of approximately $445 million, or 41 cents per share and expected earnings per share dilution of 23 cents related to the company’s Canadian segment somewhat offset by accounting gains of approximately 36 cents associated with the sale of Target’s entire consumer credit card receivables portfolio to TD Bank Group.

 

The sales weakness was characterized as softer than expected, but Target chairman, president and CEO Gregg Steinhafel did offer a heavy dose of pessimism when sharing his first quarter outlook back in February when fourth quarter results were reported.

 

“As we enter 2013, we will plan appropriately, as the U.S. economy is growing at a painfully slow rate and unemployment remains persistently high,” Steinhafel said during the company’s fourth quarter conference call. “While there are some encouraging signs in the housing market, volatility in consumer confidence, the payroll tax increase, and rise in the price of gas all present incremental headwinds. Given these new challenges facing an already sluggish economy, we have a tempered view of the near-term sales environment.”

 

Despite the first quarter weakness, Target maintained its full year profit forecast which calls for adjusted earnings per share in the range of $4.85 to $5.05.

 

Target currently operates 1,784 in the United States and 24 units in Canada.

 

 

——

Minnesota: Minnesota brewers, liquor lobbyists say proposed alcohol tax hike will hit consumers

 

Source: Associated Press

By Kyle Potter

Apr 16th

 

Lawmakers’ plan to boost alcohol taxes in Minnesota could add as much as $2 to the cost of a standard 12-pack of beer, local brewers and liquor lobbyists said Tuesday as they tried to rally opposition to the proposed tax spike.

 

House Democrats argue that a hike in Minnesota’s alcohol excise tax, which was part of the tax package they unveiled Monday, would be a small, 7-cent-per-drink increase to help the state raise revenue and pay for the social costs of alcoholism. But executives at two of Minnesota’s largest homegrown breweries said the proposal would quadruple their annual tax bills and eventually hit beer drinkers’ wallets.

 

“Ultimately, we throw our customers under the bus and expect them to pay for this,” said Mark Stutrud, founder and CEO of St. Paul’s Summit Brewing. “I’m terribly uncomfortable.”

 

Minnesota charges brewers and wholesalers that sell their products in the state a different excise tax rate based on the type of alcohol. Currently, brewers including Summit pay the state $4.60 for every 31-gallon barrel they brew. Liquors and other spirits are currently charged $1.33 for each liter bottle. For bottles of wine, it varies based on alcoholic content.

 

Those rates haven’t changed since 1987. The House tax bill looks to bump up all of those taxes, by as much as $27.75 for each barrel of beer.

 

Summit expects to brew about 120,000 barrels of beer this year, Stutrud said. Even after a $1.4 million tax credit, the proposed increase would

increase Summit’s tax bill to the state from about $550,000 last year to about $1.9 million. Ted Marti, president of August Schell Brewing Co., said he expects a similar figure for his brewery in New Ulm, Minn.

 

Stutrud and other opponents of that increase said it would compound as a barrel travels to the consumer: Brewers will hike their prices to distributors to cover the cost of the tax increase, then distributors will do the same before selling to retailers. Eventually, the trickledown results in higher prices on bar menus and liquor store shelves.

 

“It’s not 7 cents a drink anymore. It’s terrible spin. It’s a lie,” Stutrud said.

 

House Tax Committee Chairwoman Ann Lenczewski, DFL-Bloomington, said she doesn’t buy that argument.

 

Lenczewski said the projected revenue from the excise tax increase would do little to tackle an estimated $3 billion in costs for alcohol abuse.

 

“We’re trying to get the high users of alcohol to help the state recoup some of its costs,” she said.

 

Lenczewski said the bill deliberately provides extra help to Minnesota brewers small and large. It includes a tax credit that wipes out the excise tax for up to 50,000 barrels a year, so microbreweries would be off the hook. Brewers and wholesalers who sell more than 200,000 barrels a year aren’t eligible.

 

“They don’t feel that way because it’s a tax increase, but they’re getting special, preferential tax treatment,” she said.

 

Stutrud said Summit is on track to pass that 200,000-barrel threshold in the next five to six years, and August Schell may do the same. That means both companies could lose that tax credit.

 

Even at that point, Marti said: “You’re by no means a large brewer.”

 

 

——

Mississippi: Governor vetoes bill allowing transport of liquor through dry counties

 

Source: Associated Press

April 16,2013

 

Gov. Phil Bryant has vetoed a bill that would have allowed Mississippians to transport a limited amount of unopened alcohol through dry counties.

 

Senate Bill 2526 was passed during the waning days of the 2013 session. The bill would let a person buy the liquor in a wet county and drive through dry counties to another wet county. The bill also set limits on how much unopened liquor could be transported.

 

In his veto message, Bryant said the bill would undermine illegal liquor enforcement in Mississippi.

 

He said state law barring possession of alcohol in a dry county is straightforward.

 

“However, if the law is amended to permit the carrying of alcohol through such jurisdictions, then officers will be required to question every person they encounter who is in possession of alcohol to determine whether the person is merely passing through on his or her way to a wet jurisdiction.

 

“Further, such a person could create an issue of fact, and probably require a full-blown trial, simply by claiming that he or she was on his way to a wet county. Consequently, the prohibitions applicable in dry counties would be much more difficult to enforce,” Bryant said.

 

Mississippi in 1966 became the last state in the nation to legalize liquor sales, but only in counties that agreed to exempt themselves from the state’s prohibition. Mississippi has a patchwork of “wet” and “dry” counties.

How To Join Our Newsletter

4-1-13

Liquor Industry News 4-5-13

April 5, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Friday April 5th 2013

Biodynamic ROOT Day

 

Brown-Forman to Distribute Jägermeister in Australia

 

Source: Business Wire

Apr 4th

 

Brown-Forman Australia (NYSE:BF-A – News) (NYSE:BF-B – News) announced today that it has been appointed the exclusive distribution rights to Jägermeister, effective July 1, 2013. Jägermeister has become a leading liqueur brand in Australia since it was introduced eleven years ago, transcending pop culture and building legions of loyal consumers.

 

In September of last year, Jägermeister introduced two RTDs in Australia, Jägermeister Raw and Jägermeister Ginger & Lime, to offer the great taste of Jägermeister as premium all natural RTDs. These were the first two brand extensions in the history of the franchise and provide a strong platform for future growth.

 

“Jägermeister has achieved an enviable position in the on-premise and achieved national distribution since its introduction to the Australian market and is experiencing encouraging early results for the RTDs,” said Marshall Farrer, managing director for Brown-Forman Australia. “We are pleased to add this brand to our portfolio in Australia.”

 

“After more than a decade of great success, we now look forward to taking Jägermeister to the next level in the Australian market,” said David Bell, Regional Director Asia Pacific at Mast-Jägermeister SE.

 

Suntory will continue to distribute Jägermeister through June 30 and the companies will jointly work to ensure a smooth transition for all customers.

 

 

——

AB InBev Near Final Agreement With U.S. Over Modelo Deal

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Sara Forden

Apr 5, 2013

 

Anheuser-Busch InBev NV (ABI) and the U.S. Justice Department are close to a settlement of a lawsuit seeking to block the brewer’s purchase of Grupo Modelo SAB, three people familiar with the matter said.

 

An agreement will probably be announced next week, said the people, who asked not to be named because the discussions are confidential. There’s a chance both sides will seek a short extension of an April 9 deadline to report progress on a settlement to the federal judge in charge of the case so they can put the final touches on the deal, two of the people said.

 

AB InBev is negotiating with the Justice Department for approval of a revised merger plan that would have Modelo sell control of all its brands in the U.S., as well as a brewery it built in Piedras Negras, Mexico, to Constellation Brands Inc. (STZ), a winemaker and beverage distribution company.

 

The department is reviewing Constellation’s plan to boost brewing capacity at the Piedras Negras plant by about 70 percent to ensure that Modelo-brand products would remain viable competitors in the U.S. beer market, two people familiar with the matter said March 8.

 

AB InBev rose 0.2 percent to 76.65 euros at 9:04 a.m. in Brussels trading. Constellation fell 0.2 percent to $48.25 in New York yesterday, while Modelo was unchanged at 112 pesos in Mexico City.

Stock Moves

 

Laura Vallis, a spokeswoman for Leuven, Belgium-based AB InBev in New York, and Angie Blackwell, a Constellation representative, declined to comment on the prospects for settlement. Jennifer Shelley, a Modelo spokeswoman, and Gina Talamona of the Justice Department, also declined to comment.

 

The Justice Department will probably demand in the consent decree that Constellation make its commitments binding to invest in the expansion of the Piedras Negras plant, said Sandeep Vaheesan, special counsel with the American Antitrust Institute and author of a white paper recommending that the transaction be blocked. The department will also probably insist Modelo transfer to Constellation employees with marketing, distribution and production experience in the beer market, Vaheesan said.

 

“The Justice Department probably wants to make sure that Constellation, which has been principally focused on wine and spirits, can fill the shoes of Modelo, which is a brewer,” Vaheesan said.

 

 

——

Global companies eye stake in Original Choice maker

 

Source: Times of India

Boby Kurian

Apr 4, 2013

 

Three global spirits companies have evinced preliminary interest to buy a large stake in Bangalore-based John Distilleries, makers of Original Choice, which is among the top six Indian whiskey brands.

 

Family-owned Scottish distiller William Grant & Sons, Thai Beverage Public Company (ThaiBev) and Beam Inc have signed non-disclosure agreements ahead of starting formal talks, said banking sources familiar with the matter.

 

John Distilleries mandated Morgan Stanley to find a foreign strategic partner, who could emerge as the largest shareholder, in a deal pegging the enterprise value of the company at Rs 900 crore.

 

 

——

GS survey bullish on the US consumer, especially at the high end

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

Apr 4th

 

US consumer sentiment and spending intent continues to rise

We conducted our regular quarterly survey of 2,000 US consumers, a data series that dates to 2005. The survey was in the field in mid-late February, subsequent to the 2% payroll tax hike, and incorporates the impact of delayed tax rebates and higher gasoline prices. Despite headwinds, consumers reported continued improvement in sentiment towards the economy and the highest intent-to-spend levels since the financial crisis.

 

Balance sheets bolster consumers; a lower savings rate may help offset higher taxes in 2013

Our survey suggests three reasons why the savings rate may fall in 2013, buoying consumer spending and potentially fully offsetting the impact of higher taxes: (1) consumers reported an increase in credit card debt this quarter, (2) those with jobs were most inclined to re-lever their balance sheets (and the economy is currently creating jobs at a pace of two million annually), and (3) for the first time since the financial crisis, more consumers thought their home value was rising rather than falling.

 

The delta between high- and low-income households has widened

While an improved consumer outlook was universal in the survey, it was more pronounced amongst high-income households (over $90K) relative to lower-income households (under $50K); the delta between these two groups in our survey hit a new high. At the category level, our survey suggests Travel/Entertainment and Accessories as the most over-indexed to high-income households. We also highlight the following 11 stocks which have high-end exposure and are Buy-rated: BLMN, EL, KORS, PNRA, SBUX, TSLA, TFM, TUMI, VAC, WFM, WYN.

 

Consumers demand for Autos and Accessories rising

In terms of sectors, the greatest increase in demand versus a year ago in our survey was in Autos. Our Auto analyst Pat Archambault believes this dynamic is likely to persist for several years as SAAR normalizes after the crisis. He highlights F as the best way to prosecute this theme.

 

We also highlight Accessories (i.e., jewelry, handbags) where demand is rising at an increasing rate in our survey. Our Specialty Apparel analyst Lindsey Drucker Mann believes branded accessories are in a robust growth cycle and highlights KORS and TUMI.

 

 

——

Gunmaker Sues Liquor Co. Over Tommy Guns Vodka

 

Source: Law 360

By Bill Donahue

April 04, 2013

 

The company behind the famed Thompson submachine gun, better known as the Tommy gun, sued an Illinois liquor maker last week for selling a brand of vodka under the trademarked gun name.

 

New York-based Saeilo Enterprises Inc. still produces and sells the gun, which rose to infamy as the weapon of choice for Prohibition-era mobsters and has long been a staple of the Hollywood arsenal. On March 27, it said Alphonse Capone Enterprises Inc. has been trying to tread on that fame by selling a product called Tommy Guns Vodka.

 

“Defendant’s unauthorized use of the Tommy gun marks is … willful and has been done with the intention of trading upon the valuable goodwill built up by Saeilo in its long-used and trusted Tommy gun marks,” Saeilo says. “Defendant intended to confuse, cause mistake or deceive consumers.”

 

Saeilo’s suit also claims that Tommy Guns Vodka, which comes in a glass bottle shaped like famous submachine gun, also infringes the company’s trade dress rights to the Tommy gun.

 

In total, the 10-count complaint against Alphonse Capone Enterprises lists claims of infringement, dilution, false designation of origin and trade dress infringement under the federal Lanham Act, state-law claims of infringement and deceptive practices, and common law unfair competition and and infringement.

 

The gunmaker wants a permanent injunction barring Tommy Guns Vodka from store shelves, as well as an award of damages, attorneys’ fees and costs.

 

It wasn’t clear at press time whether the vodka was still being sold. A company website for Alphonse Capone Enterprises, which appeared to be updated infrequently, said the vodka was launched in January 2005. The company couldn’t be reached for comment.

 

Saeilo has been aggressive in defending its control of the Tommy gun name and look. It sued a company last month for selling toy replica Tommy guns that bore the name, and hit a similar company with a case over toy guns in late 2011.

 

The case filed in March is still pending; Saeilo eventually dropped the earlier suit.

 

Saeilo is represented by Boris Umansky of Dennemeyer & Associates LLC.

 

Counsel information for Alphonse Capone Enterprises wasn’t immediately available.

 

The case is Saeilo Enterprises Inc. v. Alphonse Capone Enterprises Inc., case number 1:13-cv-02306, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

 

 

——

Pernod Ricard pockets £108m in Chivas dividends

 

Source: The Scotsman

By PETER RANSCOMBE

5 April 2013

 

CHIVAS Brothers, Scotland’s second-largest whisky distiller, has paid dividends worth a total of £108 million over the past 18 months to French parent company Pernod Ricard as demand from emerging markets continues to drive Scotch sales.

 

The Paisley-based producer – which makes whiskies including Chivas Regal, the Glenlivet and Royal Salute – toasted soaring sales and profits in the year to 30 June, according to accounts filed at Companies House.

 

The latest financial figures cover the period before a wider slowdown in the growth of exports reported earlier this week by the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) trade body.

 

Chivas Brothers – which also owns whisky labels such as 100 Pipers, Passport and Something Special – posted a 17 per cent rise in pre-tax profits to £201.9m on the back of an 18 per cent rise in sales to £610.1m.

 

Growth in its Scotch business out-stripped that for Pernod Ricard as a whole in 2011-12. The Paris-listed group – which also owns brands including Absolut vodka, Beefeater gin and Jacob’s Creek wines – reported a 9 per cent rise in profits to ?2.1 billion (£1.8bn) on the back of an 8 per cent increase in sales to ?8.2bn. In February, Pernod Ricard warned of slower growth in Scotch sales in Asia during its current financial year, following the handover of political power in China and structural changes in the South Korean market.

 

No-one from Chivas Brothers was available to give an update on current trading yesterday, but its accounts revealed that the subsidiary has continued to pay hefty dividends to its parent.

 

A total of £23.6m was paid in the year to 30 June, with the notes to the accounts showing that a further ?69.8m was paid in January and monthly dividends have already totalled £24.9m so far in its current ­financial year, exceeding the previous year’s total.

 

The accounts showed that the company had also reached an agreement to fund its pension scheme, with a one-off payment of £60.5m and an asset-backed funding structure secured against some properties.

 

News of the payouts comes just a day after larger rival Diageo – Scotland’s biggest distiller and owner of the Bell’s, Johnnie Walker and Talisker brands – announced that it will build a £50m “super-distillery” near ­Alness in Easter Ross.

 

The facility – which will become Scotland’s largest malt ­distillery, capable of producing 13 million litres of spirit each year – will dwarf Diageo’s 10.2m-litre Roseisle site, which opened in 2010, and Pernod Ricard’s Glenlivet development, which has been expanded in recent years to produce ten million litres. Alan Gray, a whisky analyst at Edinburgh-based investment software firm Sutherland’s, said large companies such as Diageo and Pernod Ricard were investing in production to meet demand in five-to-ten year’s time.

 

Export figures from the SWA showed that the volume of whisky sent overseas fell by 5 per cent year-on-year in 2012, which was blamed on the slowdown in the eurozone and changes to duty levels in France. Demand from emerging markets continued to grow.

 

 

——

Diageo’s open offer for United Spirits shares to start on April 10

 

Source: Economic Times

By Reuters

5 Apr, 2013

 

UK drinks group Diageo’s mandatory tender offer to buy up to 26 per cent of shares in United Spirits will start on April 10 and end on April 26, a manager for the deal said on Friday.

 

The price for the tender offer to United Spirits shareholders will remain at Rs 1,440 ($26) a share, JM Financial BSE 1.80 % said in a notice to the Bombay Stock Exchange. United Spirits shares were trading at Rs 1,841 on Friday.

 

 

——

Brits are biggest in-flight boozers

 

Source: the drinks business

by Patrick Schmitt

4th April, 2013

 

British air passengers have been voted the heaviest drinkers according to a survey of 700 international cabin crew by Skyscanner.

 

54% of Brits begin their holiday with a drink in the airport or onboard a flight.

 

Holidaying Brits beat the Russians into second place according to the travel site, which also polled UK passengers for their reaction to the concept of alcohol-free flights.

 

According to Skyscanner research, over half of Brits admit to starting their holiday with a drink either in the airport or onboard the plane.

 

However, 41% of respondents said they would book an alcohol-free flight should it be offered – with a quarter of those saying that this was to avoid the risk of sharing a plane with drunken passengers.

 

The survey followed a suggestion in November last year by Russian officials to ban vodka on some flights after a report by Russian national carrier Aeroflot identified over 1,000 incidents of drunk passengers being abusive, attacking the crew and fellow passengers and even trying to get inside the cockpit.

 

Interestingly, the Skyscanner survey also revealed that Brits aged 18-24 were biggest supporters of an in-flight alcohol ban, while travellers from the North East of the UK were most opposed to introducing such a restriction.

 

Commenting on the findings, Skyscanner’s Victoria Bailie said, “Although British and Russian travellers might be the biggest on-board drinkers, these results are a clear sign that the popularity of alcohol-free flights is on the rise.

 

“It seems that travellers would prefer to forgo their favourite tipple rather than spend several hours sitting next to someone who has had one too many,” she added.

 

The survey failed to flag up the fact that Britain’s biggest drinkers are likely to booze more heavily before boarding the plane should an in-flight ban be imposed.

 

 

——

United Kingdom: Street disorder drops after Ipswich bans super-strength alcohol

 

Police say campaign stopping sale of strong cider and beer is improving safety

 

Source: The Independent

Martin Hickman

Thursday 04 April 2013

 

An East Anglian town has seen a dramatic fall in street disorder since most of its shopkeepers banned the sale of super-strength alcohol. Suffolk police said there had been a 49 per cent reduction in “street drinker events” in Ipswich during the first six months of the voluntary Reducing the Strength campaign.

 

The experiment was launched by police and the Co-op in September amid concern at the behaviour of itinerant drinkers intoxicated by the likes of Tennent’s Super and Carlsberg Special Brew.

 

At the time, the Government was backing plans for a minimum price for alcohol to stop supermarkets and  off-licences selling ultra-cheap strong cider and beer. Although the Coalition has reportedly since ditched its national plan, Ipswich is half-way through the first year of its local initiative.

 

At its outset, 53 stores halted the sale of cheap beers, lagers and ciders with an alcohol volume of at least 6.5 per cent. Now, 80 shops are taking part including Tesco, Debenhams, M&S, BHS, Waitrose, Sainsbury’s and Aldi, equating to two-thirds of the town’s 122 stores.

 

Updating the public on progress, Suffolk police said that between last September and this March the public had reported 94 “street drinker events” to police, compared with 191 events during the same period in the previous year, a drop of 49.2 per cent.

 

Local businesses have also reported positive effects, with surveys revealing a 20 per cent fall in the number of people stating they witnessed “a high level of street drinking around their premises.” But there was no change in the number of reported crime and anti-social behaviour outside stores owned by the Co-op. Police said that was against a background of falling incidents of crime and anti-social behaviour across the town.

 

Tim Newcomb, Assistant Chief Constable at Suffolk police, said: “We wanted to reduce the number of stores selling these products and to reduce the amount of crime and anti-social behaviour occurring in and around  off-licensed premises in the town.

 

“We are far from being able to say that we have fully achieved these aims, but we can say that we are seeing some clear improvements and that the campaign is helping us move towards an even safer town.

 

“Our results directly related to this campaign in relation to crime and ASB [anti-social behaviour] are limited at this point, but are set against the backdrop of fantastic work carried out by police and partners to tackle issues connected with street drinking in Ipswich. Reducing the Strength will add to these results and will help in providing these vulnerable people with routes out of their chaotic lifestyles.”

 

The police praised the “fantastic support” independent and national retailers had given the scheme, adding that many had shared its view that removing the products would help the community.

 

Assistant Chief Constable Newcomb added: “There are still a third of these stores in Ipswich that are continuing to sell these items however, and we will now work with these businesses, along with our partners, to further discuss the benefits of the campaign.”

 

A significant number of police forces and public-sector agencies across the UK have been in contact with Suffolk police to discuss the campaign, which has the backing of Ipswich Borough Council, Suffolk County Council and NHS Suffolk.

 

 

——

Australia: Industry slams rehashed AIC figures on societal costs of alcohol

 

Source: The Shout

By Amy Looker

Fri, 05/04/2013

 

A new report on the costs of alcohol misuse released by the Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) is based on flawed research, according to two leading industry associations.

 

Both the Australian Liquor Stores Association (ALSA) and the Australian Hotels Association (AHA) have fired back in response to the AIC study released earlier this week, which ALSA and AHA say is an update of the 2008 Collins & Lapsley report that has since been discredited by leading international economist, Dr. Eric Crampton.

 

Crampton’s critique of the Collins & Lapsley methodology found that the estimated $15 billion social cost of alcohol misuse per annum was grossly overstated and estimated the real cost to be no more than around $3.8 billion per annum.

 

According to ALSA’s chief executive, Terry Mott, the AIC report states that over $7 billion of consumers’ money is already collected every year in alcohol taxation, which he says is around double any realistic estimate as quoted by Crampton & Burgess at approximately $3.8 billion.

 

“The economic cost modelling used in the Collins & Lapsley study were not meaningful, had been shown to be flawed and were not based upon standard economic models,” Mott said.

 

He added that the focus should remain on creating meaningful debate and developing targeted interventions for high-risk groups, not simply adding another overall tax on all consumers.

 

“The goal should be to change the behaviours of individuals who drink to get drunk, which is why ALSA also support DrinkWise – a not-for-profit, independent research and social change agency funded by the Australian alcohol industry, that is dedicated to building a safer drinking culture in Australia.”

 

AHA’s national chief executive officer, Des Crowe, said the hotel industry is also concerned by the AIC’s use of what it describes as “flawed” research.

 

“There are both costs and benefits of consuming alcohol,” Crowe said.

 

“Until a more balanced view emerges from the research community that recognises this reality, cost of harm studies should not be used by policy makers to justify further regulation or intervention in the hotel industry.”

 

 

——

Indulge in China’s Latest Export

 

Source: WSJ

By WILL LYONS

Apr 4th

 

There are still a few wine-producing countries left on the map that command genuine novelty value. China may boast the world’s fifth-largest vineyard area and a thirsty domestic population that consumes nearly all of its wine, but in fine-wine circles, its presence in Europe is still headline news. True to form, when Britain’s oldest wine merchant, Berry Bros. & Rudd, announced last month that they were stocking four wines from Changyu, China’s largest and oldest winery, a slew of articles appeared detailing this vinous curiosity.

 

Actually, the rebirth of Chinese fine wine has been a few years in the making. In 2011, I had a first taste: the 2009 Cabernet Sauvignon blend by He Lan Qing Xue. Made in Ningxia, a small, landlocked province in Central China, it won the best red Bordeaux varietal over £10 at the Decanter World Wine Awards. I thought it was a reasonable effort, but certainly not something I would stock my cellar with just yet. So when I heard that Ningxia’s latest export-Château Changyu Moser-was going to be released in London at £39, or ?46, a bottle, my curiosity was piqued.

 

Armed with a map of China’s wine regions and an open mind, I trotted off to the tasting, which by coincidence landed on the vernal equinox-an appropriate time to challenge my taste buds and try something new.

 

China has been producing wine of one sort or another since the early days of the Tang Dynasty (around 625). But its modern incarnation dates back to the late 19th century, when Zhang Bishi, a government officer, established the Changyu winery on the Shandong Peninsula. So good were his wines that “The Wine Opus” notes that they received four gold medals at the 1915 Panama-Pacific International Exposition in San Francisco. Today, the Yantai Changyu Group boasts a collection of wineries dotted around China, complete with uncanny replicas of European châteaux.

 

Château Changyu Moser, an impressive looking property that wouldn’t look out of place on the banks of the Gironde, is one of its best. Their Moser XV, a blend of 90% Cabernet Sauvignon and 10% Merlot, is made in partnership with Austrian wine producer Lenz Moser.

 

“Against what we have tasted out of China before, it is clearly a big leap up,” says Mark Pardoe, Berry Bros. & Rudd Master of Wine. “It’s a novelty value in that it is something interesting coming out of China but it could be the first stirrings of quite an important plan. If they think they can do this well, they will do it and almost nothing can stop them.”

 

The wine in question had none of the off-notes or unusual tastes one often associates with new wine regions. It had a nose of ripe fruit and a recognizable structure. At the back of the throat, it left a rather stringent, bitter flavor-an almost green pepper character. This is probably due to the ripeness of the grapes, which I suspect they will iron out in a few vintages.

 

The three ice-wines the company produces under the Changyu Golden Valley label did more to justify their steep price tag. The aromatics were strong, the fruit was very correct, the aroma profile was as you would expect, but the Gold Diamond fell away a little on the palate.

 

To compete viticulturally with its international counterparts, China still has a long way to go. Indeed, I could list dozens of wines that I would prefer to drink at the same price. But given it’s the first glimpse of what this vast country can produce, it’s a pretty competent effort. Where they go from here will be fascinating to watch.

 

 

——

New Zealand investors acquire Prophet’s Rock winery

 

Source: DBR

05 April 2013

 

A group of New Zealand investors having viticulture interests in the Central Otago region have purchased Prophet’s Rock, a Central Otago-based boutique winery, for an undisclosed amount.

 

With the acquisition, the winery is set for expansion into the offshore markets.

 

Founded in 1999 by Mike and Angela Mulvey, Prophet’s Rock produced its first wine in 2005. The winery is mainly known for its Pinot Noir, Dry Riesling and Pinot Gris wines, which are produced by Prophet’s Rock winemaker Paul Pujol from an estate vineyard located in the Pisa sub-region of Central Otago.

 

Under the acquisition deal, Pujol will become the general manager of the winery, besides handling wine making duties.

 

Pujol said the acquisition creates new opportunities for the winery, as they can now source grapes from an additional Bendigo vineyard in Central Otago.

 

“The investment stemming from the purchase means the winery can fully realize its potential,” Pujol added.

 

“It enables us to bring this second vineyard fully on-stream and gives us the critical mass to expand distribution further into offshore markets.”

 

 

——

German wine stocks at all-time low

 

Source: Harpers

Written by L’re Burger   

04 April 2013

 

German wine stocks are at their lowest ever levels since reunification, with high demand also driving up prices.

 

With an annual production of 9-10 million hl per year, German producers are already selling everything they produce within a year of harvest, said Steffen Schindler, marketing director at the German Wine Institute.

 

Prices rose in 2010 when only 7.1 million hl were produced following a poor harvest, and remained at the same level in 2011 and 2012 despite production returning to normal levels.

 

High domestic and international demand, coupled with a run of good vintages, has allowed German wine producers to maintain their prices, he said.

 

“In the past we used to have two or three bad vintages a decade, and that’s no longer the case. The quality has gone up for even entry-level wines and they’re now starting to fetch the high price these wines deserve.”

 

Schindler said Riesling has succeeded in completely changing the image of German wines, with the wine industry now considering it as Germany’s key premium wine variety. The rise in popularity of Riesling has led to increased interest in other German varieties, he added.

 

Germany is also now the world’s third-biggest producer of Pinot Noir, thanks to ideal growing conditions, the climate, its ancient German terroirs, old bush vines and traditional winemaking skills.

 

“Germany has established itself as Burgundy’s key competitor as a world-class Pinot Noir producer,” said Schindler.

 

Germany now exports up to 1.3 million hl of wine a year and is hopeful of gaining further rises in its export prices.

 

Its key export markets are the US, Netherlands, the UK, Norway and Russia, but there is also an increasing demand for German wines in Hong Kong and China.

 

The German Wine Institute hopes to capitalise on Germany’s strong affiliation with Asian cuisine as part of its ongoing marketing strategy and will be exhibiting at UK consumer shows later this year.

 

 

——

Hugh Johnson cellar to go under the hammer

 

Source: Decanter

by Chris Mercer

Thursday 4 April 2013

First-growths dating back more than 50 years and a large selection of vintage German wines are among a host of bottles to be auctioned from Hugh Johnson’s cellar.

 

Johnson said that it was ‘agony’ deciding which bottles to part with for the auction, which will take place on May 16 at Sworders Stansted Mountfitchet salerooms, in north Essex.

 

The sale, which could raise tens of thousands of pounds, comes as a result of Johnson and his family selling their home of the past 40 years, Saling Hall, also in Essex.

 

The Elizabethan manor house has five cellars, which Johnson has taken delight in filling with top wines from the 20th Century, including some ‘real gems’.

 

A provisional auction list seen by Decanter.com reveals a series of first-growths and other top Bordeaux from down the ages, including Latour and Y’Quem 1945, as well as Latour 1937. There is also at least one bottle of Latour 1961; six bottles of the same vintage recently sold for £28,000 at an auction of part of the UK Government’s wine cellar organised by Christie’s.  

 

There’s a treasure trove of great wines from beyond Bordeaux, including a magnum of Krug Champagne from 1971, three 1830 Malmseys – regarded as a signature vintage – and a large selection of vintage German wines, as well as Burgundies, Spanish and Italian.

 

Highlights from Johnson’s Burgundy collection include two vintages of DRC Grand Echezeaux, two bottles of La Tache – 1988 and 1999 – and a 2000 Leflaive Chevalier Montrachet.

 

‘For me, one of the great joys of life is drinking vintage German wine,’ Johnson told Decanter.com this week. He highlighted a strong showing of Scharzhofbergers, largely from Egon Muller, and an assorted collection of wines from Robert Weil, set to include Riesling and Riesling Eiswein.

 

‘This is the majority of my cellar but by no means the whole thing. There’s nothing [on the list] that I would be ashamed of,’ said the Decanter columnist, author and gardener, who is downsizing his cellar as part of a move to London to be nearer his children and grandchildren.

 

‘We’re trying to be realistic about what we would actually drink in the next few years.’

The present auction list remains in draft form, but is set to have around 318 lots. Precise details of bottle numbers are not yet available for all the wines, but lots are likely to be bottles rather than case loads.   

 

 

——

Bordeaux 2012: Chateau Raymond Lafon not to release 2012

 

Source: Decanter

by Panos Kakaviatos

Thursday 4 April 2013

 

Chateau Raymond Lafon has joined Chateau d’Yquem and Chateau Rieussec in announcing that it will not make a 2012 vintage wine.

 

Lafon, an unclassified Sauternes producer, told decanter.com in the build-up to en primeur that a dry September had prevented development of botrytis – the so-called noble rot – which naturally concentrates grape juices whilst imparting spicy flavours that are characteristic of Sauternes.

 

Chateau co-owner Jean-Pierre Meslier explained that the harvest was too small, describing it as ‘fine and elegant’, but not as ‘concentrated as normal.’

 

The estate harvested with about 114 grams of residual sugar instead of the chateau’s habitual 130 to 140, he said.

 

‘When rain fell later in the month, botrytis spread, but more rain than needed in October compromised pickings.’

 

The best grapes will make ‘an excellent’ second wine: ‘Les Jeunes Pousses de Raymond-Lafon,’ Meslier added.

 

The last vintage that Chateau Raymond Lafon did not produce any wine was 1974.

 

 

——

Bill Koch’s Bad Trip With Counterfeit Wine Is Cautionary Tale For Collectors

 

Source: Forbes

Apr 5th

 

On the evening of Oct. 27, 2005, William I. Koch, the billionaire coal and petroleum magnate, attended an invitation-only, haute cuisine dinner and wine tasting at Daniel Restaurant in New York City, owned by the famed French chef, Daniel Boulud. It was a festive and highly exclusive event, sponsored by Scarsdale, NY-based Zachys Wine Auctions, to promote a sale on the following two days titled, “Over 17,000 Bottles of Greatness.” At the dinner, which according to the invitation would offer “a bird’s eye view of collecting at the high end,” the wine offerings included some of those coming up for auction. Among them were a 1947 Château Latour, and a 1950 Château Latour-wines that could fetch about $10,000 at the sale.

 

Koch didn’t attend the auction but sent a wine consultant, acting on his behalf, to purchase 2,669 bottles of wine at a total cost of $3.7 million. In the process the connoisseur, who is #329 on the Forbes Billionaires list, added to his collection some fine trophy wines that lived up to the catalog’s billing of “the best of the best.” What he didn’t realize at the time was that he had also acquired 24 fakes.

 

One was a magnum (a 1.5-litre bottle) of 1921 Château Petrus for which Koch paid $29,500 at the Zachys auction. It turned out to be a deftly assembled fake, manufactured by a former perfumer who went into the wine counterfeiting business. His recipe: add fragrance and flavor to 1957 Château Petrus; re-bottle and re-cork; then top it off with a capsule and a custom-manufactured label. Voila!

 

That bottle turned out to be a smoking gun in a case on trial in Manhattan federal court in which lawyers and witnesses are duty bound not to drink the evidence. It pits Koch against another avid wine collector: onetime-billionaire Eric Greenberg, who was the consignor of all the wine in the Zachys sale. The catalog did not identify hm, but said he was “incredibly energetic,” and that he amassed his collection “with tremendous thought, energy and great knowledge of wine.” Koch, who could relate to all of this, assumed he was a kindred spirit.

 

Five years into a lawsuit against Greenberg, he has a different opinion. The case, to recover $355,810, has consumed millions in legal fees. For Koch, it’s largely a matter of principle. Greenberg, the testimony shows, had tried first to sell part of his collection through Sotheby’s and Christie’s auction houses. Both turned him down because they doubted the authenticity of some of the items, which came from sources that they recognized as counterfeiters. In the suit, Greenberg contends that he did not know any of the bottles at issue were counterfeit; and that besides, Koch could have determined their authenticity if he had inspected them before the auction.

 

Ultimately the jury will decide, but meanwhile the case is a cautionary tale for other collectors. For many collectibles, whether baseball memorabilia, vintage designer handbags, antiques, or minerals, counterfeits are rampant. Collectors can learn some cheap lessons from the negative-and positive-experiences this billionaire described in his court testimony this week.

 

1. Be passionate. People collect for a variety of reasons. Koch, who collects many other things besides wine, testified, “I collect what I love, what makes me feel good, gives me a great sense of peace and enjoyment. Then I collect things that I think are extremely historical, things that I can look back and say this was part of history.” For example, he owns the only picture of Billy the Kid, Jesse James’s gun and the gun that killed Jesse James.

 

2. Curb your compulsions. Koch rarely sells any of the items in his collections. “My wife calls me a hoarder because I won’t get rid of the stuff,” he said. He has this trait in common with many collectors, and with some people, it can reach extremes. The late psychoanalyst Werner Muensterberger serves up some pathological examples in his book, “Collecting: An Unruly Passion” (Princeton University Press, 1993). They include Thomas Phillipps, a 19th-century British book collector who abandoned his family, then made financing his insatiable habit the main criterion in courting a second wife. Muensterberger, who collected African art, believed that the pursuit of objects helps compensate for deep-seated trauma, anxiety or unfulfilled childhood needs.

 

3. Become an expert. With wine, in particular, it’s enormously difficult to distinguish the genuine from the fake. Interestingly, the most reliable sign is not the taste, which can vary depending on everything from how the wine has been stored, to the chemistry of the drinker’s saliva. Packaging is often a more reliable indicator; experts pay particular attention to the label and the cork.

 

Hiring experts to advise you is the next best thing to becoming one yourself. But hiring a pro who has a financial stake in helping you can be problematic. For example, evidence at the trial showed that the consultant who bid on Koch’s behalf at the Zachys sale was paid based on a percentage of the auction sale price.

 

Although the potential conflict has not been discussed in the testimony, this gave him an incentive to spend money, rather than rule out certain purchases. Neither he nor Koch inspected the wine, although the auction catalog clearly gave them the right to. That could come back to bite them since this detail is a key part of Greenberg’s defense.

 

4. Inquire about provenance. In the most literal sense, this refers to previous owners of whatever you’re buying. With some items, it adds to their cachet-as it did with Andy Warhol’s cookie jars, Jacqueline Kennedy’s simulated pearls and Rusty Staub’s game-worn warm-up jersey. With wine, provenance goes beyond previous owners to include “how the wine was kept over the years,” Koch noted. “That’s highly important because wine can deteriorate if it’s not kept properly.”

 

Likewise, if you find out that the item has passed through the hands of a known counterfeiter; a reseller known to have dealt in counterfeit goods; or a collector who’s been duped, that detracts from provenance. Generally speaking, the rarer the item, the more likely the one you have come across is a fake. The magnum of 1921 Château Petrus is a great example of that.

 

5. Look past the puffery. Auction catalogs, especially high-end ones, are masterfully written. Wine descriptions may include what are called “tasting notes”-highly poetic language by a wine reviewer. It’s there to entice you, but far more important is what the entry says (or doesn’t say) about the condition of what you’re buying. For example, 12 bottles of wine sold together as an auction lot with the description “two water-stained labels, one corroded capsule, one depressed cork,” signals a relatively undesirable (though more affordable) purchase. “Bin-soiled and nicked label” detracts from the value of the wine, while “fully branded cork” adds to it.

 

6. Read the fine print. Not surprisingly, the lawyers have a hand in writing auction catalogs, too. They are responsible for the very unpoetic, prefab language known as boilerplate. It’s written to protect the auction house against lawsuits by consumers. Unless the auctioneer has committed fraud, the legal lingo you find under a heading like, “Conditions of sale and limited warranty,” will generally get off them off the hook. Words to the wise: By agreeing to buy something “as is,” you accept all its warts.

 

 

——

Karin, we wish you well!

 

Grocery Manufacturers Association Appoints Karin Moore Vice President and General Counsel

 

Source: WSWA

Apr 4th

 

Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) President and CEO Pamela G. Bailey today announced the appointment of Karin F.R. Moore as vice president and general counsel.

 

“I am pleased to welcome Karin to the GMA team,” said Bailey.  “Her legal skill and trade association management experience make her the logical choice for this position, and I am certain that she will provide great value to GMA and its member companies as we advance the association’s member-driven agenda.”

 

Ms. Moore joins GMA from the Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of America (WSWA) where she was vice president and co-general counsel.  At WSWA, her responsibilities included coordinating the association’s national litigation strategy, advising on regulatory issues facing wholesalers at both the state and federal levels, and serving on WSWA’s senior management team.

 

Prior to joining WSWA, Moore was a counsel with O’Melveny & Myers’ Antitrust and Criminal Defense practice groups, where she focused on antitrust litigation, civil and criminal antitrust investigations, and federal and state cartel class actions. Prior to O’Melveny, she held a variety of positions with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Bureau of Competition, including counsel to the director and staff attorney with the Anticompetitive Practices Division. She holds a law degree from George Mason University School of Law and is vice-chair of the American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law’s Trade, Sports and Professional Associations Committee.

 

“GMA represents many of the world’s most iconic brands and leading companies. I am honored to have the opportunity to serve the food, beverage and consumer products industry,” said Moore.   “I look forward to working with Pam Bailey, the GMA staff and its members to promote pro-growth policies and advocate for responsible public policy solutions that will allow the industry to continue to provide consumers around the world with safe, healthful, affordable products every day.”

 

Ms. Moore will report to GMA President and CEO Pamela Bailey and will serve as a member of the GMA Senior Leadership Team.  In her new role, she will direct the association’s federal and state litigation activity and provide legal counsel on a host of issues.  She will assume her new post on April 16.

 

 

——

Rite Aid comps down in March

 

Source: RT

By Alaric Dearment

April 4, 2013

 

Same-store sales at Rite Aid decreased 2% in March, including a 3.8% increase in same-store sales on the front end and a 4.5% decrease in pharmacy sales.

 

The 4,621-store chain reported total sales for the month of $1.939 billion, a 2.5% decrease compared with $1.989 billion in March 2012, while same-store prescription count increased 0.3%.

 

The company said that of the 3.8% increase in front-end same-store sales, 3% came from a shift in timing of Easter, which fell on March 31, as opposed to April 8 last year.

 

Investment firm Guggenheim Partners maintained its “Buy” rating on Rite Aid’s stock, saying it expected the company to post strong and above-trend growth in EBITDA in its fourth quarter 2012 earnings, which it will report next Thursday. Guggenheim analyst John Heinbockel noted that script count was below the 1.5% recent trendline, and the reason was unclear but appeared to be due to a weakening of the economy, but the firm expects the meaningful generic drug benefit to GM to persist into the first quarter of fiscal year 2014.

 

 

——

Restaurants poised for spring SSS inflection; upgrade PNRA / EAT

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

Apr 4th

 

Upgrade two more stocks ahead of a potential spring inflection

Based upon improving consumer sentiment, continued job/wage growth, and easier upcoming SSS compares, we upgrade two Restaurant stocks – PNRA and EAT – heading into a potential spring SSS inflection. A primary basis for our more bullish stance is the result of our latest survey of 2,000 consumers. It was completed mid-late February, thus incorporating the impact of the 2% payroll tax hike, higher gas prices, and delayed tax refunds. Despite these headwinds, consumers reported increased optimism and intent to spend, especially among high-income households (our companion report from today is Bullish on the US consumer, especially at the high end).

 

PNRA (CL-Buy): A preeminent growth story that has lagged

We upgrade PNRA to Buy and add the shares to the Americas Conviction List with 30% upside to our $215, 12-month price target. PNRA has a strong unit growth trajectory, SSS are solidly in the mid-single digits, margins are ramping, and FCF deployment is increasingly robust. A spring traffic inflection driven by easier compares, a new ad campaign, and new products may serve as a catalyst after a period of underperformance.

 

EAT (Buy): Solid traffic growth is the last piece of the puzzle

We upgrade EAT to Buy with 17% upside to our $44, 12-month price target. We have appreciated its cost cuts, FCF deployment, and international growth and believe that solid traffic growth may serve as the last key piece of the puzzle. It is accelerating remodels, something that is showing up in our survey as significantly improved brand scores. We believe this along with easier compares and new product launches will serve as a catalyst.

 

DPZ (Buy): Remove from Conviction List after outperformance

We remove DPZ from the Americas Conviction List, as the shares have approached our prior price target. We retain our Buy rating, as we believe DPZ’s long-term fundamentals and growth potential remain intact.

Other key brand-specific findings in our survey

 

SBUX – Starbucks rose to the highest scoring brand in our survey driven by higher “likelihood to recommend” scores and improved value scores.

 

CMG – We believe Chipotle’s “cool factor” may be wearing off as our survey suggests lower conversion scores among younger age cohorts.

We revise select estimates and price targets across coverage.

 

We also revise the P/E-based portion of our price target methodology.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: City considers hiking liquor-drink tax to 15 percent

 

Source: Philly.com

SEAN COLLINS WALSH

April 4, 2013

 

Need a reason to drink? How about improving the futures of Philadelphia’s school kids?

 

Mayor Nutter and City Council are rarely on the same page these days, but the possibility of increasing the “liquor by the drink” tax to help pay for the School Reform Commission request last week for $60 million seems to be gaining traction on both sides.

 

City Council President Darrell Clarke has pledged support for increasing the tax, which now adds 10 percent to your bar tab (on top of the sales tax) and sends it to the schools. Nutter said Thursday that it’s an option his administration is considering.

 

In 1994, then-Councilman Nutter voted in favor of creating the tax, which now brings in more than $45 million per year.

 

“President Clarke and I have talked about that and I am certainly interested in that kind of proposal, but my track record on that one is pretty clear,” Nutter said. The 1994 bill “was a tough vote for a lot of folks but I thought it was the right thing to do then and it’s certainly something that we should explore now.”

 

Clarke spokeswoman Jane Roh wrote in an email that the Council president “supports increasing this tax to bolster an annualized revenue stream for the schools.”

 

Pat Conway, president of the Pennsylvania Restaurant and Lodging Association, said that while businesses don’t like the tax, it’s the customers who usually absorb its cost.

 

“It would be a tough pill to swallow for restaurants and taverns and for the entire hospitality industry, but it’s actually more of a consumer issue,” Conway said.

 

The possibility of increasing the tax by half (to 15 percent per drink) has been floated. That’s no silver bullet cocktail shaker for fully funding the schools’ request, so Council and the mayor would have to find money in other places to reach the $60 million the schools say they need to plug their enormous budget gap.

 

Nutter supports funding the request but has been elusive as to how he wants to get that done. On Thursday he addressed criticism that his administration hasn’t yet presented a plan, saying he wants to first develop one with Council.

 

“We don’t have a plan today and we certainly don’t have all the answers today, and we don’t have to have a plan and all the answers today. Our budget process, at least under the Charter, is completed by the end of May,” he said.

 

Some in Council, including Clarke, have not committed to providing the full $60 million, arguing that after two years of city property-tax hikes for the schools, it’s Harisburg’s turn.

 

Nutter, however, said Thursday he thinks Philly needs to show its commitment first to get more money out of the state.

 

“It would put us at that much worse of a situation from a discussion or negotiation standpoint to somehow seek additional funding from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania . . . while some might suggest that the city would not be putting dollars on the table,” he siad. “I have to reject that kind of strategy.”

 

 

——

Kentucky: Beshear signs bill lifting Prohibition-era ban

 

Source: WDRB

Apr 04, 2013

 

Gov. Steve Beshear has signed legislation lifting a Prohibition-era ban on the sale of alcohol at restaurants, bars and retail stores on Election Day.

 

The House and Senate voted overwhelmingly last month to allow alcohol sales during hours that polls are open.

 

Kentucky and South Carolina are the only two states that have such bans in place. In the past five years, similar bans have been lifted in Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Utah and West Virginia.

 

Beshear signed the Kentucky legislation on Thursday.

 

Election Day alcohol was one of a handful of provisions in the legislation. Beshear touted the legislation Thursday as a measure that modernizes the state’s liquor laws and makes it easier for the alcoholic beverage industry to do business in Kentucky.

 

Liquor Industry News 4-3-13

April 3, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Wednesday April 3rd 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic FRUIT Day.

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

 

Diageo’s Rs 11,000-cr United Spirits deal in trouble over beleaguered Vijay Mallya

 

Source: Indian Express

Wed Apr 03 2013

 

With the Bombay High Court allowing lenders to sell the shares pledged by Vijay Mallya’s United Breweries Holdings (UBHL) as well as other group firms, doubts have risen over the Rs 11,000-crore deal structured by the billionaire in November 2012 with the world’s largest spirits maker, Diageo, to sell a stake in United Spirits (USL).

 

With lenders – who had been given the shares as collateral for loans given to Kingfisher Airlines – free to sell and several having already sold the shares in the market, Mallya may not be left with enough shares to offer to Diageo in a three-tier transaction.

 

While a UB Group spokesperson declined to comment, Diageo could not be contacted immediately for its response over the latest development.

 

As per the deal, of the 27.4 per cent stake that Diageo was to acquire in the first stage, 19.3 per cent was by direct stake from UBHL and certain USL subsidiaries and group trusts.

 

However, with 97.94 per cent shares (35.2 million shares) of Mallya’s 28.1 per cent (35.97 million shares) holding in USL being pledged with lenders and with them starting to sell the shares in the market, he may not not be left with any to offer to Diageo.

 

At Tuesday’s closing price, the pledged shares are worth Rs 6,552 crore.

 

The only option before him was some relief from the Bombay High Court, which did not come his way on Tuesday. The court refused to grant interim relief to UBHL for a stay on the sale of pledged shares in USL and Mangalore Chemicals and Fertilizers by the State Bank of India-led consortium of banks.

 

The consortium had initiated the sale of shares of USL that were pledged by UBHL as security against the lending of over Rs 7,000 crore to Kingfisher Airlines.

 

In a hardening of stance after the court refused any relief to Mallya, State Bank of India chairman Pratip Chaudhuri told Bloomberg that it will seize collateral pledged by the company.

 

“The bank has called up the loan and has asked the company to repay,” Chaudhuri said. “We will invoke all the guarantees and securities that we hold including shares of United Spirits that is pledged as collateral and personal assets of the people who have given the guarantee,” he added.

 

While the company had pledged a total of 35.2 million shares of USL with various entities, the consortium of 18 banks led by SBI have 2.6 million shares as collateral with them. They have already sold 7,30,000 shares of USL in three tranches as on Tuesday.

 

It remains to be seen as to how Diageo, which had plans to take its stake eventually to 53.4 per cent, completes the transaction.

 

 

——

AB InBev Seeks Payment From CVC

 

Source: WSJ

By DANA CIMILLUCA

Apr 2nd

 

An unusual legal spat has surfaced over Anheuser-Busch InBev NV’s BUD +0.83% sale of an Eastern European beer company to buyout firm CVC Capital Partners at the height of the financial crisis in 2009.

 

The previously unreported dispute, disclosed in an annual filing AB InBev made last week with the Securities and Exchange Commission, centers on a payment the Budweiser beer maker says it is owed based on CVC’s return on the investment, which it has since sold.

 

CVC declined to comment, but based on the filing, it argues it doesn’t owe any such payment. The dispute is headed to court.

 

The dust-up involves the sale in December 2009 of the brewing giant’s operations in a handful of countries, including Hungary, Romania and the Czech Republic, to CVC for cash and other consideration totaling $2.2 billion. At the time, AB InBev was scrambling to raise cash to pay down debt it assumed in the massive purchase of Anheuser-Busch the prior year, without having to sell its depressed shares.

 

As part of that deal, ABI secured what is known as a Contingent Value Right, or CVR-a way of rewarding a seller should the business in question perform well following the deal-pegged to CVC’s return on the investment.

 

Last June, CVC sold the business, then known as StarBev, to Molson Coors Brewing Co. TAP +0.73% for ?2.65 billion ($3.4 billion). That deal included ?500 million of convertible debt issued to CVC, which was to enable them to “participate in future upside” in the business, according to a news release at the time. According to last week’s filing, AB InBev believes the terms of that deal triggered an obligation on CVC’s part to make an additional payment to AB InBev.

 

“CVC in October issued proceedings against us in the English Commercial Court in relation to the CVR Agreement and sought a declaration that the return it received following the sale to Molson did not trigger our right to payment,” the filing reads. In it, AB InBev didn’t go into detail on how much money is at stake, other than to say “The amount we are able to recover will depend on discovery and calculation criteria to be explored at trial.”

 

AB InBev said in a statement it “will defend its rights to make sure it receives what it is entitled to under the calculations to be made under the CVR.”

 

CVC declined to comment.

 

CVC is one of the biggest private-equity firms, raising a ?10.8 billion European fund in 2008. It holds such high-profile assets as the Formula One racing business and BJ’s Wholesale Club of the U.S. It is rare for such a firm to get into a public spat with a big industry player like AB InBev; global blue-chip corporations are a major source of deals for buyout shops, as both StarBev transactions show. For CVC, openly quarreling with one of them could risk having a chilling effect on the willingness of others to enter into deals with the buyout fund operator.

 

 

——

Quorn Owner Acquires Taste For Whisky Deal

 

Investor in meat-free food substitute and flagship West End theatres emerges as bidder for Scotch producer, Sky News understands.

 

Source: Sky News

By Mark Kleinman, City Editor

02 April 2013

 

The investment group which owns the meat-free food range Quorn is in talks to take control of one of Britain’s biggest independent whisky distillers.

 

I understand that Exponent Private Equity is the mystery party which has been holding discussions about a takeover of the Loch Lomond Distillery Company.

 

A deal would value Loch Lomond at tens of millions of pounds, although the exact price tag is unclear.

 

Exponent is understood to be the front-runner to acquire Loch Lomond, although other prospective buyers are also in the frame, according to people familiar with the situation.

 

Sky News reported the potential takeover of Loch Lomond in February.

 

Exponent, which may acquire Loch Lomond as part of a wider consortium of investors, bought Quorn Foods in 2011, and has broad exposure to other consumer-facing companies.

 

The private equity group is also a shareholder in Ambassador Theatre Group, HSS, the tool-hire company, and Radley, the premium handbag manufacturer.

 

If a deal is agreed, it would end the independence of one of Scotland’s oldest whisky producers. The family of Sandy Bulloch, Loch Lomond’s current chairman, traces its interest in the industry back to 1842, when Gabriel Bulloch partnered JH Dewar in a Scotch wholesaling business in Glasgow, according to the company’s website.

 

Loch Lomond branched out into retail outlets as well as becoming one of the largest independent bottlers of spirits in Scotland. It owns the Glen’s vodka brand, which it says is the second-biggest seller in the UK, as well as a bottling plant called Glen Catrine Bonded Warehouse Company.

 

Media reports last year said that the company recorded a modest rise in turnover from £17.83m to £18.3m in the year to March 31, 2011.

 

Accounts filed at Companies House show that Loch Lomond made a pre-tax loss of nearly £200,000 during the following 12-month period, with which directors said they were “happy” despite “a demanding year”.

 

Among the claims that Loch Lomond makes about itself is that it is the second-largest family-owned distillery in Scotland and that it is the only distillery in Scotland that produces both grain and malt whisky on the same site.

 

Its average annual production is 10 million litres of grain alcohol and 2.5 million litres of malt alcohol, the equivalent of 43 million standard bottles of whisky every year.

 

Loch Lomond is one of the few prominent whisky producers not to count itself among the members of the industry body, the Scotch Whisky Association.

 

Exponent declined to comment.

 

 

——

Scotch exports hit by falling demand (Additional Coverage)

 

Source: FT

By Hannah Kuchler

Apr 2nd

 

Falling sales of Scotch to France and Spain led to a drop in the total volume of the whisky exported last year, which stalled after more than a decade of growth fuelled by its popularity in emerging markets.

 

The industry – which makes up three-quarters of Scotland’s food and drink exports and a quarter of the UK’s – suffered a 5 per cent decline in exports by number of units sold in 2012, according to the Scotch Whisky Association.

 

Compared with 2011 data, exports to France, by far the largest European consumer of the drink, dropped by 25 per cent after a new tax was introduced and shipments to Spain fell 20 per cent as the economic crisis dampened spirits.

 

But the value of exports edged up 1 per cent to reach £4.3bn – 87 per cent more than 10 years ago – as drinkers opted for more premium bottles. In 2012, shipments to India rose 5 per cent in volume, and 17 per cent in value.

 

 

——

Liquor Sales in Russia Drop 9% in February

 

Source: RIA Novosti

Vladimir Astapkovich

02/04/2013

 

Sales of vodka and other spirits in Russia dropped almost 9 percent in February year on year to 113 million liters, the Federal Statistics Service (Rosstat) said in a report on Tuesday.

 

Beer sales declined less than 1 percent in February compared to the same period last year, to some 730 million liters.

 

Wine sales dropped 4.5 percent year on year in the reporting period to 73 million liters, following 7 percent growth in January. Overall, wine sales increased by 5 percent in the first two months of 2013 compared to the same period in 2012.

 

Sales of sparkling wine grew 5 percent in February to 22 million liters.

 

Sales of low-alcohol drinks (defined as those containing less than 9 percent alcohol by volume) fell almost 12 percent year on year in the first two months of 2013, to 42 million liters.

 

 

——

Australia: Lion causes uproar with draught beer at home product

 

Source: TheShout

By James Atkinson

03/04/2013

 

Lion will forge ahead with Tap King, its controversial new beer dispenser that enables drinkers to enjoy six beers from the brewer’s range on draught in the comfort of home.

 

Lion has been in lengthy consultation with the hotel industry over the Tap King system, which irate publicans argue gives drinkers another reason to stay at home, where they can already watch sport, place bets and smoke freely.

 

Lion’s position however is that Tap King “is designed to give beer drinkers more choice when getting out to the pub isn’t an option and they are enjoying a beer at home”.

 

“Our research indicates that 69 per cent of all drinking occasions take place in the home and Tap King has been specifically designed for those occasions,” a Lion spokesperson told TheShout.

 

“Tap King won’t change the fact that Australians love getting out to pubs and clubs for a beer with mates, and we certainly don’t want it to. Pubs and clubs are an essential part of a vibrant, sociable community and we continue to see on-premise as an important channel for our business.”

 

Documents obtained by TheShout reveal that the dispense head (pictured above) would have a retail price of $32.99, with 3.2 litre PET bottle refills priced at between $18.99 and $27.99 each for the available beers – XXXX Gold, Tooheys New, Tooheys Extra Dry, Hahn Super Dry, James Boag’s Premium and James Squire Golden Ale.

 

Lion professes that retailers’ margins on the refills, which will also come in twin packs, will range between 16.5 per cent and 27.5 per cent, depending on the beer.

 

But retailers who have spoken with TheShout highly doubt these margins will be retained, with prices to inevitably come down when the product is discounted by the chains.

 

‘A sad day for pubs’

 

Australian Hotels Association national CEO Des Crowe told TheShout: “There is some concern amongst the AHA membership that this product undermines draught beer served in hotels by encouraging customers to stay home with a cheaper product.”

 

“Even as packaged beer has become increasingly affordable through retail outlets, pubs have maintained the advantage that the draught beer experience could not be replicated at home. This is now under some threat,” he said.

 

Sydney publican Glen Stanford told TheShout it is a “sad day” for the on-premise.

 

“Both the on and off-premise will agree that draught beer is better than packaged beer. The one thing that we’ve always been able to do is provide a good beer that you couldn’t get at home,” he said.

 

“Now they’re taking that advantage away from us and I think that’s sad.”

 

But fellow hotelier Will Ryan, of Sydney’s Harold Park Hotel, said any home draught beer product will not be able to compete with the food and beverage offering of his pub, which has 16 different draught beers on tap.

 

“We’ve seen what’s happened with packaged beer over the last 20 years where it’s become so cheap that people will stay at home and drink before they go out. But they’ll still come to the pub for the atmosphere, the service, the camaraderie,” he said.

 

 

——

Beverage Alcohol Resource’s DRINKSKOOL.com Is Now in Session!

 

Online Cocktail Teaching Program Designed to Make Everyone a Better Bartender

 

Source: Savona Communications

April 3, 2013

 

Award-winning beverage industry icons Dale DeGroff, Doug Frost, Steve Olson, F. Paul Pacult, Andy Seymour and David Wondrich, the founding members of legendary Beverage Alcohol Resource® LLC (BAR), are delighted to announce that DrinkSkool, their consumer-oriented, on-line teaching program, is now operational. DrinkSkool.com is BAR’s engaging, enlightening and entertaining on-line spirits and mixology education program that brings the expertise of six of the world’s foremost spirits and cocktail professionals into easily digested form.

 

Best of all, DrinkSkool tuition is FREE!

 

Says BAR® partner Doug Frost, “DrinkSkool is the cutting-edge, step-by-step on-line resource for cocktail creation and mixology methods. We designed and constructed DrinkSkool in such an approachable way that virtually anyone can become an accomplished maven of spirits and cocktails.even Dale and Paul.”

 

Drinkskool is laid out in 10 Lessons, starting with Lesson One: Mixology through to Lesson Ten: Preparing for the Certified Drinks Expert Examination. Here are five key benefits that anyone – from average consumers of beverage alcohol to industry professionals – can gain by taking DrinkSkool’s 10 Lessons:

 

.         Watch BAR Master Ryan Maybee (and IMBIBE Magazine’s Mixologist of the Year) craft the most important cocktails, cocktails everyone wants to be able to make

 

.         Discover how professionals taste and evaluate spirits and cocktails for balance and quality in Lesson Seven

 

.         Learn critical bartending techniques and tricks (how to muddle mint, flame an orange peel and more) from BAR partner Andy Seymour

 

.         Understand what differentiates a Blended Malt Scotch from a Single Malt Scotch; an Irish Whisky from a Japanese whisky; and an Armagnac from a Cognac in Lesson Five

 

.         Access an ever-expanding bank of new and classic cocktail recipes

 

Taking part in BAR’s DrinkSkool is easy: simply log onto www.DrinkSkool.com. Once there, follow the Lessons, view the videos, learn the recipes and become a member of an expanding community of cocktail lovers and aficionados.  

 

Drinkskool Lessons include everything you need to know to become a pro behind the bar (even if that’s your own home bar):

1.       Mixology

2.       Recipes

3.       How People Make Distilled Spirits

4.       White Spirits

5.       Brown Spirits

6.       Liqueurs

7.       Tasting Spirits and Cocktails

8.       Advanced Mixology

9.       How to Judge a Bar

10.     Preparing for the Certified Drinks Expert Examination

 

And get ready to join the BAR guys for DrinkSkool’s next great iteration: THE CERTIFIED DRINKS EXPERT EXAMS! Coming later in 2013, the DrinkSkool exams that will earn you the right to call yourself a Certified DrinkSkool Expert!

 

ABOUT BEVERAGE ALCOHOL RESOURCE

BAR was conceived in March 2005 over drinks in San Francisco. BAR became a formal and legal entity in July 2006 and today is globally looked upon as the platinum standard of spirits and mixology instruction. The six founding members are Dale DeGroff, Doug Frost, Steve Olson, F. Paul Pacult, Andy Seymour and David Wondrich.

 

 

——

US criticizes EU restrictions on wine labels

 

Source: France 24

Apr 2nd

 

The United States on Monday criticized the European Union’s restrictions on wine labeling, saying they hinder US wine exports to the 27-nation bloc.

 

The US Trade Representative’s office said the EU’s policy of seeking exclusive use of so-called traditional terms such as tawny, ruby, reserve, classic, and chateau on wine labels had an undesirable effect.

 

“The EU’s regulation of traditional terms severely restricts the ability of non-EU wine producers to use common or descriptive and commercially valuable terms to describe their products sold in the EU,” the USTR said in a report on trade barriers.

 

According to the report, the EU may allow third-country producers to use the traditional terms if their governments forge an agreement with the EU regulating use of the terms in their markets.

 

While no US shipments have been blocked to the EU, the USTR said, “US industry reports that the regulation has deterred exporters from seeking to enter the EU market.”

 

The report came as the US and the EU prepared to begin negotiations this year on an ambitious trade and investment partnership that would create the world’s largest free-trade area.

 

The USTR said it was “problematic” that the EU was trying to expand the list of the so-called traditional terms to include additional “commercially valuable terms” that lack a common definition across all EU member states.

 

Noting that the EU maintained its policy is aimed at avoiding the misuse of terms that may confuse customers, the US trade office said the terms have been used “without incident” on US wines in the EU market for many years.

 

The EU had allowed the use of the terms by other countries, including Chile, South Africa, Canada, and Australia, it said.

 

According to the USTR, the US this year will continue to work with US wine exporters on how to resolve the wine labeling issues with EU officials at the World Trade Organization and in bilateral meetings.

 

 

——

China Foods to buy wineries in Australia, US

 

Source: China Daily

By Zhou Siyu

April 2nd

 

China Foods Ltd – the Hong Kong-listed consumer food arm of Cofco, the country’s largest State-owned food conglomerate – will buy two or three wineries in Australia and the United States, in a bid to expand its wine sales while fending off competition from surging wine imports.

 

The acquisitions, aimed at locally renowned brands, will be worth at least $20 million and are expected to be completed within the next two years, China Foods’ Managing Director Luan Xiuju said at a news conference in Beijing on Monday.

 

“I’ve visited the wineries. Now everything depends on the progress of our talks with them,” she said.

 

Luan also said the company is in talks with two global leading wine dealers to become their exclusive brand representative and distributor in China.

 

The company owns two overseas wineries: Chateau Viaud in Bordeaux, France, and the Bisquert winery in Chile. Sales from its wine import business were less than $15 million last year.

 

The company said the recent moves are intended to compete with foreign wine suppliers, which have eroded the market shares of domestic wine producers in the Chinese market in the last few years.

 

China’s wine imports have seen a significant increase over the last seven years. The amount surged from fewer than 400 million liters in 2004 to 1,400 million liters in 2011, according to a report by Rabobank, making the country an attractive market for wine dealers across the world.

 

China Foods to buy wineries in Australia, US

 

Among foreign suppliers, France continued to dominate China’s wine market in 2012. From June 2011 to July 2012, China’s imports of Bordeaux wine reached 63 million liters, industry data showed.

 

The vast amount of imported wine has seriously affected the sales of domestic producers.

 

Yantai Changyu Pioneer Wine Co Ltd saw a dramatic decline in its sales of premium wines and reported an 11.1 percent fall in net profit to 1.7 billion yuan ($273 million) for 2012.

 

China Foods’ wine sales, which account for a major part of its revenue, were also affected. The company’s net profit slumped 41 percent from 646 million Hong Kong dollars ($83 million) to 382 million HK dollars.

 

Apart from further overseas expansion, China Foods said it also plans to boost sales by launching new entry-level products.

 

“The new products will be priced between 50 and 100 yuan, to make them affordable to common consumers. This is also in line with the relatively slower economic growth this year,” said Luan.

 

Meanwhile, analysts cheered the planned acquisitions.

 

“Overseas investments will help the company gain more expertise as well as experience in wine production and winery management,” said Ma Wenfeng, a senior analyst at Beijing Orient Agribusiness Consultant.

 

“China’s market is growing very fast but is still less familiar with the wine culture than Western countries. The most important thing right now is to bring wine into the households as well as to people’s daily life,” Ma added.

 

 

——

Champagne shipments up +8.3% in January, growth outside of France

  

Source: Barclay’s

Apr 2nd

 

CIVC global shipments grew by -8.3% in January 2013, an improvement from the -8.8% reported in December. This comes on an easy comparable of -13.1% in January 2012 and we note that the month accounts for less than 5% of annual shipments. France was down by -4.4% on an easy comparable (-13.2% in January 2012). European volumes were up by 23.9%, compared to -19.6% a year before. Shipments to other countries (19% of volumes) grew by 26% (-4.3% in January 2012).

We reiterate our negative stance on the champagne sector. With austerity measures increasing in many of the core European markets and with an additional 1,700 kilo per hectare of grape supply due to hit the market (a 25% increase in supply on 2011 following the yield restrictions imposed by the industry in 2009), category pricing appears vulnerable. We believe the risks remain skewed to the downside. We maintain our UW ratings on Laurent-Perrier and Lanson-BCC, and EW rating on Vranken-Pommery. Our preferred pick in the European Beverages space remains Pernod Ricard (OW, PT EUR 105) given its superior emerging market, Brown Spirits exposure.

 

 

——

Jackson Family Wines’ Valley of the Sun Fine Wines Distributorship and Southern Wine & Spirits of Arizona’s Fine Wine Division, Vintage Selections, Align in Arizona

 

Source: BusinessWire

April 02, 2013

 

Wayne E. Chaplin, President & Chief Operating Officer, Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. (Southern)-the nation’s leading wine and spirits distributor-announced today that Jackson Family Wines’ (JFW) Valley of the Sun Fine Wines wholesaler (VOS) has aligned with the fine wine arm of Southern Wine & Spirits of Arizona (SWS-AZ). VOS is a division of Regal Wine Company, a subsidiary of JFW-one of America’s premiere family-owned, super premium wineries. The newly-formed, collaborative, luxury portfolio-selling division will be called VOS-Vintage Fine Wines and Spirits.

 

“I truly look forward to working with JFW in Arizona-and beyond-in the years ahead. They share the strategic vision, approach and values that will keep us on the same page as we successfully steward their leading portfolio of premium and super premium brands long into the future.”

 

Chaplin, commenting on this new luxury division within SWS-AZ, said, “We are thrilled to expand our relationship with Jackson Family Wines in Arizona. Like us, they are a family-owned and -run company with impressive leadership who take a future-focused view of this business. Their model of premiumization is right in line with Southern’s long-term fine wine strategy.”

 

Building on Chaplin’s comments, JFW President Rick Tigner added, “We at Jackson Family Wines are a leading producer, and Southern the leading distributor, of fine wine in the United States. We are excited to align with their team in Arizona and enable the synergies evoked by bringing our two powerhouse companies together.”

 

Brad Vassar, Southern’s Executive Vice President & General Manager, remarked, “I truly look forward to working with JFW in Arizona-and beyond-in the years ahead. They share the strategic vision, approach and values that will keep us on the same page as we successfully steward their leading portfolio of premium and super premium brands long into the future.”

 

Michael Jahn, Executive Vice President, General Manager for Arizona and New Mexico, offered, “The culture of Southern has always been infused and shaped by our fine wine business. Bringing these two leading fine-wine companies together-with all their resident capabilities-is no doubt a powerful formula for success. I know we at SWS-AZ value the resources and skill sets that the Valley of the Sun organization will bring to the relationship.”

 

This new organization will be in place in May 2013.

 

 

——

Bordeaux 2012: ‘No need to wait’ says Moueix as La Fleur Petrus, Trotanoy and Belair Monange released

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Tuesday 2 April 2013

 

JP Moueix sets the early tone ahead of en primeur tasting week by releasing their full 2012 range.

 

Etablissements JP Moueix, owners of leading Right Bank estates Chateaux La Fleur Pétrus, Trotanoy and Belair Monange, has released its full range of 2012 wines a week before en primeur with prices down by an average 15%.

 

Edouard Moueix, director of JP Moueix alongside his father Christian Moueix, told Decanter.com that their strategy is always to release the wines first in Belgium, with the UK release planned for the week following the official en primeur tasting week.

 

‘In some years, we will only release the mid-range chateaux at this point, but in 2012 we feel that there is no need to wait. This is a vintage for buying and selling, and to create a sense of excitement in the wines, we felt this made sense.’

 

Moueix said prices are between 10% and 15% down from last year. ‘We have decreased the prices not because of the quality of the wine, but because of the situation of the market.’

 

As en primeur tasting week approaches, there has been a general call for 2012 prices to see a minimum 20% drop on last year. First Growths, according to several sources in Bordeaux, are expected to come out early in the campaign, with some sources suggesting a drop of 30% on last year’s prices is realistic.

 

‘There is no need to wait for Parker scores in a difficult year,’ one leading broker told Decanter.com this week, ‘and there is not a lot of money around anyway, so it’s best to go early at a good price.’

 

Patrick Bernard, of négociants Millésima, appealed to a group of chateaux owners at his retasting of the 2011 wines last month with the words, ‘2011 had a taste that the consumers don’t like… It was too expensive. 2012 gives you the chance to use the same clairvoyance as you did in 2008. You diagnosed the problem then, please do it again.’

 

Alongside Moueix, the RendezVous Médoc chateaux, including 13 Médoc estates, such as Arsac, Cambon La Pelouse and Caronne Ste Gemme, will again release their wines through Les Grands Crus brokerage firm, in the week beginning April 15.

 

 

——

Willamette Valley Vineyards Posts a Profit for 2012

 

Source: SacBee

By Willamette Valley Vineyards

Mar. 29, 2013

 

Willamette Valley Vineyards (NASDAQ:WVVI), a leading Oregon producer of Pinot Noir, generated net profits of $1,202,849 or $0.25 per share for 2012, up from $857,755 or $0.18 per share for 2011, representing a $345,094 or 40.2% increase in net profits.

 

The Company produced revenues of $12,527,268 and $12,235,986 in the years 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $291,282 or 2.4%.  The primary reasons for this increase are increased retail sales, partially offset by decreases in out-of-state sales to distributors.  Gross profit margin was 58.1% and 57.0% for 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $5,075,052 and $4,548,125 for the years 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $526,927 or 11.6%.  This increase was primarily the result of the absorption of costs from activities that had previously been shared by the in-state distribution activities, which were discontinued during 2012.

 

During 2012, the company completed the wind-down of all in-state self-distribution activities.  Losses from these discontinued operations before taxes were $242,878 and $919,961 for the years 2012 and 2011, respectively, a reduction of $677,083 or 73.6%.

 

Jim Bernau, Founder and President of the winery said, “We are very encouraged by the positive performance of our wines in 2012.  We believe our tradition of creating elegant, classic Oregon Pinot Noir is getting noticed.  We hope to continue to grow our direct-to-consumer sales programs by expanding the hospitality services at our winery.”

 

Willamette Valley Vineyards, Inc. is headquartered at its Estate Vineyard near Salem, Oregon.  The Company’s common stock is traded on NASDAQ (WVVI).

 

 

——

Servant Disses Ex-Boss In Billionaire Wine Fraud Trial

 

Source: Forbes

Apr 2nd

 

In what could have been a scene out of Downton Abbey, a former servant of onetime-billionaire Eric Greenberg testified in Manhattan federal court today that his ex-boss was a tyrant, and admitted to sending an email in which he called him an —hole.

 

Such is the evidence being uncorked as part of a wine fraud trial brought against Greenberg by William I. Koch, the coal and petroleum magnate who is worth an estimated $4 billion and is #329 on the Forbes Billionaires list. His suit, for about $320,000, has been winding its way through the legal system for more than five years, certainly consuming millions in legal fees. It stems from the purchase of 36 bottles of wine at two separate sales conducted by Zachy’s Wine Auctions in December 2004 in October 2005.

 

Koch alleges that these bottles are counterfeit and that Greenberg was aware of this when he consigned them. Zachy’s was originally named in the lawsuit, but the case against them was dismissed in January 2011.

 

Greenberg contends that he did not know any of the bottles at issue were counterfeit; and that Koch could have determined their authenticity if he had inspected them before the auction.

 

Jaime J. Cortes, who worked for Greenberg for four years as his personal chef and manager of his Ross, Calif. home, learned about the case as a result of an article in Wine Spectator magazine, and contacted Koch’s handlers offering to help. There is an issue about whether this would violate a 2001 confidentiality agreement that is part of the court record but which, according to his testimony, he does not remember signing. Koch is not compensating him for being a witness, but has agreed to pay his legal expenses “If Mr. Greenberg comes after me,” he explained today on the witness stand.

 

The day included videotaped clippings of a deposition by Serena Sutcliffe, a wine expert from Sotheby’s auction house who visited Greenberg’s wine cellar in April 2002. One of the eight jurors slept through most of her monotone testimony, based on which the two sides reach opposite conclusions about whether she warned Greenberg that some of his wines were counterfeit. Among the pricey bottles discussed today were a 1950 Chateau LaFleur appraised at $10,000 to $15,000-a sum that might have been a significant portion of some jurors’ annual income.

 

They seemed most attentive to Cortes, who turned to them often during his testimony, and held up a plastic water bottle to demonstrate the position of bottles on the shelves in Greenberg’s cellar. He described how, in the course of his tenure there, he fielded frequent phone calls from wine merchants, ran the house “like the Ritz-Carlton” and worked long hours in what he referred to repeatedly as a “holding pen” listing new wine acquisitions on notepads.

 

Following Sutcliffe’s visit, he recalls, Greenberg was very upset about the possibility that some of his wines were counterfeit. With an appraiser’s help, he identified 108 bottles with questionable authenticity, and traced those to Royal Wine Merchants. They entered into a settlement around February 2004.

 

Greenberg would not tell Cortes how much money he got back, but did say that the settlement permitted him to keep the wine. When Cortes asked for a bottle as a trophy, Greenberg refused and said, “What they did to me, I’m going to do to someone else.” At issue in the trial is whether Greenberg consigned some of these bottles to Zachy’s.

 

At the trial today, Cortes told a smooth narrative about what happened next: Greenberg announced that he was selling some wine to fund a company he was starting, and because he had more than he could drink. Cortes packed bottles to be shipped for auction, and when Greenberg had multiples of the same wine, he told him to “send the shittiest bottle.” The story, which seemed polished and well-rehearsed, conflicted in spots with clips from his more tentative videotaped deposition of 2010, projected during cross examination.

 

During the cross-examination, Frank C. Cialone, one of Greenberg’s team of lawyers, also tried to discredit Cortes as a spurned employee. When Cortes moved on to a new job in November 2004, Greenberg paid him a $2,500 bonus, instead of the $25,000 he originally promised.

 

Greenberg, who was called as a witness yesterday by the Koch team, sat all day today at his counsel’s table, dressed in a blue Edwardian-cut suit, white shirt and red tie. He leaned forward with a pained look on his face as he listened to Cortes’s testimony.

 

On the opposite side of the courtroom sat Koch in pinstripes, awaiting his turn on the witness stand. No stranger to wine fraud cases, he sued Christie’s in 2005 for selling him wine that allegedly belonged to Thomas Jefferson. The case was dismissed because it was filed too late.

 

 

——

Paolo Basso crowned world’s best sommelier

 

Source: Decanter

by John Stimpfig

Tuesday 2 April 2013

 

Paolo Basso has beaten off competition from 53 other hopefuls to be named Best Sommelier in the World.

 

The 47-year-old Swiss-Italian was crowned champion at the 14th finals held by Association de la Sommelerie Internationale in Japan. The global contest takes place every three years.

 

Veronique Rivest of Canada and Aristide Spies from Belgium were named as runners-up to Basso, making Rivest the first woman to achieve a top three finish.

 

Only 12 sommeliers made it through to the semi-finals, including the UK’s Eric Zwiebel, of the Summer Lodge in Dorset, and Turkey’s Isa Bal, of the Fat Duck.

 

‘It was very hard and only gets tougher and more pressurised when you get to the finals,’ said a delighted Basso, who was presented with silver jeroboam engraved with his name for winning the three-day event.

 

Basso received his trophy from Benoit Gouez, chef de cave of Moet Hennessy, alongside his wife and daughter in front of a 4,000-strong audience and live on Japanese television.

 

‘It is a very important moment for me,’ he said. ‘I would like to thank first of all my family because they allowed me the time for the hard training.’

 

Basso, who lifted the European Sommelier title three years ago, was runner-up in the world competition in 2000, 2007 and 2010, missing out to Gerard Basset in the last final.

 

Having trained at the Swiss Sommelier Association School, Basso currently lectures on wine, runs a consulting business named Ceresio Vini and is a Judge at the Decanter World Wine Awards. He is also wine director of Conca Bella restaurant near Lake Como in northern Italy.

 

He plans to spend a few days holiday with his family in Japan, following his win.

 

 

——

GLAZER’S, INC. APPOINTS SEAN ECKHARDT SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT SALES, DMH DIVISION, LOUISIANA

 

Source: Glazer’s

Apr 2nd

 

Glazer’s today announces that Sean Eckhardt is appointed as Senior Vice President of Sales, DMH Division, Louisiana. Eckhardt will lead the sales function for the Louisiana DMH portfolio, be responsible for topline performance, drive customer relationships, and enhance value-added services. Eckhardt will report to Pete Carr, Glazer’s Executive Vice President, DMH. The appointment is effective April 15, 2013.

 

Eckhardt’s most recent position was Vice President Sales with Florida Distributing Company. Prior to that he held various positions with the Schenck Company and also worked with Copeland’s Restaurants and the Baton Rouge Beer Agency.

 

Eckhardt holds a BS and a MS from Louisiana State University.

 

Pete Carr states, “Sean brings a wealth of experience to this key position in Louisiana. His distribution experience, along with the relationships he has built from his prior years in Louisiana, is well suited to executing the aggressive business plans we have for DMH Louisiana.”

 

 

——

New Vice-President of Sales at Corby Distilleries

 

Source: CNW

April 2, 2013

 

Corby Distilleries Limited is pleased to announce the following move, effective as of July 1, 2013:

 

Andy Alexander, currently Vice-President of Sales at Corby Distilleries, has decided to retire from this position on July 1, 2013 after 13 years with the company and will leave Corby August 1 2013. “Andy has been an instrumental part of the success of Corby in the Canadian market and a hugely valued member of our Executive team, so while it was difficult for me to accept his decision, I have of course respected it,” said Patrick O’Driscoll, Corby’s Chief Executive Officer.

 

Andy will be replaced by Stéphane Côté, the current Director of Sales for Ontario, on July 1, 2013. Stéphane has been with Corby and Pernod Ricard for nine years, and for 24 years in the alcohol beverage industry. Stéphane’s extensive sales experience has covered seven provinces including Ontario, Québec, British Colombia and the Atlantics. “We are delighted to welcome Stéphane to the Executive team. Stéphane brings a wealth of experience and leadership that will allow us to continue seamlessly to implement our long-term vision and strategy,” commented Mr. O’Driscoll.

 

Stéphane, a native of Québec, will continue to remain in the company’s headquarters in Toronto and will work with Andy between now and the end of July to ensure a smooth transition. “I am excited and honoured to accept this new role and look forward to working closely with our trade partners across Canada to build on the sales success that Andy has brought to the company over the years,” said Mr. Côté.

 

Succession planning is a fundamental strategic pillar of Corby’s people strategy. “I am very pleased to see this strategy come to fruition in this key personnel move”, added Paul Holub, Vice-President of Human Resources.

 

 

——

SHADOW BEVERAGES AND SNACKS APPOINTS FORMER PEPSICO EXECUTIVE TO CHIEF MARKETING OFFICER

 

Source: Shadow Beverage

April 1, 2013

 

Shadow Beverages and Snacks recently appointed Bob Shafer as Chief Marketing Officer reporting directly to George Martinez, President, Shadow Beverages and Snacks. In this newly created position, Mr. Shafer will lead the company’s national brand and retail sales strategies while supporting key customer and distributor expansion plans.

 

Mr. Shafer brings 30 years of CPG experience to Shadow having started his career at Procter and Gamble in the food products division. After four years at P&G, Mr. Shafer moved to Pepsico, Inc. where he held various U.S. and international sales, marketing and general management roles for 28 years. Mr. Shafer started his PepsiCo career in the food service organization, delivering consistent results in sales and general management roles managing key Pepsi bottlers and customers in the Midwestern U.S. He then moved to PepsiCo’s international organization and led businesses in both Spain and Poland, directing the Polish business to profitability. Mr. Shafer returned to the U.S. and held headquarters’ leadership positions as Vice President of Marketing and Vice President of Retail Sales. He oversaw the development of annual operating plans and managed key national customers. Mr. Shafer retired from PepsiCo in March 2011.  

 

“Bob’s extensive career in the CPG industry is exemplary, and we couldn’t be more thrilled to have him join our team in a significant leadership role,” said George Martinez, President, Shadow Beverages and Snacks. “Bob’s experience in successfully developing channel and customer strategies and creating annual operating plans for Pepsico will be a tremendous asset in accelerating Shadow’s growth in the nutritional and functional products space.”

 

 

——

Texas: Opinion: Myths invade arguments over Sunday liquor sales

 

Lobbyists would deny competition, patron convenience

 

Source: Chron

By David Ozgo

Ozgo is chief economist, Distilled Spirits Council based in Washington, D.C.

March 29, 2013

 

In any public policy debate there are myths and there are facts. The discussion surrounding House Bill 421, a bill to allow expanded hours for Texas package stores, including Sunday alcohol sales, is certainly no different.

 

Right now the main lobbying group that represents about one-third of liquor stores throughout Texas is circulating a “fact sheet” to legislators with a set of talking points that deserve a place in the mythology hall of fame. In the interest of public clarity, I’d like to explore a few of the lobbying group’s claims and report real facts on what Sunday sales would mean for Texans.

 

First, the package store lobby claims that advocates of HB 421 believe Sunday sales will increase liquor sales by 22 percent and cautions legislators to “Be careful: In Colorado [The Distilled Spirits Council] said that Sunday sales would increase tax revenues by $6 million, but the actual increase was a mere $2 million.”

 

Out of context, that may sound like we missed it. But consider, Colorado passed Sunday sales in 2008 – at the beginning of the worst recession in living memory – and that additional $2 million from Sunday alcohol sales was the only positive line item in the entire Colorado budget during that time. And that figure only took excise tax collections into account. When state excise and sales tax revenues are accounted for, Colorado generated new tax revenue exceeding the projected $6 million. Many in Colorado pointed to Sunday sales as a major success during that difficult time.

 

In fact, the Distilled Spirits Council has consistently projected sales gains for Sunday spirits sales in the 4 percent to 7 percent range. These projections are based upon historical experiences of Sunday sales in other states. We’ve been right every time.

 

Second, the package store lobby claims that Sunday purchases will cannibalize sales from other days of the week. This has not been the case in any other state.

 

In fact, some of the first adopters of Sunday sales have been states where the government owns and runs the liquor stores. In all cases, after a period of experimentation, public administrators, who had nothing to gain personally, sought legislative approval to open more stores on Sundays. These public administrators have no incentive to open Sundays except to generate additional revenue from increased consumer convenience.

 

Sunday sales as a policy works because today’s shoppers crave service and convenience. Sunday is the second-busiest shopping day of the week in Texas. Even an early survey by the package store lobby showed that 30 percent of their customers were interested in shopping on Sundays.

 

As a former Texas business owner myself, if I knew 30 percent of my customers wanted me open on Sundays, you can bet I’d be open.

 

Third, the package store lobby is concerned that if Texas were to reach the projected level of new “state tax revenue,” the “state tax revenue” divided up “per store” would not be enough to cover store overhead. Well, fortunately, this is an easy myth to clear up. You see, businesses do not cover overhead with state tax revenue. They cover overhead with sales revenue. More important, the decision of whether to open Sundays should be like any other business decision. Most important, this legislation would not force one single store to open on Sundays. Store owners are simply given the choice to open.

 

One thing is certain, however: Blocking all competition from opening is not the answer – and not the Texas way.

 

The package store lobby’s final concern is with a study that found car crashes rose sharply in New Mexico after Sunday sales passed. Again, this study has been widely discredited for several reasons, not the least of which is failing to account for a speed limit increase over the same time period. Researchers who follow Sunday sales debates understand this particular study is debunked. But New Mexico is only one state. Other studies have found no increase in underage drinking or drunk driving in states that adopted Sunday alcohol sales.

 

The public should not allow any organization’s myths to sully the debate. The bottom line is that HB 421 is about convenience, consumer sovereignty and economic fairness in the marketplace.

 

I think we can all raise a toast to that fact.

 

 

——

Tennessee: Wine bill stalls in Senate Finance Committee

 

Source: News 2

Apr 02, 2013

 

Legislation to allow wine to be sold in Tennessee supermarkets and convenience stores has hit another road block.

 

Members of the Senate Finance Committee voted 5-5 on Tuesday to keep the measure from advancing. The vote came after House leaders said they didn’t want to reconsider the companion bill that earlier failed by a single vote.

 

Republican Senate sponsor Bill Ketron of Murfreesboro has said he wants to get the bill out of the committee in case the situation changes in the House.

 

Both Republican and Democratic Senate members of the Republican-sponsored bill said they didn’t see a need for it to advance if the House doesn’t plan to bring it up again.

 

Ketron told reporters after the hearing that he’s not giving up on the bill and is checking to see if the committee can reconsider its action.

 

 

——

Maine: Wine – Distribution laws more than a little ridiculous (Excerpt)

 

Source: Press Herald

By JOE APPEL

Apr 3rd

 

I had a wonderful wine last weekend. Maybe you’ve had it, but I’m guessing you haven’t. Not because you don’t have impeccable taste, an open spirit or fat wallet. Not because it’s an older vintage cellared for years, not even because it’s made in such tiny quantities that you have to be on some velvet-rope mailing list to get a bottle.

 

No, you haven’t had this wine because you live in Maine, whose wine distribution channels are legally administered by the “three-tier system.” This is the arrangement, developed after Prohibition was repealed, which obligates producers to sell to distributors, who then sell to retailers (either “off-premise” shops or “on-premise” restaurants). In other words, the retailer can’t work out a deal directly with the winemaker.

 

In Maine, we call distributors “importers” and add a fourth tier of our own, the state-licensed distributor. (Whereas in New York, for instance, where I enjoyed the wonderful wine, the importer can sell directly to the retailer.) The official reason for this is a desire to be especially arcane and ridiculous, or to pry more revenue out of us. I forget which.

 

http://www.pressherald.com/life/foodanddining/distribution-laws-more-than-a-little-ridiculous_2013-04-03.html

 

 

Liquor Industry News 4-2-13

April 2, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday April 2nd 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic FRUIT Day

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

Scotch sales hit by eurozone debt crisis

 

Source: The Scotsman

By PETER RANSCOMBE

Tuesday 2 April 2013 09:38

 

Scotch whisky exports edged up by just 1 per cent last year as changes to the rate of duty in France and the eurozone debt crisis continued to take their toll.

 

Overseas sales hit £4.3 billion, a new record, but failed to match the 23 per cent rise reported in 2011 when French retailers stocked but ahead of a tax change or the 10 per cent notched up in 2010.

 

The volume of Scotch exports fell by 5 per cent to just under 1.2 billion 70cl bottles.

 

Yet Scotch still brought in an average of £135 a second for the UK’s balance of trade, despite the eurozone debt crisis forcing consumers in Mediterranean countries to cut back on their spending.

 

Highlights in the latest set of figures – released today by the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) trade body – included sales in the United States breaking through the £700 million barrier for the first time to hit £758m, cementing America’s position as whisky’s largest export market.

 

Globally, single malt exports have risen by 190 per cent over the past decade from £268m to £778m as consumers develop a taste for more-expensive whiskies.

 

Gavin Hewitt, the SWA’s chief executive, said: “Scotch whisky continues to lead the way for UK food and drink exports.

 

“A combination of successful trade negotiations, excellent marketing by producers, growing demand from mature markets, particularly the US, and the growing middle class in emerging economies helped exports hit a record £4.3bn last year. We are contributing massively to the government’s wish for an export-led recovery.

 

“There is confidence in the future of the industry, illustrated by the £2bn capital investment that Scotch whisky producers have committed over the next three to four years. New distilleries have opened and older ones brought back to use to meet rising demand.”

 

The trends highlighted in the full-year figures reflect those flagged-up in the interim data from the SWA back in October.

 

Exports to Singapore, which acts as a distribution hub for many Asian countries, were up 7 per cent to £339m, with Taiwan 7 per cent higher at £165m and direct shipments to China growing by 8 per cent to £72m.

 

Indian imports jumped by 17 per cent to £62m despite an “onerous” 150 per cent import tariff and local taxes.

 

The SWA said: “A successful outcome to on-going negotiations between the European Union (EU) and India on the free trade agreement (FTA) would reduce the onerous 150 per cent import tariff.”

 

Whisky is one of the UK’s fastest-growing exports to Mexico, increasing by 14 per cent to £92m.

 

Imports in other South American countries have also benefited from a FTA with the EU.

 

 

——

Molson Coors Brewing Co. (TAP): “TAP” into NA employment recovery and new products; Buy

 

Source: Goldman Sachs

April 1st

 

INVESTMENT LIST MEMBERSHIP: Americas Buy List

COVERAGE VIEW: NEUTRAL

 

Source of opportunity

We upgrade shares of Molson Coors (TAP) to Buy from Neutral and raise our 12-month price target to $63 (from $47) implying 29% upside. We believe TAP is a compelling risk/reward proposition as the US employment recovery and a new product cycle drive upward earnings revisions and multiple re-rating for this deep value asset. This is an out-of-consensus call as TAP is one of the most under-loved stocks in Consumer Staples with valuation in the bottom decile of the group. We are above consensus in each of the next three years and are forecasting a 17% multiple expansion to 14X P/E as improving volume erodes the negative sentiment.

 

Catalyst

Improving volume in NA – The key catalyst driving our upside expectations is the rising tide of a recovery in N. American beer volumes in response to an improving employment environment.

New products driving better market share and improved mix – 2013 points to a promising new product pipeline, with brands such as Third Shift and Redd Ale going after a ‘whitespace’ opportunity at a higher price point. We estimate new products could add ~4% to MillerCoors’ volume.

 

Cost savings announcement in June – We see margin upside potential on a new cost savings program likely to be announced at the June Investor Day and Europe synergies from the Starbev acquisition.

 

Capital deployment potential should begin to come into view – We expect the share buyback to be resumed in 2014.

 

Valuation

Our 12-month P/E based price target is $63, up from $47, on a higher P/E (14X from 11X) and higher EPS due to an improved fundamental outlook.

 

Key risks

Lower NA beer volumes, reduced pricing power and M&A.

 

 

——

Chinese liquor maker’s net profit jumps 61 pct

 

Source: Xinhua

April 02, 2013

 

Wuliangye Yibin Co., Ltd., one of China’s top liquor brands, announced Monday that its 2012 net profit surged 61.35 percent year on year to 9.94 billion yuan (1.6 billion U.S. dollars).

 

However, the alcohol drinks maker warned in its annual report to the Shenzhen Stock Exchange that such rapid growth might not be repeated this year due to “changes in macro policy and economic environment,” predicting a “slowdown” in revenue.

 

In December, the Chinese government launched a national campaign prohibiting officials and military officers from extravagance.

 

Many analysts fear the frugality push will have a sizeable impact on liquor makers, which have been relying heavily on government receptions and business banquets for revenues.

 

Business revenues of Wuliangye rose 33.66 percent to 27.2 billion yuan, said the liquor distiller, which is based in the city of Yibin of southwestern Sichuan Province.

 

The board proposed a pre-tax cash dividend of 8 yuan for every 10 shares, which could cost the firm 3.04 billion yuan. The proposal is still subject to the approval of shareholders.

 

The producer said in its annual report that it booked a combined gain of 772,066 yuan in equity investment, with an investment profit of 1.95 million yuan in China Merchants Bank, a 1.11 million yuan loss in China Unicom shares and a 54,000 yuan loss in China Cosco shares.

 

In February, China’s top price regulator — the National Development and Reform Commission — ordered Wuliangye to pay 202 million yuan in fines for price-fixing, while Kweichow Moutai Co. , the biggest spirits producer by market value, was also penalized for 247 million yuan.

 

Moutai’s net profit increased 51.86 percent year on year to 13.31 billion yuan last year.

 

The share price of Wuliangye dropped 1.84 percent to 21.93 yuan in Shenzhen on Monday.

 

 

——

Anheuser-Busch releases statement about class-action lawsuit

 

Source: KSDK

Apr 1, 2013   

 

Anheuser-Busch has released a statement regarding a class-action lawsuit against the company.

 

Peter Kraemer, vice president of brewing and supply, says former employee Jim Clark “improperly used and misrepresented” confidential information for personal gain.

 

Kraemer says there was never a complaint filed regarding accusations of the company cutting the stated alcohol content by 3 to 8 percent.

 

NewsChannel 5’s I-Team hired St. Louis Testing Labs to test the alcohol content of Budweiser and Coors beers in February.

 

The tests showed both beers contained their stated alcohol content of five percent.

 

Here is Kraemer’s full statement:

 

“Jim Clark is a former employee, now a California lawyer, who is working with the lawyers who brought several class-action lawsuits against Anheuser-Busch. We believe Clark improperly used and misrepresented our confidential information to instigate these lawsuits, all for his personal gain. We will take all legal means to stop him.

 

“Our company has a formal process for employees to make complaints confidentially through a third-party, yet none was ever filed on this matter. We believe this was an orchestrated effort by Clark to misrepresent our processes and smear our company and brands, yet knowing fully that the company complies with all alcohol labeling laws and adheres to the highest standards in brewing.

 

“We don’t disclose our recipes, intellectual property or other key competitive information, which are vital to our operation and competitiveness. Our employees understand this and sign agreements to protect information like this, which is standard in most companies.

 

“We would never compromise the quality or the taste of any of our beers for any reason. Producing the highest-quality beer is the basis for everything we do.

 

“The class-action lawsuits are groundless and the claims against Anheuser-Busch are completely false.”

 

 

——

AB InBev Accused Of Retaliation Over Watered-Down Beer Suit

 

Source: Law 360

By Kurt Orzeck

April 01, 2013

 

An ex-Anheuser-Busch InBev NV employee-turned-lawyer on Friday urged a California federal judge to dismiss the company’s trade secrets suit against him, accusing AB InBev of retaliation over his role in a class action alleging the company watered down its beer.

 

In a memorandum, former director of operations support James Alan Clark said AB InBev had broken federal law by filing a breach of contract suit against him because the “vague and winnable” complaint was a transparent effort to trample on his free speech rights. The company’s suit also violates California law barring strategic lawsuits against public participation, he said.

 

“To allow AB [InBev] to proceed with this vindictive litigation would empower all employers to punish former employees like Mr. Clark for reporting misconduct and for speaking out on behalf of consumers,” the memorandum said. “If this motion is not granted, additional employee witnesses would be dissuaded from speaking out about the true nature of AB [InBev]’s products and of the company’s widespread deception.”

 

Clark worked for AB InBev from November 1998 until June 2012, when he resigned to begin practicing law, according to the memo. He claims that, during that time frame, he complained to roughly 20 senior managers that the company watered down its beers – including Budweiser, Bud Ice and Michelob – in order to churn out more units of beer from the same starting batch of ingredients.

 

One of Clark’s first forays into law was a planned class action related to his allegations, the memo says. He says he turned to the Mills Law Firm and Bramson Plutzik Mahler & Birkhaeuser LLP for help in prosecuting the case.

 

In December, the Mills Law Firm sent AB InBev a notice for corrective action over the alleged manufacture of watered-down beer. Clark alleges the company knew of his involvement in the planned suit because it contacted him about it, even though Clark’s name didn’t appear on the notice.

 

In February, Clark refused AB InBev’s demand that he testify under oath that he had not misappropriated any confidential information in the lead-up to the lawsuit filing, according to the memo. Two beer drinkers filed the class action in California federal court on Feb. 22, and three days later, other beer drinkers submitted similar class actions in New Jersey and Pennsylvania federal courts.

 

AB InBev filed its suit on March 1, accusing him of breaching confidentiality agreements and misappropriating trade secrets, then told Clark it would settle if he revealed the alleged trade secrets he gave to the California class action plaintiff’s attorneys and named any AB InBev employees who were assisting them, he claims.

 

“AB’s settlement offer … denotes clearly and unmistakably that the instant SLAPP action arises out of Mr. Clark’s constitutional rights of petition and free speech exercised in connection with the class action,” the memo said.

 

Clark claims he did not take any AB InBev documents with him when he resigned and that he hasn’t disclosed company trade secrets to any competitor, proceeding or investigation. He added that AB InBev’s suit doesn’t allege specific instances of trade secrets misappropriation or breach of contract.

 

Clark cited California’s anti-SLAPP statute – which seeks to reduce meritless federal complaints involving diversity and protect whistleblowers from legal retribution – in asking the judge to dismiss AB InBev’s suit. He noted that information involved in the California class action was protected by attorney-client privilege.

 

AB InBev, for its part, says Clark’s allegations against the company are meritless.

 

“Clark improperly used and misrepresented our confidential information to instigate [the class action lawsuits,] all for his personal gain,” AB InBev vice president of brewing and supply Peter Kraemer said Monday. “We believe this was an orchestrated effort by Clark to misrepresent our processes and smear our company and brands, yet knowing fully that the company complies with all alcohol labeling laws and adheres to the highest standards in brewing.”

 

Attorneys for the defendant did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.

 

The plaintiffs are represented by Marcus S. Topel of Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman LLP.

 

The defendant is represented by Robert A. Carichoff of the Law Office of Robert A. Carichoff.

 

The case is Anheuser-Busch Cos. LLC et al. v. James Alan Clark, case number 2:13-cv-00415, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California.

 

–Additional reporting by Megan Stride. Editing by Elizabeth Bowen.

 

 

——

America’s Beer Distributors Recognize National Alcohol Awareness Month

 

Highlight Effective Role of State-Based Alcohol Regulation

 

Source: NBWA

April 1st

 

During the month of April, the National Beer Wholesalers Association (NBWA) will be recognizing Alcohol Awareness Month, as designated by the U.S. Health and Human Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), to raise awareness about the problem of alcohol abuse.

 

“Alcohol is a unique product that is not for everyone,” said NBWA President Craig Purser. “National Alcohol Awareness Month is a great time to recognize that alcoholic beverages need to be effectively regulated so they are not abused and do not end up in the hands of those under the legal drinking age. Responsibility begins with effective regulation, and the U.S. has been fortunate to have a time-tested system of alcohol regulation in place for eight decades – a system that allows the states to decide how best to regulate and track alcohol.”

 

The 130,000 men and women of the American beer distribution industry play a critical role in the effort to encourage responsible consumption and eliminate alcohol abuse of all types, including drunk driving and the underage purchase and consumption of alcohol.  Alcohol is not like other consumer products and can have consequences if abused. That’s why beer distributors are regulated and work to take steps to ensure the safe and legal sale of alcohol, fight efforts to weaken regulations that provide a safe and orderly marketplace and participate in programs that promote alcohol education and responsible consumption only by adults of legal drinking age.

 

NBWA encourages parents, educators and community leaders to utilize SAMHSA resources that can help educate young people about the dangers of underage drinking and the importance of making smart decisions. More information about these resources can be found at www.stopalcoholabuse.gov.

 

To read about responsibility initiatives America’s beer distributors have launched in their local communities, visit www.distributorresponsibility.com.

 

 

——

Which drinker is most at risk of getting liver disease? The results of our scientific test will astonish you (Excerpt)

 

Source: Daily Mail

By Angela Epstein

1 April 2013

 

Liver disease is now the fifth biggest killer in the UK – with the number of people dying from it rising by 20 per cent over the past decade. However, there are often no warning signs until it is far advanced, so many of us could have the potentially fatal condition without even realising it.

 

Indeed, when the British Liver Trust recently offered members of the public on-the-spot screening, one in four people tested showed signs of early scarring.

 

‘Most people die of liver disease after just their first or second admission to hospital for it, as they have not realised they were suffering with it – and their condition will be so far advanced. By the time they are seen, it is too late,’ says Dr Martin Prince, consultant hepatologist at the Manchester Royal Infirmary.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2302486/Which-drinkers-risk-getting-liver-disease-The-results-scientific-test-astonish-you.html

 

 

——

Iowa: Prolific tiny liquor stores blamed for Des Moines crime

 

Source: Des Moines Register

Mar 31, 2013

 

Tom Duax pulls no punches when he talks about his competitor across Second Avenue in Des Moines – or others that have sprouted up in his scrappy neighborhood.

 

The owner of Central City Liquors and his employees say the competitor, Nat’s Food Mart, opens at 6 a.m. to a steady stream of ne’er-do-wells who are looking to buy cheap booze and, they suspect, those synthetic products people smoke.

 

“Here’s my proof: Every morning I sweep my parking lot … I find remnants of packages that say, ‘Not for human consumption,’ ” he said.

 

Nat’s, attached to a Star gas station at 1443 Second Ave., is one of numerous stores in the neighborhood busted recently for selling alcohol to minors.

 

Database: Class E liquor licenses

 

Duax’s questions to The Des Moines Register Reader’s Watchdog: Why are the state and city allowing so many of these mom-and-pop liquor stores to proliferate, and why don’t they more effectively enforce laws on such businesses?

 

“This is not about competition,” insists Duax, a veteran in the business who owns one of the largest liquor stores in the state. “It’s about safety. Do we really need 67 places in Des Moines selling liquor? That is that many more that can sell liquor to minors and whatever else comes along.”

 

Jasjit “Ben” and Geet Singh, owners of Nat’s, say it’s absolutely about competition.

 

The couple said they do not sell synthetic drugs or anything else related to drugs, and their neighbor is hell-bent on running them out of business.

 

Duax, they say, has made trouble for them with the city, the state and in the neighborhood.

 

“We’re business rivals,” Ben Singh said. “I understand he thinks there are too many liquor licenses now, but we’re not the only ones.”

 

When I visited Nat’s for the first time in February, chains covered the beer coolers, the price of a 30-day suspended license after workers twice sold alcohol to underage customers. There were cheap cigars and regular incense, but no products in sight that looked like synthetic drugs.

 

Many of the stores Duax gripes about popped up after the Legislature changed a years-old state law in 2011, and allowed gas-selling convenience stores to sell hard liquor, including whiskey and vodka, in their aisles.

 

Today, there are 15 such stores within a couple of miles of Duax’s business, according to a map I obtained from the Iowa Alcoholic Beverages Division. Most of them received licenses before new regulations were put in place by the city that attempt to reign in new business near old liquor stores, and they are not subject to newer rules prohibiting sales near schools and other places where families dwell.

 

Nat’s Food Mart was the only one of those stores in Des Moines with a suspended Class E liquor license last month. The suspension ended March 6, city officials said.

 

The Singhs say they fired the employees who sold to underage customers and provided state-led training for everyone else who works for them to assure such sales don’t happen again.

 

“But it hasn’t mattered,” Geet Singh told me. “From the day we got our license suspension, this is what we have had to go through.”

 

Duax is correct that other competitors in the area have gotten in trouble for selling to minors. One of them, the Kum & Go at 2211 University Ave., had its license suspended for 60 days Feb. 28 for selling to minors, according to officials.

 

A Kum & Go at Southeast 14th Street and Park Avenue was fined last spring for the same. And the Shop N Save at 1829 Sixth Ave. has been in trouble in 2011 and 2012 for selling to minors, state records show. Also dinged: the Downtown Pantry at 204 Fourth St. and Smokin’ Joe’s Tobacco and Liquor at 2914 E. University Ave.

 

On Monday, Des Moines City Council members doled out $500 fines for sales to minors to University Groceries at 21st Street and University Avenue, Last Stop Beverage Shop at 2839 E. University Ave., Git-N-Go at 3274 E. University Ave. and Kum & Go at 3104 University Ave. A public hearing is set for April 8.

 

The Des Moines council spent a great deal of time last year trying to reign the expansion of businesses with Class E liquor licenses, imposing a moratorium on new ones until new regulations were developed.

 

At the time, Khalid Khan’s Fast Mart, located on Buchanan Street near East High School, was one of several small liquor stores in trouble with the city. His store was accused in February of selling synthetic marijuana responsible for the hospitalization of three Des Moines students.

 

Like the Singhs, Khan said at the time that he has taken steps to deny improper sales to minors. And like the Singhs, he said preventing liquor sales at his business would significantly affect his ability to provide for his family.

 

After the Legislature expanded liquor sales in 2011, the city prohibited new Class E liquor licenses near churches, schools, day cares and parks, and it required any small store to be at least a quarter of a mile from any similar business already selling liquor. That slowed requests for new licenses, according to City Attorney Jeff Lester.

 

City Councilman Brian Meyer said he has resisted drafting any new rules that would discriminate among different businesses based on size or location.

 

But in answer to Duax’s questions, state and city officials are beginning to crack down.

 

Des Moines city officials have been mulling new rules that would attempt to reign in so-called nuisance liquor stores like nuisance properties or bars.

 

City Councilwoman Christine Hensley said the proliferation of new licenses in urban areas is also a huge concern for the Iowa Alcoholic Beverage Division. She met last week with officials from Kum & Go and others to explore a state law change that would allow competition while giving cities more authority to revoke the licenses of problem businesses.

 

Synthetic drugs? Duax also will be glad to know the state and city are working to go after any business suspected of selling them.

 

In February, the state attorney general’s office obtained a court order to seize products suspected of being synthetic drugs from a store owned by Sarbreet Singh and Sandeep Kaur under Iowa’s Consumer Fraud Act. The two own a Shop N Save at 4685 N.W. Second St. The move came after an undercover officer purchased a product called “7H” and a glass smoking pipe on Nov. 28, 2012, followed by an ongoing investigation by the police and U.S. Postal Service.

 

“There will be more – absolutely,” said Bill Brauch, who heads the office’s Consumer Protection Division. “This was not the only matter under investigation.”

 

The Governor’s Office of Drug Control Policy this year upped the ante yet again in its pursuit of businesses that sell those products.

 

A bill before the House Ways and Means Committee would make carrying amounts of the drug-like substances as small as 1 gram a Class D felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and a $7,500 fine. Another bill that aimed to reign in new types of imitation drugs, including “fake pot,” died after failing to advance in either chamber.

 

“Legislators expressed some frustration that there is already some blanket language in the code that is not being extensively used,” said Steve Lukan, director of the Drug Control Policy office. “But prosecutors would say they don’t know if that blanket language is strong enough to take into court. And unless the crime is a felony, it’s not as high on their to-do list.”

 

Lukan did say, however, that his office is working with the state Alcoholic Beverages Division to train investigators to notify the Division of Narcotics Enforcement when a business is suspected of selling synthetic drugs.

 

The Legislature’s move in 2011 clearly opened up new business, but a lot of resources are now being spent to curb criminal activity, especially in urban areas like Des Moines.

 

We all have to ask: What will be the price that we ultimately pay?

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: The downside of privatized liquor sales

 

Source: Lancaster Online

By DAVID BENDER, Special to the Sunday News

Mar 31, 2013

 

Want to know what drinking looks like in Pennsylvania? Put 100 adults in a room with 100 bottles of liquor. Come back later and you’ll find 7 of them drinking half the bottles. The other 93 are cleaning up the mess. Throw in adolescents and it gets uglier. Toss the latest plan for privatization into the room and you start writing hefty tax checks, especially if you’re one of the 93.

 

Privatization is not bad, but it’s not free. Despite claims of revenue neutrality, it’s not even close. The mostly unread 200-page bill that hit the House floor completely changed the sources of budget revenue. But not one person voting on it reviewed an analysis of longterm financial impact. That’s because no such analysis was prepared. What business owner would sell an asset without that information?

 

You own this asset. It’s up to you to demand the accounting. Legislative leadership failed to check the state pension numbers in 2001 and created the multibillion dollar crisis you’re paying for today. They’ll do it again unless you insist otherwise.

 

Don’t like math? Let’s have fun. Say you own a machine pumping out $550 in cash this year. A guy in a nice suit says he’ll give you $800 for the machine and you’ll get $500 plus small increases every year. Not a bad deal if you invest the money in another machine. But you’re broke. So you spend the $800. It’s gone.

 

You’re happy until you recall how the machine increased your payout every year. By year 10 it’s cranking $900 to the new owner; by year 20 it’s up to $1,500. The small increases promised by the guy in the nice suit don’t come near that, so the gap is at least $300 in year 10 and $700 in year 20. Add six zeros to those numbers and you get the current version of privatization. You, the taxpayer, will be called on to fill a $700 million hole. All for someone else’s cheap vodka.

 

I’m a free market guy and understand why you’re being asked to give up your share of ownership in the stores. But anyone making that argument needs to acknowledge the cost. The only way to balance the books with privatization is to raise the liquor tax from 18% to at least 30% depending on which bill is passed.

 

Being one of the 93 percent who don’t pound down bottles, I’d be fine with that increase. The 7 percent who drink the most ought to pay the most. But the latest proposal doesn’t do that. It picks up one end of a table holding treasure that currently belongs to all of the citizens and sends that money sliding into the pockets of licensees and the controlling distilleries in France, Britain, India, South Africa and China. It hits up 93 percent of hard-working Pennsylvanians for what was lost. Those who drink the least will pay the most.

 

Just ask yourself these questions: Will easily accessed alcohol lead Pennsylvania to global excellence? Will a greater selection of alcohol improve the health of our citizens? Will it raise workforce readiness? Will it enhance technological innovation? Will it improve academic performance? Will it foster the development of new cutting edge industries?

 

You know the answers. Privatize or don’t, but give us an accounting.

 

David Bender is executive director and CEO of Compass Mark, a nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing the incidence, prevalence and consequences of the abuse of and addiction to alcohol and other drugs.

 

 

——

NABCA Legislative Update: March 16, 2013-March 29, 2013

 

Source: NABCA

April 1st

 

http://www.nabca.org/News/Files/130329%20Legislation%20and%20Regulation%20State%20Update.pdf

 

http://www.nabca.org/News/Files/130329%20Legislation%20and%20Regulation%20Category%20Update.pdf

 

http://www.nabca.org/News/Files/130329%20Regulatory%20Update.pdf

 

 

——

Washington Wines Pack High Alcohol Wallop, Little Else

 

Source: Bloomberg

By John Mariani

Apr 1, 2013

 

On a recent trip to Seattle I had the chance to revisit the wines of Washington state, the nation’s second largest premium wine producer after California.

 

I’ve always had high regard for a few estates like the pioneering Chateau Ste. Michelle and Columbia Crest.

 

Washington has had wine grape plantings since 1825, and today the state has 750 wineries and 13 approved appellations selling $3 billion a year.

 

Yet, it only became a modern viticultural region during the 1970s, when strides were made in producing consistently good vinifera like chardonnay, cabernet sauvignon and merlot in the Yakima and Columbia River valleys.

 

Since then, there has been a good deal of experimentation with other varietals like riesling, semillon and syrah, and some of the state’s very best wines are late harvest dessert wines. Rieslings in particular have compared variably with those in Alsace and New York state for their balance of fruit and acidity.

 

Washington has always prided itself on intense, highly tannic, high-alcohol wines that show well in their youth but often lose brightness and complexity with age. This, I’m sorry to say, was even more prevalent among the wines I sampled then I can recall from previous tastings.

 

One Dimensional

 

The most salient example was a Woodward Canyon Old Vines Dedication Series #28 Cabernet Sauvignon 2008 ($75) from Walla Walla. With a whopping 16.5 percent alcohol, it was all full- tilt tannin and new oak, and after just half a glass, I found nothing distinctive about it except for its one-dimensional character. After five years this monster should have loosened up but hasn’t.

 

The same winery’s Artist Series #18 ($45) was only 15.8 percent alcohol, but still felt like a blow to the palate rather than a pleasurable wine, despite a Bordeaux-like blend of cabernet franc, merlot, petit verdot and syrah in with the cabernet sauvignon.

 

Columbia Valley Cabernet Sauvignon 2003, is a much- ballyhooed cult favorite that sells in stores for between $300 and $400. At 14.9 percent alcohol and a decade old it was a blockbuster, but once it exploded in the mouth, there was no finish of any kind.

Veal Chop

 

I found relief from the brash alcohol levels with a well- fruited Seven Hills Merlot 2007 ($22) whose softness was due to the varietal, while an inexpensive cabernet sauvignon from Chaz Point 2010 ($18) showed round levels of fruit and a pleasing lushness that went very well with a veal chop over dinner.

 

There was also a good mix of strawberry-like fruit and cherry flavors in JM Cellars Tre Fanciulli 2007 ($35). It’s a judicious blend of 67 percent cabernet sauvignon, 19 percent merlot and 14 percent syrah which boosted the elegance of the wine. At only 14.4 percent alcohol, it shows how the terroir of the Columbia Valley, whose south-facing slopes get a great deal of solar radiation, can produce power within a velvet glove.

 

Among the rieslings I drank in Seattle, I very much enjoyed a citrus-bright Efeste Evergreen Vineyard 2011 ($17) that was an ideal match with cold shellfish.

 

Boom Boom

 

Washington vintners have a knack for quirky names for their wines, like Boom Boom, Livewire and Jigsaw. Kung Fu Girl, a riesling by Charles Smith, is a crowd pleaser at about $10; it makes no pretensions other than to show off good apple, melon flavors and a little sweetness that makes it a fine aperitif.

 

Smith says that he “focuses on the way people generally consume wine today: immediately. The intent was (and still is) to create wines to be enjoyed now, but with true ‘typicity’ of both the varietal and the vineyard.” His motto? “It’s just wine, drink it.”

 

Wine is a lot more, certainly, but Washington vintners should step away from thinking that a bigger wine is a better wine.

 

(John Mariani writes about wine for Muse, the arts and culture section of Bloomberg News. The opinions expressed are his own.)

 

 

——

Brown Brothers puts White Hills Vineyard for sale

 

Source: DBR

02 April 2013

 

Brown Brothers, an Australia-based family-owned wine company, has placed its White Hills Vineyard in Tasmania for sale, as part of plans to restructure its business due to decline of sales in Europe.

 

White Hills Vineyard was purchased from a timber company Gunns in 2010.

 

Located in the Tamar Valley in the north of Tasmania, the 83ha vineyard is planted with varieties such as Pinot Noir, Chardonnay, Riesling, Sauvignon Blanc, Pinot Gris and Gewurztraminer.

 

Brown Brothers chief executive Ronald Wahlquist was quoted by themercury.com as saying that the sale was part of the company’s broader restructure program.

 

“We have asked the permanent employees to stay on and run the vineyard until it sells,” Wahlquist added.

 

“We are still selling grapes from that operation and the vineyard market is sound.”

 

The winery also owns The Hazards Vineyard and Kayena Vineyard in Tasmania region, which it plans to retain.

 

Brown Brothers also plans to sell its Whitlands Vineyard in Victoria.

 

 

——

Indian wine market to experience slow performance in coming years: Report

 

Source: DBR

01 April 2013

 

The performance of Indian wine market in the next five years may not be as good as what it was between 2006 and 2011, finds a new survey by UK-based research firm Canadean – Wines & Spirits.

 

According to the report ‘The Future of the Wine Market in India, to 2016’, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of India’s wine industry during 2011-16 period is expected to be 5%, compared to 7.56% posted in the review period.

 

India’s experience has been more or less same even from the consumption point of view, noted Canadean.

 

The wine consumption in 2011 rose by 44% over 2006 figures, while the survey estimates for 2016 is pegged at about 27.4% over 2011.

 

The slow-down in growth rate has reflected similarly among the industry’s segments, including still wine and sparkling wine. Fortified wine, however, is yet to penetrate in the Indian market.

 

According to the survey, still wine retains the monopoly in the country’s vast wine market with a consistent share from 2006 through 2016.

 

With little more than 70% share in 2006 and 2011, the still wine market is likely to continue the momentum until 2016 with a steady performance. Sparkling wine has accounted for the remaining share of the Indian wine market in both review and forecast periods.

 

 

——

Oldenburg owner hits out at Pinotage

 

Source: the drinks business

by Lucy Shaw

28th March, 2013

 

Adrian Vanderspuy of Oldenburg Vineyards in Stellenbosch has blasted South Africa’s flasgship red grape Pinotage, stating he has no interest in the variety.

 

Speaking to the drinks business at a wine dinner at High Timber in London last night, Vanderspuy said: “Pinotage? I’ll leave the banana wines to other people.

 

“I don’t like the grape variety and have no interest in planting it. There is so much more South Africa can do to a higher level.”

 

South African-born, Switzerland-based Vanderspuy, who owns the boutique, 30-hectare Oldenburg estate in the Banghoek Valley in Stellenbosch, is instead putting his energies into Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Cabernet Franc and Syrah.

 

For his soon-to-be-released top wine, red blend Rhodium 2010, he decided to give Merlot a starring role in place of Cabernet Sauvignon.

 

“I wanted to lead with Merlot because everyone is leading with Cabernet Sauvignon, and as a relatively new estate owner, I wanted to be different,” he told db.

 

“I started with 50% Cabernet in the blend but whittled it out completely in the end as the Merlot and Cabernet Franc worked so well together with a dash of Malbec.

 

“If you tasted the Malbec on its own you’d want to drink it by the gallon. It’s the most beautiful inky purple colour and has wonderful perfume,” he added.

 

Despite currently leading with Merlot, Vanderspuy, whose biggest export markets are Germany, Switzerland and the UK, hasn’t ruled out the idea of a Bordeaux-based red blend.

 

“I’m new to the game so am still working out which varieties are working best for us. It’s hard to single one out as having the best potential in South Africa.

 

“For us it would probably be Cabernet Sauvignon, but I think South Africa might end up having the most success with red blends that are more than the sum of their parts,” he said.

 

Rather than plough millions into building a winery, Vanderspuy currently rents the winemaking facilities at Glenelly, the Stellenbosch estate owned by former Château Pichon-Longueville owner May Elaine de Lencquesaing.

 

As for the whites, Vanderspuy believes passionately in the potential of Chenin Blanc, particularly when paired with a small percentage of Chardonnay and aged in 50% new French oak.

 

“Chenin has such a strong link to South Africa and it’s such a versatile grape.

 

“When I bought the estate in 2003 I had the chance to make Sauvignon Blanc but thought that in a few years there would be a glut and the thirst for it would die down,” Vanderspuy admitted.

 

“The world doesn’t need any more Sauvignon Blanc but it does need more Chenin,” he added.

 

Vanderspuy’s Chenin has caught the eye of Chenin pioneer Ken Forrester, who buys the grapes Oldenburg doesn’t use to vinify at his own estate and sell on.

 

 

——

Carrefour eyes Brazil and China for growth

 

Source: FT

By Scheherazade Daneshkhu in Paris

April 1st

 

Carrefour is working on a plan to expand its operations in Brazil and China, the details of which the French retailer is set to reveal at the start of next year, according to the group’s chairman and chief executive.

 

“Our rate of growth in these regions is probably insufficient. We are working on a strategy; these are big countries and there are lots of possibilities but I hope the plan will be ready by the beginning of next year,” says Georges Plassat in his first English-language newspaper interview since his arrival last year at Carrefour’s headquarters in Boulogne-Billancourt, west Paris.

 

Brazil and China are Carrefour’s second- and fifth-largest markets by sales respectively. While sales in Latin America – including Argentina – increased 14 per cent last year, they fell 10 per cent in Asia, which includes Taiwan and a small business in India.

 

Mr Plassat attributes much of that decline to China’s slowing economy and leadership change. “The Chinese economy is now focusing more on its interior and that’s where our future lies,” he says.

 

Since joining Carrefour a year ago, the veteran retailer has conducted a merciless diagnosis of the group’s problems. It was a “headless chicken” in which many executives had been “sedated” by the heavy hand of centralisation imposed on them by his predecessor, Lars Olofsson.

 

Mr Plassat’s rapid implementation of a new strategy, his confident, no-nonsense manner and successful record at Vivarte – the French retail conglomerate he turned to profit before joining Carrefour – have fired hopes that the world’s second-largest retailer by sales after Walmart is finally being turned round.

 

Those recovery hopes, after a 25 per cent slide in operating profits in three years, and earnings upgrades have lifted the shares 60 per cent since their 18-year low in July.

 

How sustainable that recovery will be remains to be seen.

 

Mr Plassat, who turned 64 last week, says he will do everything he can to create real value for the company “but it won’t be in two minutes”.

 

Critics say Carrefour is too dependent on hypermarkets, a format the retailer claims to have invented in 1963 but which is seen as out of date.

 

Mr Plassat says the hypermarket is not dead, but simply having a midlife crisis and he rejects an oft-proposed solution that reducing space is the answer. “You can often lose more in sales than the proportion of space shut,” he says.

 

Attention has also focused on how Carrefour will turn round non-food sales, which fell 25 per cent between 2004 and 2011.

 

Mr Plassat points out that electrical goods have been falling everywhere and says “the idea that hypermarkets have been worse hit than others by falling non-food sales is nonsense”.

 

But he admits the retailer had previously tried too hard to be fashionable and was “over-geared” towards seasonal stock that took up space. “People don’t go to a hypermarket to buy fashion but to buy things that are simple, basic and practical.”

 

So far, his strategy, which includes giving store managers more autonomy and a low-price pledge on 500 basics, has yielded an encouraging improvement in French operating profit margins to 2.6 per cent – still half those of Walmart and Tesco.

 

“Margins improved because we reduced significant losses caused by poor management – mainly linked to an oversupply of stock that was mind-blowing – that’s been stopped,” he says.

 

Most important is the implementation of a supply chain, integrating the hypermarkets, supermarkets and proximity stores with an IT system that will be the “spine” of the organisation.

 

Analysts at Credit Suisse estimate that poor IT systems led to waste of ?350m last year and that halving waste in France “represents a minimum of 50 basis points opportunity on margin”.

 

Another structural problem is Carrefour’s weighty exposure to slow-growing western markets – including austerity-hit Spain and Italy, which together with France account for 70 per cent of last year’s ?77bn of group sales.

 

Mr Plassat is characteristically blunt about exhortations to rebalance in favour of emerging markets which he thinks is both unrealistic and undesirable, other than in core markets, such as Brazil and China.

 

“We will see for how long the emerging markets maintain high growth,” he says gruffly. “I am thinking beyond the short term.”

 

He has withdrawn from Colombia, Indonesia, Malaysia – arguing that Carrefour was too small in those countries – and lossmaking Greece, raising a better than expected ?2.8bn that has been used to reduce debt and reinvest, mainly in Europe.

 

Eric Knight, chief executive of Knight Vinke, the US activist shareholder that has a 1.5 per cent stake, says approvingly: “The Colombia disposal, and others, has helped demonstrate that the value of a number of Carrefour’s international assets is substantially higher than is implied by the whole group’s current valuation.”

 

But others see a downside. “Recent disposals have helped the balance sheet but they have also increased Carrefour’s exposure to mature markets for which capex is also set to rise,” Justin Scarborough, analyst at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, said in a note.

 

For Mr Plassat southern Europe, with 160m people, represents among the highest per capital income in the world. “It would be completely stupid to abandon our market position [20 per cent] just because it is going through an economic crisis at the moment.”

He gives prevailing financial fashion short shrift, saying he has “no plans” to put Atacadão, the successful Brazilian cash and carry business, on the market nor for a partial listing of the Chinese business.

 

He intends to demonstrate the value of Carrefour’s property assets – estimated by analysts at ?18bn – through development, potentially including housing projects, rather than through a market listing or sales.

 

In Turkey, Carrefour is in talks with disgruntled joint venture partner Sabanci on options, including combining operations with Migros, a retailer controlled by BC Partners, the London-based private equity group. He says “it is probable” that the situation “will be clarified in several weeks”.

 

What of relations with Carrefour’s powerful 16 per cent shareholder Blue Capital – the joint venture between private equity funds Colony Capital of the US and Groupe Arnault, the investment vehicle of tycoon Bernard Arnault – to whom Mr Olofsson admitted giving fortnightly reports?

 

“I’m left to do my work, there is no interference,” says Mr Plassat. It would be entertaining to see them try.

 

 

——

Washington: Bills would loosen state liquor laws

 

Source: The Spokesman-Review

Jim Camden

April 2nd

 

For all the attention being paid to legal marijuana this session, it’s the more traditional legal intoxicant – alcohol – providing Washington legislators with a greater array of possible changes to state law.

 

More than a dozen bills working their way through the legislative process would increase a person’s ability to consume some form of alcohol at some new setting.

 

A glass of beer or wine in the theater? Several proposals for that.

 

How about a shot of something stronger with that movie? Separate bill for that.

 

Taste a bit of that expensive scotch before buying it at the store? The stores would like to oblige.

 

Free glass of wine with that massage and pedicure? Could be legal later this year.

 

Let college students who are 18 to 21 taste wine if they are in viticulture classes? Prospects look good, although the students won’t be allowed to swallow.

 

Buy a growler of cider at the local microbrewery? Maybe not; could be a problem under federal law.

 

Some say the Legislature has more ideas to loosen up liquor laws because voters in 2011 got the state out of the liquor business. Others say there aren’t more ideas, they’re just being doled out piecemeal rather than wrapped in a single piece of legislation, called an omnibus bill.

 

Last year’s omnibus bill died, and with it, all the work on liquor revisions, said Sen. Janea Holmquist Newbry, R-Moses Lake. This year, the strategy is to push them individually.

 

Derek Franklin of the Washington Association for Substance Abuse and Violence Prevention testified last Friday against many efforts to loosen alcohol consumption rules. Drinking in theaters and stores would push “the normalization of alcohol,” he said, sending teens a message it’s OK to drink, as well as get in a car to drive after imbibing. Each proposal “may seem small by comparison, but it puts incremental chips in the wall that protects our kids,” he said.

 

Franklin believes the Legislature saw a sharp increase in efforts to expand access to alcohol as a consequence of Initiative 1183, which got the state out of the wholesale and retail alcohol business last year, turning the sale of distilled spirits over to private license holders. Businesses look for additional ways to make money, and the state looks for new revenue from a heavily taxed product, he said.

 

Rick Garza of the Liquor Control Board said the Legislature always has some bills to address the state’s liquor laws, but it faces few new ideas this year. Many tweak existing laws, such as House Bill 1149, which was among the bills approved Monday by the Senate Commerce and Labor Committee. Current law says a craft distillery can only sell two liters of its products to one customer in a day; the bill would raise that to three liters.

 

Two other bills would change the rules for the kinds of stores that can offer samples of alcohol: One would allow big-box stores like Target to offer beer and wine samples by removing the current rule that half of a store’s sales must be for groceries in order to offer samples. Another would let liquor stores, wineries and craft distilleries offer samples of spirits, but no more than a half-ounce per sample, and only three samples per customer.

 

Some fail one year and come back the next, Garza said, like a proposal to allow day spas to buy a license to offer a free glass of wine or beer to a customer. The Senate passed a bill to make that legal last month on a 42-7 vote, but it has some resistance in the House, where there are questions whether it’s so broad it would allow free drinks at every nail salon in the state.

 

Another recurring request would loosen restrictions on selling alcohol in theaters. Some venues already offer alcohol on a limited basis by buying a tavern or restaurant license, then selling drinks away from the main concession stand in an area closed to minors. Two proposals would set up a special license for beer and wine sales in movie theaters, and another would add distilled spirits to the options.

 

Allowing more latitude in the sale of alcoholic beverages may be a key to keeping some of the state’s restored movie houses open, several owners told the Commerce Committee last week. Some big multiplexes already do it by restricting one of their many screens for adults. The one- and two-screen theaters need alcohol sales to compete, said Rand Thornsley, owner of the 1927 Liberty Theater in Camas.

 

“Unless we can find some new means of revenue, we’re not going to be able to continue beyond this year,” he said.

 

New this year are proposals to allow college students who are at least 18 but not yet 21 to sample wine as part of a course in culinary arts or viticulture. With the state’s burgeoning wine industry, some universities and community colleges offer courses in the science of making wine, and students should at least be allowed to sample their product and spit it out, said Rep. Larry Haler, R-Richland, sponsor of House Bill 1459.

 

“It’s similar to taking a cooking class and not being able to taste the food you made,” Holmquist Newbry said.

 

Also new is a proposal to allow patrons to refill a growler – a large personal container – with hard cider. State law already allows customers to buy a growler of beer or ale at a bar or tavern and drink it at home, but not hard cider.

 

Rep. Sam Hunt, D-Olympia, said the idea for House Bill 1008 was suggested by his daughter, who was told at a local microbrewery they couldn’t fill her growler with hard cider. The reason: Cider is considered a wine, not a beer, by the federal government for tax purposes. And growler sales of wine aren’t allowed.

 

Hard cider is making a comeback among consumers, and Washington, with its plentiful orchards, is leading the way in resurrecting the industry, Holmquist Newbry said.

 

But Hunt’s bill may need more time to ferment. Garza said the federal agency that collects alcohol taxes isn’t set up to collect revenue on growlers of cider. “This could be a violation of federal law,” he said.

 

 

——

Florida: Florida brewers push to legalize 64-ounce beer ‘growlers’

 

Source: AP

Published April 01, 2013

 

David Wescott has two 32-ounce growlers he brings into Proof Brewing Company to fill up and take home.

 

Why two? Because Florida is one of only three states where it’s illegal to fill one 64-ounce beer container, known as a growler. He can get as many of the 32-ounce containers filled as he wants, and Florida breweries can also fill unlimited 128-ounce growlers for customers to take home. But the size preferred by most beer enthusiasts is banned.

 

“If you’re bringing some beer home for you and the wife, that’s two beers,” Wescott, whose wife calls him a beer snob, said of the quart-sized growlers. “It makes no sense to me. It’s just not logical — 128s are probably too much, 32 is too small. I’d love to get a 64.”

 

Two lawmakers have filed bills to legalize the half-gallon jugs, but a group of beer distributors is fighting both measures and appears to have helped effectively kill both for the year.

 

“It’s really silly. I have in my office a 32-ounce, a gallon and a 64 to show people. And I ask them, `Which one do you think is currently illegal?”‘ said Rep. Katie Edwards, D-Plantation. “They all think the gallon is illegal. They say, `Oh, you’re trying to legalize the big one!’ and I say, `No, it’s the one in the middle,’ and it’s like, `Why is it not legal?’ They don’t get it.”

 

And Edwards doesn’t even drink beer. She said her only motive in sponsoring her bill is economic development. The half-gallon size growlers are an industry standard and are sold at breweries around the country, helping to expand the small businesses.

 

Amherst Brewing Company in Massachusetts, which locals call ABC, has gone through three expansions since the pub opened in 1997. Chloe Drew, ABC’s bar manager, said that growth has been helped by selling the 64-ounce growlers that fill two refrigerated cases at the front of the restaurant.

 

“It’s really good for small towns because they become a destination and people can bring stuff home from that destination. It’s probably only going to bring people back,” Drew said, adding that the Florida law is strange because anyone who wants 64 ounces could simply buy two 32-ounce growlers.

 

The Florida Beer Wholesalers Association, which represents all the state’s Anheuser-Busch distributors, is opposing the bill. Its lobbyist, Mitch Rubin, was able to convince Rep. Debbie Mayfield, R-Vero Beach, not to give it a hearing at the House Business and Professional Regulation Subcommittee she chairs. Without a House hearing, the bill is essentially dead.

 

Rubin said he is trying to protect the three-tier system of alcohol distribution the federal government set up after Prohibition. It basically ensures that alcoholic products are passed through a distributor to get to retailers. Exceptions have been made, however, for purchases where products are produced, such as buying bottles of wine at a winery.

 

State law does allow take-home sales at breweries, though Rubin argues that language was meant only to allow sales at Busch Gardens in Tampa when Anheuser-Busch brewed beer at what is now a major theme park. He said it was never intended to allow breweries to sell directly to consumers.

 

“It’s definitely operating in the gray,” said Rubin, who said he is not fighting the bill to boost distributers’ profits. “There’s a little to that, but the larger point is about the three-tier system, and that is our larger concern.”

 

At his urging, Sen. Maria Sachs, D-Delray Beach, tried to add a nearly 12-page amendment to Sen. Jack Latvala’s two-line bill. The amendment would have allowed 64-ounce growlers to be sold, but it also would have restricted take-home sales to only the smallest of startup breweries. The Senate Regulated Industries Committee refused to consider the amendment before approving the bill, though Rubin has likely succeeded in halting that measure as well.

 

Latvala noted that it’s hard for beverage laws to be changed because of the powerful lobbying of distributors. He pointed out that it took years for Florida to change a law that only allowed beer cans and bottles in sizes of 8, 12, 16 or 32 ounces. The law, until changed in 2001, kept many imported beers out of Florida because bottles were based on the metric system. Also banned at the time were 22-ounce bottles popular with microbreweries.

 

“It’s the same thing still going on. Those that have the sizes and those that have the distributorships are protecting that,” said Latvala, R-Palm Harbor.

 

Brewers say growlers and tasting rooms are an important part of growing business, especially when certain beers aren’t readily available in stores. A tasting room at Cigar City Brewing in Tampa, for instance, has helped the business grow from two employees in 2009 to more than 50 now, said owner Joey Redner.

 

The larger profit margins on beer sold at Florida breweries helps them reinvest the money to produce more beer, which creates more jobs. Unlike beer giants such as Anheuser-Busch and MillerCoors, which have automated systems that allow a few people to brew massive amounts of beer, craft brewing is labor intensive. In order to brew more, small breweries have to hire more people.

 

Redner said he believes the wholesalers association is opposing the growler bill to protect its profits, as growlers and brewery tasting rooms help craft brewers expand their market presence.

 

“Ninety-nine percent of their business is a large, foreign-owned company that makes 100 million barrels of beer. That’s where their bread and butter is. These craft breweries, that’s not what’s keeping the lights on for them,” Redner said. “If they can shut the tasting rooms down, they can get rid of some the competition.”

 

The Beer Industry of Florida, which counts MillerCoors distributors among its members, supports allowing the 64-ounce growlers because the industry group doesn’t see the jugs as a threat to the three-tier system, said BIF president Eric Criss.

 

The current rules can be frustrating for out-of-state tourists accustomed to the 64-ounce growlers. Luke Kemper, the owner of Swamp Head Brewery in Gainesville, said more and more often people visiting from other states are told their 64-ounce growlers can’t be filled. Likewise, if they buy a 32- or 128-ounce growler, they probably can’t fill them when they get home.

 

Chris Lashway of Fredericksburg, Va., recently stopped at Proof Brewing in Tallahassee while on his way to South Florida. He likes visiting microbreweries and said he would have liked to buy a 64-ounce container so there would be more to share with his hosts. Instead, he ordered a quart of red ale.

 

“It is very bizarre,” he said of the rules.

 

 

——

Michigan: Editorial: Liquor control updates progressing

 

Need to modernize regulations is key

 

Source: LSJ

Apr. 1, 2013

 

When considering examples of government bureaucracy run amok for its own purposes – rather than for the good of citizens – Michigan’s liquor regulatory process would be Exhibit A.

 

From archaic laws to the puzzling fact that regulations were managed differently in different parts of the state, Michigan’s liquor control process has earned justifiable criticism.

 

So a recent report that cites efforts to apply reason and conformity to Liquor Control Commission operations is most welcome indeed.

 

Gongwer News Service reported key changes last week:

 

. The wait time for permits has dropped nearly 45 percent, from 290 days to 162 days.

 

. More than 40 forms have been eliminated.

 

. The state’s four regional liquor control offices are no longer allowed to create local practices for how they will handle various applications. Instead, officials decided a 35-day review process used in the Grand Rapids office should also be used by offices in Lansing, Escanaba and Southfield.

 

The commission also is reviewing why some procedures meant to be fairly simple and straight forward were instead resulting in added investigations. Liquor Control Commission Chair Andy Deloney told Gongwer that one example involved the law that allowed current licensees to apply for Sunday morning sales. Regulators, he said, had created an additional investigation process that was not part of the legislation.

 

Meanwhile, a selection of bills continues through the legislature looking to modernize and improve existing liquor regulations. Among those changes are some meant to encourage entrepreneurial activity such as allowing small wineries to offer tastings at farmers’ markets or allowing some retailers to refill “growlers,” large containers intended to hold less than a gallon of beer. Other bills deal with allowing conditional licenses and numerous other details meant to update the law.

 

Some of those measures are drawing objections; doubtless the legislative process will help iron out various concerns.

 

But every one involved should keep in mind the paramount issue: Michigan’s outdated liquor control laws hinder small business owners, make it difficult for restaurant companies interested in coming into the state and, in some cases, do a disservice to the state’s burgeoning tourism industry. Liquor regulations should be sensible and evenly enforced.

 

Gov. Rick Snyder’s approach of reviewing both laws and enforcement with an eye toward efficiency and without sacrificing the overall need to regulate and tax alcoholic beverages is the right approach. Citizens will benefit as progress is made.

 

An LSJ editorial

 

 

——

New York: New York City Council Set to Impose Mandatory Paid Sick Leave on New York Restaurants, Bars, Wine and Liquor Stores

 

Source: MPSA

by The Law Offices of David A. Gabay, PC

Apr 1st

 

New York City small business owners are going to be required to provide paid sick leave and/or unpaid sick leave with mandatory job protection, starting April 1, 2014, according to a deal reached in the New York City Council late last week.

 

Here are the key provisions of the bill, according to the City Council press release, a Wall Street Journal article, a New York Times piece, and a story in the New York Post:

 

1. As of April 1, 2014, city employers with 20 or more employees must provide up to 5 paid sick days per year. Employers with less than 20 employees must provide up to 5 unpaid sick days per year, with job protection.

2. As of October 1, 2015, the employee headcount trigger drops to 15 employees.

3. Full time and part time employees are covered, seasonal employees are not.

4. Eligible employees must be on the job for at least 4 months.

5. Enforcement is done through Consumer Affairs (original proposal gave enforcement

to the lovely folks at the Health Department).

6. Fines range from $500-$2,500.00.

7. Employees cannot sue employers directly for non-compliance.

 

If you have questions or need more information on this issue or any other liquor license issue, please call or email David Gabay.

Liquor Industry News 3-26-13

March 26, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday March 26th

Biodynamic FRUIT Day And ROOT Night.

Taste Early!

Anheuser-Busch Discloses India Foreign Corruption Probe by SEC

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Duane D. Stanford

Mar 25, 2013

 

Anheuser-Busch InBev NV (ABI)’s India joint venture is being investigated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

 

“We have been informed by the SEC that it is conducting an investigation into our affiliates in India, including our non- consolidated Indian joint venture, InBev Indian Int’l Private Ltd., and whether certain relationships of agents and employees were compliant with the FCPA,” the company said today in a regulatory filing. “We are investigating the conduct in question and cooperating with the SEC.”

 

John Nester, an SEC spokesman, declined to comment.

 

The investigation is at an early stage and no claims have been asserted by regulators, Marianne Amssoms, an AB InBev spokeswoman, said today in an e-mail. AB InBev’s market share in India is about 2 percent, she said. Operations are run by an Indian subsidiary, Crown Beers India, and a joint venture with RKJ Group for local production, in which AB InBev holds a minority stake.

 

“We have an extensive compliance program which includes robust policies, training, and an employee hotline,” Amssoms also wrote. “We do not tolerate any violations and are fully cooperating with this investigation.”

 

Beam Inc. (BEAM), the distiller of Jim Beam, Maker’s Mark and Canadian Club liquors, said in October that it was investigating its operations in India after a report of possible FCPA violations.

 

AB InBev rose 0.6 percent to 75.43 euros today in Brussels trading. The shares have climbed 15 percent this year.

 

 

——

SABMiller Sees No Profit-margin Wall in Latin America

 

Source: Dow Jones

By Simon Zekaria

Mar 25th

 

SABMiller PLC (SAB.LN) Monday said it isn’t hitting a profit-margin wall in Latin America, even after the world’s second-biggest brewer by sales narrowed forecasts for its largest and most lucrative region.

 

The maker of Miller Genuine Draft and Peroni Nastro Azzuro targets its earnings before interest, tax and amortization margin in Latin America to grow by between 0.6 to 0.8 of a percentage point in the three to five years from fiscal year 2013. It previously set a medium-term growth forecast of between 0.6 and 1 of a percentage point in 2011.

 

“We are not saying we are hitting a wall. [We are not being] more pessimistic, we are being more precise,” said Karl Lippert, president of the brewer’s operations in Latin America, who was speaking at an investor conference.

 

SABMiller also targets 4% to 6% beer volume growth in the medium term, with revenue per hectoliter on a constant currency basis seen growing 3% to 5%. In 2011 it saw volumes growing 5% to 8%, with revenue per hectoliter on the same basis rising 2% to 4%.

 

“We believe we can continue to deliver mid-single-digit volume growth and upper-single-digit revenue growth for the foreseeable future,” Mr. Lippert said ahead of the meeting.

 

Latin America has accounted for over 40% of the group’s earnings growth before interest, tax and amortization since the fiscal year 2007, due to the brewer’s dominant market position in northern countries like Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. It is also strong in central American nations Honduras, El Salvador and Panama. Still, it cedes ground to rivals in the region’s biggest economies of Brazil, Argentina and Mexico.

 

While the brewer is driving revenue on higher prices thanks to an emphasis on premium beers, it is also targeting demand at the economy end of the market with larger bottles of mainstream lager brands like Aguila and Poker.

 

SABMiller says beer is still an expensive and aspirational product for many consumers, with around 80% of the population in SABMiller’s Latin American markets considered low-income consumers. A key part of SABMiller’s strategy in the region is to attract these consumers away from low-quality local spirits, often produced and sold illegally, by providing affordable alternatives in its portfolio.

 

At the end of January, the London-listed company said global beer volumes for the third quarter rose 2% before acquisitions and disposals, representing a slowdown from the 3% growth rate recorded a year earlier and 4% posted in the first half. Beer-volume growth in Latin America recovered to 6%, up from 4% in the first-half, but down from 8% in the same period last year.

 

 

——

SABMiller seeks to convert illegal alcohol drinkers

 

Lager giant SABMiller is hoping to boost sales in its biggest market, Latin America, by targeting drinkers who buy illegal beer and spirits on the black market.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Nathalie Thomas

25 Mar 2013

 

The world’s second biggest brewer has been trying to make beer more affordable for drinkers on low incomes in the region, through initiatives such as selling bigger bottles which can be shared among several people.

 

SAB, best known in Europe for brands such as Peroni and Grolsch, told investors yesterday that illegal alcohol accounts for more than a fifth of the market in the Latin American countries where it operates, offering opportunity for further significant growth in the region.

 

Problems around counterfeit and contraband alcohol are particularly acute in Colombia, Peru and Ecuador, where the black market can be controlled by powerful criminal gangs.

 

SAB is hoping that initiatives such as selling 750ml bottles of popular brands including Aguila and Poker, which work out cheaper when shared among several people, will help move more drinkers into the mainstream beer market.

 

It estimates that if all illegal alcohol buyers were converted into beer drinkers, the market would expand by 15m-19m hectolitres.

 

In Colombia, drinkers have to work for an average of 66 minutes to earn enough money to buy half a litre of beer, compared to just 12 minutes in Europe.

 

Although many Latin American economies are expanding at a rapid rate, many drinkers are still tempted to buy cheap bootleg alcohol.

 

“A lot of the illegal market is extremely inexpensive stuff,” said Randy Ransom, a senior vice president in SAB’s Latin American business. “Beer is aspirational, these people want to drink beer, they can’t afford it.”

 

SAB, which generated a third of its operating profits in Latin America last year, has been pursuing a similar strategy in Africa . The group expects to continue growing beer volumes at 4pc-6pc in Latin America, but admitted that it had come to a “stand still” in the fast-growth but highly competitive Brazilian market.

 

 

——

Device checks for poisonous alcohol

 

Source: Stuff NZ

LIZZIE WADE

25/03/2013

There’s nothing like suddenly going blind to spoil a good happy hour. Alcoholic beverages tainted with poisonous methanol are a scourge of the developing world, causing blindness and even death.

 

The dangerous drinks can come from botched batches of home-distilled liquor, but they often have a more sinister origin; criminal gangs will cut standard alcohols with methanol and sell the resulting concoctions to unassuming customers for inflated profits.

 

Because adding methanol doesn’t change the drink’s flavour, colour, or smell, there’s no easy way to tell if the brew you’re about to imbibe could poison you – until now.

 

Scientists in Colombia have developed a reusable wireless chip that can analyse a drink’s proportion of methanol to ethanol (the good kind of alcohol) and warn consumers of any danger, they have reported at the meeting here of the American Physical Society.

 

This first generation device costs about $5 and still requires an antenna, but within two years they hope to have a commercial product that sends easy-to-interpret results directly to a user’s cell phone. Until then, you might want to lay off the hooch.

 

 

——

Irish Town Legalizes Drinking and Driving

 

Law allows people to “to drive home from their nearest pub after having two or three drinks on little-used roads driving at very low speeds.”

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Patrick Hickey Jr.

Monday, Mar 25, 2013  

 

The Irish town of Kilgarvan passed a law this winter that allows members of its community to drink and drive.

 

Proposed by local pub owner and politician Danny Healy-Rae, the motion allows people who live in country areas to have a few beers before they drive home. Healy-Rae told The New York Times he thinks the measure will help preserve pub culture, lower the risk of suicide and attack isolation in the small town.

 

Amid governmental and local backlash, Healy-Rae says the law isn’t supposed to apply to everyone, mainly “elderly people who live in very remote places.”

 

“What is the alternative for them where no public or other transport is available? Staying at home lonely, staring at the four walls?” Healy-Rae told The Times.

 

Some local politicians are still shocked that the motion was passed, including one Kerry County council member who was absent when the measure passed because her child was sick, according to the Times.

 

 

——

Don’t stick taxpayers with huge drinking tab

 

Source: Wisconsin State Journal

Editorial

March 24, 2013

 

We knew it was bad.

 

But now researchers at the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute specifically have quantified Wisconsin’s horrible hangover from excessive alcohol use in a single year:

 

. 1,529 premature deaths.

. 48,578 hospitalizations.

. 60,221 arrests.

. 5,721 motor vehicle crashes.

 

Throw in lost productivity at work, higher insurance rates, greater health care costs, substance abuse treatment, law enforcement, incarceration and other expenses, and the tab is staggering: $6.8 billion annually – with nearly $3 billion of that total being picked up by local, state and federal governments in Wisconsin.

 

There’s no easy or single answer to changing our state’s heavy drinking culture. But one simple act would help curb that cost and discourage destructive behavior.

 

Wisconsin should raise its tiny tax on beer, booze and wine.

 

Current state liquor taxes bring in a total of $69 million a year, which is less than 1 percent of the total economic cost of abusive drinking in Wisconsin, according to the UW study released this month by Health First Wisconsin.

 

Wisconsin’s beer tax is the second lowest in the nation and hasn’t been raised in more than four decades – not since man walked on the moon.

 

Wisconsin’s beer tax is less than a penny per pint, and the liquor tax here is less than $1 per liter.

 

Raising the tax would bring in more revenue to combat the causes and effects of alcohol abuse. It also would reduce access to alcohol for teenagers, just as higher taxes on cigarettes reduced teen smoking.

 

Wisconsin ranks worst in the nation for binge drinking, defined as four or more drinks in a row for a woman, and five or more drinks for a man. The intensity of Wisconsin’s drinking also ranks worst, with adult binge drinkers here averaging nine drinks in a row, the UW study suggests, based on surveys.

 

Such excessive drinking doesn’t just affect the people getting blitzed. It hurts others by leading to drunken driving and related injuries and death, property damage, domestic abuse and other violence.

 

That means even responsible drinkers will benefit from paying a higher tax on beer, wine and booze. They’ll get more protection from the damage caused by excessive drinkers who get behind the wheel or otherwise risk injury and higher cost to taxpayers.

 

And the higher tax could potentially save drinkers more than it costs if the revenue is dedicated to treatment and enforcement.

 

Most of the politicians at the state Capitol will say they oppose higher taxes, especially on beer. Yet these are the same politicians who hiked the state tax on cigarettes to $2.52 a pack, which is one of the highest rates in the nation.

 

The high state tax on cigarettes was justified to deter teens and recoup some of the public health costs. For the same reasons, Wisconsin should jack up its tiny beer tax.

 

 

——

Rebate Coupon Fraud

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FAYE MITTELSTEADT, Defendant (Excerpt)

 

Source: Pacer

2012 DEC 13

 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES:

 

COUNT 1

 

Background

1. At all times material to this indictment:

 

a. Defendant FAYE MITTELSTEADT lived at N 847 Hilly Road, Merrill, Wisconsin.

 

b. Faye’s Flowers and More Garden Center operated as a floral and garden center at 361 N. Bradenburg Ave., Merrill, Wisconsin. The business was owned and operated by FAYE MITTELSTEADT and other family members. The business operated in the spring and summer months and was closed from the end of September through the winter months.

 

c. Certain liquor companies allowed consumers to obtain a refund on part of their purchase price by mailing a rebate form along with an original receipt showing the product purchased, price paid and date of purchase. In order to receive a refund check, the consumer was required to write down on the rebate form the 12 digit UPC bar code number located on the liquor bottle. The consumer was also required to list their name, date of birth, and address on the rebate form. The rebate forms listed certain rules for obtaining a refund. These rules included: (1) only one refund per household name and/or address per offer code; (2) only originals of the rebate form and the original cash register receipt would be accepted; (3) rebate checks would only be mailed to the name of the requestor and only if the requestor lived in the same state where the product was purchased. The rebate form also gave notice that any fraudulent submissions could result in federal prosecution under the mail fraud statute.

 

Scheme To Defraud

2. During the period beginning in or about January 2008, and continuing to on or about November 10, 2010, in the Western District of Wisconsin and elsewhere, the defendant, FAYE MITTELSTEADT, knowingly and with the intent to defraud, devised and participated in a scheme to defraud liquor companies and rebate processing centers, and to obtain money and property by means of false and fraudulent pretenses, representations and promises.

 

3. It was part of the scheme that the defendant submitted fake cash register receipts purportedly from Nick’s County Market to support non-existent liquor purchases which she claimed on liquor rebate forms that were mailed to rebate centers.

 

4. It was further part of the scheme that the defendant used the names and addresses of family members as nominees on some of the rebate forms to obtain refund checks in an effort to circumvent the rule prohibiting one rebate per household.

 

5. It was further part of the scheme that the defendant intentionally misspelled her name, and those of family members, on the fraudulently submitted rebate forms, in an effort to conceal and disguise the scheme.

 

6. It was further part of the scheme that the defendant deposited the fraudulently obtained refund checks into a Park City Credit Union joint savings account.

 

7. It was further part of the scheme that the defendant used a Royal cash register from her business — Faye’s Flowers and More Garden Center. This register did not work properly and the defendant moved it to her home. The defendant programmed the cash register to issue fake cash register receipts.

 

8. It was further part of the scheme that the defendant received over $13,867 in refund checks from these false submissions.

 

Mailing

9. On or about the dates listed below, in the Western District of Wisconsin, the defendant, FAYE MITTELSTEADT, for the purpose of executing this scheme, knowingly caused to be delivered by mail according to the directions thereon, the following item: 1 2-16-10 Rebate form in the name Merrill, Wisconsin Salvador’s Refund of Ron Mittelsteadt, with Dept. 10 cash register receipt from P.O. Box 6037 Nick’s County Market Douglas, AZ 85655-6037 showing purchase of liquor on 1-30-10

 

 

——

Stoli owner places bid for CEDC

 

Source: The Spirits Business

by Becky Paskin

26th March, 2013

 

SPI Group, along with a consortium of other investors, has made a bid for embattled Russian vodka group Central European Distribution Corp (CEDC).

 

The consortium, which also includes A1 – a division of Russia’s Alfa bank – and CEDC shareholder Mark Kaufman, made an offer for the Poland-based drinks group for US$280 million cash and $650m in new debt to restructure the group.

 

In exchange the consortium would receive 100% of reorganised equity in CEDC.

 

The bid comes after CEDC, which owns the Zubrowka, Green Mark, Absolwent and Parliament brands, defaulted on the exchange of $257bn worth of notes that were due to mature on 15 March.

 

“SPI has a fantastic ability to help those brands develop an export business,” said Val Mendeleev, CEO of SPI Group. “Our products are currently distributed in 167 markets worldwide and we can certainly add CEDC brands with high potential – particularly in the USA where we’ll have our own distribution company from 1 January”

 

CEDC currently holds just under 6% of the entire vodka category, but crippled by debt, its shares have floundered and hit 44 cents in March in New York, down 80% on the start of the year.

 

A letter to the CEDC board, written on behalf of the consortium: “The Consortium is confident that this new proposal constitutes the most attractive offer available for the Company and 2016 note holders and substantially improves our previous term sheet.

 

“This is true not only in immediate and evident monetary terms but also from the point of view of CEDC’s financial position and liquidity as well as future development.”

 

Roust Trading owner Roustam Tariko, already a major shareholder in CEDC and holder of around $102.6m of the 2013 notes, has also made a bid for the company. He offered to buy the notes he doesn’t own – approximately $155.3m – for $25m in cash and $30m in secured notes issued by Roust.

 

“CEDC continues to believe that a successful restructuring will improve its financial strength and flexibility, and enable it to focus on maximizing the value of its strong brands and market position,” the group stated. “The restructuring is expected to have no effect on CEDC’s operations in Poland, Russia, Hungary or Ukraine, all of which will continue doing business as usual.”

 

 

——

Why Beer Marketers Don’t Spend Much on Joe Six-Pack Anymore

 

Subpremium Suds Like Busch, Keystone Light Yield ‘Fast Nickels,’ But Advertising More-Expensive Brews Brings in “Slow Dimes’

 

Source: Ad Age

E.J. Schultz

March 25, 2013

 

With the beer market inundated by fruity flavored brews, pricey craft brands and Justin Timberlake ads, what ever happened to Joe Six-Pack?

 

He’s still there, chugging cheap beers after work, but brewers are dedicating fewer dollars to reach him as the “subpremium” segment declines. Instead, beer marketers, on a quest for fatter profit margins, are encouraging drinkers to trade up to pricier line extensions such as Bud Light Platinum or new concoctions like Redd’s Apple Ale.

 

Brewers are advertising economy brands less: Measured-media spending on the five largest low-end brews — Natural Light, Busch Light, Busch, Miller High Life and Keystone Light — fell to $6.9 million last year from $22.4 million in 2011, according to Kantar Media. That compares with the $32 million that Anheuser-Busch InBev spent last year launching Bud Light Platinum. Redd’s Apple Ale, introduced by MillerCoors this year, is getting a similarly hefty push, while the brewer last week launched the first national TV ads for Leinenkugel’s that spotlight its lemonade-flavored Summer Shandy offering, whose sales soared 90% last year, according to the brewer.

 

Add in the fact that the economic downturn hurt blue-collar drinkers the most and the result is that the sub-premium segment has been on a long-term slide, falling to 13.5% in 2012 from 15.7% of beer sales at supermarkets in 2009, according to SymphonyIRI. During the same period, craft-beer sales grew to 11.9% from 8.3%, while so-called superpremium beers, like Blue Moon and Shock Top, jumped to 10.7% from 9.1%.

 

How has beer been able to get consumers to trade up in a sluggish economy? “It comes down to emotional engagement,” Trevor Stirling, a beverages analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, said. “Consumers are much more likely to “brand’ themselves by what they drink, be it a quirky, heavily hopped IPA, or a “sophisticated’ Stella; whereas Natty Light and Beast Light have, if anything, negative brand badging.”

 

New drinkers — think Joe College — are a lot more experimental than they used to be, sampling craft beers, cocktails and flavored malt beverages, rather than relying on the same old Keystone or Natural Light. Younger drinkers “grew up with so many different flavors that it’s not unusual for them to want to try different things,” said Dan Wandel, SymphonyIRI’s senior VP-beverage alcohol client insights.

 

Marketers have also spurred the shifts by hiking prices on subpremium brands. A-B InBev for the past few years has been closing price gaps between mainstream beers like Bud Light and its value brands in an effort to rebalance its portfolio — and the American beer market at large — toward premium beers. “Our strategic intent is to grow our share of the value segment, but without growing the segment itself,” said Edison Yu, VP-value brands at A-B InBev.

 

Still, big brewers cannot risk alienating economy drinkers for fear of losing them to cheap liquor or smaller beer brands like Pabst Brewing Co.’s Pabst and Old Milwaukee, whose locally targeted, quirky Will Ferrell ads have gotten a ton of free media attention.

 

There are signs that A-B InBev and MillerCoors this year are paying a bit more attention to their low-end brands, rolling out new packaging, campaigns and promotions. The goal is to protect share in a segment that still accounts for 18.4% of dollar sales, according to SymphonyIRI. Although declining, the segment is still larger than imports (14.4%) and crafts (5.4%).

 

“When you are a big mega-brewer like [A-B InBev] or MillerCoors, you are looking to be all things to all people,” said Benj Steinman, president of Beer Marketer’s Insights. “And if subpremiums are 20% of the business, you damn well want to play there.” Economy brands are more about “fast nickels” than a “slow dime,” said Ashley Selman, marketing director-economy brands at MillerCoors. “We make less per barrel, but we sell a lot of volume.”

 

As they narrow their focus, value brands are zeroing in on core drinkers. Keystone Light is replacing its “Keith Stone” ads that targeted younger drinkers with a partnership with tournament-fishing organization FLW. Its mostly in-store campaign targets Walmart-shopping, middle-age drinkers.

 

Busch is seeking to hook more anglers with a limited-time promo this spring in which 50,000 special “fishing-lure” cans will be randomly inserted into cases. Fans who upload pictures of the cans to the Busch Facebook page can win prizes, including a fishing trip with star angler Kevin VanDam.

 

Miller High Life is launching a campaign that plugs the beer’s role in “everyday celebrations,” teaming with Harley Davidson for in-store promotions that tout the fact that both brands are turning 110 years old this year.

 

Despite the competition from crafts, economy brands are not giving up on younger drinkers. A-B InBev’s Natural Light, which targets college-age consumers, is seeking to stand out with new “stubby” bottles, dubbed “Fatty Natty,” rolling out nationally. MillerCoors is targeting hipsters with its Hamm’s brand via grassroots marketing.

 

The brew is part of the marketer’s “classic” economy-brand lineup, which is meant to compete with crafts. “These guys are still challenged by the economy,” Ms. Selman said. “And they don’t have the money to buy crafts all night long.”

 

 

——

Wine fraud lawsuit is a test of bottle for billionaire Bill Koch

 

Court case due to begin in New York brings to light claims of widespread counterfeiting in the world of fine and rare wines

 

Source: The Guardian

Matt Williams in New York         

24 March 2013

 

It has aged for six years, but the uncorking of a wine-fraud lawsuit in a Manhattan court on Monday looks set to leave a rather nasty – and potentially costly – aftertaste.

 

Brought by one of America’s richest men, Bill Koch, against Eric Greenberg, a businessman who himself was once reportedly worth $1bn, the case will also put a spotlight on what some experts have claimed has been a scourge of the wine market for years: counterfeits. At the heart of the matter are a couple of dozen bottles that were purchased for up to $30,000 each, but may have turned out to be less than vintage. In the process of testimony that could last up to four weeks, the court is expected to hear of alleged underhand tactics used by some retailers and auction houses to offload suspect plonk.

 

It is a lawsuit with a heady body: nuclear scientists, dodgy wine labs and allegations of a culture of fraud all feature in the civil action brought by a man whose single-minded trail of those he deems responsible for flooding the wine market with fakes has seen him likened to Captain Ahab, the pursuer of Moby Dick.

 

Certainly the money pumped into the case is of whale-like proportions. Greenberg’s lawyers say Koch – who is worth an estimated $4bn – has ploughed “seven or eight million” dollars into the case. The total worth of the wines in question runs into hundreds of thousands of dollars. Koch, who is an avid collector of many things – including ‘wild west’ memorabilia and nautical instruments – launched his lawsuit in 2007, against both Greenberg and the New York auctioneers Zachys. It followed the discovery, during an inspection, that a number of bottles gathering dust in his impressive cellars were counterfeit.

 

Some of the suspect bottles are alleged to have come into the possession of Koch through a single-seller auction at Zachys in October 2005. That sale saw Greenberg offload nearly $10m worth of wine in one go. It is claimed that in an effort to offset his shrinking fortune, the founder of the internet companies Scient and Viant sold some $50m of his cellar’s contents.

 

The fine print in at the Zachys’ sale catalogue warned of buyer beware, stating “prospective bidders are invited to inspect the property before bidding”. Lawyers for Koch say that is an unreasonable demand on a would-be buyer. “It would have taken Koch’s expert, Michael Egan, at his current rate of 36 bottles per 15 hours, more than 7,000 hours, at a cost of nearly $1m, to inspect all 17,000 bottles,” the billionaire’s legal representatives argued in pretrial memorandum of law.

 

Moreover, they claim that the seller already knew that many of the bottles – some of which were allegedly bought from Royal Wine Merchants, a New York-based specialist in French Bordeaux and Burgundy – were fake. Greenberg was allegedly tipped off by international auctioneer Sotheby’s that some of the bottles were not authentic, when it declined to sell the collection. Sotheby’s suspicions were later confirmed by a team of nuclear scientists and chemists brought in by Greenberg to analyse the bottles and labels.

Allegations of fraud

 

But it was not just Greenberg’s cellars that had been infected by fakes. The civil action lifts a veil on just how rife allegations of fraud were in the fine wine market in the mid-2000s.

 

On learning that Royal was behind the sale to Greenberg, Sotheby’s head of wine, Serena Sutcliffe, allegedly claimed the wine collector that “the guys at Royal are crooks”, and that anything the company sold was likely to be fake, according to a filing by Koch’s lawyers. Greenberg subsequently threatened legal action against Royal Wine Merchants and around February 2004 he returned $362,941 worth of wine to the seller, according to court documents filed by Koch’s team. In a statement to the Guardian over the weekend, Royal Wine Merchants said it was “incredulous” over the allegation included in Koch’s legal filings, adding that it was “the stuff of fantasy”.

 

Sam Israel, Royal’s legal counsel, added: “Royal has enjoyed a reputation as a top-tier distributor of authentic fine wines.”

 

Koch says Greenberg concealed what he knew about some of his wines. Koch’s lawyers claim he told a house manager: “What they did to me, I’m going to do to somebody else,” adding that the comment was taken to mean he intended to offload counterfeit wines. It is alleged that Greenberg first tried to sell magnums of purported 1945 Château Lafite and 1921 Cheval Blanc through Acker Merrall & Condit.

 

But the auction house’s president, John Kapon, expressed concerns. According to documents filed by Koch’s legal representatives, Greenberg was “fucking pissed” and wrote to Kapon stating: “If my [magnums] are good enough for Zachys, they are good enough for anyone else.”

 

The allegedly rejected 1945 Lafite was amongst those bought by Koch. Other bottles purchased at the 2005 Zachys auction included an 1811 Lafite, for $29,172, and a 1870 bottle described in auction as “one of the all-time greats”. All were found to be among the fakes, Koch’s lawyers claim.

 

The apparently counterfeit bottles were identified by William Edgerton, a noted wine expert employed in 2007 by Koch. Lawyers for the billionaire claim that while Edgerton was examining Koch’s cellars, he stumbled across bottles that he had marked as potentially counterfeit during an earlier inspection of Greenberg’s collection.

 

‘He’s like Ahab’

 

The lawsuit against Greenberg is part of a campaign by Koch to tighten up practices at wine sales and to pursue those he believes to be responsible for fraud through the courts.

 

The brother of fellow billionaires David and Charles – who are noted funders of conservative causes in the US – Bill has been allegedly stung in the rare wine market before. He alleges that wine he brought through Christie’s, which is purportedly from the estate of third US president Thomas Jefferson, is inauthentic. Last year, a court in the US ruled that he had left it too long to bring a lawsuit against the auction house. A lawyer for Christie’s told Bloomberg that the court ruling was “clearly correct”.

 

The decision has seemingly emboldened his drive to pursue the latest court action.

 

“He’s like Ahab,” Greenberg’s spokesman, Bill Cunningham, told the Guardian on Friday. “Eric offered to him a refund and offered to have a charity event in which experts tasted the wines. Koch turned down the refund and the charity offer.” Koch’s lawyers confirmed that an offer was made, but that the billionaire returned Greenberg’s cheque.

 

Zachys was dismissed from the complaint last year, with the two sides reaching a undisclosed settlement, but Cunningham said on Friday that Greenberg’s legal team expected the case against their client to go to trial as scheduled. “I do not think anybody is confident. We are up against a billionaire with massive resources who has spent the last seven years pursuing this,” he said.

 

Greenberg’s lawyers maintain that their client is not responsible for Koch’s wine woes. They note that Greenberg was not mentioned in the Zachys sale catalogue and that the auction house inspected and selected the bottles to be sold. “They were not selected by Eric Greenberg,” Cunningham said. In any event, Greenberg’s lawyers have stated in court documents, “Koch cannot establish his claims.”

 

What doesn’t appear to be in question is that fake wines were present in both men’s collections. “There is no question that anybody with an extensive collection of wines and who buys from auctions may have inauthentic wines. Every collector has fake bottles in his collection,” said Cunningham.

 

“No one doubts that there were counterfeit or inauthentic wines in [Greenberg’s] collection. But what we are concerned with is firstly that Eric Greenberg did not select the wines for auction and did not knowingly sell inauthentic wines. Secondly, even the experts do not agree [about what wines are fake].”

 

Cunningham said that of the 24 bottles in question, even Koch’s experts cannot agree which ones are fake.

The Kurniawan connection

 

The civil trial is being paired with a criminal one slated for later this year as having the potential to blow the lid off fraud in the fine wine sector. Last year, one of the most prominent wine dealers in America, Rudy Kurniawan, was arrested and charged as the alleged head of a counterfeit wine laboratory that had fooled the wine world for eight years. It is claimed that from his Californian home, Kurniawan – who also goes by the names of Dr Conti and Mr 47 – mixed low-priced wines to mimic the tastes of far more expensive ones.

 

According to his indictment, he would then pour the creations into empty bottles of rare wines procured from a restaurant in New York City, and complete the fraud by fitting the bottles with fake labels that he created using stencils and rubber stamps. The finished counterfeits would then be sold for up to $50,000 a bottle, prosecutors say.

 

Kurniawan’s trial is expected later this year. But his name is likely crop up in the civil case that is due to commence on Monday. In legal documents, Koch’s lawyers allege that in late 2003, Greenberg bought wines from the alleged counterfeiter. Greenberg’s representatives accept that their client bought from Kurniawan, but say “so did many other people” and add that he did not know the purchased bottles were fake.

 

It has been claimed that actions like those alleged to have been conducted by Kurniawan have caused the fine wine market to be flooded with fakes in recent years. Maureen Downey, a rare-wine expert who is set to give evidence as part of the Koch civil action, said: “The media has only been aware of this in the last couple of years, but the most blatant fraud was going on in 2004 to 2009. At that point there was industry pressure to clean up. It is my belief that when the pressure ratcheted up, there was some wholesale dumping in Asia.”

 

She added that the majority of fakes are still around, with their true price unknown to the collector. “Absolutely – most of it is still out there. I find them all the time, everywhere.”

 

 

——

China as a Vast Wine Market

 

Australian Vintner Plans to Open Outlets in Country to Create a Taste for Luxury Brands

 

Source: WSJ

By LAURIE BURKITT And JASON CHOW

March 24th

 

Australia’s Treasury Wine Estates Ltd. TWE.AU -3.38% is planning to open wine bars or restaurant and entertainment outlets in China in a bid to get the country’s consumers drinking luxury wines-not just giving them as gifts.

 

The winemaker intends to unveil its own wine outlets in the next three to five years, said David Dearie, Treasury’s chief executive. The goal is to help consumers learn more about wine and drink more of it, said Mr. Dearie, noting that it is too early to disclose details. Currently it sells in China only through distributors.

 

China’s appetite for wine is growing, with consumption in 2012 up 20% from the year before. Jennie Mack of Asia Wine and Services Education Center tells the WSJ’s Jake Lee what kinds of wine the Chinese are drinking today.

 

“If you’re going to make great wine and be a leading brand in China, you also have to be consumer-oriented,” Mr. Dearie said.

 

China’s wine market has exploded in recent years, spurring major competition among winemakers who have flooded the market and are now looking to differentiate themselves. Sales of wine reached 257 billion yuan, roughly $41 billion, in 2012, up 20% from a year earlier, according to research firm Euromonitor International.

 

But wine consumption per capita in China is still a fraction of that in other countries. Chinese drinkers consumed only 1.4 liters of wine per person in 2011, far below the French average of 53.2 liters per person, according to the most recent data from London-based research company International Wine & Spirit Research. It predicts China’s per capita consumption will increase to 2.1 liters per person over the next three years.

 

Mr. Dearie said higher-quality import wines are often given as gifts between businessmen to be stashed away rather than swilled. And while Treasury is rolling out some of its priciest wines to be used as gifts, the company hopes that with wine bars or restaurants it will encourage actual consumption of the wine.

 

Mr. Dearie said the move toward entertaining hasn’t been influenced by China’s recent austerity campaign, in which catering and wine companies have been hurt by a ban on government banquets.

 

Local vineyards and wine retailers have already started opening bars, restaurants, clubs and shops with the option to drink on premises, like state-owned Cofco Corp.’s Chateau Junding wine-club chain. Aussino World Wines, a Chinese wine retailer with shops in more than 100 cities in China, runs lounges in China’s southern city of Guangzhou.

 

Executives of liquor giant Diageo DGE.LN -0.71% PLC, which recently launched its second flagship bar in China, say its Johnnie Walker Houses have been successful in helping Diageo identify its VIP consumers and to sell exclusive products that can boost the brand and its profit.

 

Fongyee Walker, a Beijing-based wine consultant, said winemakers have to be creative in China, adapting to local habits. “People in the West buy to consume at home; in China, they buy to consume with friends when they’re out,” Ms. Walker said.

 

Mr. Dearie said Treasury-which sells in China wines such as a high-end Penfolds Grange for around 7,594 yuan, or about $1,222, and a low-end Rosemount Diamond Label for 160 yuan-is working with one of its distributors toward opening a 6,000-square-meter wine gallery, for tasting events, in Shanghai.

 

He said he has no plans to develop special blends to suit China’s flavorful food, which doesn’t adhere well to the traditional pairings dictating, for example, that red wine goes with beef.

 

Treasury, spun off from Foster’s Group Ltd. in 2011, is investing 15 million Australian dollars (US$15.7 million) in its Australian-based winery Magill Estate, in part to attract Asian visitors, Mr. Dearie said. He said they are working with tourism boards and are boosting infrastructure so that Asian tourists can store wine there or ship wine from the Magill Estate.

 

The company is also increasing its presence at duty-free shops around the world and holding tastings there so Asian tourists can learn more about premium brands like its 1,874 yuan Wolf Blass Platinum Label, he said.

 

Treasury’s sales by volume to China and Hong Kong rose 31% in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 from a year earlier.

 

Mr. Dearie said Treasury’s business in China is profitable. He declined to offer further details.

 

Treasury’s net profit increased 31% to A$52.3 million in its fiscal first half ended Dec. 31 on a reported-currency basis.

 

 

——

Single-Serving Wine for Sipping Small

 

Source: New York Times

By FLORENCE FABRICANT

Mar 25th

 

Buy me some pinot and Cracker Jack! Pinot grigio, California merlot, cabernet sauvignon and chardonnay are now sold in sealed single-serve plastic goblets. Next month, Zipz, the company behind this new format, will introduce them at baseball stadiums, including Citi Field (hear that, Mets fans?), and at wine shops.

 

A couple of entrepreneurs in Miami have also entered the single-serve fray with the Vini, which sells California wines in 187-milliliter (quarter-bottle or quartino) glass vials with screw caps. Bottled in Sonoma, they are far more elegant than the plastic goblets, though you need a straw or a glass for drinking. Zipz claims its varietal wines are “premium,” though “ordinary” is more like it. The Vini calls its blends, mostly zinfandel from Napa and chardonnay from Sonoma, “exceptional,” which is another overstatement: Zipz wines, about $4 each or $14 for a four-pack, will be sold starting in mid-April at Yorkshire Wines and Spirits and zipzwine.com. They will also be sold at Citi Field and other sports venues. The Vini, $35 to $40 for a four-pack, is sold at thevini.com.

 

 

——

German wine exports continue downward trend

 

Source: Decanter    

by Panos Kakaviatos in Düsseldorf

Monday 25 March 2013

 

German wine exports slid by 15.2% in 2012 compared to 2011, continuing a declining trend from the previous year, according to statistics released by the German Wine Institute.

 

The drop in the volume of exports in 2012, to 1.3m hectolitres, follows an 11.8% drop in exports in 2011.

 

While exports in 2012 to some smaller markets showed gains, a ‘significant decline’ in exports to high-volume sales markets like the US, Great Britain and Russia led to the decline, according to a press release issued on the eve of Prowein, Germany’s largest international wine fair, held in Düsseldorf.

 

The German Wine Institute said the decline was due in part to a smaller 2010 crop and ‘fiercer competition’ for lower priced wine segments. Import regulation changes in the Russian market also led to lower exports there.

 

The value of wines exported also dropped by 7.8% in 2012. This figure is less striking because the average price per litre of wines sold increased, indicating ‘a trend towards selling higher quality wines,’ German Wine Institute managing director Monika Reule said.

 

But given the declines overall, Reule called for ‘intensive and continuous public relations work in foreign markets to regain lost market shares.’

 

 

——

Brunello vandal gets four years in jail

 

Source: the drinks business

by Lucy Shaw

25th March, 2013

 

The vandal who destroyed six vintages of Case Basse Brunello di Montalcino from his former employer has been sentenced to four years in prison.

 

Andrea Di Gisi, 39, from Rome, was sentenced in a Siena court last Friday, and received two years fewer in prison than the prosecutor requested.

 

According to Montalcinonews.com, Di Gisi, who has been dubbed “The Brunello Killer” in the Italian press, is planning to appeal the sentence.

 

On announcing the jail term, Case Basse owner Gianfranco Soldera also said in a statement that he was resigning from the Brunello di Montalcino consorzio.

 

On 2 December last year, 62,600 litres of Brunello were lost after the taps to the barrels were opened by Di Gisi, who entered the cellar by breaking a window.

 

Once inside, he opened the valves of 10 barrels, allowing wine from the last six vintages: 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012 to flow down the drain.

 

The act of vandalism resulted in a commercial loss in the region of ?10m.

 

Di Gisi allegedly carried out the attack out of revenge, and was said to have been angry that he hadn’t been given accommodation on the estate while working there.

 

Located in the south-west of Montalcino, the 23-hectare Case Basse estate was bought and restored by Soldera, a former insurance broker from Treviso, in 1972. It produces around 10,000 bottles each year.

 

The vintages of Case Basse Brunello that have been destroyed will now become a rarity, with only a few small barrels of each vintage remaining.

 

Having halted the sale of Case Basse Brunello after the attack in December in an attempt to prevent price speculation, Soldera will begin selling the wine again at the end of this month.

 

 

——

Ontario’s wine industry worth $7B: Study

 

Source: Canoe Money

By Patrick Gallagher, QMI Agency  

Mar 25th

 

Every bottle of wine produced in Ontario creates spinoff benefits worth $40, an economic impact study found, adding up to a national economic impact of almost $7 billion and more than 31,000 jobs.

 

The report was commissioned by the Canadian Vintners Association and other provincial wine associations.

 

Ontario residents alone drank 84 million bottles of wine last year, while almost two million people visited a winery in the province, the report found.

 

Nationally, Canadians enjoy more than 220 million bottles of wine produced by the domestic wine industry each year.

 

“The impacts are both direct and indirect, from job creation and tourism to tax generation and agricultural growth, the wine industry benefits multiple business sectors across the entire Canadian economy,” said Dan Paszkowski, president of the Canadian Vintners Association.

 

Wineries in B.C. are second to those in Ontario in terms of economic output, with a spinoff at about $2 billion.

 

 

——

TY KU Premium Sake & Spirits Announces Expanded Partnership with Southern Wine & Spirits of America

 

Source: SWS

March 25, 2013

 

Mel Dick, President-Wine Division & Senior Vice President, Southern Wine & Spirits of America, Inc. (Southern)-the country’s leading wine and spirits distributor-announced today that TY KU Premium Sake & Spirits-a leading supplier of premium sakeand the fastest-growing sake brand in 2011 and 2012 as rated by Nielson-has extended its distribution agreement with Southern across the country. This brings the two companies’ alignment for TY KU’s entire portfolio of premium products to 25 U.S. markets where Southern is present-and another 9 markets for TY KU’s spirits portfolio.  The TY KU/Southern alliance is effective immediately.

 

Regarding the expanded relationship, Dick said, “Southern Wine & Spirits is proud to have TY KU Premium Sake & Spirits across a majority of our markets.  We are excited about the dynamic sake category and impressed with TY KU’s growth since its launch just a few short years ago. We see great promise for the category, the TY KU brand, and the positive message of friendship and respect embedded within the TY KU ‘Share On’ campaign.”

 

 

——

Paul Draper crowned the 2013 Winemakers’ Winemaker by IMW and db

 

Source: the drinks business

by Andy Young

25th March, 2013

 

Californian legend Paul Draper has been named the 2013 Winemakers’ Winemaker by the Institute of Masters of Wine and the drinks business.

 

The award was presented at a ceremony at ProWein in Düsseldorf by Jean-Michel Valette MW, chairman of the Institute of Masters of Wine.

 

Recognising outstanding achievement in the field of winemaking, the award is now in its third year, with previous winners being Peter Sisseck of Dominio de Pingus and Peter Gago of Penfolds.

 

As chief winemaker at Ridge Vineyards in California since 1969, Paul was chosen as the recipient of this year’s award by a panel that comprised Master of Wine winemakers from all over the world and the previous winners of the award.

 

Paul said: “This honour means so much to me because of my respect for the Masters of Wine – and most especially for the winemakers among them, who have such a breadth of knowledge of wine as well as expertise in my chosen vocation.”

 

In particular the judging panel recognised Paul for an approach that has been characterised by an emphasis on traditional winemaking practices, sustainable agriculture and a sense of place. He has been a pioneer in the popularising of single estate winemaking in California, and was instrumental in the growing recognition of Zinfandel as an important regional grape variety.

 

Ridge Monte Bello 1971 achieved international renown when it was included in the famous Judgement of Paris tasting in 1976, in which Cabernet Sauvignon wines from California were shown to compare very favourably with top French wines from Bordeaux when tasted blind. In the 30th Anniversary tasting of the same wines in 2006, Ridge Monte Bello 1971 emerged as the winner.

 

Mr Valette said: “It’s a delight for me, as a fellow countryman, to be presenting this award to Paul Draper. Paul has done so much for winemaking in the United States, and, in his quiet way, has been a beacon of winemaking excellence and inquiry to so many. It’s a privilege to have this opportunity to show the respect in which he is held by his peers worldwide.”

 

 

——

‘Kentucky Bourbon History’ author sees story of US in evolution of whiskey

 

Source: Courier Journal

Written by Matt Frassica

Mar. 25

If you’ve spent any time reading the back labels of bourbon bottles, you’ve heard about them – the pioneering farmer-distillers, swashbuckling moonshiners and crooked tax agents who lent their names or family recipes to each brand.

 

Judging by the number and variety of these origin stories, there are enough colorful characters in the history of America’s native spirit to populate a whole aisle at one of the big-box liquor stores.

 

These figures constitute what historian Michael Veach calls “marketing history.” “Salesmen have been the same for thousands of years, and if they can stretch the truth or make up a truth that fits their needs to sell more product, they will do so,” Veach said. “That’s been around for the whole history of the bourbon industry.”

 

Veach should know. For the past 20 years, Veach has studied the history of bourbon distilling, earning a place in the Kentucky Distillers Association Bourbon Hall of Fame. His new book, “Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey,” published by the University of Kentucky Press, came out earlier this month.

 

“Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey” is one of the only histories of the industry written for a general reader available from a mainstream publisher. With reviews in places like The Wall Street Journal and a recent interview with Veach on the public radio show “Marketplace,” the book seems destined to become an important source for anyone looking to learn more about the history of Kentucky’s famous juice.

 

“I am the luckiest student to come out of the University of Louisville history department,” Veach said on a recent afternoon in the living room of the Filson Historical Society’s Third Street mansion, where he is associate curator of special collections and regularly holds classes on the history and appreciation of bourbon.

 

As a graduate student at the university in the early 1990s, Veach studied medieval history. He heard that United Distillers wanted a graduate student to build an archive of its historical materials. It offered $9 an hour, 35 hours a week, for six weeks. “As a grad student who hadn’t worked full time in a while, that sounded very good to me,” Veach said.

 

What started as a six-week project turned into a full-time job after he graduated, and Veach held it until the company sold its bourbon brands and closed the archives in 1996. The Filson then offered Veach a job, where he has continued his work on the history of the industry.

 

“The more I got to studying it, I realized the history of the distilling industry really is the history of the United States,” he said. “The first constitutional crisis is the Whiskey Rebellion,” caused by the whiskey tax that the federal government levied to pay off the debt of the Revolutionary War.

 

“You look at the Industrial Revolution, the evolution of technology through the 19th century – it’s mirrored very well in the distilling industry, going from a cottage industry of farmer-distillers all the way up to the modern column-still distilleries that are huge business ventures worth millions of dollars.”

 

If you can see American history reflected in the history of the bourbon industry, you can see our thirst for a good story in all that marketing copy. “Right after the Civil War in particular is when you start seeing bourbon playing up on the romanticism of the earlier days,” Veach said. Even in 1860, Jack Beam named a whiskey brand Early Times to hark back to the good old days.

 

No story is more hotly contested than the origin of bourbon itself. If you believe what Heaven Hill says on every bottle of Elijah Craig, its namesake invented Kentucky bourbon by aging corn whiskey in charred oak barrels.

 

Veach views such claims with professional skepticism. “Elijah Craig was a distiller, and he was a Baptist minister. There’s no lie in that,” he said. “Was he the inventor of bourbon? Probably not.”

 

In the book, Veach offers his own theory of bourbon’s origin. In Veach’s version of the story, sometime after 1807, John and Louis Tarascon, French immigrants who owned a mill and warehouse in Louisville, may have come up with the idea to age whiskey in charred oak as a way to imitate the taste of French brandy, which was popular among the French population in New Orleans at the time.

 

“The Tarascon brothers were in a great position to buy whiskey cheap, they were in trade with New Orleans, they knew about French brandy, they knew about what people in New Orleans were drinking,” Veach said. “It just makes sense to me.”

 

But, he cautions, it is just a theory. “The fact of the matter is, we are never going to know who invented bourbon,” he said. “Bourbon, I think, is more of an evolution than an invention.”

 

 

——

DG to surpass 11,000 stores in ’13

 

Source: RT

By Mike Troy

March 25, 2013

 

Fourth quarter same store sales increased 3% at Dollar General as the company capped of another record year and indicated it would open 635 stores this year.

 

Total sales for the company’s 13 week fourth quarter ended February 1, increased 0.5%, to $4.21 billion compared to $4.19 billion during the 14 week fourth quarter the prior year. Excluding the extra week from the prior year’s fourth quarter, sales would have increased 8%. The company said its same store sales increase was driven by consumables and a mix of increased transaction size and customer traffic.

 

Net income for the fourth quarter was $317 million and earnings per share totaled 97 cents, compared to net income of $293 million, or earnings per share of 85 cents, which benefitted by six cents because of the extra week.

 

“Dollar General had yet another outstanding year in 2012 including exceptionally strong fourth quarter results,” said chairman and CEO Rick Dreiling. “We grew our market share and invested strategically to continue to win with our customers. These results demonstrate the strength of our business strategy, and we believe we are very well-positioned for future growth.”

 

During 2012, the Dollar General opened 625 new stores and remodeled or relocated 592 other stores to end the year with a total of 10,506 stores. It said it expects to open another 625 new stores this year and remodel or relocate 550 stores. The company has previously indicated the U.S. market is capable of accommodating as many as 20,000 Dollar General stores.

 

In 2013, the expansion of selling space and the upgrade of existing square footage is expected to combine with same store sales growth in the 4% to 6% range to produce total sales growth in the 10% to 12% range. Full year earnings per share are expected to total between $3.15 and $3.30.

 

 

——

Dollar General: when shopping lists

 

Retailer’s customers could be crimped by delays in tax refunds

 

Source: FT

March 25th

 

Higher US payroll taxes and how they will affect retailers is a vexing question for investors this year. Take Dollar General, one of a few “dollar stores” that offer a hodgepodge of low-priced items, everything from packaged food to razors to clothing. On the one hand, there are fears that low income households will be the hardest hit from higher taxes, hurting sales at places such as Dollar General. On the other, most of their sales are from consumables and the company stands to benefit from the prospect of consumers with lower take-home pay “trading down”. A third factor is the improving US economy, which could cause some shoppers to trade up instead.

 

On Monday, Dollar General reported a 3 per cent increase in same-store sales in the three months ended February 1, at the low end of in-house guidance for a 3 to 4 per cent increase. But Dollar General was able to preserve margins, in spite of some concerns late last year about heightened competition and net profit beat analysts’ forecasts.

 

The company expects sales and profit growth in 2013, but warned that they will be stronger in the second half of the year, partly due to the rollout of cigarettes in its stores – a bid to boost traffic. It faces a tough first-quarter comparison – same- store sales rose 6.7 per cent a year ago. Cold spring temperatures versus last year’s warm weather also are not helping. And, in addition to payroll tax changes, Dollar General’s customers could be crimped by delays in tax refunds this year. Just ask Walmart.

 

The uncertainty helps to explain the stock’s performance on Monday: a range of up 6 per cent to down 0.5 per cent. At 16 times forward earnings, it trades in line with its historic multiple. Dollar General is opening new stores, but investors had still better believe that higher taxes are neutral or will lure more dollar shoppers.

 

 

——

Deals not driving restaurant traffic

 

Offers must be revamped to attract younger diners, NPD researchers say

 

Source: NRN

Lisa Jennings   

Mar. 25, 2013

 

Deals and discounts did not drive restaurant traffic in 2012 as much as they did in prior years, and operators need to re-engineer offers to appeal to younger diners, according to research released Monday by The NPD Group.

 

Restaurant visits driven by a deal or discount declined 3 percent for the year ending in December 2012 compared with the prior year, according to Port Washington, N.Y.-based NPD’s foodservice market research.

 

Researchers blamed the decrease in deal traffic on the increased reliance on bundled meals and value menu offerings, tactics that many restaurant chains used last year with the hope of weaning consumers off of straight discounts.

 

“Deals and special offers definitely influence restaurant visits, and if it weren’t for deals during the recession, the industry would have fared much worse, but some of the deals being offered today aren’t resonating with consumers,” said Bonnie Riggs, restaurant industry analyst for NPD.

 

In 2008, when consumers were hit hardest by the recession, restaurant visits based on deals or discounts rose 5 percent, while non-deal traffic fell 1 percent, NPD said. That trend continued into 2009, when deal-related traffic rose 3 percent, while non-deal traffic declined by 4 percent.

 

By 2012, however, those trends were reversed. Deal-related restaurant traffic fell 3 percent last year, and non-deal traffic rose 2 percent.

 

One factor may be that many restaurant deals, such as “two for $20” lunch deals in casual dining, have been in place for several years now. “After certain deals have been in the marketplace for a while, they become the norm,” Riggs explained. “It becomes no longer a deal to consumers.”

 

In addition, in the quick-service world, in particular, the disparity between deal and non-deal pricing is shrinking, she added. That factor has hurt traffic among younger consumers specifically, an age group that continues to be very price sensitive.

 

Going into 2013, value remains top of mind for all consumers, especially as the payroll tax increase and rising gas prices take a toll on discretionary spending, said Riggs. NPD has projected that overall traffic overall will remain slightly negative in 2013, especially among full-service restaurants.

 

The NPD report, “Planning for Growth in the New Normal Marketplace,” explores how restaurant operators can rethink their value message. “Considering current consumer sentiment and their continuing frugality, the deals that have historically appealed to restaurant customers need to be re-engineered and the next generation of deals introduced,” Riggs said.

 

Restaurant operators are going to have to get more innovative and creative, she noted. “They’re going to have to make deals seem like something new and different.”

 

Coupons – especially those available on restaurant company websites – continue to be traffic drivers, Riggs said, while bundled meals and value menus are not as effective in getting diners through the door.

 

“People tend to want a discount on regular menu items, things they like,” said Riggs, rather than targeted items with low prices. “You can have something that costs $1, but if it’s not decent quality and doesn’t taste good, it’s not worth $1.”

 

 

——

Arizona: Inside the liquor department’s covert underage buyer operation

 

Source: CBS 5

By Lindsey Reiser

Mar 25th

 

We all know bars and restaurants are supposed to be checking identification cards, but we also know not all do. So there are police officers and teenagers out there doing undercover work to keep them on their toes.

 

The Arizona Department of Liquor has a CUB program, in which CUB stands for covert underage buyer. The Arizona Department of Liquor sends in a teenager with their real IDs to try and buy alcohol. If they’re successful, the cops are there to bust the sellers.

 

“You never know what we’re going to run into in the night,” said Sgt. Wes Kuhl with the Arizona Department of Liquor. They go on CUB stings a few times a month. This time, they let us tag along.

 

“We get some sort of complaint that a location is selling to an underage,” Kuhl said. “We can only check those places per state statute.”

 

After they get the complaint, the undercover officers check it out, usually by sending in the CUB.

 

“Not every high schooler gets the opportunity to go and do undercover work,” said one of the CUBs, Zack, who will soon retire because a CUB cannot be older than 19. Zack said he usually gets a buy 50 percent of the time.

 

“I’ve had friends who’ve gotten hurt from drinking alcohol and from other teenagers drinking alcohol in car accidents and whatnot,” Zack said.

 

“In 2012 we had a buy rate of about 38 percent, so approximately four out of 10 places have sold alcohol to our underage buyers,” Kuhl said. He said that number seems a little high, considering all restaurant, bar, and liquor store owners learn about this program when they get their license.

 

“It’s no surprise, we’re not trying to deceive anybody, we’re just checking compliance,” Kuhl said.

 

On this sting, we went to nine different places that sell alcohol. First, one of the liquor department’s undercover cops walks in. Then, the CUB follows a few minutes later.

 

At our first few locations, the bars and restaurants turned the CUB away like they’re supposed to, like Poppy’s Place in Tempe.

 

“I asked for his ID immediately because he looked really young,” said Nicole Vidana, a waitress who refused to serve Zack.

 

If the place is compliant, they’ll get a letter from the liquor department saying they passed the test. But not everyone gets that pat on the back. At Valley Fair Liquor Store in Tempe, we followed close behind and saw the clerk sell a beer to the underage buyer.

 

The clerk that sells the alcohol gets arrested for selling to a minor, which usually leads to a fine. The establishment also gets cited, which can range from a fine to revocation of their liquor license.

 

On our sting, only one other location sold to the CUB – Dave’s Place in Phoenix.

 

And while there’s surely other places the undercover officers would rather be on their Saturday night, they know the CUB program is vital to keeping the peace.

 

“Our job is to protect the public and protect the safety of the underage people and also people on the streets of Arizona,” Kuhl said.

 

We reached out to the managers of both locations that failed the CUB challenge, but we have yet to hear back. In the 10 years the CUB program has been in place, they’ve visited nearly 3,000 bars, restaurants, and liquor stores and about a third of them failed the test.

 

 

——

Egypt: Egypt’s Islamist rulers get tough on alcohol

 

Drinkers say rises in taxes on beer and wine suggest hardliners are gaining more power in Mohamed Morsi’s government

 

Source: The Guardian

Patrick Kingsley

Sunday 24 March 2013

 

In 6 October City, a new sprawl of malls and mansions just west of the capital, locals say there is only one shop that sells alcohol. Its name is Bazaar al-Gamaa, and if you ask its owner, Abu Ramez, nicely, he will fetch you a bottle of vodka from the storeroom. In the fridges opposite the till, there are crates of local lagers: Sakara, Meister, Rex – and Stella, an award-winning Egyptian lager unconnected to its Belgian namesake. “That’s my favourite,” said Ramez, who has been an off-licence owner for 22 years. “Low alcohol percentage. Better for my liver.”

 

But now, Ramez has more to worry about than his beer consumption. Last month, Egyptian authorities announced plans to ban alcohol sales in new developments outside Cairo. Most worryingly for Ramez, they said existing licences would not be renewed in towns beyond the capital – towns such as 6 October City, a satellite development built in 1979 of about 1 million people.

 

To add to the gloom, the government doubled beer tax to 200% this month, with wine tax rising from 100% to 150%. Then last Monday, the civil aviation minister mooted banning alcohol from duty-free shops in airports. For many liberals, this triple blow adds to the impression that Egypt’s Islamist-led government, headed by President Mohamed Morsi, intends to turn the country significantly more conservative.

 

“If this government continues on this same path, we’ll be like Saudi Arabia,” said Akram, assistant manager at Charwood’s – one of a handful of restaurants that sell alcohol in 6 October City – who preferred not to give his surname. The planned licence ban had been discussed at management level, Akram said, and there are concerns that it could affect business. “Most of our guests are foreigners or Egyptians who drink alcohol,” he explained.

 

But other restaurateurs were more relaxed. “It’s not relevant,” argued Rafaat Habib, manager at the nearby Piccolo Mondo, who said his restaurant’s alcohol licence is sourced through its head office in the capital. “Our licence is connected to Cairo.”

 

Habib’s nonchalance may also derive from a wider expectation that the authorities lack the political will to enforce new licensing legislation.”The thing about licences – it’s a thing to scare people,” said Ramez, stocking his fridge with a recent Stella delivery. “When they make these questionable laws, it’s the people who will decide whether to enforce them. It’s not actually going to be implemented. In Port Said, they had a curfew, and no one followed that. They’re a failed government and no one’s going to listen to the things they’re trying to enforce.”

 

In any case, for all the talk about Egypt’s Islamisation, countered one of Ramez’s customers, many Egyptians would not adhere to a licensing ban. “It wouldn’t make a difference,” said Emam Hussein, a logistics manager, popping in to buy vodka. “There are tonnes of people who drink, even the religious. There are tonnes of Copts and tonnes of Muslims who drink underground.”

 

“We will never allow our country to become a fundamentalist country,” Ramez added. “As long as we keep on talking and speaking, no one will be able to change Egypt in this crazy manner.”

 

Even a high-profile Islamist politician sends his driver to pick up a crate of beer every week from Bazaar al Gamaa, Ramez claimed.

 

Yet beneath the bravado, there were hints of a more pressing danger. “On the phone I get a lot of threats saying ‘we will burn down your shop,'” said Ramez. “I responded very aggressively and I said that they should go ahead and do it. We won’t let them get to us. If it comes to violence, so be it.”

 

Others in the alcohol business were reluctant to speak on the record. Many Egyptian drinkers source their alcohol from delivery companies such as Gocheers or Drinkies. But when the Guardian visited Gocheers’ headquarters, no one was available for interview, or willing to say whether remotely located delivery services would be affected by the licensing change. Drinkies was also reluctant to be drawn on the subject, conscious – one employee said – of keeping a low profile.

 

“We are in close contact with stakeholders to remind them that we are an important employer in the country,” a spokesman for Drinkies’ owners – Al Ahram breweries – said in a statement. Al Ahram is owned by Heineken, which therefore controls the vast majority of Egyptian alcohol brands, including Stella and Sakara beers and popular wines such as Omar Khayyam. The spokesman pointed out that Al Ahram employed more than 2,000 people, and was “strategic for the tourism industry, which is a key driver of the Egyptian economy”.

 

In general, claimed Akram at Charwood’s, some Egyptians were wary of being seen as too fond of alcohol. “After the fall of Mubarak, there wasn’t really a government, and people had more freedom – so people drank more,” he said of his customers. “But eventually there reached a point when the customers became a bit more fearful and they didn’t want to be seen downing a whole bottle. They just drank a glass.”

 

This apprehension is derived from the government’s open conservatism, Akram argued. “There’s a much stronger group in power that’s out to implement their laws,” he said. “Before one person might tell them drinking is against religion. Now you have an entire group in government saying this. So people are more afraid in public.”

 

But Ramez had other ideas. “If [the government] wanted to prevent alcohol sales,” he said, “then they would have banned it [completely]. But they just want to raise more taxes.”

Liquor Industry News 3-21-13

March 21, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Thursday March 21st

Biodynamic FLOWER Day

Great To Taste Wine!

Spirits Giants Toast High-End Clientele

 

Source: WSJ

By SIMON ZEKARIA

Mar 20th

 

Whiskey at $120,000 a bottle might not be everyone’s drink of choice, especially amid a global economic downturn. But that doesn’t matter to drinks giant Diageo DGE.LN -0.49% PLC: The company is offering the exclusive tipple only to a group of 200 VIP patrons, carefully selected and invited to join its Chinese whiskey “embassy” in Beijing.

 

Focusing on aspirational drinkers and wealthy individuals in fast-growth markets is a priority for liquor companies.

 

Diageo’s so-called embassy, partly an exclusive members club to sell luxury Scotch, offers private access to a whiskey vault, as well as a bar, museum, shop and dining from an in-house chef. Once in the vault, a customer can be advised by a master blender who will personalize a signature bottle of whiskey, along with a bespoke decanter.

 

Two such embassies are already up and running and Diageo wants to roll out more, first across Asia and then world-wide as the company seeks to cash in on the top end of the liquor market.

 

Pernod Ricard SA, RI.FR +0.16% meanwhile, is striving to appeal to high-net-worth individuals through its sponsorship of polo, a sport traditionally frequented by multimillionaire enthusiasts. Its Royal Salute whiskey brand is the sponsor of the World Polo Series, with tournaments played across the world. Christian Porta, chairman and chief executive of Chivas Brothers, the company’s whiskey division, said the brand has recorded double-digit sales growth in emerging markets over the past five years.

 

The whiskey embassies aren’t the only way Diageo is wooing its most valuable customers. Its John Walker & Sons Voyager luxury yacht set sail in September on a six-month voyage to nine Asian ports, with top customers invited aboard, including an opening three-day party on the Shanghai Bund.

 

“All the guests were invited to a lavish dinner accompanied by the finest whiskeys available,” said Malaysian entrepreneur William Ng, a guest on the ship. “[The] yacht was an event not to be missed and was the talk of town.”

 

The premium and high-end Champagne and spirits industry-in which bottles cost more than $20 each-has almost tripled in value to $72 billion in the past 10 years, according to data group International Wine & Spirit Research. That is despite the economic downturn, which has prompted customers of lower-price spirits to cut back on consumption and change habits to favor drinking at home rather than in bars, where margins are higher.

 

The exclusive, high-profile marketing events have helped drive consumption of Diageo’s most premium brands. Johnnie Walker Blue Label might not retail for thousands of dollars, but its cost of about $200 a bottle still makes it one of the most expensive blended Scotches available on the general market. The brand’s sales in China have increased 45% since 2011, when Diageo’s first whiskey embassy opened in Shanghai.

 

RI.FR +0.16% In Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as Africa, Diageo posted a double-digit gain in fiscal first-half operating profit. As Diageo mostly sells premium spirits, this is a sure sign that “premiumization”-an upselling strategy that is the Holy Grail of beverage companies-is gathering pace, analysts say.

 

In economically depressed Western markets, some drinkers are treating themselves, giving premium spirits categories a boost. Pernod Ricard says Havana Club rum posted improved sales for the first six months of the fiscal year, driven by Europe. “If you cannot afford to drink as much as you could, [you] can definitely drink less but better quality,” says Euromonitor International analyst Spiros Malandrakis.

 

In North America, Diageo’s reserve brands-or luxury division-posted double-digit sales growth for the six months ended in December, said Larry Schwartz, Diageo’s president in the region, with strong trading from upscale vodka brand Cîroc, as well as Bulleit Bourbon. Cîroc sales, excluding acquisitions, disposals and currency effects, rose 14%.

 

But while consumption is increasing for the high-end market, supply isn’t necessarily keeping pace. Pernod Ricard Chief Executive Pierre Pringuet says restricting access can be more beneficial than meeting demand, as the drinks giants chase value over volume. “It is up to us to make our brands so desirable,” he says. “We couldn’t envisage doubling the volume of Scotch in the medium term. [It is the] same for cognac. There is an element of scarcity.”

 

Diageo Chief Executive Paul Walsh agrees and says that even an economic crisis can lead to rewards elsewhere. “If there is a silver lining to the cloud of southern Europe, we are not selling as much young Scotch in markets like Spain and Greece as we were. We can hold on to that liquid longer and sell it into Latin America, Asia and Africa, probably as 12-year-old and make a lot more margin.”

 

Still, Diageo is trying to reach high-end drinkers in greater numbers through the launch of a Web portal in February to push direct global sales of the company’s ultra-premium brands. The Alexander & James site will offer drinks such as Zacapa XO-a blend of 25-year-old rums-at £99 ($150) a bottle, and the John Walker, a rare Scotch blend that retails at more than £2,000.

 

Alexander & James Managing Director Philippa Dickson describes it as a “white-glove, end-to-end luxury-brand experience, where people will be able to learn about our spirits and receive expert advice on food pairing and mixology ideas for every occasion.”

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Liquor privatization – Vote could come tomorrow (Today)

 

Source: Philly.com

Angela Couloumbis,

March 20, 2013

 

The state House debated for less than two hours Wednesday on a bill to privatize wine and liquor sales in Pennsylvania, setting the stage for a historic vote on the issue.

 

House members could vote as soon as Thursday afternoon on a plan backed by Gov. Corbett to turn over the state’s 600-plus liquor stores to the private sector. Utah is the only other state with government-run wholesale and retail liquor operations.

 

It was not clear whether Corbett’s fellow Republicans had the votes to pass the bill. But Wednesday’s 108-91 defeat of a Democratic bid to gut the bill suggested that the GOP may have the 102 votes needed to send it to the Senate.

 

If the House passes the proposal, it would be the farthest a liquor-privatization bill has moved through the legislature since the birth of the State Store system when Prohibition ended in 1933.

 

“Everybody in this chamber recognizes that our current system for selling alcohol in Pennsylvania is an anachronism, it’s old-fashioned, and it needs to be changed,” Rep. Kate Harper (R., Montgomery) said in Wednesday’s debate.

 

The decks were cleared for a Thursday vote when Democrats who oppose the bill withdrew dozens of amendments that had House officials gearing up for a long night.

 

The version awaiting a vote is different from Corbett’s original proposal, which called for an aggressive auctioning of State Store licenses to the private sector, including supermarkets, convenience stores, and big-box stores.

 

Revisions made this week in a committee would slow the transition to the private sector and limit what some retailers could sell. Money raised by auctioning off the stores would still go to public schools, as Corbett had envisioned – but House Republicans say the revised plan would generate $800 million, not the $1 billion his administration projected.

 

The bill calls for 1,200 liquor licenses statewide. Beer distributors would get first crack and could choose between applying just to sell wine or just liquor, in addition to beer if they did not want to sell all three.

 

Also unlike Corbett’s proposal: Grocery stores could sell only wine unless they applied for a special license to sell beer as well. That license would require them to have a restaurant-style seating area.

 

Finally, the revised bill would not immediately shut down State Stores. They would be phased out and some could remain open in rural areas.

 

The union representing State Store retail clerks has warned that passage of the bill would cost 5,000 jobs.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Beer world – The distributors get most breaks in liquor reform

 

Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

March 21, 2013

 

The latest version of Pennsylvania liquor reform is a beer distributor’s dream. Want to add wine and spirits to the inventory? Go ahead. Just want wine? That’s OK, too; the license for hard liquor will be held in abeyance in case the beer distributor has a change of heart.

 

Under an amended liquor privatization plan that could come up for a vote as early as today, beer distributors get all sorts of advantages over other private merchants looking to obtain any of the state’s proposed 1,200 retail wine and spirits licenses. And consumers would be left with not as much convenience as they deserve.

 

First, the 1,138 beer distributors get first crack at the licenses. They have 12 months to apply, and only after that would the option open up for others.

 

Second, the rates that distributors would pay for a license are a fraction of what it would cost other businesses. For instance, a beer distributor in Allegheny County would pay $82,500 for a wine and spirits license, but another applicant would be charged $397,500. And only beer distributors would be eligible for four-year financing from the state by paying a 5 percent fee.

 

Third, the beer distributors would continue to be insulated from competition on selling beer. Although grocery stores could get licenses to sell wine, their ability to sell beer would be restricted, as it is now, to separate registers in a cafe section of the market.

 

Lawmakers were wrong to think the bill would be a slam-dunk if they kowtowed to the state’s beer distributors. The trade associations that represent them still don’t like the legislation. Why? The groups want to keep things just as they are, which is why they’ve been among the impediments to reform for a long time.

 

The sad thing about House Bill 790 — amended from the better plan proposed by Gov. Tom Corbett — is that the liquor system it would deliver is an improvement over what Pennsylvania has today. Although the movement away from state-owned, state-operated stores would be too gradual and slow, at least it would eventually get the state out of the wholesale and retail alcohol business. In other words, things would be worse if nothing changes.

 

That may be a weak argument for urging the House to pass the measure, but advancing the legislation would mean the Senate could start making significant repairs to this necessary reform. And Gov. Corbett should put his muscle behind that.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Anheuser-Busch, MillerCoors, Pennsylvania breweries oppose liquor privatization bill

 

Source: Penn Live

Ron Southwick

March 20, 2013

 

Even as the state House of Representatives is poised to vote on a bill to put liquor sales in private hands, the beer industry is fighting the legislation.

 

Anheuser-Busch and MillerCoors, the two giants of the American beer market, have put their names on a letter objecting to the bill. The letter states that the bill as it stands now is “detrimental to the beer industry.” Combined, Anheuser-Busch and MillerCoors account for three out of every four beers sold nationwide.

 

The Brewers of Pennsylvania, an advocacy group for Keystone State breweries such as Yuengling, Troegs Brewing Co., and Appalachian Brewing Co., has signed onto the letter and distributed it to lawmakers. The Pennsylvania Beer Alliance, which represents the state’s beer distributors, has also signed the letter.

 

The state House is poised to vote on the privatization bill Thursday and it appears there may be enough votes to pass it. Gov. Tom Corbett has placed his clout behind it, saying it is a top priority. However, the measure still must pass the state Senate, and some senators have problems with the bill.

 

In the letter, the brewers don’t spell out objections to the idea of privatization itself. Rather, they say the bill as it stands would hurt the beer industry.

 

The brewers state that the legislation would hurt beer distributors and tilt sales unfairly to the wine industry. The bill allows for hundreds of additional wine and spirit licenses.

 

In the letter, the beer industry contends that the bill doesn’t provide a level playing field for beer sales in grocery stores.

 

Grocery stores would be able to sell unlimited amounts of wine anywhere in the store, the brewers say. Conversely, the bill spells out that beer sales would remain in a restaurant section of the store, and sales of beer would be limited to the maximum equivalent of a case (24 bottles).

 

The privatization bill “would create approximately 800 new ‘Grocery Store’ licenses authorizing the sale of unlimited amounts of wine anywhere in a grocery store and, thereby, creating a very uneven playing field in the grocery store segment,” the letter states.

 

“And because it pertains only to wine, there will be supermarkets where wine will be the exclusive alcohol beverage option and no beer will be sold.”

Behind the Scenes of a Yuegling Ad Campaign The Brewers of Pennsylvania, which represents Yuengling and other breweries, objects to the privatization bill as it stands now.

 

In addition, the letter states that the bill poses a threat to beer distributors, who may have to devote half their shelf space to wine and spirits. Some distributors say they can’t afford a costly expansion to maintain their current beer selection and add wine and spirits.

 

Beer distributors sell about two-third of all beer sold in Pennsylvania, so the industry is wary of doing anything to hurt distributors.

 

Anheuser-Busch, the makers of Budweiser, Bud Light and Michelob beers, accounts for roughly half of all beer sold in the United States. MillerCoors, which makes Miller Lite, Coors Light and Blue Moon, racks up more than a quarter of American beer sales.

 

D.G. Yuengling & Sons, makers of Yuengling Lager, is the largest American-owned brewery and accounts for about 2 percent of beer sales. Yuengling is just ahead of Boston Beer Co., makers of Samuel Adams beers.

 

In a revamped liquor market, the question of shelf space could be even more important to the state’s smaller breweries, such as Troegs, ABC, Stoudt’s Brewing Co. in Lancaster County and Victory Brewing Co. in Downingtown, All are members of the Brewers of Pennsylvania.

 

The state’s microbreweries rely on distributors to reach customers. If distributors have to clear shelf space for wine and spirits, smaller microbrews could be the casualties.

 

Corbett and Republican lawmakers who have pushed for privatization have insisted that privatization would lead to bigger business. They argue that the private industry would do a better job selling beer and wine and they contend that it’s time to get the state government out of the liquor business.

 

Pennsylvania’s business advocates, including the Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry, strongly support privatization. They argue it will lead to more choices and convenience for customers.

 

Under the bill, beer distributors would get first crack at 1,200 wine and spirit licenses. After a 12-month period, the licenses would go up for grabs to the general public.

 

Beer distributors would also be able to sell beer by the six-pack and in growlers.

 

Here’s the full content of the brewers’ letter opposing the legislation, dubbed House Bill 790. 

 

http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2013/03/anheuser-busch_millercoors_pen.html

 

 

——

United Kingdom: Distillers rue dual treatment over duty escalator

 

Source: FT

By Louise Lucas and Mure Dickie

March 20th

 

There was a showdown in the pub when George Osborne, chancellor, allowed brewers to step off the duty escalator but kept on raising taxes for distillers – including Scotch whisky, one of the country’s big export success stories.

 

The dual treatment angered distillers and politicians. John Swinney, Scottish finance secretary, said: “There are already concerns that his small beer Budget will cost Scotland’s whisky industry, with warnings over future investment.”

 

Analysts accused the chancellor of pandering to the populist vote: Britain boasts more beer drinkers and Mr Osborne’s “penny off the pint” is aimed at reversing the dwindling ranks of pubs, some 10,000 of which have gone out of business in the past decade.

 

But spirits makers, quick to condone the inequitable treatment, said that even if designed to support pubs, the measure was “misplaced”.

 

According to the Wine and Spirit Trade Association, more than 41 per cent of drinks sold in pubs are wine and spirits, worth £9.4bn a year. “The chancellor’s decision ignores the growing value of the English wine industry and the UK spirits industry, which accounts for 18 per cent of all jobs in the EU spirits industry,” said Miles Beale, WSTA chief executive.

 

The Association of Licensed Multiple Retailers, however, reckons that on average beer makes up 60 per cent of alcohol sales in pubs, to 12 per cent for spirits and 13 per cent for wines. “There is no doubt this is a life saver to some of the traditional pubs and bars,” said Kate Nicholls, strategic affairs director.

 

Michael Laird, a partner at Cognosis, a drinks consultancy, said targeting wine and spirits was more to do with PR. “Osborne is playing politics to a certain extent. Beer is massively taxed here compared with Europe so there is little more he can do on beer taxation anyway,” he said.

 

Producers of Scotch, which contributes £134 a second to the UK trade balance and supports 35,000 jobs across the UK, were also left fuming. The decision is “unfair, incomprehensible and undermines one of Britain’s major industries in its home market”, said the Scotch Whisky Association.

 

It said drinkers of a dram are now paying 48 per cent more duty than a beer drinker, further distorting the alcohol drinks market in the UK.

 

The UK is the third biggest market for Scotch and now boasts the fourth highest taxed market in Europe: of the EU member states, only Ireland, Finland and Sweden are higher.

 

Distillers paid just shy of £3bn on duty last year; assuming constant consumption, that will rise to £3.12bn with the latest rise of 5.26 per cent. The government reckons the tax cut on beer, which generated tax revenues of £3.4bn last year, will cost it £170m next year from the cancellation of the duty escalator and the penny off a pint. Beer sales have been declining at roughly 4 per cent a year since the duty escalator was introduced in 2008.

 

Diageo dubbed the move “disappointing”. The world’s biggest distiller, which has earmarked £1bn for investment in Scotland for Scotch whisky over the next five years, said: “Cutting duty on beer while increasing it on spirits punishes the UK spirits industry for its success in this harsh economic climate. Scotch is the UK’s biggest food and drink export. This move risks that success.”

 

According to the SWA, the 5.3 per cent increase in spirits duty sees a standard 70cl bottle of Scotch whisky jump to £12.89 from £12.42.

 

“The Scotch whisky industry?.?.?.?is a vital part of the Scottish and UK economy and where it supports many other businesses. It penalises responsible drinkers who like a dram rather than a pint. There is no justification for spirits being taxed more heavily than beer,” said Gavin Hewitt, SWA chief executive.

 

“It also damages all the good work done to create fairer tax regimes overseas to provide a fairer playing field for Scotch whisky. It hinders the government’s ambitions for an export-led recovery.”

 

 

——

United Kingdom: Preferential treatment for beer ‘could be illegal’

 

Wine and spirits producers slammed the Chancellor’s decision to reduce duty for beer but raise tax on other alcohol as “unfair and incomprehensible”, claiming the move could be illegal under European law.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Nathalie Thomas

20 Mar 2013

 

From Sunday, 10p will be added to the price of a bottle of wine in the UK while spirits will go up by 53p, after the Chancellor decided to press ahead in the Budget with a 5.3pc rise in alcohol duty.

 

Beer will be the one exception after the Government bowed to pressure from brewers to scrap the controversial “beer duty escalator” and reduce duty on a pint by 1p.

 

The escalator raised duty on beer by 2pc above the retail prices index measure of inflation every year and was blamed for accelerating the decline of traditional community pubs in Britain. However, an escalator will continue to be applied to other categories of alcohol, including wine, spirits and cider,.

 

The Wine and Sprit Trade Association said it made “little sense” to single out beer and claimed there was a legal precedent to suggest the Government could not treat other forms of alcohol differently.

 

Alcohol producers believe a ruling made by the European Court of Justice in 1983 that the UK’s duty regime at the time discriminated against wine in comparison with beer still applies.

 

Miles Beale, chief executive of the WSTA, accused the Chancellor of “riding roughshod” over the legal precedent.

 

He pointed out that more than 41pc of drinks sold in pubs are wine and spirits, generating £9.4bn a year. “If this was designed as a measure to support pubs it seems highly misplaced,” he said.

 

The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) called the move “unfair” and “incomprehensible” and claimed it undermined one of Britain’s major industries in its home and third most important market.

 

A standard 70cl bottle of Scotch Whisky will rise to £12.89 from £12.42 as a result of the duty increase.

 

“There is no justification for spirits being taxed more heavily than beer,” said Gavin Hewitt, chief executive of the SWA. “It also damages all the good work done to create fairer tax regimes overseas to provide a fairer playing field for Scotch Whisky.”

 

Diageo, the world’s biggest drinks company, said: “Cutting duty on beer while increasing it on spirits punishes the UK spirits industry for its success in this harsh economic climate. Scotch is the UK’s biggest food and drink export. This move risks that success.”

 

However, the British Beer and Pub Association disputed the WSTA’s claims that the move was illegal. It pointed out that since 1983, Ireland and Denmark have enforced different duty regimes for wine and beer.

 

 

——

Mexico: Rivals demand share of Mexican beer market

 

Source: FT

By Adam Thomson in Mexico City

Mar 20th

 

Ask for a beer in almost any bar or restaurant in Mexico, and the waiter will rattle off half a dozen brands with all the ease and familiarity of reciting the alphabet. The problem is that the names will almost certainly belong to just one company.

 

For decades, Grupo Modelo, which produces Corona Extra and is half-owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev, and its main rival Cuauhtémoc-Moctezuma, which Netherlands-based Heineken acquired from Mexico’s Femsa in 2010, have used exclusive contracts with retailers to compete in Mexico’s roughly 70m-hectolitre-a-year market.

 

In the process, the two incumbents have made it nearly impossible for other producers to gain a foothold. Together, they control about 97 per cent of sales – Modelo, of which AB InBev is trying to buy the outstanding equity for $20.1bn, controls about 59 per cent of the market; Heineken has roughly 38 per cent.

 

But an unlikely combination of SABMiller, the world’s second-largest brewer, and a handful of local microbreweries is trying to change things. In the coming days, the companies hope that Mexico’s antitrust authority will support their complaint against exclusivity contracts – a move that they believe could blow open the country’s beer market to genuine competition for the first time.

 

“All we are looking for is market access,” Armando Valenzuela, SABMiller’s director-general in Mexico, told the Financial Times in a recent interview. “We want to make sure that no beer outlet has an exclusive agreement with any one company.”

 

The imminent ruling, which the country’s antitrust authorities say involves one of the biggest cases they have ever handled, coincides with a new administration in Mexico that appears determined to prise open long-protected sectors of the economy – from oil to cement and from bread to paint.

 

In one sign of changing attitudes to competition, Emilio Lozoya, who heads Pemex, the state oil monopoly, told the FT recently that he was optimistic about reform of the energy sector this year that would open up Mexico’s highly protected oil sector to private capital.

 

The new pro-business government headed by centrist President Enrique Peña Nieto has also announced a proposal to increase competition in telecommunications and television – a change that could affect some of the biggest corporate interests in Mexico, including those of América Móvil, the pan-American telecoms company controlled by Carlos Slim, the world’s richest man.

 

Jaime Andreu, owner of Cervecería Primus, a Mexican microbrewery that has joined SABMiller’s cause, says that thanks to Modelo and Heineken’s exclusivity contracts, only about one in 20 businesses – bars, restaurants and shops – that his network of sellers visits in search of business is potentially able to take his beer.

 

“It’s an everyday experience,” he explains. “They all say that they love the product and then they say that they can’t sell it.”

 

For entrepreneurs, particularly small-scale ones, contracts with the dominant market players are near irresistible. In their intense competition to win new business from each other, the two incumbents often offer support for those setting up new bars or restaurants. On offer? Refrigerators, tables, chairs and awnings, as part of commercial deals.

 

One owner of a bar in downtown Mexico City, who asked not to be named, said Modelo offered practically to furnish his entire premises in return for an agreement to sell its products on an exclusive basis.

 

“I would have preferred to offer a wider range of beer,” he says. “But when you are starting out, you need the support.”

 

The two incumbents have defended exclusivity contracts, arguing that they can provide credit to retailers, improve the look of retail outlets for customers, and create jobs and stimulate beer sales. They also say that the vast majority of the contracts do not specifically prohibit retailers from selling competing brands.

 

When asked about the forthcoming antitrust case, both Cuauhtémoc-Moctezuma and Grupo Modelo said they had no comment.

 

Critics insist it is hard to underestimate the effect of the exclusivity deals on competition. Mr Valenzuela of SABMiller, with its 200 brands, a presence in 70 countries and annual revenues in excess of $30bn, says that 20 years of trying to pick Mexico’s lock has resulted in a market share of just 0.7 per cent.

 

“It’s a completely closed market,” he says. “The two companies have created a national duopoly.”

 

The ruling will doubtless rest on a forest of technicalities. Eduardo Pérez Motta, who heads Cofeco, the antitrust authority, said that among other things, the plaintiffs have to prove that the companies carrying out the exclusive contracts were dominant in their market and that they were abusing that dominant position. They also have to prove that the contracts did not increase market efficiency in some way. “It’s not a straightforward thing,” he told the FT.

 

But even if Cofeco closes the case for lack of evidence, SABMiller and the microbreweries have at least two opportunities to appeal. And, if it comes to it, they are sure to use them. As Mr Valenzuela told the FT: “We’re taking this all the way.”

 

 

——

Ireland: Reilly supports minimum pricing for alcohol

 

Source: Irish Examiner

By Cormac O’Keeffe and Evelyn Ring

Thursday, March 21, 2013

 

Health Minister James Reilly says he “absolutely supports” the introduction of minimum pricing for alcohol.

 

His comments came as the Cabinet prepares to consider a long-awaited Government action plan on alcohol which is set to include proposals on minimum pricing, alcohol sponsorship and advertising.

 

Alex White, the junior health minister responsible for the alcohol strategy, publicly conceded yesterday there would be opposition to some of the measures, decisions on which would be made “shortly”.

 

Speaking at the National Alcohol Awareness Week conference, Mr White said the Government was “not going to wait” to see how alcohol measures in other countries fared and would take a lead. This was being interpreted as a possible reference to events in Britain last week where prime minister David Cameron did a U-turn on plans to introduce minimum pricing in England and Wales. Observers have speculated on whether it might affect the decision of the Cabinet here, where four ministers have already expressed opposition to, or concern with, key proposals.

 

There is also uncertainty as to what, if any, effect Downing St’s decision will have on plans by the North’s administration to introduce minimum pricing. The Government here has pushed for an all-island approach to minimum pricing, to avoid cross-border trade developing. It is also keeping an eye on events in Scotland which has passed legislation on minimum pricing but has not yet enforced it.

 

Speaking at a health conference, Mr Reilly said he “absolutely supports” minimum pricing for alcohol and said he had been in talks with his Northern counterpart Edwin Poots to introduce it simultaneously.

 

Mr Reilly said he wanted to see alcohol prices fall in pubs and for prices in off-licences and big supermarkets to go “way up”.

 

Mr White said he had heard arguments against “every single measure” being proposed. He said this included arguments that sports sponsorship doesn’t increase consumption – a claim made by Sports Minister Leo Varadkar.

 

Mr White told the conference, organised by Alcohol Forum, that the Government would announce “actual decisions” on pricing and sponsorship shortly.

 

He said governments across Europe were considering the same solutions.

 

“We won’t be deferring our decision, we’re not commissioning more research or see how other countries get along.”

 

The action plan is based on a Government expert group, which sat for three years before publishing its report a year ago.

 

The plan was initially supposed to go the Cabinet last summer and, again, last September. Since November, Mr White has stated it would be before the Cabinet in a matter of weeks.

 

The latest prediction is for next Tuesday.

 

 

——

North Carolina: Plan for 3-ounce alcohol drink falls flat

 

Source: WRAL

Mar 20th

 

State regulators on Wednesday rejected a brewer’s plans to sell 3-ounce vials of high-alcohol malt beverage in North Carolina, saying they feared it would entice teens to drink.

 

Stout Brewing wanted to sell its Stout 21 malt beverage in grocery and convenience stores in such flavors as Margarita, Screwdriver and Apple Pie. The company bills the product as a “Flavored Alcoholic Shooter.”

 

Mike Herring, administrator for the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission, noted that the 3-ounce can with the twist-off cap contains as much alcohol as a 12-ounce beer.

 

“In a matter of minutes, a person can gulp that container down and take one of these (four) packs and gulp it four times and have the equivalent of four, high-proof, 12-ounce beers,” Herring told the ABC board. “You can just keep drinking these and drinking these, and the next thing you know, it’s going to hit you, and you’re not going to realize how much alcohol you’ve had.”

 

Stout 21 would most likely appeal to underage drinkers, he said, because they could conceal the small container in a pocket or backpack. Also, the unusual packaging would make it harder for parents and law enforcement officers to recognize it as an alcoholic beverage, he said.

 

Mike Adams, an attorney for Stout Brewing, said the company wanted to make a safe and responsible product and designed the 3-ounce can to “stand out” so it could be marketed better to 21- to 35-year-olds.

 

There was never any intent to appeal to teens, Adams said, adding that the smaller beverage is for consumers who don’t want “to be filled up.”

 

“It allows the consumer to very appropriately regulate the quantity of alcohol they consume,” he said.

 

Adams complained that ABC regulations don’t spell out rules for the size and shape of containers, adding that Stout Brewing has already purchased the equipment to make the 3-ounce can at its Kings Mountain brewery.

 

The $2.1 million brewery opened last year and employs 32 people in an area with a 10.6 percent unemployment rate.

 

Commissioners weren’t swayed, however, voting unanimously against Stout 21.

 

“This vial you’re trying to approve is less than half the size of anything we’ve ever approved with that content of alcohol,” Commissioner Joel Keith said.

 

ABC Chairman Jim Gardner, a former lieutenant governor, said he worries about his three young granddaughters.

 

“I’m very much concerned about the underage drinking problems in our state,” Gardner said. “We’re going to do everything we can possibly can – in the area of underage drinking, to do what we possibly can – to turn the tide somehow.”

 

Stout Brewing owner Cody Sommer was disappointed with the decision and said his management team would have to reassess the situation.

 

“We still feel correct that our product is not marketed to underage drinkers, and we still feel that way and that’s how we’re going to move forward,” Sommer said.

 

 

——

In a New Aisle, Energy Drinks Sidestep Some Rules

 

Source: New York Times

By BARRY MEIER

Mar 19th

 

Fans of Monster Energy, the popular high-caffeine energy drink, may not notice the change: its ingredients will be the same and its familiar label bearing a green, clawlike monogram will change only slightly. But the drink’s maker has decided after a decade of selling it as a dietary supplement to market it as a beverage, a switch that will bring significant changes in how it is regulated.

 

Among them: Monster Beverage, the nation’s biggest seller of energy drinks, will no longer be required to tell federal regulators about reports potentially linking its products to deaths and injuries.

 

The company’s recent move, which follows a similar regulatory makeover by another brand, Rockstar Energy, comes amid intensifying scrutiny of energy drink safety. On Tuesday, a group of 18 doctors and researchers sent a letter to the Food and Drug Administration urging it to take action to protect adolescents and children from the possible risks of high caffeine consumption. “There is evidence in the published scientific literature that the caffeine levels in energy drinks pose serious potential health risks,” the researchers wrote.

 

Monster Beverage’s new cans will also disclose caffeine content for the first time. A 16-ounce can of Monster’s most popular energy drinks will contain 140 to 160 milligrams of caffeine, compared with about 330 milligrams in a 16-ounce cup of Starbucks coffee.

 

The company is fighting back against critics on several fronts. This month, it held a news conference to dispute accusations in a lawsuit that the death of a 14-year-old girl was linked to high caffeine levels in Monster Energy. Separately, it threatened to sue a nutritionist who publishes a newsletter for elementary schools for statements that it said were defamatory.

 

The changes by Monster and Rockstar demonstrate the degree to which energy drink manufacturers can decide which rules to follow.

 

“We don’t have energy drinks defined by any regulation,” Daniel Fabricant, director of the F.D.A.’s dietary supplement division, acknowledged in an interview in October.

 

For a decade, Monster sold its products as dietary supplements, apparently as part of a strategy to convince consumers that they were different from beverages. But the company, like its competitors, has run into a spate of bad news, including the disclosure in October that the F.D.A. had received reports in recent years that mentioned its drinks in connection with deaths and injuries.

 

Since then, the F.D.A. has received three more death reports and 14 injury reports that cite Monster energy drinks, an F.D.A. spokeswoman, Tamara Ward, said in an e-mail. In recent months, the agency has also received added reports about other energy products; since October, for example, it has received 38 reports that cite the popular energy “shot” 5-Hour Energy, including five involving a death.

 

The mention of a product in an incident report filed with the F.D.A. does not mean the product played a role in a death or injury, and such reports may provide few details. Monster Beverage and the maker of 5-Hour Energy have insisted that their products are safe and unrelated to the reported episodes.

 

A spokesman for Monster, Michael Sitrick, said the company had decided to market its products as beverages for several reasons. One was to stop what he described as “misguided criticism” that the company was selling its energy drinks as dietary supplements because of the belief that such products were more lightly regulated than beverages. Another consideration, he said, was that consumers can use government-subsidized food stamps to buy beverages.

 

“Monster Energy drinks could equally satisfy the regulatory requirements” for either category, Mr. Sitrick said.

 

An executive vice president at Rockstar, Joseph Cannata, said the company had made the change because consumers found food labels easier to read. In January, all production of Rockstar energy drinks switched to those labels, he said.

 

Rockstar had previously disclosed its caffeine content.

 

A lawyer who represents supplement makers, Justin J. Prochnow, said companies like Monster and Rockstar might have had another incentive. Over the last two years, the F.D.A. has intensified its scrutiny of the supplement industry’s manufacturing practices, driving up production costs.

 

As beverage producers, Monster and Rockstar will face some reporting mandates, including some that are stiffer than the mandates for supplement makers. Such companies are required to notify the government when they think a product could cause injury, a rule intended mainly to limit the distribution of tainted food. In addition, they are required to maintain scientific data supporting the safety of any ingredients they use that are not already cleared by the government. They can also voluntarily notify the F.D.A. about adverse events possibly affecting individual consumers, a step Monster Beverage said it planned to take.

 

Mr. Sitrick said Monster’s move to list caffeine content followed its decision to join the American Beverage Association, an industry trade group, which urges member companies to make such disclosures. He estimated that half of the company’s products would list caffeine content by April, and 90 percent by May.

 

In a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Monster Beverage, which is based in Corona, Calif., said that negative media reports about energy drinks had created “softness” in demand. Its stock, which traded for $83.96 last spring, closed at $49.72 on Tuesday, a decrease of more than 40 percent. Rockstar is privately held.

 

The energy drink industry also faces several investigations from federal and state officials into claims that its products provide benefits lacking in other caffeine sources, like coffee. Researchers say there is little evidence to support these claims.

 

At a recent news conference, Monster Beverage denied accusations that it was responsible for the 2011 death of a Maryland teenager who had consumed two 24-ounce cans of Monster Energy. The company said that tests were never conducted on the 14-year-old, Anais Fournier, to determine caffeine levels in her blood.

 

A lawyer representing her family, Kevin Goldberg, said a state medical examiner had found that the teenager, who had an underlying heart condition, died of a cardiac arrhythmia caused by caffeine toxicity. A spokesman for the chief medical examiner’s office in Baltimore declined to comment, citing continuing litigation.

 

Monster Beverage also claimed recently that the March issue of a newsletter sent to elementary school students and their parents contained defamatory statements that had “materially damaged Monster and its well-known brand.” It objected to several statements in the newsletter, Build Healthy Kids, including one that said children had died from energy drinks and should “never drink” them.

 

In a letter dated March 4, the company demanded that Deborah Kennedy, a nutritionist who publishes the newsletter, retract and correct the statements within five days or face a lawsuit.

 

Ms. Kennedy, who lives in Connecticut, said in an interview that she was stunned by the threat, in part because the newsletter never mentioned Monster Energy or any other product by name, but focused instead on the need for children to cut down on sugar-laden beverages.

 

In response, she called on one of Connecticut’s United States senators, Richard Blumenthal, who is a critic of the energy drink industry. Mr. Blumenthal’s office contacted Monster, which agreed to withhold legal action pending a meeting with Ms. Kennedy.

 

Ms. Kennedy, who holds a doctorate in nutrition, said she thought the audience for her newsletter, children from kindergarten through fifth grade, should not consume energy drinks. “They are going after me for reaching that segment, and it boggles my mind,” she said.

 

Mr. Sitrick, the Monster spokesman, said that the 7-year-old son of a Monster employee had received the newsletter at his school and was upset by it. The boy showed it to his father, who brought it to the attention of a company lawyer.

 

“No child, much less a 7-year-old, should be falsely informed that his or her father’s employer is a child killer, especially since there are no facts to support the allegation,” Mr. Sitrick said. He added that Ms. Kennedy had yet to meet with a lawyer for Monster.

 

Last week, Senator Blumenthal and two other Democratic lawmakers, Senator Richard J. Durbin of Illinois and Representative Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts, sent a letter to Monster Beverage urging it to apologize for the tone of its letter to Ms. Kennedy and asking whether the company had threatened others with lawsuits.

 

Mr. Sitrick said the company was still reviewing the letter but continued to believe that Ms. Kennedy’s statements were defamatory.

 

 

——

Diageo sues Missouri distributor Major Brands for ‘unacceptable’ performance (Additional Coverage)

 

Source: Beverage Daily

By Ben Bouckley

20-Mar-2013

 

Diageo is suing its principal Missouri wines and spirits distributor Major Brands, alleging ‘unacceptable’ performance, but Major CEO Susan McCollum insists her firm has a long record of ‘outstanding performance’ with the drink’s giant’s brands.

 

Speaking to BeverageDaily.com this afternoon, Major Brands CEO, Susan McCollum, said the firm did not want to comment on the litigation, but said her firm had been “blindsided by the lawsuit, especially given our multigeneration long relationship with Diageo”.

 

“We’ve been carrying the Diageo brands for generations, and we have an equally long record of outstanding performance as their distributor in Missouri. Even after the termination, Diageo has said that Major Brands remains the most respected distributor in the state of Missouri,” she said.

 

In a March 6 complaint filed in the US District Court District of Connecticut, Diageo Americas said it had given Major Brands notice that it planned to end their distribution agreement as of June 30.

 

Diageo said it expected Major Brands to challenge the validity of the termination, as the latter did earlier this year with Pernod Ricard USA, with Major claiming this would violate the Missouri Franchise Act because “suppliers can terminate liquor distribution agreements only with good cause”.

 

Pernod Ricard argues in a January 17 complaint filed in Missouri that it can exit distribution deals with both Major and rival Glazer’s, since neither involved a franchise agreement under the above act.

 

Diageo claims the same thing in relation to its contracts with Major, and seeks a court declaration that it (1) has contractual right to terminate the agreement on June 30, and (2) to ensure Major Brands did not retain rights to

distribute or selling Diageo drinks thereafter.

 

Thirdly, in its complaint signed by law firms Day Pitney and McDermott Will & Emery, Diageo also seeks a declaration that Major breached distribution contracts, and desires further damages upon this basis.

 

“The quality of Major Brand’s performance on behalf of Diageo, and the business relationship between Diageo and Major Brands, are unacceptable,” Diageo says in its complaint.

 

“Major brands profits substantially from selling Diageo’s products, but fails to devote even close to equivalent resources to the promotion and sale of Diageo’s products.

 

“Far from acting in a collaborative way consistent with a community of interest, Major Brands acts solely in its own interest,” the drink’s giant adds.

 

Diageo said that Major Brands distributed around 86% of its Missouri spirits and wine portfolio in by nine-liter case volumes, with Glazer’s Midwest picking-up the balance.

 

The UK-headquartered firm’s spirits and wines represented around 32% of Major Brands’ portfolio in these categories, the court said, but (with beer and non-alcoholic drinks included) under 25% of Major’s total business.

As of July 1 2013 – when Diageo gives up the right to supply Jose Cuervo tequilas, cocktails – these numbers will fall to 27% and 21% respectively.

 

‘Regularly acts adversely to Diageo’s interests’, suit claims.

 

But Diageo claims that Major Brands spends “substantially less” than 25% of employee time, advertising funds and promotion dollars on Diageo products, even using Diageo-derived resources to subsidize its costs and promote products from rival suppliers.

 

Diageo also alleges that Major “regularly ignores or rejects” suggestions on how to best sell Diageo products: Captain Morgan rum, Smirnoff Vodka, Seagram’s 7 whiskey.

 

Major has no incentive to improve performance, Diageo claims, since it also sells rival drinks such as Absolut Vodka (Pernod Ricard) Sailor Jerry Rum (William Grant & Sons) and Jim Beam Whiskey (Beam Inc.)

 

Since Major Brands wanted customers to purchase products of all of its suppliers, the firm did not have predominantly common interests with Diageo, the latter claims.

 

“To the contrary, Major Brands regularly acts adversely to Diageo’s interests,” the firm said, adding that it Major even refused a request made on fairness grounds to better resource Diageo’s portfolio.

 

Major Brands is Missouri’s highest volume alcohol distributor; acting as a distributor for hundreds of producers and suppliers of brands it carries 5000+ products and employs 700+ staff.

 

 

——

Scotch Whisky Association raises concerns over Dewar’s Highlander Honey (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just Drinks

By Olly Wehring

20 March 2013

 

The Scotch Whisky Association has admitted that it has “concerns” over Bacardi’s extension of its Dewar’s Scotch whisky brand in the US.

 

Following the announcement, the SWA said that the product did not breach any laws governing the definition of Scotch whisky. “It’s actually a ‘spirit drink’,” a spokesperson for the trade body told just-drinks. “The regulations only cover Scotch whisky, and it’s not being sold as Scotch whisky.

 

However, late yesterday, the SWA said: “We do have concerns that the labelling and promotion of Dewar’s Highlander Honey could distinguish the product more clearly from Scotch whisky. Under EU law, it has to be sold under the sales description ‘Spirit Drink’ and it would assist if that description was more conspicuous on the labelling to help make it clear it is not Scotch whisky.

http://www.just-drinks.com/news/scotch-whisky-association-raises-concerns-over-dewars-highlander-honey_id109859.aspx

 

 

——

Judge grants delay in Anheuser-Busch InBev, DOJ hearing until April 9

 

The Justice Department and A-B InBev have until April 9 to either settle or create a schedule for the court to hear the antitrust dispute.

 

Source: St. Louis BJ

Mar 20th

 

A judge has agreed to again extend the deadline to hear arguments between the U.S. Justice Department and Anheuser-Busch InBev over A-B’s planned $20.1 billion acquisition of Grupo Modelo, which could be a sign the sides are nearing an agreement.

 

U.S. District Court Judge Richard Roberts gave the Justice Department and A-B InBev until April 9 to either settle or create a schedule for the court to hear the antitrust dispute, Reuters reports. Last week, the brewers and Justice Department had requested an extension of a deadline that already had been extended until March 19, saying they had made “substantial progress” in talks.

 

A-B InBev struck a deal last June to buy the half of Grupo Modelo, brewer of Corona, that it didn’t already own for $20.1 billion. But the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit in January to block the merger, saying it “would substantially lessen competition in the market for beer in the United States.”

 

In requesting the additional extension, the companies said the progress in discussions with the Department of Justice were based on revisions to the merger that A-B InBev had announced in February to satisfy U.S government objections. Last month, A-B InBev agreed to sell Modelo’s Piedras Negras brewery, near the Texas border, to Constellation Brands and grant it perpetual rights for the Corona and Modelo brands distributed by Crown in the U.S. at a cost of $2.9 billion.

 

St. Louis-based Anheuser-Busch is part of Belgium-based Anheuser-Busch InBev. A-B InBev reported revenue of $39.8 billion in 2012, and Grupo Modelo is about a $7 billion company.

 

 

——

In Wine Market, a Bubble Still Bursting

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Mark Gimein  

March 20, 2013

 

In the current issue of Bloomberg Pursuits, Bloomberg wine writer Elin McCoy writes about Domaine de la Romanee-Conti, the ne plus ultra of fine Burgundy. The latest release of DRC’s flagship wine, the 2009 vintage, sells for $15,000 a bottle, older bottles for as much as $2,000 an ounce.

 

Still, as McCoy points out, DRC has been outperforming other wines at auction, largely because of the Burgundy craze among Chinese collectors. All of this raises a question that goes beyond DRC: Do the prices for top wines bespeak a bubble?

 

Take a look at the chart below, which shows the Liv-ex Fine Wine 100 Index of prices for 100 frequently traded high-end wines back to July, 2000. You’ll see that for five years it stayed flat, rising 265 percent through the middle of 2011 before slipping down. Over the last few months the wine market seems to have resumed its ascent.

 

The Liv-ex Fine Wine 100 Index peaked in 2011. There’s still room for it to go down further.

 

Does that mean that it’s now reached its natural level, or that the bubble is still filled with air? The hard thing about bubbles is that there’s no decisive answer to whether you’re in a bubble until after it’s over. In periods of high prices, there’s generally no shortage of folks ready to say that prices have just reached a permanent new plateau. So it is with wine. The growth of the global ultra-rich is one reason prices could gave gone up.

 

That said, I’m skeptical that the number of folks actually drinking wine at $1,000 a sip has exploded. Yes, there’s a new Chinese market, but it seems to be driven largely by people who are more interested in the investment value of their cellar than the liquid in their glass. McCoy has covered that vividly. At the end of 2011, she wrote about Chinese banks funding wine purchases. Let’s assume that the impulse to open a nice wine with dinner dissipates when you’ve financed your cellar with borrowed money.

 

Wine prices are now already about 20 percent below their peak. It’s tempting to assume that now that having leveled off they’re set to rise again. Don’t count on it. Rarely is the first sharp descent the true end of a bubble. On this subject, it’s hard to beat the conclusion of McCoy’s 2011 story, so I won’t even try. She wrote then, “My nickname for the Chinese wine investment market? Duchang. It means ‘casino.'” That was right near the very top of the market. There’s still plenty of room to keep falling.

 

 

——

Wine Advocate sues ex-critic Antonio Galloni for missing tasting notes

 

Source: LA Times

By S. Irene Virbila

March 20, 2013

 

The breakup of the Wine Advocate’s Robert B. Parker with his former lead wine critic Antonio Galloni is getting ugly. You might remember that Parker sold a substantial interest in his influential wine newsletter, the most powerful in the country, to Singapore investors last December. Though Parker isn’t exactly retiring, he is stepping down as editor-in-chief. And that position has been claimed not by Galloni, his heir apparent, but by Lisa Perrotti-Brown, a Master of Wine who was a Singapore-based correspondent for the publication.

 

Fast forward to Feb. 12: Galloni leaves to found his own website. End of story, or so it seemed.

 

But now the Wine Advocate is suing Galloni for breach of contract-and fraud. According to a story up at “the Wine Cellar Insider” by founder Jeff Leve, “the problem is that prior to the sale of The Wine Advocate, Antonio Galloni, who was being paid $300,000 and expenses per year, contracted to write about and review the wines of Sonoma, California and other regions for Robert Parker and The Wine Advocate. Galloni refused to deliver the work product once he ended his business relationship with the company. He claimed that he was unable to finish his report on time as it would not do justice to the region.” Read more of Galloni’s side of the issue at his site.

 

First thought: $300,000 is an astonishingly high salary, especially since  I remember seeing a tweet sent by someone at The Symposium for Professional Wine Writers at Meadowood Napa Valley in February. Only three of the wine writers in the room earned more than $25,000 per year from their writing.

 

Galloni’s proposal for resolving the issue is to publish the Sonoma report when he finishes it early next month on www.antoniogalloni.com and to give readers of the Wine Advocate free access to it.

 

But that seems just a little disingenous, because, of course, doing so would drive Wine Advocate readers and members of the popular erobertparker site to Galloni’s competing site. And why would the Wine Advocate want to do that? Especially since the tasting expenses came out of its budget?

 

Each side has its points, but how will the judge rule?

 

The situation looks even more complicated if you read further.  Evidently, Parker let loose a blast from Bordeaux where he’s tasting the 2012 vintage, explaining to his readers that “we have taken appropriate action to retrieve the report Antonio was paid to produce. It’s a disservice to you and to the vintner associations and winemakers who put in massive efforts coordinating tastings for this report in hopes of getting a Wine Advocate review. At the time of these tastings, Antonio was a reviewer for The Wine Advocate, so it stands to reason the report he was paid to provide should be submitted. We regret having any delay and appreciate your patience as we sort through details via the proper channels.

 

“Our actions are simply a matter of retrieving a service we paid for on your behalf. This is not an attempt to stop Antonio from moving on; we continue to wish him our very best.”

 

For legal buffs, a copy of the lawsuit is posted on the Wine Cellar Insider.  http://www.thewinecellarinsider.com/2013/03/robert-parker-sues-antonio-galloni-for-fraud-breach-of-contract/

 

 

——

Wine business Laithwaite’s toasts 18% rise in US revenues

 

Latest accounts show company now the largest mail-order wine business in North America

 

Source: The Guardian

Juliette Garside

Wednesday 20 March 2013

 

Laithwaite’s, the world’s largest home delivery wine business, is celebrating an 18% rise in revenues from the United States.

 

Thanks to partnerships with the Wall Street Journal, the Zagat restaurant guide and its Virgin Wines brand, the family-run British business has now also become the largest mail-order wine business in North America.

 

Growth abroad has helped increase sales at its Direct Wines holding company by 2.5% to £353m, according to accounts published on Wednesday. With operations in Australia, Hong Kong, mainland Europe and Australia, 30% of income is now from international sales.

 

Investments in software and overseas expansion drained profits, which fell from £11.5m to £6.6m.

 

The founders and co-chairs, Tom and Barbara Laithwaite, began to pass the baton to the next generation by appointing their three sons, Henry, Will and Tom, as directors last summer. The family will share in a £1.37m dividend.

 

The business expanded its winemaking capacity during the year, buying two chateaux in the Bordeaux village of Sainte-Colombe, where the Laithwaites bought their first estate in 1980. The company also tends vines in Buckinghamshire, Berkshire and Windsor Great Park.

 

 

——

Wine Industry Tries to Fix Image in China

 

California Vintners, Led by Bay Area Players, Promote Their Better Offerings in Market Where Cheap Stuff Sells at High Prices

 

Source: WSJ

By BEN WORTHEN

Mar 20th

 

When Mark Bright attends wine events in China, he says, people often complain that California wine is overpriced and of poor quality.

 

The San Francisco-based winemaker and sommelier blames that reputation on vendors who have flooded China with cheap “plunk” wine that they sell at prices normally charged only for better vintages.

 

“It’s horrible for California,” says Mr. Bright, who laments that if this continues, “we’re never going to be able to build a business in China.”

 

California winemakers-in particular those in Bay Area counties like Napa and Sonoma-have spent decades establishing their wines as some of the best in the world. But in China, where drinking wine is a more recent phenomenon, these well-constructed wines compete with bulk wine from the state that is bottled, branded and sold at prices they could never command elsewhere.

 

California’s wine establishment, led by Bay Area vintners, brokers and trade representatives, is now trying to change the image of the state’s wine in China. Mr. Bright is working on a Mandarin-language book about California wines. The Wine Institute, a San Francisco-based advocacy group for California wines, in July 2011 started holding virtual tastings via video conference for Chinese journalists. And earlier this month, Gov. Jerry Brown announced plans to promote California wines on an upcoming trip to China.

 

There is a lot riding on the efforts. While China in 2012 accounted for just under $74 million of the $1.4 billion of U.S. wine exports-about 90% of which comes from California-that is up from $16 million in 2007 and $2.6 million in 2003, according to the Wine Institute.

 

“There’s an amazing opportunity with this emerging middle class [in China] that’s buying cars and watches and wine,” says Linsey Gallagher, international marketing director for the Wine Institute. She adds that about 90% of the calls she gets these days are about China.

 

Some California wine businesses say they have seen firsthand how poor wines from the state have wound up in China. “We’ve had people just show up with bags of cash and say give me the cheapest wine. It was that bad,” says Robert Dahl, chief executive of California Shiners, a Napa-based company that buys bulk wine and then blends it and bottles it for customers, who brand and sell it. The people, who are either from China or have business connections there, are often looking to make a quick buck, he says. He declined to name any of them.

 

Mr. Dahl started his company two years ago and says he is on track to ship one million cases of wine this year, almost all of it to China. He says that he takes steps to ensure that his is a high-quality product, including having the proper facilities to store and filter the wine.

 

“People were just sending junk,” he says. “We’ve been pushing 100% against that. It makes us all look bad.”

 

David Duckhorn, whose family once owned a Napa winery and who now lives in Shanghai, started a business importing wines to China in 2008 and has taken steps to distinguish the wine he sells from the lower-quality stuff. He says he only sells bottles that are branded the same as the ones a customer in the U.S. would get, from the same winemakers and sourced from the same vineyards.

 

Wine imported into China, like that brought to the U.S. from overseas, require a local-language label on the back. California winemakers would leave the back of their bottles blank or ship them with the Chinese-language labels already affixed. To demonstrate his wines are the real deal, Mr. Duckhorn now asks for winemakers he works with to ship bottles with an English-language label on the back and he sticks the Chinese import label over it.

 

“You can peel it off,” he says, which lets buyers confirm the authenticity of the product.

 

Mr. Duckhorn’s company, Via Pacifica U.S. Inc., will soon have eight offices in China, where his staff puts on tastings for Chinese buyers. He encourages them to check online the prices that the same bottles sell for in the U.S. so that they can tell whether it is overpriced.

 

A bottle of wine in China typically costs about two or three times what it would in the U.S. because of taxes, import fees and other costs.

[image]

 

Still, as a middleman Mr. Duckhorn can’t always stop overpricing. One of his customers once bought some Decoy wine, a less-expensive release from the Duckhorn Winery-formally owned by Mr. Duckhorn’s family-that retails in the U.S. for around $20 per bottle, and at a 10-times markup in China.

 

Ms. Gallagher of the Wine Institute says some of the current problems will go away as Chinese wine buyers become better educated. The institute has led trade missions to China with California winemakers to promote the wines and recently launched a Chinese-language website about California wines.

 

Ms. Gallagher says she has lately had some success marketing food-and-wine pairings, with California wines going well with spicy dishes and traditional Chinese food like barbecued meats. The Wine Institute has put on events with sommeliers and chefs to tout this in Beijing and Shanghai.

 

“Journalists [in China] now write about food-and-wine pairings and how good California wines are,” she says.

 

 

——

Kobrand to represent Masi Agricola wines in US

 

Source: DBR

21 March 2013

 

Kobrand, a New York-based family-owned company that imports and markets wine and spirits brands, has entered into a long term sales and marketing agreement with Masi Agricola of Italy to represent its Masi Tupungato wines, and Serego Alighieri and Bossi Fedrigotti estates in the US.

 

Located in Italy’s Veneto region, Masi Agricola is known for making wines using Appassimento winemaking method. The winery produces wines such as Amarone and Campofriorin.

 

Masi Agricola will be put under the wine division of Kobrand Wines and Spirits, and will be handled by Kobrand brand manager Marco Sorio.

 

Commenting on the new partnership, Masi Agricola president Sandro Boscaini said, “Our partnership combines Masi’s high quality wines and pristine vineyards with Kobrand’s professionalism and approach to market.”

 

Kobrand CEO Bob DeRoose said the company looks forward to working with the Boscaini family to continue the brands’ success in the US.

 

“Masi Agricola has had a strong presence in both the on- and off-premise segments of our industry since its introduction to the US in late 1960s,” DeRoose added.

 

 

——

Clos Fourtet family buys three more Saint Emilion estates

 

Source: Decanter

by Jane Anson in Bordeaux

Wednesday 20 March 2013

Mathieu Cuvelier, owner of Chateau Clos Fourtet, is to finalise in the next few weeks the purchase of three further Saint Emilion properties.

 

The properties are Chateau Clos St Martin (1.3 hectares), Les Grands Murailles (1.ha) and Cote de Baleau (14ha).

 

All three are owned by Sophie Fourcade, who was a practicing lawyer before joining the family wine business in 1998.

 

All three are Saint Emilion classified estates; the vines of Les Grands Murailles are next door to those of Clos Fourtet.

 

Fourcade is to continue as director of the properties after the purchase, as is the rest of the technical team, including Michel Rolland as consultant, Decanter.com understands. Stéphane Derenoncourt is consultant at Clos Fourtet.

 

‘We have been in discussions with Sophie since last December,’ Cuvelier told Decanter.com.

 

He said the vines of Les Grands Murailles would not be used to boost production of next-door Clos Fourtet – for now.

 

‘We are keeping all three brands, because all have strong identities, and for now will be trying to understand the terroir and see where we need to invest. Of course there is the possibility for changes in the future, but everything needs to be studied carefully.’

 

‘We were very keen for our properties to go to another family,’ said Fourcade, ‘and not to a faceless insurance company. We are extremely happy that it has gone to our neighbours, to a family that we have known for a long time. We know that the properties will be well treated.’

 

With the Clos Fourtet vines, the Cuvelier family will now have 40ha in St Emilion, and also own Chateau Poujeaux, with 68ha in Moulis en Médoc. The price of the purchase was not revealed, but it is likely to have been several million euros per hectare.

 

 

——

Wal-Mart Wine Selling Is Key to South Africa’s U.S. Push

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Veronica Navarro Espinosa

Mar 20, 2013

 

South Africa, the eighth-biggest wine producer, is seeking to regain a foothold in the U.S. market lost to imports from Australia to Argentina by promoting brands at Wal-Mart (WMT) Stores Inc. and Whole Foods Market Inc. (WFM)

 

“We used to have a quite substantial market presence in the U.S. and it went all the way down,” George Monyemangene, the consul general of South Africa in New York, said in an interview at Bloomberg’s headquarters. “Maybe we were not as responsive as we should have been to newcomers.”

 

Wal-Mart, the world’s largest retailer, started selling South African wines in August 2012 and now has bottles in 1,600 stores, according to Deisha Barnett, a spokeswoman in Bentonville, Arkansas. Whole Foods Market, the largest U.S. natural-foods grocer, is planning a South African wine promotion later this year, said Doug Bell, the company’s national wine and beer buyer.

 

South Africa’s share of the market for wines imported to the U.S. fell to 1.2 percent last year from a peak of “about 8 percent” in the 1990s, according to data from San Francisco- based Wine Institute and Monyemangene. Italian wines have about 29 percent of the import market, followed by France, Australia and Argentina. Imports of South African wine to the U.S. have risen fivefold since 2000, compared with a more than 12-fold jump for Argentina and New Zealand wine imports, according to the South African Consulate.

 

“South African wine has matured,” Bell said in a telephone interview from Blue Ridge, Georgia. “It’s time to showcase them. The quality is there. I don’t think they’re the little brother of the wine world anymore.”

 

Seven Sisters

 

In the U.S., Wal-Mart sells Seven Sisters wines, founded by seven sisters of South Africa’s Brutus family, Barnett said in a telephone interview. Wal-Mart entered Africa’s largest consumer market in 2011 with the acquisition of a majority stake in Johannesburg-based Massmart Holdings Ltd. (MSM)

 

The efforts to boost sales of South African wine in the U.S. are taking place as the rand trades at a four-year low against the U.S. dollar amid labor disputes in the mining industry, a widening budget shortfall and the threat of a downgrade of South Africa’s BBB credit rating, the second-lowest investment grade. The currency has slipped more than 8 percent this year, the most among 25 major emerging-market currencies compiled by Bloomberg.

 

White Wine

 

The weaker currency will boost South Africa’s total wine exports 5.1 percent this year to 430 million liters, a level 23 percent higher than two years earlier, according to a USDA Foreign Agricultural Service report dated March 14. White wine makes up 81 percent of the country’s exports to the U.S., according to the report.

 

South Africa wine production dates back to the 1600s, when the Dutch East India Company established a supply station in the Cape of Good Hope. Exports began booming after countries stopped boycotting South African products in protest over apartheid, the white minority government that ended in 1994.

 

Monyemangene, the consul general, said producers may have lost market share by underpricing “top-end” wine. With the new agreements with U.S. retailers, sales are starting to increase, he said.

 

“We have some intermediate to long-term agreements within the export market,” Monyemangene said in the March 13 interview. “We have seen a rise in terms of volume of wines.”

 

 

——

Ignite Restaurant 4th-Quarter Loss Widens on Restatement, Debt Costs

 

Source: WSJ

By Ben Fox Rubin

Mar 20th

 

Ignite Restaurant Group Inc.’s (IRG) fourth-quarter loss grew from a year ago as the restaurant operator was weighed down by a handful of one-time costs, though same-store sales continued to improve.

 

Ignite, which has about 130 Joe’s Crab Shack restaurants and 15 of its newer Brick House Tavern+Tap chain, launched its initial public offering in May with plans to expand in the dense U.S. market.

 

Connecticut private equity firm J.H. Whitney Capital Partners LLC bought 120 Joe’s locations from Landry’s Restaurants in 2006 in a $192 million deal. It then launched Brick House–a gastropub-styled brand–in 2008 and changed its name from Joe’s Crab Shack Holdings Inc. to Ignite. The company, whose market value is now about $414 million, last month agreed to buy Romano’s Macaroni Grill for $55 million, adding an Italian food chain to its portfolio.

 

While the company’s stock popped when it went public, shares tumbled in July after Ignite said it needed to correct and restate some financial records, after it uncovered non-cash accounting errors that had existed for years.

 

For the latest quarter, Ignite posted a loss of $7.6 million, or 30 cents a share, compared with a year-ago loss of $1 million, or five cents. The company had previously warned that it would post one-time charges in the latest quarter related to restatement costs and debt amortization write-offs. Excluding those costs and other items, the company reported a loss of 15 cents a share. Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters most recently expected a loss of 14 cents a share.

 

Revenue was up 11% at $112.6 million, mostly in-line with the company’s January estimate of $112.5 million. Total costs and expenses rose 13% to $118.6 million.

 

The company in January said same-store sales rose 0.8% during the quarter, excluding a 0.1% impact from Hurricane Sandy.

 

Shares closed Wednesday at $16.23 and were unchanged after hours. The stock is up 16% from its IPO price of $14.

 

 

——

California: Californians drinking less beer, more wine, spirits

 

Source: SacBee

By Phillip Reese

Mar. 19, 2013

 

California adults now drink, on average, less than a gallon of ethanol from beer each year. They’re making up for it by drinking more wine and distilled spirits.

 

California beer consumption per adult fell 12 percent from 1998 to 2010, according to the latest federal statistics.

 

Over that same period California wine consumption per adult grew by 22 percent, while distilled spirits consumption grew by 16 percent.

 

Beer remains the most popular alcoholic beverage, with California adults drinking an average of 0.97 gallons of ethanol from beer a year, compared to three-quarters of a gallon of spirits and half a gallon of wine. Beer is about 4.4% ethanol, so California adults drink, on average, about 22 gallons a year.

 

California alcohol consumption decreased slightly during the recession but has trended upward slightly overall in the last decade. Consumption remains well below levels from the 1980s and 1990s. (About 40 percent of California adults rarely or never drink alcohol.)

 

This chart shows average gallons of ethanol from alcohol consumed per California resident over the age of 14 each year since 1991.

 

http://www.sacbee.com/2013/03/19/5275952/californians-drinking-less-beer.html

 

 

——

Michigan: Michigan House votes to keep 0.08 pct. alcohol law

 

Source: Morning Sun

03/20/13

 

The Michigan House has passed legislation that would prevent a scheduled rise in the state’s blood-alcohol limit for drivers.

 

The bills approved unanimously Wednesday would keep the legal limit for drivers’ blood-alcohol content at 0.08 percent. The limit is set to revert back to 0.10 percent in October because of a sunset provision in current state law.

 

Republican Rep. Klint Kesto of Commerce Township in Oakland County is sponsoring one of the bills. He says the state would lose more than $50 million in federal funding if the limit rises to 0.10 percent.

 

He says since Michigan has implemented a 0.08 percent limit, there has been a significant drop in alcohol-related traffic fatalities.

 

The bills now head to the Senate.

 

 

——

U.S. to revise cigarette warning labels

 

Source: AP

Michael Felberbaum

March 19, 2013

 

The FDA will create labels to replace those that included images of diseased lungs and a corpse.

 

The U.S. government is abandoning a legal battle to require that cigarette packs carry a set of large and often macabre warning labels depicting the dangers of smoking and encouraging smokers to quit.

 

Instead, the Food and Drug Administration will go back to the drawing board and create labels to replace those that included images of diseased lungs and the sewn-up corpse of a smoker, according to a letter from Attorney General Eric Holder obtained by the Associated Press. The government had until Monday to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review an appeals court decision upholding a ruling that the requirement violated First Amendment free speech protections.

 

“In light of these circumstances, the Solicitor General has determined … not to seek Supreme Court review of the First Amendment issues at the present time,” Holder wrote in a Friday letter to House Speaker John Boehner notifying him of the decision.

 

Some of the nation’s largest tobacco companies, including R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., sued to block the mandate to include warnings on cigarette packs as part of the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act that, for the first time, gave the federal government authority to regulate tobacco. The nine labels originally set to appear on store shelves last year would’ve represented the biggest change in cigarette packs in the U.S. in 25 years.

 

Tobacco companies increasingly rely on their packaging to build brand loyalty and grab consumers – one of the few advertising levers left to them after the government curbed their presence in magazines, billboards and TV. They had argued that the proposed warnings went beyond factual information into anti-smoking advocacy.

 

The government, however, argued the images were factual in conveying the dangers of tobacco, which is responsible for about 443,000 deaths in the U.S. a year.

 

The nine graphic warnings proposed by the FDA included color images of a man exhaling cigarette smoke through a tracheotomy hole in his throat, and a plume of cigarette smoke enveloping an infant receiving a mother’s kiss. These were accompanied by assertions that smoking causes cancer and can harm fetuses. The warnings were to cover the entire top half of cigarette packs, front and back, and include the phone number for a stop-smoking hotline, 1-800-QUIT-NOW.

 

In a statement on Tuesday, the FDA said it would “undertake research to support a new rulemaking consistent with the Tobacco Control Act.” The FDA did not provide a timeline for the revised labels.

 

Warning labels first appeared on U.S. cigarette packs in 1965, and current warning labels that feature a small box with text were put on cigarette packs in the mid-1980s. Changes to more graphic warning labels that feature color images of the negative effects of tobacco use were mandated in a law passed in 2009 that, for the first time, gave the federal government authority to regulate tobacco.

 

The share of Americans who smoke has fallen dramatically since 1970, from nearly 40% to about 19%. But the rate has stalled since about 2004, with about 45 million adults in the U.S. smoking cigarettes. It’s unclear why it hasn’t budged, but some market watchers have cited tobacco company discount coupons on cigarettes and lack of funding for programs to discourage smoking or to help smokers quit.

 

In recent years, more than 40 countries or jurisdictions have introduced labels similar to those created by the FDA. The World Health Organization said in a survey done in countries with graphic labels that a majority of smokers noticed the warnings and more than 25 percent said the warnings led them to consider quitting.

 

Joining North Carolina-based R.J. Reynolds, owned by Reynolds American Inc., and Lorillard Tobacco, owned by Lorillard Inc., in the lawsuit are Commonwealth Brands Inc., Liggett Group LLC and Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company Inc.

 

Richmond, Va.-based Altria Group Inc., parent company of the nation’s largest cigarette maker, Philip Morris USA, which makes the top-selling Marlboro brand, is not a part of the lawsuit.

 

The case is separate from a lawsuit by several of the same tobacco companies over other marketing restrictions in the 2009 law. Last March, a federal appeals court in Cincinnati ruled that the law was constitutional. The companies in October petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review that case.

Liquor Industry News 3-19-13

March 19, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday March 19th

Today Is A Biodynamic FLOWER Day

Great To Taste Or Drink Wine!

US Spirits Nielsen Data Sales growth remains solid in February

 

Source: UBS

Mar 18th  

 

US spirits Nielsen data shows sales up +5.1% in four weeks to 2 March

 

Lapping a challenging +3.7% comp, US spirits volumes (ex Washington) grew 2.1% y/y (above the +1.9% last 12 week trend y/y). Price/mix grew +3.0% y/y (in line with the last 12 week trend), implying +5.1% sales growth y/y (similar to 12 and 52 weeks y/y). The % of volume sold on promo is down -280bps y/y in the last month (-230bps last 12 weeks), led by Pernod (-530bps) and Diageo (-480bps).

 

US Spirits trend remains solid, but offers limited upside to our forecasts

 

US Spirits recovery remains solid, but we see limited scope for growth upgrades relative to our forecasts. Diageo and Pernod have stronger price/mix than the market, with both cutting back significantly on promotions. We estimate 2013 US spirits volume and value growth of 2.0% and 4.5% y/y.

 

 

——

Brewers Association: Craft Beer is Now a $10 Billion Category

 

Source: Brewbound

by Chris Furnari

March 18th

 

Craft beer is now a $10 billion category.

 

As part of its annual report on the state of the U.S. craft beer industry, the Brewers Association (BA) – a trade group representing small and independent brewers – indicated that U.S. craft beer volumes reached an all-time high last year.

 

With 2012 production swelling past 13.2 million barrels – a 15 percent increase from 2011 – craft sales grew by 17 percent, taking total retail revenues for the category up to an estimated $10.2 billion.

 

“Beer is a $99 billion industry to which craft brewers are making a significant contribution, with retail sales share hitting double-digits for the first time in 2012,” BA director Paul Gatza said in a press release.

 

Craft beer sales have been steadily increasing since 2005, when 1,394 breweries made just 6.3 million barrels. Fast forward eight years, and nearly 1,000 new breweries have opened their doors, helping to more than double the industry’s total production of craft beer. In the last two years alone, 684 new breweries have launched, while only 80 have shut their doors, according to the BA.

 

“On average, we are seeing slightly more than one craft brewery per day opening somewhere in the U.S. and we anticipate even more in the coming year,” Gatza said.

 

But the BA definition of “craft ” only includes those brewers who produce less than 6 million barrels annually and are less than 25 percent owned by another non-craft brewer. That means production from Craft Brew Alliance (which markets the Kona, Redhook and Widmer Brothers brands), Goose Island, Magic Hat and Pyramid goes unaccounted for. The BA definition also excludes production from the independently-owned D.G. Yuengling & Son, which produced over 2.5 million barrels in 2012, and so-called “crafty” brews like Shock Top (owned by Anheuser-Busch InBev) and Blue Moon (owned by MillerCoors). Collectively, more than 6 million barrels of what many believe is better quality beer than most domestic premium offerings is left unaccounted for.

 

Nonetheless, the new BA figures confirm craft’s upward surge across multiple retail channels, which Symphony IRI’s senior vice president of beverage alcohol services, Dan Wandel, reported during last month’s “Power Hour” seminar. The research company said craft dollar sales increased 18.5 percent in food, drug, club, dollar, military, multi-outlet and convenience channels.

 

Included below is the complete BA press release which further details the growth of craft beer in 2012.

 

Boulder, CO – The Brewers Association (BA), the trade association representing small and independent American brewers, today released 2012 data on U.S. craft brewing1 growth. In a year when the total U.S. beer market grew by one percent, craft brewers saw a 15 percent rise in volume2 and a 17 percent increase in dollar growth, representing a total barrel increase of almost 1.8 million.

 

With production at 13,235,917 barrels in 2012, craft brewers reached 6.5 percent volume of the total U.S. beer market, up from 5.7 percent the previous year. Additionally, craft dollar share of the total U.S. beer market reached 10.2 percent in 2012, as retail dollar value from craft brewers was estimated at $10.2 billion, up from $8.7 billion in 2011

 

“Beer is a $99 billion industry to which craft brewers are making a significant contribution, with retail sales share hitting double digits for the first time in 2012,” said Paul Gatza, director, Brewers Association. “Small and independent brewers are consistently innovating and producing high quality, flavor-forward craft brewed beer. Americans are not only responding to greater access to these products, but also to the stories and people behind them.”

 

In 2012, there was an 18 percent increase in the number of U.S. operating breweries, with the total count reaching 2,403. This count includes 409 new brewery openings and only 43 closings. Small breweries created an estimated 4,857 more jobs during the year, employing 108,440 workers, compared to 103,583 the year prior.

 

“On average, we are seeing slightly more than one craft brewery per day opening somewhere in the U.S. and we anticipate even more in the coming year. There is clearly a thirst in the marketplace for craft brewed beer, as indicated by the continued growth year after year,” added Gatza. “These small breweries are doing great things for their local communities, the greater community of craft brewers, our food arts culture and the overall economy.”

 

http://www.brewbound.com/news/2013/brewers-association-craft-beer-is-now-a-10-billion-category

 

 

——

Yucaipa Taps Into U.S. Craft Beers

 

Burkle’s Firm Invests in Startup That Will Spend Over $100 Million to Help Brewers Boost Capacity

 

Source: WSJ

By MIKE ESTERL

Mar 18th

 

Ron Burkle’s Yucaipa Cos. is the latest investment firm to tap the small but fast-growing craft beer industry, taking a majority stake in a startup company that plans to spend more than $100 million to build five new breweries.

 

Instead of brewing its own beer, Brew Hub LLC of St. Louis, Mo. hopes to fill each facility with at least half a dozen small brewers who want to expand production but face capacity constraints. The new venture will also offer brewers other fee-based services, including distributing and marketing support.

 

Roughly three of four beers sold in the U.S. are brewed by two multinational giants: Belgium’s Anheuser-Busch InBev NV, BUD +0.20% which makes Budweiser and Bud Light, and MillerCoors LLC, a joint venture between the U.K.’s SABMiller SAB.LN -1.21% PLC and Denver-based Molson Coors Brewing Co. TAP -0.95% which makes Coors Light and Miller Lite.

 

But most of the industry’s expansion is being fueled by hundreds of small and independent brewers, or so-called craft brewers, whose shipments have grown by a double-digit percentage three straight years as more Americans branch out from mainstream lagers.

 

Craft volumes surged 15% to 13.2 million barrels in 2012, compared with 1% growth for the U.S. beer industry as a whole, the Brewers Association estimated Monday. Retail sales of craft beer also topped $10 billion for the first time last year, or about one-tenth of U.S. beer sales, as the number of breweries climbed 18% to 2,403, according to the industry group.

 

Outside money increasingly is looking for a way in. Last year Fireman Capital Partners bought a majority stake in Utah Brewers Cooperative, maker of Squatters and Wasatch beers, while Sage Capital acquired a 60% stake in Saint Louis Brewery Inc., maker of Schlafly beer.

 

Equity deals still have been few and far between, though, because many craft brewers are reluctant to surrender control. Many are seeking bank loans to expand their own facilities, renting space from so-called contract brewers or joining with other small brewers to keep up with demand. Up to five million barrels in new brewing capacity are in planning stages across the country.

 

“We’re helping them scale but allowing them to stay in control of their destiny,” said Frank Quintero, a principal at Las Vegas-based Yucaipa.

 

California-born Ron Burkle’s investment arm has completed more than $30 billion in mergers and acquisitions since 1986. Yucaipa’s holdings include stakes in A&P supermarkets, cold-storage company Americold, movie studio Relativity Media and Morgans Hotel Group MHGC +10.74% .

 

Brew Hub plans to break ground by May on a 75,000-barrel brewery in Lakeland, Fla., a state where brewing capacity is particularly tight. Over the next five years, it plans to build at least four other breweries in other parts of the country, including Texas and a mid-Atlantic state. Tim Schoen, a former Anheuser-Busch executive, will run the company.

 

Jim Gorczyca, owner of O’Fallon Brewery in the St. Louis area, says he’s weighing whether to build a new brewery or partner with a company such as Brew Hub after shipments at his brewery soared 21% last year to 10,500 barrels. He’d also like to expand into more states.

 

“Brew Hub becomes a solution outside your home market,” said Mr. Gorczyca, whose brewery’s top-selling beers include O’Fallon 5-Day IPA and O’Fallon Wheach, a peach-flavored wheat beer.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: Pa. House liquor committee approves sale of state store system

 

Gov. Corbett’s bill is amended, but measure moves to full House for vote Thursday.

 

Source: The Morning Call

By Steve Esack

March 18, 2013

 

David Moyer has a plan to help his family.

 

“He said, ‘Mom, I’m going to get a job,’ ” Billie Moyer said.

 

He’s 6.

 

In his Clark, Mercer County, home, that’s old enough to understand the anguish his parents have faced over whether Billie will lose her hourly $21.48 salary and family health benefits as an assistant manager of a state liquor store if the Legislature agrees to privatize the sale of wine and spirits stores as Gov. Tom Corbett wants.

 

His mom is now one step closer to losing her job.

 

After a four-hour hearing Monday, the House Liquor Control Committee voted 14-10 along party lines to end the state’s 80-year-old monopoly on the sale of booze as the Republican governor proposed as part of his $28.4 billion spending plan for 2013-14. The full House is scheduled to vote on the bill Thursday, and, if approved, the bill would move to the Senate for consideration before going to Corbett.

 

The bill the committee adopted is not as grand as Corbett had wanted and its projected proceeds of a sale would be $200 million lower than the governor’s $1 billion estimate. Corbett would spend the money on public education.

 

Despite those differences, Corbett said he was pleased with the bill and sale proceeds would still go to public schools.

 

“We believe this bill will allow us to make a significant investment in schools and it also increases penalties and fines, both of which are important parts of my plan,” Corbett said in a statement.

 

After the hearing, Rep. Paul Costa, D-Allegheny, the committee’s minority chairman, said the committee vote was a foregone conclusion. House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, a longtime privatization proponent, stacked the committee with like-minded Republicans to win the measure, he said.

 

“If he couldn’t get this out of committee, that would have been a huge embarrassment,” Costa said.

 

John Taylor, R-Philadelphia, chairman of the House Liquor Control Committee, said he expects the committee’s bill to be amended, but he predicted the governor will have a bill to sign later this year.

 

Corbett’s original plan was outlined in House Bill 790, which Turzai, R-Allegheny, began advertising in January. Under that plan the state’s 600 state stores would have been phased out over four years in place of 1,200 wine and liquor retailers.

 

Some of those retailers would have included beer distributors who would have had to pay upward of $150,000 to sell wine and also six-packs. At the same time, the bill also would have expanded beer and wine sales into supermarkets, convenience stores and retailers such as Target, Walmart and Costco.

 

But that plan had no chance.

 

For weeks, Taylor said he had his own plan to scale back privatization in large part to protect 1,138 beer distributors who feared they could not compete against big-box stores like Walmart.

 

On Friday, Taylor did just that with an amended bill, 375, introduced by Rep. Mark Mustio, R-Allegheny. On Monday, the committee approved the amended bill.

 

It calls for beer distributors to get first dibs on licenses to sell wine, liquor or both for between $7,500 and $60,000. Beer distributors would be able to pay the licensing fees in monthly installments over two years.

 

In theory, that would leave 62 retail licenses, ranging from $97,500 to $262,500, that would go to the independent stores or corporate chains like Walmart.

 

Large chains like Walmart, however, could only sell liquor or wine at five locations in the state.

 

The bill would allow 820 grocery stores – or one per every 15,000 residents per county – to sell beer and wine. In addition, the prohibition against gas stations selling beer would be voided. Restaurants would be permitted to sell up to six bottles of wine or up to 24 beers to go, and taverns could sell liquor by the bottle.

 

More private licenses could be issued at a future date while state stores gradually would be shuttered until there were 100 left and the entire system would be shut down.

 

The state employees who would lose their jobs would get between $1,000 and $2,000 education grants, which is double what Corbett had proposed. The amended bill also gives preferential treatment for other state jobs that do not require a civil service exam and employers who hire displaced state workers would get a $2,000 tax credit.

 

While Republicans were united behind the amended proposal, Democrats were united against it and got the committee to postpone a vote three times.

 

Rep. Tina Davis, D-Bucks, said the committee needs more time to review the amended bill before voting.

 

“It’s getting shoved down our throats in three days,” she said.

 

“It’s been 80 years,” Taylor replied.

 

The vote won praise from conservative groups, such as the Commonwealth Foundation, which said it is a way to increase jobs and bring change.

 

After the hearing, Wendell Young IV, president of the union that represents more than 4,000 state liquor store employees, said his members will fight to try to defeat the bill in the House and Senate.

 

Jay Wiederhold, president of the Pennsylvania Beer Alliance, said the amended proposal is a little better than Corbett’s plan, but it is far from acceptable. It is unnecessarily complex and creates too much competition with grocery stores, he said.

 

Moyer, the western Pennsylvania assistant state store manager, left Harrisburg confused and unsure of her future.

 

“I really don’t think any of them made any sense,” she said. “I don’t know what I’m going to do.”

 

 

——

New 3-ounce alcohol drink sparks concerns

 

Source: NC Capitol

By Mark Binker

March 18th

 

A company hoping to sell 3-ounce vials of high-alcohol malt beverages in flavors like Screw Driver and Apple Pie is asking the state Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission to approve its packaging.

 

Staff members with the ABC Commission rejected Stout Brewing’s packaging for its Stout 21 malt beverage product last month.The formal letter from the commission said the rejection was based on the state’s authority to “prohibit or regulate any advertising of alcoholic beverages which is contrary to the public interest.”  This doesn’t reject the drink itself, but rather the way in which it would be sold.

 

Advocates outside the ABC Commission say there is a particular concern that the product would lure underage drinkers.

 

Cody Sommer, chief executive of Stout Brewing, did not immediately return phone calls seeking comment. His company is asking the appointed three-member ABC Commission to overturn their staff’s ruling. The group will meet at 10 a.m. Wednesday.

 

The Stout 21 case is the first policy decision to be taken by Gov. Pat McCrory’s appointees to the ABC Commission, including former Republican Lt. Gov. Jim Gardner.

 

A malt beverage is any product that is brewed in a process similar to beer. While beers use grains like malted barley as their base and spices like hops to provide flavor, some cheaper malt beverages use the equivalent of sugar water to feed the yeast to produce alcohol as part of the brewing process. Flavors are then added much like they might be to a soda drink.

 

Such beverages are already commonplace in grocery and convenience stores, such as Bacardi Silver, which is sold in beer-like bottles and has 5 percent alcohol by volume.

 

Applications filed with the ABC Commission show that the Stout 21 beverages would be 15 percent alcohol by volume, the equivalent of 30 proof alcohol.

 

“It would be the same as any other malt beverage,” Larry Dooley, vice president of Fox Distributing in Shelby, one of two distributors listed by Stout 21.

 

Dooley said that, while some bars might choose to sell the Stout 21 product, he anticipated that most sales would be through convenience stores.

 

Stout Brewing describes the Stout 21 products as a “Flavored Alcoholic Shooter.” The packaging features a twist off top and a rounded bottom. Flavors, according to the company’s website, include Royal Flush, Margarita, Screwdriver, Apple Pie and J-Cola. They would be sold in single servings and four-packs.

 

Stout Brewing announced plans to open a brewery in Kings Mountain last year. Coverage of the announcement included notes that the company received economic development incentives from the county.

 

It’s unclear whether the company has started brewing beer. It has a separate website for its Stout 21 product.

 

The proposed product has raised concerns among advocates who argue for tighter controls on alcohol and work against underage drinking.

 

“It is the packaging that is of concern,” said Wanda Boone, of Durham TRY, a nonprofit that works to curb substance abuse among teenagers.

 

In her mind, she said, the packaging and flavors are “targeted toward underage consumers, which is really what the issue is.”

 

The Rev. Mark Creech, executive director of the Christian Action League, said this is a downside of the a 2005 law that lifted the cap on the amount of alcohol allowed in malt beverage, which had previously been set at 6 percent alcohol by volume. The law, he said, not only cleared the way for boutique beers and craft brewers.

 

“We’re putting something on the convenience store shelves that’s akin to the same alcohol beverage content you can find at the ABC liquor stores,” Creech said. “That cannot be safe.”

 

Although there are some liquors in the 30 proof range sold in ABC stores, most are 70 proof or above, according to a commission product listing.

 

 

——

Trade body hits out after absinthe plans rejected (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just-Drinks

By James Wilmore

18 March 2013

 

Trade group spiritsEUROPE has voiced its disppointment after a bid by the European Commission to define and standardise absinthe was rejected.  

 

The bid was blocked in a vote by the European Parliament in Strasbourg last Wednesday (13 March). The EC had proposed that any product labelled absinthe must contain set minimum levels of anethole and thujone.

 

The Commission is concerned that some manufacturers are not including these ingredients, or enough of them, and yet still selling their products as ‘absinthe’.

 

 

——

St. Paddy’s Weekend shows healthy growth from last year

 

Source: GuestMetrics

March 18, 2013

 

According to GuestMetrics, based on its database of POS sales, food & beverage sales over the St. Patrick’s 3-day Weekend posted solid sales growth of +2.5% compared to the prior year benefitting from the holiday falling on a Sunday this year vs. Saturday year ago.

 

“Comparing the rolled up period of Friday, Saturday and Sunday this year against the same period from last year, St. Patrick’s Weekend posted healthy sales growth of 2.5%, the net result of traffic being about 1% below last year’s level but pricing up 4%.  So even though traffic was a little soft, the strong pricing more than made up for that, which should be a positive for the operators,” said Bill Pecoriello, CEO of GuestMetrics LLC.  “In terms of the specific segments within on-premise, bars benefitted more from the holiday falling on Sunday with 3-day sales up 6%, the net result of traffic up 2% and pricing up 4%, while restaurants’ performance was a bit weaker, with sales up 2%, traffic down 2%, and pricing also up 4%.  On the whole, given the general weakness in on-premise during the final quarter of 2012 and the beginning of 2013, the weekend turned out to show healthier results. Looking specifically at the alcoholic beverage category for the St. Patrick’s Weekend this year versus the prior year, sales of total alcoholic beverages were up 3.2% while the number of total alcoholic drinks ordered was down 0.8%.”

 

“Digging deeper the dollar sales growth was largely driven by the spirits and wine categories, which both posted sales growth at around 6%, while food and cocktails sales grew about 2%, and beer and non-alcoholic beverage dollar sales were both flattish compared to the prior year,” said Peter Reidhead, VP of Strategy and Insights at GuestMetrics.  “In terms of the actual number of drinks ordered, which is the more relevant metric for the alcohol suppliers, wine was up 6%, spirits was up 2%, cocktails were down 2%, and beer was down 4%, so while we usually think of St. Patrick’s Day as a heavy beer occasion, consumer preferences appear to have shifted to spirits and wine this year.”

 

“In terms of comparing the actual date of March 17th from last year, which fell on a Saturday, against St. Patrick’s Day this year, which fell on a Sunday, Food and Beverage sales this year are about 33% below last year, which is why we believe it is more meaningful to compare the rolled up weekends against each other,” said Brian Barrett, President of GuestMetrics.  “In terms of the specific days we analyzed, Friday Alcohol Beverage sales this year were up 2.5%, Saturday Alcohol Beverage sales were down 4.9%, and Sunday Alcohol Beverage sales were up 24% driving the 3-day period up 3.2%.”  

 

 

——

C&C GROUP PLC (=) to (+): How much good can Woodchuck chuck?  

 

Source: Exane BNP

Mar 18th

 

TP raised by 39% to EUR5.7 . Upside: 18%

Beverages (-) . Ireland . Price (14 Mar. 13): EUR4.83

 

C&C is becoming a US cider play just as the US market is lighting up…

Once the preferred drink of Americans, cider was until recently on the verge of extinction in the US. But over the last couple of years, its long-predicted return has at last materialized and volume growth is now rocketing. With cider possibly replicating the success of craft beer, we expect a 58% volume CAGR in the next five years for the US cider market. C&C’s integration of Vermont Hard Cider means it now controls almost half of the US cider market with production facilities on both the East and West Coasts. Within the next two years, the USA should generate two thirds of C&C’s organic growth, which will rise from -5% in the year to Feb.13e to +8% in FY15e. Instrumental to this will be the expansion of Woodchuck, a brand whose penetration among retailers could quickly increase by as much as 60% through geographic expansion and its integration with Hornsby’s.

 

…but is still seen as an Irish consumer stock

The 0.85 correlation coefficient between C&C’s P/E and Irish consumer confidence suggests the stock is still seen through the prism of Ireland. Whilst we are cautious on cider volumes both in that country and in the UK, we stress that the acquisition of Irish beverage distributor Gleeson’s provides a formidable platform from which Tennent’s – C&C’s main beer brand – can triple its distribution reach, bringing Ireland back to organic growth as early as this fiscal year.

 

US opportunity not yet discounted, 18% upside even without further re-rating. Outperform

C&C lagged the sector by 7% over the last month, after some worried that the 30% rise in the shares over the last year already discounts the US opportunity. However, this rerating has been in line with the sector, with C&C still at a 19% discount to brewers on consensus P/E (14.8x). Our EUR5.7 TP is based on a 15x cal. 14e P/E multiple, which given the 20% EPS CAGR 12-14e seems reasonable relative to the sector and compared to the average 13x multiple since 2006, a period without EPS growth. Our higher expectations for the US put us 6% above FY14e consensus EPS (11% for FY15e). Convinced that our 36% revenue CAGR 13-16e in the US can be achieved without major investments other than the new plant in Vermont, and with 760bp margin expansion despite A&P, transport and raw materials inflation, we rate the stock Outperform.

 

 

——

China: Liquor shares slump on Li’s austerity promise, Moutai down by 4.25%

 

Source: Peoples Daily

By Fang Yunyu

March 19, 2013

 

Chinese high-end liquor producers saw their shares slump Monday after newly elected premier Li Keqiang vowed Sunday to put the government on a tight budget “to win the trust of the people.”

 

High-end liquor maker Kweichow Moutai Co dived by 4.25 percent to hit its one-year low at 169.45 yuan ($27) a share Monday, while the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index closed down by 1.68 percent.

 

Wuliangye Yibin Co, another top Chinese liquor firm, saw its shares fall by 4.54 percent; Jiugui Liquor Co lost 4.1 percent and Anhui Gujing Distillery Company shed 7.88 percent. Calls to the companies went unanswered Monday.

 

Market analysts said the sudden stock plunge was triggered by China’s new premier Li Keqiang declaring his determination to fight corruption and curb government expenditures.

 

“Within the term of my government . spending on official hospitality, overseas trips for official business and the purchase of official vehicles will decrease, not increase,” Li said Sunday when he met the press for the first time as China’s premier.

 

“What the premier said certainly has a direct negative impact on liquor stocks, especially for high-end companies,” Yang Qingshan, an independent liquor analyst, told the Global Times Monday, noting that high-end liquor is usually viewed as a necessity for official hospitality, so any rules to limit government spending will reduce sales.

 

It is not the first time that liquor makers’ stocks have dipped suddenly.

 

In December last year, the Central Military Commission of the Communist Party of China ruled that receptions for high-ranking officials would no longer feature liquor or luxury banquets.

 

The news dragged down shares of liquor makers over the following days.

 

“The military is considered a big consumer of high-end liquor in China. The rule hit the country’s liquor makers, but also presented a push for them to change their targeted customers from governments to ordinary consumers,” said Yang, noting that he personally is still very optimistic toward long-term development of the Chinese liquor industry, which has already become a cultural tradition in China.

 

 

——

South Africa: Fears that Cape Town liquor laws will ‘fuel illegal trade’

 

Source: BD LIve

by Bekezela Phakathi

19 March 2013

 

CAPE Town’s contentious by-law banning liquor sales on Sundays and after 6pm on weekdays will come into effect at the end of this month amid concerns that the ban will do little to curb alcohol abuse, but will fuel the illegal trade in liquor and hurt small-scale traders.

 

The move by Cape Town to shorten trading hours is an attempt by city authorities to lessen liquor abuse, hooliganism and violent crime, as well as to expose establishments selling liquor illegally.

 

The South African Police Service 2010-11 crime statistics found that nationally, half of patients who die in transport-related incidents have elevated blood-alcohol content and 77% of all deaths caused by sharp objects involved positive alcohol levels.

 

The Democratic Alliance-run Western Cape has gained a reputation for its strict liquor regulations in recent years, with some labelling it a “nanny state”. Western Cape Premier Helen Zille has said alcohol abuse is the main cause of violent crime.

 

Gauteng is also moving to ban the sale of liquor on Sundays. The draft Gauteng Liquor Act was introduced in the legislature on Friday. The bill calls for amendments to the 2003 Liquor Act.

 

If promulgated, Sunday liquor sales at all establishments would be banned. These include bottle stores, restaurants and bars.

 

But KwaZulu-Natal seems set to relax its liquor laws. The KwaZulu-Natal Liquor Act is awaiting final amendments before it is passed, and under the new law, liquor stores will be allowed to open on Sundays. The KwaZulu-Natal liquor authority says allowing outlets to trade on Sundays would be in line with the constitution which recognises the country as a secular state, and that the existing Sunday ban is a remnant of the previous regime.

 

“I think banning will not solve the problem. Traders will just go underground . an alternative would be investing in educational campaigns,” South African Liquor Traders Association president Saint Madlala said.

 

He said while the association was cognisant of the effects of alcohol abuse and the need for regulation, banning liquor sales on Sundays would hit traders hard and force some to retrench their staff. Mr Madlala said liquor traders made between 20% and 30% of their profits on Sundays.

 

In terms of Cape Town’s Liquor Trading Days and Hours by-law, liquor stores will no longer be allowed to sell alcohol on Sundays, or after 6pm from Monday to Saturday – while clubs, hotels and casinos, among others, can extend their cut-off time to sell liquor from 2am to 4am, on condition they apply for an exemption. Traders in liquor for off-premises consumption also have to stop trading at 6pm.

 

City authorities said traders will have to abide by new trading hours, regardless of the liquor licence they hold. This follows a 12-month implementation period for the Western Cape Liquor Act, which ends on March 31.

 

 

——

Beer battle of bad taste: Carlsberg out shocks Heineken

 

Source: Beverage Daily

Mar 18th

 

Carlsberg UK has bent the bad taste envelope further still with an ‘edgy’ new online video that sees the drink’s fans phone their friends in the early hours and persuade them to visit a gambling den staffed by sinister characters or ‘actors’ to pay off their debts.

 

http://www.beveragedaily.com/Markets/Beer-battle-of-bad-taste-Carlsberg-out-shocks-Heineken

 

 

——

‘No chance of a glut’ say NZ winemakers as they celebrate bumper crop

 

Source: Decanter

by Chris Mercer

Monday 18 March 2013

Many New Zealand winemakers, excited at the prospect of an outstanding 2013 vintage and a chance to replenish stocks after the low grape haul in 2012, are playing down talk of a glut.

 

‘Stunning’ summer weather and a dry autumn may be causing drought issues in some sections of New Zealand agriculture, but it has led to ‘fantastic’ growing and ripening conditions for the country’s wine industry, generic body New Zealand Winegrowers said this week.

 

‘We are expecting a very high quality harvest in all our regions,’ NZ Winegrowers’ CEO, Philip Gregan, told Decanter.com.

 

‘Quality is looking outstanding, with extended long, warm ripening conditions and no disease pressure,’ added Yealands Estate owner Peter Yealands, based in Awatere Valley, Marlborough.

 

Most forecasts are for a bigger harvest than the record low in 2012, although there is not yet a more accurate prediction. Initial signs show a lot of variation between vineyards in expected grape hauls.

 

New Zealand remains sensitive to signs it could return to the dark days of a wine glut that threatened to cause financial havoc in some regions in recent years. Fresh concerns have been raised in national media in the past week.

 

‘There’s no chance of a glut,’ said Alastair Maling MW, of Villa Maria, which has vineyards across Marlborough, Hawkes Bay, Gisborne and Auckland. He said the best bet is for a moderate-sized harvest.

 

Gregan said that ‘increased volumes will allow re-build in inventory levels, which are desperately low following the small 2012 harvest and are needed to support packaged export sales which are now 6% above last year’.

 

Yealands largely agreed. ‘Given the rapid growth in sales across all markets, the low stock levels of 2012 wine available, and the promise of an outstanding quality vintage, we anticipate any upside in volume will be promptly sold,’ he told Decanter.com.

 

 

——

Jim Barrett of Chateau Montelena dies

 

Source: Decanter

by Courtney Humiston in Sonoma

Monday 18 March 2013

 

James L Barrett, founder of Napa Valley’s Chateau Montelena, has died at the age of 86 – ‘of a life well lived’, as his son Bo said.

 

Jim Barrett, who died on 14 March, founded the Calistoga winery in 1972, and shot almost immediately to world renown when critics famously favoured his 1973 Chardonnay over four white Burgundies at the 1976 Paris Tasting.

 

Chateau Montelena -along with the Cabernet Sauvignon of Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars, which out-scored top Bordeaux producers at the same tasting-is often credited with elevating the status of Napa Valley wines in the international marketplace and laying the foundation for the commercial success they are today.

In 2010 one of the last bottles of ex-cellar 1973 Chardonnay was sold at a London auction for US$11,325 (£7,419).

 

In a statement Barrett’s son Bo paid tribute to a ‘tough and loving’ man.

 

‘I join with my family to announce the sad news that my father, Jim Barrett, passed away today at the age of 86. He was a tough and loving man who will be greatly missed at home, at the winery and throughout the Napa Valley. My father bought Chateau Montelena in 1972 and has worked hard every day since to grow the best grapes and produce the best wines. My dad died of a life well lived.

 

‘He, along with the entire family, has prepared a succession plan for Chateau Montelena which will ensure the winery stays in our family for as many decades going forward as we have enjoyed during his life. There will be no changes to the current plan, Chateau Montelena has a wonderful future, for which we have been working toward over the past 40 years with improvements and upgrades to maintain the calibre of wines we produce.’

 

Barrett, a former attorney and veteran of the Korean war, rescued the historic winery, which was originally completed in 1888, from neglect and dilapidation. The building was recently placed on the National Register of Historic Places thanks, in part, to Barrett’s careful restoration and the significance of his contribution to the California wine industry.

 

Chateau Montelena will remain in the family – as it always has – with Bo Barrett, who has been the director of winemaking since 1982, assuming the role of CEO.

 

In addition to its Chardonnay, Chateau Montelena makes Cabernet Sauvignon from the Calistoga estate (as it has since 1978) as well as Zinfandel and Riesling. The wine has a reputation for maintaining the elegance of an ‘old world’ style that was Barrett’s original vision.

 

 

——

Paul Hobbs Imports becomes sole US importer for Chilean producer Viña Perez Cruz

 

Source: Paul Hobbs Imports

March 18, 2013

 

Viña Perez Cruz, a familyowned producer of 100% estate-bottled red wines from the Maipo Alto Valley region of Chile, has appointed Paul Hobbs Imports as its United States importer.

 

“We are excited to have Paul Hobbs Imports as our importer and partner for the complex US marketplace. They are the perfect team to focus on developing national distribution and adding value to our brand,” says Felipe Valenzuela, export director for Viña Perez Cruz.

 

Viña Perez Cruz was founded by Mrs. Mariana Cruz-Costa and her 11 sons and daughters in memory of Mr. Pablo Perez-Zañartu, who in 1963 acquired the Liguai de Huelquén Estate, located approximately 28 miles southeast of Santiago, Chile. In 1994, red grape varieties were planted, and in 2001, a state-of-theart winery was built. The first Viña Perez Cruz wines were made in 2002. Current releases include Cabernet Sauvignon, Carmenère, Cot, Syrah and three blends: Quelen (Petite Verdot, Carmenère, Cot); Liguai (Syrah, Carmenère, Cabernet Sauvignon); and Chaski (Petit Verdot, Carmenère, Cabernet Sauvignon).

 

 

——

Maine: Legislators push for details on Maine liquor contract options

 

Source: Maine Sun Journal

Matthew Stone, Bangor Daily news

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

 

Lawmakers on the panel charged with determining a path forward for Maine’s wholesale liquor business quizzed the state’s alcoholic beverages director Monday, asking him how soon the state could strike a new deal, whether it could periodically revisit the terms and how the state could crack down on marketing alcoholic beverages to children.

 

But the Legislature’s Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee didn’t appear to move closer to a particular approach for renegotiating the state’s wholesale liquor contract during the first session held to work out the details of two bills proposed to rework the liquor contract and use the increased proceeds to pay back Maine’s $484 million hospital debt.

 

“I’m not going to spend 10 years of my life looking back, like some people, thinking we should have done this differently,” said Rep. Diane Russell, D-Portland. “I’d like to know at the end of the day that we explored every option, that every option was on the table and that we really did fight for the people to get the best deal.”

 

The committee is considering two approaches to striking a more profitable deal for the state on its wholesale liquor business and using the proceeds to repay Maine’s hospitals for a Medicaid debt that stretches back to 2009.

 

Gov. Paul LePage, who has made the issue the cornerstone of his legislative agenda this winter, unveiled his plan in January to pay down the state’s hospital debt using a revenue bond backed by the state’s future liquor profits. Gerry Reid, who directs the state Bureau of Alcoholic Beverages and Lottery Operations, has said the plan involves realizing more value from its wholesale liquor business by negotiating more favorable contract terms for the state, lowering retail prices to make them more competitive with neighboring New Hampshire’s, and allowing agency liquor stores higher margins on liquor sales.

 

A competing proposal from Sen. Seth Goodall of Richmond, the Senate Democratic leader, requires an upfront payment – $200 million by June 30, 2015 – from the contractor who wins the 10-year bid to operate the state’s wholesale liquor business. Under the plan, Goodall says the state can rely on the upfront payment revenue to pay off the hospital debt by Sept. 30 of this year. Maine’s share of the hospital debt is $186 million, which would trigger a $298 million matching payment from the federal government.

 

The Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee held a daylong hearing on the two bills last week and plans to resume work on them Friday.

 

The state’s liquor business has grown and improved its operations since it was leased out to the current contract holder, Maine Beverage Co., in 2004, said Rep. John Schneck, D-Bangor. Given the data available on the business’ performance, the state should easily be able to define what it wants from a vendor in a request for bids and almost be assured of favorable returns, he said.

 

“It could almost run on autopilot,” said Schneck. “It’s a long-range deal, and because we know how the market’s operating, we can forecast this thing very easily and whatever targets we set with the contract should be easily obtainable for both parties.”

 

Reid said there’s little risk that the state’s liquor business will underperform his conservative expectations for growth. It would take natural disasters, new taxes on alcohol or major limits on advertising alcoholic beverages to make a dent in consumer demand, he said.

 

“The consumer is relatively inelastic. You really have to be dumb to mess up this business,” he said. “That’s not to say someone can’t do it. It’s a low-risk business.”

 

But it could still be advantageous for the state to be able to revisit the terms of the 10-year contract periodically, every two years, for example, to make sure Maine is still getting the best deal possible, Schneck said.

 

“I don’t see any reason why there couldn’t be some period for adjustment, so every two years, the parties look at where we are and negotiate going forward,” he said. “In terms of the last contract, it would have been very, very beneficial to the taxpayers.”

 

The state in 2004 leased out the wholesale liquor business in exchange for a $125 million upfront payment and an annual cut of profits that has amounted to about $8.5 million in recent years. Democrats and Republicans have agreed the state could have struck a better deal a decade ago.

 

As state officials look ahead to a new liquor deal, lawmakers Monday recommended investing in enforcement of the state’s liquor laws, substance abuse programs and education efforts to prevent alcohol abuse. Russell, the Portland Democrat, suggested writing language into a contract with a new liquor operator to crack down on the marketing of alcoholic beverages to those younger than 21.

 

“We need some sort of leverage to address terrible marketing practices and to address pulling stuff off the shelves that has no business being on the shelves,” she said.

 

 

——

Tennessee: House Speaker – Tennessee wine in grocery store bill in limbo

 

Source: Commercial Appeal

By Richard Locker

March 19, 2013

 

State House Speaker Beth Harwell said Monday she’s disappointed with last week’s committee vote that dealt the wine-in-grocery-stores bill a potentially fatal blow for this year, but she likely won’t ask the committee chairman to reconsider his vote against the bill.

 

Along with lobbyists and other lawmakers, Harwell left a glimmer of hope Monday for supporters of the bill, which would allow local referendums in towns and cities with liquor stores and liquor by the drink on whether local grocery stores can sell wine.

 

It failed by one vote last week in the House Local Government Committee. Its chairman, Rep. Matthew Hill, R-Jonesborough, cast a surprising vote against the bill – after voting for it a week earlier in a subcommittee. Harwell, a Nashville Republican who supports the bill, appointed Hill as chairman of the committee in January.

 

The Speaker said she had not talked with Hill since the committee’s vote last week. The legislature recessed on Thursday for the weekend and Harwell was in Pennsylvania for funeral services for her mother.

 

Lawmakers began returning to the Capitol on Monday afternoon to find the wine bill – which is opposed by liquor retailers and wholesalers and backed by grocery chains – still in limbo. Despite its defeat in the House committee, a Senate committee held a hearing on it later in the week and its Senate sponsor said he was going to see if the House might reconsider.

 

When reporters asked Harwell if she would ask Hill to reconsider his vote, she said: “I’m probably not going to; that’s not the way I function. He’s made his vote. I was disappointed … That was not my understanding of how his vote was going to be in committee.

 

“If he had some concerns and they were valid concerns, I had talked to him about having an opportunity to work on those. We were all going to have to come to the table (for negotiations toward a compromise). But the bill needed to make movement that day. So again, I was disappointed but I haven’t had a chance to talk to Matthew yet.”

 

Does that mean the bill is dead for the 2013 legislative session?

 

“I don’t know. I’ve talked briefly to Lt. Gov. (Ron) Ramsey about it, but I’ve been out of pocket and just really got back into town but we’ll talk about it this week.”

 

Lobbyists working for the bill said Monday there are other bills that could be used in place of the one defeated last week.

 

 

——

New York: Bloomberg takes aim at cigarette displays

 

Source: FT

By Shannon Bond in New York

March 18th

 

New York City stores would have to keep cigarettes out of sight under new legislation proposed by Michael Bloomberg, in the mayor’s latest effort to curb smoking.

 

Under the proposed law, tobacco products would have to be kept in cabinets, drawers, under the counter or behind a curtain. They would be allowed to be visible only during a purchase by an adult customer or during restocking.

 

The measure aims to reduce smoking among young people, Mr Bloomberg said on Monday.

 

“Young people are targets of marketing and the availability of cigarettes, and this legislation will help prevent another generation from the ill health and shorter life expectancy that comes with smoking,” he said.

 

The city banned smoking in restaurants and bars in 2002, and expanded that restriction in 2011 to public parks and beaches.

 

While initially controversial, that measure has been widely imitated in the US and around the world. It has shown results in New York, where the smoking rate among adults fell from 21.5 per cent in 2002 to 14.8 per cent in 2011.

 

But youth smoking has been flat at 8.5 per cent since 2007, said Thomas Farley, health commissioner, and smoking remains the leading preventable cause of death in the city.

 

The proposal did not sit well with tobacco companies, which said the existing federal ban on sales to cigarettes to people under 18 was sufficient.

 

“To the extent that this proposed law would ban the display of products to adult tobacco consumers, we believe it goes too far,” said Altria, whose brands include Marlboro, Parliament and Virginia Slims.

 

Antismoking advocates applauded the measure. “[The legislation would] prohibit massive store displays of tobacco products that tell kids tobacco use is normal and acceptable, while tempting smokers trying to quit into buying more cigarettes,” said Matthew Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

 

Mr Bloomberg’s latest initiative follows a setback last week to another pillar of his mission to improve public health: his fight against obesity. The day before a ban on large sugary drinks was to take effect, a judge blocked it, ruling that the city’s board of health had overstepped its authority. Unlike the soda ban, however, the proposed tobacco law will go before the city council for consideration.

 

Stores would still be able to advertise tobacco products, the mayor said. But owners of convenience stores, where cigarettes are usually displayed prominently behind the cash register, are likely to oppose any measures to curb sales.

 

“We think it’s absurd,” said Jim Calvin, president of the New York Association of Convenience Stores, an industry group. “We have a fundamental right to communicate with customers about the products that we sell on our premises.”

 

He added: “In order to accept [the city’s rationale] you would have to believe that the mere sight of packs of cigarettes on a wall behind the counter in a store compels kids to start smoking. Does seeing beer in a cooler in a store compel them to start drinking?”

 

Another industry group, the National Association of Tobacco Outlets, said the proposal “infringes on a retailer’s free-speech rights” in violation of the first amendment.

 

Countries including Iceland, Canada, Australia, England, Ireland and Norway have restricted tobacco displays. While Mr Bloomberg said on Monday that the law would make New York the first US city to keep tobacco products out of sight, a similar measure was enacted briefly last year by the town of Haverstraw, New York.

 

That ordinance banned public displays of tobacco products, advertising and signage in convenience stores and replaced them with a menu of products available by request. It was rescinded three months later after a lawsuit brought by several tobacco companies and the convenience store association, who argued the ban violated the first amendment.

 

“We all had the same concern about absurd regulations that would attempt to force us to hide the products that we’ve been licensed by the state and the city to sell to adult customers,” Mr Calvin said.

 

Cigarettes make up a much smaller proportion of sales at New York City convenience stores than nationally, Mr Calvin said – about 10 per cent, compared with 30 or 35 per cent (excluding petrol sales) across the country.

 

He said the low rate was due to illegal sales of untaxed cigarettes, spurred by high city and state excise taxes in New York.

 

Mr Bloomberg announced a second bill on Monday that would target such illegal sales and smuggling by strengthening enforcement and increasing penalties on retailers who evade taxes or sell tobacco without a licence.

 

 

——

UK: wine, spirits sales fall as consumers cut costs: WSTA

 

Source: DBR

18 March 2013

 

Alcohol volume sales in the UK have fallen by 3% in the off-trade and 4% in the on-trade in 2012 driven by year-on-year alcohol duty rises, according to a market report by UK-based organization for the wine and spirit industry Wine & Spirit Trade Association (WSTA).

 

If the Alcohol Duty Escalator carries on at the current rate till 2015, duty on wine and spirits will have increased by 50% and 44%, respectively, since 2008. This rise in alcohol duty has forced consumers to cut back their spending on alcohol in the country.

 

Though the alcohol volume sales have dropped, the prices have gone up by 2% in the off-trade and 3% in the on-trade, primarily helped by tax increase of over 5% in 2012.

 

In the off-trade markets, sparkling wine reported highest volume growth of 8% over the last 12 months, mainly due to fall in Champagne sales and consumers looking for cheap wines, whereas in the on-trade markets, liqueurs reported highest volume growth of 13% in 2012.

 

WSTA chief executive Miles Beale said the latest market report shows that consumers are continuing to cut their spending on alcohol, which resulted in sales falling in both the on- and off-trade.

 

“While it had been hoped that Christmas would provide a small boost for the industry these figures show that there was subdued festive cheer over the Christmas period,” Beale added.

 

“This is a further sign that the Government needs to think again before increasing prices through the unpopular duty escalator, which risks damaging jobs and growth.”

Liquor Industry News 3-12-13

March 12, 2013
www.franklinliquors.com

Franklin Liquors

 

Tuesday March 12th 2013

Today Is A Biodynamic LEAF Day.

Diageo overhauls its supply chain (Additional Information)

 

Source: FT

By Louise Lucas, Consumer Industries Correspondent

Mar 11th

 

Diageo, the world’s biggest distiller, is devolving supply chain operations to country level as emerging markets account for an ever bigger slice of sales.

 

The move will shrink regional operations, making annual savings of £60m after three years, and enable the maker of Johnnie Walker whisky and Smirnoff vodka to respond to the needs of its 21 key markets.

 

As emerging markets account for an ever bigger slice of sales – Diageo is targeting 50 per cent by February 2016 and is already at 43 per cent – multinationals are adapting their global footprints in areas including procurement and marketing.

 

Diageo said that recent acquisitions of local liquors in China, Turkey and Brazil changed the way the supply dynamics worked.

 

“A couple of years ago one big supply chain worked because we were selling mainly our premium brands and had a straightforward portfolio,” said a spokesman for the company.

 

“With the emerging markets getting bigger and acquiring companies with big local footprints, including their own supply basis, it makes more sense to be operated where the demand side is.”

 

Emerging markets sales grew 14 per cent year-on-year in the first half, compared with 5 per cent for the overall group, helping to increase operating profit 21 per cent.

 

Some of the strongest growth came from Latin America and the Caribbean, where sales were up 18 per cent. However, the fast growing Scotch category, in Latin America, Asia and Africa, offers less flexibility on supply – Scotch whisky has to be distilled in Scotland.

 

The shake-up of the supply chain follows a similar refocus of the group’s sales and marketing operations, which resulted in the global operation being broken up into five regional divisions and then into local markets.

 

The annual savings will kick in from financial year 2016 and there will be a £100m restructuring charge. Diageo said it was too early to say how many jobs would be affected.

 

As emerging markets grow in scale more companies are mulling how best to handle corporate services which have in the past decade or so been handled at regional level, with, for example, each country in a region possibly requiring only a couple of marketing executives.

 

Sukand Ramachandran, London head of operations practice at Boston Consulting Group, said: “Now companies are actively growing these markets and volumes have changed, so the question is asked: is my region adding value?”

 

Procurement, logistics and distribution is paramount in the drinks industry – brewers joke that they are in the business of logistics rather than beer.

 

Regulation, geography and infrastructure also play a part. Mr Ramachandran said that in the service sector, where regulations drive the need for controls on local countries, the regional role remains important.

 

In large countries with remote regions companies are being more creative in terms of distribution. In Brazil, both Diageo and AB InBev, the world’s biggest brewer, sell through branded bars. In the US, alcohol has to be sold via third-party distributors.

 

 

——

Scots jobs at risk as Diageo unveil restructure plans

 

Source: The Scotsman

By GARETH MACKIE

11 March 2013

 

DRINKS giant Diageo has unveiled plans to restructure its global supply operations in a shake-up that is expected to lead to job losses among its 4,000 employees in Scotland.

 

The maker of Johnnie Walker whisky and Smirnoff vodka said the overhaul, which is aimed at giving local management more responsibility in balancing supply and demand, is designed to save £60 million a year.

 

Diageo, headed by chief executive Paul Walsh, said the move will lead to one-off costs of about £100m as responsibility for local operations transfers to the group’s 21 “key” markets, and regional supply structures are reduced.

 

While a spokesman acknowledged that some jobs could be at risk as a result of the review, he said it was too early to tell what the impact will be.

 

He added: “Further work will be required to establish the exact nature of the reorganisation but there is likely to be some impact on employees.

 

“Therefore, as decisions are made, these will be shared with our employees and their representatives first and foremost.”

 

Unite’s national officer for the drinks industry, Jennie Formby, said the union noted yesterday’s announcement with “some trepidation” as it follows Diageo’s decision in 2009 to close its Johnnie Walker bottling works in Kilmarnock and the Port Dundas distillery in Glasgow with the loss of about 850 jobs.

 

She said: “Workers and communities are still smarting from the brutal decision to close those sites to cut costs. We will be looking for early assurances from management that our members won’t pay the price for this restructuring.”

 

Diageo said the shake-up of its supply operation, which spans the purchasing of raw materials and services through to production and distribution, follows a review of its entire operating model two years ago and is a result of its “increasing presence” in fast-growing markets across Africa, Asia, eastern Europe and Latin America.

 

These regions accounted for some 42 per cent of Diageo’s net sales during the first half of its financial year, pushing up demand for Scotch brands such as Buchanan’s. However, sales of J&B fell by almost a third as demand eased in France and Spain. To overcome falling sales across western Europe, the group is looking to tap into growing demand from the burgeoning middle classes in emerging economies such as India, where the alcohol sector is predicted to expand by 15 per cent annually over the next five years.

 

Last year, Diageo agreed to pay £1.3 billion for a majority stake in Vijay Mallya’s United Spirits, which owns Whyte & Mackay and has a 41 per cent share of the Indian market. It is also spending £23m to form a joint venture with Mallya to run United National Breweries’ traditional sorghum beer business in South Africa.

 

But the group surprised the market in December by pulling the plug on long-running talks to acquire Jose Cuervo, the world’s best-selling tequila, worth an estimated $3bn (£2bn).

 

It has since unveiled plans to develop its own tequila brand using a similar strategy to Ciroc, the premium vodka launched by the company in 2003 that enjoyed growth of 62 per cent last year.

 

The group did not give any timescales for the completion of its supply chain overhaul, which is expected to see some layers of management removed across its global operations.

 

It said: “An initial review has already established that efficiency-driven cost savings can be delivered which, together with savings from footprint changes and cost reductions in respect of the regional supply organisations, are expected to amount to approximately £60m per annum.”

 

 

——

Diageo PLC: Cost savings in greater supply

 

Source: Barclays

Mar 11th

 

Stock Rating/Industry View: Overweight/Neutral

Price Target: GBP 21.50 (from GBP 20.40)

Price (08-Mar-2013): GBP 19.94

Potential Upside/Downside: +8%

Tickers: DGE LN / DGE.L

 

Self-help underpins a robust top-line: The announcement of an incremental £60m cost savings initiative – worth 30p per share – follows a review of Diageo’s Global Supply and Procurement operations and comes on the heels of the 2011 Operating Model Review. The latter itself underpinned the group’s medium-term growth targets of c.6% sales growth and 200bps of margin expansion by F14e. With the price/mix story in spirits and Diageo’s core markets like the US gathering momentum, top-line enhancement to come from the USL deal, positive FX tailwinds and after underperforming SABMiller and Pernod by 9% and 8% respectively YTD (GBP adj.), there is greater scope for relative upside in Diageo in the near term, in our view. Following the earnings adjustments outlined below, we increase our price target to 2150p.

 

Aligning Global Supply and Key Markets: Diageo is enhancing the alignment between its Global Supply and Procurement operations and its Key 21 operating markets. As a result, local operations will be transferred to in-market subsidiaries and overall regional operating structures will be reduced in scale and reach. The company expects this programme to result in £60m of annualised cost savings by year three (F16e). Diageo expects to incur £100m of exceptional restructuring costs as a result. With the group aiming to continuously offset half of its COGS inflation via savings/efficiencies, and with work on identifying cost saving opportunities ongoing, there is still scope for the £60m savings target to rise further, in our view.

 

Benefits back-end loaded: Given that production savings often take longer to deliver than straightforward headcount reductions, we expect the benefits to be back-end loaded. We estimate incremental savings of £5m in F13e, a cumulative £20m in F14e, £40m in F15e and £60m in F16e. We expect the bulk of these savings to come in Europe and North America. The programme should drive 1.5% earnings enhancement over time – equivalent to a present value per share of c.30p. We expect the associated P&L exceptional costs to be phased £25m in F13e, £45m in F14e and £30m in F15e.

 

Earnings upgraded by 4-5% for saving and FX: We raise our estimates to reflect both the additional cost savings and recent sterling weakness. We increase our F14e group EPS forecast by 4.4%, (0.5% to reflect the new cost savings and 3.9% for FX – USD/GBP 1.49). Our F13e estimates are up by 0.8% to 103.3p.

 

 

——

Great Britain has a drinking problem; U.S. shouldn’t import it

 

Source: Daily Freeman

By Glenn Gilbert / The Oakland Press

March 10, 2013

 

The movie “Field of Dreams” produced a notion that has embedded itself firmly in the American psyche:

 

“If you build it, they will come.”

 

Research has consistently shown that is the case with facilities that sell alcoholic beverages. The more stores there are, the more alcohol that is sold – with its attendant increase in drunken driving, underage consumption, addiction and crime.

 

But a national deregulation movement that some say has been promulgated by the alcohol industry has taken hold in some states and is being pushed in others.

 

Deregulation may make sense in fields like energy, because the resulting competition leads to lower prices. But lower alcohol prices will spawn more alcohol consumption. Is that really what we want?

 

Good grief, we could end up like Britain, according to Pamela S. Erickson, a national leader in the fight against excess access to alcohol.

 

The United Kingdom is an example of what can happen in a totally deregulated environment, she said.

 

“Today alcohol is available in bars, clubs and grocery stores 24 hours a day, seven days a week,” Erickson said. “They have little regulation, poor enforcement and lots of cheap alcohol. The also have an alcohol epidemic on their hands.”

 

Four large grocery chains control 75 percent of the market, Erickson said. Most use alcohol as a loss leader, as they engage in price wars.

 

“Drinking at home has increased,” she said.

 

And there has been a large increase in public disorder crimes around bars – vomiting, urination, fights and vandalism.

 

“England has a drinking problem,” wrote Tim Heffernan in the November-December issue of Washington Monthly.

 

“Since 1990, teenage alcohol consumption has doubled. Since World War II, alcohol intake for the population as a whole has doubled, with a third of that increase occurring since just 1995. The United Kingdom has very high rates of binge and heavy drinking, with the average Brit consuming the equivalent of nearly 10 liters of pure ethanol per year,” Heffernan wrote.

 

The United States is in comparatively better shape.

 

“A third of the country does not drink, and teenage drinking is at a historic low,” Heffernan wrote. “The rate of alcohol use among seniors in high school has fallen 25 percentage points since 1980. Glassing is something that happens in movies, not at the corner bar.

 

“Why has the United States, so similar to Great Britain in everything from language to pop culture trends, managed to avoid the huge spike of alcohol abuse that has gripped the UK? The reasons are many, but one stands out above all: the market in Great Britain is rigged to foster excessive alcohol consumption in ways it is not in the United States – at least not yet.”

 

One state currently considering deregulation, Michigan, has good control of the industry, said Mike Tobias, executive director of Michigan Alcohol Policy Promoting Health and Safety. Michigan’s system of regulations has succeeded in helping reduce problems related to alcohol use.

 

Since 1997, underage drinking has declined significantly as measured by the Michigan Youth Risk Behavior Survey.

 

The number of Michigan teens who had used alcohol was 68.8 percent in 2009, down from 81.9 percent in 1997 and below the national average of 72.5 percent.

 

Alcohol use before the age of 13 was 18.8 percent in 2009, down from 34.9 percent in 1997, and lower than the national average of 21.1 percent.

 

Binge drinking among teens affected 23.2 percent of them in 2009, down from 32.4 percent in 1997 and below the national average of 24.2 percent.

 

With statistics like these, why would Michigan want to change its approach with legislation that would diminish verification requirements for alcohol license applicants, increase the number of resort liquor licenses and allow beer to be shipped directly to consumers? Why would any state?

 

 

——

51 Die in Libya From Homemade Alcohol

 

Source: ABC News

By ESAM MOHAMED

March 11, 2013

 

Libya’s Health Minister says 51 people have died over the past three days from drinking homemade alcohol that contained poisonous methanol.

 

Minister Nouri Doghman says another 330 people were injured from the alcohol since Saturday.

 

He said Monday that some were blinded, while others went into comas or suffered kidney failure.

 

He says the dead range in age from 19 to 50 years old, and that Algerians and Tunisians are among the dead.

 

The sale and consumption of alcohol is banned in the conservative North African country. Like illegal drugs elsewhere, some Libyans turn to black market dealers to buy alcohol, which is often cooked in people’s homes or deserted farms.

 

The ministry says it is investigating the case.

 

 

——

Two years too long? Pernod Ricard’s lengthy CEO succession is a long wait between drinks

 

Source: BRW

Michael Bleby

12 March 2013

 

Two years too long? Pernod Ricard’s lengthy CEO succession is a long wait between drinks

 

Succession planning is a good thing, but sometimes you wonder if it’s overdone. Just ask Alexandre Ricard. Ricard was 40 last year when he was named chief executive-designate of Pernod Ricard, France’s biggest distiller. It was a great gig to land, but he won’t take the job for another two years.

 

It makes things awkward because way in advance of taking the job, people wonder what you’ll do differently when you’re in charge. It’s a question journalists like to ask. It can be more awkward when they ask and you’re sitting next to the current CEO – to whom you report and will do so for the next couple of years.

 

Of course, you don’t become CEO-designate of a company like Pernod Ricard if you’re not someone who can parry a journalist’s questions with ease.

 

“It’s probably a question for another couple of years’ time,” Ricard said without missing a beat. “But in the meantime, and I think the best way of saying it is that the current strategy of Pernod Ricard under Pierre’s leadership is delivering, clearly.”

 

Sitting right next to incumbent CEO Pierre Pringuet in a joint interview last week, Ricard then proceeded to go through the details of that strategy.

 

“I don’t see why this would change,” he said. “These have been the clear drivers of our value creation and our success, our collective success.”

 

Ok, so he’s a team player, and a smooth one at that, speaking American-accented English that he no doubt perfected while earning his MBA at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton business school.

 

But you do get a hint that the next man at the top, who will only ascend in June 2015 when Pringuet retires, will be more toned-down in style. If you ask his boss Pringuet how the company’s flagship wine Jacob’s Creek – traditionally seen as a middle-ground drop – can compete in the race to China’s fast-growing premium wine market with rival Penfolds’ wide suite of top-label wines, he gives a blunt response.

 

Pringuet, a former French civil servant, is disdainful of comparisons of his company with Penfolds owner Treasury Wine Estates.

 

“The answer is very simple,” he says. “Look at the P&L and look at the company which is profitable and I think you have the answer to your question.”

 

Hubris is a great tool, but can leave you open to attack. Pernod Ricard last month reported a 5.8 per cent increase in its half-year operating profit to ?1.46 billion ($1.85 billion), while over the same period, TWE’s earnings before interest and tax fell 20 per cent from a year earlier to $73.4 million. Of course, over the past year, the French company’s 26 per cent share-price rise is nearly doubled by TWE’s 48 per cent gain.

 

At this point, Ricard steps into the conversation, dispensing diplomacy

 

“Just to add – one of the key strategic pillars to our strategy is premiumisation,” he says. “We have embarked on a premiumisation strategy a few years ago which is clearly delivering results – if you look at our P&L indeed. Both in terms of driving price by investing behind the brands, Jacob’s Creek being the key one, by driving trade-up into our reserves portfolio – Jacob’s Creek Reserves – by driving up as well into our higher marques such as St Hugo. And this is something that we’re doing across all markets.”

 

Pringuet sees less need to be diplomatic. He goes back to his point.

 

“And making profits.”

 

Ricard’s anointing last year happened a bit hurriedly. He had long been seen as the heir-apparent, but the company behind Absolut Vodka was plunged into crisis in August with the sudden death of chairman Patrick Ricard, Alexandre’s 67-year-old uncle. Patrick Ricard, the chief executive for 30 years until he handed over to Pringuet in 2008, mattered. He was the man who had built up the business started on the kitchen table of his father’s house, into a global giant. In 2006, Fortune magazine named him European businessman of the year. In 2007 he received France’s highest honour, the Legion of Honour.

 

Less than two weeks after his death on August 17 – reportedly from a heart attack – the company stated that Alexandre Ricard would step up from his role of managing director for distribution to that of chief operating officer and deputy CEO. The decision, Pringuet says, had already been made “a couple of years ago” and all that happened after Patrick Ricard’s death was that the announcement was brought forward from the November annual general meeting.

 

Ricard now has a couple of years to polish his style further before restoring family leadership to the company founded by his great uncle in 1932 (Pernod, with which it combined in 1975, was established in 1805).

 

But perhaps he won’t be so different to Pringuet after all, if family history is any guide. In 2002, the New York Times reported that after the company had bought Glasgow’s Chivas Regal, the UK’s Guardian newspaper stated: “The one challenge which Pernod is yet to overcome is to teach the British to enjoy a shot of Ricard (pastis) each evening”. Patrick Ricard’s response was suitably glib: “If one day we find a way to convince you, we will do so. You could always improve your taste.”

 

Maybe Alexandre Ricard is just biding his time – and his tongue. It would certainly make the next two years easier.

 

Disclosure: The writer holds TWE shares.

 

 

——

Strength in craft beers being helped by their higher average on-premise checks

 

Source: GuestMetrics

March 12, 2013

 

According to GuestMetrics, based on its POS database of over $8 billion in sales, the strong performance in craft beers is likely being at least partially driven by the higher average check by patrons who purchase craft beers, making the craft segment more attractive to restaurant operators.

 

“In analyzing the average check amount across the two billion checks in our system for table service restaurants and bars, the average check for craft beers is significantly higher than most of the mainstream beer brands,” said Bill Pecoriello, CEO of GuestMetrics LLC. “Based on our data, when a patron orders a craft beer, the average check is around $80, which is well above that of the largest beer brands.  In contrast, the average check is $63 when a Budweiser is ordered, $62 for Coors Light, $60 for Miller Lite, and $52 for Bud Light.  Perhaps surprisingly, the average check when a Yuengling is ordered is only $55, so while we believe there is still plenty of room left for Yuengling to grow as it expands its distribution footprint, there is risk that restaurant operators don’t push as hard on selling the brand given its lower average check size.”  

 

“At the other end of the spectrum, there are several large brands that actually have average check amounts above that of craft beers.  Heineken came in at the top at $89, followed by Stella Artois at $84, Guinness at $83, and Sam Adams at $81,” said Peter Reidhead, VP of Strategy and Insights at GuestMetrics.  “And to round out the picture of the top dozen brands, Corona Extra, Blue Moon, and Dos Equis all had average check amounts below the average for craft beers at $72, $67, and $65, respectively.”

 

“When we factor in the average time spent at the restaurant or bar for each transaction in minutes, the story does not change materially.  The average check amount per minute spent in the restaurant/bar for craft beers is around $1.00, while that of Heineken remains at the top of the group at $1.25, and Miller Lite, Bud Light, and Yuengling have the lowest average check per minute at $0.76, $0.71, and $0.65, respectively,” said Brian Barrett, President of GuestMetrics. “As restaurant operators become increasingly sophisticated in the age of big data, we believe viewing the total amount of money spent on each check depending on which beer brand is ordered will ultimately help the operators optimize their overall sales and profits.”       

 

About GuestMetrics LLC

GuestMetrics, LLC is revolutionizing how the hospitality industry operates.  Despite the dawn of the Digital Age having begun more than three decades ago, the hospitality industry essentially functions the same way it did centuries before.  GuestMetrics has cracked the code by collecting $8 billion dollars in sales from over 250 million checks from tens of thousands of restaurants, and turning billions of raw transactions into intelligible data that is fundamentally transforming the business operations of everyone from the independently-owned bar/restaurant on the corner, to multi-national chains, to the food & beverage companies that supply them.  Please visit www.GuestMetrics.com for more information and to arrange for a free demonstration.

 

 

——

CEDC Jumps in New York on Debt Swap as Kaufman Cuts Stake

 

Source: Bloomberg

By Halia Pavliva

Mar 11, 2013

 

Central European Distribution Corp. (CEDC), Poland’s second-biggest vodka maker, rose the most since the end of January in New York after a shareholder reduced his stake and the company announced a new debt swap offer.

 

CEDC, as the maker of the Bols, Zubrowka and Zelyonaya Marka brands is known, surged 13 percent to 45 U.S. cents by the close of trading in New York, trimming this year’s tumble to 79 percent. Trading volume was almost four times the average of the past tree months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

 

The new offer reflects terms agreed by CEDC’s biggest shareholder Roust Trading Ltd. and a steering committee of holders of 30 percent of the company’s 2016 notes, according to a statement dated March 8. The plan would give Roust 85 percent of CEDC equity and require other holdings to be reduced to 5 percent. Investor Mark Kaufman, who backed another restructuring plan and has criticized CEDC management, sold about 3.5 million shares last week, cutting his stake to below 5 percent, according to data compiled by Bloomberg and a filing.

 

“The company will now have a better chance to survive as Mr. Kaufman is selling shares,” Krzysztof Kuper, an analyst at Ipopema Securities SA (IPE) who rates CEDC’s U.S. stock hold, said by phone from Warsaw. “Chances for a successful debt restructuring are now higher.”

 

CEDC, based in Warsaw, erased about 50 percent of its market value in 2012 amid slumping sales, rising liabilities and management transitions. Revenue fell 8.7 percent in the third quarter to $191.3 million, after shrinking in the previous two quarters, data collated by Bloomberg show. Chief Executive Officer William Carey stepped down in July.

 

The restructuring aims to reduce CEDC’s debt by as much as $635 million. The company’s shares in Warsaw ended the day 5.8 percent higher at 1.65 zloty, or 52 cents.

 

 

——

Bidders circle £1bn bid for Lucozade and Ribena

 

A £1bn bidding war for Lucozade and Ribena is bubbling up with a raft of private equity firms from Blackstone to Permira considering potential offers for the brands.

 

Source: Daily Telegraph

By Helia Ebrahimi, Senior City Correspondent

11 Mar 2013

 

GlaxoSmithKline chief executive Andrew Witty signalled last month that he wanted to offload the brands, which he described as two of Britain’s most iconic home-grown drinks.

 

An auction is not likely to be launched for some months, but buy-out firms have begun running a rule over the division.

 

Sources suggest that one potential scenario could see Blackstone team up with Lion Capital, the firm behind GHD and All Saints, with ex-Barcadi boss Javier Ferrán taking the role of chairman. The two firms worked together on the buy-out of Orangina before selling the company to Japan’s Suntory in a ?2.6bn (£2.3bn) deal. However, Lion is currently restricted in the amount of money it can invest because of the limited amount of capital left in its fund.

 

Permira, KKR, Bain and CVC are also expected to have an interest. However, drinks-maker Britvic, which had been tipped as the most likely bidder, is thought to be constrained by the likely price tag – as well as potential competition issues.

 

Other potential suitors include corporate buyers like Suntory and Nestle, which would be able to leverage significant synergies from their global infrastructure network.

 

GSK has not yet appointed a bank to run the auction but insiders suggest consumer rainmaker Blair Effron at boutique bank Centreview is the most likely choice.

 

In February, Mr Witty said the brands’ combined sales were £750m but that they remained “poles apart” from the core strategy of GSK’s £26bn pharmaceuticals empire.

 

According to research from Nielsen, Lucozade was the second-biggest soft drinks brand in the UK last year, with two thirds of its sales home grown and the rest coming from Nigeria, Singapore and a fledgling business in China.

 

 

——

Kirin Brewery Co ramps up frozen beer launch (Excerpt)

 

Source: Just-Drinks

By Andy Morton

11 March 2013

 

Kirin Brewery Co is to bring its frozen beer innovation, Ichiban Shibori Frozen Nama, to the world.

 

The Japanese brewer said the brand, which uses a machine to cover the beer with an ice-cold foam head, has been well received in tests in Hawaii, Shanghai and Singapore, and a global launch is lined up for this year. Markets will include New York, Los Angeles, Haiwaii, Florida, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Taiwan, South Korea, the UK and France, a Kirin spokesperson told just-drinks today (11 March).

 

 

——

C&C Group completes acquisition of Gleeson Group

 

Source: DBR

11 March 2013

 

Ireland-based C&C Group said that it has completed the acquisition of M & J Gleeson and its subsidiaries.

 

C&C Group is a manufacturer, marketer and distributor of branded cider and beer.

 

The Group manufactures Bulmers, the leading Irish cider brand, Magners, the premium international cider brand, the Gaymer Cider Company range of branded and private label ciders and the Tennent’s beer brand.

 

C&C Group also owns Woodchuck and Hornsby’s, two of the leading craft cider brands in the US.

 

The Group also distributes a number of beer brands in the Scottish, Irish and Northern Irish markets, primarily for Anheuser-Busch InBev.

 

 

——

NABCA 20th Annual Legal Symposium – March 11, 2013 to March 13, 2013

 

Source: NABCA

Mar 11th

 

NABCA’s 20th Annual Legal Symposium begins this evening with registration and networking.

 

On Tuesday, March 12, sessions begin at 8:30 AM with topics that include: The Three-Tier System: It Survive? Should it Survive?; 21st Amendment Litigation 2013: Commerce Clause, Antitrust and More; and Can the First Amendment Save Controversial Packaging. Concurrent sessions will be held in the afternoon. Topics to be discussed are: Alcohol Regulation by Demographics; Using Social Media to “Sell” Regulation; Responsibility Success Stories; Revising State Regulation; Ethics: Cowboy Ethics (for Regulators) and Ethics:  The Organization as Client (for Lawyers).

 

On Wednesday, March 13, there will be three main sessions:  I-1183 + One; Alcohol Server Liability: The State of Play; and The FAA Act and Exclusion. The Legal Symposium will adjourn at 12 PM.

NABCA anticipates having a great symposium and looks forward to seeing all of the participants. Be on the lookout for summaries about some of the sessions via the Daily News Update, which we will send at the end of the day on Tuesday and in the late afternoon on Wednesday.

 

NABCA will also be Tweeting from the sessions and providing some updates via our Facebook page.

 

 

——

BOOKS: Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey, An American Heritage

 

Source: Ace

BY TIM KNITTEL

March 11, 2013

 

I finished reading Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey, An American Heritage in two days and referenced it repeatedly over the next three. I think that qualifies as a ringing endorsement.

 

As a bourbon education professional, my usage of bourbon historian Mike Veach’s new book as a reference might be unusual. Or perhaps not.

 

Veach is generally considered to be the foremost bourbon historian in the world. He is associate curator of Special Collections at the Filson Historical Society in Louisville, Kentucky and an inductee into the Bourbon Hall of Fame. He regularly teaches classes on bourbon history and appreciation to sold-out crowds.

 

One of the special things about Mike Veach is that he leaves a trail of rare, unique and specialty bourbons in his wake.  He opened two ‘very special’ bottles for the recent launch party at the Filson Society – a 1918 Old Crow and a 1955-56 Old Fitzgerald. (It may be no surprise that the history of both brands are covered at least in part in his book.) I was fortunate enough to get to try both. (I stood next to Mike with an empty glass and begged.) Someone asked him how he comes up with the old and rare bourbons. “People give them to me,” he said

 

This book has been in the works since 1991 when Veach was hired to curate the archives of the Stitzel-Weller distillery. Since then he has been fully immersed in bourbon’s history, working with several spirits companies and the Filson Society.

 

Kentucky Bourbon Whiskey is clearly intended to be an academic reference. It is published by the University Press of Kentucky and has citations and references like a thesis. But that’s just one face of it – it’s also a fascinating read.

 

The book traces the path of bourbon’s origin, growth, collapse, growth again, collapse again and final rebirth as the modern spirit now sweeping the world. This is the story of bourbon – how it was influenced by the development of America and how it influenced America back.

 

The story starts with the founding of the United States, weaves through many wars, the Industrial Revolution, Prohibition, the Great Depression, and concludes in the modern era. People may not be aware – and might not even have been aware at the time – but bourbon has been at the heart of many of the major social and government movements including the taxation system, food and drug regulation, marketing conventions, trademarks and more.

 

“The history of the bourbon industry is a rich one that mirrors the history of America. The Whiskey Rebellion reflects the troubles that the newly united states had coalescing under a federal government. The whiskey tax, which sparked the rebellion, was the first federal tax and prefigured all others, especially the federal income tax. The changes wrought by the Industrial Revolution can be seen as the modernization of distilling technology writ large.”

 

Bourbon’s history is as much lore and legend as its fact and fiction, and maybe moreso. Veach does an excellent job incorporating the legends into his history and analyzes each from a historical accuracy perspective as well as the influence legends had on consumers’ embracing or snubbing of bourbon at various times.

 

The book won’t help to settle bourbon legend disputes because, as Veach writes, “the fact is that we may never know the identity of Kentucky’s first distiller.” Veach provides excellent reason as to why it probably wasn’t Evan Williams, Elijah Craig or anyone else whose name we knew today. But that doesn’t diminish the fun of telling those tales!

 

Kentucky Bourbon History is a fascinating exploration for anyone interested in U.S. history, Kentucky history and, obviously, bourbon history. For bourbon professions this is a must-read. For bourbon enthusiasts, it will top the want-to-read list.

 

http://www.amazon.com/dp/0813141656/ref=as_li_ss_til?tag=lipawe-20&camp=213381&creative=390973&linkCode=as4&creativeASIN=0813141656&adid=03TVMJPKVQY0YHMQ8WYJ&&ref-refURL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aceweekly.com%2F2013%2F03%2Fbooks-kentucky-bourbon-whiskey-an-american-heritage%2F

 

 

——

Oregon wine industry heats up with talk of ‘significant’ California investment

 

Source: The Oregonian

By Dana Tims

March 08, 2013

 

The wine-grape factory that is the Eola Hills is buzzing with word that a major California wine producer is buying vineyards in the area with an eye toward significant future investments.

 

If it’s true, the infusion of cash and acclaim could represent the biggest bump for Oregon’s $2.7 billion commercial wine industry since Robert Drouhin startled the wine world a quarter century ago by being the first French investor in the state’s viticultural future.

 

Wine writers for the past two weeks have been chasing information that Jackson Family Wines, the Napa-based owner of Kendall Jackson, LaCrema and other prominent brands, has bought, or is in the process of buying, two large vineyards in the Eola-Amity Hills area of Polk County.

 

The two parcels, totaling 460 acres, were developed by Premier Pacific Vineyards in the mid-2000s, before the Napa-based company sold its Oregon holdings.

 

Richard Wollack, Premier Pacific’s managing trustee, said this week the stories are true.

 

“It appears that Kendall Jackson bought two of the properties that we developed,” he said. “And they are really good properties. They were developed with the state of the art.”

 

Wollack said Oregon’s ability to produce pinot noir grapes — a preferred varietal of Jackson Family Wines’ LaCrema label — explains the growing interest in doing business here.

 

“We believe that Oregon is America’s Burgundy,” he said. “Probably the best indication of that is that you can’t go to a decent restaurant anywhere in the country that doesn’t have an Oregon pinot noir on the wine list. Ten years ago, that would have been unheard of.”

 

Aimee Sands, Jackson Family Wines’ senior communications manager, declined Friday to address specifics, saying, “We do not discuss rumors or speculation nor do we share details around grape purchases or wines prior to release.”

 

She added, “However, as specialists in cool-climate varietals we’ve always focused on exploring the finest growing regions for Pinot Noir and Chardonnay, and the Willamette Valley has an excellent reputation.”

 

Dundee winemaker Joe Dobbes, reached Thursday at a trade event in Chicago, said he has signed a contract with LaCrema calling for him to make a “significant” amount of pinot noir for that label from grapes harvested in Oregon last fall.

 

Dobbes said he could not comment, though, on whether the company has bought vineyards in the state.

 

“But if they decide to make a permanent play in Oregon, I think that’s a good thing to have a major serious producer with large distribution working here,” said Dobbes, whose company, Wine By Joe, has received two significant infusions of cash in the past year from Bacchus Capital Management, a San Francisco- and New York-based investment firm. “We’re still a young and fledgling industry, but clearly, the snowball is rolling downhill and it’s getting bigger.”

 

Ted Casteel, a partner in Bethel Heights Vineyard northwest of Salem, said one of the two targeted properties, a vineyard named Zena East, is part of a “necklace” of vineyards ringing the Eola Hills.

 

Casteel added that a close friend, whom he declined to identify, has been approached by Kendall Jackson executives.

 

“Several of them came up on private jets for a day and stated their intention of investing in Oregon,” Casteel said. “It looks to me as if it’s only a matter of time.”

 

Kevin Chambers, past president of the Oregon Wine Board and chief executive of Oregon Vineyard Services, has heard the stories, too. He is convinced something official is bound to break soon.

 

“It’s really the talk of the town,” he said. “There’s too much smoke for there not to be fire pretty close by.”

 

 

——

Celebrities uncork the wine business

 

Source: USA Today

Donna Freydkin

March 10, 2013

 

Fergie, Drew Barrymore and even Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie are launching their own blends.

 

Star-powered clothing lines are so vintage.

 

There’s a new trend bubbling up: celebrity sommeliers.

 

Fergie just released her Ferguson Crest libations, from the Santa Barbara winery she founded with her father in 2006. Drew Barrymore unveiled her Barrymore Pinot Grigio, which hails from the Triveneto area of Italy. And without question, the most famous oenophiles-to-be are Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, who are launching a rosé called Miraval from their French chateau (the wine sold 6,000 bottles via online orders within six hours Thursday) with whites to follow. It’s a passion project in which Pitt and Jolie “are intimately involved,” according to a statement Pitt gave to Bloomberg.

 

So what’s behind the surge in bold-faced oenophiles?

 

“My wines are about having a dream and making it come true,” Fergie says. “It’s something for a father and daughter to share together. It’s coming from the inside out. It’s not about having a huge business.”

 

Same goes for Barrymore. “I love wine, especially Pinot Grigio. It’s what I drink with my girlfriends,” she says. “It feels so right when you’re sitting around a table having food and wine. I really wanted to start with a wine I was familiar with myself. I wanted it to be something that’s really from my family. That’s my grandfather’s crest on the label. I wanted to honor the tradition of family.”

 

Fergie, too, says her potables come straight from the heart and are a reflection of her California-based upbringing. After three decades of teaching, her father retired, left Los Angeles and decided to get into the wine business.

 

“He wanted to retire and move north and grow grapes. It was really special. And we thought, ‘Let’s not only bottle this for ourselves, let’s share it.’ I was always a big wine person. When I was little, my uncle would have these wine-tasting parties at our house. I learned that wines are about the smells and the experience as opposed to just chugging something to get drunk.

 

“It’s a social thing and a way for families to get together. It’s something I learned about and was excited about. Being a musician, wine and a good concert go hand-in-hand. Who doesn’t put on a nice record and have a nice bottle of wine?”

 

Famous names with booze brands are nothing new. Sammy Hagar has had Cabo Wabo tequila since 1996, and Willie Nelson is the proud name behind Old Whiskey River bourbon. But the latest crop of grape purveyors is decidedly A-list, with thriving careers independent of their ventures. And their offerings are equally impressive: Barrymore’s Pinot Grigio is sold at the upscale Eataly wine emporium, for example, where inventory is tightly curated.

 

She plans on launching more wines down the line, maybe one every few years, but she is in no rush.

 

“I want this to be the first in a curation of wines from around the world,” she says. “I get to go and search for them and have these great adventures. I want to pick great, great wines. This was a great way to start. It took me three years to get it off the ground.”

 

If you’re unsure about trying one of the wines, just think about the star responsible for the bottle and what he or she represents.

 

“Looking at the celebrity whose name is behind it would help,” says Gwendolyn Osborn, Wine.com‘s director of education and content. “A reality TV star may not be as focused on quality as they are on brand image, where a serious movie artist may be more likely to invest more into producing something of substance. When you taste and even read about Drew Barrymore’s entry into wine, she had a goal for taste and how it was to represent her. I liked it! I thought it was fun and fruit-forward and lively.”

None

 

Brad Pitt and Angelina are launching a rosé called Miraval from their French chateau. Already, it’s a hot seller online.

 

As for the Jolie-Pitts: “They will probably also make a quality product. They have partnered with the best in the region, they have a tie to the place where they are making the wine, and I think they have a true goal to have this wine reflect its place and its history,” Osborn says. On Thursday, the wine sold for ?105 ($139) for a six-bottle case or a little more than $23 a bottle, the Associated Press reported.

None

 

Miraval Cote de Provence is the first wine to be sold from a vineyard owned by Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie.

 

When it comes to celebrities and whatever outside brands they launch, there has to be a clear connection between the person and product for a chance at long-term survival, never mind any guarantee of success.

 

“It has to be an authentic fit,” says Jessica Stark, one of the powers behind Pauly D’s brand of REMIX cocktails. “We are not going to hook a celebrity up to a liquor brand or create a liquor brand for a celebrity just because it seems to be the hot item of the moment. There has to be a sustainability factor between the celebrity and the product. If it’s not there, you are sunk.”

 

 

——

Antinori opens to the public for first time

 

Source: the drinks business

by Lucy Shaw

11th March, 2013

 

The wine cellars of renowned Tuscan estate Marchesi Antinori have opened to the public for the first time in the company’s 628-year history.

 

After seven years of planning, the family-owned company has opened the Marchesi Antinori Chianti Classico Cellar – a state-of-the-art facility in the Tuscan village of Bargino.

 

The facility, in Chianti Classico, offers guests the chance to explore the family’s 628-year winemaking history and their centuries-old art collection.

 

In addition, visitors will be given tours around the new cellars, designed by leading Italian architect, Marco Casamonti.

 

Set among olive groves, vineyards and oak trees, Casamonti designed the cellars to blend in harmoniously with the Tuscan landscape.

 

The majority of the expansive site is underground, concealed within a hill. From the outside, only the winery’s restaurant terrace overlooking the vines is visible.

 

The project, including a restaurant, auditorium, museum, book shop and wine shop, was masterminded by the 25th and 26th Antinori generations.

 

Dotted throughout the building are sculptures by contemporary artists specifically commissioned for the space.

 

The entire Antinori portfolio will be available for sample in the tasting room.

 

The ?20 admission cost includes a three-wine tasting, with the more expensive and rare wines like Solaia and Tignanello available to taste at an additional cost.

 

The site is open daily from 10am-4pm, with the restaurant expected to open for business in the next few weeks.

 

Antinori is credited for helping to kick start the “Super Tuscan” revolution in the 1970s with Tignanello, made from Sangiovese, Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Franc.

 

 

——

‘Stupendous’ Vega Sicilia collection goes under the hammer

 

Source: Decanter

by Richard Woodard

Monday 11 March 2013

 

A ‘stupendous’ selection of Vega Sicilia wines shipped direct from the legendary producer’s cellars is to be auctioned by Sotheby’s in Hong Kong early next month.

 

Among the lots in the Sotheby’s sale at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre on 4 April is a vertical of 22 magnums of Vega Sicilia Único, including vintages from 1970 to 1999.

 

The lot, which comes from the personal collection of managing director Pablo Álvarez, is expected to fetch HK$95,000-160,000 (US$12,250-20,600).

 

There are 234 Vega Sicilia lots in total, including 42 vintages of Único from 1941 to 2002 in multiple formats – with one lot of six bottles of the 1942 estimated to sell for HK$80,000-120,000 (US$10,000-15,000).

 

The sale also features the winery’s Reserva Especial and Valbuena No. 5 bottlings, as well as group wines Alión from Ribera del Duero, Pintia from Toro and Tokaji Oremus from Hungary.

 

Describing the collection as ‘stupendous’, Serena Sutcliffe MW, international head of Sotheby’s Wine, said: ‘Vega Sicilia is \a wine that has “soul”, with its own personality, honed over the years while, at the same time, it is a true reflection of its region, climate and the area’s oenological traditions.’

 

The sale, comprising 620 lots expected to raise a total of HK$14.8-21.2m (US$1.9-2.7m), also includes fine wines from Bordeaux, Burgundy, the Rhône Valley and California.

 

It comes the day after Sotheby’s stages the Asian leg of its auction of wines and memorabilia from famed Spanish restaurant El Bulli, and the eleventh part of the sale of The Classic Cellar From A Great American Collector.

 

 

——

Pennsylvania: State Lawmakers Tackle Liquor Sales

 

Source: CBS Philly

By Tony Romeo

March 11, 2013

 

State lawmakers return to Harrisburg today after a break for budget hearings, and members of the State House will find the privatization of liquor sales sitting on the front burner.

 

The odds are shrinking that any liquor privatization plan and the complete elimination of state stores may clear the legislature.

 

Last week, the majority leader of the House signaled that he wouldn’t take a hard line on that issue and a few days later, at an event in Gettysburg promoting his liquor plan, Governor Corbett indicated the same.

 

The governor says he still prefers the entire elimination of state stores.

 

Governor Corbett says, “we can’t just do it half way.”

 

Corbett also indicated he would not rule out consideration of an alternative plan sent to him by the legislature.

 

Mr. Corbett says, “I’d be foolish to say ‘no’ at this point in time, wouldn’t I?”

 

The House majority leader, meanwhile, says a committee vote on a liquor bill is expected next week, and a floor vote could come later that week.

 

 

——

Texas: Brewers, distributors said to reach compromise on beer legislation

 

Source: Chron.com

Monday, March 11, 2013

 

A long day of negotiating has yielded a buzzer-beating compromise that could lead to passage of the most significant legislation affecting the beer industry in 20 years, report Scott Metzger and Rick Donley in Austin.

 

“I feel good,” said Metzger, the Freetail Brewing Co. founder who has been negotiating on behalf of the Texas Craft Brewers Guild.  ” . We’ve come a long, long way from the beer bills of the past.”

 

Metzger, whose San Antonio brewpub would be able to expand dramatically with passage of one of the bills, said an agreement in principle was reached after hours of talks among the Brewers Guild, the state’s major distributor groups, major beer companies and Open The Taps consumer organization.

 

Final language is being prepared and Metzger said an announcement could come within 24 to 48 hours.

 

Donley, president of the Beer Alliance of Texas, said the talks – under pressure to meet  a 5 p.m. deadline – created a “framework” for getting the bills passed.

 

“I would say the percentages went dramatically up,” he said.

 

Both men declined to provide details of the agreement, but Metzger said it scales back Senate Bill 639, a late addition to the legislative mix that was supported by the Wholesale Beer Distributors of Texas, and makes only minor tweaks to Senate Bills 515-518, the package favored by the small brewers. The latter bills would, among other things, allow small brewers to sell a limited amount of beer directly to consumers for on-premise consumption and would allow brewpubs like Freetail to package some of their beer for sale in outside retail accounts.

 

“Obviously, everybody gave something,” said Donley, who had spoken out strongly against   SB 639. He said the compromises will be good for the three-tier system in Texas and for the state’s burgeoning number of craft brewers.

 

For more specific background on the bills and the legal wrangling to date, read this, this, this and this.

 

Metzger said the legislation, if passed, would be the most significant for the industry since the bill authorizing brewpubs in 1993.

 

He expressed thanks to state Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio, who led a year-long series of pre-session talks to iron out differences between stakeholders; state Sen. Kevin Eltife, R-Tyler, who sponsored SB 515-518; and state Sen. John Carona, R-Dallas, who chairs the Business and Commerce Committee and who filed SB 639.

 

Carona last week ordered the various interest groups to come up with a compromise following a committee hearing in which his bill was lambasted by a string of pro-business groups. He gave a 5 p.m. Monday deadline and threatened to delay the legislation if it was not met.

 

 

——

Washington: Privatization of liquor industry hurting small Washington liquor stores

 

Source: statesmanjournal.com

Written by Associated Press

Mar. 10

Bonnie Roulstone’s business thrived when the state controlled the liquor business, and is fighting to survive now that it’s out.

 

She’s watched sales at her Clearview Spirits and Wine store plummet as competitors proliferate and new rules wrought by the voter-ordered privatization of the booze industry take root.

 

“It’s very questionable if I can keep going,” she said of the three-year-old store that operated under contract with the state before the change. “I would have had to (close) if I didn’t have other resources.”

 

She expected the cash register to ring less often when the state stopped selling hard liquor last June, just not this much less.

 

“There’s more competition. That’s what this was all about. I understand,” she said. “Coming out of the gate I knew I would lose 30 percent of my walk-in customers who can go get their liquor at the grocery store. I planned for that.”

 

What she, owners of other contract stores like her and buyers of state-owned stores through auction didn’t expect is a requirement that they charge a 17 percent fee on sales to bars and restaurants.

 

That rule cost her significant business as restaurateurs switched to buy from distributors who are not required by the law to impose the fee. Now she’s joined an alliance of small and large retailers, including Costco, to get lawmakers to erase the fee.

 

“I feel I can compete with anyone if I have a level playing field,” she said. “Right now the field is not level.”

 

She felt confident enough in the months after Initiative 1183 passed in November 2011 to set about opening a second store in Monroe. It is larger and she stocks a greater number and variety of craft distilled spirits, handcrafted beers and wines.

 

She knows it is a risky venture but she’s looking for privatization to pay dividends in much the way a state-run system did before.

 

“I hope that the niche we’re going after will be successful,” she said. “I think it’s going to come down to a few specialty stores and a lot of big-box retailers. I hope that we will be in the business.”

 

Voters overwhelmingly booted the state out of the liquor business when they passed Initiative 1183.

 

At that time, there were 329 stores in Washington — 167 state-owned and 162 contract — where you could buy a pint of vodka, fifth of bourbon or unique distilled spirit. And no matter which one you shopped at, the prices were the same.

 

Today, nine months after the law took effect, there are 1,428 places with licenses to sell spirits, a four-fold increase. Snohomish County had 25 stores before the initiative and, as of last week, 157 licenses to sell hard liquor had been issued, according to the state Liquor Control Board.

 

Yet while customers celebrate more places to shop, they are unhappy prices are mostly higher than when the government ran the industry.

 

“The consumer got shafted,” said state Sen. Mike Hewitt, R-Walla Walla, who is in the middle of talks about changes in the law. “It is very unlikely the prices will ever come back down to where they were.”

 

Backers of the initiative said it’s too soon to draw such conclusions because there is more that can be done to increase competition and lower prices.

 

“We have to see the market fully develop,” said Julia Clark, government affairs director for the Washington Restaurant Association. “It’s starting to work. Anecdotally I do hear prices are falling for some of our members.”

 

Opponents of Initiative 1183, however, are in a bit of an I-told-you-so mood.

 

“The promise of convenience has been borne out,” said John Guadnola, executive director of the Association of Washington Spirits and Wine Distributors. “The promise of lower prices has turned out be completely false.”

 

Not every liquor retailer is cashing in on privatization.

 

Twenty-nine stores have closed since June 1, according to the state. This includes 14 former contract stores and 15 stores auctioned off by the state. The tally includes stores in Everett, Edmonds and Mukilteo.

 

Those closures are providing fodder for a debate in Olympia on whether to do away with the 17 percent fee imposed on sales from retailer to restaurant.

 

Right now, in the battle for the business of restaurants, distributors have an advantage. Under the law, distributors pay a 10 percent fee on liquor sales to retailers, like Roulstone, as well as restaurants. Retailers must charge a 17 percent fee on top of the distributor’s fee. As a result restaurants don’t shop at the stores to avoid that added cost.

 

On one side is an alliance of contract store owners, major grocers and the Washington Restaurant Association pushing for eliminating the fee. Costco, which wrote I-1183 and spent millions of dollars getting it passed, is part of it, too.

 

They contend the state interpreted the law wrong. Eliminating the fee, they say, will help liquor stores compete with distributors and possibly offer lower prices for some types of booze.

 

“That 17 percent fee was never contemplated in the initiative,” Clark said. “We’re not able to realize that competition envisioned in Initiative 1183 because restaurants are constrained to buying from primarily two large distributors that control 95 percent of the market.”

 

On the other side are suppliers and distributors of spirits that contend the plain language of the initiative requires the fee. Young’s Market and Southern Wine and Spirits, the two large distributors referred to by Clark, are in the association led by Guadnola.

 

In the middle is the Liquor Control Board whose staff gave signals early in the rule-making process that the fee might not be required on all retail-to-retail sales. In the end they did require the fee across-the-board.

 

Owners like Roulstone said the state pulled the rug out from under them because they counted on sales to restaurants in their planning and ended up losing that business. Several, including Roulstone, sued the state on the issue.

 

“We are totally noncompetitive now for the restaurant business,” Roulstone said.

 

Agency officials responded publicly last June.

 

“The board’s rulemaking was based on its own interpretation, with advice and counsel of its assigned senior assistant attorney general. It was fully vetted as the soundest legal interpretation,” according to a statement issued in June.

 

“The truth is that the price of liquor is higher because of 10 percent fees at distribution and 17 percent at retail that the plaintiffs themselves drafted and voters approved in 2011. The taxes are the exact same spirits and liter taxes customers have paid for many years,” it read.

 

Bills introduced in the House and Senate deal with the fee in slightly different ways.

 

House Bill 1161 erases the fee immediately on sales to bars and restaurants by any retailer, regardless of size. Senate Bill 5644 would end the fee only for owners of contract stores and former state stores; major grocers and retailers would continue paying it.

 

If the fee is eliminated, the state would collect between $4 million and $5 million less in revenue for the 2013-15 budget. That’s according to fiscal analyses of the bills.

 

Costco prefers the House bill but will not oppose the Senate version, said Costco senior vice president Joel Benoliel.

 

“It is not enough. Politically it’s probably what they can get done,” Benoliel said. “They certainly ought to get that done.”

 

Guadnola said his members are “absolutely OK” with exemptions for the small stores but questioned the need for getting rid of it for every retailer.

 

“Costco really needs a level playing field,” he said sarcastically.

 

Neither bill has come up for a vote. Passage won’t be easy. Under state law, an initiative can only be changed in the first two years after its passage by a supermajority of the Legislature.

 

“I think we will end up somewhere between the House and Senate bills,” said Rep. Cary Condotta, R-East Wenatchee, whose represented his caucus in hours of meetings on the bills.

 

Rep. Cindy Ryu, D-Shoreline, who said she does not drink, sponsored the House bill to help create a “totally open market” for consumers.

 

“They should care about this (debate) because if you are an imbiber you want all the various places to get your poison of choice,” she said.

 

 

——

Maine: LePage pushes for liquor deal

 

Source: Morning Sentinel

BY JESSICA HALL

Mar 12th

 

Gov. Paul LePage delivered the opening testimony Monday during a legislative hearing on bills dealing with the future of the state liquor contract and potential ways to address $184 million in Medicaid debt to the state’s hospitals.

 

“I have a plan to pay back the hospitals and make the liquor business more competitive with New Hampshire,” LePage told the Committee on Veterans and Legal Affairs. “I am very frustrated. … We must make the right decisions and we must pay our bills.”

 

The governor spoke just moments after Democratic leaders introduced an alternative plan to repay hospitals at a State House news conference. The Democrats, who control the Legislature, suggest combining the debt settlement with an expansion of Medicaid and other health-care related measures, in what party leaders called a more comprehensive approach.

 

LePage has offered an emergency bill that would use income from future liquor sales to pay hospital debt. He plans to issue bonds that would be repaid with future liquor sales.

 

LePage has promised to veto every bill that crosses his desk until his proposal passes. Once that happens, he said, he would advance $105 million in voter-approved bonds supporting infrastructure needs such as transportation and clean water.

 

If Maine settles its $184 million debt to the hospitals, the payment would trigger another $300 million in reimbursement to the hospitals from the federal government.

 

Another bill, from Senate Majority Leader Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, sets criteria that bidders on the liquor contract must meet, such as a down payment of up to $200 million.

 

“We may disagree on our approaches, but we agree with the governor. We need to pay back the hospitals. We must get the liquor contract right,” Goodall said in testimony on Monday.

 

The Maine Hospital Association testified in support of LePage’s proposal and said it did not speak in favor of or against Goodall’s new bill.

 

“We’re very happy to see there’s no controversy over using liquor revenue to pay the debt. We shouldn’t have to beg over an overdue bill,” said Jeff Austin, spokesman for the Maine Hospital Association.

 

When asked whether the $200 million upfront payment would squeeze out smaller bidders, Goodall said every publicly known bidder has the financial wherewithal to raise those funds. If a company can’t come up with the funds, it might not have the proper financial resources, he said.

 

“Cash is king in many negotiations,” Goodall said.

 

The hearing room was packed Monday, and so many people were waiting to testify that numbers were handed out, while others waited in overflow rooms. Testimony from about 45 people lasted about seven hours.

 

In 2004, Maine awarded a 10-year contract to operate the state liquor operations in exchange for a $125 million upfront payment that helped close a budget gap. The state also got a portion of revenue sharing, which last year came to $8.5 million. Gerry Reid, the head of the state’s liquor and lottery operations, estimated the state could get as much as $500 million over 10 years if a new contract is negotiated.

 

LePage’s proposal would outsource the management, inventory, warehousing and distribution of the liquor contract. The state also wants to lower the retail price of liquor to make Maine more competitive with New Hampshire, and pay higher commissions to agency liquor stores.

 

Reid said bottles under 750 milliliters and other items wouldn’t see their prices cut, to protect against overconsumption. Reid said small bottles can be tucked into pockets, which encourages consumption.

 

From mid-2004 through 2011, liquor sales totaled $864.7 million under the contract awarded to Maine Beverage Co., according to financial documents filed with the state.

 

Maine Beverage Co. previously said it was unlikely to bid on the new contract under the scenario proposed by LePage. Two potential bidders have emerged, Dirigo Spirit and All Maine Spirits. Reid said two other bidders also might bid, but they haven’t been named publicly.

 

“Nobody at Maine Beverage Co. believes a future contract would look like it did 10 years ago,” said Jim Mitchell, speaking on behalf of Maine Beverage Co. “The business is in a very strong position today. We can’t know how the business will do going forward.”

 

John Menario, vice president of All Maine Spirits, spoke against Goodall’s bill.

 

“Anyone who proposes legislation that delivers less than $450 million to the state is sticking it to the state of Maine,” Menario said. “If it were left to me, I’d let the governor get along with the RFP process.”

 

He objected to the nonrefundable application fee of $25,000 in Goodall’s bill, as well as the requirement for an upfront payment of up to $200 million.

 

Menario said his company could come up with that financing, if needed, but there would be interest costs involved.

 

He said that 10 years ago, Maine Beverage Co. delivered to the state “a pill that was sugar-coated cyanide that bought them control of the state liquor business. More than $330 million in profits left the state of Maine.”

 

Sixty percent of Maine Beverage Co. is owned by a New York private equity company, while the remaining 40 percent is owned by Massachusetts-based Martignetti Cos. All Maine Spirits was formed last year by six Maine residents for the purpose of bidding on the liquor contract.

 

Ford Reiche, president of Dirigo Spirit, said Goodall’s requirement of an upfront payment repeats the mistakes of the past by selling off liquor revenue to a company that writes a big check upfront.

 

 

——

Minnesota: Lawmakers consider tax increase on alcohol

 

Source: Post Bulletin

March 11, 2013

 

Two Rochester Democrats are considering a proposed increase in the state’s liquor taxes as a way to fund a drug court in Olmsted County.

 

A bill sponsored by Rep. Karen Clark, DFL-Minneapolis, would raise the taxes by 3.5 cents a glass on beer, 4 cents a glass on wine and 10 cents a glass on hard liquor. Money generated by the tax would go into an “Alcohol Health and Judicial Impact Fund,” with half the money dedicated to judicial and public safety costs and the other half to chemical dependency treatment. Rep. Tina Liebling, DFL-Rochester, is a co-sponsor of the bill.

 

“Liquor taxes have not been raised in a very long time, and we know that alcohol does a lot of harm in society, and it’s pretty clear that the amount of taxes we collect on alcohol doesn’t pay for the harm,” Liebling said.

 

But the measure faces strong opposition from liquor store owners, who say it would mean much higher costs for consumers. Under the bill, taxes on a 31-gallon barrel of beer would nearly quadruple, from $4.16 to $16.17. Ari Kolas, owner of Apollo Liquor, said those added costs will end up being passed to consumers. It could also hurt sales, with customers opting for cheaper products. He is also bothered by “the unfairness of singling out one or two beverages and a certain percentage of the population that drinks it.”

 

He added that as members of the Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association liquor store owners contribute money to fund education about the dangers of drinking alcohol. If lawmakers are going to boost taxes, he said, “We should have a more broad-based tax, instead of one on a specific industry.”

 

It’s been 26 years since lawmakers raised taxes on alcohol. The Minnesota House Taxes Committee agreed last week to consider including the provision as part of a larger tax bill. While the idea has the backing of some legislative Democrats, Gov. Mark Dayton has said he does not support raising taxes on alcohol.

 

For Olmsted County, the liquor tax could offer a way to pay for creating a drug court. The county has long sought funding for an additional judge to help handle the high volume of caseloads. One way to help make that happen would be to create a drug court that would be funded by the new tax. Rep. Kim Norton, DFL-Rochester, is sponsoring a bill to set up a local drug court and said she supports the alcohol tax as long as the money is dedicated for these kinds of uses.

 

“If I am going to vote for that, I want to see this drug court put in there,” she said.

 

But getting lawmakers to agree that money should be designated for a specific use could prove challenging. Rep. Greg Davids, the ranking Republican on the House Taxes Committee, said he is strongly opposed to the liquor tax and trying to dedicate the money for specific uses.

 

“If (Rep. Clark) wants to carry an increase on the liquor tax, that’s one thing. But we are not going to allow someone to come in with a tax increase for her pet programs,” he said.

 

The proposed tax increase would raise nearly $175 million for the state for fiscal year 2014 and nearly $200 million the year after that.

 

Four Daughters Vineyard & Winery’s winemaker Justin Osborne was deeply concerned when the liquor tax proposal was first announced. But he was relieved that the author has made changes to the bill to exempt small wineries like his in Spring Valley.

 

“This would actually help give us a competitive advantage,” he said. “We would also have an advantage over liquor stores and bars.”

 

Even so, he is generally not a fan of the idea of raising the alcohol tax and said it could lead to proposals to tax other things, like French fries to address obesity.

 

Rep. Tim Kelly, R-Red Wing, shares his opposition to the proposal.

 

“I just don’t understand why we want to dictate people’s behavior legislatively,” he said. “That is a very bad policy. I believe education is a much better form.”

 

 

——

Rhode Island: Editorial: Spirits for a patriotic spirit

 

Source: Brown Daily Herald

By Editorial Page Board

Monday, March 11, 2013

 

Rhode Island House Bill 5603 proposes any person 18 years of age or older currently serving in the United States military may purchase and consume alcoholic beverages in the state.

 

State representatives Thomas Winfield, D-Glocester, Smithfield, Raymond Hull, D-Providence and Raymond Gallison, D-Portsmouth, Bristol introduced the bill in the Rhode Island General Assembly Feb. 27. The rationale behind the bill is that if a person is old enough to volunteer for the military, that person should also be allowed to choose to drink alcohol. While we agree the ages for military service eligibility and legal drinking should be one and the same, this legislation raises concerns about our society’s drinking culture by establishing alcohol consumption as a sign of maturity.

 

The United States has had a national drinking age of 21 since 1984, making it the only western nation with a drinking age above 20. One of the chief concerns that motivated lawmakers to pass the National Minimum Drinking Age Act was the troubling trend of alcohol abuse by college students, with related concerns surrounding motor vehicle accidents and emergency room visits. The law is intended to bolster public safety by relying on a three-year age gap to distinguish between those considered mature enough to be thought of as adults and those who cannot physically or mentally handle alcohol consumption.

 

The problem with the drinking age is more about drinking culture than the age itself, which is somewhat arbitrary. At Brown, it seems easy to get away with underage drinking, with law violators often being allowed to pass freely when caught. But underage binge drinking represents a very real danger across almost all college campuses. This is why more than 100 college presidents are involved in the Amethyst Initiative, a movement launched in 2008 that calls for the reconsideration of the legal drinking age. The movement asserts that the current drinking culture encourages underage individuals to abuse alcohol on campus, rather than to responsibly consume it. Yet the Rhode Island General Assembly is considering enacting legislation that distinguishes between the underage people who serve in the military and those who attend college.

 

Serving in the armed forces is a sacrifice more than 1 million Americans are currently making. Those who serve are required to put their lives at risk in the line of duty. Electing to serve in the armed forces is certainly graver than choosing to drink an alcoholic beverage – and anyone who can volunteer for such a commitment should be allowed to consume such a beverage. But lowering the drinking age solely for those who serve implies a discrepancy in maturity between them and civilians – which in turn encourages young civilians to drink in order to establish their entries into adulthood.

 

Our government has a strong history of trying to give back to service members and veterans, through measures such as subsidized housing and the GI Bill. House Bill 5603 is another gesture from our government to the military – but it is has dangerous implications for our country’s drinking culture.

 

 

——

Utah: Senate moves to beef up fines for underage drinking in Utah

 

Source: The Salt Lake Tribune

By Lee Davidson

Mar 11 2013

 

The Senate moved Monday toward beefing up fines for selling alcohol to underage drinkers, along with numerous other tweaks to liquor laws.

 

It voted 24-1 to pass SB261, and sent it to the House.

 

Its sponsor, Sen. John Valentine, R-Orem, said the state has found that undercover youth who attempt to buy alcohol in Utah bars and restaurants are successful about 30 percent of the time.

 

“This is a failure of the system,” he said. “We have to make sure our restaurants get the message. I think they will get the message very quickly” with the bill.

 

It sets the mandatory minimum fine for selling alcohol to a minor at $2,500 for a first offense; $5,000 and a five-day suspension for the second; and $15,000 and a 14-day suspension for a third offense in an 18-month period.

 

Valentine said his bill tries to seek a balance between several recent moves to improve hospitality and the need to ensure that does not increase underage or other illegal use of alcohol.

 

It would also make several other tweaks to liquor laws, including:

 

. Adds an attorney to the Attorney General’s Office to prosecute alcohol violations.

 

. Allows small cities to permit a new bar on the location of an old one without waiting three years.

 

. Permits liquor and beer “flights,” tastings of multiple drinks, often with a theme. They were already allowed for wine.

 

 

——

New York: Judge strikes down New York City beverage ban

 

Source: NRA

March 11, 2013

 

A judge on Monday ruled that a ban on sugar sweetened beverages served in containers larger than 16 ounces is invalid and cannot be enforced.

 

The ruling by State Supreme Court Justice Milton Tingling in Manhattan came down just one day before the ban was supposed to take effect. Tingling said he found the ban to be arbitrary and capricious.

 

“It is arbitrary and capricious because it applies to some, but not all food establishments in the city,” Tingling wrote in his decision. “It excludes other beverages that have significantly higher concentrations of sugar sweeteners and/or calories on suspect grounds, and the loopholes inherent in the rule including but not limited to no limitations on refills defeat and/or serve to gut the purpose of the rule.”

 

The National Restaurant Association was a lead plaintiff along with the American Beverage Association in filing the lawsuit that challenged the ban. At the time of the filing, the NRA argued that the ban was arbitrary and subjected restaurateurs to a standard many of its competitors, including groceries and c-stores, didn’t have to meet.

After the judge’s ruling, the NRA said his decision to strike down the ban was a huge win.

 

“This is a great victory, particularly for thousands of restaurant operators and industry suppliers serving New York City who would have experienced financial hardships had the ban been enacted,” said Dawn Sweeney, the NRA’s president and CEO. “We are extremely pleased that the judge recognized that the Board of Health exceeded its authority when it initially passed the ban.

 

“We look forward to working with public health officials to engage in a constructive dialogue that will have a positive and sustained impact on the people of New York City,” she added.

 

Had the ban been enacted, it would have prohibited restaurants, delis, stadiums and arenas, concession stands and food carts from selling sugar-sweetened beverages in containers above 16 ounces. Banned beverages would have included soda, sweetened iced tea, some smoothies and coffee drinks and lemonade.

 

The New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene enacted the regulation late last year, saying it would help curb the obesity crisis affecting New York City.

 

The city said it plans to appeal the judge’s decision.

 

“We plan to appeal the decision as soon as possible, and we are confident the board of health’s decision will ultimately be upheld,” said Michael A. Cardozo, corporation counsel for the NYC Law Department. “This measure is part of the City’s multipronged effort to combat the growing obesity epidemic, which takes the lives of more than 5,000 New Yorkers every year, and we believe the Board of Health has the legal authority – and responsibility – to tackle its leading causes.”